THE ARCHMAGE OF KATOLIS
THE REVENGE OF ELTUREL
THE DOOM OF XADIA
ALL HAIL CLAUDIA, THE BLACK-EYED SUN
I'm very invested in Claudia and her dark magic journey. Ever since the end of S3 I've envisioned her getting so powerful she becomes the first dark archmage. She could be a beacon of hope and magical freedom for humanity - and a horrible plague onto Xadia, conquering it in service of the Aaravos's/her father's cause.
(Although right now the second part is more likely than the first.)
493 notes
·
View notes
People are gonna be fighting over your Sammy soon and I will be one of those people
This is getting out of hand.
191 notes
·
View notes
Why we should stop comparing The Secret History and If We Were Villains
I've seen people putting the two books together as pillars of dark academia countless times, often trying to explain why their favourite one is the best and it is useless. The two books are incredibly different and you will inevitably be disappointed in one of the two if you read them with the same intentions.
The Secret History is a reversed mystery novel: from the very first lines, we know who died, how, and who killed him. The questions we are left with are "Why did they do that?", and "Will they get away with that?"
The book is fundamentally psychological, it's a character-driven book, which explains why such a long part is dedicated to establishing them, their relationships, while the actual murder is surprisingly short.
If We Were Villains, on the other hand, is a more traditional detective novel, though it doesn't totally fit the standard. It's a whodunit, and when we start the book, we know who got arrested but the mystery throughout the novel follows four questions: "Who died?", "Who did it?", "Why did they do it?" and "Why did Oliver get arrested?" We are trying to solve the murder at the same time as the detective.
It's a plot-driven novel, and although the characters are very important, they are all defined by one quality and one flaw during the first act (the characterisation in this book is amazing, I'm probably gonna make a post about it).
Obviously, if you read TSH and IWWV with the same expectations, one of them is going to bore you. However, if you consider their differences, they are both excellent books in their genre.
If they do have some common elements (a group of students that's almost sectarian, and murder), saying that IWWV plagiarized TSH sounds pretty ridiculous to me. IWWV is a love letter to Shakespeare and the madness in his characters, TSH is a critic of elitism in academic spaces.
And they both deserve praise, if only people would stop comparing them.
707 notes
·
View notes
I feel like we know more about Sarcean’s hair in the past than we know about Sarcean himself
I lost count of how many times I read lines about that silky dark shining smooth spreading beautiful inky long flowing gorgeous alluring fine elegant mane of his
201 notes
·
View notes