#??? what to tag

[scrollonso]

First Kiss (Masterlist)

A strollonso AU where 18 year old rookie Lance Stroll falls helplessly in love with the notoriously mean world champion. (feel free to remake, just credit me!)

(spell checked chapters on ao3)

Introduction

Rough Draft

Bahrain

Malaysia

Filler Chapter

Australia

San Marino

Europe

Spain

Monaco

Britain

Canada

America

France

Germany

FA14's (Late) Birthday

Hungary

Filler Chap 2

Turkey

Italy

China

Japan

Brazil

LS18's Birthday

Extra:

Waiting Room - Pheobe Bridgers

[mrdynamite777]

Reblog with the last 3 songs you listened to and tag some mutuals!

(i have no idea where this will go but thats for u guys to decide)

my three most recents songs

Read Your Mind by Sabrina Carpenter

bad idea right? by Olivia Rodrigo

I DONT WANNA BE LIKE YOU by Ruel

and now lets let the mutuals run loose

@itsmegreenman @carawith17as @chharliye @f1s @queeny122

[kailjoi]

prince of gotham

no txt version and close up utc

i had fun making this look cinematic as hell; i hope you enjoy it too

[beautifulbutterfly13]

!!?!?!?!??

[what-is-a-k1lom3t3r]

I finished drawing this today 😝 there's like no rendering whatsoever, but this is also my 2nd time doing a full body picture, and I rlly like drawing my favorite characters! So yeah, here's Wind from linked universe!!

[thedaycareattendant45]

i still love this cosplay

[pointyfruit]

I could not tell you what this is. Snake, bug, flower, fish, thing.

It is my creature though so I love them regardless.

[agropuff]

finally got to sumeru :3

;) under the cut

[thefroggypond]

i know nothing about the mechanisms but every time i see content of it on my feed i go :0!!!

[aveline-amelia]

On Sherlock, asexuality and arguing interpretation

I wanted to speak about this for a while but I was afraid of my words being twisted and being misunderstood. This is not pointed at a particular person. It is not meant to anger or sadden people. To repeat, all headcanons are valid. All ships are valid. This is not meant as a rebuttal of a particular reading of a character's identity or a reading of the show.

I have time and time again seen people say things like "It's so frustrating to see people say Sherlock can't be in love with John because he's asexual. People can be asexual and still in a romantic relationship!" And every time, I wanna say. "Yes, for some people that's true. But they meant aroace. They meant aroace. They clearly meant aroace. (aromantic asexual)"

A lot of people unfamiliar or uneducated with asexuality use "asexual" in place of "aroace". That's how I used it too when I discovered what it was. There was this article about a young woman who felt no sexual or any kind of attraction towards anyone. She was perfectly content with family connection and close friendships. She masturbated but didn't fantasise about anyone while she did and found it strange to find out people even do that.

When a person says they believe Sherlock is asexual and thus cannot be in love with John, this is what they mean most of the time.

They believe he does not participate in relationships or sex and is focused on the Work because he feels no sexual or romantic attraction towards anyone. And most of them feel represented by that because it aligns with their own experiences.

Now, Sherlock could be homoromantic or biromantic or even heteroromantic and asexual. He could be demisexual or gray ace.

But if a gay ace Sherlock and John entered a relationship on the show and they kissed and held hands and were a couple and got married. Guess what?

That would primarily be representative of a same-sex/gay couple. Sherlock is not on HBO. Even if they made Johnlock canon, they would never show them have sex on screen, probably not even implicitly. Sherlock was never going to be about discussion of sexual boundaries and consent. To the majority of the audience, it would have been a gay couple in a sexual (and romantic) relationship.

To quote someone, gay ace is still gay. A gay ace Sherlock would still be a version of asexual Sherlock. But it's not the same thing.

The same way if an ace Sherlock dated Molly and they were a couple, it would be more relatable to heterosexual, bisexual, people attracted to the opposite/different sex people because it aligns with their experiences. That doesn't mean heteroromantic ace people are the same as allo straights. They are not, unless they consider themselves as such.

When people say they want an asexual Sherlock, they mean one that is not dating or having sex with anyone, not John, Molly, Irene, Lestrade nor an original character.

They want to see that identity represented, that you can feel fulfilled in friendships and family relationships. That friendship is not less than, less important, less valuable. That not dating anyone doesn't make you broken.

That not everyone needs a sexual and/or romantic relationship!

That you don't need romantic entanglement to be complete as a human being!

But the inverse is also true.

People will claim it's better Johnlock isn’t canon because Sherlock is ace and that's better and evil Johnlockers are erasing his identity!

Moffat implied asexuality is boring ("...it's someone who abstains that's interesting.... it's a choice of a monk, not a choice of an asexual..") and stories where a character never falls in love is boring. He was going for celibacy, not asexuality. Don't give the writers credit for something at best implied on accident.

Is asexuality a valid and valuable reading? Yes, it is. But it's not canon. The same way Johnlockers saying making asexual Sherlock is erasing gay representation, or that ace Sherlock headcanons make them mad, or calling someone an "asexual fuck" and sending them hate, so is using ace representation as a shield to explain why you don't want more gay representation and that sacred male&male friendships should not be soiled by evil gay sex!

We should be able to have both. We should have more m&m friendships, m&f friendships and more gay, bi and ace representation!

Stop saying "why can't men just be friends?" You do not sound like someone advocating for more male friendship visibility. You just sound like a homophobe. If you see John and Sherlock as strong male friendship or "brothers" (*sigh*). Okay.

If you see them as a same-sex couple, that's great too. Do you. Just let others do the same.

[bird-the-introvert]

my friend made this

(this is our friendship)

[clarks-letterman]

i just want to write a 2008 vibes fanfic with romance you’d see in greys anatomy and gilmore girls and damn even spn in some cases

[leadendeath]

hadron collider / indoor play areas

there's something here...

[chupapizza]

They/them?..

[your-local-ruebit-hole-detective]

I think a lot about the canon interpretation of Jayce abandoning Viktor for Mel, and in the course of trying to write a one shot about the subject, I’ve realized it just kind of… isn’t true?

Like… if you look at the plot beat where Mel, Jayce, and Viktor’s relationship is on full display, the hexcore/sex scene, it’s late at night. Jayce hasn’t abandoned Viktor for Mel, he’s just having a romantic life outside of work. I would question anyone who would say that’s abandonment. And when he hears Viktor is hurt, he actually leaves Mel for Viktor! He leaves her alone without so much as a note, because his friend/brother/lover (depending on your interpretation) needs him.

And then later, when Jayce apologizes to Mel for leaving her, he says sorry… and then immediately segues into talking about Viktor. (Which, yknow, kind of a dick move.) His apology essentially amounts to “sorry, but let’s talk about Viktor now because I’m so worried about him.” Mel doesn’t really get her feelings in the spotlight in that scene, other than a veiled bitter remark, before she’s comforting Jayce.

idk. I think about the three of them a lot.

[sillykiwie]

PHIGHITNG OCS!!!!

ME AND MY AWESOME PHRIENDO MAKE PHIGHTING OCS ON CALL!!

THIS IS MY BABY WING!! HES BASED OFF OF THIS GEAR:

AND HERES MY SILLY PHRIENDS OC!!

SHES BASED OFF OF THIS GEAR!!!

AND I DID A LIL DOODLE OF THEM :3

THANK YOU 4 VIEWING!!!