#learn vue | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

dragoncatprism · 5 months ago

Text

Welcome to "Prism 2/3am brainrot they make instead of sleeping or actually writing cause they got too many ideas in the head"

Literally had that thought not a second ago and I missed babbling about things I like soooo much and Aventurine and Ratio are just the best to inspire

So.

Imagine.

Nous putting their gaze towards Aventurine.

I know he's not "book smart" but there are a looot of different sides of knowledge, plus the fact that he's almost completely detached from the world ??? That he doesn't care about his life and everything and everyone he loved disappeared and now he can't form meaningful relationships by fear of killing them ? His luck that is so curious but also terrible and immediately puts him apart from others ?

Also the VeriVasha angst...

Ratio, in my point of vue, did have the dream of becoming a Genius. Maybe his parents had big expectations (linking that to the name Veritas can also build looots of angst), maybe he just viewed them as perfect and like we say "Never meet your heroes", maybe he wanted to prove something... Either way, he realised that most of Genuises are truly terrible people because they are ready to make gruesome sacrifices in the name of knowledge.

And Ratio will never be gazed by Nous because he cares so much. His humanity and kindness are the things that make him so lovable but also that are hindering a "great possibility", it's Greek tragedy at this point : the hero that wants to attain their goal but the very nature of themselves is in contradiction with this goal and so they will always chase but never catch. Ratio also learned that he cared and after raging and many questions as to why, he manages to get out of this embellishment about the Genuis Society. After all, he doesn't need to be a Genius to gain knowledge, and he feels like he helps much better bringing knowledge to people instead of stealing it or weaponizing it. He considers himself a fool because for him, it's humanity at it's finest : a bit of knowledge but also silliness and care. He doesn't see himself above the others much than what is facts : he knows he's smart by many worlds standards, that he's beautiful but he doesn't think of himself as flawless or completely above others. (The people that say he does clearly haven't read the same things I read cause this man is so soft and kind and just wants to help how he can and he's also very autistic)

When Aventurine is gazed by Nous, Ratio first feels a tiny bit of jealousy -even if he isn't desperate to be recognised, he still feels envy and longing- but it's quickly, too quickly erased by a wave of worry.

He knows now some conditions to be a Genius and it terrifies him to see his partner (together or not at this point, whichever brings the most angst ooor they could have a thing on and off and Aventurine doesn't dare crossing the line by fear of losing Ratio and Ratio doesn't want to cross any boundaries) being in such a state that an Aeon that is promoting a sort of apathy and detachment of humanity

I think he would be so scared even just to lose Aventurine, he already seem so far most of tge time and this newfound recognition might be a tipping point or just the sign that he is already gone.

Nihility is scary with the nothingness but I think each Paths can be terrible and I am already trying to imagine them both following each Path and seeing what it would make them

Elation Ratio... I see you a lot, same with Destruction Aventurine cause his whole thing is protecting, but what if he decided to just destroy.

They truly have so many possibilities and I promise to myself one day I will actually write instead of babbling

It might've turned into a Ratio post pffft

I love them both so much they live in my head non stop and I love just reading sooo many theories and fic

#honkai star rail #hsr #dr ratio #veritas ratio #aventurine #kakavasha #verivasha #this is my favourite tag now #ratiorine #aventio #idh what to add it's 3 am and it might be full of spelling errors #but also it feels so good to share even to just one person

31 notes · View notes

s-lycopersicum · 3 months ago

Text

*girl with a billion other things going on voice* i should learn Vue

#my other WIPs have grown dissatisfied with my haphazardous rule and started a conspiracy to depose me

16 notes · View notes

eggdesign · 2 years ago

Note

how did you learn coding?

I am pretty much entirely self taught as far as front end goes!

I started messing around with HTML and CSS with tumblr themes back in 2016-ish.

For javascript I looked at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/ for a lot of documentation + examples. And also used codepen a lot to kinda reverse engineer existing snippets of code.

I also read a lot of https://css-tricks.com/

And for flexbox + css grid there's these:

After I got a good foundation of vanilla JS, I learned Vue for a little while and then moved on to React. The new react documentation is really good in my opinion so I definitely recommend reading that if you're interested in learning.

Most of my learning came from trial and error and working on projects that I was really excited about. I used to be so proud of findtags (the original version) which was in jquery...

The react version is miles ahead of it. And even then, the theme builder is also way ahead of findtags. I learned way more between those two projects than reading documentation alone!

#answered

191 notes · View notes

akaicodes · 11 months ago

Text

update to my roadmap of learning https://www.tumblr.com/akaicodes/744920785897111552/roadmap-of-learning-curriculum-related-so-far - 4 months later ♡

• C# - spent ~1 year so far practicing, more comfortable, can build whole sites/programs with little help

• HTML & CSS - started ~5 months ago, confident in both, can style a site without help online, still much to learn

• JavaScript + Vue - Axios - can build “full stack” applications where i do both backend & frontend and host online (love JS!!)

• REST - experienced for 5 months! can build my own REST API, use someone elses with axios & test it thoughoutly with Postman (+Javascript code)

• Unit testing & UI testing - learned so many better ways to unit test & UI test more indeph

• Started leaning Git more with commands

• SQL - can manipulate simple databases and more one from scratch

& huge thanks to my sister @niyacodes for being on this journey with me 💓

++++ I went to a 5 hour exam for all these subjects (+- more) and got the highest grade possible 🥹 (i failed my first programming exam in 1st sem!!!!) ((pic is my favorite after study-snack))

#programming #studying #studyblr #coding #cs student #exam season #100 days of productivity #codeblr #csharp #c

41 notes · View notes

actuallysaiyan · 3 months ago

Text

The Choice

warnings: mentions of suicide, angst, sadness, life experiences, death a/n: something I had to pour out into words...as I approach thirty years of life, I realize I never knew I'd get here. think of this as poetry. initially written in French

Tu sais…je n’aurais jamais cru que j’arriverai à cet âge. Je croyais que j'allais mourir à vingt-et-un ans. C’est ça que je me disais. Je me disais toujours que j'allais prendre ma vie ou j'allais juste me laisser mourir. Je ne voulais pas continuer à vivre. Mais je continuais chaque jour. Je ne savais pas si c'était juste la détermination ou c'était moi qui était lâche. Peut être que j’avais peur. Et avec chaque pas, je montais une butte. C'était une butte qui était très, très étroite. Le sommet n'était même pas en vue. Je ne voyais rien que les nuages, des nuages qui me disaient que je ne pourrais jamais atteindre mon but.

Lors de mes âges d’enfance et adolescence, je voulais être cool. Je voulais aller à la manière des rockstars qui étaient mes idoles. Les gens comme Sid Vicious de The Sex Pistols étaient les personnes que je voulais suivre. Dans ma jeunesse, il n’y avait personne comme les gens du punk rock.

Le suicide etait un autre penser. Je le voyais souvent. C'était le but de ma vie. Mais c’est quelle sorte de vie pour juste se tuer a la fin de ses vingt-et-un ans? C’est quelle vie vivre si peu?

Maintenant j’ai quasiment trente ans. Ca s'en vient très vite et je ne peux pas arrêter de penser comment je n’ai pas atteint mon but. Et c’est très, très beau.

Les gens comme Sid Vicious, ce sont des vies trop courtes. Ce sont des vies qui font pleurer. Ce sont des gens qui n’ont pas leur chance. Nos circonstances ne sont pas ce qui vont faire la diction de nos destinées. On ne connaît pas le cheminement qu’on va faire. On sait seulement qu’on peut continuer de se battre, de ce lutté pour aller un autre pas.

J’ai appris que tendre la main à ceux qui l'ont de besoin, c’est ce qui compte. Avoir de l’amour et de la compassion est très, très précieux. On ne sait jamais comment longtemps nous avons sur cette planète ou même dans la vie.

A la fin de mes jours, j'aimerais voir l’amour que j’ai choisis de donner au lieux de la haine que j’avais envers moi même. C’est un choix qu’ont fait, l’amour et la haine. Et le choix que j’ai fais…c’est de m’aimer et t’aimer.

You know… I never thought I'd make it this far. I thought I'd die at twenty-one. That's what I told myself. I always told myself I was going to take my life or I was just going to let myself die. I didn't want to go on living. But I kept going every day. I didn't know if it was just determination or if I was the coward. Maybe I was afraid. And with every step, I was climbing a hill. It was a hill that was very, very narrow. The top wasn't even in sight. I saw nothing but clouds, clouds that told me I could never reach my goal.

During my childhood and teenage years, I wanted to be cool. I wanted to follow the rock stars who were my idols. People like Sid Vicious of The Sex Pistols were the people I looked up to. In my youth, there was no one like the punk rock people.

Suicide was another thought. I saw it often. It was my life's purpose. But what kind of life is it to just kill yourself at the end of twenty-one? What kind of life is it to live so little?

Now I'm almost thirty. It's coming up very quickly, and I can't stop thinking about how I didn't achieve my goal. And it's very, very beautiful.

People like Sid Vicious have lives that are too short. They are lives that make you cry. They are people who are unlucky. Our circumstances aren't what will dictate our destinies. We don't know the path we'll take. We only know that we can keep fighting, keep struggling, to take another step.

I've learned that reaching out to those in need is what matters. Having love and compassion is very, very precious. We never know how long we have on this planet, or even in life.

At the end of my days, I would like to see the love I chose to give instead of the hatred I felt for myself. It's a choice we made, love and hate. And the choice I made… is to love myself and to love you.

#bacon.writes #poetry #love #life #angst #idk what this is

10 notes · View notes

stroyent · 2 days ago

Text

I love that I don't need help at work anymore and it's been like that for several months. Even if I encounter a task I don't know yet how to complete, I can find all the necessary info on my own and UNDERSTAND it. Oh shit now I remembered that in addition to sleeping, cleaning and maybe doing some arts this weekend, I should learn typescript real quick because I'm gonna work with vue 3 + ts very soon instead of vue 2 + js. Yes I've been doing just js all this time (with jsdocs, but that's just for the code editor)

11 notes · View notes

cheriebear · 5 days ago

Note

J’adore votre blog! Ça me rend vraiment content n’important quand je vous vois. Aussi, l’art que vous faites de reblog est magnifique. Vous avez un excellent œil pour ça.

J’ai aimé en plus vos commentaires sur les relations platonique et serais fasciné d’apprendre plus sur la distinction entre un vue romantique des liens platoniques et des liens vraiment romantiques.

(Feel free to respond in either English or French if you would like)

Ahhh merci beaucoup pour le message!! Tu as illuminé ma journée 🥰 J'adore aussi votre blog. Seriously, I enjoy seeing you both on the dashboard and in my notes. Merci pour le compliment aussi, I love to indulge in art, decorate my blog with it, and by doing so spread it to further audiences too since I know how important that is.

As for what you came here to discuss: I'm so thrilled you're fascinated to learn more about it! I'm not sure how broadly it's been talked about, but for much of my life I have been passionate about the distinctions between the platonic and romantic as concepts when applied to relationships, and also romanticism as an idea/movement. I very much think of myself as a romantic, as it sometimes took looking at things perhaps a little "delusionally" or with rose-tinted glasses to cope with living my everyday life in the past.

Cutting off the post here because it turns into a VERY long ramble. To read more about my thoughts on the distinction between a romantic lens on platonic relationships and truly romantic relationships continue reading below.

So, to establish to anyone else who didn't read my commentary, I'll go over the key parts to then expand. Platonic is often used to describe the love of a friend, as that is its meaning, and the antithesis is the romantic love of someone (whether you are with them in a relationship or not) which impliedly involves physical and sexual aspects because those are specifically excluded from platonic bonds.

Quite literally, the opposite of platonic is sexual. To be sexual is generally to be romantic, as romance as a definition involves a sort of "excitement" and "passion". I'm certain there's more detailed discussions on romance and being aromantic/asexual, but that's not exactly what I'm here today for. Approximately, it's understood that there are two common dynamics in love: platonic and romantic. One is non-sexual and the other is impliedly sexual.

If we look to the Greeks, there are several different kinds of love. That which is understood to be romantic (using other words that do not translate exactly) appears to have evolved into the English language to be combined with the Greek word for sexual love too. They go hand in hand in our Western society at the very least. And platonic is distinctly another type of love that is not romantic or sexual. The love of friends. Not romantic. Not sexual. Something else.

I must VERY MUCH STRESS that this is not supposed to be some sort of criticism of aromantic and or asexual identities in the LGBTQ+ community. That is not what I am here for. Aromanticism is not something I personally experience, so I am no authority on it, and I offer no thoughts on it in this post. I am on the asexual spectrum, so I feel that is partially where I come from when I talk about this topic. But I am also not any authority on what all ace-spec people think/feel/believe. I fully expect differing thoughts and opinions. I welcome them.

Now, to continue:

It has long been the frustration of the asexual community that platonic bonds are not taken seriously with the same gravity as romantic bonds. Your best friend, soulmate even, or platonic partner (generally, as you might have a platonic partner under the radar that is considered your "romantic" partner under law if you married or, in some jurisdictions, are considered a de facto partner - but that's another can of worms in the legal sense of these words) is not held in high regard compared to your girlfriend, boyfriend, spouse, and so on. I'll copy the post below that prompted my commentary in the reblogs and subsequently Obi's curiosity (je suis désolée, my dear mutual, I don't know your name, so I turned "occasionally bilingual" into O.B. and subsequently Obi as a placeholder).

To summarise the post: there is a common belief in our society, seen in the microcosm of fandom spaces, that "friendship is not enough to justify insane acts of love" between characters. Quite literally that is the essence of this discussion in one sentence. That platonic love--friendship--is not believed in. That friendship is not such a profound relationship of deep feelings that would motivate anyone to go to the ends of the earth over. A sentiment I highly disagree with.

As a side note: a little crudely, I think some people might be ruled more by their carnal desires than the love in their hearts, without always having the words or wisdom to internally assess the differences when acting on their feelings.

I'll be so bold as to put this to you: think of any fandom you're in. Any. Think of two characters, often of the same sex, who are friends in the canon and nothing else. Friends for the whole duration of the story. Entirely platonic with the understanding of the word as I have described it above. You got them in mind? Good. Now, I can guarantee someone, somewhere in your fandom has shipped them together romantically at some point. This is not inherently wrong. But I can tell you that someone has also argued something along the lines of "did you see [insert scene] where [character a] did this to/said this to/looked at [character b] in that way? Friends don't do that. Obviously these two characters are gay (and the author may or may not be a coward or making use of subtext)." And then that's how all the fanon ships treated as "basically canon" are born.

You could insert a heterosexual pair too; it happens all the time in our real lives. "Boy meets girl" and they fall in love because it's apparently inevitable (it's not).

It's a lot more distinct in same sex pairings though, the rhetoric around that's not what friends do for each other. Looking at them a certain way, doing something for them at their own detriment, and so on. But that's because, in an amatonormative society (one that assumes that everyone needs an exclusive romantic relationship for fulfilment in their life), many people cannot imagine prioritising friendship so highly that you might do anything within your power for someone you only have platonic regard for. That you would "waste" time and resources on someone you are not romantically attached to or pursuing (this is where my side-argument that amatonormative culture significantly is influenced by capitalism--but that may be a separate discussion for another time since I'm already yapping an essay).

There is also the fact that creatives like writers, filmmakers, and so on, are all artists. And artists have a way of romanticising some topics they portray in their art.

Romanticisation has a sort of elusive meaning in my mind. It's easier to point it out than articulate it. You could probably look up the definition yourself or the romantic movement. But it is distinctly separate in meaning/use from romantic relationships.

Let me explain.

To romanticise would be: describing the beauty of the dancing flames in the fireplace as your skin tingles with the fire's thawing heat that seeps into you like a hug from your grandmother. Or whatever. Not the best sentence in the world. Or how about this? As I lay on the glittering asphalt in the mists, I see the blue and red lights of the siren wink at me with halos like I'm looking at starry angels. Oh, or the cannibalism fans, what about this: her warm lips caress my skin as if in a kiss before her teeth sink into flesh, drawing hot blood spilling with all the darkness of wine down her chin. It hurts, but it feels good too, as if I have found my purpose in feeding her with my body.

That's romanticism. An emphasis on the unique beauty of something that can border on dangerous delusion.

By contrast, a romantic relationship is simply a bond you might have with someone where you are in love with them in such a way you experience physical desires of a more sexual nature. You can, in fact, romanticise a romantic relationship. Media does it all the time in selling amatonormativity. You could go on Pinterest right now and see boards filled with lipstick kisses on letters, suggestive silhouettes, poems between or about lovers, and so on.

Where I think people sometimes trip up, especially as seen in fandom since I haven't experience this in my real life to this degree, is when the romanticisation of platonic relationships is mistaken for an allusion to romantic feelings/a romantic relationship between characters.

Let me reiterate my earlier point about platonic bonds: by definition, they are inherently non-sexual and are not considered romances (God, the limits of the English language lead me to regular crash outs over words like this, not gonna lie).

Non-sexual. No romance. But can be viewed with a romantic lens (romanticisation) that I distinguish from a lens that views characters as being romantically involved.

This could be seen in the way your heart swells when your bestie does in fact confirm you two are best friends, or how your friend's eyes light up when they see you across the parking lot, or the easy flow of conversation between you as you sit in a cafe and bask in the buttery warmth of the morning sun and each other's smiles, or dropping everything at a single text to come help them move apartments, or fight their boyfriend, or comfort them over a death, or provide tutoring on a class they're worried about failing. There's love in all that. Not romantic love. But the way I described it all was a romanticisation of a platonic situation/bond.

There might be people who read that paragraph and thought at some point, Oh, no, "just friends" aren't like that, they must be in love or going to eventually fall in love (romantically) someday. To that, I say, please, sit down and broaden your mind a little. Treasure your friendships a bit more. Romantic love and sex aren't everything or all that matters in this world.

I just typed way too many words in an attempt to explain, basically, that there is beauty in the love shared between friends which should not be mistaken for romantic love. I know in fandoms we love shipping. It's just part of the culture. No one's gonna be able to stop anyone from it and nor should they. I can't even really ask anything of anyone.

As I said earlier, I also have no authority on this topic. These are just my thoughts and opinions. I've long been an advocate for the asexual community, and I only recently understood my own identity. Unironically, I believe in the power of friendship. I believe the love between friends is equal to the love between romantic/sexual partners and should be treated as such. "Just friends" is a term I don't like all that much. While I suppose you could argue that adding sex to the equation equals a romantic bond, changing it from platonic, I think that kind of talk downgrades the value of platonic connections and only creates pressure for people to have sex or be in romantic relationships to be considered valid, happy, and human or "normal"--the kind of view I don't think we need in our society.

Normalise going above and beyond for your friends again. Doing things because you care. Because you're a good friend. Because you're happier with the company of a community in your corner. You shouldn't derive all your needs for connection from a romantic partner. It's a lot to lay on one person. That's why you have friends and family and friends that are your family. Romantic feelings can be way fickler too. Friendships are more likely to stand the test of time.

Just some food for thought.

Friends can look at each other adoringly. Friends can sacrifice everything for each other. Friends can be your soulmate. Platonic merely means non-sexual and it is a separate kind of love from romantic. Sometimes people get confused when friendships are romanticised and celebrated, taking them to be romantic relationships. It happens. There are distinctions to be made though. Romantic in terms of beauty and romantic in terms of love/emotion are two different things that sometimes go together. Just be careful with it. English is a confusing language.

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

Hope this longass discussion post satisfied your curiosity, Obi 💝If you had any thoughts you'd like to add, feel free to do so in French or English.

#cheriebear thoughts #platonic vs romantic #romanticism #fandom culture #answered #answering asks #I didn't really proof read anything so if there's mistakes - sorry #kinda sleep-deprived too so if I sound like a rambling madman... sorry for that too #my view is not everyone's and I don't expect it to be either #my understanding of certain topics? also not necessarily correct or an accurate representation of any wider community #this is not a criticism of aromantic or asexual identities and is not intended to be #if anything I am criticising romance and romantic relationships #and probably allosexuals as a result. sorry.#I think we could stand to question the status quo and that means the people that follow/fit it sometimes

5 notes · View notes