#Freedom theory
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
axos-oddities · 19 days ago
Text
Exasperated
Heaving with pain
Like I've been dragged out of a river. Ripped and teared.
The wounds will never heal. Always the horrible pain will be there to forever haunt my once pretty dreams
THE FREEDOM THEORY - WITH GREAT GREED COMES GREAT PAIN FOR ANOTHER. CHAPTER ONE
The talks of men hit off the walls of my head like painful pings. Who are they? Why do they stand over me with happiness in their eyes when I'm not smiling. Like they've struck gold. The air smells like bleach and bad decisions. Like a dental office gone wrong. The bed I'm on feels like bricks. I need up. I need out.
I try to stand. Pain shooting up my spine.
"She's awake? How? So soon?" A white haired dog..wolf thing looking creature on hind legs with a skull like visage and blue eyes said confused.
"Better question how is she alive?" A human man said, looking down at me in disbelief
"Of course she's alive! My methods always come out smoothly!" A shorter grey haired wolf creature said with an ego that seemed to be bigger than him. "Look at her..she's perfect!"
Perfect? Not Perfectly fine I can say that much.
"Who? What?..why..who are you?" I said confused, like formulating a thought was a chore.
"Let's let her rest..she seems..out of it.." the blue eyed lady said as she backed away and left the room with the human.
"Oh alright! Bye bye my sweet child." The short man-wolf said as he kissed me on the forehead. Much like a father would and left. He was no father.
So no explanation? Great first impression.
I looked down at my own body for a moment to see why I felt so much in pain. I looked much like the doggy people that visited me. Black skin..my hands much more like claws with rough pads..not human but I was no dog.
I was..who was I? I'm a kid? Right? A human kid?
Name? Blank
Memories? Mostly blank
All I could recall was being loaded into a car..with a woman! Yes! That..I think was my mom..for a deal she said...why did she bring me here? Ain't mom's supposed to not leave you with strangers..moms are supposed to protect you..love you.
Did she not love me?
Did she abandon me?
Why?
1 note · View note
beatsheetromanroy · 7 months ago
Text
EVANGELICALS, FANATICS, AND ZEALOTS, OH MY!
298 notes · View notes
thediaryofarevolutionist · 7 months ago
Text
I feel the pain of every woman who was born into this world so no I can't let it go
169 notes · View notes
dosesofcommonsense · 7 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
The entire Bush clan is part of the NWO.
If you dive further down the rabbit hole, there are some alarming theories. George Bush originated in Nazi Germany and immigrated to America and changed his name. His son, George W., was in Nikola Tesla’s lab; Nikola named him Curious George…which was the name that inspired Curious George and The Man in the Yellow Hat.
Whether that’s true or not, I don’t know. I do know the Patriot Act that arose off the US Government attacking its own country to hide stolen money and gold was nothing helpful to US Citizens. The Patriot Act sounded good in name while ceding individual rights, liberties, and freedoms for the greater good…if it sounds like Hitler, Grindelwald, and Voldemort, you’re right…America’s “representatives” sold its citizenry for control. We traded freedom for safety and got neither.
215 notes · View notes
barbiegirldream · 1 month ago
Text
I know it's popular fanon that Barbatos did not want to fight in Khaenri'ah and rejected the orders to destroy the kingdom etc... but I don't think that's the case. I think the seven were divided, and that's why so many fell at Khaenri'ah. But I don't think Barbatos stood against destruction or voted for peace or anything like it.
Because at the end of his archon quest, Venti tells us these things:
The Seven do not always get along, but it's seemingly unprecedented to attack another archon and take their Gnosis.
Venti wanted the Seven and their nations to deal with the abyss the first time. And since he mentioned the catastrophe from 500 years ago that's Khaenri'ah.
Venti wanted the Tsaritsa's army (the strongest army) to help fight the abyss and is frustrated? she is using it for personal gain...
Venti knew The Tsaritsa well once, but is entirely befuddled by her actions now.
Barbatos likely viewed the destruction of Khaenri'ah as a method of destroying the abyss.
Venti currently sees the Harbingers as being gifted power they're using irresponsibly and sees a potential for their military force. Which is interesting with the Paralogism quest and how we know Venti is deeply involved with the ongoings of his military.
My personal guess is that the Tsaritsa became offended at the suggestion that the Seven should use their people in a war against the abyss. If it were Barbatos's idea, it would explain why he feels targeted and the others just shrug and give up their gnosis.
78 notes · View notes
burningcheese-merchant · 23 days ago
Note
I don’t know if you’ve ever talked about this before, but what do you think of the Silent Salt is Elder Faerie theory? Personally, I think it’s an interesting idea, but since I’m a Silentlily shipper, I hope that if it’s true that they’ll emphasize how Silent Salt is truly different from Elder Faerie.
It's funny that I waited to answer this ask in particular, considering what we just got shown in episode 10 lol
Tumblr media Tumblr media
I had never bought into the theory before. idk, I never really got it. Like, I didn't understand where it came from. Is it just because of their armor? Half of the characters in this series wear armor and their sets aren't THAT different from each other. I suppose there is (was lol) that idea that Silent Salt was the split personality of Elder Faerie in the same way Dark Enchantress is half of White Lily, which is a sort of cool parallel, but... idk. The whole thing just seemed like a whole lot of reaching to me. Just never clicked. I couldn't make it make sense inside of my mind
And now I am vindicated lol. Silent Salt is decidedly NOT Elder Faerie, as per canon. They met, they spoke, Salt played a hand in planting the Silver Tree (what the hell?????). They're two separate people and that's that. That theory has been put out to pasture. Can't say I'll miss it lol. But I'm sorry to those who are disappointed
67 notes · View notes
its-terf-or-nothin · 1 month ago
Text
Always be wary of people who want to restrict your access to information. There are never good intentions behind that. People who are confident they’re correct are not going to discourage you from educating yourself about what the other side says.
As an atheist, I hate The Bible, Quran, Tanaka and all other religious books, they’re racist, misogynistic garbage. However, I still think these books should be accessible for all, studies show that the people most educated about religion actually lean agnostic or atheist. If religious people actually read their entire religious book(s), instead of only their favorite parts of the book(s), many people would leave their religion, religion is a symptom of a combination of people not being informed enough about what religious people believe and not reading enough of their religious books. Reading religious books is also beneficial not just for people who are religious, that may deconvert the more they become educated, but people who are already atheists too, the more we read, the easier it is to debunk the disinformation and misinformation that religious people spread.
As a radical feminist, I also dislike transgender ideology, however, if you’re a radical feminist, I will actively encourage you to read books that have a pro-transgender stance, listen to transgender voices and scroll through social media and view pro-transgender rhetoric. Similar to religious people, I think the more transgender people and their allies talk, the more they expose themselves as being unsympathetic, misogynistic, victim-blamers, lacking thoughtfulness, etc.
60 notes · View notes
fuggnuckets · 2 years ago
Text
They praised Cuties
They stayed silent on Weinstein for decades
They hung around with Epstein
They defended Polanski
They ignored Balenciaga
But they actively attack sound of freedom because the film based on a true story “supports dangerous conspiracies”
Hollywood is doing a real good fucking job at disproving the conspiracies
2K notes · View notes
2036sator · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
[[ im back!!!!!!!!!! not that my exams are over , just the hard ones so i'll be posting art soon !! for now i'll just put this one ere ]]
189 notes · View notes
euanslauner · 6 months ago
Text
VICTIM = FREEDOM GUY THEOREH???
Ok so yknow that one AvA stickfigure in one of the earlier episodes of Ava, Freedom Guy
Ive been having this headcanon since the Wanted Episode that he was and is Victim and now I genuinely want to crawl in a hole because that would've been PERFECT?!
Victim himself knows what its like to be abused and trapped by cursors, and obviously after meeting Mitsi and the community, he learns there are other stickfigures out there. I genuinely believe Alan simply forgot about Freedom Guy to time because it just makes so much sense. Plus, he has a company doesn't he? RocketCorp I thunketh.
Its just so in character for him to make that ad and so sad because that ad litterally cost him his wife, since it was motivation for TCO to free himself (or at least by luck somehow he ended up freeing himself)
HONESTLY IM SHRIEKING
THE GREY TEXT?? GREY = VICTIM BRO IDGAF ITS CANON
Victim is also a technician or something so he definitely would find a way to code something like this to help others in the same situation yeah thats a wrap its canon atp.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
96 notes · View notes
theriverdraws · 5 months ago
Text
If Woody theory ends up being real, I will truly feel a new connection with Kris as a character like never before, because I too will be extremely horrified and unable to react at the images being projected into my eyes.
99 notes · View notes
local-lamppost · 7 months ago
Text
Maddie and Caitlyn and Piltover
Probably the most jarring twist of the Act was Maddie and Caitlyn's relationship. It seemed very sudden, until you take a look into the few lines from her in Act 1 and realize they all centered around Caitlyn. That Maddie was the first Piltie to 'dedicate her heart' to Caitlyn with Noxus. Maddie likes Vi because Caitlyn vouched for her and deems her 'one of the good ones' because of Caitlyn.
Let's talk about Maddie: she's an average young Piltie. She's Cait's age, give or take, and feels hurt both by the recent Zaun attacks and Marcus' betrayl. Caitlyn is the first person after all this that is trying to do something to fix the mess. Cait's a Kiramman, an inspiration, a fighter, and kinda sorta pretty. Maddie was starry eyed by Cait and couldn't see any problems with her actions or flaws because of this. When given the option to have Cait lead, she jumps at the chance.
Maddie is something of a trick with her introduction. She doesn't have a personal stake like Vi or Cait, isn't there to look after her new buddy like Loris (until told otherwise he is there just cause he is Vi's old man friend); she believes in combating Jinx. Peacekeeping in Zaun with gas and hextech weapons to go after one person, but oh isn't she so cute? Introduced in a halo of sunlight and being so sweet to Vi?
Maddie is a proud Piltie, who feels betrayed by Marcus and the Undercity, who wants to punish them and rebuild her home in topside. And yes, she feels betrayed by the Undercity, she consider's it a part of Piltover one way or another, and most topsider's are ignorant of why Zaunites are so upset with them. To Maddie, these attacks came out of left field.
What's interesting is that Maddie is anti-Ambessa, or at least pro-Caitlyn. You could see this as her being a moderate. She tells Cait that she can withdraw from Zaun and reestablish the council, but ends that statement by reaffirming Caitlyn as their leader, "The Enforcers, Piltover... I follow you". Cait and her military rule makes Maddie feel safe and proud in her city.
Onto Cait. Yeah, Cait's not necessarily using Maddie, but she is utilizing her. She's learned from her percieved mistakes/weaknesses and is keeping her work and personal life seperate. They have sex and talk about the state of the city, but Cait never talks about her feelings with Maddie as she did with Vi. Cait's an emotional person too. She was always quick to express herself to Vi, to Ekko, to her mother and father, to Jayce; but she is hurt and alone and can contribute both of those facts to her emotions (sans Jayce).
Begs the question of why Cait is sleeping with Maddie? But even that is simply her coping. It's her version of Vi drinking and fighting. It's stress relief and a quick way to at least make someone else happy. Cait also likes touch, so it stands to reason she'd find someone in her isolated state (Vi pushed away, father a living ghost, Jayce and Mel magiced away). Also, if Word of God is anything to go by, it's not out of character for Cait to find a pretty girl to fool around with.
Cait's main focus is still Jinx. Her mind is literally shown overlapping with her's. Maddie a tryst for the off hours, and even that's kept to the minimum as Cait would rather work than get any rest.
I do wish we could've gotten a scene of Cait replaying her interactions with Vi (think season 1 shower scene), but instead we have Maddie to contrast their relationship. Maddie is kind of the 'Piltover Approved' Vi; she's a red headed enforcer who loves her city, her council, the noble houses, and Caitlyn. She's safe and she's someone that Caitlyn doesn't have to put any excess energy into. Which must be gratifying for the surface levels of Cait's issues. Vi forces Cait to act better, to look inward and reflect, to consider other people and not just her own hurt (something season one Cait wouldn't have even needed another's help with).
The little detail of Vi not calling Cait a cupcake until episode 6 is also telling. At first it's likely Vi realizing the seriousness of everything, but it could also be that she disapproves of Cait's actions. Cait doesn't have that sweetness in her, or at least isn't allowing herself to act on it. When Vi does call her cupcake again it's not an endearment as it was by the end of season one, but a call out to what Cait has become.
Going forward, what's next? Vi and Cait aren't back together, but are together. They have to fight the Noxians (which was hinted at by Maddie herself) and help with the Arcane.
I kinda want Jinx to be the one to spell everything out to Cait; to tear her a new one. Jinx kept an eye on Vi during her pit fighter era, saw the drunk, broken mess that her sister became; a sister she is now on tentatively good terms with and will likely be a bit protective of after Isha. Something like, "I saw what happened to Vi after you guys split, she destroyed herself like you destroyed the city. I always thought I would be the one to break her, but you did a bang up job! Two of us have that in common, hurting Vi, but I'm trying now. So what does that say about you? None of this was Vi's fault, all she was trying to do was keep you from acting like me, ya know, deranged and violent? Huh, Vi-olent."
So in Act 3, Cait needs to be the one to get a kick in the ass and have that conversation with Vi. She needs to own up to her mistakes. How she was guilting Vi into the enforcers, how Vi was right about her loosing control and almost shooting a kid, maybe even for using Vi's affection for her against her. Vi will forgive her, she's Vi and has the self worth of a pebble, so long as Cait takes accountability and starts acting on any promises to change-again, why a shovel talk from Jinx could help set their relationship in the right direction.
136 notes · View notes
t-jfh · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
204 notes · View notes
Text
By: Andrew Doyle
Published: Mar 27, 2025
The University of Oxford is at it again. Somehow forgetting that its function is the pursuit and production of knowledge rather than ideological propagandising, its authorities have decided to modify the Latin passages of the degree ceremony to be gender-neutral. Bye bye, magistri (masters) and doctores (doctors); instead, graduates will be referred to as vos (you). One presumes this is to avoid causing offence to ‘non-binary’ students who happen to specialise in the classics.
On a purely theatrical basis, this stripping away of grandeur is disappointing. One of the most enjoyable aspects of matriculating at Oxford was that we had an excuse to dress up in black capes, and when I later graduated I was permitted to wear the flowing bright red garb of the doctor philosophiae. If I had climbed up to the top of the cupola of the Sheldonian Theatre on that day, I might have been mistaken for an activist from Fathers for Justice.
These anachronistic touches are surely part of the appeal of studying at Oxford. And although a slight modification to the Latin won’t harm anyone – let’s face it, barely anyone would have noticed – it does point to a deeper societal malaise. Like asking someone for one’s pronouns, it’s a little reminder that we are expected to truckle to this intolerant, regressive and identity-obsessed new state religion.
And let’s not forget that the entire notion of ‘non-binary’ is, for the most part, a status symbol for middle-class narcissists. Why should an 800-year-old ceremony be tweaked to satisfy the demands of these little Veruca Salts who wants the whole world to contort in accordance with their preferences? At the time of my graduation at Oxford I was a huge fan of Madonna, but I didn’t insist that the Vice-Chancellor intone: Modo virginis. Tum primum tactae.
Up until relatively recently, ‘coming out’ as ‘non-binary’ was a means by which uber-privileged celebrities could claim some degree of oppression. It was this generation’s most fashionable label, and was embraced by the likes of Same Smith and Demi Lovato. It was only marginally less ridiculous than Danni Minogue claiming she was ‘queer’ and then later clarifying that she wasn’t interested in women sexually, or Michaela Kennedy-Cuomo – daughter of the former governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo – announcing that she was ‘demisexual’. This is defined as someone who only feels sexually attracted to someone if they have an emotional bond, which means that Cuomo had effectively ‘come out’ as an old-fashioned heterosexual.
One cannot ‘come out’ as non-binary. The metaphor of ‘coming out’ is specifically related to the revelation of an innate characteristic that one has kept hidden due to societal disapproval. Up until the 1990s, coming out as gay involved a degree of personal risk; gay people were disowned, disinherited, fired, and sometime physically attacked or killed. Coming out as non-binary, a fashionable and celebrated identity, bears no such risks.
Moreover, homosexuality is a verifiably innate characteristic. It is remarkably easy to determine someone’s sexual orientation by scientific means, and to measure degrees of arousal on the basis of erotic stimuli. There is no apparatus in the world that could measure ‘gender identity’ any more than one could hope to measure where someone falls on the spectrum of mods to rockers. And yet we are expected to treat belief in this will-o’-the-wisp as the equivalent of an inherent sexual orientation or racial group. It’s remarkably insulting to minorities who have been persecuted throughout history.
For the sake of the literal-minded, I should point out that when I say that to be non-binary isn’t real, I do not mean to imply that people who call themselves non-binary do not exist. I am pointing out that identity is not the same as material reality; it is all about self-perception. The claim of being non-binary is not even synonymous with ‘intersex’ (not a third sex or evidence of a ‘spectrum’, but rather a developmental condition that results in sexual ambiguity in males and females).
The identity of ‘non-binary’ is based on the notion that one does not feel aligned with stereotypes of male or female. And so it amounts to a reinforcement of traditional ideals of maleness and femaleness. Rather than acknowledging that men and women can behave and dress as they like, to claim to be ‘non-binary’ implies that if men don’t behave like ‘real men’ and women don’t behave like ‘real women’, they are somewhere in between. It’s an oddly conservative form of rebellion.
This is why the Globe Theatre’s 2022 production of I, Joan, based on the life of Joan of Arc, was so reactionary. It presented Joan as ‘non-binary’ because she was powerful, courageous and wore men’s armour. For the woke, female strength and independence is not to be celebrated, but to be explained away. The same goes for the essay on Queen Elizabeth I that appeared around this time on the Globe’s website, referring to the monarch with ‘they/them’ pronouns on the basis that she rhetorically claimed to have ‘the heart and stomach of a king’.
So when former Coronation Street star Shobna Gulati last week claimed to be ‘non-binary’, she was not ‘coming out’; she was simply declaring her belief in a quasi-supernatural creed. Of course she is entitled to do that, but that doesn’t magically stop her from being a woman. But just as a friturier may announce his fealty to Ukobach, the demon in charge of frying souls in the underworld, there’s no reason for the rest of us to play along.
--
If this was the 90s, they'd be goths. If this was the 00s, they'd be emos.
Tumblr media
I don't believe you're "non-binary" anymore than I believe that Xians are "covered by the blood of Jesus," or that Muhammad flew to heaven on a grotesque mutant donkey.
I don't believe in a biology-independent disembodied sexed essense "gender identity" anymore than I believe in an eternal Xian soul or Xenu and his thetans.
And I don't have to. That's what secularism means.
If your "identity" is invalidated by me not believing in it, then it was never real in the first place.
What I do believe is that nobody believes more strongly in enforcing narrow, rigid sex stereotypes than the people pretending they're breaking them.
41 notes · View notes
assassin-artist · 10 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
you'll never guess what ive been getting into lately
35 notes · View notes
kaeyachi · 9 months ago
Text
Kaeya keeps talking about fate. He keeps mentioning it somehow.
On some occasions, he talks about wanting to change or reject fate - to take a step back or exit the stage. Most of the time, he actually ponders on its inevitability.
It's as if his life is under fate's grip to the point that this "fate" is the reason for everything to him.
To name just a few voicelines off the top of my head:
"-destined to be doomed together" (GAA), " Alas, is this fate's grand design?" (Kaeya story quest)," It's up to the whims of fate." (imaginarium theater)
We, however, have been hearing things about fate for quite some time now...namely the most notable one being the Loom of Fate that was carried by Caribert, an Alberich, for several centuries. It's a specific item(?) that could allegedly alter the leylines and change the story. (change fate, as Kaeya wishes to do)
Finally, Mavuika said, " There are those with the power to see the future. They simply call it by a different name - fate." (5.0 AQ) (fate is inevitable, as Kaeya warns us)
This is making me anxious for him...
111 notes · View notes