(via T-shirt chiné avec l'œuvre « Maître Rhinocéros marche sur le monde » de l'artiste AnEmptyLake)
0 notes
L'éléphanteau sans trompe qui avait raillé la #girafe née sans tâche a été exclue définitivement du #zoo a annoncé aujourd'hui #GabrielAttal
L'article sur www.fucknews.fr
0 notes
Le chat aux pattes noires - le félin le plus meurtrier du monde
Nouvel article publié sur https://www.2tout2rien.fr/le-chat-aux-pattes-noires-le-felin-le-plus-meurtrier-du-monde/
Le chat aux pattes noires - le félin le plus meurtrier du monde
0 notes
Ismael Savane by Isaac Calpe for Vogue Mexico March 2024
128 notes
·
View notes
The thing is that Louis is ALWAYS going to choose from Midnight Memories forward for his 1D covers because that’s when he really took ownership of his songwriting and steering the band’s sound.
Give me a Louis and Steve Durham arranged version of something like Strong or Fireproof over something from the first two albums ANYDAY.
133 notes
·
View notes
https://x.com/savan_kotecha/status/1786822536069517665?s=46&t=8oGXlY2gNSWLDR_INsMZpg god he’s so pathetic
I can't stand him. He's such a fake POS. But she's pathetic as well. That whole article is basically her rejecting all criticism of her book because it's obviously misogyny. Her article is the same bullshit excuse Olivia gave for any criticism of her work or her behavior. Misogyny.
I will give her credit for being frustrated that the movie seems to have removed any substance her book may have had and has turned into a feel-good rom-com, complete with a happy ending. That must be annoying as fuck.
However, she has the nerve to say that people who label her work as "romance" or "fanfiction" are being reductive because her book is so much more. It's a story "about ageism, sexism, the double standard, motherhood, female friendship, agency, and the dark side of celebrity".
She goes on to say that "Labeling it as “fluff” or “fanfiction”—particularly when done by those who have not read it—is both reductive and dismissive. And this is not something that happens to male authors." Meanwhile, most fic is written by women. And I'd hazard a guess that most romance is as well. So, it's okay to dismiss those forms of art created by women as "fluff", but not her very serious deep novel? 🙄 I wonder if she's seriously delved into fic before criticizing it as a reductive form of art. I highly doubt it.
And this is my favorite part:
"But assuming a novel with a fictional celebrity in a relationship must be based on an existing celebrity—in this case, the internet has decided, Harry Styles—is unimaginative at best and sexist at worst."
AS IF SHE DIDN'T TELL THE WHOLE WORLD that her character was inspired by him when the book came out. AS IF she didn't use that as a way to excite her readers. AS IF THE ACTOR IN THE FILM DOESN'T FULLY COPY Harry's mannerisms and wardrobe choices at times. AS IF Anne Hathaway didn't steal a line out of Olivia's playbook and focus her early promo on this film's sex scenes being about "a woman's pleasure". AS IF there aren't numerous moments in the film that echo tabloid moments in Harry's life.
Everyone is backtracking now because his fans pitched a fit. It's all so idiotic. And I can't wait for this movie to go away.
You can read her full article here.
62 notes
·
View notes