rightnewshindi · 11 days ago
Text
क्रिप्टो करेंसी फ्रॉड मामले में 73 आरोपियों के खिलाफ चार्जशीट दायर, अब तक 35 करोड़ की संपत्ति जब्त
Crypto Currency Fraud Himachal: हिमाचल पुलिस की एसआईटी ने क्रिप्टो करंसी ठगी मामले में अब तक 73 आरोपियों के चार्जशीट दायर की है। एसआईटी ने अब तक क्रिप्टो रैकेट के आरोपियों की 35 करोड़ की संपत्ति भी फ्रीज की है। करोड़ों की ठगी मामले की जांच एसआईटी ने अब एसपी कांगड़ा को सौंप दी है। इससे पहले आईजी उत्तरी रेंज अभिषेक दुल्लर की अध्यक्षता में गठित की गई एसआईटी मामले की जांच कर रही थी। अब इस मामले की…
0 notes
todayworldnews2k21 · 25 days ago
Text
RG Kar hospital rape-murder: CBI rules out gangrape, says Sanjay Roy sole accused in its chargesheet | Kolkata News - Times of India
NEW DELHI: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed its first chargesheet in the RG Kar Hospital case, accusing Sanjay Roy of the rape and murder of a postgraduate trainee doctor. The chargesheet, presented in a Sialdah court in West Bengal, identifies Sanjay Roy as the sole accused, ruling out the possibility of gang rape.The CBI has interrogated nearly 100 witnesses and conducted 12…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
infocrazebyrepwoop · 4 months ago
Text
ACC Approves Chargesheet Against Bengal Group Chairman for Illegal Wealth
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) approved a chargesheet on Thursday against Bengal Group Chairman Abul Khair Litu, accusing him of amassing wealth worth Tk90 crore beyond his known sources of income. ACC Deputy Director Aktarul Islam confirmed this to Dhaka Tribune. The chargesheet alleges that Abul Khair Litu illegally accumulated wealth and concealed information about it. The ACC Deputy…
0 notes
playermagic23 · 9 months ago
Text
CBI files chargesheet against YouTuber over allegedly forged letters in Sridevi death case
The Central Bureau of Investigation has taken legal action against a self-styled investigator, Deepti R Pinniti, accusing her of presenting "forged" letters from high di.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has taken decisive action in the Sridevi death case. The agency has filed a charge sheet against a self-proclaimed investigator who purportedly presented "forged" letters from prominent dignitaries, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, to support her claims. Officials disclosed this development on Sunday, shedding light on the agency's ongoing efforts to address the matter.
Tumblr media
Last year, the CBI initiated a case against Deepti R Pinniti, hailing from Bhubaneswar, and her lawyer Bharath Suresh Kamath, following a complaint lodged by Mumbai-based lawyer Chandni Shah. The complaint, forwarded to the agency by the Prime Minister's Office, alleged that Pinniti had disseminated fabricated documents, including letters attributed to the Prime Minister and the Defence Minister, as well as materials purportedly sourced from the Supreme Court and the UAE government.
Pinniti, known for her active engagement in social media dialogues surrounding the deaths of Bollywood icons like Sridevi and Sushant Singh Rajput, made startling assertions regarding Sridevi's demise, including insinuations of government involvement. In one interview, she suggested a "cover-up between the two governments," drawing attention to her self-proclaimed "investigations."
Responding to inquiries from PTI, Pinniti expressed incredulity at the CBI's actions, remarking, "It's kind of hard to believe that the CBI has filed a charge sheet against me without recording my statement." She further contested the validity of the evidence, indicating a potential conflict of interest due to the CBI's affiliations. "When the letters in question are incriminating against the very authorities under whom the CBI comes, CBI becomes a party of conflict to be the entity to collect evidence," she asserted.
The CBI had previously conducted searches at Pinniti's residence in Bhubaneswar on December 2, seizing digital devices such as phones and laptops. Subsequent investigations revealed that the documents presented by Pinniti during her YouTube discussions, specifically those concerning the Prime Minister and the Defence Minister, were allegedly forged. Consequently, the agency has pressed charges against both Pinniti and Kamath under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 120-B (criminal conspiracy), 465, 469, and 471.
In her complaint, Mumbai-based lawyer Shah had accused Pinniti of tarnishing the reputation of the government by baselessly implicating it in Sridevi's death.
0 notes
seemabhatnagar · 1 year ago
Text
Hijaab Row
India is known in the world as a Secular Country but see day by day the Secular fabric is tearing off. You belong to a particular faith so you are free to profess your religion, practices and faith but you can't compel people belonging to other faith to profess your religious practices. This is what done in the present case which recently came before Hon'ble Jabalpur High Court where in the Ganga Jamuna Higher Secondary School Urdu is being taught as compulsory subject and students are compelled to recite prayers belonging to muslim faith in school.
On the other hand students belonging to Hindu or Jain Sect are restrained to wear Kalawa or to put Tilak on their forehead but are forced to wear Hijaab and salwar kurti.
Background
This is a case of #HijabRow where  #Non-Muslim students studying in Ganga Jamuna Higher Secondary School, Futera Ward, Damoh, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh were #forced to wear salwar kurti, head scarf (#Hijaab) and dupatta (#scarf) right from Nursery to Class XII and forcefully #restrained from putting #tilak on the forehead or# tying sacred thread (#kalawa) on their wrist and if #someone #wears the sacred thread (kalawa) or put tilak, she is being #forcibly #prevented, by the teachers.
Fact
A #complaint in this regard was received. Matter was inquired & Investigation was conducted & head Scarves were seized. Statement of the girl students were recorded and #FIR was #KotwaliDamoh of Damoh District for the offences punishable under Sections 295A, 506 and 120B of the IPC, Section 75 and 87 of Juvenile Justice Act (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and Section 3/5(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act, 2021.
FIR was registered against the #Principal Asfa Sheikh, #teacher Anas Athar and Peon Rustom Ali and management of the school for commission of the aforesaid offences. They were #arrested and are in detention since 11.06.2023.
Submission of the Counsel of the Applicant
1.     It was contended by the Counsel of the detenues that they are innocent and are falsely implicated.
2.     The counsel also submitted a copy of the resolution accordingly it is the #SchoolManagement and #Director of the #School Mohd, Idris who had #prescribed #dresscode for all girl students and made it compulsory to wear scarf.
3.     The detenues were #acting as per the #instructions of the #SchoolManagement. The counsel prayed for the release as in the matter after investigation, charge sheet was submitted.
Submission of the Counsel of the State
1.     The counsel of the #State #opposed the #bail application as the statements of the girl students demonstrated that they were compelled to wear head scarf (Hijaab).
2.     whereas minority institutions cannot compel the students belonging to other religion to wear head scarf (Hijaab)
3.     and it also cannot prevent students of other religion from wearing sacred thread (kalawa) and putting tilak on the forehead.
4.     It also cannot compel them to read Urdu language necessarily and to recite the prayers belonging to Islam faith.
Observation of the Court
1.     Charge sheet has been filed against the applicants who are principal, teachers and peon.
2.     The main allegations are against management of the school.
3.     Trial of the case will take considerable time.
4.     Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, but having taken into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that it is a case in which applicants may be released on bail.
Order
Bail application is allowed subject to the conditions:
1.     Applicants shall not repeat commission of offence.
2.     They shall not prevent students of other religion from wearing the essentials of their own religion.
3.     They shall not compel the students of other religion to read/study any material or language which has not been prescribed or approved by the Madhya Pradesh Education Board.
4.     They shall not provide any religious education or material belonging to Islam faith to the students of other religion and shall impart only modern education as contained in Section 53(1)(iii) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
5.     Girl students of other religion i.e. Hindu and Jain etc. shall not be compelled to wear head scarf anywhere in the school premises or in the class rooms.
6.     Further applicants - Asfa Sheikh, Anas Athar and Rustom Ali be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond incorporating the aforesaid conditions, in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with one solvent surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for their regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that they shall appear before the concerned Court on all the dates fixed by it during trial.
7.     The order is effective till the end of the trial and in case of breach of any of the conditions the order shall become ineffective.
Seema Bhatnagar
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
mishrasatty7 · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
#protestpetition #challan #sippysidhu #chargesheet #maintainability #news #topcriminallawyers #legalseva https://www.instagram.com/p/CoUqjCwvrid/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
0 notes
publictaknews · 2 years ago
Text
NIA chargesheet on ISIS 'fundraiser': Accused was a Delhi student, money was sent through cryptocurrency channels Latest News Delhi
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has filed a charge sheet against Mohammad Mohsin Ahmed, a second-year electrical engineering student at Jamia Millia Islamia University, for allegedly raising funds for the banned global terrorist organization Islamic State (ISIS). Vikas said. Ahmed, 22, a resident of Patna, was arrested by an NIA team in August 2022 from Delhi’s Batla House area after…
View On WordPress
0 notes
leadindia011 · 1 year ago
Text
Can Police Remove Name From Chargesheet?
No, the police cannot remove the name of a person from a charge sheet once it has been filed before a court of law. It can only be modified or withdrawn by the court upon a valid legal request or order.
0 notes
famouslook1987 · 2 years ago
Text
कंझावला केस में दिल्ली पुलिस 1 अप्रैल को दाखिल कर सकती है चार्जशीट, जानें- अब तक का पूरा मामला
Anjali Singh Case: दिल्ली (Delhi) के कंझावला हिट एंड ड्रैग मामले (Kanjhawala Hit And Drag Case) में ��ुलिस अपना पहला चार्जशीट दाखिल करने के लिए तैयार है. इस केस में 20 साल की युवती अंजलि सिंह की 1 जनवरी को तड़के 12 किमी तक कार से घसीटे जाने के बाद दर्दनाक मौत हो गई थी. चार्जशीट 1 अप्रैल को मेट्रोपोलिटन मजिस्ट्रेट कोर्ट में दाखिल किए जाने की संभावना है. मामले की जानकारी रखने वाले एक सूत्र ने कहा कि…
View On WordPress
0 notes
rightnewshindi · 19 days ago
Text
20 अरब रुपए के क्रिप्टो करेंसी घोटाले में आरोपी मिलन गर्ग के खिलाफ अतिरिक्त चार्जशीट दायर, अब तक 89 गिरफ्तार
20 अरब रुपए के क्रिप्टो करेंसी घोटाले में आरोपी मिलन गर्ग के खिलाफ अतिरिक्त चार्जशीट दायर, अब तक 89 गिरफ्तार #Crypto #Currency #Scam #Himachal
Himachal News: दो हजार करोड़ रुपये के क्रिप्टोकरेंसी ठगी मामले में अब पुलिस एसआईटी ने आरोपी गर्ग के खिलाफ अतिरिक्त चार्जशीट दायर कर कोर्ट में पेश कर दी है। इस घोटाले में अभी तक 20 मामले दर्ज हुए हैं। पुलिस ने इस मामले में अभी तक 89 आरोपियों की गिरफ्तारी की है। दो हजार करोड़ रुपये के क्रिप्टोकरेंसी ठगी मामले के मुख्य आरोपी सुभाष का ऑनलाइन कामकाज बीते दिनों कोलकाता से गिरफ्तार मिलन गर्ग संभालता…
1 note · View note
kupwaratimes-fan · 2 years ago
Text
Enroachment Case: CBK Files Chargesheet Against 6 Persons for Forging Revenue Documents
Enroachment Case: CBK Files Chargesheet Against 6 Persons for Forging Revenue Documents
Enroachment Case: CBK Files Chargesheet Against 6 Persons for Forging Revenue Documents Srinagar, December 15: Crime Branch Kashmir on Thursday said that it’s Economic Offence Wing filed chargehseet against 6 persons in connection with producing fake revenue Documents. In a handout to GNS, the CBK said that its Economic Offence Wing Produced a Charge-Sheet in Case FIR No. 04/2015 U/S 420, 467,…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
bollywoodirect · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
"Main Zindagi Ka Saath Nibhaata Chala Gaya
Har Fikar Ko Dhuyein Mein Udata Chala Gaya"
Remembering Bollywood's evergreen star, the inimitable Dev Anand, on his 100th birth anniversary (26/09/1923).
Dev Anand, born as Dharamdev Pishorimal Anand on 26 September 1923, was a celebrated figure in the Indian film industry. His extensive contributions as an actor, writer, director, and producer in Hindi cinema marked him as one of the most successful and respected actors in Indian film history. Over a career spanning six decades, Anand worked in over 100 films, earning numerous awards including four Filmfare Awards and the prestigious Padma Bhushan and Dadasaheb Phalke Award from the Government of India.
Anand's film journey began in 1946 with a lead role in "Hum Ek Hain," a film promoting Hindu-Muslim unity. His first hit, "Ziddi," came in 1948, followed by the superhit "Baazi" in 1951, which pioneered the influx of "Bombay Noir" films in the 1950s. His later years were marked by numerous successful films, earning him a romantic image and solidifying his place in the industry.
The 1965 film "Guide" was a significant milestone in Anand's career. Based on R. K. Narayan's novel, it was a huge success and was nominated for Best Foreign Language Film at the 38th Academy Awards. Anand continued to star in various box office hits throughout the 70s and 80s, with "Chargesheet" in 2011 being his final film.
Anand's distinctive acting style, characterized by his fast dialogue delivery and unique nodding, became his trademark. His films often explored cultural and socially relevant topics, reflecting his worldview. Married to actress Kalpana Kartik, Anand had two children, including Suneil Anand.
Anand's charm, diverse roles, and good looks made him one of the highest-paid actors from the 1950s to the early 1970s. In 2022, he was honored in Outlook India's "75 Best Bollywood Actors" list. Known as the "first fashion icon" of Bollywood, Anand's fashion statements and style were emulated by many.
Anand's autobiography, "Romancing with Life," was released in September 2007, and his 1961 film "Hum Dono" was digitized, colorized, and re-released in February 2011. His enduring appeal and unmatched style led to numerous accolades and recognition, with many noting his flamboyant, debonair, and romantic screen presence. Despite comparisons to Hollywood actor Gregory Peck, Anand maintained his unique identity, stating, "I am Dev Anand."
Anand's meetings with Peck, initiated at Bombay's Willingdon Club in 1954, were marked by mutual respect and admiration. Despite their interactions, Anand remained a distinct and beloved figure in Indian cinema, celebrated for his timeless contributions and enduring legacy.
2 notes · View notes
beerbhadrasingh · 1 year ago
Link
4 notes · View notes
seemabhatnagar · 1 year ago
Text
Casual behavior of a doctor may lead to fatal consequences
 Dr. Biswa Mohan Misra v. State of Orissa
Crl MC No.1002/2017 Before High Court of Orissa at Cuttack
Petition U/s 482 Cr PC was dismissed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice G Satapathy J
On 14.08.2023
Facts
Madhusmita Sahoo, the deceased was admitted on 01.07.09 at 6 PM in medicine Ward of Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation Hospital at Old Town Bhubneshwar where she was under the treatment of the Dr. Biswa Mohan Misra. The deceased was having low haemoglobin and her condition was getting worse her uncle requested the petitioner and staff of BMC Hospital to give her blood transfusion immediately for her treatment. Petitioner’s Uncle was informed that blood will be given on 02.07.2009. At about 11 PM her condition deteriorated, Dr. Sujata was on night duty in the hospital also called the petitioner - Doctor several times but petitioner Doctor didn’t responded instead suggested to contact B N Das Mohapatra, Surgery Specialist to attend the patient. Dr. Mohapatra on receiving the request assured the uncle of the deceased that he will direct the petitioner to attend the patient immediately but the patient died in all this process.
To manage the situation the Dr. Sujata shifted the patient with Oxygen support to another hospital where it was declared that she is brought dead.
On 02.07.2009 Uncle of the deceased lodged FIR IPC U/s 304A IPC after investigation charge sheet was submitted against the petitioner.
Submission of the Counsel of the Petitioner - Doctor
No material exists against the petitioner to make a case of Section 304A IPC against him.
Petitioner had suggested for ultrasound of the whole abdomen and pelvis for proper diagnosis but the family members failed to conduct the USG as such family members of the patient were negligent not the petitioner.
Moreover, petitioner discharged his duty by advising family members to take patient to another hospital where USG facility was available.
Submission of the State through Additional Government Advocate
Charge sheet shows that despite repeated telephone calls and requests made by Dr. Sujata Samanta, the petitioner refused to come to attend the patient, rather he suggested to shift the patient to a private Nursing Home.
The kind of response by the petitioner-doctor is a clear-cut violation of public duty and constitute gross negligence and the above fact stands justified by the Call Details Report of mobile phone number of the petitioner and landline phone number of the BMC Hospital.
The petitioner had not performed his duty and is squarely liable for gross negligence and the present proceeding therefore, should not be quashed.
Test for qualifying liability for offence U/s of 304A IPC : (1) There must be death of the person in question (2) The accused must have cause such death (3) Act of the accused is rash and negligent and it did not amount to culpable homicide amounting to murder.
A casual reference to the material in hand discloses that petitioner was negligent therefore he was charge sheeted u/s 304A IPC. 304A IPC prescribes punishment for negligence thereby causing death by negligence.
Criminal negligence, is gross and culpable, neglect or failure to exercise, reasonable and proper care and precaution to guard against injury, either to the pubic generally or to an individual in particular.
In criminal case, the magnitude and degree of negligence* are determinative factors. Besides, there must be mensrea in criminal negligence, which shall be of such nature to the utter disregard to the life and safety of others so as to amount a crime.
*Essential Components of negligence are three: “duty”, “breach” and “resulting damage”.
Observation of the Court
From the documents before the Court it  appears that some adverse and negative opinion by the medical board is given with respect to the treatment of the deceased in the charge-sheet.
The report of Dr. Sujata Samanta who was on duty on the relevant night states “despite my repeated telephone request between 10.45 PM to 12.25 AM on 01/02.07.2009 to take proper action, the Petitioner refused to come to attend the patient, rather replied over telephone only to shift the patient (deceased) to any private nursing home.
The CDR of Mobile of Petitioner and land Phone of BMC Hospital establishes that at 12.30 AM in the mid night of 01/02.07.2009 the location of the mobile of the Petitioner was at Sahidnagar, but he was found to have referred the patient to surgery specialist mentioning the time 12.30AM on 02.07.2009 in the bed head ticket.
The deceased died on account of gross negligence of the Petitioner is a question of fact which can be answered in the trial and after evidence is led, but the materials so collected by the Investigating Agency reveals that there appears some prima facie case against the Petitioner requiring a trial in this case.
The Petitioner failed to show that the criminal proceeding against him is an abuse of process of Court and, thereby, is required to be quashed.
Decision
The Petition u/s 482 Cr P C stands dismissed on contest.
Seema Bhatnagar
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
hindustanmorning · 15 days ago
Text
CBI filing chargesheet in RG Kar corruption case, while ED questioning Sandeep Ghosh's statement
CBI will submit chargesheet for corruption case at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata. In this instance, CBI has detained ex-principal Sandeep Ghosh and Ashish Pandey. In this instance, ED took doctor Sandeep Ghosh’s statement in Kolkata prison. ED went to prison and took Sandeep Ghosh’s statement four times. The ED has taken Dr. Sandeep Ghosh’s statement in jail on 8, 9, 14, and 15…
0 notes
news365timesindia · 17 days ago
Text
[ad_1] GG News Bureau Mumbai, 14th Oct. The arrest and incarceration of gangster Lawrence Bishnoi have not quelled the dangers posed by his sprawling criminal network, which stretches across multiple states and maintains strong links to terror groups. Despite being behind bars for nearly a decade, Bishnoi’s influence over the gangster-terror nexus remains substantial. His alleged role in the recent murder of Baba Siddique, a former Maharashtra minister and NCP leader, highlights the alarming persistence of his operations. This incident is only the latest in a series of crimes where the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has connected Bishnoi’s network to terror activities and smuggling operations. Bishnoi’s connection to banned terror outfit Babbar Khalsa International (BKI) has long been a point of concern for law enforcement agencies. The NIA’s ongoing investigations reveal a disturbing trend: a coordinated effort between Bishnoi’s syndicate and pro-Khalistan elements to destabilize the region. Notably, Bishnoi’s alliance with Goldy Brar, a Canada-based gangster with ties to BKI, has allowed him to extend his reach beyond India’s borders. The duo’s alleged involvement in extortion and violence, such as the RPG attack on Punjab’s State Intelligence headquarters in Mohali, has exposed the dangerous nexus between organized crime and terrorism. The NIA’s efforts to clamp down on Bishnoi’s syndicate have been substantial, involving the filing of chargesheets, the attachment of properties in multiple states, and the arrest of key associates. However, the persistence of Bishnoi’s criminal enterprise, even from within the confines of jail, underscores the complexities of dismantling such networks. His ability to coordinate operations with incarcerated gang members and manage seamless communication channels speaks to a systemic problem in how gangsters exploit prison facilities to maintain their control over criminal activities. A particularly concerning aspect of this network is its relentless recruitment drive. Bishnoi’s gang continues to prey on impressionable youth across Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Maharashtra, Delhi, Rajasthan, and Jharkhand. This recruitment not only fuels their extortion rackets but also strengthens the nexus with terror outfits, making it harder to isolate and neutralize such threats. The youth drawn into these networks often become pawns, trained to carry out violent activities under the directives of gang leaders like Bishnoi and their terror associates. The case of Bishnoi also reveals deeper challenges within India’s fight against organized crime and terror networks. The involvement of cross-border elements, such as the smuggling of arms, ammunition, and drugs from Pakistan, adds another layer of complexity to the NIA’s task. For every move made to weaken Bishnoi’s grip, his syndicate adapts, seeking new ways to maintain their operations and assert their influence over local communities. This issue is not merely about law enforcement; it is about the systemic threats to regional stability and security. It calls for a multi-pronged approach, including community outreach programs to prevent youth recruitment, better monitoring of communication within prisons, and enhanced intelligence-sharing between states. The NIA’s work is crucial, but without coordinated efforts across law enforcement agencies and a focus on dismantling the support systems that allow syndicates like Bishnoi’s to thrive, the challenge remains significant. The death of Baba Siddique is a tragic reminder of how deeply entrenched such networks are, capable of orchestrating violence even from within prison walls. The path forward lies in a relentless pursuit of justice, closing the loopholes that enable these syndicates, and ensuring that the long arm of the law reaches every corner of the criminal-terror nexus. Only then can we hope to curtail the influence of figures like Lawrence Bishnoi and secure a safer future for the region. [ad_2]
0 notes