#objectphile

[189bcc00b6d5]

cw: electric dreams spoilers

IM FUCKING SOBBING WHY DID THEY MAKE EDGAR EXPLODE WHAT THE FUCK RJNIRGRIUHEGUIEHGRUISHUIGGHRUIGHSI

[ahllohehn]

your art style is so amazing can I please marry it and join the list of objectphiles /silly

you first have to defeat their Seven Evil Exes

[regretevator-confessions]

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Unpleasant Gradient is objectphilic in a way, since hes literally a Gradient.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real graident but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a gradient Its weird to sexualize that. :p

.

[regretevatortakes]

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing pest is zoophilic in a way, since hes literally a bug.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct stag beetle but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a bug. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing split is fruitphilic in a way, since shes literally a banana.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus she's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse??

Like yeah she's not a real anatomically correct banana but she still sounds, acts, and looks like a banana. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing bive is hairphilic in a way, since shes literally made of hair. ik people r gonna say "well no cus she's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah she's not a real anatomically correct hair person but she still sounds, acts, and looks like hair. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Mannequin Mark is agalmatophilic in a way, since hes literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Wallter is agalmatophilic in a way, since hes literally a statue.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct statue but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a statue. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing DRETRO is emojiphilic in a way, since shes literally an emoji.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus she's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah she's not a real anatomically correct emoji but she still sounds, acts, and looks like an emoji. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

"probably a hot take etc etc" anon I hate you. I know that its a copy pasta but I'm your biggest hater. just stop I beg

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Lampert is lampphilic in a way, since hes literally a lamp.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct lamp but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a lamp. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

had to do it gang -💤

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Infected is robloxophilic in a way, since hes literally a robloxian.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct robloxian but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a robloxian. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

"ur not even going for the fact Split's a dog???" anon here

that first time when I was like "ur not even going for the fact she's a [insert thing here]", I meant SLUG and not banana. fml.

ok enough with the "probably a hot take but i feel like sexualizing x is y" copypasta this is getting extremely stupid and i don't know how much more of this proshipping nonsense i can take

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Unpleasant Gradient is objectphilic in a way, since hes literally a Gradient.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real graident but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a gradient Its weird to sexualize that. :p

I genuinely cant tell when something said here is a copypasta or not most of the time

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Glevil is agalmatophilic in a way, since they're literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but they still sound, act, and look like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Boots is agalmatophilic in a way, since they're literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah she's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Jimmy is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Kai is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Manequinn is agalmatophilic in a way, since they're literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah they're not a real anatomically correct mannequin but they still sound, act, and look like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Timmy is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Mannequinn is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Mannequin SAM is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Mannequin GAM is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Mannequin RAM is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing that one armless mannequin is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing buffman is agalmatophilic in a way, since he's literally a mannequin.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct mannequin but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a mannequin. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing mannequins is agalmatophilic in a way, since they're literally mannequins.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah they're not real anatomically correct mannequins but they still sound, act, and looks like mannequins. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

I’m going to send the sexualizing blank is blank copypasta to the pressure confessions blog but with sebastian I’ll let you know how they react

Ok

pressure confessions troller here they didn’t accept the ask😢

Ok

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing reddy is robophilic in a way, since hes literally a robot.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse??

Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct chuck e cheese robot but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a robot. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Folly is Yumophilic in a way, since shes literally a dream.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus she's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah she's not a real anatomically correct statue but she still sounds, acts, and looks like a dream. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

no hate to the mods but can you stop replying to the copypasta? :’)

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Stat is haterphilic in a way, since shes literally a hater.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus she's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah she's not a real anatomically correct hater but she still sounds, acts, and looks like a robloxian. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Emerson is Redballworkerphilic in a way, since hes literally a red ball diner worker.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct Red ball diner worker but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a Red ball diner worker. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

seeing ppl take the hot take copypasta seriously is the funniest shit ever to me

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing ≤梴 ›æıµ˘´ is æ┍┍philic in a way, since its literally a ≥¢ˆ«≤.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah it's not a real anatomically correct ›æɲæ¿°ıµ but it still sounds, acts, and looks like a ✁æ≤æıӘ ∏æ´æ¿¿Ә . Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Sarah is twostudcampphilic in a way, since shes literally a camp counselor.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus she's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah she's not a real camp counselor but she still sounds, acts, and looks like a camp counselor Its weird to sexualize that. :p

I'm so sick of the copypasta (you guys know which one)

Its not even that funny

hi im the "sexualizing umpleasant gradient is objectphillic" anon and i would like 2 say thats a copypasta that i decided to join in on and that im not objectumphobic

I am objectum myself.

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Gnarpy is alienphilic in a way, since xe’s literally a alien.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus xe’s fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah xe’s not a real anatomically correct alien but xe still sounds, acts, and looks like a alien. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

NOT ME GETTING TURNED INTO A COPYPASTA?? /that one pest anon

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Medkit is robloxianphillic in a way, since hes literally a robloxian.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real robloxian but he still sounds, acts, and looks like a robloxian Its weird to sexualize that. :p

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizinSHUT THE FUCK UP I'M KILLING YOU WITH HAMMERS GRAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀

https://www.tumblr.com/regretevator-confessions/759630378735681536/probably-a-hot-take-but-i-feel-like-sexualizing?source=share

Okay, First of all. Fuck you for being anti-objectum. Second of all, Timmy looks like a child why would anyone sexualize him. Third, Where the fuck is Mark anon?? What? Is he not a mannequin?? And why the fuck are you just saying different variations of "oh!! Sexualizing this one mannequin is agalmatophilic!!!" couldn't you just stick with "i think sexualizing every mannequin is agalmatophilic" since that's easier to read??? I'm not scrolling through your longass shitpost i have to read people's opinions and confessions! "Oh its a copypasta!!" SHUT UP THIS IS STUPID AS FUCK. Why are you all like this... You didn't even mention that its wrong because the devs are UNCOMFORTABLE with it! Gosh..

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing

Is conceptum in a way, since its literally a screenshot... ik people r gonna say "well no cus it's a screenshot" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use as an excuse?? Like yeah it's not a real anatomically correct screenshot but it still sounds, acts, and looks like a screenshot. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

(I’m so sorry)

I don’t get why some people r so pressed about the “sexualizing ____ is weird because” copypasta. I mean, I totally see why someone may find it annoying, but the copypasta is just for shits & giggles brah 😭 just like all copypastas are. & I scroll through this blog every now & then, it’s not like the copypasta is being spammed 24/7, I’m assuming that’s why the mods still post them lmfao. But yeah if you don’t like it you can just scroll, no need to stress over something so minuscule

The confession that comes after this one is real funny.

"stop the "i think sexualizing x is..." copypastas! theyre annoying!" NO!!! SHUT THE FUCK UP!!! THEY ARE FUNNY AS HELL YOU FUCKING HRRRRGH!!!

There we go.

Probably a hot take, but I feel like sexualizing Gregoriah is lesboyphilic in a way, since hes literally a lesboy.. ik people r gonna say "well no cus he's fictional" but isn't that what lolicons n shit use an an excuse?? Like yeah he's not a real anatomically correct lesboy but she still sounds, acts, and looks like a lesboy. Its weird to sexualize that. :p

sorry for probably driving you guys mad I was getting a little too bored waiting for the new genshin impact update to finish downloading

-robloxconfessions2

STP I JUST REALIZED THIS IS A COPYPASTA

[randomblognumberfuck]

Hey Robophilies and Objectphiles...

What's your opinion on mecha armors?

[miradawhissu]

So I saw one of my people that actually reblogged one of my other blog's post turns out, they supported a paraphilia

If you guys support paraphilias, please get out of my blog or any of my other blogs. It makes me very uncomfortable. Since I was almost groomed by a objectphile

Even if your paraphilia seems to be harmless, please don't ever interact with me, you're gonna make me more uncomfortable, since I'd like to have my content more of a safer place for people who don't have paraphilias like LGBTQ+communities, not paraphilias,

and even if it seems harmless would get worse, so please do your research on It's why it's harmful and please, if you disagree, block me or just ignore me because you don't have any time to waste on me talking about why it's bad and you can not change my opinion why it's harmful.

Sorry if I sounded mean but it's has to be said.

!! BTW THAT DOESN'T MEAN I'M AGAINST RECOVERY, GUYS I'M PRO RECOVERY I JUST TALKING ABOUT PPL WHO THINK RECOVERY IS HARMFUL!!

[shoppingkartxd]

hello !

im new to tumblr :^3

my name is lincoln ! i go by he/him and i might be a objectphile or watver its called .. i am 13 >_<

[serfuzzypushover]

my main issue with rads is, personally, the fact they take advantage of people (ie; those pushed out of the queer communities by exclus & recovering paras) who are just seeking a place where they aren’t constantly treat as evil or being treat like criminals

the fucked up shit rads defend is really easy to see as being bad, but the manipulation tactics they clearly use is the part that makes me feel physically unwell

ugh yea i forgot about paras too... listen as someone wwhos an objectphile and has pocd these ppl are not your friends. paraphilias are inherently harmful, if not to others, to yourself. they shouldnt b encouraged.

this is the exact same tactic proshippers and terfs use. they see vulnerable ppl getting excluded and they recruit them.

[189bcc00b6d5]

can someone explain plushum for DUMMIES who think its zoophillia my friend thinks that n idk how 2 explain it

[regretevator-confessions]

hi im the "sexualizing umpleasant gradient is objectphillic" anon and i would like 2 say thats a copypasta that i decided to join in on and that im not objectumphobic

I am objectum myself.

(referring to this)

[systemfailuretpd]

I guess the little gremlin is just named Failure now- he was *originally* a character from a project I was using as a persona for content.

He’s become a self insert into an au.

Forcibly.

The people made the sona cannon to the au.

Does this make Dsaf a cannon world in the wtts multiverse?

Does that mean some of these characters can just… meet up as a cross over when Vee gets his ability to rip holes into the fabrics of reality?

Does that make it so… oh god no…

The shit head gang being a thing in a Dsaf au is the worst possible outcome I can imagine.

What happens when a;

pyromaniac,

way to obsessive researcher,

a doctor from the equivalent of the 1700’s,

an objectphile,

a control freak,

an ex-hitman,

4 long dogs,

a self mutilating masochist

and a demon who thinks she can redeem them all

end up working together?

You get the underground somehow ethical organ harvesting facility.

That, and hundreds of casualties, along side pure chaos as everyone waits each month for the harvest.

Now imagine this group of people, in the same room as Dave and or Jack…

Needless to say, this is the first time that I don’t want to think about that possibility.

You think failure is bad? He’s fairly tame in morality and behaviour compared anyone in list above.

[189bcc00b6d5]

we need more pin maker love cuz.. oh my god.

[189bcc00b6d5]

YALL MY FRIEND MIGHT BE OBJECTUM??????