A little step toward a better world has just been achieved today,as the communists form a government in Nepal openly challenging Indian imperialism and the buthan puppet government
The post is machine translated
The translation is at the bottom
The collective is on telegram
⚠️ IL NEPAL AVRÀ UN GOVERNO COMUNISTA, VITTORIA GEOPOLITICA PER IL PARTITO COMUNISTA CINESE ⚠️
🇨🇳|🇳🇵 Il 12 settembre, Li Zhanshu - Presidente del Comitato Permanente dell'Assemblea Nazionale del Popolo Cinese - si è recato in Nepal, per un incontro sia con Bidhya Devi Bhandari - Presidente del Nepal - che con i vertici dei due partiti comunisti:
🔺CPN-UML - il cui Segretario è Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli 🚩
https://www.cpnuml.org/
🔺CPN-MC - il cui Segretario Generale è Dev Gurung, ma la figura più importante del partito è Pushpa Kamal Dahal, conosciuta come "Prachanda", un ex-guerrigliero maoista 🚩
https://www.cpnmc.org/
✈️ Si trattava, al tempo, della terza Visita di Alto Livello di un membro del Partito Comunista Cinese in Nepal, dopo quella di Wang Yi - Ministro degli Affari Esteri della RPC, e Liu Jinchao - Direttore del Dipartimento degli Affari Esteri del Comitato Centrale del Partito Comunista Cinese, che si occupa delle relazioni tra il CPC e partiti politici esteri, come il Partito Comunista del Vietnam o il Partito Rivoluzionario del Popolo Lao ⭐️
🧾 Il 20 novembre, in un clima "bollente", si sono svolte le elezioni in Nepal, e le formazioni si sono presentate in questo modo:
📄 La "Coalizione dei 5 Partiti", una sorta di miscuglio - essenzialmente guidato dall'opportunismo - che aveva iniziato a guidare il paese dopo il litigio tra Oli e Prachanda nel 2020. In tale coalizione, che presentava i medesimi partiti della coalizione di governo, vi era il Partito del Congresso, un partito politico pro-India e pro-USA, così come l'MC di Prachanda (❗️), che si trovava lì per motivi opportunistici più che ideologici.
📄 L'UML - guidato da Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli - come unico partito d'opposizione.
📊 Le elezioni in Nepal si dividono in "Party List" e "Constituency" - l'UML aveva preso 26,95% nel PL e 30,83% nel Constituency, mentre il Congresso 25,71% e 23,19%, e l'MC 11,13% e 9,37%.
🏵 Alle elezioni, l'UML ha trionfato in quasi tutte le regioni, ma la C5P - se unita - superava di gran lunga l'UML, anche se mancavano due seggi per l'ottenimento della maggioranza.
🇮🇳|🇺🇸 In ogni caso, sembrava fatta per una vittoria di una coalizione pro-India e pro-USA guidata dal Partito del Congresso, che aveva in mente di accettare un pacchetto da 500 milioni di dollari dagli USA, un vero e proprio "acquisto di sovranità" da parte degli imperialisti statunitensi, che avevano intenzione di trasformare il Nepal nell'ennesimo fantoccio anti-Cinese e anti-comunista.
↩️ Invece, nei giorni precedenti, Prachanda - leader dell'MC - ha iniziato a mostrare un dissapore nei confronti della C5P, rea - secondo lui - di aver tradito le promesse pre-elezioni.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/12/26/maoist-leader-prachanda-emerges-nepals-next-prime-minister/
⭐️ Inoltre, Dev Gurung - SG del Centro Maoista - ha iniziato a proporre l'idea di una coalizione comunista, e così, sia lui che Prachanda, hanno iniziato a dialogare con Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli 🚩
🇨🇳 Wang Xin - Ambasciatore Cinese in Nepal - ha intensificato gli incontri politici con i partiti comunisti del Nepal, con l'obiettivo di costruire l'unità per poter governare.
🇳🇵Inoltre, Barsaman Pun - membro del Centro Maoista, ed ex guerrigliero - è tornato velocemente in Nepal dalla Cina, per contribuire - come affermato da Khabarhub, media nepalese - alla costruzione dell'unità tra i comunisti.
🇳🇵E così, nonostante le alte probabilità di un nuovo governo pro-India e pro-USA, ieri - 25 dicembre - è stata annunciata l'alleanza tra i comunisti, tra l'UML e il MC, con Pushpa Kamal Dahal - Prachanda - come nuovo Primo Ministro.
🇳🇵|🇮🇳|🇨🇳 Il Nepal è da sempre in orbita pro-India, pertanto un tale capovolgimento - il secondo, per giunta, ma questa volta dovrebbe essere più stabile - rappresenta un'enorme vittoria geopolitica, nonché ideologica, del Partito Comunista Cinese.
🌸 Iscriviti 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
⚠️ NEPAL WILL HAVE A COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT, GEOPOLITIC VICTORY FOR THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA ⚠️
🇨🇳|🇳🇵 On September 12, Li Zhanshu - Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of China - went to Nepal, for a meeting with both Bidhya Devi Bhandari - President of Nepal - and with the leaders of the two parties communists:
🔺CPN-UML - whose Secretary is Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli 🚩
https://www.cpnuml.org/
🔺CPN-MC - whose General Secretary is Dev Gurung, but the most important figure of the party is Pushpa Kamal Dahal, known as "Prachanda", an ex-Maoist guerrilla 🚩
https://www.cpnmc.org/
✈️ It was, at the time, the third High-Level Visit of a member of the Communist Party of China to Nepal, after that of Wang Yi - Minister of Foreign Affairs of the PRC, and Liu Jinchao - Director of the Foreign Affairs Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, which deals with the relationship between the CPC and foreign political parties, such as the Communist Party of Vietnam or the Lao People's Revolutionary Party ⭐️
🧾 On November 20, in a "hot" climate, elections were held in Nepal, and the formations presented themselves as follows:
📄 The "Coalition of 5 Parties", a sort of hodgepodge - essentially driven by opportunism - which had started to lead the country after the quarrel between Oli and Prachanda in 2020. In this coalition, which featured the same parties as the government coalition , there was the Congress Party, a pro-India and pro-US political party, as well as Prachanda's MC (❗️), who were there for opportunistic rather than ideological reasons.
📄 The UML - led by Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli - as the only opposition party.
📊 Elections in Nepal are divided into "Party List" and "Constituency" - the UML had taken 26.95% in the PL and 30.83% in the Constituency, while the Congress 25.71% and 23.19%, and the MC 11.13% and 9.37%.
🏵 In the elections, the UML triumphed in almost all regions, but the C5P - if united - far exceeded the UML, even if there were two seats left to obtain a majority.
🇮🇳|🇺🇸 In any case, it seemed made for a victory of a pro-India and pro-US coalition led by the Congress Party, which was planning to accept a 500 million dollar package from the US, a real "buying of sovereignty" by the US imperialists, who intended to turn Nepal into yet another anti-Chinese and anti-communist puppet.
↩️ Instead, in the previous days, Prachanda - leader of the MC - began to show a disagreement with the C5P, guilty - according to him - of having betrayed the pre-election promises.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/12/26/maoist-leader-prachanda-emerges-nepals-next-prime-minister/
⭐️ Also, Dev Gurung - SG of Maoist Center - started proposing the idea of communist coalition, and so both he and Prachanda started dialogue with Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli 🚩
🇨🇳 Wang Xin - Chinese Ambassador in Nepal - has intensified political meetings with the communist parties of Nepal, with the aim of building unity in order to govern.
🇳🇵 Furthermore, Barsaman Pun - a member of the Maoist Center, and a former guerrilla - quickly returned to Nepal from China, to contribute - as stated by Khabarhub, Nepalese media - to the construction of unity among the communists.
🇳🇵And so, despite the high probability of a new pro-India and pro-USA government, yesterday - December 25th - the alliance between the communists, between the UML and the MC, with Pushpa Kamal Dahal - Prachanda was announced - as the new Prime Minister.
🇳🇵|🇮🇳|🇨🇳 Nepal has always been in a pro-India orbit, therefore such a reversal - the second, moreover, but this time should be more stable - represents a huge geopolitical, as well as ideological, victory for the Party Chinese Communist.
🌸 Subscribe 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
19 notes
·
View notes
Monarchy vs Democracy: Nepal’s Situation to Adopt Monarchy and Debates
Introduction
Nepal is a landlocked country situated in South Asia, with a rich cultural and political history. Nepal abolished its monarchy in 2008 and became a federal democratic republic. However, in recent years, there have been debates and discussions regarding the reintroduction of the monarchy in Nepal. This blog post will explore the arguments for and against the adoption of monarchy in Nepal.
Section 1: The Case for Monarchy in Nepal /Merits of Monarchy
Subsection 1.1: Stability and Continuity One of the main arguments in favor of reintroducing the monarchy in Nepal is stability and continuity. Supporters of the monarchy argue that a constitutional monarchy can provide a sense of continuity and stability in times of political turmoil. The monarch can act as a symbol of national unity and provide a sense of stability that elected officials may not be able to provide.
Subsection 1.2: Tradition and Culture Another argument in favor of the monarchy is that it represents tradition and culture. The monarchy has been an integral part of Nepal’s history and culture, and many Nepalese citizens feel a strong attachment to it. Supporters of the monarchy argue that reintroducing the institution can help preserve Nepal’s cultural heritage and traditions.
Section 2: The Demerits of Monarchy
Subsection 2.1: Democratic Values One of the main disadvantages of the monarchy is that it goes against democratic values. In a democracy, power is vested in the people, not in a single individual or family. Supporters of democracy argue that Nepal’s transition to a republic was an important step towards establishing a democratic society.
Subsection 2.2: Accountability and Transparency Another disadvantage of the monarchy is that it lacks accountability and transparency. In a democracy, elected officials are accountable to the people and can be held responsible for their actions. In a monarchy, the monarch may not be accountable to anyone, and their decisions may be made without transparency or public scrutiny.
Section 3: The Merits of Democracy
Subsection 3.1: Democratic Values One of the main advantages of democracy is that it upholds democratic values. In a democracy, power is vested in the people, and elected officials are accountable to them. This ensures that the government represents the will of the people.
Subsection 3.2: Accountability and Transparency Another advantage of democracy is that it promotes accountability and transparency. In a democracy, elected officials are accountable to the people and can be held responsible for their actions. This ensures that the government operates in a transparent and accountable manner.
Section 4: The Demerits of Democracy
Subsection 4.1: Instability and Inefficiency One of the main disadvantages of democracy is that it can lead to instability and inefficiency. In a democracy, there are frequent elections and changes in government, which can lead to instability and inefficiency in decision-making. This can be particularly problematic in countries with a history of political turmoil, like Nepal.
Subsection 4.2: Lack of Expertise Another disadvantage of democracy is that it may lead to a lack of expertise in decision-making. Elected officials may not have the necessary expertise to make complex decisions, and may be more concerned with winning elections than with making sound policy decisions.
Conclusion
I understand that some people in Nepal may be calling for the reintroduction of the monarchy due to issues such as political instability and corruption in the current democratic system. However, it’s important to note that reintroducing monarchy is not necessarily the solution to these challenges.
Instead, efforts should be made to address the root causes of these issues and improve the functioning of democratic institutions. This could include strengthening democratic accountability and transparency, reducing corruption, and improving the rule of law. In some cases, reforming the democratic system itself may be necessary to address these challenges.
It’s important to remember that both monarchy and democracy have their own strengths and weaknesses, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution to governance. Ultimately, it is up to the people of Nepal to determine what form of government they want based on their own priorities and values.
There are arguments on both sides of the debate, it is ultimately up to the people of Nepal to decide whether to reintroduce the monarchy or not. It is important to consider the implications of such a decision, including the impact on democratic values, stability, and continuity. Whatever the decision, it is crucial that the process is transparent and inclusive, and that the voices of all Nepalese citizens are heard and respected.
0 notes