#heatshield

[itsfullofstars]

[taqato-alim]

Analysis of "Joe Rogan Experience #2281 - Elon Musk"

"The discussion between Joe Rogan and Elon Musk reflects a blend of anti-establishment skepticism, techno-optimism, and selective critique that aligns with their personal stakes and worldview. While their criticisms of government waste, media bias, and institutional corruption raise valid points, the conversation is biased by its one-sided evidence, partisan tilt, and occasional conspiratorial leanings."

Below is a breakdown of the key narratives discussed in the Joe Rogan Experience podcast episode featuring Elon Musk.

Government Waste, Fraud, and Bureaucratic Inefficiency

Overview: Musk and Rogan discuss the findings of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), highlighting systemic waste and fraud within the U.S. federal government.

Details: - Musk describes discovering untraceable payments, such as blank checks issued by the Treasury without categorization codes or explanations, estimating potential savings of $100 billion annually by enforcing basic accountability measures. - Examples include $1.9 billion sent to a newly formed NGO with no prior activity, and 20 million deceased individuals marked as alive in the Social Security database, enabling fraudulent payments elsewhere. - The government fails audits routinely, with the Pentagon losing billions annually in unaccounted funds, likened to "couch cushion" losses.

Implications: This inefficiency is framed as a poorly managed business with an unlimited credit line, leading to inflation and a ballooning national debt (over $30 trillion, with future obligations doubling that figure due to Social Security and entitlements).

Political Corruption and the NGO Grift

Overview: The conversation delves into how non-governmental organizations (NGOs) serve as a mechanism for political corruption and graft.

Details: - Musk explains how individuals can leverage small investments (e.g., $10 million) to create NGOs that secure billions in government funding, citing George Soros as a master of this "system hack." - These NGOs often have vague, altruistic names (e.g., "Institute for Peace") but function as "graft machines" with little oversight, enriching their operators. - Rogan and Musk note that cutting this funding threatens entrenched bureaucratic interests, sparking resistance from those benefiting from the status quo.

Implications: This system is portrayed as a massive scam—potentially the "biggest in human history"—undermining democracy by funneling taxpayer money into private hands under the guise of public good.

Media Propaganda and Narrative Control

Overview: Musk and Rogan critique the mainstream media's role in spreading propaganda and distorting reality to protect vested interests.

Details: - Examples include the Associated Press falsely claiming DOGE fired air traffic controllers (when they’re hiring), and coordinated phrases like "sharp as a tack" used to describe Biden before his debate performance. - Musk discusses being labeled a "Nazi" despite no evidence, mirroring Trump’s treatment (e.g., the "fine people" hoax), suggesting a deliberate campaign to demonize dissenters. - Rogan highlights the media’s reliance on pharmaceutical ad revenue, which biases reporting and suppresses criticism of vaccine manufacturers or government policies.

Implications: The media is depicted as a tool of the "uniparty," gaslighting the public and radicalizing individuals against figures like Musk and Trump, potentially inciting violence.

Immigration and Electoral Manipulation

Overview: Musk posits that Democratic policies incentivize illegal immigration to secure a permanent voting bloc, threatening democracy.

Details: - He cites examples like FEMA funding luxury hotels for illegal immigrants in New York, and California offering free healthcare, acting as "magnets" to draw migrants. - Policies in states like New York and California allow illegal immigrants to vote in local elections without ID, with an estimated 600,000 registered in New York alone. - Musk argues this is a voter importation strategy to turn swing states blue, using entitlements fraud (e.g., disability payments to illegal immigrants) as a lure.

Implications: If unchecked, this could lead to a "deep blue socialist state," ending competitive elections and cementing one-party rule, a scenario Musk says he fought against by supporting Trump.

Space Exploration and Human Survival

Overview: Musk outlines SpaceX’s mission to make humanity multiplanetary, emphasizing the urgency of colonizing Mars.

Details: - Discusses the Starship’s progress toward full and rapid reusability, reducing space travel costs by a factor of 100, with plans to send unmanned missions to Mars by late 2026. - Highlights technical challenges like reusable heat shields, requiring innovations in materials science to withstand re-entry conditions. - Frames this as a race against time, given Earth’s vulnerabilities (e.g., asteroids, nuclear war, population collapse), aiming for a self-sufficient Mars colony within 30 years.

Implications: This narrative positions Musk as a visionary combating existential risks, contrasting with earthly corruption and shortsightedness.

Artificial Intelligence: Promise and Peril

Overview: The discussion explores AI’s potential to revolutionize society and its risks if misdirected.

Details: - Musk predicts AI surpassing human intelligence by 2026 and all humans combined by 2029-2030, with an 80% chance of a positive outcome. - Grok, his AI, is designed to seek truth over political correctness, contrasting with "woke" AIs like Google Gemini or OpenAI’s offerings, which prioritize diversity over facts. - Positive applications include medical diagnostics (e.g., analyzing blood work), while dangers include oppressive enforcement of ideological mandates (e.g., executing people for misgendering).

Implications: AI could either solve complex problems (e.g., government inefficiency) or amplify human flaws if programmed with flawed priorities, necessitating careful stewardship.

Epstein Files and Government Cover-ups

Overview: Musk and Rogan express frustration over the delayed release of Jeffrey Epstein’s client list and other government secrets (e.g., JFK files).

Details: - Question why evidence from Epstein’s properties hasn’t surfaced despite promises, suspecting destruction or suppression by a hostile bureaucracy. - Rogan suggests financial or relational entanglements protect the list’s contents, while Musk speculates it’s hidden in inaccessible systems or physical archives. - Musk trusts new appointees like Kash Patel to uncover truth, but notes their challenge against an entrenched, antagonistic system.

Implications: This secrecy fuels distrust, suggesting powerful figures evade accountability, undermining public faith in justice.

Trump Assassination Attempts and Security Concerns

Overview: The conversation addresses attempted assassinations of Trump and threats against Musk, linking them to media vilification.

Details: - Rogan details the Butler, PA attempt—suspicious elements like scrubbed records, multiple phones, and CNN’s live stream—suggesting a coordinated effort. - Musk recounts two pre-Trump-support incidents of mentally ill individuals targeting him, now amplified by media portraying him as a villain. - Both see this as an "antibody response" to their disruption of corrupt systems, with Musk fearing escalation if he pushes too hard.

Implications: This narrative paints them as targets of a desperate establishment, raising questions about unchecked power and radicalization.

Cultural Shifts and Weaponized Empathy

Overview: They critique the exploitation of empathy and ideological rigidity in Western culture.

Details: - Musk calls it "civilizational suicidal empathy," where policies (e.g., open borders) prioritize compassion over sustainability, exploited by political agendas. - Rogan notes the absurdity of firing people for saying "all lives matter," reflecting a shift from colorblindness to enforced tribalism. - Examples like the pregnant man emoji and misgendering fears illustrate a "virus" of irrationality infecting institutions like the NSA and CIA.

Implications: This cultural "bug" weakens societal resilience, making it vulnerable to manipulation and collapse.

The podcast weaves these narratives into a tapestry of systemic critique, technological ambition, and personal risk. Musk and Rogan position themselves as truth-seekers battling corruption, propaganda, and existential threats, with DOGE and X as tools to reprogram a broken "Matrix." The discussion oscillates between grounded concerns (government waste, media bias) and speculative frontiers (AI, Mars), reflecting a pivotal moment of upheaval and possibility.

Logical Fallacies in the Joe Rogan Experience with Elon Musk

Hasty Generalization

Definition: Drawing a broad conclusion from insufficient or unrepresentative evidence.

Example: Musk states, "I think maybe 3/4 of The graft is democratic... maybe 20 25% that's Republicans," estimating corruption distribution without providing data or methodology. This broad claim about political parties’ involvement in graft relies on his "rough guess," lacking empirical support within the discussion.

Impact: Undermines the credibility of the claim by suggesting a precise split (75% vs. 25%) without substantiation, potentially oversimplifying a complex issue.

Straw Man

Definition: Misrepresenting an opponent’s argument to make it easier to attack.

Example: Rogan and Musk discuss media portrayals, with Rogan saying, "They’re saying it’s almost like you’re caught in an outdated version of the virus and everybody else already has the immunity to that virus," implying mainstream media blindly push outdated narratives. Musk agrees, framing legacy media as uniformly propagandistic (e.g., "Associated Propaganda").

Impact: This caricatures media as a monolith incapable of nuance, ignoring instances where outlets might report accurately or diverge from a single narrative, thus weakening their critique by attacking a distorted version of the opposition.

Ad Hominem

Definition: Attacking a person’s character rather than their argument.

Example: Musk dismisses a doctor’s advice by saying, "He’s a psychopath... a B12 addict," after being prescribed excessive B12 despite blood work showing surplus levels. The focus shifts from the medical advice’s validity to the doctor’s supposed mental state.

Impact: Diverts attention from evaluating the advice or industry practices (e.g., overprescription) to personal vilification, reducing the argument’s logical rigor.

Slippery Slope

Definition: Suggesting a relatively small action will inevitably lead to a chain of events resulting in a drastic outcome, without justification.

Example: Musk warns that if Democrats legalize illegal immigrants, "We will be a permanent one party State... a deep blue socialist State," predicting a domino effect from voter importation to court-packing and total control. Rogan echoes this, suggesting a "Central Bank digital currency and social credit score system" would follow.

Impact: Assumes an extreme outcome without demonstrating intermediate steps (e.g., how many immigrants would vote, or how policies would shift) are inevitable, exaggerating the threat to bolster their stance.

False Dichotomy

Definition: Presenting only two options when more exist, oversimplifying a complex issue.

Example: Musk says AI’s future is "either super awesome or super bad... not going to be something in the middle," framing outcomes as binary (utopia or annihilation). Rogan agrees, contrasting a woke "nanny AI" with a logical savior.

Impact: Ignores potential middle grounds—like AI improving some areas while posing manageable risks—limiting the discussion’s nuance and realism.

Appeal to Fear

Definition: Using fear to persuade rather than reason or evidence.

Example: Musk claims exposing corruption could get him "assassinated," saying, "If I fully destroy the corruption and The graft they will kill me," and cites past threats. Rogan amplifies this, noting media labeling Musk a Nazi could inspire "homicidal maniacs."

Impact: Heightens emotional stakes over logical analysis of corruption’s scope or specific threats, potentially exaggerating personal risk to garner sympathy or urgency.

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

Definition: Assuming that because one event follows another, the first caused the second.

Example: Rogan suggests Musk’s podcast appearance "the day before the election" had "a giant impact" on Trump’s victory, citing Musk’s plea to vote. Musk doesn’t dispute this.

Impact: Lacks evidence linking the podcast to voter turnout or election results, assuming correlation (timing) implies causation without data like viewership impact or polling shifts.

Anecdotal Evidence

Definition: Using personal stories as proof instead of broader, verifiable data.

Example: Musk recounts a doctor prescribing $1,000/month B12 supplements despite excess levels, using this to critique medical overprescription. Rogan generalizes this to high-rent doctors selling unnecessary treatments.

Impact: While compelling, one anecdote doesn’t prove systemic issues in medicine, risking overgeneralization without statistical backing (e.g., prevalence of such practices).

Red Herring

Definition: Introducing an irrelevant topic to distract from the main issue.

Example: When discussing the Epstein files’ delay, Musk shifts to speculating about physical vs. digital storage ("it’s either in a filing cabinet or a computer thing"), sidestepping the core issue of bureaucratic obstruction or evidence suppression.

Impact: Diverts focus from accountability or investigation progress to a tangential logistical question, diluting the argument’s thrust.

Analysis of Bias

The conversation between Joe Rogan and Elon Musk on The Joe Rogan Experience covers a wide range of topics, from government inefficiency and media propaganda to AI development and space exploration. While the discussion is framed as an open dialogue aimed at uncovering truth, several biases can be identified that shape the narrative. These biases stem from the participants' perspectives, their selection of evidence, and the rhetorical framing of their arguments. Below is an exploration of these biases, organized by key themes.

Anti-Establishment Bias

Description: Both Rogan and Musk exhibit a strong skepticism toward traditional institutions, including government bureaucracies, mainstream media, and political parties. This is evident in their portrayal of the government as a "big dumb machine" riddled with waste and corruption, and the media as a coordinated propaganda tool.

Evidence: - Musk describes the federal government as losing $2 trillion annually and failing audits, citing examples like the Navy losing $12 billion with no submarines to show for it. - Rogan and Musk repeatedly call out "Legacy Media" (e.g., CNN, MSNBC, AP) for spreading disinformation, such as the "fine people hoax" about Trump or labeling Musk a Nazi.

Bias Impact: - The discussion heavily emphasizes negative examples (e.g., NGO fraud, Social Security database errors) without equally highlighting instances where government or media might function effectively or serve a public good. This creates a one-sided narrative that assumes systemic incompetence or malice. - Alternative perspectives, such as the potential benefits of government programs or the challenges of media objectivity in a polarized era, are largely absent.

Confirmation Bias

Description: Rogan and Musk reinforce each other’s pre-existing beliefs, particularly about government overreach, media bias, and the value of their own initiatives (e.g., DOGE, X). They selectively focus on evidence that supports their worldview.

Evidence: - Musk’s assertion that cutting entitlements fraud for illegal immigrants is the "main reason" Democrats oppose him aligns with his broader narrative of a corrupt system, but no counter-data (e.g., economic contributions of immigrants) is explored. - Rogan’s enthusiasm for Musk’s DOGE findings ("one of the most important things that has ever happened in this country") amplifies Musk’s claims without questioning their scope or feasibility.

Bias Impact: - The conversation lacks critical pushback or exploration of opposing viewpoints. For instance, they dismiss Democratic policies as vote-buying schemes (e.g., free healthcare for illegals) without considering humanitarian or economic arguments. - This mutual reinforcement risks overstating the significance of their findings or the malevolence of their opponents, potentially alienating listeners who might see nuance in these issues.

Partisan Leanings

Description: While claiming to transcend traditional left-right divides, the discussion leans heavily into critiques of Democratic policies and media outlets associated with liberalism, with less scrutiny applied to Republican or conservative equivalents.

Evidence: - Musk estimates "3/4 of The graft is Democratic," suggesting Republicans are less corrupt (20-25%), but provides no detailed evidence to substantiate this ratio. - Rogan praises Fox News and conservative voices like Scott Jennings, while dismissing liberal media as "screechy woke people," implying a qualitative difference in credibility.

Bias Impact: - The focus on Democratic corruption (e.g., NGOs, voter importation) and liberal media lies (e.g., Associated Press) overshadows potential Republican graft or conservative media distortions, creating an imbalanced critique. - This could appeal to a right-leaning audience but risks alienating others by framing one side as disproportionately villainous.

Techno-Optimism Bias

Description: Musk’s vision of technology (e.g., SpaceX, AI via xAI) as a solution to societal and existential problems is presented with optimism that downplays potential downsides or uncertainties.

Evidence: - Musk predicts AI will be smarter than humans by next year and smarter than all humans combined by 2029-2030, with an 80% chance of a positive outcome, but offers little discussion of the 20% risk of "annihilation." - SpaceX’s reusable rocket technology is framed as a revolutionary breakthrough that could make humanity multiplanetary, with challenges (e.g., heat shield issues) treated as solvable without significant doubt.

Bias Impact: - The conversation minimizes risks or ethical dilemmas (e.g., AI misuse, space colonization feasibility) in favor of a narrative of inevitable progress. This could mislead listeners into underestimating the complexity or potential negative consequences. - Alternative voices—such as those skeptical of rapid AI advancement or space exploration’s prioritization over Earth-based issues—are not represented.

Personalization of Narrative

Description: Both Rogan and Musk center the discussion around their personal experiences and perceived persecution, which may exaggerate their roles as targets of a broader conspiracy.

Evidence: - Musk repeatedly mentions assassination threats and media smear campaigns (e.g., being called a Nazi), framing himself as a victim of a desperate establishment. - Rogan highlights his own demonization by CNN during past controversies, aligning his experience with Musk’s and Trump’s.

Bias Impact: - This personalization risks amplifying their sense of martyrdom, potentially overstating the coordinated nature of opposition (e.g., Musk’s claim that Democrats want to "destroy" him for exposing fraud). - It shifts focus from systemic issues to individual battles, which might resonate emotionally with listeners but obscure broader structural analysis.

Conspiracy-Tinged Framing

Description: The discussion frequently flirts with conspiratorial undertones, suggesting hidden forces (e.g., deep state, media cabals) without always providing concrete evidence.

Evidence: - Rogan and Musk speculate about the Butler assassination attempt on Trump, hinting at a "curled" path guided by unseen actors, but offer no definitive proof beyond suspicious circumstances (e.g., scrubbed house, multiple phones). - References to Epstein files, JFK files, and UAP cover-ups imply systemic suppression, yet they acknowledge a lack of direct access or clarity ("Where’s that mountain [of evidence]?").

Bias Impact: - This framing taps into distrust of authority, which may resonate with their audience, but risks undermining credibility by leaning on speculation rather than verifiable facts. - It contrasts with their calls for transparency (e.g., DOGE’s line-by-line cuts) by embracing opacity where it suits their narrative.

The discussion between Joe Rogan and Elon Musk reflects a blend of anti-establishment skepticism, techno-optimism, and selective critique that aligns with their personal stakes and worldview. While their criticisms of government waste, media bias, and institutional corruption raise valid points, the conversation is biased by its one-sided evidence, partisan tilt, and occasional conspiratorial leanings. These biases don’t invalidate their arguments but shape a narrative that prioritizes their perspective over a balanced exploration of complex issues. Listeners might benefit from supplementing this dialogue with alternative viewpoints to fully assess the topics raised.

[grillpartshub-blog]

Stainless Steel Heat Shield. Replace Heat Plate for BBQ Grillware GGPL-2100, GGPL2100, GGP-2501 Models. (Set of 4) visit https://grillpartshub.com for more info.

[outer-space-youtube]

Space Plane

How Sierra Space reinvented the Space Shuttle: they start with a brief history and answer the question, ‘Why did they stop using the Space Shuttle?’. If you have read my comments, you can skip it, then again, it’s good to hear other perspectives.   ‘I have thought about it too much and came to the realization that we were giving the Russians money, so they did not go to war to make money.??’ …

[michaelgabrill]

NESC Assists in Heatshield Investigation

NASA’s uncrewed Artemis I mission launched from KSC on November 16, 2022. After a successful mission that included orbiting the Moon, the Orion spacecraft returned to Earth splashing down in the Pacific Ocean on December 11, 2022. While the spacecraft made a safe return to Earth, postflight inspection of Orion’s thermal protection indicated that the […] from NASA https://ift.tt/L0MOfR5

[havellsindia001]

Heatshield FR Wires & Cables - Standard Electricals

Explore Heatshield FR WSFFDNEB1010, a high-quality flexible cable by Standard Electricals. Buy 100-meter Heatshield FR cable online.

[luminiera-merge]

every day i think about the opening scene in space of evangelion 3.33. all of it

[apas-95]

Did you know that NASA engineers considered the failure rate of some critical shuttle parts to be about 1 in 100 (significantly greater than what NASA upper-management considered the failure rate to be, and what was considered at all acceptable by the certification process)?

Do you know that NASA engineers currently have no idea how many rocket launches the next mission in the Artemis program (in 2 years!) is meant to involve, because the mission plan relies on SpaceX being contracted to deliver a supply of cryogenic fuel to the crewed Orion (™ Lockheed-Martin) capsule in orbit - a procedure that 1: has never been attempted before on any spacecraft, let alone the Orion™ capsule, not even in uncrewed technology demonstration flights; and 2: would require an as-of-yet unknown number of SpaceX 'Starship' launches, because said vehicle does not actually exist at time of writing?

Did you know they're planning on using this 'starship' as the crewed lander? A design for a lunar ascent vehicle, that is, that does not use hypergolic fuel, that relies on a swing-out crane as the only entry and egress point? During the original moon landings, the LEM had so many redundant methods to make sure it got astronauts off the surface of the moon, that in the most absurd, extreme case, where every single mechanism fails, there's a procedure trained into the astronauts to climb around the outside of the capsule, take a pair of bolt-cutters from the equipment box, physically cut the couplings holding the capsule to the lander stage, and take off to get home. Artemis' proposed lander, on the other hand, is planned to be a vehicle whose design didn't even include heatshields until it was realised it would obviously need heatshields, which are ceramic tiles bolted after-the-fact directly through the steel hull, because SpaceX had decided to mass-produce the original-design hull sections all at once for all the 'starships' first, before doing any integrated testing.

We're seeing the exact attitude that led to the shuttle disasters not being prevented now expressing itself in (and even through) the Artemis program, a project pushed harder and faster through the gates than it should be, by a government (and NASA administration thereby) desperate to advance the eponymous Artemis Accords (that goes unsigned by China, Russia, and much of the world) and reneg on all previous space charters that onsidered ownership, commercial exploitation, and military usage of space forbidden. Something bad is going to happen, and it's going to happen for the sake of SpaceX and the military-industrial complex at large.

[marsskaterboii]

At no point in the narrative, since Ancillary Justice, was there ever even the slightest possibility of Breq regaining herself and fully becoming Justice of Toren again. Obviously, that is not possible. There was no off-chance that Justice of Toren the ship had evaded or survived the breach of its heatshield, that perhaps what Breq witnessed wasn't a breach in the heatshield but a different sort of explosion. The story would have been vastly different, if Breq could have been reunited with the rest of herself.

And yet. And yet I can't help grieving the fact that Breq is creating a bright, independent future for all her AI cousins and herself won't be able to partake in it fully. She'll never know choosing her own captain, her own crew, her own path as a ship. Debating whether or not to clone her ancillaries. Hell, will never know singing a canon in a dozen voices herself. All her efforts in providing this for her cousins stems from her own tragedy and there's nothing, really, that could ever alleviate the pain entirely.

[trendywaifus]

Can i have Lisa,Eula and jean with an academic S/O who became smart through hard work , but still feeling like they are not smart enough?

Thanks for your writing btw they have been helping me whenever i feel down

school’s finna start soon so I’m glad I was able to get to this at a nice time. also, you’re welcome lovely! if you ever feel down just know that I’m always here for you and I’m here to stay. this blog right here proves it and this is for everyone else as well!

btw this is heavy in dialogues–ish. ( not proofread lol)

“ your cute little nose has been buried in those books for a while now, darling. i almost mistaken you for jean. “ lisa jokes sweetly, placing her hand on your back as she peeks over your shoulder to take a quick glance at your progress. you’ve tucked yourself away in the small corner of the library for the past few hours and now it’s almost closing time. for the time you been there, she doesn’t think she seen you out of that chair.

“ sorry lisa, “ you awkwardly laughed, “ i’ve been stuck on this formula for a bit. i still need to figure out the base ingredient for making the heatshield potion. “ she hums, her eyes skimming over the question and then your written out work. she rubs your back soothingly before she answers, “ you got almost everything down packed cutie but what you’re missing is butterfly wings. “

butterfly wings? was it really that simple?

you groaned, crossing your arms. “ that was such an easy and common answer, lisa. why didn’t i get that?” she chuckles airily and kissed your temple. “ don’t beat yourself over it too much. alchemy can be simple at times despite it being really complex. when i studied at the sumeru academy, even i was having trouble with some of the fundamentals and properties of alchemy. “

“ yes but lisa, compared to me, you’re, well—you! you’re a genius. you had to have gotten it right the first time every time! “

lisa frowns at your words. “ which was due to my insatiable hunger for knowledge back then. I can’t deny that i am more academically–gifted than others but you can only go so far with just pure talent. many people unfortunately doesn’t understand that. “

her words sinks in, you felt stupid for even exerting your frustrations on your lover, she was just trying to help you. “ no need to look so ashamed, darling. i understand how you feel completely, trust me. however, don’t let this discourage you from your studies. i really do admire your work ethic, you remind me of my younger self. . in a better way if i should say. “ she pats your shoulder and yawns.

“ with that being said, it’s just about time for me to close the library. since you haven’t gotten out of that chair, that rear of yours must be sore. so why don’t you be a cutie and help me put everything back up? i’ll reward you with kisses after~ “

eula steps inside of the shared home with a deep sigh. after a long day of the usual nonsense with the locals and patrolling she wants nothing more than to settle in bed with you. she takes off her heels and steps into the unusually dark living room. weird, normally you’d wait in the living room for her with open arms and a huge smile but you’re nowhere to be found. her first thought would of been you going to sleep since she did arrive late later in the night this time. that was until she notices a dim light at the end of the hallway from the shared bedroom.

she raises a brow and made her way down the hallway. “ unbelievable. “ eula mutters under her breath as she sees your hunched over figure at the desk, studying. “ you were like this when i left in the afternoon! “ you jumped at the sound of her voice and smiled apologetically at her, rubbing the back of your neck. “ my dear, you’re back! sorry, i got caught up with the material and i didn’t notice you’ve came in. “ the woman scoffed, crossing her arms with disdain. “ not greeting me at the door is something I can live with, but coming home to you cramped up in this room is ridiculous. did you even take a break, eat, or even come out of this room? “

you avert your gaze to the floor, swallowing thickly. eula impatiently taps her foot, waiting for your response. “ well? “

“. . . .uh, no? “

“ what the devil! what’s the meaning of this? you’ve been like this for the past few days! are there any exams I should know about that’s coming up? “

“ . . .no, “ eula was about to scold you but she stops herself as the sad look on your face makes itself known. her heart drops at the sight.“ i. .feel like i’m inadequate. seeing the people around me thrive while i’m stuck at a standstill. .hurts. “ you admitted, lips pursing into a tight line. eula stands there by the doorway in silence, finding the right words to say. she understands you fully, it scares her of how familiar this set up is. it was like she was hearing her inner thoughts when she was younger.

she sighs, “ don’t you dare say that, (name). you’re not inadequate at all. “ she walks over to you and rests her hand over yours. “ think of it like this, people have their own way of dancing, some may like to go slow or fast in terms of tempo to reach the end of their song. but, do you know what matters most for that to happen? “

“ practice and stamina? you’ve practiced dancing all your life, eula, wouldn’t you say those are crucial? “

“ yesn’t. i’m also trying to be more practical here, mind you. it’s about discipline and grit. you can’t have a good practice routine if you can’t separate yourself from distractions. you most certainly won’t have good stamina if you don’t have the grit to work yourself through inevitable trials and errors. i’m the way i am today not only because of the aristocratic ways but because of those two things. “

she takes it upon herself to close the book in your hands and sets it somewhere on the desk. a soft frown adorns her lips, “ but you also have to maintain your health as well, both physically and mentally. so whatever this you’ve been doing—needs to stop. now, come and get ready to go to bed with me my love, i demand for my nightly cuddles. “

“ my love, why are you up so late? “ you jumped in surprise at the familiar concerned voice and a hand touching your shoulder. you whipped your head around to see your lover, who had a worried smile on her face. if she was already home then it must of been almost midnight by now! you started studying around midday. “ oh jean, uh, i was just catching up on some notes. “ you explained, gesturing towards the set of papers in front of you. the blonde peered over your shoulder to take a look with a curious glint in her eyes. “ ah. .my apologies but, i don’t remember you mentioning anything about homework or exams coming up, no? “

you scratched the back of your neck nervously, “ no, i didn’t, i just wanted to study. “

“ and. .when did you start? “ jean asked softly.

“ erm, probably like two or three hours after you left?”

jean almost gasped before clearing her throat. “ i know that i’m not the one to talk about taking breaks but. .did you perhaps get a chance to take a walk or anything of the sorts? “ there was a short pause before you responded with a meek voice, “ . .no, no i didn’t. b-but to be fair, i lost track of. .— “

noticing your nervous demeanor, she lightly squeezes your shoulder and kisses the top of your head affectionately. “ i understand. you must be tired and hungry, do you want me to cook something while you rest in bed? “

“ no jean, i’m fine. you just got done with your official duties, it’s okay—“

“ i insist, dear. here, take my hand. “ with a warm smile dancing upon her lips, she holds out her hand for you to take. you tentatively take it and jean gently pulls you up. you stumbled a bit due to your sleeping legs but jean was quick to hold you steady. “ are you alright? do you need me to carry you to bed? “ she asks, her oceanic blue eyes filled with worry.

you chuckled softly, “ absolutely not, sweetheart. i can walk. let’s not put your back at risk here too. “ a light blush stains her cheeks; jean quietly leads you to your shared bed for you to rest. “ I-I will go prepare dinner for us, please stay in bed dear! “ she says shyly before scrambling off to the kitchen to hide the redness of her face as she hears your growing laughter.

[lonestarflight]

"Big Joe ready for launch at Cape Canaveral, FL. The objective of 'Big Joe' was to test the ablating heatshield. The flight was both a success and failure – the heatshield survived reentry and was in remarkably good condition when retrieved from the Atlantic. The Atlas-D booster, however, failed to stage and separated too late from the Mercury capsule."

Date: September 9, 1959

NASA ID: B-59-714

[spacetimewithstuartgary]

NASA installs heat shield on first private spacecraft bound for Venus

Led by Rocket Lab of Long Beach, California, and their partners at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Rocket Lab's Venus mission will be the first private mission to the planet.

NASA's role is to help the commercial space endeavor succeed by providing expertise in thermal protection of small spacecraft. Invented at Ames, NASA's Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET)—the brown, textured material covering the bottom of the capsule in this photo—is a woven heat shield designed to protect spacecraft from temperatures up to 4,500 degrees Fahrenheit. The probe will deploy from Rocket Lab's Photon spacecraft bus, taking measurements as it descends through the planet's atmosphere.

Teams at Ames work with private companies, like Rocket Lab, to turn NASA materials into solutions such as the heat shield tailor-made for this spacecraft destined for Venus, supporting the growth of the new space economy.

IMAGE: Engineers at NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley, Bohdan Wesely, right, and Eli Hiss, left, complete a fit check of the two halves of a space capsule that will study the clouds of Venus for signs of life. Credit: NASA/Brandon Torres Navarrete

[outer-space-youtube]

Heat Shield?  

The Angry Astronaut suggests that SpaceX should use Alien technology with the known heat shield technology.   ‘All I have to say is that technology needs to be known before we can use it. Maybe I should be clear that alien tech translated properly is Unknown.’   I have a good idea; we should use Moon Dust on the Starship. I don’t need to explain that regolith at high temperatures is very…

[deathscreenmessages]

JebKerman forgot his heatshield.

Godspeed Jeb o7

[tyrannosaurus-trainwreck]

Things I assumed would happen when I did coursework for web design: lol I can design websites

Things I didn't realize when I did coursework for web design: The nanometer-thin layer of tolerance I had for dogshit website design would evaporate like a heatshield on a badly-piloted shuttle going through a rocky re-entry.

[havellsindia001]

HeatShield FR Flexible Cable - Enhanced Fire Resistance for Electrical Safety

Discover the HeatShield FR Flexible Cable, designed by Standard Electricals, offering enhanced fire resistance for utmost electrical safety. This 100-meter HeatShield FR cable (WSFFDNEB1010) ensures reliable performance in demanding environments, providing peace of mind against fire hazards. Explore its durable construction and superior insulation, ideal for various industrial and commercial applications where safety is paramount.