i realized that out of the Many pokemon n uses across the two games, none of them are friendship evos. like you'd Think that'd be an easy thing to do with him because putting friendship evos on an antagonist's team to show they're actually nice aside from whatever villainy they're doing is an established thing in pokemon, and it would contrast with ghetsis's frustration hydreigon nicely
but really, it makes sense n wouldn't have any because friendship levels take time to build up. n would ask for help once, and then let the pokemon go, believing it was best for them. but as he learned, pokemon like being with humans. he released them so quickly none of his pokemon would ever have gotten the chance to really connect with him.
and isnt that ironic? the man who connects with pokemon on a deeper level than anyone else probably had less close pokemon friends at the time of bw1 than your average trainer. i'd guess it was just his zoroark at the time. do you think any of those pokemon were upset with him after being released so quickly? i'm sure pokemon are aware being captured can be a lifelong commitment, so being caught and released within an hour or two might not exactly sit well. like sure he probably told them what his intentions were but do you think any of them wished this strange new friend had stuck around a little longer?
101 notes
·
View notes
Hey we accidentally deleted your ask, but we were able to screenshot it before it happened.
You might be in the wrong place to be asking this question since it is something we truly don't want to talk about on our confessions blog.
We weren't around during that time, we've never even had access to the pack, so we cannot speak as to why this is as it is. (As far as we have ever seen, we have never seen any of this being true, no screenshots nor evidence that this has occurred.)
Either way, we won't be answering this anon ask. This is outside of our comfort zone and isn't something we want to cover using this blog. Please do not send any more asks about this sort of topic. (As in, covering discourse or drama of things within the community that isn't important anymore.)
8 notes
·
View notes
rambly rant in the aftermath of this whole situation. I wasn’t gonna say anything because I didn’t have anything new or smart to say
but now I really wanna implore my followers to think critically in light of tumblr “drama”. because it’s dangerous. inflammatory posts are so easy.
imagine being called some of the worst words for one second, could you as easily defend yourself? even if you knew you had done nothing, how easy does it seem to convince an angry mob that they’ve got it wrong? definitely not as easy as making the fucking post at least.
I don’t want to talk whatever allegations. its not about the post of the week. its about the culture around drama, and free-for-all that surrounds it.
the lack of critical thought and understanding that smart, grown humans are able to give these situations is sad. past blind gut reaction anger and disbelief, do yall do anything with those thoughts afterward? parroting some talking head without thought isn’t insight. the people who make these posts on anon and think that gives them free reign to do the most despicable shit,
if you wish real harm, if you doxx, if you threaten someone’s life or innocent people who aren’t even involved - you’re straight up a bad person. the person you’re calling out may be a bad person too, but there’s no way you’re the “good guy” there.
can you actually think about what you believe in regards to the thing?
some of you seem to think everyone acts in service of you and your beliefs, instead of their own reasons and beliefs.
I know angry people are gonna start shit bc you have the critical reading skills of a goldfish so again, this isn’t a judgement about the situations that have cropped up in dc spheres last few days. I can’t say anything that hasn’t been said before. It’s about how y’all react to it. Drama isn’t an excuse to become a horrible person for a few days. And if you take any chance to publicly act like a shitty person, maybe you just are a shitty person.
It shows that most of you have no fucking clue of what you’re talking about. Publicly airing your problem w someone isn’t public service.
we all understand that a subjective bad interaction isn’t proof. it doesn’t criminalise someone to be shit person to talk to, but that’s 90% of the rbs.
If you have a gripe with someone, you talk about it in private, or to friends, or block them. And if you’re gonna call someone out, make sure you can line up the facts. Not assumptions.
The vagueness is so distasteful. If you don’t have enough fact to label them with that word publicly, maybe mind your business and dislike the person in quiet. no one said you’re not allowed to dislike someone.
have some fucking class. unless you’ve made sure that what you’re saying in the Whole truth, it probably isn’t. it’s your belief, and your belief isn’t any more important or right than anyone else’s. so many of you are seriously, seriously embarrassing. good job doing absolutely nothing for the betterment of anyone.
6 notes
·
View notes
I think your understand of Claude has been warped by DimiClaude fan fics. Claude doesn't like Rhea in Houses and wants her out of power and says as much at the beginning of Verdant Wind and you even gain support points with him if you ask him if he hopes Rhea is dead versus if he hopes Rhea is alive. Claude doesn't stop wanting Rhea deposed because he spent an extra year in the Academy.
lmfao bruh i have never once read a dimiclaude fic that involved rhea or even mentions rhea/how either of them feel about rhea, how are you gonna tell me my perception of him is warped by something i've never even read? don't go blaming people's enjoyed ships as a scapegoat just because you don't like someone's discussion about a character. that ship and my opinion of hopes claude/his feelings on absolutely anything have nothing to do with each other.
do you do that to everyone? assume you know what they read and what kind of fandom stuff they engage with? assume that people read fanfics and that somehow it makes them forget canon? 'cause it's pretty haughty.
have you read like, any of my posts/asks? i've pretty explicitly discussed that he doesn't like rhea or her in power. that's very different from personally murdering someone. i also never said his year at the academy had anything to do with his feelings toward rhea.
i don't even read that many fanfics so that's quite a bold faulty assumption. not sure what you thought assuming what i read was going to accomplish, and for that matter, i'm not sure what you thought insulting every dmcl writer out there was going to accomplish by implying they all write "warped" versions of him. what the fuck does dimitri have to do with claude's feelings about rhea?
surprise, nothing.
68 notes
·
View notes
Listen.
I know that until now I've only really posted things about The Marauders Era Babes, but I need you all to understand just how much I hold myself back on this website from the Everything Else I'm obsessed with at any given moment.
Which includes but is not limited to:
Critical Role (Specifically Campaign 2)
Skip Beat! (The manga)
BNHA (Erasermic, Shinkami, etc etc)
Pirates. Just in general. I fucking love pirates
The Adventure Zone: Balance
Dnd (as in the game I'm currently playing)
Haikyuu! (TsukkiYama my beloved)
Also, I have so many Spotify playlists for all of my fanfic WIPs and I just really need to share those at some point and give explanations for all the songs. It would be entirely self-indulgent and no one would read it, but it would bring me joy and I think that this is a good enough reason.
5 notes
·
View notes
🩷
Oh as soon as I saw your blog I knew exactly which look to give you! This is Doutzen Kroes at the ICONIC, INCREDIBLE, BEST Dior by John Galliano Haute Couture 2007 show. Literally, every single outfit from this show is a masterpiece, like couture at its FINEST. And the makeup is incredible too. Anyways I’ll stop fangirling now lol. Obviously this look matches the soft pink theme of your blog, plus this look and all the others were inspired by the palace of Versailles and the whole palace/royalty theme really matches your blog too so it’s perfect!
1 note
·
View note
pretty sure the black triangle was used on the flag because most lesbians imprisoned in concentration camps during the holocaust were marked using the black triangle, not the pink triangle, because homosexual women were considered "asocial" and not classified under homosexuals, due to the way that nazis viewed the role of women in society (for the same reasons that they destroyed lesbian life and culture established during weimar republic, but did not outlaw lesbian sex the way they did sex between men). sources for this include "triangles and tribulations: the politics of nazi symbols", as published in the journal of homosexuality.
to be clear, this is not me saying we should or should not use the labrys lesbian flag; i agree that it feels very strange and inappropriate to reclaim a symbol that was primarily directed at roma and sinti! (though, actually, roma and sinti people were later classified with the brown triangle, and their black triangles were specifically marked with a Z notation, to signify them using a german slur that is equivalent to the english g slur). i simply feel it is important to understand why the black triangle was chosen.
the tone of this ask is /nm.
i agree with what you're saying completely, and i know that as a white person i don't really have nuanced expertise on this discussion. there were definitely instances where some lesbians were marked with the Black Triangle, but it's just.... as a symbol it's much more associated with white supremacy than explicit queerphobia, so for a flag with that symbol to be primarily used by TERFs, an extremely white group with very well-established connections to right-wing ideology and especially antisemitism and racism, is just very suspicious to me. i'm not trying to give some firm opinion on whether or not to ever use the symbol, i just think it's very dangerous for people to use a flag that they either don't know the meaning behind, or to blatantly use a white supremacist symbol and not care, because it can just spread blatant Nazi symbolism, which just further can lead to Jewish lesbians, Romani lesbians, and in general lesbians of color, to not knowing whether or not they're safe around that person- because it's hard to know whether they're using it because they're ignorant of its meaning, or if they DO know and don't care.
additionally, while records are very scant, it's generally agreed that the limited "acceptance" lesbians faced during the Nazi regime, was pretty much reserved to non-Jewish lesbians. As seen in the persecution of Magnus Hirschfield, the Nazis viewed homosexuality as something that Jewish people had introduced to whites, they viewed it as Jewish peoples' fault. Jewish lesbians did not have the same luxuries that Gentile lesbians did, so it's still first and foremost a white supremacist symbol.
8 notes
·
View notes
just 4 clarification when u say exclus dni does that mean ppl who tell nby/gnc trans ppl 2 kts or people who are against trans men/bi 'lesbians'
if you’re going to try and argue with me about who should or should not be included in the lgbt community i will block you. that’s what that means. it’s not a dni, it’s a block list.
5 notes
·
View notes