#Reflection Points

[civicsavvy]

The Complexity of Donald J. Trump: A Psychological Exploration by Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson’s conversation on Donald J. Trump offers a nuanced, multi-dimensional view of the former president’s personality, leadership style, and the broader psychological impact he has had on society. Peterson approaches Trump not simply as a political figure but as a psychological subject whose behaviors and traits evoke intense reactions, both positive and negative, in the public sphere.

The video is insightful for several reasons, mainly because Peterson, a clinical psychologist, applies his understanding of personality psychology to analyze Trump’s complex personality. By examining Trump’s leadership qualities, public persona, and social impact, Peterson offers a blend of psychological, social, and moral perspectives that reveal how Trump's personality influences not only his own behavior but also his supporters and critics alike. Here are some key points Peterson raises:

1. Public Persona and Influence as a Celebrity

Peterson observes that Trump’s public persona is central to his success. He notes that Trump built his brand as a celebrity and businessman long before entering politics, giving him a unique, almost “larger-than-life” status. His background in real estate and as a television personality shaped his ability to command attention, charm certain audiences, and polarize others. This larger-than-life image, Peterson argues, equipped Trump to break traditional political norms and capture public fascination in a way that few others have been able to achieve.

2. Leadership Style: Bold, Direct, and Unorthodox

Trump’s approach to leadership is bold, often unfiltered, and confrontational, which Peterson suggests aligns with certain personality traits, including high extroversion and assertiveness. This style appeals strongly to his supporters, who see these traits as signs of strength, decisiveness, and authenticity. On the other hand, these same qualities provoke intense opposition and criticism from those who interpret them as aggressive, narcissistic, or dangerous. Peterson sees Trump’s leadership as embodying a kind of “charismatic authority” that deviates from typical political decorum but resonates deeply with a significant portion of the American public.

3. Key Personality Traits: Extroversion, Openness, and Plasticity

Peterson specifically points to Trump’s high levels of extroversion and openness as defining traits. High extroversion often correlates with assertiveness, energy, and sociability, all of which have been apparent in Trump’s public appearances. Openness, which reflects creativity and willingness to embrace novel experiences, is another trait that likely contributes to Trump’s risk-taking and adaptability.

A unique aspect Peterson discusses is “plasticity”—the capacity to adapt and change, which Trump demonstrates through his ability to switch roles and professions, from business mogul to television star to politician. Peterson believes this plasticity allows Trump to survive and thrive in rapidly changing social and economic environments, a skill that has helped him remain relevant across different decades.

4. Humor as a Strategic Tool

Peterson examines Trump’s use of humor, particularly his “ruthless” style, which combines sarcasm, irony, and directness. This humor often disarms his critics, energizes his supporters, and disrupts traditional political rhetoric. Peterson notes that humor is a powerful tool in leadership because it allows a person to communicate complex or controversial messages in a less direct, confrontational way. However, Trump’s style of humor can also alienate people and feed into negative perceptions, especially among those who view him as disrespectful or divisive.

5. Trump’s Appeal to the Working Class

One of the more compassionate aspects of Peterson’s analysis is his acknowledgment of Trump’s empathy for the working class. He argues that Trump’s straightforward, brash communication style resonates with people who feel alienated by political elites. According to Peterson, many working-class Americans appreciate Trump’s perceived authenticity and see him as a defender of their values and economic concerns. This, Peterson posits, may explain why Trump’s support base remains loyal, even when his behavior challenges conventional standards.

6. Empathy, Narcissism, and Agreeableness

Peterson recognizes that Trump’s personality is paradoxical in several ways. For instance, while Trump often displays traits associated with narcissism, he also exhibits moments of genuine empathy, particularly towards those he perceives as “ordinary Americans.” Peterson discusses how Trump’s low agreeableness (a personality trait associated with cooperation and kindness) contributes to his confrontational and competitive demeanor, which some perceive as a lack of empathy. However, Peterson suggests that Trump’s empathy for his base is selective rather than generalized, leading to complex public reactions.

7. Social Media Mastery: Power and Pitfalls of Twitter

Trump’s unique use of Twitter (and other social media platforms) has been a defining aspect of his public image and political influence. Peterson notes that Twitter allows Trump to bypass traditional media and speak directly to his supporters, creating a sense of intimacy and immediacy. However, this direct line of communication also intensifies polarization, as Trump’s unfiltered remarks reach a global audience instantly. Peterson points out that social media amplifies both the positive and negative aspects of Trump’s personality, further fueling division within the public.

8. Controversial Populist Appeal and Psychological Impact

Trump’s approach often aligns with populist themes, positioning himself as an “outsider” against an entrenched political establishment. Peterson suggests that Trump’s populist appeal may be psychologically reassuring to those who feel disempowered, as he promises to “drain the swamp” and restore power to the people. However, this populist stance also invites criticism and concerns about authoritarianism. Peterson weighs these risks carefully, noting that populism can serve as both a force for change and a potential source of division.

9. Adaptability and Reinvention as a Survival Mechanism

Trump’s life is marked by continual reinvention, a quality that Peterson finds psychologically significant. Unlike most people, who become more set in their ways as they age, Trump demonstrates a remarkable ability to adapt, whether it’s shifting from the world of real estate to television or, ultimately, politics. Peterson sees this adaptability as part of Trump’s resilience and success, though he cautions that it can also contribute to volatility.

10. Is Trump Dangerous? Peterson’s Final Thoughts

Peterson concludes his analysis with a reflection on the broader question: “Is Trump dangerous?” While he acknowledges that Trump’s personality can be polarizing, Peterson does not reduce Trump to a purely positive or negative figure. Instead, he emphasizes the complexity of Trump’s influence, arguing that Trump’s impact depends largely on how his personality traits interact with the context and the responses of those around him. Peterson encourages a balanced view that recognizes both Trump’s strengths and potential risks, emphasizing the importance of understanding complex personalities in political leaders.

Conclusion

Dr. Peterson’s analysis of Donald Trump goes beyond simplistic judgments, exploring Trump as a case study in personality, psychology, and social impact. Peterson’s approach is both empathetic and critical, allowing readers to see Trump’s strengths and weaknesses as two sides of the same coin. His focus on Trump’s personality traits—extroversion, openness, and plasticity—helps to explain how Trump’s unconventional behavior connects with a significant portion of the public while also intensifying divisions. Ultimately, Peterson’s conversation sheds light on Trump’s lasting influence and encourages a more nuanced view of one of the most polarizing figures in modern history.

Introduction: Understanding a Controversial Figure

In today’s polarized world, few figures have been as divisive and influential as Donald J. Trump. From his beginnings as a real estate developer and television personality to his tenure as the 45th President of the United States, Trump has reshaped the political landscape and challenged conventional norms in ways that continue to provoke strong reactions. For some, he represents a bold break from the status quo, a leader unafraid to speak his mind and tackle issues with a directness often missing in traditional politics. For others, he embodies a threat to established democratic values, with his unconventional style and polarizing rhetoric deepening the divides in American society.

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson’s approach to examining Trump’s personality offers a unique and thought-provoking perspective. As a clinical psychologist known for his insights into human behavior, Peterson does not attempt to cast Trump simply as a hero or villain. Instead, he approaches Trump as a complex psychological subject, one whose traits and behaviors reveal much about leadership, charisma, and the psychological undercurrents that influence both individual and collective behavior. Peterson’s analysis is grounded in his understanding of personality psychology, which allows him to explore the ways in which Trump’s distinctive personality traits resonate with his supporters while repelling his detractors.

This essay aims to unpack Dr. Peterson’s in-depth examination of Donald Trump’s personality, exploring the ways in which Trump’s traits—such as his high levels of extroversion, his adaptability, and his confrontational style—intersect with the expectations and demands of American political life. Through this lens, readers will gain a clearer understanding of the impact of Trump’s public persona and the reasons why he has become a central figure in contemporary political and social discourse.

In doing so, we will delve into the nature of Trump’s influence: How has his background as a businessman and celebrity shaped his public image? What psychological traits contribute to his leadership style, and why do these traits provoke such strong reactions from people across the political spectrum? How does Peterson’s psychological perspective help us make sense of Trump’s enduring impact on American politics and society?

Through this analysis, we hope to move beyond simplistic judgments and offer a balanced view that highlights both the strengths and challenges presented by Trump’s unique personality. Whether one sees Trump as a transformative figure or a destabilizing force, Dr. Peterson’s insights provide a valuable framework for understanding the psychological and cultural factors that shape our perception of one of the most controversial figures of our time.

In the following ten sections, we will examine specific aspects of Dr. Peterson’s analysis, exploring Trump’s personality traits, leadership style, use of humor, appeal to the working class, and mastery of social media. By approaching each of these topics from a psychological and cultural perspective, we aim to offer readers a comprehensive understanding of the many facets of Trump’s public persona and the lasting impact of his unconventional approach to leadership.

Section 1: The Public Persona – Celebrity and Businessman

Donald Trump’s journey to becoming a household name began long before he entered politics. With roots in New York real estate, he leveraged his business acumen, showmanship, and a keen understanding of branding to build a public persona that blurred the lines between businessman, celebrity, and, eventually, politician. Trump’s rise to fame highlights the ways in which he crafted an identity not only as a real estate mogul but also as a charismatic figure capable of captivating the public’s attention—a skill that would serve him well in his political career.

Trump’s Ascent in Real Estate and Entertainment

Trump’s early success can be attributed to both his ambition and his deep understanding of the value of visibility. Starting his career in his father’s real estate business, Trump quickly established himself as a risk-taker willing to pursue high-profile projects. His ventures included high-rise developments, luxury hotels, and casinos, often emblazoned with his name—a branding choice that symbolized the “Trump” lifestyle and made him synonymous with opulence and success.

Beyond his business ventures, Trump recognized the importance of cultivating his image in the media. His brash style, larger-than-life personality, and unapologetic self-promotion were not just traits but strategic tools that he used to stay in the public eye. By the 1980s and 1990s, he had transformed from a relatively unknown businessman into a public figure whose name alone evoked wealth and status. His ventures may have been financially tumultuous at times, but the strength of his brand allowed him to maintain relevance, demonstrating the power of perception in shaping public influence.

Trump’s role as the host of The Apprentice in the early 2000s took his celebrity status to a new level. The reality TV show presented Trump as a decisive, no-nonsense figure with an aura of authority, cementing his image as a successful businessman who understood the principles of winning and losing. In the eyes of millions, he became a symbol of the American Dream—a self-made success story, whether fully accurate or not. This portrayal tapped into viewers’ aspirations and desire for guidance on achieving success, reinforcing his image as a “man of the people” who had mastered the complexities of both business and life.

The Calculated Moves Behind His Public Persona

Trump’s public persona is not simply a reflection of who he is, but rather a carefully constructed image designed to attract attention and maintain relevance. From his early days, he understood the psychology of fame, recognizing that being controversial could be just as effective as being liked. He embraced controversy as a tool for staying in the public eye, frequently making bold statements that captured headlines and drew widespread attention. This strategy of using shock value to maintain visibility has proven effective, as it aligns with the media’s preference for sensational stories and public fascination with polarizing figures.

Moreover, Trump’s approach to fame involves creating a clear and consistent narrative about himself. He often positions himself as an outsider—a fighter going up against an “establishment” that doesn’t understand or respect him. This narrative resonates with those who feel similarly overlooked or disenfranchised, particularly within the working class. By painting himself as a fighter for the “forgotten man,” Trump has tapped into a powerful, unifying theme that allows him to appeal to a broad demographic despite his wealth and elite status. His understanding of the audience’s desires, combined with his talent for self-promotion, has enabled him to cultivate a following that sees him as both a leader and a relatable figure.

The Psychology of Fame and Attention

Fame, in psychological terms, is a powerful and complex phenomenon. It creates a perception of authority and influence, often regardless of the person’s qualifications or experience. In Trump’s case, his fame has acted as both a protective shield and a magnifying glass. It has allowed him to maintain influence even in the face of controversies, while also amplifying his actions and statements. The “celebrity effect” works to his advantage by drawing public interest and lending credibility to his persona, simply because he is a known figure.

Psychologically, Trump’s rise reveals a deep understanding of the human desire for strong, decisive leaders. Fame provides a sense of familiarity, which often translates into trust, regardless of whether that trust is well-founded. For many, Trump’s persona as a self-made billionaire and television icon made him seem like someone who could “get things done” in the political arena as well. His unfiltered and often provocative style is appealing to those who see it as “real” and unpolished compared to traditional politicians who carefully curate their image.

In the realm of psychology, people are often drawn to larger-than-life figures who embody traits they aspire to or admire, such as confidence, success, and resilience. Trump’s calculated public persona taps into these desires, positioning him as a “winner” in a world where many feel like they are constantly losing. This appeal is enhanced by his unapologetic approach to confrontation and his readiness to challenge anyone who criticizes him, reinforcing the perception of him as someone who doesn’t back down and who “says what others are afraid to say.”

Conclusion

Trump’s early career as a businessman and his role on The Apprentice laid the foundation for his eventual foray into politics by establishing him as a well-known and polarizing figure. His skill in managing his public image and his ability to use fame to his advantage reveal a deep understanding of human psychology and the cultural power of celebrity. As we explore Trump’s political impact, it becomes clear that his public persona—crafted with intent and precision—has played a significant role in shaping public perception, enabling him to transition from a celebrity to a political force in a way that few could have predicted.

In the next section, we will explore how Trump’s personality traits, particularly his high extroversion and adaptability, shape his approach to leadership and contribute to his unconventional style in the political arena. Through Dr. Peterson’s lens, we’ll gain insight into how these traits manifest in Trump’s actions, decisions, and interactions on the world stage.

Section 2: The Leadership Approach – Bold, Unorthodox, and Assertive

Donald Trump’s leadership approach defies many conventions traditionally associated with political figures. His style is characterized by boldness, unorthodoxy, and a direct assertiveness that stands in sharp contrast to the more measured and calculated approaches of typical politicians. His decisions, statements, and overall demeanor are unapologetically straightforward, often provocative, and reveal a leadership approach that prioritizes action, immediate impact, and visible results over long-term strategy or cautious diplomacy.

Trump’s Leadership Style and Decision-Making Processes

Trump’s leadership approach is rooted in his background as a businessman rather than a career politician. Unlike traditional politicians who might value consensus-building and careful deliberation, Trump’s decision-making style is more rapid and instinctive. He often relies on his own judgment and intuition rather than the advice of experts or long-standing protocols. This business-minded approach favors decisive actions, and he is known for making bold moves that he believes will yield immediate benefits, regardless of their polarizing effects.

For example, Trump’s willingness to take risks is evident in some of his highest-profile decisions, including renegotiating trade deals and engaging in unprecedented direct talks with foreign leaders. His decision-making process often emphasizes breaking away from established norms. Rather than gradually working toward change through bipartisan efforts, Trump frequently aims for sweeping, attention-grabbing shifts, positioning himself as a disruptor willing to challenge the status quo.

This approach is both a strength and a liability. His willingness to act decisively has, at times, led to rapid results in areas such as regulatory rollbacks and tax reforms. However, it has also drawn criticism for perceived impulsiveness and a lack of adherence to established processes. Trump’s decision to frequently bypass traditional channels of communication and governance creates an image of unpredictability, which resonates with supporters but can frustrate allies and partners. This unpredictability often keeps opponents off-balance and can serve as a strategic advantage by preventing others from fully anticipating his next move.

The Impact of His Extroverted and Assertive Nature on His Leadership

Trump’s high extroversion and assertive personality play central roles in shaping his leadership style. Extroverts tend to be energized by social interactions and seek out environments where they can assert themselves and stand out. Trump’s preference for rallies, media appearances, and public events showcases his desire for the spotlight and his comfort with engaging large audiences. His assertiveness translates into a leadership style where he does not shy away from expressing his opinions boldly and directly, often challenging or even dismissing those who disagree with him.

His extroverted nature allows him to connect with his audience on a visceral level, speaking in ways that resonate deeply with supporters. Rather than using technical language or carefully worded political jargon, he speaks in a way that feels more conversational and relatable, which has endeared him to many who view him as a “man of the people.” This connection fosters a sense of loyalty and trust, as Trump’s supporters often feel that he speaks directly to their concerns, without the perceived filters or hesitations typical of other politicians.

Trump’s assertive nature also contributes to his combative approach. He is known for responding swiftly and firmly to criticism, whether it’s from political opponents, media figures, or even members of his own administration. This assertiveness creates an image of strength and resilience, appealing to those who prioritize a leader who is unwavering and unyielding. For his supporters, Trump’s confrontational style is seen as a sign of his commitment to stand firm against opposition and to fight on behalf of his ideals, reinforcing his image as a leader who is both bold and fearless.

How His Leadership Style Compares to Traditional Political Figures

Comparing Trump’s leadership approach to that of traditional political figures highlights his distinctiveness. While conventional politicians typically prioritize compromise, diplomacy, and stability, Trump often embraces a direct, transactional, and results-driven style. For example, former U.S. presidents, such as Ronald Reagan or Barack Obama, often emphasized unifying rhetoric and sought to maintain cordial relationships across the aisle. Trump, however, is more inclined to draw stark contrasts, creating clear divisions between allies and opponents.

His leadership style resembles that of a CEO or an entrepreneur more than that of a politician, reflecting his private sector background. Whereas traditional leaders in government might rely heavily on advisors, committees, and institutional frameworks to guide decisions, Trump tends to prioritize personal intuition and loyalty. This approach aligns with his emphasis on loyalty and his preference for surrounding himself with close allies rather than career politicians or institutional experts.

While some view this as a refreshing departure from “politics as usual,” it has also invited criticism. Detractors argue that Trump’s disregard for established norms and his reluctance to work within traditional channels create instability and undermine institutional trust. Yet, for his supporters, this approach is precisely what makes him appealing—they view him as a disruptor, someone who is willing to challenge the status quo and make significant changes where others might proceed with caution.

Conclusion

Trump’s leadership style is a product of his unique personality, background, and beliefs. His bold, unorthodox, and assertive approach to leadership is both a strength and a source of contention. By embracing a direct and often combative style, he has energized a base of supporters who value his “outsider” persona and his willingness to defy norms. At the same time, his approach has highlighted the tension between business-oriented and political styles of leadership, sparking debates about what qualities are essential in a public servant versus a business executive.

Let's move on to the next section of our reading, which delves into the psychological analysis of Donald Trump's personality traits and their impact on his leadership style. This section explores how Trump's extroversion, openness, and plasticity have contributed to his success and appeal, as well as the controversies surrounding his unorthodox approach to policy-making.

Section 3: Personality Traits – Extroversion, Openness, and Plasticity

Donald Trump’s unique personality has played a central role in shaping his public life, business success, and political career. According to Dr. Jordan Peterson, Trump’s personality is marked by significant levels of extroversion and openness, which together contribute to his adaptability and remarkable ability to reinvent himself. These traits are not only apparent in his approach to leadership but also in his response to challenges, his media presence, and his enduring appeal. This section explores these defining traits in depth and introduces the concept of “plasticity,” which describes Trump’s capacity for change and growth—a crucial factor in his ability to thrive in the unpredictable arenas of business and politics.

Key Personality Traits: Extroversion and Openness

Extroversion

Trump’s extroversion is one of his most visible and influential traits. Extroverted individuals tend to be energetic, assertive, and sociable, finding stimulation in interactions with others. Trump’s extroversion manifests in his comfort with the spotlight, his energetic engagement with crowds, and his bold communication style. This trait has been essential to his success in various fields, as it allows him to confidently navigate high-stakes environments, engage in public speaking, and connect with diverse audiences.

Extroversion also contributes to Trump’s resilience under pressure. Unlike more introverted leaders who may seek time alone to recharge, Trump appears energized by public appearances and interactions. His frequent rallies, press conferences, and use of social media illustrate his preference for active engagement over introspection or detachment. This extroverted nature not only makes him highly visible but also creates a perception of strength and approachability, which resonates with his base. Supporters often view him as a “man of the people,” a quality that is rooted in his genuine comfort with public life.

Openness

In addition to extroversion, Trump exhibits high levels of openness—a trait associated with creativity, curiosity, and a willingness to explore new ideas and experiences. Openness is often linked to innovation and a readiness to challenge conventional thinking. For Trump, openness translates into an unconventional approach to both business and politics. His career spans multiple industries, from real estate and entertainment to politics, demonstrating a remarkable willingness to venture into new fields without fear of failure or public scrutiny.

Openness also drives Trump’s ability to adopt new strategies and take risks that others might avoid. This trait is evident in his reality television ventures, where he effectively turned “The Apprentice” into a cultural phenomenon, as well as in his decision to enter the political arena as a complete outsider. Rather than following a traditional path into politics, he leveraged his background and celebrity status to connect with voters in unexpected ways, capturing public attention by promising to disrupt “business as usual” in Washington.

Trump’s openness to experience allows him to adapt to rapidly changing circumstances and to think outside the box when addressing issues. In politics, this has led to policy decisions that depart from conventional norms, from rethinking trade agreements to engaging directly with foreign adversaries. While his openness has been a source of innovation, it has also been polarizing, as it sometimes leads to decisions that appear impulsive or unorthodox compared to those of more traditionally minded politicians.

Plasticity: The Capacity to Change and Reinvent

Dr. Peterson emphasizes the concept of “plasticity” in Trump’s personality, which refers to his capacity to change, grow, and reinvent himself over time. Plasticity combines elements of extroversion and openness, enabling an individual to remain flexible, resilient, and responsive to new challenges. For Trump, plasticity is evident in his ability to adapt his image and strategies to suit different roles and industries. He has successfully shifted from being a real estate mogul to a television personality and, ultimately, to a political figure, each time modifying his approach to fit the demands of the role.

This adaptability has been critical to Trump’s success, as it allows him to adjust to shifting landscapes and maintain relevance. In business, he has rebranded himself multiple times, with each reinvention bringing him renewed public interest and opportunities. For example, during economic downturns, he has often found ways to reposition his brand, whether by shifting focus to new ventures or by capitalizing on his status as a media personality.

In politics, Trump’s plasticity has allowed him to pivot from one narrative to another, depending on the audience and circumstances. He presents himself as a populist and outsider, yet he also appeals to business leaders and conservative voters by championing free-market principles. This ability to shape-shift and align with various groups demonstrates his skill in adapting his message to suit different audiences, making him a complex and, at times, polarizing figure.

The Role of Plasticity in His Political Career

Trump’s plasticity became particularly relevant during his presidency, as he navigated the complexities of government and public scrutiny. Unlike many politicians who rely on carefully crafted personas, Trump’s personality is dynamic and less constrained by the need for consistency. He often shifts his rhetoric and positions, depending on the context, a strategy that some view as adaptable while others perceive it as inconsistent. His supporters, however, often interpret this adaptability as a sign of pragmatism, arguing that it reflects his willingness to do whatever is necessary to achieve his goals.

This flexibility also allows Trump to weather controversies and setbacks in ways that would be challenging for more conventional leaders. When faced with criticism or political opposition, he often shifts the conversation or adopts a new stance, allowing him to remain resilient in the face of adversity. This resilience is one reason he has been able to maintain a strong base of support, as his adaptability enables him to respond to challenges without losing his core identity.

For instance, during his presidency, Trump was criticized for his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead of getting defensive, he shifted the conversation to his administration's efforts to develop vaccines and reopen the economy. This ability to adapt and pivot helped him maintain his core identity as a strong leader and problem-solver, which has been key to his enduring support.

Another example is how Trump has handled controversies surrounding his business dealings and personal finances. When faced with criticism and legal challenges, he has been able to redirect the conversation to his success as a businessman and job creator. This resilience has allowed him to maintain a strong base of support among his fans, who see him as a fighter who can withstand adversity and come out on top.

Overall, Trump's ability to weather controversies and setbacks is a key aspect of his leadership style and appeal. By shifting the conversation, adapting to new challenges, and maintaining his core identity, he has been able to stay resilient in the face of adversity and continue to attract support from his base.

The Psychological Basis of Trump’s Public Appeal

From a psychological standpoint, Trump’s extroversion, openness, and plasticity contribute to his appeal as a larger-than-life figure who defies conventional expectations. His extroverted energy draws people in, making him a charismatic and captivating presence in public settings. His openness attracts those who appreciate his willingness to challenge norms and think differently, while his plasticity reassures supporters that he can handle whatever challenges come his way, adapting as needed to remain effective.

For his supporters, these traits represent qualities of strength, resilience, and boldness—qualities they believe are essential in a leader. For his critics, however, these same traits can be seen as erratic, unpredictable, and even reckless, as his willingness to adapt and change is often interpreted as a lack of consistency or adherence to principles. Nonetheless, his personality traits give Trump a unique profile that stands out in the political landscape, drawing both admiration and criticism.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s personality traits—particularly his extroversion, openness, and plasticity—are central to understanding his public image and approach to leadership. These qualities have allowed him to remain adaptable and resilient, enabling him to navigate different industries and roles with relative ease. His extroversion fuels his energetic engagement with the public, his openness allows for bold and unconventional ideas, and his plasticity provides the flexibility to reinvent himself as needed.

In the next section, we are going to explores how Donald Trump's humor has shaped his public image and impacted the broader political landscape. We'll see how his use of humor has been both a defense mechanism and an offensive strategy, and how it has resonated with his supporters while alienating others. Additionally, we'll compare Trump's humor to that of other political leaders, including those in democratic societies and authoritarian regimes.

Section 4: Humor and Aggression – A Double-Edged Sword

One of the most striking aspects of Donald Trump’s public persona is his use of humor, which often combines sharp wit with a level of aggression that resonates strongly with his supporters but alienates others. Humor, for Trump, serves multiple purposes: it is both a defense mechanism and an offensive strategy. Dr. Jordan Peterson observes that Trump’s “ruthlessly funny” style creates a distinct political brand that uses humor to deflect criticism, engage his base, and, at times, intimidate opponents. This section explores how Trump’s humor works as a double-edged sword, shaping his public image and impacting the broader political landscape. We will also compare Trump’s humor to its use by other political leaders, including those in democratic societies and authoritarian regimes.

Humor as a Shield and Weapon

Humor is a powerful social tool, and Trump has mastered its use to both connect with his supporters and fend off critics. His jokes, often at the expense of his opponents, serve to shift the conversation, deflecting negative attention and reinforcing his status as an outsider unafraid to mock the political establishment. This approach creates a sense of camaraderie with his base, who view his humor as a refreshing departure from the typically serious and formal tone of traditional politicians.

Trump’s humor acts as a shield in several ways. When confronted with criticism or accusations, he frequently turns to humor to redirect focus. By making light of serious issues, he diffuses tension and creates a buffer between himself and the criticism. For example, when facing scrutiny over his policies or decisions, Trump often resorts to quips that both disarm his critics and rally his supporters. This “never back down” style prevents his opponents from gaining the upper hand, as they struggle to land substantial critiques when he sidesteps issues through humor.

At the same time, humor is one of Trump’s most effective weapons. He uses it to target opponents, often reducing them to humorous caricatures that linger in the public consciousness. By branding political adversaries with memorable nicknames or mocking their flaws, he diminishes their authority and credibility. His humor can be ruthless, playing on the insecurities of others or amplifying their weaknesses in ways that resonate with the public. This approach is particularly effective in a media-driven age where sound bites and viral moments define public opinion.

The “Ruthlessly Funny” Style and Its Impact

Dr. Peterson describes Trump’s humor as “ruthlessly funny,” capturing the sharp, sometimes brutal, edge of his style. This approach to humor is strategic, blending entertainment with aggression in a way that engages and excites his audience. Unlike the humor of traditional politicians, which often stays within the bounds of decorum, Trump’s jokes push limits, often provoking strong reactions. His supporters view this as a sign of his authenticity and fearlessness, while critics see it as evidence of a lack of respect for opponents and the democratic process.

This ruthlessness creates a unique dynamic in Trump’s public image. To his followers, his humor is a sign of strength, an ability to “tell it like it is” without concern for offending others. They appreciate his willingness to mock what he sees as hypocrisy or incompetence in the political establishment, interpreting it as a sign of integrity. By exposing the flaws of his rivals through humor, Trump reinforces his position as a disruptor, one who refuses to conform to the usual political rules.

However, this style of humor has its drawbacks. While it solidifies his base, it also alienates potential allies and reinforces negative perceptions among his critics. Many see his jokes as mean-spirited or divisive, contributing to a political culture that is increasingly polarized and hostile. His humor often blurs the line between legitimate critique and personal attack, complicating his relationships with other leaders and impacting diplomatic ties. In some cases, his jokes are perceived as undermining the seriousness of important issues, reducing complex matters to punchlines that trivialize legitimate concerns.

Humor in Political Leadership and Authoritarian Contexts

Humor has long played a role in politics, serving various functions depending on the leader and the context. In democratic societies, humor is typically used to humanize leaders, creating a sense of approachability and relatability. Politicians often employ self-deprecating humor to show humility and connect with voters on a personal level. In contrast, authoritarian leaders may use humor as a tool of control, mocking dissenters or using satire to diminish opposition. By ridiculing rivals, they send a message that challenges to their authority will not be taken seriously or will be met with scorn.

Trump’s humor draws elements from both of these traditions. In some ways, his style resembles that of a populist in a democracy, as he uses humor to engage and entertain his supporters, creating a bond based on shared amusement and camaraderie. However, his aggressive humor also carries shades of authoritarian tactics, as he seeks to delegitimize opponents and undermine critics through ridicule. His approach blends democratic populism with an authoritarian edge, creating a distinct style that reflects both his appeal to the public and his disdain for political opponents.

Comparing Trump’s humor to that of other leaders highlights the unique impact of his approach. In Western democracies, humor is often seen as a tool for bridging gaps and fostering unity, yet Trump’s humor often does the opposite, intensifying divisions and provoking confrontations. This reflects a shift in political culture, where leaders increasingly use humor as a means of solidifying their base rather than appealing to a broad spectrum of voters. By contrast, in authoritarian regimes, leaders use humor as a method of control, often mocking dissent as a way to discourage opposition. While Trump operates within a democratic system, his humor echoes the tactics of authoritarian leaders who use ridicule to maintain dominance over rivals.

Humor as a Reflection of Public Sentiment

Trump’s humor not only reflects his personality but also mirrors the frustrations and desires of his supporters. Many Americans are disillusioned with the political establishment, perceiving it as elitist, out of touch, and overly focused on political correctness. Trump’s humor resonates with this sentiment, as he uses jokes to express dissatisfaction with the “status quo” and to challenge the norms that many see as restrictive. His willingness to mock established figures and institutions speaks to a broader desire for authenticity and freedom from convention.

This resonance with public sentiment is a major factor in Trump’s appeal. His humor provides an outlet for frustrations that many feel but are reluctant to express. By voicing these frustrations in a humorous way, he gives his followers permission to laugh at the political establishment and feel validated in their dissatisfaction. This dynamic reinforces his role as a populist leader who champions the grievances of ordinary people, strengthening his connection with his base while deepening the divide with his detractors.

For instance, he often uses humor to mock the political establishment and the media, making jokes about the "deep state" and the "fake news" media, which resonates with his supporters who feel disillusioned with the political system. He also makes light of serious issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, although this has been criticized by some as being insensitive. Additionally, Trump often uses irony and sarcasm in his humor, poking fun at his opponents and the political establishment, and has been known to use self-deprecation, making jokes about his own hair and weight, which has been seen as a way of showing humility and relatability.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s humor serves as both a shield and a weapon, allowing him to navigate political conflicts while energizing his supporters. His “ruthlessly funny” style is a defining feature of his public image, embodying both his authenticity and his willingness to challenge norms. Through humor, he creates a sense of solidarity with his base, who appreciate his irreverence and rejection of political correctness. However, his humor also has its costs, as it alienates critics, intensifies divisions, and sometimes undermines the seriousness of important issues.

In the following section we're going to examines how Trump's unique blend of rhetoric, personality, and policy promises resonates deeply with working-class Americans. It delves into the elements that contribute to his appeal among working-class citizens, from his tone and language to his stance on issues that impact their daily lives. Dr. Jordan Peterson analyzes Trump's appeal to the working class, noting how his assertiveness, "rough" humor, and perceived authenticity create a sense of shared identity with many Americans in blue-collar professions.

Section 5: The Appeal to the Working Class

One of the most notable aspects of Donald Trump’s political journey has been his ability to resonate deeply with working-class Americans. His connection with this demographic reflects a unique blend of rhetoric, personality, and policy promises that speak directly to their experiences and concerns. Dr. Jordan Peterson has analyzed Trump’s appeal to the working class, noting how his assertiveness, “rough” humor, and perceived authenticity create a sense of shared identity with many Americans in blue-collar professions. This section delves into the elements that contribute to Trump’s appeal among working-class citizens, from his tone and language to his stance on issues that impact their daily lives.

Understanding Trump’s Connection with Working-Class Americans

Trump’s appeal to working-class Americans stems largely from his ability to communicate in a way that feels relatable and unfiltered. Unlike many politicians who adopt polished and often scripted communication styles, Trump’s approach comes across as raw and direct, cutting through what his supporters view as the excessive formality and detachment of traditional politicians. His speeches often use plain language, simple slogans, and memorable phrases that resonate with audiences who may feel left out of the complexities and nuances of “elite” political discourse.

His rhetoric often centers on themes of national pride, job security, and American strength—topics that hit close to home for many working-class individuals. For Americans facing economic hardship or struggling with job insecurity, Trump’s promises to bring back manufacturing jobs, protect American industries, and put “America first” align closely with their aspirations. By emphasizing these issues, Trump taps into a longstanding discontent with globalization and economic policies that many see as harmful to American workers.

Moreover, Trump’s background as a businessman who “understands” the economy contributes to his credibility with this demographic. Many working-class Americans appreciate his portrayal as a successful businessman who knows how to create jobs and navigate financial challenges. Although Trump’s actual wealth and lifestyle are far removed from those of the average worker, his focus on economic concerns makes him appear as someone who “gets it,” addressing the financial struggles that many working-class people face.

How His Rough Humor and Assertiveness Resonate

One of the key components of Trump’s appeal is his use of humor and assertive rhetoric, which both entertain and inspire confidence among his followers. His “rough around the edges” humor, which often includes direct insults or blunt commentary, is seen by many of his supporters as refreshing honesty. This style deviates sharply from the diplomatic language of typical political speech, giving Trump an “outsider” appeal that resonates with those who feel alienated by mainstream politics.

Dr. Peterson observes that Trump’s humor and assertiveness have a way of rallying his base, as they provide an outlet for the frustrations of working-class Americans. Many in this demographic feel dismissed or ignored by elites, and Trump’s willingness to speak bluntly—often addressing topics that other politicians avoid or gloss over—validates these feelings. His jokes and offhand comments about “swamp” politicians, the media, and foreign adversaries tap into a sense of shared grievance, allowing his supporters to feel that he is fighting for their interests against powerful, disconnected elites.

Furthermore, Trump’s assertiveness conveys strength and confidence, qualities that are highly valued by Americans in tough, often dangerous professions. People working in physically demanding or high-risk jobs, such as construction workers, miners, soldiers, and police officers, often admire leaders who demonstrate resilience and boldness. Trump’s style aligns with the mindset of individuals who tackle challenges head-on and value toughness, reinforcing his connection with working-class Americans who identify with these characteristics.

The “Real People” Connection: Soldiers, Police Officers, and Blue-Collar Workers

Trump’s ability to connect with “real people” in challenging jobs, such as soldiers, police officers, and blue-collar workers, is a significant factor in his appeal. These individuals often face high-stress situations, and many feel that their sacrifices are underappreciated by society. Trump’s vocal support for these groups, along with his criticism of policies and social movements that he claims undermine their work, resonates deeply with this demographic.

For instance, Trump frequently expresses strong support for law enforcement, presenting himself as a defender of “law and order.” At a time when police officers face heightened scrutiny and criticism, his stance is appreciated by those who feel their work is unfairly criticized. His speeches and rallies often include statements of gratitude for military service members, law enforcement officers, and first responders, reinforcing his image as a leader who respects and values their contributions. This respect, combined with his assertive tone, appeals to a demographic that views physical and moral strength as essential qualities in a leader.

Additionally, Trump’s willingness to address the concerns of veterans and promise improvements to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has endeared him to many in the military community. His focus on veterans’ healthcare, benefits, and the improvement of VA facilities taps into a long-standing issue within the military community. Veterans and active-duty service members appreciate a leader who recognizes the sacrifices they’ve made and promises tangible improvements to their post-service lives.

Appeals to National Identity and Economic Self-Sufficiency

A major component of Trump’s appeal to working-class Americans is his focus on national identity and economic self-sufficiency. Trump’s “America First” platform emphasizes the need to protect American jobs, industries, and borders, themes that resonate with individuals who may feel vulnerable to the effects of globalization and outsourcing. Working-class Americans, particularly in areas hit hard by deindustrialization, are drawn to Trump’s promise to revive domestic industries and bring back jobs that were lost to overseas competition.

This focus on self-sufficiency is reinforced by Trump’s stance on immigration and trade. Many of his working-class supporters feel that immigration policies and international trade agreements have undermined American job security and wage growth. By calling for stricter immigration controls and renegotiating trade deals, Trump addresses the economic concerns of these individuals. His criticism of companies that relocate factories to other countries and his calls for tariffs on foreign goods align with a desire to protect American jobs, an issue that deeply resonates with blue-collar workers.

Dr. Peterson notes that this connection to national pride and economic sovereignty has a powerful appeal for those who feel left behind by economic change. For many working-class Americans, Trump’s promises to defend their livelihoods and promote American-made products go beyond simple political promises—they reflect a desire for stability and respect for their hard work. This sense of loyalty and protection is especially meaningful to those who feel marginalized by the changing economy.

The Working-Class Divide: Supporters and Critics

While Trump has garnered significant support from working-class Americans, it’s important to acknowledge that his appeal is not universal within this demographic. Working-class individuals are a diverse group, and many remain skeptical of his policies and leadership style. Some see his promises as unfulfilled or view his rhetoric as divisive. For example, while some working-class voters appreciate his strong stance on trade and immigration, others believe that his policies have failed to deliver the economic improvements they hoped for.

Additionally, Trump’s often controversial comments on race and immigration have alienated certain segments of the working class, particularly those in communities that value diversity and inclusion. The working class in urban and multicultural areas may view his rhetoric as a threat to the social cohesion they value, highlighting a divide within the demographic. This internal division underscores the complexity of Trump’s appeal—while his style and policies resonate deeply with some, they are polarizing and off-putting to others.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s appeal to working-class Americans is rooted in his ability to connect on a level that feels personal, authentic, and direct. His assertive humor, focus on national pride, and promises to protect American jobs and industries resonate with individuals who feel underrepresented and undervalued by mainstream politicians. His support for soldiers, police officers, and blue-collar workers reinforces his image as a leader who respects and fights for “real people” facing real challenges.

However, this appeal is not without its complexities. While many in the working class view Trump as a champion of their interests, others see his approach as divisive or disingenuous. This divide reflects the multifaceted nature of the working-class demographic, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of Trump’s appeal.

In the following section, Peterson argues that Trump's empathy for the working class is one of his defining characteristics, albeit one that is easy to miss due to his combative style. Trump's ability to communicate in a way that resonates with "ordinary" people demonstrates an intuitive understanding of their frustrations and priorities. This pragmatic approach to empathy prioritizes practical solutions over emotional connection and is evident in Trump's messaging around trade and domestic industry.

Section 6: Empathy and Narcissism – A Paradox in Personality

Donald Trump’s personality presents an intriguing paradox, one that combines traits of both empathy and narcissism. His ability to resonate with certain demographics, particularly the working class, seems to suggest a level of understanding and empathy for their struggles. Yet, his brash, often unapologetic public persona and apparent focus on self-promotion lead many to view him as a textbook narcissist. Dr. Jordan Peterson’s analysis delves into this tension within Trump’s personality, highlighting the ways in which empathy and agreeableness can coexist—even within someone who often presents a combative, impolite exterior.

The Paradox of Trump’s Empathy and Agreeableness

Empathy, in its simplest form, is the ability to understand and share the feelings of others. Agreeableness, one of the “Big Five” personality traits, involves qualities like compassion, cooperation, and a tendency to avoid conflict. On the surface, Donald Trump’s personality might seem incompatible with these traits. His confrontational style, quickness to criticize opponents, and strong need for attention can overshadow any impression of empathy or agreeableness.

However, as Dr. Peterson observes, there are moments when Trump’s actions reflect a surprising level of empathy, particularly toward the working class. His willingness to address issues like job loss, economic insecurity, and lack of recognition resonates deeply with people who feel marginalized or left behind by political elites. His direct approach—although often blunt—can convey a sense of honesty and concern that some find more genuine than the carefully crafted statements of traditional politicians.

Trump’s empathy may not always appear in the form of soft-spoken compassion, but it does manifest in his ability to understand and advocate for the struggles of certain groups. He frequently acknowledges the challenges faced by “ordinary” Americans, whether they are struggling with job instability, rising living costs, or perceived threats to national security. His rhetoric, aimed at protecting American jobs and industries, suggests a focus on issues that affect working-class lives—issues that might be overlooked by more polished, traditional politicians.

Dr. Peterson’s Insights into Trump’s Empathy for the Working Class

Dr. Peterson argues that Trump’s empathy for the working class is one of his defining characteristics, albeit one that is easy to miss due to his combative style. Trump’s ability to communicate in a way that resonates with “ordinary” people demonstrates an intuitive understanding of their frustrations and priorities. Peterson points out that this kind of empathy, while not always framed in gentle language, can be highly effective, particularly when it involves issues like economic security and personal safety.

Peterson also suggests that Trump’s empathy is more strategic than emotional. Rather than expressing empathy in an overtly warm or affectionate manner, Trump communicates empathy by addressing the concrete, tangible needs of his supporters. He speaks to the concerns that affect their daily lives—promising more jobs, stronger borders, and economic stability. This focus on real-life issues speaks to a certain pragmatic empathy, one that prioritizes practical solutions over emotional connection.

This pragmatic approach to empathy is evident in Trump’s messaging around trade and domestic industry. By promising to renegotiate trade deals and bring back manufacturing jobs, he aligns himself with the concerns of those who feel left out of the benefits of globalization. For many working-class Americans, these promises resonate because they address immediate, real-world concerns, even if Trump’s delivery style is more forceful than comforting.

Narcissistic Tendencies and the Public Persona

Narcissism, often characterized by self-centeredness, a need for admiration, and a lack of sensitivity toward others, is another key element of Trump’s personality. His critics often cite this as a defining feature, pointing to his tendency to boast, self-promote, and deflect blame. Trump’s focus on “winning,” as well as his insistence on being the best or the greatest, has led to perceptions of him as a quintessential narcissist.

However, Dr. Peterson argues that Trump’s narcissistic tendencies don’t necessarily negate his capacity for empathy. Narcissism in public figures is often tempered by a need for validation from their audience. In Trump’s case, his desire for public approval pushes him to address the concerns of his supporters in a way that reinforces their loyalty. This relationship between narcissism and empathy is complex: while Trump’s need for admiration may drive his behavior, it also leads him to prioritize issues that matter to his base. Thus, even his more self-centered tendencies can result in actions that benefit his followers.

Furthermore, Trump’s narcissism can serve as a motivator, pushing him to achieve and maintain power by delivering on promises that resonate with his supporters. His need for success and recognition makes him attentive to the concerns of his audience, as their approval is essential to his self-image. In this way, his narcissism may actually enhance his ability to act empathetically—at least in a way that satisfies his supporters’ expectations.

How Agreeableness Coexists with a Brash and Impolite Exterior

One of the most counterintuitive aspects of Trump’s personality is the coexistence of agreeableness with his often brash and impolite exterior. Agreeableness, in the traditional sense, involves a tendency toward cooperation, kindness, and a desire to avoid conflict. Trump’s public persona appears to conflict with this trait, as he is known for his confrontational style, frequent insults, and lack of concern for political correctness.

However, Peterson suggests that agreeableness in Trump’s case may not manifest in the traditional way. Instead of expressing agreeableness through politeness or conciliation, Trump channels it into a desire to protect and advocate for his supporters. His brand of agreeableness, then, is selective: he directs it toward those he considers “on his side” while remaining unyielding and combative toward those he perceives as adversaries.

This selective agreeableness is visible in Trump’s interactions with his supporters at rallies. His speeches often include positive reinforcement, encouragement, and even affection toward his followers, whom he frequently praises as “patriots” and “hardworking Americans.” In these settings, he displays warmth and camaraderie, creating a sense of loyalty and solidarity. This version of agreeableness is less about universal kindness and more about loyalty and group cohesion—qualities that, for his supporters, compensate for his lack of traditional politeness.

The Strategic Balance Between Empathy and Narcissism

The interplay between empathy and narcissism in Trump’s personality creates a unique balance, one that is central to his effectiveness as a public figure. His empathy, though often pragmatic and selective, allows him to connect with his base on a level that feels personal and genuine. At the same time, his narcissistic tendencies fuel his drive to maintain this connection, as his self-image depends on the support and admiration of his followers.

Peterson’s analysis highlights how this balance enables Trump to appeal to people who might otherwise reject a more overtly narcissistic leader. By framing his ambitions in terms of benefiting the “forgotten” Americans, Trump turns what might be seen as self-centeredness into a focus on advocating for the underrepresented. His self-assured and assertive demeanor reinforces this image, painting him as a leader who is strong enough to fight for those who feel left out of the political process.

The Broader Implications of This Paradox

The paradox of empathy and narcissism in Trump’s personality has significant implications for how we understand public figures and leaders more broadly. While narcissism is often viewed as a negative trait, Dr. Peterson’s analysis suggests that in certain contexts, it can coexist with empathy in ways that enhance a leader’s effectiveness. For Trump, the need for admiration and approval motivates him to address his supporters’ concerns, even if his style is abrasive and unapologetic.

This paradox challenges traditional notions of empathy, agreeableness, and leadership. It suggests that empathy does not always require gentleness or humility, nor does narcissism necessarily preclude a genuine desire to help others. For many of Trump’s supporters, this combination is precisely what makes him effective: he is seen as both tough and compassionate, as someone who will fight for their interests while refusing to back down in the face of opposition.

Conclusion

Donald Trump’s personality defies simple categorization, as it encompasses both seemingly contradictory traits of empathy and narcissism. His ability to empathize with the working class, combined with his narcissistic drive for validation, creates a complex and effective public persona. While he may not display empathy in the traditional sense, his focus on concrete, relatable issues and his selective agreeableness allow him to forge a powerful connection with his base.

In the next section, we will explore Trump’s approach to media and communication, examining how he leverages his unique personality traits to influence public perception and maintain his influence in the ever-evolving media landscape. Dr. Peterson’s insights will shed light on Trump’s media strategy, offering a deeper understanding of his impact on modern political discourse.

[jakeperalta]

the thing is I already know that men and society at large hate women. I know that young men in particular increasingly skew right and towards misogyny (I've read the articles, although all I really need to do is spend any time on any part of the internet to see the evidence). but then every so often something like this happens where it still somehow surprises me. like my god.. they really hate us this much.

[trans-emet-selch]

I have always found it interesting that the WoL refers to Emet-Selch as not Emet-Selch but as Hades.

Sure, the journal entry is named Emet-Selch. But the first thing written there is that his true name was Hades. You also see this when you describe him to the Minstrel for his extreme trial.

Additionally, the description of the trial alludes to this as well. As when we talk about those we have faced in the First. We talk and refer to him as Hades. Which is also written similarly to the journal. Both of which were described/written by the WoL.

"Hearken unto a requiem for a hero fallen. A man who lived a thousand thousand of our lives clinging desperately to faint hope, never shirking his sworn duty to his long-lost brethren. A man who stood proud and did avow his true name on the threshold of the battle that would see him fall to his rival—the light to quench his shadow. Borrowing liberally from the funereal rites of the Night's Blessed, the minstreling wanderer weaves an elegy in that hero's honor—the tragic-yet-triumphant tale of a man and a battle that ne'er shall be forgotten."

You can also see this in the quest dialogue and while we cannot know the exact words the WoL used (as it is your own intrepretation of it) it is still clear that the WoL didn't refer to Emet-Selch as Emet-Selch they call him Hades.

For the WoL, this is about honoring the man who held steadfast to his ideas. Who fought for his loved ones just as much as the WoL does. Not the Ascian Emet-Selch. To honor and remember Hades as he once lived.

There is however, the matter brought up by the Minstrel: Why did Emet-Selch reveal his name to the Wol?

We do have a simple meta reason why: Hades is a recurring Summon across the Final Fantasy games. Using the name Hades is just natural to do so.

However, let's look at this from an in-lore perspective as well. For which we can look to what he says and speculate.

In the quest, Return to Eulmore, before leaving to Wright you can question Emet-Selch over the information he gives in the cutscene before. Revealing to us that Emet-Selch, along with the rest of the ascians encountered, is merely a title inherited. Their true names are hidden to take up the name and position of their seat.

You can, upon hearing this, ask him for his true name:

His reply to this is rather interesting:

There are a couple of things to note from his response. Firstly, he doesn't outright dismiss telling you his name, only says that eventually he'll reveal it. Of course, this hinges upon you living through your trials in putting down the Lightwardens and containing the light within, or simply dying from other matters.

But this would be disappointing for him. This dialogue ties into what he proposes to you later in The View From Above. To stand with him as allies. He doesn't propose this to the rest of the Scions, just the WoL. He dangles these threads because he wants them to reach back as Azem would. The WoL dying would be disappointing, and he would have to begin his search anew for Azem's soul.

We don't know if Emet-Selch has encountered Azem's shards before the WoL. Maybe he had or maybe he didn't. But it wouldn't change the fact that the WoL's death would have him searching again.

Even as he hurls insults upon the WoL for once more disappointing him, that is still Azem's soul in there. After all, his invitation to seek him out in the Tempest allows you to die with dignity. Everything he ever does is not let himself be alone and reach out to an old friend.

He wants someone else to remember it all. Who is more worthy of remembering it all than Azem?

Emet-Selch is a man of many masks. It is true, and his emotions are ever cloaked, but there are ever glimpses of them throughout Shadowbringers. Especially if it's Azem's soul prodding at him to reveal the layers underneath.

So in his final confrontation, when either the WoL dies or he, wouldn't it not be disappointing to leave the question of who the man underneath is all truly is? Perhaps even this even the last-ditch attempt to have the bearer of Azem's soul remember before either of you dies.

Emet-Selch yearns for his old friend to come back to him and remember. Just as much as he wishes shoulder the burden of remembering all of those that lived before. The WoL bears that last wish and remembers the man who fought for it all underneath as Hades. A man who once lived.

[teratomatica]

you always land on all fours

[deathricedrawn]

i'm ready to try

[breadandlottery]

[justafewberries]

highlights of violent peeta moments/kills since y'all seem to think being physically violent makes you worthy of being a victor:

He kills the girl from District 8

He's allied with the careers and took a beating at the cornucopia, leading me to believe some of those 11 kills at the cornucopia were his too.

The career alliance was developed DURING the game according to Haymitch, meaning he likely had to prove himself at the cornucopia or die, ergo he likely did kill quite a few people.

He's handy with a knife- even by career standards

He was going to kill again to defend Katniss and only lowered his spear when he saw it was her after the tracker jacker scene

He fends off Cato after getting stung FOUR times by tracker jackers (more than katniss was), takes a sword to the thigh, right next to a major artery, and STILL manages to outrun Cato, camouflage himself and hide.

He kills Foxface (which wasn't violent per se, but this adds to his list. It’s the same way Lucy Gray kills: poison. Rat poison, snakes, berries. It all goes down the same.)

Peeta wrestles Cato on top of the cornucopia with a freshly slashed leg and still manages to end up in only a headlock

It's Peeta's idea to shoot Cato's hand, which he marks with a "X" in his own blood

He volunteers, you know, like a career in the 75th games

He helps to fend off the horde of monkeys with the knife he's skilled with, close range combat vs. long range of katniss's arrows

Peeta kills Brutus, one of the favorites to win the 75th games, likely while trying to defend Chaff (Wonder if this was for Haymitch's sake?)

He launches a man trying to pin him to the ground down the block with just his legs, including the prosthetic at this point.

[razables]

echoes

create/destroy | corruption

[pepperpixel]

“no one’s out to get you,

every one doesn’t care,

no one can recall you’re name,

cause you’re not even there.”

More of them!! Mostly angel cuz they’re fun to draw.. and I wanted to experiment w drawing them more in my style for the 2nd n 3rd pics!

[ckret2]

I might tweak some details later (jewelry? take the ribbon off the bow?) but I've about got a Scalene design I like. The lipstick is really the centerpiece of the design. Now let's infodump! With more art!

🔺 Notice her lines are a a little curvy. It's not for artistic effect. She's got a Fictional Polygon Physical Disorder that makes her bendier than she should be—meaning, among other things, sides that curve and flex.

🔺 It's also the kind of condition with symptoms that are romanticized by people who don't grok that it's a debilitating medical condition. Sides that curve and flex? How exotic! This went to her head in the wrong ways.

🔺 Bill was born with the same condition. You know how squishy and blobby he was as a baby? Thaaat's genetic! He was a lot squishier than most babies! And, consequently, more adorable.

🔺Scalene dreamed of being a famous super model. Was actually a teen beauty queen at mid-tier beauty pageants. She thinks it's always somebody else's fault she wasn't more successful.

🔺 She took Bill to his first baby beauty pageant the day he was born. He did, in fact, have a Best Baby Ever award presented to him by the mayor, but to be fair he was only competing against like 6 other babies and who's going to withhold a trophy from a newborn on his birthday? Anyway the 6-12 month group and 12-24 month groups also each had a Best Baby Ever award.

🔺 This was an absolutely bonkers thing for Scalene to do.

🔺 What's that small scrunkly thing doing at a pageant, he can't even see color yet.

🔺 Their fictional squishy medical condition doesn't just accidentally make shapes cute. It's the kind of condition that affects just about all parts of the body: sides won't stay straight, poor muscle tone resulting in instability & weakness, poor motor coordination & clumsiness, back aches & pains (well, triangles don't have "backs." side aches?), easily dislocated joints, and increasingly skewed sides with age. Just about everyone in Scalene's family is born equilateral and ends up extremely scalene after young adulthood. The rest of her family have normal relationships with their condition, she's the only one who's weird about it

🔺 She was very rough on her body in pursuit of pageantry success, but her physical symptoms & associated chronic pain got a lot worse due to having a kid; she had to retire from pageantry for good. She doesn't blame Bill for this at all. Out loud, to his face. (If she hadn't been so rough on herself in pageants, having a kid probably wouldn't have impacted her health this much. She doesn't consider this.)

🔺 She's weirdly intent on seeing Bill become the success she wasn't. He's her little golden child, he deserves to be seen as the greatest! He'll show them how great he is for mommy, won't he? He won't let mommy down, will he? When he's very young, she takes him to child pageants—he'll appreciate the lessons they taught him when he's older—and this lasts until he finds out he can get out of it by pyrokinetically setting the stage on fire.

🔺 She jokes ("jokes") that she didn't realize that when she was having a kid, she was firing herself from the pageant circuit so she could hire & train her own replacement. These jokes had no long-term impact on Bill at all!!!

(Compare/contrast: how we're told Stan's "You watch the movie, you scare the girl, the girl snuggles up next to you, next thing you know you gotta raise a kid, your life falls apart" is repeating something he heard his dad say.)

🔺 Did you know that squeaky baby shoes are sometimes medical devices? Squeakers help children with poor muscle tone and delayed motor skills learn how to walk correctly: it makes them want to walk on their heels instead of their toes so they can hear the squeak. Did you know sometimes oversized squeaky baby shoes are worn by young kids who need ankle braces? Did you know that kids with poor motor coordination can take a longer time to learn complicated motor skills like tying shoelaces rather than using shoes with velcro straps? It sure is interesting that baby Bill's most defining visual feature is oversized squeaky sneakers with velcro straps and that he kept wearing velcro shoes until he was 16!

🔺 As a baby, Bill's angles were technically supposed to be equilateral,* but thanks to his inherited condition, his angles were so loose his top corner practically formed a right angle. Not good: the closer a triangle creeps to being obtuse, the more likely he'll have muscle strain and medical issues from his organs being squished out of place by his own exoskeleton.

(*supposed to be equilateral: but after receiving treatment, they discovered his angles were still 60º, 60º, and 60.1º, which is mathematically impossible for a triangle... on a euclidean plane. But on a non-euclidean 3D plane, such as in spherical geometry, a triangle's angles can add up to more than 180º... and it's this slight 3D flex to Bill's body that lets him see up into the third dimension.)

🔺 For his first few years of life he actually had a hypotenuse, until physical therapy and side braces helped him improve his muscle tone. Sometimes he still reflexively refers to his base as his hypotenuse. It's fine, sweetie, it's nothing to be embarrassed about, mommy had a hypotenuse too. Don't tell anyone.

🔺 Scalene took baby Billy to a lot of doctors as a kid, just like how she was taken to a lot of doctors! Doctor for his side braces, doctor for his physical therapy, doctor for his shoes... doctor for his eye when he started talking about seeing white glitter at the edge of his vision. Scalene didn't have that symptom, but the eye doc said their condition does occasionally come with visual problems—blurred vision, lazy eye, visual field defects... It sounds like Bill's main field of vision is unobstructed, but if the visual snow he's getting in his peripheral vision is distracting him and confusing his little toddler mind into thinking it's something real, they can give him a medication that'll narrow his field of view. From the sound of it, he's not seeing anything important at the edge of his vision, anyway.

And she only wants what's best for her golden child.

🔺 Scalene's "bow" is actually a medical device: sort of like a medical corset, it helps tug and press her anatomy into place to reduce pain. Bill started wearing one preventatively—if he can keep everything in place when he's young, it'll take longer for his angles to skew when he's older. Like wearing a retainer when you get your braces out.

🔺 He has a cane for the same reason—he doesn't need it NOW when he's young, but he might as well keep it on hand, by age 35 he'll probably want to stand more often than float and when he's standing he'll probably want the extra support! Even if he doesn't need it by 35, he will eventually!!

🔺 Bill doesn't medically need a bow tie in the third dimension either; but he adapted it to help tie his 3D exoskeleton on.

🔺 A trillion years later, Bill suspects that his mutation to see the third dimension came, at least in part, from his mom's medical condition. Except, she didn't have that vision. Nobody else with the condition on her side of the family had that vision. It's not a known symptom of the condition. His dad had stuff going on with his eye too, did he get it from his dad's side? A mix of both? Just a standalone random mutation? He doesn't know; and with the rest of his species dead, there's no way for him to find out.

But back to Scalene!

🔺 She's not quite red, she's rose gold. However she doesn't like it. She thinks it's a sort of pinkish brown and very dull. She uses makeup to make herself look redder. Note how bright red her sides are: in a species where only your edges are visible, body paint is the most common form of makeup+fashion. She's pleased her baby came out gold-gold, it's much cuter. Bill knows she's rose gold, but he only saw her with her makeup off when she was tired or sick; he remembers her painted red.

🔺 She adores her Billy; but she somewhat sees him as an extension of her will. She thinks he's just perfect and will tell anyone who asks; but she also demands he be perfect and is furious when he isn't. She'll protect him from ANY perceived external threat; but she'll tough love him into being the kind of success she thinks he should be. He learns early that when he screws up, he can often redirect his mother's anger by pointing his finger and saying it's someone else's fault, and she'll bring the wrath of heaven down on them. Woe to the teacher who gives Bill an F on a test.

🔺 I'm on a quest to write Bill as a foil to the entire cast of Gravity Falls, and that extends to writing his family as a foil to the entire cast's families. Scalene's a blend of Pacifica's mom and Caryn: beautiful, proud of her beauty, afraid of losing her youth, self-aggrandizing, quick to lie about her & her family's (false/exaggerated) accomplishments—and very aware of the fact that you can say anything about woo-woo mystical matters and nobody can prove you wrong.

🔺 So she takes it great when they figure out Bill is, like, legit psychic. And by "takes it great" I mean "starts a cult."

There's what I've got on Scalene. Fortunately, I got to keep all my pre-TBOB headcanons about Bill's mom, I only had to change her shape & color. I already had medical trauma baked right into the family!

(Preemptive disclaimer before I get any "but she doesn't look 2D" comments: we all understand that the baby Bill picture we see in the book is a psychically-generated 3D approximation of Bill's 2D Euclidean form, right? And that drawing a 3D baby Bill design alongside rigidly 2D parent designs would make it look like even in the second dimension Bill already had a 3D body, right? So, if we're drawing a 3D baby Bill and want to convey that they looked similar to him, we have to draw his parents in a similar art style, right? Okay, great.)

[rrr-mmmm]

Louis and Claudia as "Shelter" by Peter Macon

[zirconpetals]

Somebody make some kind of smart observation about their relationship or Spock's character arc based on this

[sunlight-shunlight]

i always bounced off the "she was a halla and he was a wolf 🥺" or "she's sooo mild and innocent and he's a hardened stoic morally grey immortal" version of solavellan, bc firstly that is generically heterosexual in a way that i find silly. and secondly the timeline is just. SO wild.

from lavellan's perspective they're like "hm this guy saved my life from the anchor! cool. a very knowledgeable and skilled mage. he's a bit annoying about the dalish but i do like our talks. we've been through some pretty scary life or death situations together. he seems kind of mysterious or depressed at times, i wonder what's going on there. but we have been flirting a bit... maybe i can go for 1 (one) kiss and see what happens 🤔"

this is very normal. this isn't notably "✨such a pure and gentle soul that has won the heart of the ancient bloody-handed trickster✨" behaviour, they're actually acting in a fairly regular way as someone who has a crush.

but by the point lavellan makes any move at all, from solas' perspective. he is already Dying Internally. he is Pining. when lavellan shoots their shot, he's already reached the level of "meeting you has changed my whole life and worldview, i don't know how to handle it," and presumably has restrained himself from saying anything to them only through pure stoicism and willpower. millennia of insurgency and political experience, all bent onto the task of Acting Normal Around Lavellan. he's halfway about to blurt out a love confession if they reciprocate the feelings at all.

his entire plan for however many eons was to NOT get overly attached to any single person and risk his trolley problem calculations and schemes for them, but within like 4-6 months of hanging out with this random, somewhat curious mortal, he's considering telling them everything and/or giving up the plan entirely. truly cringe fail.

[gnomewithalaptop]

Thinking about Tim and Cassie as narrative reflections of each other -- about how they both started out as normal kids with no obligation to their mentors, good kids who just wanted to help, and how gradually, bit by bit, that choice they made as thirteen-year-olds lowkey ruined any chance they had for a normal life

[ghostlakan]

the night window

[hamletthedane]

Love that Oppenheimer is a deeply disturbing horror movie about a man forced to accept that he is, in a person, the representative manifestation of mankind’s evil in committing one of the greatest horrors of human history - LITERALLY acting as the modern Prometheus, tormented by his sins for the remainder of time. Knowing that he will never be pitied and his actions will forever be utterly unforgivable because the blood of genocide and the potential of total human annihilation will eternally drip from his hands.

But also the simultaneous indictment by the film that to blame a single person for the Manhattan Project is to refuse to accept your own capacity for great evil if the ends ever seem to justify the means, and the culpability of every member of a species that lets itself create something so unspeakably terrible.

Hate that twitter’s take on such a nuanced and brilliantly handled examination of those issues is “movie bad because protagonist not evil enough.”