Wasn't Steampaw the cat mentioned to have liked cardinals?
Is Coyotekit basically them reborn or something? I see a lot of red feathers and I AM A SUCKER for symbolism.
OR DID STEAMPAW PULL A QUIET WHERE THEY CONFUSED COYOTEKIT FOR PINE!!! Sorry huge fan of all this.
:)
(THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE SUPPORT AAA!! I LOVE HEARING ANYONES THOUGHTS ON THIS TY)
84 notes
·
View notes
do you like cassie or do you only like her when you can name her as "gregorys friend that probably dies"
10 notes
·
View notes
Help(less)
Summary :
Senjurou works at Douma's office, and learns to help. Senjurou works at Douma's office, and learns that he can't do anything at all. Senjurou works, and learns that closure is something only some ghosts can give.
(He wants to become more like Kyoujurou, more like Douma, more like Michikatsu. Wants to be someone the dead and the living can rely on.)
>read on AO3
>AU tag
7 notes
·
View notes
idk dude like i do not care abt the pkmn company losing money becos they're being "ripped off" by palworld
(1. palworld will not outsell pkmn and its silly to think that 2. i want more competition for monster-collecting games becos the monopoly pkmn has has given us some unfinished, buggy messes)
its less abt pkmn designs being "ripped off" and more abt how unoriginal and slapped together the pals are. like it's honestly kinda a shame that the monsters in this new monster-collecting game don't really have their own identity. like when I look i them I dont think about palworld, I dont think of them as pals, I think of pokemon. Thats uh. not great imo?
its extra sucks becos I see the pals that are original and theyre good!! I usually really like those designs!! There was something there but the game relies too much on the familiarity of pokemon's designs and i just feel indifferent at best and kinda 😕gyeh at worst
im also comparing it to cassette beasts, another (very good) monster collecting game that appeals to me as a pokemon fan, but absolutely stands on its own and exists completely separate from pokemon because of its unique designs and unique takes on some pokemon formula things.
Like sorry to compare but: the beasts in cassette beasts are clearly identifiable and there's a design philosophy going on there. And although I can easily pick out a pal from a pokemon, I'm not thinking of the pal, im thinking of the pokemon parts its made from. honestly its just not great design imo ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
11 notes
·
View notes
I saw you going insane in the tags and figure I'd give you this idea to work off from:
In double life, having had her loyalty scorned by Scott, she doesn't actually try to win it back at any point. She just tries her hardest to take everything from him (she uses his slip to take ownership of his house but beyond quoting that exact line always refers to it exclusively as *her house* not their house as well as making many attempts to get Cleo to stay with her, even when rabid she never attacked Cleo first,) attempted to make him suffer as much as possible (mostly through the powdered snow but also often in other ways,) and when they had seemingly made up she told him to his face that she planned to betray him and join the other side, so she is unflinching loyal but also incredibly vengeful if that loyalty is tossed away and discarded.
LITERALLY. SHE DRIVES ME SO FUCKING CRAZY I CANT WITH THIS. its almost like she embodies the parts of scott and cleo people associate them with and went absolutely batshit hogwild with it. scott's unwavering loyalty + cleo's bloodthirsty vengeance + pearl's own tendency to fixate ALL that shit towards one and a half of a person and be fucking unhinged while doing it = whatever the fuck dl!pearl was on. she forgives scott at the very last minute when she thinks scott gave up the victory for her BUT by the time limlife comes around you can tell shes not completely over it. like i fucking cant with these two. i CANNOT. the way the two of them work how when together they're unstoppable and loyal to the bitter end but simply by the nature of how they are once betrayed their relationship can NEVER go back to the way it once was. they're two sides of the same coin. pearl is devoted the way scott is loyal and scott is petty the way pearl is vengeful.
like seriously just typing this out i just realised??? the traits many people associate with scott???? how petty he is and how loyal he is???? pearl has it too. the thing with her is that with her she takes it to the extreme and always to one person only. just take a look at her and impulse in limlife. impulse kills her once(1) and she DOES NOT let go of that grudge for the rest of the entire fucking series. im not joking rewatch the whole fucking thing again and count the number of times she declares wanting to kill impulse after the boogie kill. scott might do it more frequently but when pearl hates someone shes never letting that shit go
and the fact that she dies this season, underwater, stabbed by scott, trashing around and yelling "this isnt fair"? i wonder if that's another grudge she'll be keeping for a lifetime
33 notes
·
View notes
ok 3 seconds to be a little pissy and pretensions about the last reblog, i kinda dislike how fandom engages with media transformatively????? theres just something wrong about it to me with posts like that. the way people make jokes like "why is this weird au so good??" "why is this persons version of the character so different??" like???? and the way that post has people defensive about their right to do something with a character outside of whats established because they yknow, like the character????
"you either know everything about the character or the version you like of them is completely incoherent with canon" is such a weird ass dichotomy. like maybe i know everythnig about a character and i want to expand even more on them, or i think theyre so interesting as their own unit i want to put them in a different context and see how they work. maybe i like them as a sort of thematic object or symbol and i want to bend that? like theres a lot of reasons why someone's interpretation/take on a character may be different besides "you just made them up". like people can appreciate something's text and then expand on it like???
im not fussing about that on op's post cause im most definitely reading way to into it. its just a dumb pet peeve.
12 notes
·
View notes