#quad turbo

[en-wheelz-me]

[carsthatnevermadeitetc]

Bugatti W16 Mistral Roadster, 2022. The final iteration of Bugatti’s quad turbo W16 Chiron-based hypercars borrows the name of a Mediterranean wind and packs a 1,600PS punch. Production will be limited to 99 cars priced at $5 million each. The 8.0 litre V16 engine will end its 20 year reign as one of the world’s most OTT motors and the only ever series production W16. Bugatti would like the Mistral to be the world’s fastest convertible though Hennessey’s new Venom F5 Spyder might have it beaten 

[tvrcerberaspeed12]

i haven't heard enough about BMW's quad turbo, double compound system diesel I6 a.k.a. B57D30S0 a.k.a. the M50d engine

[world-city]

Quad-Turbo Alpina XD3 #Acceleration Test

[vqlisms]

ok but why do all the beyblade openings go hard

[wheelsgoroundincircles]

This 1970 Pontiac GTO convertible was first delivered to the A.C. Morris Garage of Summersville, West Virginia, and during prior ownership it underwent a body-off rotisserie refurbishment that was completed in 2006. The car is claimed to be one of just 241 examples that were ordered with 455ci V8 and an optional automatic transmission for the model year, and it is finished in Burgundy over red vinyl upholstery. Other equipment includes a four-barrel carburetor, a Ram Air hood, a power-operated convertible top, power steering, front disc brakes, and a 12-bolt rear end housing a Safe-T-Track limited-slip differential. Acquired by the selling dealer in 2013 out of Arizona, this GTO convertible is offered in Missouri with refurbishment photos, manufacturer’s literature, build sheets, a reproduction window sticker, documentation from Pontiac Historical Services, correspondence with the GM Heritage center, and a clean Missouri title.

The car was finished from the factory in Burgundy, and the body was stripped, mounted to a rotisserie jig, and repainted during the refurbishment, at which time a replacement convertible top was installed. Features include a color-matched Endura front bumper, a chrome rear bumper, a Ram Air hood, and quad exhaust outlets with polished finishers.

Rally II 14″ wheels are mounted with 215/70 Firestone Wide-Oval tires. Braking is provided by power-assisted front discs and rear drums, and the car was optioned with power steering when new.

The cabin has been retrimmed with red vinyl upholstery (2254) as well as color-coordinated carpets and interior trim. Equipment includes front bucket seats and a rear bench, a woodgrain steering wheel, an AM/FM radio, and an 8-track player. A pre-delivery-style instruction tag is attached to the steering column, and Pontiac-branded rubber floor mats line the front and rear footwells.

The turned metal and woodtone trim-accented cluster houses Rally instrumentation consisting of a 140-mph speedometer, a tachometer, and a combination gauge. The five-digit odometer shows under 96k miles, approximately 50 of which have been driven by the seller. True mileage is unknown.

The optional 455ci V8 features a four-barrel carburetor and a Ram Air hood, and it produced a factory-rated 360 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque when new. The engine stamping shown within the gallery ends in 0P121234, which matches the final eight digits of the car’s serial number. Additional identification numbers are presented in the gallery.

Power is sent to the rear wheels through an optional Turbo Hydramatic 400 three-speed automatic transmission and a 12-bolt rear end housing a Safe-T-Track limited-slip differential. Additional photos are provided in the gallery to illustrate the underside, drivetrain, and suspension components.

Photos showing various stages of the refurbishment are depicted above.

Additional items accompanying the car include manufacturer’s literature, build sheets, a reproduction window sticker, documentation from Pontiac Historical Services, and 2012 correspondence with the GM Heritage center confirming the car’s specifications and equipment, photos of which are provided in the gallery.

[itcars]

Reveal: The Aston Martin DBS 770 Ultimate

Long associated with cars of exquisite style and intoxicating performance, the DBS nameplate has been attached to some of Aston Martin’s finest flagships. Since 2018 the DBS has stood at the pinnacle of Aston Martin’s series production range; a Twin-Turbo V12 powerhouse blessed with ferocious performance and unmatched style. With production of this current generation DBS nearing its end, Aston Martin is proud to introduce a DBS to surpass all others; the DBS 770 Ultimate.

As its name suggests, the DBS 770 Ultimate is an emphatic last word. The most powerful production Aston Martin ever, and the fastest and most powerful DBS to date, extensive design and engineering enhancements ensure the DBS 770 Ultimate is an unforgettable and highly-collectible celebration of Aston Martin’s flagship Super GT. Available in both Coupe and Volante form, DBS770 Ultimate will be built in strictly limited numbers – 300 Coupes and 199 Volantes – with all examples sold ahead of release.

DBS 770 Ultimate features a ferocious iteration of Aston Martin’s quad-cam 60-deg 5.2-litre V12 engine. Now developing 770PS at 6500rpm and a colossal 900Nm of torque from just 1800rpm to 5000rpm, propelling DBS 770 Ultimate to a top speed of 211mph, this magnificent engine benefits from modified air and ignition pathways together with a 7% increase in maximum turbo boost pressure. Precise tuning of power and torque curves gives the driver a sense of boundless performance, with an intoxicating blend of exceptional response, outstanding in-gear acceleration and the authentic V12 soundtrack.

Production of the DBS 770 Ultimate is due to commence in Q1 of 2023, with first deliveries scheduled to begin during Q3 2023.

[awetistic-things]

i would like to introduce 2022’s tweet of the year:

[ ID — Andrew Tate tweeting, “Hello Greta Thunberg. I have 33 cars. My Bugatti has a w12 8.0L quad turbo. My TWO Ferrari 812 competizione have 6.5L v12s. This is just the start. Please provide your email address so i can send you complete list of my car collection and their respective enormous emissions.

Greta Thunberg quote tweets Tate’s original post with the message, “yes, please do enlighten me. email me at smalldickenergy@getalife.com” — END ID ]

[gretatheblog]

Greta Thunberg le dio una original respuesta al excampeón de kickboxing luego de que este se burlara de ella alardeando de las altas emisiones de su colección de autos.

El polémico influencer británico-estadounidense, que este jueves fue detenido en Rumania en el marco de una investigación sobre tráfico de personas horas después de su enfrentamiento con Thumberg, escribió el martes en Twitter:

"Hola, @GretaThunberg, tengo 33 autos. Mi Bugatti tiene w16 8.0L quad turbo. Mis DOS Ferrari 812 de la competencia tienen 6.5L v12. Esto es solo el comienzo. Proporciona tu dirección de correo electrónico para que pueda enviarte una lista completa de mi colección de autos y sus respectivas enormes emisiones ".

El tuit de Tate estuvo acompañado de una foto que lo muestra llenando el tanque de combustible de su Bugatti.

a joven activista de 19 años esperó unas horas y respondió al exdeportista con un tuit que se volvió viral: "Sí, por favor ilumíname. Envíame un correo electrónico a energíadepenepequeño@consígueteunavida.com".

La respuesta de los internautas no se hizo esperar.

"Este es el tipo de respuesta que ahora te seguirá para siempre", escribió un usuario de Twitter, mientras que otra bromeó: "Aquí Thunberg bajando la temperatura global congelando absolutamente a Tate".

El atleta intentó devolver el golpe, publicando una extraña respuesta en video de dos minutos en la que fumaba un cigarro y un ayudante invisible le servía pizza.

"Gracias por confirmar a través de su dirección de correo electrónico que tienes un pene pequeño @GretaThunberg", escribió en un mensaje que acompaña al video.

Su historia dio un giro inesperado este jueves cuando se supo que fiscales de Rumania detuvieron a Tate y a su hermano, bajo sospecha de tráfico de personas, violación y organización de grupo criminal.

Después del arresto de Tate, Thumberg tuiteó: "Esto es lo que sucede cuando no reciclas tus cajas de pizza".

[rogue-driv3r]

It's been a while since my last rant about automotive industry, but here we go again.

As a premise, i must say that this will probably be more valid for EU than for the rest of the world. Also expect a LONG post. So.

Hybrids and EVs are surely more efficient and "clean" than the average ICE car. But, as a car enthusiast, i'm very aware that technology end efficiency are expensive, definitely not for everyone. Here where i live we get bonuses for changing old cars with brand new "eco-friendly" ones, but only if they are old enough. Bonuses that, anyway, even in best cases will cover less than a quarter of the price of a new vehicle.

Most importantly, and that's something i learned the hard way, no institution will give you a single cent for the running costs - and they're high running costs. And about (stupidly heavy) EVs, electricity now is so expensive that the cost-per-km is the same of regular gasoline, so no real advantage. I remember when the seller told us that the simplicity of the powertrain meant less service costs, it was quite the opposite. Moreover, we were forced to service the car at their shop, at their prices, because they were the only ones who knew how to work on those components. Oh, and it was the only way to keep the warranty valid on expensive parts, too.

I had a (second hand) hybrid, like my parents. But i went from precarious worker to student and i'm unable to find a proper job while i'm studying due to some issues with my mental health, so my income suddenly dropped to zero. Keeping the car is expensive and in three years, when the warranty expires, the value will decrease drastically (a new battery could cost until 8k euros, nobody would buy a car with that risk). So i planned ahead and sold the hybrid car to get a cheaper one with decent quality and safety, reasonable running costs, free from the blackmail of our official dealer and easily fixable by any mechanic.

The problem: the most reliable and most fuel-saving version of that model on the second-hand car market (and well, basically the only one i found nearby) was a Diesel one. And Diesels are EU's scapegoat for the increasing air pollution, so Countries are forced to make laws to stay within certain limits - that's not bad itself. The problem is that private cars, depending on the sources, are only between 10% and 20% of the total greenhouse gas emissions.

But it's easier to wage war against citizens than corporations who are truly responsible for that 80-90%. And i'm not talking about those wealthy citizens who already got their fancy Tesla, but those who literally can't afford a new car (for any reason). This is a class problem.

There are "old" Diesel cars which still require less fuel than modern, high-end Diesels that satisfy the new requirements for mass production. A 10 years old 1.4 Diesel will always require less fuel and pollute less than a 2-tonne mild-hybrid "environmentally friendly" 3.0 Diesel BMW or Audi. Oh wait, it gets better: ironically an Euro 5 Diesel could be stopped from traffic while a brand new 1500 hp quad-turbo W16 Bugatti Chiron can roam around in the city centre on the very same day. But hey, the Chiron is not an evil Diesel. Once again, this. Is. A. Class. Problem.

Forcing people to go hybrid/electric with restrictions is repression against low-income classes. There could be so much more that can be done if private transport really is the root of all evil. Like a bonus that covers 100% the price of a new car (oh btw, an Euro 5 Diesel is old enough to get stopped on certain conditions, but not old enough to receive a bonus). Or investing in bio/synthetic fuels so people can run their older cars with carbon neutral emissions - but that'd make the poor automakers angry as they couldn't sell their new hypertechnological cars. Or provide new catalysts for free to install on older cars - but also that would make automakers quite angry. Or governments could also consider doing something about intensive farming (y'know, that thing that sends methane into atmosphere which is 84 times worse for global warming than CO2), or better public transport, or heavy industry, or invest in nuclear so we can stop burning fossil fuels for energy (i know this is gonna cause a shitstorm lmao, i believe safely stocking radioactive material under layers of rocks in sterile zones is better than keeping on produce greenhouse gases), or anything that doesn't involve the private life of people already struggling with ever-increasing prices of goods.

"B-but there are exceptions to traffic restrictions" sure, but it's hard to satisfy all of the requirements. One of them is quite easy to get anyway: it's a certificate that you're on the route from home to work or viceversa - you can pollute if you produce. Using an old car for free-time? Nope. Getting groceries? Nope. Sounds dystopic as hell, innit?

Don't get me wrong, technology and research are good, hybrids and EVs are fascinating and surely relatively more efficient. But not affordable by everyone, nor a permanent solution for environmental problems: not only for batteries, but also for the energy required to charge them, and the fossil fuels still needed for hybrids. A lot of research is still needed but, while we wait, we should stop pointing the finger at who can't afford to buy and sustain a new car.

Now, i know what you're thinking: "but you could've got another non-Diesel model and save even more money" maybe you're right, but for me the choice of the car is very personal and important, there are many criteria i have, picking any cheap shitbox is not an option for me if i have a decent budget. Laws can change, safety and reliability don't. There are good cars out there which only problem is bad laws made against them. Cars that can perfectly run and could end up in a junkyard only because of these laws, that's the opposite of sustainability, that's forced consumerism. Plus, it's not only about me, but also and most importantly about the millions of people that get screwed everyday and have no fucking choice.

[en-wheelz-me]

[carsthatnevermadeitetc]

What a difference 60 years makes juxtaposition of Aston Martin DB5 Vantage Convertible, 1963 & Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster, 2023. AML have revealed the first Vantage Roadster to feature a 5.2-litre V12 Twin-Turbo powertrain. Production will be limited to 249 examples globally, there were only 13 DB5 Vantage Convertibles though some open-roof DB5s have been converted to Vantage spec. The DB5 Vantage′s 4.0-litre DOHC straight-6 produced 330PS, the quad-cam 60-deg 5.2-litre V12 fitted to the Vantage Roadster makes 700PS

[things-about-cars-in-posts]

thoughts on the BMW *inhale* B57D30S0 engine (a.k.a. the 50d motor)? y'know, the diesel one with the 4 turbo's.

It also seems to be quite common (at least where I live) for how silly it sounds on paper. Like, I see 50d-badged Bimmers on a weekly basis.

I can tell you, for one, that I should start setting up donations for my blog, considering if quad-turbo 5.0 liter BMWs are that common where you live a buck probably matters more to me than you XD

That aside... I honestly cannot figure out what it is for. Whoever is getting a 5.0 BMW is miles past any point where fuel economy is any concern at all, so what is the point? Performance? I mean, sure, short of getting involved with Alpina or such tuners you have no way to top 760N/m of torque, but who cares about torque enough to spring for a quad-turbo inline six and cares about horsepower little enough not to get the petrol V8 and literally get 99% of the torque and 32% more power? I can't imagine much of an advantage in noise (especially nowadays that it seems the noise luxury cars make is just whatever you want them to), nor any price differential that would matter to anyone buying such a car new.

I mean, one reason my mind would normally go to is driving excitement, but hell, the most exciting car it was ever mounted on was a 5-series, and far be it from me to say a large sedan can't be exciting, but I mean...

...look at this POV. Every second of this video I am asking myself "So what" and I am not seeing a ton of compelling answers. This is not even the most exciting way to go real fast in a specced-out current-gen 5-series, so what's the point? My only guess is to make going 260 the least exciting experience possible. And I understand that can be appealing to some but I am usually on the exact opposite end of the spectrum. (Usually. I do love me a good E38L V12.)

So for me, this 50d is best left off. Especially because then it spells 50d Off and I am a baby so that's funny to me.

[diabolus1exmachina]

DC Avanti.  

This is the first mid-engined supercar designed, engineered and built in India, for Indians. It's called the DC Avanti and the work of Dilip Chhabria – designer and founder of DC Design – a company better known for building concept cars and prototypes. The build quality is seriously flimsy in places – notably the door handles, cut from the world’s thinnest plastic, the spindly steering wheel and the Renault-sourced six-speed manual’s oddly long gear lever, which is a shame because the shift quality isn’t bad at all. The seats are covered in plasticky leather with more plasticky coloured stripes stitched on top. The sat-nav is an aftermarket plug-in and the digital instrument cluster does a job, but what’s the point in a digital display if you can’t alter the information or layout you’re looking at? By far the biggest issue in here is headroom. That’s the problem with raising the ride height to 170mm (just 30mm less than a Jaguar E-Pace), but keeping the overall height to 1200mm (just 30mm taller than a Lamborghini Huracán).

The chassis, developed in-house, is a steel space frame with the emphasis on keeping things beefy rather than light – hence a 1,580kg kerbweight despite carbon-fibre body panels. Twin that with the jacked-up ride height and you can see this is a supercar built very much with India's pitted road network in mind.

No W16 quad turbo here - in the interests of keeping costs down, DC made the wise decision to buy in a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo from Renaultsport. Yep, the same engine as the old Megane RS, available in two states of tune: 250bhp and 310bhp, the latter available with an automated manual and paddles.

[usafphantom2]

Why is it so difficult to replace the C-130 Hercules?

Fernando Valduga

The Lockheed C-130 Hercules, a tactical air transport aircraft, is a project from the 1950s. The first flight was made on August 23, 1954, but the plane only entered service in the American Air Force (USAF) two years later, more precisely on December 9, 1956, with a test order of two devices.

By 2015, 2,500 devices had already been produced. This robust and versatile aircraft already has nine different versions and is present in several armed branches of 68 countries, such as Portugal, Canada, Brazil, Norway, Greece, Poland, Sweden, France, among many others.

First prototype of the C-130 Hercules.

Between 1964 and 1992, Lockheed increased the Hercules family by producing the civil version, which is also able to fulfill several tasks similar to those of military models.

The civil version of the Hercules, the Lockheed L-100 "N1130E", in flight. Both stern motors are turned off and the propellers are flag-driven. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

In the 1970s, the attempt to find a successor to the veteran Hercules C-130 led the then competitors Boeing and McDonnell Douglas (now incorporated into Boeing itself) to design, respectively, the prototypes YC-14 and YC-15.

Boeing YC-14.

McDonnell Douglas YC-15.

The first, with an innovative design of a twin-engine aircraft with turbofan engines on the wings (reducing, this time, like the A-10 Thunderbolt II attack plane, the inconveniences of "ingestion", by its turbojets, of debris in rudimentary and unpaved runways), while the second, with classic design of a four-engine turbofan

The challenge of replacing the C-130, to Lockheed Martin's happiness, was not, however, successful. The USAF Tactical Air Command refused the projects for various reasons, but mainly because of the difficulty of a motor plane to perform the landing and takeoff missions on unprepared (or improvised) runways in the middle of the desert, jungle or any other inappropriate place.

In 1979, the unsuccessful attempt to rescue 66 U.S. hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran clearly showed the relative unfeasibility (or, at the very least, the disadvised) regarding the use of reaction-engine aircraft for the type of operation to which the C-130 was primarily intended.

The damage caused by the desert sand, - due to the need to make a "floating taxiing" of the RH-53 helicopters (flying a short distance at low speed and altitude) - ended up causing a USAF combat controller, trying to direct the maneuver from the front of the aircraft, to be hit by the desert sand thrown by the rotor, forcing it to move away

Although the accident was not directly caused by the ingestion of sand in the air intakes of the turbines of the engines of the Hercules themselves, the accident itself and the difficulties of the operations in the desert (at that time very little known to the U.S. military) ended up leading the mission to failure, advising the realization of numerous updates of this aviation icon, which allowed the success as the reasons for the failure of Operation Tabas, also hinder operations in that environment of constant "sand storms").

Still in an attempt to replace the revered Lockheed Martin (but also to nationalize an important air vector of military transport), Embraer developed the KC-390, an aircraft driven by two IAE V2500-E5 turbojets similar to the design of the C-14 twin engine, but with engine positioning equivalent to the design of the C-15 quad engine, which reaches the maximum

On the other hand, the only Hercules model in production, the C-130J Super Hercules comes equipped with four Rolls Royce AE 2100 D3 turbo-propeller engines, reaches up to 670 km/h, has a range of 3,300 km and transports up to 20 tons.

If we are going to make a quick and simple comparison, the Embraer plane comes out ahead in several aspects, it is faster; it carries more weight and has the larger cargo compartment. Still, the legendary Lockheed remains, for the time being, unsurpassed in terms of resistance and solidity. Able to perform different works such as air refueling, search and rescue, launch of paratroopers, cargo transport, fire fighting and help in humanitarian causes, the KC-390 is not yet such an obvious substitute for the protagonist Super Hercules.

It is true to state that for certain types of mission the use of the KC-390 (mixed load and tank version) will be more appropriate than its Hercules KC-130 equivalent; on the other hand, it will have limitations in relation to the greater robustness of turboprop engines for operations on rudimentary runways, despite the advanced development of peculiar systems, such as those employed

The newly launched Embraer, despite its greater speed and load capacity, will not, however, necessarily - to the manufacturer's relative misfortune -, be the future replacement for the immense (worldal) fleet of C-130 aircraft and will hardly achieve the reliability and durability of this aviation icon present in the four corners of the planet (and it is not even its ultimate goal).

We can conclude that, to a certain extent, these aircraft do not compete directly with each other, but in many respects complement each other, although for the Brazilian Air Force (in particular) it is an interesting and special substitute, especially for the issue of the complete nationalization of equipment and export marketing capacity.

Reis Friede - Professor Emeritus of the School of Command and Chief of the Army (ECEME), Honorary Professor of the School of Command and General Staff of Aeronautics (ECEMAR), Professor Emeritus of the School of Improvement of Army Officers (EsAO) and Special Lecturer of the School of War (ESG).

[allovertheplaceee]

Best Smartphones to buy under Rs. 20,000 in 2023 (January - February edition)

Hey there,

If you're surfing through the internet in search of a new phone for yourself or to gift someone then, you've come at the right place!

If your budget is under Rs.20k then don't worry, I've got you covered :)

Redmi Note 11 pro

First up we have the Redmi note 11 Pro, this isn't surprising cuz redmi has been releasing really good smartphones lately. It's an absolute value for money at this price!

Key features -

The 6.67" FHD+ 120Hz AMOLED display along with 360Hz touch sampling and 1200 nits peak brightness, brings out immersive picture quality and ensures smoother and faster response. Display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5

The quad camera setup with flagship 108MP HM2 sensor, 8MP Ultra-Wide sensor, 2MP Macro and 2MP depth sensor ensures flawless photography. The 108MP camera delivers images with crystal clear clarity even when zoomed in. The four cameras work together to bring out the best images in all scenarios

The 67W fast charger that comes in the box, powers the massive 5000mAh battery to 50% in less than 15 mins which gives you enough power to last the entire day

The powerful Mediatek Helio G96 SoC ensures excellent gaming and smooth day-to-day performance. The Liquidcool technology ensures that your phone remains cool even while running intensive tasks

The dual stereo speakers setup brings out loud and balanced audio from the device, making the gaming, multimedia experience extremely captivating

Get 2 months of YouTube Premium free!

Cons -

there are barely any cons this phone has but one would be the little bit of bloatware it has left in the MIUI software, other than that this is phone is an absolute beast.

2. Redmi Note 12 5G

Next up we have another redmi phone and, this is the latest offering by redmi. This would've been the best phone in this list if it wasn't overpriced for its specs.

Key features -

Display: Super AMOLED (1080x2400) Display with 120Hz Refresh rate; 1200nits peak brightness; 240Hz Touch sampling rate

Processor: Snapdragon 4 Gen1 6nm Octa-core 5G processor for high performance and efficiency with Adreno 619 GPU; Up to 2.0GHz

Camera: 48MP AI Triple camera setup with 8MP Ultra Wide sensor and 2MP Macro camera| 13MP Front camera

Battery: 5000mAh large battery with 33W fast charger in-box and Type-C connectivity

Memory, Storage & SIM: 4GB RAM | 128GB UFS 2.2 storage expandable up to 1TB | Dual SIM (nano+nano) Dual 5G (5G+5G)

Cons -

There aren't really much cons about this phone other than it's pricing. Overall a great smartphone for it's price.

3.iQOO Z6 Pro 5G

Really good smartphone by iQOO and it'll fulfill every smartphone need of yours without a hiccup. Fast and smooth is the motto of this phone and it lives up to it.

Key features -

Snapdragon 778G comes with octa-core processor that adopts the 6nm process and Kryo 670 architecture.

66W FlashCharge

Liquid Cooling system intelligently sense the heat source and adapt the optimal cooling solution, thereby effectively cool down the phone and reduce the CPU temperature by 12 degrees and surface temperature by 3 degree.

Equipped with 64MP triple camera system, 8MP Wide-angle camera, 2MP Macro camera

iQOO Z6 Pro 5G display provides immersive visual experience with true color contrast and a peak brightness of 1300 nits. HDR10+ helps in providing right color tone mapping for each scene. The display offers 90Hz refersh rate and 180Hz Touch Sampling Rate for a smooth touch response.

Cons -

Y'all maybe wondering why this is below redmi 12 so my answer to that question is - This phone has Mediocre software and the touch sampling rate could've been better. Also the original price of this phone is way above the budget so, if u can catch during the sale right now then you'll get your money's worth.

4. OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G

Next up on the list we have the Oneplus Nord CE Lite 2 5G. This phone lives up to its brand's reputation and doesn't disappoint us. It's got all the goodies you'll need in a smartphone in this price segment.

Key Features -

Camera: 64MP Main Camera with EIS; 2MP Depth Lens and 2MP Macro Lens; Front (Selfie) Camera: 16MP Sony IMX471

Camera Features: AI scene enhancement, Dual-View Video, HDR, Night Portrait, Panorama Mode, Retouch Filters, 1080p video at 30 fps, SLO-MO: 720p video at 120 fps, TIME-LAPSE: 1080p video at 30 fps, Video editor, Face unlock, Screen flash, HDR, NIGHT, PORTRAIT, TIME-LAPSE, Retouch, Filters

Display: 6.59 Inches; 120 Hz Refresh Rate; Support sRGB, Display P3; Resolution: 2412 x 1080 pixels 402ppi; Aspect Ratio: 20:9

Display Features: Dark mode

Operating System: Oxygen OS based on Android 12

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

Battery & Charging: 5000 mAh with 33W SuperVOOC

Cons -

All though the phone is good, it's battery life isn't as great as it's redmi competitors and another thing which spoils the reputation of this phone is the new OxygenOS 13 which is buggy sometimes and the OG Oneplus fans aren't happy abt this either cuz OxygenOS is turning into RealmeUI.

5. Realme Narzo 50 Pro 5G

Last up we have the Realme Narzo 50 pro 5G. Overall it's a good package and will get your daily needs done unless you like taking a lot of photos and videos then i wouldn't recommend this phone for that. Its not that it can't take good pics or videos but, it's competitors can take better ones.

Key Features -

Mediatek Dimensity 920 5G powerful Gaming Processor

6 GB RAM | 128 GB ROM | Expandable Upto 256 GB

16.3 cm (6.4 inch) FHD+ Display

48MP + 8MP + 2MP | 16MP Front Camera

5000 mAh Battery

Cons -

Mediocre cameras and display and an average phone overall.

Although most of these are smartphones from 2022, they are still really good! But if you can, wait a few more months so that you can buy the new releases from these brands. With that we come to the end of this list and I hope y'all found this helpful.