#Marc Coleman

[deepredradio]

Shivers Film Festival 2022

Shivers Film Festival 2022

Ein Kino, 3 Tage und 8 Filme quer durchs fantastische Genre. Das SHIVERS lädt vom 18.-20.11.2022 zum schauen und verweilen ein. Nach gut 6 Ausgaben mit knapp 80 Langfilmen und über hundert Kurzwerken, holt das Zebrateam zum siebten Schlag aus und bringt euch ein kontrastreiches Novemberwochenende mit großen Schauwerten, Geheimtipps und tollen Deutschlandpremieren. Was genau läuft, verrät euch…

[missronniemakmissi]

Zenday after the Louis Vuitton Womenswear Spring/Summer 2024 show during Paris Fashion Week on Oct. 2, 2023.

Style: Law Roach. Zendaya in an archival Louis Vuitton babydoll blouse from the brand's Spring 2004 collection by Marc Jacobs. She accessorized the look with strappy white stilettos and a coveted and rare bag from the house's collaboration with Takashi Murakami.

[chalamet-chalamet]

Timothée Chalamet and Zendaya at the ‘Dune: Part Two’ premiere in Seoul on February 22, 2024. 💫

Twitter credit to parabe11umm

[shrutithemisfit]

MY HAPPY PILLS

[gatutor]

Marc Lawrence-Rita Hayworth "Criminals of the air" 1937, de Charles C. Coleman.

[ice-hockey-is-pretty-cool]

So, of course I’m going to wish Marc-André Fleury a happy birthday but how come Vegas doesn’t wish their own player a happy birthday???

Zach Whitecloud, I wish you a very happy birthday as well.

And you too Blake Coleman, while I’m at it.

If it’s your birthday today, have a very happy fucking birthday.

[fdmlovesfashion]

Celebrating SPRING with LEESA ROWLAND in NYC

Catching up! Celebrating Spring with LEESA ROWLAND and friends in NYC. The charismatic Actress, Philanthropist and Author had a fete celebrating her recent Park cover in the East Village, New York. Wearing a custom collection floral dress made by fashion designer Marc Bouwer, friends came downtown to celebrate. NEW YORK, NY – APRIL 3: Leesa Rowland attends Leesa Rowland Cover Party At Populares…

[milliondollarbaby87]

Still Working 9 to 5 (2022) Review

In 1980 the comedy film 9 to 5 starring Jane Fonda, Dolly Parton, Lily Tomlin and Dabney Coleman raised some talking points, behind the laughter some serious issues were at its core with the treatment of women within office enviornments. 40 years after the film Still Working 9 to 5 explores if things have ever got better for women in the workplace? ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Continue reading Untitled

[letzternachtzug]

ZENDAYA COLEMAN ph. by Marc Piasecki/Stephane Cardinale - taken during the "Challengers" Paris Photocall at Maison de l'Amerique Latine on April 06, 2024 in Paris, France

[legendarytragedynacho]

Zendaya's Dune2 press tour looks.

1.- Zendaya Wore Mugler by Casey Cadwallader To The ‘Dune: Part Two’ London Premiere

2.- Zendaya attended the London premiere of "Dune: Part Two", and wore a futuristic silver armor outfit from Mugler's 1995 haute couture collection

3.- Zendaya wore a two-piece gold custom 3D rose jacquard sleeveless cropped hoodie with matching pleated skirt by Louis Vuitton - Resort 2023 collection and Bulgari & Louis Vuitton jewelry

4.- Zendaya attends the London Photocall for "Dune: Part Two" at IET London on February 14, 2024 in London, England

5.- Zendaya attends the red carpet for the movie 'Dune: Part Two' at Auditorio Nacional on February 6, 2024 in Mexico City, Mexico. She wore Bottega Veneta 2 pieces

6.- Zendaya Wore Alaïa's La Robe Spirale  dress from the Fall 2024 collection To The ‘Dune: Part Two’ Paris Photocall

7.- Zendaya Coleman in a custom Torisheju skirt set At Dune Part 2 Premiere In Mexico

8.- Zendaya in Duna's premiere: Part 2, in Seoul on February 22, Dressing Alexander McQueen for Givenchy 1999. Credits: Getty

📷 Samir Hussein/WireImage Medios y Media/Getty, Dave Benett/WireImage, Marc Piasecki/WireImage, Jaime Nogales/Medios y Media/Getty, Pascal Le Segretain/Getty

[fyjennalouisecoleman]

Jenna Coleman and Phoebe Tonkin attend the Chanel Haute Couture Fall/Winter 2023/2024 show as part of Paris Fashion Week on July 04, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Marc Piasecki/WireImage)

[youngpettyqueen]

Alright because I’ve gotten 2 things now from who I think might be one person: let’s talk about the issues I have with Harry Kim

First of all, I want to be perfectly clear: my thoughts on Garrett Wang’s acting are specifically about how he plays Harry Kim, and nothing else. I haven’t seen him in anything else, so I can’t comment on his abilities as an actor outside of Voyager. In Voyager, I do oftentimes feel he isn’t very convincing and often comes across as whiny. Again, this is ONLY about him in Voyager. If anybody would like to recommend me other things he’s done, I’ll happily check them out

This isn’t a sentiment I only have about him, or about Asian actors/characters. To name a few, I feel this way about Marc Blucas, Dominic Keating in the last 2 seasons of Enterprise, Jenna Louise-Coleman in her seasons of Doctor Who, and Richard Madden in Eternals. I’m also not obsessed with hating on Harry, but I’ll acknowledge that I shouldn’t be putting my grievances in the tags and clogging them up. For that, I apologize, and when I can go through my tags at home after work today, I will edit tags

I also feel that I haven’t been clear enough on the fact that a lot of my problems with Harry stem from the writing. I’ve tried to be clear on this, but I think I’ve failed to be. For that I also apologize. I think it’s an injustice that Harry isn’t afforded much in the way of character growth, and it truly pisses me off that he ends the show the same way he started it. Voyager is a show that has a very diverse cast for it’s time, but ultimately it fails to deliver with its characters of colour, and sidelines them to a ridiculous extent. This is an issue I’ve had with Trek as a whole, and have discussed multiple times on this blog. Harry gets it bad in Voyager, and I think it’s unfortunate and infuriating, because he deserved better and didn’t get it simply because he was an Asian man in a 90s TV series

To the recommendation I’ve gotten to research Asian depictions in western media: I already do this. I’m actively anti-racist, and I’m constantly seeking out ways that I can be a better ally, and I do my research so that I can always be the best I can be. I constantly challenge myself to unpack racism within myself. It’s why I’m confident that my issues with Harry Kim aren’t because he’s Asian. I don’t feel this way about any other Asian character I’ve encountered, and I don’t even feel this way about any other roles Garrett Wang has played. I’m not writing him off as a bad actor, I just don’t think he’s very good in this one specific show. I will happily check out other roles of his, because I don’t let one show cloud my judgement of an actor as a whole

Moving forward, I won’t be putting any negative posting I might do in the tags. I apologize for not doing this in the first place. I should have, but I didn’t, and that’s on me. I hope this post makes it clear where I’m coming from with him, and that most of my issues with him stem from how he was poorly handled by writers and how infuriating it is to me that he was poorly handled because of racism

[vague-humanoid]

@socialistexan @redstarovermoundcity @meanmisscharles @moonisneveralone @startorrent02 @chrisdornerfanclub

But just briefly to sketch it out for folks, what happens. After the Civil War, the state of Texas, like many other Southern states, were economically devastated. So you have this huge land grab by wealthy folks, some people of the old planter class, but also an influx of Northern and European capital coming to the state of Texas to take advantage of the cheap land. They start buying up tremendous amounts of land across the state. And it just so happened that this was occurring at the same time of this new invention called barbed wire. And barbed wire, as a Texan, it’s very ubiquitous. It’s a part of growing up, getting your jeans cut on it or something like that someday.

But rather than it being something that people embraced, people fought against it, because what barbed wire represented to them was the end of what was called the open range. The idea that the land belonged to everybody. And you had these big land barons coming to the state, and also established Texas ranchers, buying up more and more land and then putting up barbed wire all around it.

And they did this with such enthusiasm. They weren’t just covering up their land, they were covering over public roads, public waterways, all across the state of Texas. So you see this physical impediment to life in the state. Literally, it was difficult to go from county to county even if you were just traveling, but certainly for people who made their living off of the land, particularly landless cowboys. This became a huge impediment to their life.

So at first, people started cutting down the barbed wire solely out of necessity. I got to get my cattle over here, there’s barbed wire in the middle, we’re going to cut it. But it very quickly became this vigilante movement. And all across the state, large groups of people started organizing themselves into different gangs to cut down these fences.

Of course, it being Texas, the landowners soon hired a bunch of goons with guns to shoot at the fence cutters, and the fence cutters armed themselves, too, and thus the Fence Cutting Wars began in earnest. And there were multiple incidents of shooting fights and things like that happening across the state of Texas.

Marc Steiner:  And I love some of the names of the fence cutting gangs, names like the Owls, the Javelinas, the Blue Devils, the Knights of the Nippers [laughs].

David Griscom:  And it’s a fascinating thing if you read into it. The Nippers in particular, which are the implements they were using to cut down these fences, it became a badge of honor. So you could go into a bar or a saloon in the state of Texas and people would proudly wear them on their hip [Steiner laughs] to indicate that they were with this rebellion, which is really cool.

Marc Steiner:  It also has this complexity. I want to talk a bit about that. It’s something that you don’t read about much, these Texas Fence Cutting Wars. But let’s talk for a minute just about where Texas was then. The post-Civil War, the contradictions of race and racism. There’s this one quote you have in there. I’m sure it was very mixed in terms of some people allied with Chicanos and Mexican Americans and Black folks who were freed, and some people despise that. You have this line here, says some of the fence cutters in post-Reconstruction who hated the progressive policies of Reconstruction.

The quote is, “Down with monopolies. They can’t exist in Texas, and especially in Coleman County. Away with your foreign capitalists. The range and soul of Texas belong to the heroes of the South. No monopolies, and don’t tax the schools, and don’t tax us to school the ends. Give us homes as God intended. And now gates to churches and towns and schools, and above all give us water for our stock.” The contradictions were there. Talk a bit about that and what you learned in terms of where unity existed, but also where racism divided, and in many ways helped kill the movement.

David Griscom:  This is one of the classic stories about any of these labor uprisings in the South is how effective racism was at breaking them. And certainly it was present in the Fence Cutting Wars. It was also something that, unfortunately, was a player in the Texas socialist movement, which has a very interesting and larger tradition than I think a lot of people expect. But you even had socialists who say, we’re not going to touch that, because if we start talking about racism and things like that, we’re going to get axed. It didn’t matter because the state destroyed the socialist movement pretty early on anyway.

But no, this was, when it comes to this progressive movement, I think there’s two factors at play here. One is, as I noted in the piece, the Fence Cutting Wars was a true grassroots reaction to a problem. But, it wasn’t orchestrated by any kind of political movement. Which, one, meant that you had people acting on their own in their small groups, but it also allowed newspaper men and people unaffiliated directly with the movement to be able to carry on whatever things that they wanted in with it.

That quote right there came from a newspaperman who’s talking about the problems the fence cutters were facing, and then slides in at the end his frustration with the funding of schools for Black folk in the state of Texas.

This is, I think, part of it is one to reckon with and realize the nasty history in the state here, but also to recognize some of the problems when you do have a movement like that. If you don’t have a political wing or the organization that’ll be necessary to push forward your message and things like that, anybody can try and own it. And the Fence Cutting Wars is interesting because it was one that was directly in people’s economic necessity. And I think that’s why there was that interracial component. It’s very different from something in a later time.

But the Southern Tenant Farmers Union, which was a massive union of tenant farmers that had interracial organizing as a plank. The fence cutting didn’t have anything like that. But what the fence cutters had was because it was such a direct threat to Tejanos, to Black folk, to poor whites, that it became interracial just because of the economic necessity. And one of the tragedies, I think, of the Fence Cutting Wars was that it wasn’t able to harness itself into a larger political movement. Now, people in it ended up joining movements after. But this upsurge that we saw was scattered very quickly.

[liskantope]

Since I have a continuing history of keeping up with IDW-ish podcasters on YouTube (Glenn Loury, Coleman Hughes, etc.) who occasionally do episodes on trans issues as well as a spotty history of clicking on videos with clips of Jordan Peterson, the algorithm recommends a lot of videos on "transgenderism" and "the trans debate" and so on to me. A noticeable and (to my thinking) really concerning aspect of the whole set of issues is how reliably anyone who expresses interest in debating or even critically discussing trans issues is, um, on one general side of them, and how little debating or critical discussion there seems to be available. I avoid clicking on videos with titles involving "transgenderism" or "transgender ideology" or "the trans debate" and other tribal buzzwords for a bunch of reasons, but I decided to make an exception the other day when I saw a video entitled "DEBATE: does transgender ideology threaten liberal values?" (a terribly-phrased question, like most debate questions are) because it appeared to be... an actual debate! With people on both sides showing up! (Though apparently not among the audience, which by the sound of it was entirely on the anti-trans side.)

So of course, as I should have fully expected, this debate only supported my conviction that the rhetoric of nearly everyone on all sides of this is just terrible. The only nuanced and halfway decent debater here was Peter Tatchell (on the trans rights side), and some of even his arguments were used to catch him in a bind later on (more on that later). The debate as a whole was generally a bit of a -- I can only use the term shitshow here -- with debaters (mainly Freda) interrupting each other, the (seemingly entirely anti-trans) audience heckling the trans-rights debaters, and the somewhat awkward and ineffectual moderator mostly failing to keep everyone in order. Well, what better could I have expected?

Marc Glendening (on the anti-trans-rights side) had less to say than everyone else and was basically just a robot trying to churn out dry legal summaries of the situation and spouting claims about free speech rights being taken away that I find extremely dubious as phrased by him (I don't know too much about what's going on in the UK, but if we took Marc's depictions of the situation at face value, they do not jibe with his teammate Helen's completely lack of inhibition in misgendering Freda in a video-recorded debate!).

Helen Joyce was the only person involved that I was familiar with from before, since many months ago I watched an episode of Coleman Hughes' podcast where he interviewed her, thought she had some reasonable points and liked her overall rational manner of arguing, but lost any sense of her credibility because of her completely unbending and extreme absolutism. YouTube had been recommending me videos with her ever since (I really hate how stubborn the algorithm is), and I had refused up until now to click on anything involving her again. In this debate I saw the same extremist tendencies and genuine TERFiness (up until fairly recently my exposure to TERF ideology was mostly indirect as something people on Tumblr criticized and I was beginning to wonder how much of it was actually out there in force and what it really looks like -- it seems to have plenty of force in the UK and Joyce is probably one of the gentler examples I suppose!) and also saw a rational and dignified approach which I admire but unfortunately didn't lead to actually good arguments. There is plenty of room for rebuttal to Helen's arguments from my perspective, and of course almost none of that material was ever rebutted by the other side, which again doesn't surprise me given how little (in my experience of watching/reading criticisms of, say, JKR's arguments) people on the trans rights side seem to actually directly address certain types of opposing arguments. I can't decide which bothers me more: Helen's repeated comments about how the rest of the debaters went through male puberty and therefore their male voices enabled them to talk over her (easily refuted, mainly in the case of the trans women sitting on the other side, and meanwhile neither of the men ever interrupted or talked over her, but nobody addressed this, and it places Helen across my personal "too borderline-misandristic for me to feel comfortable hanging around her" line), or her claim that those men who do insist on trespassing women-only spaces have proved that they are among the dangerous ones because they don't care about women's boundaries (a very dangerous mentality, and displaying exquisite lack of theory of mind, and again nobody tried to rebut it).

Freda Wallace is... a complete mess, and I think an embarrassment to her cause. She spoke a lot (while delusionally muttering that Helen wouldn't stop talking), and very little of what she had to say comprised actual argumentation but was more of a semi-incoherent jumble of points that often ended in punchlines that seemed to be deliberately phrased into ridiculous and bizarre statements perhaps crafted to be provocative and eliciting scorn from the audience. She frequently interrupted all three of the debaters generally with childish and semi-irrelevant ad hominems, even eventually visibly pissing off her own teammate Peter. Freda appears to be exactly the caricature of aggressive, loud, attention-seeking, obnoxious, shameless, hedonistic, fetishistic trans woman that J. K. Rowling types seem to imagine among trans activists. ("So, when I fuck men, with my female penis, in fetish clubs, it is my choice. It doesn't matter what you think. And those men support Sex Matters, because in public they will, but in private, they'll fuck me [ending in a smug grin]" is... I guess technically a way that someone can talk during a recorded public debate, but maybe shouldn't be recommended? I didn't notice until I read the comments later how a minute or two after that, her teammate Peter repeated tries to get her to stop interrupting, then gently grabs her arm as she lifts her glass of wine again saying, "No more drink.") If the trans-rights organization involved wanted to strengthen transphobia and transmisogyny in particular, they probably could not have chosen a better trans woman to put on their team. There's something to discuss here (although if I tried to develop where I speculatively want to go with this, I might quickly get myself into hot water) about how difficult it seems to be to get a member of the trans community to participate in an event like this, and how it requires the very thickest-skinned type of personality which unfortunately in this case also coincides with the most loud and shameless. (This is a very under-developed and perhaps sloppily-phrased point that I probably shouldn't be leaving in this post!)

As I said earlier, Peter Tatchell, along with many of his arguments, I actually liked; he seems like a pretty cool guy all around. He did get backed into a corner at one point through an audience member's question: he had repeatedly made the argument that excluding male-bodied people from women's shelters because men are more likely to be violent was choosing to treat an entire group based on a generalization and that he was against this on principle (compare to refusing to allow immigration from certain groups because some tiny minority of them is more likely to be dangerous, etc.), and he was asked whether he wasn't generalizing in the exact same way by being in favor of excluding cis men ("all men, as you identify who's a man") from women's spaces. At first Peter seems to misunderstand that the questioner is talking about cis men and be trying to duck the question, but eventually he is backed into acknowledging the question and taking the stance that "people who present as men" should be excluded from women's bathrooms but trans women shouldn't -- a position that sounds quite blatantly transphobic in more than one way by the lights of much of trans activism! Also, Peter's stern coldness in stopping Freda from interrupting him with disagreement during his point about transness showing in people's brains says all we really need to know about his opinion of his own teammate, and I do kind of feel bad for him for having been paired with her, which I imagine was not his choice.

I looked briefly through the comments section to see if there was any discussion of why the video (annoyingly) cuts off abruptly before the end of the event (which wound up mentioned only once that I could see). Never have I seen a sea of comments so 100% skewed in favor of one side of an issue and in one direction: how amazing Helen Joyce is (and with a heap of derogatory and sometimes extremely transmisogynistic comments about Freda Wallace -- they go further than Joyce did by naming her Fred, a few do call her Freda and use feminine pronouns, but in at least one instance someone's use of "her" was "corrected" in a one-word response by another commenter!). It makes me wonder what happens to create a section of hundreds of comments that are literally 100% on one side -- is there a sort of tipping point when one side becomes a strong enough majority that everyone on the other side is just afraid to comment, or gets downvoted to invisibility by the rating system? Either way, this debate strikes me as weak enough on the pro-trans side that trans right activists probably wouldn't want to advertise it on YouTube.

Anyway, very very discouraging for anyone who would like our public discourse on this set of issues to stop being more of a complete mess than the public discourse on pretty much every other contentious social issue has been.

[florekunst]

Nouvelle participation à un recueil des éditions Joie Panique: "MA LANGUE SUR TON CŒUR" qui réunit textes et images sur l'amour par 70 artistes du monde entier ! Merci à C&C !

(Collage réalisé d'après un texte de Pierre Louÿs)

15 x 22 cm // 144 pages // reliure cartonnée cousue // embossage sur la couverture // tranchefile // beau papier intérieur Maestro 140 g. // 27 euros

À commander ici ☞ www.joiepanique.company.site

Avec :

Céline Guichard • Maldo Nollimerg • Flore Kunst • Joe Coleman • Sarah Lee • Mïrka Lugosi • Mokeït Van Linden • Musta Fior • Romano Valsky • Raphaël Tachdjian • Joël Hubaut • Marinka Masséus • Daisuke Ichiba • Anne Marie Grgich • Koichi Yamamoto • Axelle Kieffer • Tom de Pekin • Marc Brunier-Mestas • Iris Terdjiman • Ffo Art • Darédo • Laurent Bouckenooghe • Stéphane Blanquet • Wayne Horse • Dressen McQueen • Nico Mazza • Magali Cazo • Gilles Berquet • Vincent Bizien • Alessandra Roccasalva • Foued Mokrani • Myriam Mechita • Sevde Hallaç • Sœurs Siamoises • Carla van de Puttelaar • Rosanna Staus • Aya Ogasawara • Mu Blondeau • Miroslav Weissmuller • Philippe N • Paul Cristina • Asako Yamasaki • Barbara Breitenfellner • Brulex • Maï • Eléonore & Kenny • Mirza Cizmic • Siméon Droulers • Romy Alizée • Alan Feltus • Noah Saterstrom • Sergio Bonilla • Annabelle Guetatra • Yasemin Senel • Karin Rosenthal • Maïc Baxane • Rubén Garzás Gómez • Camille Bertagna • Michel Lascault • Philippe Dupuy • Lorenzo Mattotti • Giacomo Nanni • Dadu Shin • Julien Pacaud • Sarah Leterrier • Daniele Steardo • Frédéric Bélonie • Marie-Pierre Brunel • Joseba Eskubi

[hejihra]

8 shows to get to know me by

I was tagged by the lovely @emiliosandozsequence 💜

Rectify - This is a show that absolutely destroyed me. It's very heavy at times, and some of the subject matter can hit home and be quite triggering. However there is a sense of light, and that even though all this bad has happened it'll be ok.

The Americans - if you want a show that maintains its momentum for 6 seasons look no further. It's packed full of crazy moments, and incredible music. Also it makes me insane knowing that the 2 lead actors got married because they reunited on this show after like 20 years(??)

Better Call Saul - listen...they may have lost at the emmys but they're winners in my heart. This is not only a prequel but a sequel to Brba. The tone/visual shift in this show imo is one of its strongest points. Along with the incredible acting/writing, it's a fun time.

Friday Night Lights - I don't know what they put into this show, but I now love football...so yeah.

Broadchurch - never did watch the 3rd season, but 1 & 2 are perfect and wrap up everything nicely so I didn't feel the need to continue. Again you're dealing with some heavy material, and Olivia Coleman is in it so idk what else you could want.

Sharp Objects - This is a short 8 episode series based off of the book by Gillian Flynn, and it's a pretty good adaptation. The attention to detail in this show was insane, and the cinematography was stunning( rip to Jean-Marc Vallée )

True Detective - like most people I'll be talking about S1 of this series, and that's cause so far it's the best 1 to have come out. Nothing has topped it, it was an 8 episode home run. I don't think I've ever felt this satisfied while watching something, because it leaves no questions unanswered.

My so called life - this didn't deserve to get canceled. Like you don't understand how crazy this makes me. Rayanne Graff I love you 4 ever 💕

I'll tag - @deadwivesclub , @iskarieot , @quinnmagdalene ,@sahtrn , @iloveyoumorethangod

Don't feel any pressure to do this, I just feel like y'all have good taste.