#Sino-Soviet

[jovialbasementbouquetblr]

Russian Perspective: PRC Foreign Policy 1949 - 1976

Foreign policy of the People’s Republic of China from 1949 to 1976 Внешняя политика Китайской Народной Республики в 1949 – 1976 гг. by Andrei Olegovich Vinogradov – leading researcher of the Institute of the Far East, Russian Academy of Sciences, candidate of historical sciences. The Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences is preparing to publish the 8th volume of the…

[psitrend]

Cool Sino Soviet Propaganda Images

New Post has been published on https://china-underground.com/2012/01/07/cool-sino-soviet-propaganda-images/

Cool Sino Soviet Propaganda Images

Sino Soviet Propaganda

During the fifties, sino-soviet relations were essentially benign, even if the ideological roots of the Sino-Soviet split originated in the 1940s and started just after the Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance (1950).

By 1961, the Communist Party of China formally denounced the Soviet variety of Communism as a product of “The Revisionist Traitor Group of Soviet Leadership”. However, before to split, both the propaganda departments stimulated feelings of friendship and cooperation in their respective populations.

Related articles: History of Chinese Space Program, Propaganda Images of the Cultural Revolution

Sino Soviet Propaganda Images

Related

41 propaganda posters for Chinese children

14 Cultural Revolution Propaganda Postcards

Chinese Navy Drills Cultural Revolution Propaganda Images

Source:http://www.cjdby.net/

More: Italian Fascist Propaganda Posters

#CCCP, #ChinaSoviet, #ChineseCommunism, #ChineseRussianPropaganda, #CinaSovietica, #Communism, #Images, #Mao, #Propaganda, #PropagandaImages, #RussianCommunismDesign, #SinoSoviet, #SovietUnion, #SovietUnionDesign

[quotesfromall]

There was, perhaps, an additional tie of major proportions between our young Chinese radicals and the Russian Anarchists, that of political environment, Russia and China were the two sick giants of the early twentieth century. That a bond of sympathy should exist between the dissident intellectuals of these two societies was natural. The receptivity of the Paris group to the voices of Russian radicals—indeed, the general influence of Russian revolutionaries upon their Asian counterparts—must be related to this fact.

G. T. Yu, The Chinese Anarchist Movement

[antynous]

What good comrades they are

[mapsontheweb]

Communist world divided by the Sino-Soviet Split as of 1978.

[ihavetoomuchhomeworkforthis]

the guys from the accidentally-gay sino-soviet communist propaganda posters look a lot like Tom Paris and Harry Kim from Voyager

(sorry for the photo dump, I wasn't sure which ones to use)

[captain-price-unofficially]

Chinese soldiers playing around with a broken SSh-40 helmet during the Battle of Zhenbao (Damansky) Islands, 1969 [681x439]

[septictankie]

The Sino-Soviet split centered on Mao refusing to accept de-Stalinization in the USSR. As a result, he launched the Great Leap Forward without the help of Soviet expertise, thinking the Chinese masses would fuel rapid industrialization. Instead, Chinese workers toiled day and night to produce steel that turned out to be worthless. Local officials also over-reported their crop yields, resulting in entire harvests being turned over to the state, causing the largest famine in history.

[revindicatedbyhistory]

my thing with maoism is a lot of maoist parties have ended up just as reformists as the ml ones they split off from which like yeah i wont pretend like the ml ones are much better but if your ideology is meant to avoid the classic pitfalls of mlism well

[erinsintra]

had a dream today and i distinctly remember gazing at a world map that looked like this:

[carbone14]

Fusils antichars japonais de 20 mm Type 97 récupérés par les soviétiques lors des combats de Khalkhin Gol en 1939.

[jovialbasementbouquetblr]

2020: Deteriorating Sino-Soviet Relations and Chinese Intelligence

The All-Seeing Eye of Beijing by Dmitry Vedeneev. Historian at Lugansk [PhD in History, retired from the Security Service of Ukraine] Chinese secret service officers monitor the border with the Soviet Union The winding down of intelligence cooperation with the Soviet Union was no accident. In its relations with Moscow and the West, the Chinese leadership has always taken a flexible and…

[quotesfromall]

Apart from the economic privileges and benefits, the bosses command political privileges and power. They control state power, dominating the party, the government and the army. They rule the people and are not restrained by them. They can make use of the funds in the treasury and utilise resources and facilities of the country without the people’s supervision. They can prosecute, put innocent people in jail, initiate murders and massacres.They join into gangs, protecting one another, monopolise public opinion, hide the truth, generate false impressions, promote the personal cult, and suppress criticisms. In the case of Chang Chun-chiao, Yao Wan-yuan and Wang Hung-wen, when they were in control of the Shanghai Revolutionary Committee, they resorted to the rule of terror. Chang directed his special agents to arrest any person at will

Lee Yu See, Three Essays on the new Mandarins

[ignitingthesky]

a little preview into my wip ...

[travazap]

Imagine getting paid to write an “analysis” like this. Imagine having the historical knowledge of a newborn child.

[if-you-fan-a-fire]

“Faced with continued Western inertia [about the Japanese invasion of Manchuria] and the need on the diplomatic level to appease the Japanese, Comintern launched a mass-based anti-war campaign matching the Soviet state’s array of nonaggression pacts stitched together by the new people’s commissar Maxim Litvinov at Narkomindel. Comintern resolved at its political committee meeting on 27 April 1932 that “the further growth of the danger of war and intervention against the Soviet Union” had “not met with the necessary determination … The successes thus far of anti-war work are still completely inadequate.” There was as yet no “real mass movement”. 

It was therefore agreed to hold an international anti-war congress on 28 July during an anti-imperialist armaments week “on the widest basis”. A small subcommittee set up to supervise the project, including Willi Münzenberg and a representative from the West European Bureau in Berlin, was to be chaired by KPD leader Ernst Thälmann or his representative. The agenda would focus on the war in China, intervention against the USSR and world war. As the deadline approached, the congress was moved to a three-day event in Berlin in August. Münzenberg was to act as secretary to the committee and the Hungarian Lajos Magyar was added to its tightly restricted list of members. The stipulation made was that the resolutions of the congress must not be “purely Communist but appear independent”; on the other hand, they should focus on the Japanese problem. Nothing confused the Communist rank and file more than the fact that direct collaboration against fascism with the Socialist International and its branches was forbidden as heresy, yet they were supposed to open their arms to these same enemies alongside sundry liberal pacifists at an “independent” congress, in the name of defending the Soviet Union and fighting for peace. But, as one Comintern official pointed out, “Of course, there is nothing bad in succeeding, through some means or other, in deceiving the class enemy. But the trouble is that by such manoeuvres the enemy is not outwitted and one may cause considerable bewilderment within one’s own ranks.” The congress eventually convened in Amsterdam on 27–29 August, with 2,200 delegates from twenty-seven countries.” - Jonathan Haslam, The Spectre of War: International Communism and the Origins of World War II. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2021. p. 105-107.