#New York Attorney

[dollarsbag]

How Much Will  NYC Injury Attorney Charge to Handle the Case in New York? Read here!

How Much Will  NYC Injury Attorney Charge to Handle the Case in New York? Read here! When you’ve been injured in New York, you may be wondering how much it will cost to hire a personal injury attorney to handle your case. New York personal injury lawyers typically work on a contingency fee basis, which means they take a percentage of the recovery. In this article, we’ll delve into the specifics…

[alwaysbewoke]

[weepingwidar]

Martin Wong (Chinese-American, 1946-1999) - Attorney Street: Handball Court with Autobiographical Poem by Piñero (1982-1984)

[reasonsforhope]

"A New York grand jury has indicted Donald Trump on allegations linked to a business records investigation related to a "hush money" payment made to adult film star Stormy Daniels. Trump is the first former president in U.S. history to face criminal charges. His attorney Susan Necheles confirmed the indictment. No other details have been released yet.

The specific charge or charges have not yet been made public, and one Trump attorney told CBS News his legal team is "still waiting to learn" details of the indictment.

Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg's office said in a statement that it had contacted Trump's attorney "to coordinate his surrender to the Manhattan D.A.'s office for arraignment on a Supreme Court indictment, which remains under seal," and more guidance would be provided "when the arraignment date is selected." ...

The case stems from a payment made just days before Trump was elected president in 2016. His former attorney, Michael Cohen, arranged a $130,000 wire transfer to Daniels to buy her silence about an alleged affair...

The indictment comes as Trump faces other potential criminal cases. In Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis is mulling charges in an investigation into alleged efforts by Trump and more than a dozen of his allies to undermine [Georgia]'s results in the 2020 election, which he lost to President Joe Biden. A special purpose grand jury conducted a six-month probe last year and delivered a report with its findings to Willis in January. The majority of that report was ordered sealed, at least until charging decisions are made.

In Washington, D.C., special counsel Jack Smith is overseeing two Justice Department investigations into alleged efforts to interfere with the lawful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election, and Trump's handling of sensitive government documents [note: specifically top secret, classified documents] found at his Mar-a-Lago home and possible obstruction of efforts to retrieve them."

-via CBS News, 3/30/23

TRUMP'S BEEN INDICTED

And by the way he is going to have to surrender himself to the Manhattan DA's office...

Where he will be arrested, fingerprinted, and have his mug shot taken.

(Obviously/sadly he's going to be released instead of held in jail until trial, but STILL)

-via BBC News, 3/30/23

[vertigoartgore]

Daredevil and The Owl Commission by John K. Snyder III.

[ridenwithbiden]

[sestrahulk]

Tatiana Maslany at Broadway Barks, July 8th 2023

[higherentity]

[reasoningdaily]

New York Attorney General Letitia James asked a judge Wednesday for a partial summary judgment against Donald Trump in her $250 million lawsuit accusing the former president of widespread fraud, citing what she called a "mountain of undisputed evidence" of false and misleading financial statements.

James, in her motion, says Engoron has to answer just "two simple and straightforward questions" to make that finding.

One question is whether Trump's annual statements of his financial condition were "false or misleading," the attorney general wrote. The other question, she wrote, is whether Trump and his co-defendants repeatedly used the financial statements to conduct business transactions. "The answer to both questions is a resounding 'yes' based on the mountain of undisputed evidence cited" in the documentation submitted by James' office, the motion said. "Based on the undisputed evidence, no trial is required for the Court to determine that Defendants presented grossly and materially inflated asset values in the SFCs [financial statements] and then used those SFCs repeatedly in business transactions to defraud banks and insurers," James wrote.

In a court filing, James said evidence shows that if Trump's net worth were correctly calculated, it would be between 17% and 39% lower than what he claimed each year over the course of a decade, "which translates to the enormous sum of $1 billion or more in all but one year."

The allegedly false statements included years when Trump was in the White House, according to the filing.

James' filing comes two months before the trial is set to begin in the civil suit against the former president; the Trump Organization; and his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, at New York Supreme Court in Manhattan.

James is suing the Trumps for allegedly defrauding banks, insurance companies and others with the use of false financial statements.

That trial would still take place to address other claims, even if Judge Arthur Engoron grants James' request for partial summary judgment and finds Trump and the other defendants committed fraud under New York business law.

James, in her motion, says Engoron has to answer just "two simple and straightforward questions" to make that finding.

One question is whether Trump's annual statements of his financial condition were "false or misleading," the attorney general wrote.

The other question, she wrote, is whether Trump and his co-defendants repeatedly used the financial statements to conduct business transactions.

"The answer to both questions is a resounding 'yes' based on the mountain of undisputed evidence cited" in the documentation submitted by James' office, the motion said.

"Based on the undisputed evidence, no trial is required for the Court to determine that Defendants presented grossly and materially inflated asset values in the SFCs [financial statements] and then used those SFCs repeatedly in business transactions to defraud banks and insurers," James wrote.

"Notwithstanding Defendants' horde of 13 experts, at the end of the day this is a documents case, and the documents leave no shred of doubt that Mr. Trump's SFCs do not even remotely reflect the 'estimated current value' of his assets as they would trade between well-informed market participants," the motion said.

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

A former aide to former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani says he told her the ex-New York City mayor and then-president Donald Trump were offering to sell presidential pardons for $2 million apiece, according to court documents.

The bombshell allegation was levied in a complaint filed against Mr. Giuliani by Noelle Dunphy, a New York-based public relations professional who is suing him for “unlawful abuses of power, wide-ranging sexual assault and harassment, wage theft, and other misconduct” committed while she worked for him in 2019 and 2020.

The lawsuit also claims that she was subjected to sexual assault, harassment, wage theft and other misconduct by Mr. Giuliani, and alleges that she was forced to perform sex acts on him and work in the nude.

Ms. Duphy’s lawsuit details an interaction she allegedly had with Mr. Giuliani on or about 16 February 2019, when he was serving as Mr. Trump’s personal attorney and attempting to dig up overseas dirt on then-former Vice President Joe Biden, who at the time was two months away from entering the 2020 presidential race against Mr. Trump.

She writes that as they reviewed emails between him and Ukrainian government officials, she asked if he had to register as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act and offered to do the required paperwork for him.

The former mayor replied that he was allowed to violate FARA and other US laws because “[he had] immunity”, according to the lawsuit.

She then states that Mr. Giuliani asked her “if she knew anyone in need of a pardon” because he was “selling pardons for $2 million, which he and President Trump would split.”

“He told Ms. Dunphy that she could refer individuals seeking pardons to him, so long as they did not go through 'the normal channels' of the Office of the Pardon Attorney, because correspondence going to that office would be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act,” the suit added.

During Mr Trump’s presidency, he frequently granted pardons to wealthy or well-connected individuals without the involvement of the Pardon Attorney, the Department of Justice official who is charged with reviewing petitions for executive clemency and making recommendations as to whether a given petition should be granted.

No evidence has ever emerged that either Mr. Trump or Mr. Giuliani were ever compensated for any presidential pardon granted during Mr. Trump’s time in office, but Ms. Dunphy’s allegation matches that made by another person who once sought a pardon from the then-president.

In August, The New York Times reported that former CIA officer John Kiriakou broached the topic with Mr. Giuliani during a meeting at the Washington D.C. hotel Mr. Trump’s company ran between 2016 and 2022.

Mr. Kiriakou, who in 2012 was sentenced to nearly three years in prison for disclosing classified information, told the Times that one of Mr. Giuliani’s associates at the meeting said the ex-New York City mayor could assist him — for a price.

“It’s going to cost $2 million — he’s going to want two million bucks,” he recalled the Giuliani associate as saying.

He also told the Times that he did not pursue a pardon through Mr. Giuliani because he could not afford to pay him $2 million.

“I laughed. Two million bucks — are you out of your mind?” Kiriakou told the outlet. “Even if I had two million bucks, I wouldn’t spend it to recover a $700,000 pension,” he said.

Ted Goodman, a spokesperson for and adviser to Mr. Giuliani, told The Independent in an email that the former New York mayor “unequivocally denies the allegations raised by Ms. Dunphy.”

“Mayor Giuliani’s lifetime of public service speaks for itself and he will pursue all available remedies and counterclaims,” he added.

The Independent has reached out to Mr. Trump’s team for comment.

[dontmean2bepoliticalbut]

[alwaysbewoke]

[ausetkmt]

The Associated Press

Judge rules Donald Trump defrauded banks, insurers while building real estate empire https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-letitia-james-fraud-lawsuit-1569245a9284427117b8d3ba5da74249

[reasonsforhope]

"After days of uncertainty and speculation, it’s actually happened: Former President Donald Trump has officially been indicted by a Manhattan grand jury on charges of, reportedly, more than 30 counts related to business fraud.

The charges are still under seal, but they are expected to be related to Trump’s involvement in hush money payments made to porn performer Stormy Daniels and associated efforts to falsify business records. The indictment is a historic one, making Trump the only former president who’s ever been criminally charged.

The news begs a key question: What is an indictment, anyway?

Basically, it means a person is formally being charged with a felony by a grand jury. Charging someone in this manner is required in many felony cases, like the one involving Trump. As laid out by the New York State Constitution, Trump had to be indicted by a grand jury before prosecutors could proceed further. Now that he has been, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is able to coordinate [Trump's] surrender and pursue a trial.

“When a person is indicted, they are given formal notice that it is believed that they committed a crime,” notes the Department of Justice. “The indictment contains the basic information that informs the person of the charges against them.”

An indictment [note: pronounced in-die-t-ment] is a key step in criminal cases such as this one. First, a prosecutor decides to pursue a case against a person and presents witnesses and evidence in front of what’s known as a grand jury. The grand jury — a randomly selected group of 16 to 23 people — will weigh the information and then decide whether they believe there is probable cause that this person committed a crime and if there should be a trial...

If at least 12 jurors believe there is probable cause and vote to indict, then the person is officially charged and the case has the potential to go to trial. The grand jury does not determine if a person is guilty or not guilty like a trial jury does, however.

Understanding the Trump indictment

What is an indictment?

What happens next?

Can Trump still run for president?

What is the Republican response?

What will this mean for Trump’s 2024 campaign?

In Trump’s case, enough members of the Manhattan grand jury concluded that there is sufficient evidence to charge him with a crime. The indictment includes specific information about the charges and explains what laws the jurors believe Trump broke.

At this point, courts have not ruled on whether he is guilty or not; the grand jury has simply determined that he should be charged and that the case can go to trial. Following an indictment, a prosecutor can decide whether to pursue these charges or to drop them if there’s insufficient evidence. That the process appears to be going forward signals Bragg believes in the grand jury’s findings.

Trump’s next step is to surrender to law enforcement and have the charges read to him in court in what’s known as an arraignment. Trump is reportedly expected to turn himself in on Tuesday, when he’ll be taken into police custody and arrested, at which point his fingerprints and mugshot will also be taken.

He’ll then be arraigned later in the day, when he’ll be able to enter how he pleas in the case. After that, he’ll likely be able to leave without bail since the charges he faces are nonviolent felonies. [Note: apparently this is a recently implemented New York law, not just massive racism and classism in the legal system.]

The trial process for the case could ultimately be a drawn-out one since Trump is expected to contest the charges. If convicted, he could be sentenced to as much as four years in prison, the penalty for falsifying business records."

-via Vox, 3/31/23

[wedesignyouny]

BG Divorce Lawyers: Advantages of a Queens, New York, Uncontested Divorce Attorney

SMOOTH SAILING: THE BENEFITS OF AN UNCONTESTED DIVORCE LAWYER IN QUEENS, NY

Introduction:

Facing the difficult decision of divorce is never easy, but it doesn’t have to be overly complicated and contentious. In Queens, NY, an uncontested divorce lawyer can be your guiding light during this challenging time. An uncontested divorce offers a more amicable and efficient process, allowing both parties to reach agreements on crucial issues without the need for lengthy court battles. In this blog post, we will explore the advantages of hiring an uncontested divorce lawyer at BG Divorce Lawyers to navigate you through this emotional journey and achieve a swift and peaceful resolution.

Understanding Uncontested Divorce:

Before diving into the benefits, let’s first clarify what an uncontested divorce entails. In an uncontested divorce, both spouses work together to resolve issues such as child custody, division of assets, spousal support, and more, without the intervention of a judge. This collaborative approach fosters open communication, reduces conflicts, and lays the groundwork for an amicable separation. An experienced uncontested divorce lawyer plays a crucial role in mediating discussions and ensuring that your rights and interests are protected throughout the process.

Streamlined Process:

One of the primary advantages of choosing an uncontested divorce is the streamlined legal process. Traditional divorces can be time-consuming, costly, and emotionally draining, as they involve numerous court appearances and legal battles. However, with an uncontested divorce lawyer by your side, you can avoid lengthy court procedures and resolve your divorce swiftly and efficiently. This approach not only saves time but also minimizes stress, allowing you to focus on healing and moving forward with your life.

Cost-Effectiveness:

Divorce proceedings can be financially burdensome, particularly in a contested divorce where legal fees can quickly escalate. In contrast, an uncontested divorce typically involves lower legal expenses because both parties are working towards a mutual agreement. By hiring an uncontested divorce lawyer from BG Divorce Lawyers, you can receive professional guidance without breaking the bank, ensuring that your resources are better utilized to secure your post-divorce future.

Customized Solutions:

No two divorces are the same, and each couple faces unique challenges during the process. An uncontested divorce lawyer understands this and tailors solutions to suit your specific needs. Whether it’s crafting a comprehensive parenting plan or negotiating property division, the lawyer will work closely with you to create a customized agreement that aligns with your goals and priorities. This personalized approach empowers you to make informed decisions about your future and the well-being of your children.

Preserving Relationships:

Divorce can strain even the most amicable relationships, but an uncontested divorce fosters a more cooperative environment, helping preserve essential relationships, especially when children are involved. By choosing a collaborative approach, you can lay the groundwork for effective co-parenting and maintain a healthier post-divorce relationship with your former spouse. An uncontested divorce lawyer acts as a mediator, promoting understanding and communication between both parties.

Conclusion:

Navigating the complexities of divorce is undeniably challenging, but with the assistance of an uncontested divorce lawyer from BG Divorce Lawyers in Queens, NY, the process can become significantly more manageable. Through open communication, cost-effective resolutions, and tailored solutions, an uncontested divorce empowers you to embrace a new chapter in your life with less emotional turmoil. Remember, you don’t have to go through this journey alone – a compassionate uncontested divorce lawyer is here to guide you towards a peaceful resolution and a brighter future.

CONTACT INFO

Beckerman & Granados PLLC

118-35 Queens Blvd. Suite 1240 Forest Hills, N.Y. 11375

 info@bgmatlaw.com

(718) 374-5642

(718) 732-2099

[cediweb]

Trump Faces Opening Statements and First Witness in New York Criminal Trial - UPDATES

The trial opened with both sides presenting their cases to the jury. Prosecutors described the case as one of “criminal conspiracy and a cover-up,” while Trump’s defense attempted to discredit the prosecution’s points. The trial involves allegations of a hush money payment scheme to suppress potentially damaging information about Trump ahead of the 2016 election. The first witness, David Pecker,…