I was craving a sugary HorrorDust, 🥺🥺
It turns out that Black (Coffee) & Blue (Berry Syrup), by ohjustdisarmalready , has the perfect formula!!
It is, at the same time, a love letter to Kasbaka's Checks & Balances, because that's how I imagine the relationship of these lovebirds
😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️❤️
Dust belongs to Ask-DustTale
Horror belongs to Sour-Apple-Studios
Inspired in Ao3 fics :
(⚠️+18) Black (Coffee) & Blue (Berry Syrup), by ohjustdisarmalready
(⚠️+18) Checks & Balances, by Kasbaka
750 notes
·
View notes
love how Solar Opposites started out as a sitcom about two aliens who can't stand each other, stuck with their teenage clones (whom they also can't stand) & a toddler antichrist (whom they view as a sort of self-sufficient free-roaming hamster?) on a stupid planet they can't stand
and 4 seasons later it's a sitcom about a family of genderqueer aliens, headed by a gay couple in a happy & horny open marriage (with a graphic off-screen sex life, despite their canonical lack of genitalia?) teaching themselves to be okay parents to their 3 kids (whose Sci-Fi Antics now slightly-less-frequently revolve around wreaking havoc on human bystanders, and slightly-more-frequently revolve around alien-clone-sibling-bonding*), to the point that the central plot point becomes "We need to provide our toddler antichrist with a stable home environment."
(also the grumpy alien husband is too busy ingratiating his family with their suburban neighbors to even remember whom or what he dislikes. what is this show)
2K notes
·
View notes
something about childhood in succession.. the way it casts its shadow over the entire narrative, the rotten root of the roy siblings’s pain, all wrapped up in Logan’s power and abuse and love. The opening credits are filled with images of them as kids, beginning every. single. episode. by emphasizing the importance of their childhood: the siblings posing for a photo, playing sports, standing on a manicured lawn, riding an elephant, etc. and then the shots of logan, in which he is always shown from behind, or far away. It is a childhood the viewer never gets to see in any other context, since there are no flashbacks in the show, and therefore as integral as it seems, we know almost nothing about it. What exactly happened? What are the details? We feel its presence, we can tell how it informs their relationships, we can put together the pieces of incomplete and contradictory memories expressed through dialogue, and if we trace their struggles and dysfunction back far enough we know it leads there, to when they were kids. But there is so much empty space we can’t fill in. It’s almost like their childhood is presented in that horror technique where you never get to see the monster clearly straight on. It’s always in darkness, and chopped up into close-ups so that the viewer’s imagination is forced to invent something, however vague, and that is far scarier than it would be if we could actually see it — a monster that is terrifying BECAUSE it’s unknown. The roy siblings’s childhood is a major force behind so much that happens on screen, but what specifically occurred is out of the reach of our understanding. We are shown the monster’s shadow but not the monster, we are shown the frightened faces of the characters as they look at something behind the camera we never get to see, we are shown the running or the fighting or the blood but never the true, bigger-picture, clear details of the horror itself
2K notes
·
View notes
dungeon meshi posting again, some complaining and some thoughts about izutsumi
maybe the algo is just bad but i hate how all the discussion ive seen of last episode sauna scene is just about people either lusting after izutsumi (a 17 year old who is deliberately written to be like a child and immature) or defending laios from sex pest allegations
like is no one gonna talk about how izutsumi doesnt consider herself human and aligns herself more with "beast"? its clear she was treated as an object for as long as she can remember, first being on display at that show, and then being owned by toshiros family. shes been treated more like a cat than a girl her entire life so of course she'd think itd be ridiculous to give her a modesty curtain. you dont give a modesty curtain to your pet cat when it walks around your house without clothes on. i think thats also an element of why she wants to get rid of the curse in addition to it being something done to her without her knowledge or permission. if she can separate the cat and the human parts, she can finally live life with the freedoms afforded to humans. like, as a cat she is always someones property no matter the culture or practices, even if she was a stray someone else could always decide what to do with her and where she can live and be alive. as a human she believes can do what she wants, go where she wants, live and be seen as someone deserving of life rather than as a cat that got too big
51 notes
·
View notes
There's such a tragedy in being undead it fucks me up. I think the only media that really touches on the aspect of the undead I wish to see more of is Frankenstein. That bitter loneliness and wanting to belong. The creature's plight of wanting to be human but never being able to achieve it. That aspect of looking and feeling *almost* human. But not quite. Knowing you once were, but not remembering what it felt like.
And then taking that idea and applying it to zombies. That need to feast on flesh. To feel alive and whole again. To be forever starved and wanting. Unable to die but unable to live. Stuck in a tormented purgatory. Endlessly devouring helpless souls, condemning them to the same fate as your own. Damned for eternity for sins you don't remember committing
90 notes
·
View notes
‘Eddie Munson should have died at the hands of the government instead of the Upside Down’ please expound on this your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
okay, i am finally gonna release from the vault a text post i had drafted months ago about how reductive and bland i find eddie munson's "heroism" arc.
from a characterization standpoint, i totally understand why eddie declares himself a coward for running after witnessing chrissy (and later, patrick) die. his image of himself as a proud outcast willing to brandish a middle finger at societal norms, bolstered by playing a "satanic" game about misfits coming together to bravely face great evils, is completely shattered. however, from our viewpoint as an audience, eddie does what just about any of us would have done after watching someone die in a horrific, unexplainable manner and not knowing if what happened to them is about to happen to us.
...except the show then does this weird thing where it agrees with eddie's warped, guilty view of his actions. eddie is a coward for running. he should have...what? stayed, again not knowing if he would be killed next, tried to explain everything to hawkins pd, and gotten arrested? (which would have derailed the rest of the hawkins plot because, unless dustin & company staged a jailbreak, eddie then would have been in custody during fred and patrick's murders.) the plot demands he run, but to wring any sort of emotional catharsis out of his death, the writers want us to think "look! he's redeemed himself! this time he ran into the danger!" it equates self-preservation with selfishness and cowardice, which certainly isn't a new thing in media but it's boring and doesn't reflect reality.
and when you parallel eddie's death with billy's (and what i imagine steve's death would have been had they gone through with killing him in season one), it paints this uncomfortable picture that redemption can only be found through extreme self-sacrifice and ultimately death. boring! very boring! and again, why are we redeeming a character who doesn't need redemption?
i appreciate (and really like actually!) that the narrative dooms eddie from the beginning. there wouldn't have been a satisfying way to write him out of a triple homicide rap had he lived. that being said, i would have loved to see eddie survive the upside down, get arrested for the murders, and, while our intrepid heroes are expecting owens and his shadowy government contacts to swoop in, be killed by those same shadowy government contacts as a cover-up.
because that is all owens has been doing for the past three seasons: covering things up to save a fringe organization's ass. it's just been convenient for our gang that the cover-ups align with their interests, too, to the point they are over-reliant on owens stepping in with forged birth certificates and mall fires. only, in season four's case, eddie is the most convenient cover story. with owens left for dead in a bunker in the middle of the desert, what loyalty does the rest of this strange government operation have to the gang and to eddie that they would exert any additional effort concocting a more outlandish story than the easy one the town of hawkins has already bought into?
it would have been a great way to add additional stakes going into season five because the gang would have had absolutely no one to rely on or trust but themselves. no more clean-up crew to plant fake stories and file the paperwork. the government has never actually been on their side. it's hawkins against the upside down and the world, baby.
wow, this is so long and i am so sorry. i still have a lot of feelings about this apparently, even after all this time.
172 notes
·
View notes