#Sean O'Reilly

[travelingtostories]

F I N I S H E D : Pixies by Sean O'Reilly.

[applesaucesims]

[🎵]

As autumn was slowly moving towards its end, Spooky Day came around and, despite Emma being heavily pregnant at this point, the McGregor's decided to host a party for friends and family. They had bought lots of different sweets and decorated the house with pumpkins, some of them they had even carved themselves.

The party guests, apart from their close friends, were mainly the younger generation of Emma's extended family, although Charlotte was also there, being the youngest of the aunts and uncles and wanting to use the opportunity to dress up and visit her favourite niece.

Everyone had come in different exciting costumes, Sean and Darrel even had costumes crafted by their mother, though the masks came off as soon as sweets were involved. Knowing her sons well, Christine had painted their faces, too, as a backup. Emma and Niall had been lucky to find some promotional costumes of the new Snow White film at the studio, which they obviously had to make use of.

In the end, it was a fun night for all. Even though Kenneth and Harriet seemed to pretend it was not, to not come across as childish, they ended up leaving with smiles on their faces, just like everyone else.

[TRANSCRIPT]

Niall: *whistling*

Niall: "Happy Spooky Day, Snow White!"

Emma: "You too, my prince!"

...

Sean & Darrel: *giggling*

Franklin: "Niall, where're the other drinks?"

Niall: "Check the dining room!"

Judy: "Come on up and let's dance!"

...

*lively spooky jazz* / *laughing and singing*

*lively spooky jazz*

Harriet & Kenneth: *teenage grumpiness*

[edgarallantypo]

I found an incorrect quote generator and put the Irish Lads names in and the results are amazing 😂

[vintagewarhol]

[thingsmk1120sayz]

[luuuna-rambles]

Did me an animation :)

[thackerycinx]

[collarchronicles]

Trinity College of Workin’

Unravel the mystery in 'The Transformation of Sean O'Reilly'. What begins as an ordinary day at Trinity College takes an intriguing twist with a simple discovery. Join us on a captivating journey through Dublin, where destiny, identity, and magic intertwine. How much can one moment change a life? Read the story to find out.

[devilscreekballad]

Below is a bit from the test-area for horsename shenanigans...

MC: $fname '$nick' $name Horse: $hnamelong, also known as $hname / $hname Doublename: $doublenames (counts for first and last name), Doubled: $doubled (counts for nickname) 1 = sean or O'brian 2 = tommy, thomas or burke 3 = quinn/o'reilly 4 = josie or Mckee 5 = meadows 6 = giles 7 = finn 8 = prescott 9 = Blayne 10 = Reuben 'weirdhorse' = $weirdhorse 1 = names match, but not all three are a variety of Charlie or Mulligan 2 = Charlie and the horse share a name, but not with the MC 3 = MC and Horse share a name, but neither is similar to Charlie or Mulligan 6 = all three names match as either 'Charlie' or 'Mulligan' 20 = Not sorted out yet 21 = horse and mc share a first name with an npc 22 = horse and mc share a nickname with an npc 23 = horse and mc share a last name with an npc 24 = horse and an npc share a first name 25 = horse and and npc share a last name 'horsewithaname' = $horsewithaname 1 = first name and horse name are varities of 'charlie' 2 = same first name for mc and c, surname for horse 3 = mc & charlie 'mulligan', horse 'charlie' 4 = all varieties of 'mulligan' 5 = MC-nick 'charlie', horse 'charlie' 6 = MC-nick 'charlie', horse 'mulligan' 7 = MC-nick 'mulligan', horse 'charlie' 8 = MC-nick 'mulligan', horse 'mulligan' 9 = 'charlie' or 'charles' last, horse 'charlie' 10 = 'charlie' or 'charles' last, horse 'mulligan' 11 = 'charlie' first, horse variety of other 12 = 'mulligan' last, horse variety of other 13 = charlie nick, horse other 14 = mulligan nick, horse other 15 = charlie last, horse other 20 = not sorted out yet

---

Can you believe I AM STILL working on the horse names?

HOW????? this should have been EASY

>:V

[mystic-hysteria]

From oldest to newest ~

All of my married couples from my BaCC :D I have some engaged wlw couples but sadly not yet married *sigh*

Orion and Manuel Uzopelh - Round 2

Gabriel and Ryou Perez-Kimura - Round 2

Leo and Kasia Tschöpel - Round 3

Grover and Adrian Bălan - Round 4

Cassidy and Darwin Vaught - Round 5

Mina and Cyrus Brightley - Round 8

Sean and Fiorella O'Reilly - Round 8

[azspot]

Remember, Fox hires some angry shouters -- Mark Levin, Jeannine Pirro -- but its big prime-time stars are generally people the audience is supposed to read as reasonable. Sean Hannity doesn't yell. Tucker Carlson persuaded his audience that he was just asking questions, and was genuinely upset because his very deep research told him that the answers weren't what the authorities said they were. Bill O'Reilly is best known to lefties for shouty clips, but he delivered most of his monologues in a soft baritone voice, which was meant to suggest that when he did get angry, it was in response to something really awful.

No More Mister Nice Blog

[farcillesbian]

watching this movie cause it has a really intriguing synopsis and it's already... interesting

"After her mother's death, mediocre chef Amanda Shelton (Sarah Michelle Gellar) is having trouble attracting customers to her family's restaurant. While shopping for ingredients, she is given a magical crab by mysterious Gene O'Reilly (Christopher Durang). Afterward, Amanda's dishes suddenly become excellent, inducing strong emotional reactions in everyone who eats them. Tom Bartlett (Sean Patrick Flanery), who is preparing to open his own eatery, tries her cooking and falls in love."

[seanoreillyband]

Top of Your Mountain - Sean O'Reilly (livestream highlight)

[worldofwardcraft]

It ain't over yet, mate.

April 24, 2023

Many people were disappointed when, just as the trial was starting, Australian immigrant Rupert Murdoch (pictured above telling Mr. Bond he expects him to die) settled the defamation case brought against him and his Fox News Corporation by the Dominion voting machine company. The $878.5 million Murdoch agreed to pay isn't enough, people said. And, true, it's a mere fraction of Fox's net income of $7-8 billion a year. But it's not nothing.

Some also feel let down because there wasn't a proceeding where Murdoch, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and other Fox miscreants would testify about their willful lies concerning the 2020 election. But since the judge previously banned recording devices from the courtroom, we wouldn't have heard their testimony, anyway.

Moreover, we already know what they were going to say. Their depositions, along with their emails and other internal company correspondence, have all been made public by Dominion's lawyers. The whole world now knows what kind of lowlife Murdoch is and what false and malicious propaganda Fox News spews out.

Murdoch's troubles, however, are far from over. He and his company must still face the defamation suit against them brought by Smartmatic USA, another voting tech firm, that's still wending its way through the court system. That suit, which additionally names host Maria Bartiromo, Jeanine Pirro and former host Lou Dobbs, seeks to take an even bigger bite out of Fox — $2.7 billion! And with the evidence already turned up by Dominion, they just might get it. Said their attorney Erik Connolley last week, “Dominion’s litigation exposed some of the misconduct and damage caused by Fox’s disinformation campaign. Smartmatic will expose the rest."

But wait, there's more. A bunch of Fox Corp shareholders not named Murdoch are demanding records, such as board minutes, emails and texts, which may contain evidence that Fox directors and executives were derelict in allowing the network to perpetuate Trump's election lies. And, according to Reuters, one shareholder has already filed suit against Fox chairman Murdoch, his son and CEO Lachlan, plus three other directors, alleging they breached their duties to the company.

When Rupert Murdoch wants to make something unpleasant go away, he usually just opens up the checkbook. In 2017, he (or rather his insurance) paid $90 million to settle sexual harassment accusations against Bill O'Reilly. And he shelled out $139 million over a London phone hacking incident in 2013. But no amount of money can erase the reputational damage this scandal is only beginning to cost him.