#mod 💜 response

[prinfuranonymous]

I mean accusing people of drawing feral porn and diaper shit is, in fact, an accusation. Like that is how that works.

Here's the thing. If you don't know who 🐶🎀 is referring to - which by all accounts you can't 100% know because they are emojis as there's no longer usernames allowed in our submissions - then they could be venting about anyone on the internet that draws feral porn or diaper fur art. We all know there's plenty of artists who do so. And, technically speaking, drawing cartoon feral porn or diaper fur art is not illegal or wrong. Some might find it weird, or not be into it, but it's not illegal. You can't really accuse someone of doing something that's not technically wrong or illegal. In order for something to be an accusation or an allegation, according to the definition, the act in question has to be illegal or wrong.

The only way that you would know, with 100% certainty, who they're referring to is if you yourself sent the first ask. Which, if you did, then well…this ask seems odd.

However, if your assumption on who you think it is is the same as our assumption of who we think it is: that art is visible on their FA. It's not hidden. A quick look through their FA gallery and it's there.

-💜

[habitual-creatures]

she every on my man till i hybrid

( @rxccoonboo2 )

I don't know how to respond to this but lmao

[fictionkinfessions]

Re: https://www.tumblr.com/fictionkinfessions/782797177326092288/i-miss-the-office-its-funny-to-me-my-narrator?source=share

Stanley! It's so nice to hear from you. I'm so happy to see you're doing well outside..

I also enjoy seeing real birds here, there's so many kinds and so many sounds they make... It always makes me think of you!

I love you too, Stanley!!

-The Narrator (The Stanley Parable) #🃏💜

✉

[prinfuranonymous]

I know 🪷🐇 is close friends with 💙🦄 and 🤡🌸 which is probably where the tracer allegations come from. But as far as proof I could only really find the previously linked Twitter callout and this callout posted by ✨🐝 on toyhouse.

https://toyhou.se/~bulletins/1711318.final-update-w-credit-stolen-designs-hopefully

Tbh it mostly seems to be guilt by association. Which if you don’t like that he’s friends with certain people that’s totally your prerogative. You don’t need to make up lies about him being a tracer to justify not liking him lol. Him hanging out with groomer apologists is so much worse than petty design theft imo. So I don’t get why people are so focused on design theft and tracing allegations. Just say he hangs with weird ass people and leave it at that. No need to make shit up.

If he's still crediting ✨🐝 for the original designs and is explicitly stating that they're redesigns based off designs that ✨🐝 did that he owned, how is that theft? The issue here is improperly crediting ✨🐝 as the designer and not the creator, he is not claiming that he is the original designer of the designs. That's not the same as theft. To us it appears that most of the hate directed towards 🪷🐰 seems to stem from either personal vendetta/hatred and also who he associates with. But associating with people that are already social pariahs for their own misdeeds does tend to breed rumors and assumptions that they're all one and the same. But if that's why you dislike someone, then we agree, just be honest about it. Making up claims and giving vague reasons as proof is far more effort, time, and energy than just saying "I don't like them because they associate with x,y, and z." -💜

[prinfuranonymous]

Alright, look. The claims that we received for 🪷🐇 that we asked for proof for was design theft and tracing. We barely received proof for design theft, from a source that's been proven to be biased and unreliable. And we have yet to receive any proof for the tracing allegations. Though our DMs and our inbox is open for those who do want to send either more proof for theft, or any proof for the tracing claims. While we don't agree that the proof we've been sent is legitimate, that's our opinion. Based on the proof given to us there are more differences than similarities, and even the similarities given on the call out that was made were vague. This is in the same vein, to us, as past issues in this community of harassing and attacking someone for having a white unicorn. It's petty, and it's stems more from hate for the person than for the creation itself. To us, the designs are distinguishable enough that they would not be mistaken for one another, but we have provided the evidence given to us anyway to let the anon who asked for proof and for others in the community reading this blog to form their own opinions. And, just for your reading pleasure, here's why we disagree that the werewolf is theft. Similarities, as provided by the call out: -Red and orange dots -One red and white ear (flipped) -Bright blue eyes -Split hair, long and back length -Deep brown markings on nose and paw pads Differences, as observed by us (again, you are welcome to your own opinions regardless): -White sclera vs black sclera -Paw print shaped mark center of chest that is dark brown/red vs heart shaped mark in center of chest that is orange in color -White spots that imitate fawn spots on a deer on right thigh and shoulder vs. a single white splotch on the right thigh and what appears to be solid color on right shoulder (it's obscured by hair, it's hard to see) -No visible fangs in werewolf form vs visible fangs in werewolf form -Black claws/nails vs white claws/nails -No tail vs a tail -A large scar on the back vs. no scar on the back -A distinct bite mark on left forearm vs no bite mark on left arm -Solid dark brown right paw pad and toes vs. both right and left paw pads appear splotched/mostly pink -Braided crown hairstyle but mostly loose/half up bun hair style vs hair constrained in three different sections/loose pony tails -Pink groin vs white groin -Solid white stomach vs. pink spots? are those nipples on the stomach? -Grey/purple dress that covers the shoulders with form fitting cuffs around the wrists that cover a portion of the hand with a thigh high slit on the left side vs a green, over the shoulder dress with loose fitting sleeves and a shorter front on the skirt with a longer train in the back along with a belt and waist pouch. -Human legs and feet in humanoid form vs. digitigrade legs and paws for feet in humanoid form 5 similarities vs 14 differences. Though if we were given the full references for each character instead of this misleading collage we could probably find more. And I'm sorry, and this is from me (💜) personally, but the similarities given are incredibly vague. Red and orange spots? Really? Is no one allowed to have red and orange spots just like no one is allowed to have a white unicorn? Mismatched ears, that are already different because they're flipped, are basic traits. Same for split hair colors, blue eyes, and spotted toe beans/paw pads. These are basic traits seen in so many furry designs and if you spend any time browsing deviant art, furaffinity, toyhouse, or any other character/art hosting websites you will find these traits everywhere. Of course, if you're looking at basics, similarities will be found. But vague similarities don't prove theft. They just prove similar inspirations. Again, you're welcome to form your own opinions. But this is ours, and we're not going to pretend to be some end all be all authority passing judgement that has to be followed or agreed with. You're welcome to think whatever you want, and to send us more proof if it's found. -💜

[prinfuranonymous]

I mean yeah if it’s a small account I’m probably not going to notice them like idk how that’s a controversial take

Just because they're a smaller account that you or very few people notice doesn't negate or change the fact that it's wrong that newcomers to the space have gotten chased off, harassed, and bullied for ridiculous and petty reasons such as (but not limited to) sharing similar aesthetics in a community based on a very specific aesthetic.

And it tends to go unnoticed. That's the controversial part. Those are voices that were stomped out before they had a chance to speak.

It may be minor against the grave, far more serious issues the community has, but it's a no less valid reason for venting or being upset than the rest.

-💜

[prinfuranonymous]

hey at least mior wasn’t the first to feed her art into ai

https://x.com/eepymortician/status/1814231423878140083?s=46&t=ZRq7fYy48K8XKyNpwdw6eg

This link appears to be broken, anon. Or at the very least we can't seem to open it.

If it refers to what we think it is, you're right in stating that they were not the first. But two wrongs don't make a right.

It was wrong the first time, and it was wrong the second time.

-💜

[prinfuranonymous]

" this is a vent blog ", it feels more like a blog to just shit talk people. Maybe instead of allowing dumb, overblown, interpersonal drama to be spread around by those who clearly need therapy. Maybe only talk about those who deserve to be talked about, people who legitimately attack others and make spaces unsafe. Some of the people mentioned dont deserve unabashed hate being thrown there way. And I'm not talking about people who draw freak shit.

Well, there has certainly been a higher ratio of negative vents sent to us compared to positive vents. But we anticipated that considering the state of the community as a whole. But, as we mentioned in our pinned post, we genuinely don't care who anyone wants to vent or complain about. People are welcome to vent, complain, or even praise anyone within the community so long as no usernames are mentioned and hard accusations come with proof.

No one deserves hate, period. Unabashed, abashed, doesn't matter. And everyone deserves a place to vent and let go of their feelings. These things can exist simultaneously.

-💜

[prinfuranonymous]

you allow accusations to come through without evidence regardless of your rule requiring it. you're incapable of maintaining consistent quality sifting, with the rules becoming shockingly inconsistent depending on whether an accusation is being leveled at somebody you personally dislike or not. your blog is a mess and it's clear as day that the three of you are not on the same page. do better.

We're actually very curious who you think we like and dislike. Like actually, genuinely curious, this is not even sass. Would you tell us? We won't post the reply, because we want usernames, but we want to know.

As to the accusations, please inform us of which ones are accusations or have accusations in them. Because it seems we have very different ideas of what constitutes an accusation. We may actually be able to keep a better mind out in the future if we know.

-💜

[prinfuranonymous]

This is a genuine question for the moderators of this blog rather than just an ask. What is the actual purpose of this, other than stirring up more drama? It has been proven time and time again that Princessfur drama blogs inevitably crash and burn, all while spreading misinformation as if it were fact. In the past, these blogs have even been used to protect predators and shift blame onto their victims.

The last drama blog in this space actively avoided covering situations involving actual predators, despite receiving proof, and instead focused on petty conflicts that brought them more attention. These blogs create nothing but trouble for everyone involved, especially for those running them.

Your blog’s rules are confusing at best and misleading at worst. The rule stating, "Please use emojis or pseudonyms if possible," only encourages vague posting, gossip, and further drama. It's clear that this blog was created to fill the gap left after the "most popular" Princessfur drama blog shut down, one that spread false predator accusations and refused to take responsibility for even after "apologizing" for "letting some through that shouldn’t have gone through." And then keeping the posts up.

So, I ask again: What is the actual purpose of this blog? Is it just another space to stir up drama, or is it supposedly meant to "give people space" to air their grievances with strangers on the internet? What good does that actually do? You can't criticize the community for its toxic behavior while actively participating in, and perpetuating the same behaviors that make it so miserable in the first place. Its attention seeking behavior.

This blog's purpose is stated on the pinned post: this is a vent blog. Do you hate seeing the same tropes over and over again in the community? Complain here. Do you feel slighted because a creator was rude? Complain here. Does someone's recent post make you uncomfortable? Complain here.

You personally may not find the point or receive any sort of satisfaction from shouting your complaints into the void, but for others it's a way to let go of those feelings and move on with their life. And that's fine, everyone works through their emotions differently. If it's not for you then it's not for you.

If the rules are unclear we do apologize. We're not against clarifying questions being asked, or respectful suggestions being given to provide the clarity that is wanted.

We are not actively criticizing anyone. It's why we're not adding our own personal commentary to every ask that comes in. It's why we have stated that unless otherwise mentioned, the asks posted do not reflect the personal feelings or opinions of the mods. Sure, perhaps a snarky quip to a snarky ask, but that's not a criticism of any creator within the community.

-💜

[prinfuranonymous]

To the most recent anon that came in an hour~ ago: We would need to see some proof before we feel comfortable posting your ask. It's bordering on accusatory with how you've phrased certain parts. DMs are open to send whatever proof you may have. Or if you would like to rephrase/resubmit your ask that would also work too.

-💜

[prinfuranonymous]

so if you’re not saying it’s traced why did you allow that first ask saying it’s fishy? your blog rules state there needs to be proof with accusations.

how is it fishy?

There was not an accusation being made. The ask in question simply states that whomever sent the ask felt as though it was fishy. That is that person's opinion, and nothing more. They are allowed to vent and talk about their opinion. It is not up to the mods to justify the emotions or feelings of the anonymous users that wish to vent their emotions. We are just the place for those feelings and emotions to go.

-💜

[habitual-creatures]

Pony Steph has decided. Prebrand is now a stinky, chubby rat.

(He already looks like one, so..)

(( Somewhere in the endless Hellwalk, there is now a stinky, chubby rat Prebrand. ))

[habitual-creatures]

Good morning again lmao :)

Hiii morning!!! I'm so sorry ivwoke up then passed out again-

[habitual-creatures]

[ Xia went upstairs with the rat and Abby following. Snickering on the way. She took the case off of the flower. Which that thing was a lot larger now. The top of the flower was tilted up, a mouth appeared from the large petals. It looked more like a weed than a flower. ]

Hi little guy! Brought ya a snack. It's name is John.

Finally doing something that makes US ALL happy.

[ The thing opened it's mouth wide, revealing multiple rows of sharp teeth. Xia lifted her arms, the rat squirming. It was trying to get free, already knowing it's fate. Xia then dropped it into the flowers mouth. The thing closed its mouth, chewing and then swallowing. ]

💜 anon

Horrifying /pos

[habitual-creatures]

“HABIT, how big was that GYATT?”

I'm not even going to type out what HABIT'S response to this was.

- Vin