#Data Organization

[deep-definition]

Directories: Meaning, Definition, and Usage Across Languages

Learn everything about directories, including their meanings, definitions, usage, and examples in various languages. Explore FAQs and detailed information about directories in computing, business, and more. Directories Pronunciation: Directory (/dəˈrɛktəri/ or /daɪˈrɛktəri/) Definitions:Meaning:Synonyms:Antonyms:History and Origin (Etymology):Grammar Rules:Rhymes:Recent Examples on the…

[digitalgoodsf]

✨ Streamline Your Research – Stay Organized & Focused! ✨

Say goodbye to messy notes, boost your research efficiency and upgrade your literature review process! 📝🔍

Grab yours now!

[ghostofnuggetspast]

All hail the Archive

[josephkravis]

My First Database Or Two

Before digital databases, there were manual, physical systems for data organization.

Oki dokie. Yes, this topic might seem a bit outdated, but it’s essential to revisit as we advance toward AI technologies capable of correlating vast amounts of data. As we move into this era, starting at the basics of organizing information with lists seems fitting. So, let’s go back to My First Database! Creating and Using Lists Lists are a foundational tool for organizing and prioritizing…

[aretovetechnologies01]

The first step is to detect the problems that are present in your process. For most organizations, complex and slow data organization results in issues that can be easily identified. This includes various applications that comprise multiple statistical information for the same entities. Another problem may be poor data that can negatively affect analytics reports or lead to inferior mapping.

[gpstudios]

Organizing Data in Excel and Life: The Key to Clarity and Efficiency

In Excel, data needs to be organized to make sense, just as in life, where organizing your tasks and priorities is crucial. Learn how to enhance your productivity and clarity through effective organization.

Introduction In Excel, data needs to be organized to make sense, just as in life, where organizing your tasks and priorities is crucial. Whether you’re managing a complex dataset or juggling daily responsibilities, effective organization is the foundation of clarity, productivity, and success. This blog post explores the parallels between organizing data in Excel and managing your life,…

[peachesanmemes]

Just once, I want someone I know to let me autism dump about the spreadsheets I've maintained since 2018/2019 on a monthly basis, and for them to be interested and fascinated and ask questions...

rb if you are also emotionally tied to your little graphs ;_;

[newpartnerincrime]

appreciation post for san’s big heart 🍒

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Shifting $677m from the banks to the people, every year, forever

I'll be in TUCSON, AZ from November 8-10: I'm the GUEST OF HONOR at the TUSCON SCIENCE FICTION CONVENTION.

"Switching costs" are one of the great underappreciated evils in our world: the more it costs you to change from one product or service to another, the worse the vendor, provider, or service you're using today can treat you without risking your business.

Businesses set out to keep switching costs as high as possible. Literally. Mark Zuckerberg's capos send him memos chortling about how Facebook's new photos feature will punish anyone who leaves for a rival service with the loss of all their family photos – meaning Zuck can torment those users for profit and they'll still stick around so long as the abuse is less bad than the loss of all their cherished memories:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/facebooks-secret-war-switching-costs

It's often hard to quantify switching costs. We can tell when they're high, say, if your landlord ties your internet service to your lease (splitting the profits with a shitty ISP that overcharges and underdelivers), the switching cost of getting a new internet provider is the cost of moving house. We can tell when they're low, too: you can switch from one podcatcher program to another just by exporting your list of subscriptions from the old one and importing it into the new one:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/10/16/keep-it-really-simple-stupid/#read-receipts-are-you-kidding-me-seriously-fuck-that-noise

But sometimes, economists can get a rough idea of the dollar value of high switching costs. For example, a group of economists working for the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau calculated that the hassle of changing banks is costing Americans at least $677m per year (see page 526):

https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_personal-financial-data-rights-final-rule_2024-10.pdf

The CFPB economists used a very conservative methodology, so the number is likely higher, but let's stick with that figure for now. The switching costs of changing banks – determining which bank has the best deal for you, then transfering over your account histories, cards, payees, and automated bill payments – are costing everyday Americans more than half a billion dollars, every year.

Now, the CFPB wasn't gathering this data just to make you mad. They wanted to do something about all this money – to find a way to lower switching costs, and, in so doing, transfer all that money from bank shareholders and executives to the American public.

And that's just what they did. A newly finalized Personal Financial Data Rights rule will allow you to authorize third parties – other banks, comparison shopping sites, brokers, anyone who offers you a better deal, or help you find one – to request your account data from your bank. Your bank will be required to provide that data.

I loved this rule when they first proposed it:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/10/getting-things-done/#deliverism

And I like the final rule even better. They've really nailed this one, even down to the fine-grained details where interop wonks like me get very deep into the weeds. For example, a thorny problem with interop rules like this one is "who gets to decide how the interoperability works?" Where will the data-formats come from? How will we know they're fit for purpose?

This is a super-hard problem. If we put the monopolies whose power we're trying to undermine in charge of this, they can easily cheat by delivering data in uselessly obfuscated formats. For example, when I used California's privacy law to force Mailchimp to provide list of all the mailing lists I've been signed up for without my permission, they sent me thousands of folders containing more than 5,900 spreadsheets listing their internal serial numbers for the lists I'm on, with no way to find out what these lists are called or how to get off of them:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/07/22/degoogled/#kafka-as-a-service

So if we're not going to let the companies decide on data formats, who should be in charge of this? One possibility is to require the use of a standard, but again, which standard? We can ask a standards body to make a new standard, which they're often very good at, but not when the stakes are high like this. Standards bodies are very weak institutions that large companies are very good at capturing:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/30/weak-institutions/

Here's how the CFPB solved this: they listed out the characteristics of a good standards body, listed out the data types that the standard would have to encompass, and then told banks that so long as they used a standard from a good standards body that covered all the data-types, they'd be in the clear.

Once the rule is in effect, you'll be able to go to a comparison shopping site and authorize it to go to your bank for your transaction history, and then tell you which bank – out of all the banks in America – will pay you the most for your deposits and charge you the least for your debts. Then, after you open a new account, you can authorize the new bank to go back to your old bank and get all your data: payees, scheduled payments, payment history, all of it. Switching banks will be as easy as switching mobile phone carriers – just a few clicks and a few minutes' work to get your old number working on a phone with a new provider.

This will save Americans at least $677 million, every year. Which is to say, it will cost the banks at least $670 million every year.

Naturally, America's largest banks are suing to block the rule:

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/cfpbs-open-banking-rule-faces-suit-from-bank-policy-institute

Of course, the banks claim that they're only suing to protect you, and the $677m annual transfer from their investors to the public has nothing to do with it. The banks claim to be worried about bank-fraud, which is a real thing that we should be worried about. They say that an interoperability rule could make it easier for scammers to get at your data and even transfer your account to a sleazy fly-by-night operation without your consent. This is also true!

It is obviously true that a bad interop rule would be bad. But it doesn't follow that every interop rule is bad, or that it's impossible to make a good one. The CFPB has made a very good one.

For starters, you can't just authorize anyone to get your data. Eligible third parties have to meet stringent criteria and vetting. These third parties are only allowed to ask for the narrowest slice of your data needed to perform the task you've set for them. They aren't allowed to use that data for anything else, and as soon as they've finished, they must delete your data. You can also revoke their access to your data at any time, for any reason, with one click – none of this "call a customer service rep and wait on hold" nonsense.

What's more, if your bank has any doubts about a request for your data, they are empowered to (temporarily) refuse to provide it, until they confirm with you that everything is on the up-and-up.

I wrote about the lawsuit this week for @eff@mastodon.social's Deeplinks blog:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/10/no-matter-what-bank-says-its-your-money-your-data-and-your-choice

In that article, I point out the tedious, obvious ruses of securitywashing and privacywashing, where a company insists that its most abusive, exploitative, invasive conduct can't be challenged because that would expose their customers to security and privacy risks. This is such bullshit.

It's bullshit when printer companies say they can't let you use third party ink – for your own good:

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/01/hp-ceo-blocking-third-party-ink-from-printers-fights-viruses/

It's bullshit when car companies say they can't let you use third party mechanics – for your own good:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/09/03/rip-david-graeber/#rolling-surveillance-platforms

It's bullshit when Apple says they can't let you use third party app stores – for your own good:

https://www.eff.org/document/letter-bruce-schneier-senate-judiciary-regarding-app-store-security

It's bullshit when Facebook says you can't independently monitor the paid disinformation in your feed – for your own good:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/05/comprehensive-sex-ed/#quis-custodiet-ipsos-zuck

And it's bullshit when the banks say you can't change to a bank that charges you less, and pays you more – for your own good.

CFPB boss Rohit Chopra is part of a cohort of Biden enforcers who've hit upon a devastatingly effective tactic for fighting corporate power: they read the law and found out what they're allowed to do, and then did it:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/23/getting-stuff-done/#praxis

The CFPB was created in 2010 with the passage of the Consumer Financial Protection Act, which specifically empowers the CFPB to make this kind of data-sharing rule. Back when the CFPA was in Congress, the banks howled about this rule, whining that they were being forced to share their data with their competitors.

But your account data isn't your bank's data. It's your data. And the CFPB is gonna let you have it, and they're gonna save you and your fellow Americans at least $677m/year – forever.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/11/01/bankshot/#personal-financial-data-rights

[minidisaster93]

I love almost every single poppy playtime character, Doey is definitely top three.

I subsequently am also terrified by most of the characters and once again Doey is in the top three

[mostly-natm]

Lore keeps a baby (out of spite).

[digitalgoodsf]

🔍 Streamline Your Research Process with Ease

Conducting a literature review can be overwhelming, but Cognisight helps you stay organized, track sources, and analyze key findings efficiently. Whether you're a student, researcher, or academic, this planner provides a structured approach to managing your research.

📌 Key Features: ✔ Research Blueprint – Define your research focus, objectives, keywords, and search strategies. ✔ Literature Tracker – Organize sources with key details, categorization, and evaluation metrics. ✔ Analysis Tab – Identify themes, compare studies, assess biases, and uncover research gaps. ✔ Summary Dashboard – Gain insights into keywords, themes, literature assessment, and research progress with visual charts. ✔ Customizable Settings – Adjust citation styles, relevance levels, and quality criteria to fit your research needs.

The Ultimate Research Planner – Stay Ahead in Your Studies! 🎓📊

Grab yours now!

[sophiebaek]

Benophie Calendar - 2024

Benophie Season (s4) documentation so far!

Some dates may not be exact but dug around the best I could! Will be adding as production and press go along.

Special thanks to @vengerb3rg for brainstorming and fact checking xx

[friendofcars]

my manuscript got accepted 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻🕺🏻🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊

[isa-moon-man]

[ovaruling]

on the subject of individual actions, they do matter, which is why men flip out when the measured birth rate stagnates/doesn’t increase or drops. they worry and they get upset and they cry and they scream and they publish articles about how men are in a crisis and it’s all our fault because we are making selfish individual choices that don’t benefit their collective. it adds up. you may not think your individual impact is much, but men as a group, especially men in high places, usually pay a whole lot more attention to the individual choices of women than you might think. and they react. that’s all i’m saying