#What is a Super App?- How it is Created and Benefits of Super app
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
I'm probably going to piss some people off with this, but.
The use of AI and machine learning for harmful purposes is absolutely unacceptable.
But that isn't an innate part of what it does.
Apps or sites using AI to generate playlists or reading lists or a list of recipes based on a prompt you enter: absolutely fantastic, super helpful, so many new things to enjoy, takes jobs from no-one.
Apps or sites that use a biased algorithm (which is AI) which is not controllable by users or able to be turned off by them, to push some content and suppress others to maximize engagement and create compulsive behavior in users: unethical, bad, capitalism issue, human issue.
People employing genAI to create images for personal, non-profit use and amusement who would not have paid someone for the same service: neutral, (potential copyright and ethics issue if used for profit, which would be a human issue).
People incorporating genAI as part of their artistic process, where the medium of genAI is itself is a deliberate part of the artist's technique: valid, interesting.
Companies employing genAI to do the work of a graphic designer, and websites using genAI to replace the cost of stock photos: bad, shitty, no, capitalist and ethical human issue.
People attacking small artists who use it with death threats and unbelievable vitriol: bad, don't do that.
AI used for spell check and grammar assistance: really great.
AI employed by eBay sellers to cut down on the time it takes to make listings: good, very helpful, but might be a bad idea as it does make mistakes and that can cost them money, which would be a technical issue.
AI used to generate fake product photos: deceptive, lazy, bad, human ethical issue.
AI used to identify plagiarism: neutral; could be really helpful but the parameters are defined by unrealistic standards and not interrogated by those who employ it. Human ethical issue.
AI used to analyze data and draw up complex models allowing detection of things like cancer cells: good; humans doing this work take much longer, this gives results much faster and allows faster intervention, saving lives.
AI used to audit medical or criminal records and gatekeep coverage or profile people: straight-up evil. Societal issue, human ethical issue.
AI used to organize and classify your photos so you don't have to spend all that time doing it: helpful, good.
AI used to profile people or surveil people: bad and wrong. Societal issue, human issue, ethical issue.
I'm not going to cover the astonishingly bad misinformation that has been thrown out there about genAI, or break down thought distortions, or go into the dark side of copyright law, or dive into exactly how it uses the data it is fed to produce a result, or explain how it does have many valid uses in the arts if you have any imagination and curiosity, and I'm not holding anyone's hand and trying to walk them out of all the ableism and regurgitated capitalist arguments and the glorification of labor and suffering.
I just want to point out: you use machine learning (AI) all the time, you benefit from it all the time. You could probably identify many more examples that you use every day. Knee-jerk panicked hate reflects ignorance, not sound principles.
You don't have beef with AI, you have beef with human beings, how they train it, and how they use it. You have beef with capitalism and thoughtlessness. And so do I. I will ruthlessly mock or decry misuse or bad use of it. But there is literally nothing inherently bad in the technology.
I am aware of and hate its misuse just as much as you do. Possibly more, considering that I am aware of some pretty heinous ways it's being used that a lot of people are not. (APPRISS, which is with zero competition for the title the most evil use of machine learning I have ever seen, and which is probably being used on you right now.)
You need to stop and actually think about why people do bad things with it instead of falling for the red herring and going after the technology (as well as the weakest human target you can find) every time you see those two letters together.
You cannot protect yourself and other people against its misuse if you cannot separate that misuse against its neutral or helpful uses, or if you cannot even identify what AI and machine learning are.
370 notes
·
View notes
Note
hello 👋🏼
first loving the twiyor 😌
second I have a tech question I was hoping you might be able and willing to answer: are the 'we send you a link to your email to log in instead of using your password' actually more secure or are businesses just being mean to me personally?
hope your day is kind 😊
Ok so Authentication (going to call it auth going forward) is a very large topic and there is some baseline info I want to convey before answering you question.
First, auth breaks down into 3 methods. Confirming what someone knows, confirming what someone has, confirming what someone is.
What you know: this is the traditional password method, do you remember your password you made for us? Do you remember your username? great you can get in if you know those. Stealing these creds is very straight forward, you either guess until you are right or you steal them from where someone has them stored/written down. This is why you should NEVER store your password in a browser and use a password manager instead. I would rather see people write passwords on post-it notes then store them in Google Chrome or Edge. Seriously, it is incredibly easy to steal passwords from Chrome.
What you have: have ever been asked to put an MFA pin into a phone app? that's this method, they are putting predictable generated numbers on your phone that you can then turn around and use to prove you are in physical possession of your phone. This is much more difficult to steal and usually requires physically accessing a phone or infecting it in some fashion to steal the generation algorithm. PS: If a site uses a text message instead of an app to send a pin that is less secure because SIM duplicating is easier then both the above methods for theft (i dont know the details on how to sim dup but I know no good security team takes sms pins seriously)
What you are: This is stuff like Apple's face id, windows hello, finger scan. Anything that is unique to your physical body that can be scanned to confirm who you are. This is either incredibly difficult or super easy to break depending on how the program is written. for example Face ID had an issue where it could not differentiate between particular ethnicities, also someone (the police) can just hold your phone up to force the unlock. This is usually a good method to use in conjunction with one of the others to make Auth more difficult.
So which one is better? Well each one has its pros and cons which means the most secure method is using more then one. This is called Multi Factor Authentication or MFA for short.
So lets go back to your question, is getting a login link more secure then say remembering a password. Well how secure is access to your email? if your email just requires a username and password to get into, then it is the same security level.
If you have your email setup with MFA where you need to password and pin into it then it is probably more secure then some random sites username password pair.
Also we need to ask questions about the links themselves, do you get the same link each time or is a new one created each request? How are they generated? how long until a link expires? is the link email sent via TLS? Which version of TLS? How are they stored or Are they stored? Is link generation predictable, if I had enough info could i just make my own links for any user?
Honestly I think the biggest benefit of this auth method happens on the website side and less the end user side. This requires less development to create, also they do not need to figure out how to store and keep your passwords, and if they get hacked there are no passwords to be stolen since they literally don't use them. Having passwords stolen is when law enforcement needs to get involved (Law enforcement needs to be contacted in the event any Personally Identifiable Information or PII is stolen). So if they do not use passwords that is one less PII they have in their possession.
Overall passwords are shit and anyone trying to make an effort to not use passwords or to not allow just passwords is at least making an effort to have a better security posture. But if it is actually more secure really depends, passwordless is new territory for a lot of people so its going to have growing pains.
hopefully this answers your question! if you want more clarification let me know.
Oh and Spy Family is life

64 notes
·
View notes
Text
On March 27th, Sahil Lavingia walked into the Secretary of War Suite, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, to attend an all-hands meeting of the Department of Government Efficiency. Lavingia had been a DOGE employee for two weeks, part of a small team embedded at the Department of Veterans Affairs. So far, it had been an unexpectedly isolating experience. Lavingia communicated over the messaging app Signal with another member of the V.A.’s DOGE team, but there didn’t seem to be a Signal channel where he could interact with the rest of DOGE. Instead, Lavingia would watch Elon Musk, who led the initiative, engage with his allies on X. Lavingia told me, “You’d see where the dolphins were swimming—like, now we’re looking at D.E.I. contracts—and so you’d swim there, too.”
Before coming to Washington, Lavingia lived in New York, where he worked at Gumroad, an e-commerce site that he’d founded more than a decade earlier. He wasn’t really a MAGA guy, but he had always thought it would be interesting to work in government, and he admired Musk. In October, at a tech meetup at the New York offices of the venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, Lavingia talked with someone who later introduced him to a DOGEstaffer. The staffer put him in touch with a DOGE engineer, who connected him with a DOGE recruiter. The calls didn’t last much longer than five minutes. “All the questions were about ‘When can you move to D.C.?’ ” Lavingia said. Eventually, Lavingia told me, he talked to Steve Davis, the president of Musk’s Boring Company, who asked if Lavingia could code. Yes, Lavingia said. A few weeks later, he got a text: a job had opened up at the V.A. “I felt like, O.K., finally, that’s some information,” Lavingia said. He started in mid-March, making an hourly wage of about thirteen dollars.
President Donald Trump formally created DOGE by executive order on his first day in office, rebranding what had been the United States Digital Service, a kind of internal tech consultancy for the federal government. Musk’s allies quickly staffed it: Davis, who had helped Musk overhaul Twitter, effectively became C.O.O., and Chris Young, a Republican political operative who had led Musk’s super PAC, became a senior adviser. On February 2nd, Wired identified six young computer engineers, all in their late teens or early twenties, who were working for DOGE. The young coders, collectively dubbed the “DOGE kids,” had set up shop at the Office of Personnel Management and at the General Services Administration, where, according to Politico, some of them appeared to be living, having furnished four rooms with IKEA beds. That cinched the cultural image. DOGE was the tech industry’s outpost in government, the department that would move fast and break things.
Initially, it was hard to know how seriously to take the new venture, whose name derived from a meme coin. A senior figure at a conservative think tank predicted to me that DOGE would yield nothing more than a government report that would get stuffed away in a drawer. But DOGE staffers were soon identifying contracts to cancel and employees to let go. On January 28th, the Office of Personnel Management sent most federal employees an e-mail titled “Fork in the Road,” which warned of involuntary downsizing to come and offered them the chance to resign with eight months of pay and benefits. (Musk had sent Twitter employees an e-mail with nearly the same subject shortly after he bought the social-media company, which he rebranded as X.) Those who stayed in their jobs were soon required to document, at the end of each week, five things that they had worked on. A series of lawsuits accumulated in DOGE’s wake, but its actions seemed to be producing results. At the end of March, the Times estimated that the federal government had potentially been cut by twelve per cent.
Lavingia and other members of the DOGE team at the V.A. had prepared a list of accomplishments to present at the all-hands meeting. There were about fifty people in the room at the Secretary of War Suite, a surprisingly small number, Lavingia thought, if this was all of DOGE. When Musk walked in, he asked attendees to share their recent victories, and pontificated about how broken the government was. “It was this very surreal scene,” Lavingia said. He tried to engage Musk in a conversation about a project, but “everyone looked at me like I was weird, like, ‘Why are you trying to get feedback from your boss?’ ” At one point, someone asked how many I.T. workers there were at the I.R.S. It turned out to be more than seven thousand. (The agency has a total of around a hundred thousand employees.) A member of DOGE’s I.R.S. team said that he thought the tax agency needed an “exorcist.” ��Elon was, like, ‘Wait, seriously?’ ” Lavingia recalled. After a few hours, Lavingia left, disappointed. “It’s almost like this is one of the things you get for working at DOGE,” he said. “You get to hang out with Elon once in a while.”
Lavingia had already grown skeptical of the effort. At the V.A., he’d initially planned to update what he’d been told was an outmoded and fragmented human-resources system, but it seemed to be working just fine. “DOGE never had an information flow that was, like, ‘Hey, Elon wants us to do this,’ ” Lavingia said. “You’re asked to give a lot, but you don’t get any access to information.” In April, he returned to New York, working remotely on improving the V.A.’s internal chatbot, VA GPT. In early May, he gave an interview that was published in Fast Company, in which he said of the government, “It’s not as inefficient as I was expecting, to be honest. I was hoping for more easy wins.” Not long after that, his access to the V.A. systems was cut off; he was fired.
Later that month, Musk announced that he, too, was leaving DOGE, after a run in which he had impressively stretched the definition of what a “special adviser” to the President could do. In Trump’s White House, with its long red ties and compulsory praise circles, Musk wore novelty T-shirts and baseball caps, and attended meetings with his four-year old son, X, whom Trump pronounced “a high-I.Q. individual.” He installed a Starlink satellite system on the White House roof, and sold Trump a red Tesla on the White House lawn. Trump obligingly climbed into the driver’s seat and assessed the car’s interior. “Everything’s computer,” the President observed.
At Musk’s sendoff in the Oval Office, Trump presented him with an oversized White House key and said that his work on DOGE had “been without comparison in modern history.” But the relationship between the two men, always transactional, had turned into a bad deal for both of them. DOGE had achieved far fewer savings than Musk had anticipated, leaving Trump backing a budget bill that would add trillions to the deficit. Musk’s work for Trump, meanwhile, had alienated liberals and centrists, tanking Tesla’s sales and stock price. In the Oval Office, Musk had a black eye, which he said he’d got after his son hit him in the face. A reporter asked him about a recent Times story alleging that he had used ketamine and other drugs extensively on the campaign trail. Musk said, “Let’s move on.”
Within days, Trump announced that he was withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman, Musk’s business associate, to run NASA, after “a thorough review of prior associations.” Musk called the Republican budget bill a “disgusting abomination,” and later started a poll on X asking if it was time to start a new political party. Trump seemed to take this personally, posting that the easiest way to save money in his budget bill would be to “terminate” the “Billions and Billions of Dollars” in government subsidies that Musk’s companies received. “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ ” the President wrote. “I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!” Musk responded, “Such an obvious lie. So sad.”
For a few hours on June 5th, the President and the world’s richest man went back and forth, until the fight landed on the subject of many rabid internet disputes—the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. “Time to drop the really big bomb,” Musk wrote. “@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!” (Trump addressed the claim, telling NBC that he was “not at all friendly” with Epstein.)
At that point, many of the most experienced and talented government workers had left their jobs. Those who remained were often forced to pare back the mission and the scope of their work. Jacob Leibenluft, a senior Biden official, told me, “What DOGE has done, what the Administration has done, is cause a remarkable exodus of talent—of people who have built years and years of knowledge that is critical to the government functioning and who would, under normal circumstances, pass that knowledge on to the next generation of civil servants.”
Lavingia thought that the rupture between Musk and Trump had probably marooned many of the remaining DOGE employees, too, some of whom are still embedded in agencies throughout the federal government. It was also possible, Lavingia told me, that DOGE’s strength and its weakness had the same source. He’d seen from the inside that DOGE had no real internal structure. “At the end of the day,” he said, “DOGE is just Elon.”
Dawn on the Potomac River: rowers, joggers, a quickening column of jets descending toward the runways at Reagan National. Culs-de-sac empty; park-and-ride lots fill; the Beltway clogs hellishly. The federal government is everywhere. It is downtown, in the marble buildings near the White House, a sort of nineteenth-century visual trick to lend the appearance of Greco-Roman permanence to what remains a somewhat tenuous political project. But it is also in the Baltimore suburb of Woodlawn, where ten thousand people work at the Social Security Administration’s headquarters; on the brick campus of the National Institutes of Health, in Bethesda; and in the sprawl of the defense contractors out toward Dulles. This is not the political D.C., but the projects are vast. I recently asked a former senior official at the S.S.A. if she’d been worried when Trump won. “Not really,” she said. “My focus was on the solvency crisis.”
Conservatives tend to inveigh against the federal apparatus in Washington; liberals mostly defend it. But the operations of government reflect both Republican and Democratic ambitions. Paul Light, a scholar of public service at N.Y.U.’s Wagner School, has estimated that federal contractors outnumber civil servants by two to one. Elaine Kamarck, of the Brookings Institution, has found that the majority of federal employees now work in security-related fields—thirty-six per cent of them at the Department of Defense alone. For the most part, the U.S. government is organized not to pursue transformative change but to create systems of accountability, and the growth of its expenditures is mostly tied to the sheer scale of what it is keeping tabs on. Federal spending has quintupled since the mid-sixties, adjusting for inflation, to about seven trillion dollars a year. The number of federal workers has basically stayed flat.
People cheat the federal government all the time, in all kinds of ways. Waste exists at every level. In 2011, Boeing was found to have been grossly overcharging the Army for spare helicopter parts; a four-cent metal pin, for example, was billed at $71.01. In 2020, Harvard returned $1.3 million to the Department of Health and Human Services after a public-health professor allegedly overstated how much time she’d spent working on an overseas AIDS-relief grant. Jetson Leder-Luis, a professor at Boston University who studies health-care fraud, told me that, within Medicare and Medicaid, “you get everything from doctors reclassifying procedures to, like, organized crime.”
Leder-Luis likes to cite a study that he and some colleagues conducted on fraudulent billing for dialysis transportation. Medicare has long reimbursed patients too sick to get to dialysis on their own for the cost of ambulance rides. But some unscrupulous actors (Leder-Luis thinks they were mobsters in Philadelphia) realized that it was possible to pay kickbacks to relatively healthy dialysis patients for ambulance rides they didn’t need. Word spread; between 2003 and 2017, Leder-Luis and his colleagues estimated, Medicare spent around five billion dollars on fraudulent ambulance rides. “The F.B.I. has videos of some patients walking in and out of ambulances,” Leder-Luis told me. Dialysis costs make up roughly one per cent of the federal budget. If there was that much fraud in dialysis transportation, Leder-Luis said, imagine how much there is across the entire public sector.
In recent years, wonks in both parties have begun to focus on government inefficiency as a problem. On the center left, the so-called abundance movement calls for a thinning of regulation, to allow the country to more easily create housing and clean energy. On the Trumpist right, the prevailing view is that the government has been overtaken by left-wing ideologues and the only solution is to clear-cut the bureaucracy. Trump spent the campaign promising to purge the federal government of wokeism; his advisers were committed enemies of foreign aid, consumer protection, and the Department of Education. Project 2025, a nine-hundred-page playbook for a conservative President to “dismantle the administrative state,” called the independence of the bureaucracy an “unconstitutional fairy tale.”
The last major campaign to remake the Washington bureaucracy was championed by Vice-President Al Gore, during the Clinton Administration, and developed under the name Reinventing Government. The idea was to bring the public sector up to date with the internet. Kamarck, of the Brookings Institution, was its lead staff member. She leveraged the government’s own expertise: teams of civil servants from other departments were embedded with each agency to streamline and improve its processes. Eventually, the Clinton White House got Congress to pass more than eighty separate laws related to the Reinventing Government initiative. “If you want these changes to be permanent,” Kamarck told me, “the only way to do it is to get them in law.”
DOGE was conceived in something like the opposite fashion. In the spring of 2023, Vivek Ramaswamy, a biotech entrepreneur who had recently launched a bid for the Republican Presidential nomination, invited a New York lawyer named Philip Howard to meet with him at his campaign headquarters in Columbus, Ohio. Since the nineties, Howard has been a guru for business leaders interested in civil-service reform. Ramaswamy wanted to test out some ideas for remaking the federal bureaucracy. As the meeting progressed, Howard had the sense of an “over-intelligent mind spinning into some new theory that creates a new reality that’s not actually connected to reality.” At one point, he recalled, “Vivek was saying, ‘I think the President can really shut down agencies.’ I said, ‘You know, Congress establishes an agency. Do you really think the President can just . . .’ And he said, ‘Oh, yes, yes, it’s fine.’ ” Howard later told one of Ramaswamy’s advisers, “I really don’t think Vivek should go public with this, because it’s just not credible.”
A week after the election, Trump announced in a formal statement that “the Great Elon Musk, working in conjunction with American Patriot Vivek Ramaswamy, will lead the Department of Government Efficiency.” Initially, the two co-chairs seemed poised to occupy separate spheres. Ramaswamy would spearhead a deregulation effort; Musk would focus on cost cutting. In a joint op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, they said that they would work closely with the Office of Management and Budget, which is often described as the federal government’s central nervous system. Before the election, Ramaswamy suggested in an interview that the White House could simply fire all nonpolitical appointees whose Social Security numbers began with an even digit or ended with an odd digit. “Boom, that’s a seventy-five-per-cent reduction,” he said. A month later, Musk was asked how much money DOGE might save taxpayers. “I think we can do at least two trillion,” he said.
But during the transition Ramaswamy and Musk increasingly disagreed about how to make the government more efficient. Ramaswamy, who had apparently come around to the fact that significant cuts would require an act of Congress, began meeting regularly with a small group of legislators. Musk mostly did not attend. A source close to DOGE told me that Musk seemed to regard members of Congress as irrelevant, sometimes referring to them as “N.P.C.s,”—non-player characters—the often mute and nameless figures who populate the backgrounds of video games.
Musk was more interested in cutting spending via the executive branch, and spoke often, according to the source close to DOGE, of a need to “control the computers.” In meetings, Ramaswamy resorted to using metaphors from the tech world to emphasize the importance of deregulation, calling the government’s rules “the matrix” and insisting that DOGE needed to rewrite its source code. Musk was unmoved.
On the eve of the Inauguration, CBS News quoted a White House insider saying, “Vivek has worn out his welcome.” The following day, Ramaswamy left DOGE. Musk, in the faintly stuffy office he inherited in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, reportedly installed a large-screen TV, so that he could play video games; he sometimes slept there. A prominent conservative told me that, online, people were devising ways to influence Musk’s efforts. “You do it by tweeting at Elon and sucking up to him,” he said. “He’s like a prism, and all of social media kind of feeds to him through X.” The trouble, he said, was that “Elon goes on these destiny quests, sometimes looking for something that isn’t there, and then a lot of the government is on a destiny quest.”
Danny Werfel spent much of his career in the federal government. He worked as a policy analyst in the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, as a trial attorney in the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, and as controller at the Office of Management and Budget. Most recently, as Biden’s commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, he was given the rare opportunity to not only run the government but also change it. Congress had pledged eighty billion dollars over ten years to modernize the I.R.S. and bring its collection of taxes up to par with the efforts to evade them. Werfel had expanded the agency’s Large Business and International Division, its enforcement efforts targeting cryptocurrency and high-net-worth individuals, and its investments in artificial intelligence and other technologies. As late as December, 2024, he was still hiring the next generation of civil servants. At the I.R.S.’s annual holiday party, employees were invited to have their photo taken with him; one young man, after the camera clicked, said, ��Thank you, Coach!” He was a new hire, right out of college. A decade earlier, he and Werfel’s son had played in the same northern-Virginia Little League. His father, it turned out, also worked at the I.R.S.
After Trump won, Werfel “wasn’t a hundred per cent sure” that the new Administration would continue the I.R.S.’s modernization efforts, but he tried to engage with it in good faith. In early January, representatives from Trump’s transition team and DOGE met with I.R.S. leaders over Zoom to discuss the handover of power. Werfel’s team had rehearsed the scenario, fine-tuning the language that they planned to use. “We said, ‘Look, we know you have a remit for shrinking government from a people standpoint,’ ” Werfel recalled. “ ‘Do we have that right?’ And they didn’t argue—they agreed. We said, ‘Wouldn’t it be great if you could do that and also improve or maintain the performance of the I.R.S., and its collections?’ And it was, like, ‘O.K., we’re listening.’ ”
Werfel promised the Trump officials that, with a little patience, the I.R.S. could employ fewer federal workers and bring in more revenue. The more effective tax regime that Werfel had been building was not just funded; it was half assembled, like the Death Star. He urged the Administration to give it time to become fully operational. “Think of it as spans across a stream,” Werfel said. “Some of the spans are complete, and you can drive across and automate. Some of them are only halfway complete, so you can’t drive until you finish the span, and some of them you need to build before you begin.” Werfel proposed that the Trump Administration commit to reducing the agency’s personnel in the course of two to four years, and that it “modernize strategically,” to insure that fewer people didn’t mean less revenue or worse service. “That was our pitch,” Werfel said. “It resonated in the moment.”
Hours after being sworn in, Trump signed twenty-six executive orders, restoring the federal death penalty, withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organization, placing a ninety-day pause on foreign aid, and eliminating diversity-equity-and-inclusion programs across the federal government. The executive order establishing DOGE seemed, by comparison, to describe a humble purpose: “to implement the President’s DOGE Agenda, by modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity.” Musk, though a frequent presence in the West Wing, was technically an unpaid adviser.
One area of focus for both Musk and the Administration was eradicating what the Tesla founder called the “woke mind virus.” DOGE soon boasted of cutting more than a billion dollars in D.E.I. contracts. But what, exactly, qualified as a D.E.I. program was open to interpretation. At Social Security headquarters, civil servants were directed to scrub mentions of “diversity” and “equity” from grants, publications, and performance evaluations. Laura Haltzel, who was the associate commissioner for the Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, told me, “It was, like, ‘O.K., this is incredibly inefficient. But we’ll get through it.’ ”
For twenty-five years, Haltzel’s office had operated a research-and-grant program to study the effects and the viability of the Social Security system. Recently, the program had been awarding points to potential grantees if they partnered with institutions that served minority populations, such as historically Black colleges and universities. Because of this, Haltzel told me, she was ordered to shut down the entire program, a request that she viewed as absurd. The program was not focussed on race or gender. It predated the term “D.E.I.” by decades. Haltzel’s boss had petitioned the Office of Management and Budget not to end the initiative altogether, to no avail. “They said, ‘You’ve got to kill it,’ ” Haltzel said.
Similar changes were under way at the I.R.S., where workers were deleting references to “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion” from the service’s employee handbook. A senior I.R.S. official told me, “If you could measure enforcement actions by month, I bet you’d have seen a significant decline in February, because everyone was worrying about what to do about their jobs.” On February 4th, Musk posted a survey on X: “Would you like @DOGE to audit the IRS?” Two weeks later, seven thousand of the agency’s probationary employees—those who’d been hired in the past year or so—were fired. An I.R.S. employee told ProPublica, “It didn’t matter the skill set. If they were under a year, they got cut.” (A federal court later ruled that the firings were unlawful.)
Many of the fired employees had focussed on curbing tax evasion by the country’s wealthiest people. The Yale Budget Lab estimated “very conservatively” that, if DOGE cut half the I.R.S.’s employees, as it had reportedly considered doing, the reduced workforce would cost the government four hundred billion dollars in lost tax revenue, far more than the savings in salaries. Werfel used the analogy of a backpack: if you are filling a backpack, you start with the thing that is most important to you, and then find room for the rest. “They didn’t start by filling the backpack with efficiency, or collections,” Werfel said. “They filled it with job cuts.”
One evening, his wife wondered what had happened to the Little League player from the Christmas party. It turned out that he had been fired that day; he’d been given an hour to vacate the I.R.S. headquarters. His father had walked him out the door.
Every incoming Administration enjoys an unusual power in its first weeks, since the new Cabinet secretaries have not yet been appointed, and thus cannot yet object to changes at their agencies. The White House’s pause on foreign aid raised a particular panic in the Kinshasa office of the United States Agency for International Development. The following weekend, rebels from the paramilitary group M23 took control of the Congolese city of Goma, part of an ongoing conflict that Congolese citizens had long blamed on Western nations, including the U.S. There were rumors of protests in the capital. Meanwhile, dozens of senior U.S.A.I.D. officials had been placed on administrative leave, scrambling the aid workers’ lines of communication to Washington and clouding the question of who was running the agency.
On the morning of Tuesday, January 28th, many U.S.A.I.D. workers had already sent their children to school on a bus and boarded a shuttle to the U.S. Embassy when they received messages telling them that the situation in the capital might no longer be safe. The vehicles turned around, bringing their passengers back home. According to a senior U.S.A.I.D. official in Kinshasa who filed an affidavit in federal court under the pseudonym Marcus Doe, one U.S.A.I.D. worker reported that protesters were setting fires outside his residence. A little later, he requested an evacuation—his front gate had been breached. On social media, Marcus Doe could see videos of looting, and outside his own home he could hear protesters chanting. He and his wife called their kids inside and locked the doors.
Leaders at the Embassy decided to evacuate the staff, but the executive order pausing foreign assistance had made it harder for U.S.A.I.D. personnel to figure out how to fund their travel. Staffers were losing access to the agency’s internal payment system, and officials in the Congo were reluctant to authorize an expenditure, for fear that they would be accused of circumventing the executive order. Employees sought a waiver from U.S.A.I.D.’s acting administrator, a career official named Jason Gray. It was approved, but only after Marcus Doe and others had started evacuating. “I began to feel an intense sense of panic that my government might fully abandon Americans working for U.S.A.I.D. in Kinshasa,” Marcus Doe recalled. He and his colleagues began coördinating with contacts at other foreign-aid organizations. They made it across the river to Brazzaville by boat that night, with an allotment of one carry-on-size bag per person.
The new deputy administrator of U.S.A.I.D. in Washington was Pete Marocco, a former marine who, during the first Trump term, had left his job at U.S.A.I.D. after subordinates filed a thirteen-page memo accusing him of mismanagement and workplace hostility. In a closed-door meeting with lawmakers in March, the Washington Post reported, Marocco called U.S.A.I.D. a “money-laundering scheme” and said that he was examining whether foreign aid was even constitutional. “What we’re seeing right now is Pete’s revenge tour,” a former senior U.S.A.I.D. official recently told NPR. “This is personal.”
Musk shared Marocco’s dim view of foreign assistance. On January 28th, while U.S.A.I.D. staff were fleeing Kinshasa, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, told reporters that DOGE and the O.M.B. had discovered that the Biden Administration planned to purchase fifty million dollars’ worth of condoms for Gaza. Musk posted on X, “Tip of iceberg.” In recent years, U.S.A.I.D., in its efforts to combat H.I.V. and AIDS around the world, has earmarked around seventeen million dollars annually for condoms, including allocations to the province of Gaza in Mozambique; none of the money went to the Palestinian territories. “Some of the things I say will be incorrect and should be corrected,” Musk later said, during an appearance in the Oval Office. “Nobody’s going to bat a thousand.”
By early March, the State Department had announced the termination of more than eighty per cent of U.S.A.I.D. contracts and all but a few hundred of its ten thousand employees. Musk had posted on X that the agency, which was placed under the direct administration of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, was “a viper’s nest of radical-left marxists who hate America.” But it could be difficult to decipher which parts of its mission were progressive and which were conservative. On February 13th, Andrew Natsios, who had been George W. Bush’s U.S.A.I.D. administrator, testified about the cuts before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Natsios had helped lead a faith-based foreign-aid organization, and as the agency’s administrator had increased grants to religious groups. In his testimony, he stressed that many faith-based organizations would close without U.S.A.I.D. funding. Natsios recalled, “I could see the expressions on the Republicans’ faces: ‘Wait a second. No one told us that before. Are you telling me we’re going after our base with these cuts?’ ” He told me that the night before his testimony he’d had dinner with executives from several of the largest Christian N.G.O.s. They were livid. “Ninety per cent of them are on the verge of insolvency,” he said.
The Trump Administration’s campaign against foreign assistance was widespread. On February 28th, Marocco, accompanied by DOGE officials, staged an “emergency board meeting” outside the Inter-American Foundation, which supports civil-society organizations in Latin America and the Caribbean; Marocco announced that he was now the president and C.E.O. and moved to dissolve the organization. On March 5th, officials at the United States African Development Foundation, which invests in small businesses on the continent, managed to keep DOGE officials from coming inside; the next day, the officials returned with U.S. marshals, entered the building, and changed the locks. The following week, DOGE officials arrived at the United States Institute of Peace, an independent nonprofit founded by Congress which works to prevent and resolve violent conflicts around the world. U.S.I.P.’s leadership believed that the institute represented a kind of boundary on the DOGE project—an organization funded by, but not part of, the federal government. (Although most of the institute’s board members are appointed by the President, it was established as an entity separate from the executive branch.) When DOGE officials presented one of U.S.I.P.’s lawyers with a resolution firing the institute’s president, he rejected it as invalid. A few days later, DOGE returned with the police and took over U.S.I.P.’s building. (A federal judge later ruled that DOGE’s actions were unlawful.)
The role DOGE employees played in these closures was not especially technical. But they offered the White House a way to avoid potential bureaucratic obstacles. “The reality is that DOGE has become the instrument for carrying out the will of the President,” a senior foreign-aid official told me. “The game changer for this Administration has been its ability to use this instrument in frankly unlawful ways to carry out its will.”
Before DOGE, U.S.A.I.D. had played a leading role in collecting health data in poorer countries on child and maternal mortality, disease incidents, malnutrition, and access to clean water. Now the ability to gather that information—“the early-warning system for the next pandemic,” as Natsios put it—was gone. A network of aid companies had established a global supply chain for medications, antiretrovirals, and vaccines. It’s now unclear what will happen to the contracts for that system, which cost a few billion dollars a year, paid for by U.S.A.I.D. “There’s no way of doing this stuff without big contractors, because they’re worldwide contracts,” Natsios said. “No N.G.O. can fill that gap.”
DOGE officials were encountering a simple budgetary truth: radically paring back D.E.I. and humanitarian programs didn’t save that much money. U.S.A.I.D.’s spending in the most recent fiscal year had amounted to around forty billion dollars, less than one per cent of the over-all federal budget. But Natsios emphasized that, as a result of the cuts, the U.S. would be confronted with a more challenging world. In the next two years, he expected to see increased mass migration and instability because of famine. He was, he noted, an avowedly anti-Trump Republican. “But the responsibility for this belongs to Musk,” he said. “He is the one getting away with murder.”
By mid-February, small teams of DOGE officials were embedded at most federal agencies. (The original executive order had called for teams of four: one team leader, one engineer, one H.R. specialist, and one attorney.) They were often not a natural fit. A conservative policy analyst who spent time in the Department of Education’s headquarters this winter told me that the DOGE team was largely siloed off, interacting only with a couple of senior staffers, and that its members seemed particularly worried about the possibility of being doxed online. “Your standard political appointee came out of the Heritage Foundation, and has a family and works nine to five and then goes home,” the conservative analyst told me. “The DOGE guys are completely different. They are sleeping in some corner of the building, just looking at their computers. So they’re really seen almost as these exotic animals that can’t be touched.”
Erie Meyer, the chief technologist of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, was at first cautiously optimistic about DOGE. A veteran of the U.S. Digital Service, she had long advocated for more efficiency in government. “I thought, At least the President will have technical people advising him,” Meyer told me. She was a political appointee from the Biden Administration; she had no illusions about her own future. In January, she worked to identify projects that might interest the incoming Administration. Meyer told me, “I basically said, ‘If you want them, here are some easy wins.’ ”
On her last day at the C.F.P.B., Meyer noticed a group of five men wandering around the executive suite; one of them was trying to open the deputy director’s office, but it required a key card. She recognized another from the news—a blond twenty-three-year-old former SpaceX intern named Luke Farritor. Meyer walked out and introduced herself. Were they looking for the printer, she asked, trying to think of an innocuous explanation for jiggling door handles in the executive offices of a government agency. No, a slightly older man, “schlumpy in that D.C. way,” as Meyer put it, told her. It turned out that he was Chris Young, the DOGE leader who’d run Musk’s PAC. He and Meyer made small talk for a minute, and then the group left.
The C.F.P.B., the brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren, was created by Congress in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to protect Americans from financial manipulation. Its databases are filled with details of open investigations, including the names of whistle-blowers and their specific allegations. Meyer became increasingly worried about DOGE’s attempts to access the vast stores of personal and corporate data housed at the C.F.P.B. On January 31st, a longtime Treasury official named David Lebryk, who led the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which sends out payments on behalf of government agencies, resigned after clashing with DOGE officials over their access to the payment system. Lebryk was well regarded across the government, and his resignation reverberated. As a former Social Security official put it, “When it’s, like, ‘Oh, DOGE is trying to get in and Lebryk took a bullet to prevent it,’ that’s pretty concerning, right?”
On February 7th, Musk posted on X, “CFPB RIP.” Later that day, Russell Vought, the director of the O.M.B. and a DOGE ally, sent an e-mail to C.F.P.B. staffers saying that he was assuming control of the agency. Vought, an original architect of Project 2025, has been outspoken about his desire to defund government programs and fire career civil servants. “We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” he said in a private speech in 2023. “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains.”
Vought ordered all C.F.P.B. employees to stop work; eventually, more than a thousand of them were placed on administrative leave. One of the C.F.P.B.’s leaders e-mailed Mark Paoletta, the general counsel at the O.M.B., asking if the agency could at least resume monitoring companies and “was just told no—you have no authority right now.” The union representing most of the agency’s employees sued, winning a preliminary injunction to halt the dismissals. At that point, the C.F.P.B. entered a kind of zombie state, which an enforcement attorney described as “just turning on your computer to stare at it for eight hours with nothing to do.”
The Social Security Administration was under the direction of Michelle King, a career official who had recently been elevated to acting commissioner, when the DOGE representatives began to arrive, in early February. First came Michael Russo, a longtime tech executive who was appointed as the S.S.A.’s chief information officer; then came a coder named Akash Bobba, who had recently graduated from U.C.-Berkeley. According to a senior S.S.A. official, Bobba arrived “sort of spilling over with laptops and cellphones belonging to other agencies he was already working with.” King and her team grew wary when Russo asked for direct access to the main Social Security data files—among them the Death Master File, on which the S.S.A. records each number holder who has died. The senior S.S.A. official said, “It just was never totally clear what Mike wanted access to the Death Master File for.”
Russo and Bobba were set up in an office, working with a small group of anti-fraud officials from the S.S.A., but Bobba had not yet received the credentials necessary to access the S.S.A.’s data files. Steve Davis, incensed, started reaching out to senior S.S.A. officials. “It was ‘S.S.A has got to be the worst agency in the whole government,’ ” the former S.S.A. official said. “ ‘There’s no reason that this hasn’t happened yet. Make it happen.’ ” Russo demanded that Bobba be allowed to visit the S.S.A.’s main data center. “There is absolutely nothing to see there—a loading dock, some security, a bunch of computers,” the former S.S.A. official said. “But their view was they didn’t trust any of the permanent staff at S.S.A., so they needed Akash to get directly in.”
On February 11th, Musk joined Trump in the Oval Office and told reporters that his team had found “crazy things” happening within the Social Security system, including benefit recipients who were a hundred and fifty years old. Employees at the S.S.A. were mystified—virtually no one who had been dead more than a month was receiving benefits, and certainly not a hundred-and-fifty-year-old. S.S.A. officials, unable to reach Musk or Davis directly, tried to explain the situation to Russo, hoping that what they said would percolate up to Musk. “What was weird about that period was everything seemed to be coming through DOGE, rather than from the O.M.B. or from the White House, but it was almost impossible to get any information up the chain,” someone who temporarily led a government agency this winter told me. “They would never let us interface with them directly, since that was sacred. So it was like a really bad game of telephone.”
That Sunday, Musk posted a chart suggesting that there were three hundred and ninety-eight million active Social Security numbers. “Yes, there are FAR more ‘eligible’ social security numbers than there are citizens in the USA,” he wrote. “This might be the biggest fraud in history.” S.S.A. officials were peeved. A week earlier, a few of them had patiently explained to Bobba that the chart contained not the number of people receiving Social Security benefits but, rather, the total number of people without death records. When officials asked Bobba about Musk’s post, he said, “I told him everything you told me. He just tweeted it anyway.”
Meanwhile, the relationship between King and the DOGE team had deteriorated. On February 14th, S.S.A. leadership placed Leland Dudek, a sixteen-year veteran of the S.S.A., who had been working closely with DOGE, on administrative leave. Dudek posted a defiant message on LinkedIn and spent the weekend searching for a new job. Meanwhile, Davis called another S.S.A. official. “I have the agency’s complete executive roster,” the official recalled him saying. “I’d like you to go through it with me and tell me your thoughts on who should be fired.” King resigned, and Dudek received an e-mail from an official at the Office of Personnel Management notifying him that his administrative leave was lifted and he was now in charge of the entire agency.
Dudek did not think that the S.S.A. should fight DOGE directly. “Elections have consequences,” he wrote in an e-mail to Social Security employees. In March, according to a recording obtained by ProPublica, he urged the staff to be patient with the “DOGE kids.” But he was also committed to keeping the agency functional. The DOGE team wanted to lay off the S.S.A.’s probationary workers. In meetings that included representatives from the O.P.M. and the G.S.A., and congressional staffers, Dudek went through the list of potential layoffs: How many were veterans or military spouses or worked in customer-service positions? Surely, Dudek said, President Trump would not want to let those people go. The total number of cuts dwindled from what might have been fifteen hundred to less than two dozen.
Dudek wanted to keep the checks going out and limit the personnel losses. But, in doing so, he was forced to make compromises. In April, a DOGE official named Aram Moghaddassi, an ex-Twitter engineer who was embedded with both the S.S.A. and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, sent Dudek a request to take away the Social Security numbers of sixty-three hundred immigrants who had been allowed to enter the country during the Biden Administration. Doing so would make it impossible for those individuals to work legally, open bank accounts and lines of credit, or access government benefits. In a separate memo, the Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, explained that the cancellations would “prevent suspected terrorists who are here illegally” from having “privileges reserved for those with lawful status.” Dudek determined that the simplest way to make the change would be to add all the names to the Death Master File, a move he soon authorized. The former Social Security official, who by then had left the agency, told me, “This was the one truly totalitarian thing the agency was asked to do.”
In the five months since DOGE officially began its operations, the scale of its projected savings has steadily dwindled. Musk revised his original promise of two trillion dollars to one trillion. In May, reporters from the Financial Times went through the “wall of receipts” that DOGE had been posting online, which now claims a hundred and eighty billion dollars in savings. They concluded that “only a sliver of that figure can be verified.” The Times, which has made a series of similar findings, reported, “The group posted a claim that confused billions with millions, triple-counted the savings from a single contract and claimed credit for canceling contracts that had ended under President George W. Bush.”
DOGE has reportedly cut more than two hundred and eighty thousand government jobs—U.S.A.I.D. and the C.F.P.B. have been effectively eliminated—and the fate of much of the rest of the bureaucracy is now in the hands of federal judges. But even if DOGE’s accounting is taken at face value, the effort has still slashed less than three per cent of the federal budget. Zachary Liscow, a chief economist at the O.M.B. during the Biden Administration, wasn’t especially surprised by the small numbers. The total cost, including pay and benefits, of all civilian personnel across the federal government, Liscow said, is just four per cent of the budget. The entire non-defense discretionary budget amounts to about nine hundred billion dollars—one-seventh of the total. Liscow, who is now a professor at Yale Law School, said cutting government personnel is unlikely to lead to savings, since fewer people helping with oversight often allows the costs of contracts to balloon: “If, in the name of efficiency, they cut a bunch of I.R.S. employees who pay for themselves many times over, it makes you wonder what motivates them.”
The savings that DOGE uncovered were supposed to help pay for tax cuts—one Trump operative even conceived of “DOGE checks,” through which money would be returned to the public. But the Republican budget in Congress would now add three trillion dollars to the national debt. “It’s a lost opportunity,” Howard, the lawyer and conservative regulatory specialist, told me. DOGE “was not focussed on any vision of how to make government more efficient—just on cutting. They didn’t have any vision of duplication, or of how to create more effective operating systems. You can fire the paper pushers, but if the law says you’ve got to push this paper, and there’s no one left to push it, that’s a formula for paralysis.”
Veronique de Rugy, a leading libertarian thinker at the Mercatus Center and one of the thirty-four named authors of Project 2025, also initially supported DOGE. But she eventually grew disillusioned with what she regarded as its almost singular focus on culture-war issues. In March, she wrote, in an essay for Reason, “For all the talk about cutting government waste and fraud, the DOGE-Trump team seems mostly animated by rooting out leftist culture politics and its practitioners in Washington.” She was especially concerned by the ways in which DOGE seemed to be expanding, rather than curtailing, the powers of the executive. “Being a libertarian right now,” she told me, “is like being punched in the face with your own ideas by a drunk teen-ager.”
Even before Musk and Trump’s blowup, some of DOGE’s main lieutenants, including Davis, were quietly exiting. Their departures offered a reminder of the essential imbalance between the bureaucrats’ enduring stake in the structure of government and the fleeting and contingent interest of Musk’s team. After Musk’s departure, Vought, at the O.M.B., became the face of what remained of DOGE, which made a certain amount of sense: without the new-new gloss of tech, the project would revert to a more mundane, institutional form.
What, then, was DOGE? Part of its pitch was that it would infuse government with talent, replacing diversity hires and ineffective workers with more adept ones from the startup industry. The young embeds who moved throughout the government, whom Musk raved about during his Fox News appearances, were an embodiment of this vision. But, in the end, the quickest way for DOGE to cut the government had nothing to do with technology. Lavingia told me that, during his two months at the V.A., he came to the conclusion that there were not actually so many people sitting around doing nothing. “To be honest, it is often worse in the tech industry, where you have venture money and low interest rates,” he said. “It can be pretty inefficient.”
I asked the former S.S.A. official, who had worked closely with several DOGE coders, what he thought of their abilities. “In general, they were all pretty talented for their level of experience,” he said. “If we’d taken them on as junior hires, they would probably have progressed pretty quickly in a hierarchical organization.” But, by design, they existed outside the civil service, with little guidance on what to do and why. “They all seemed pretty desperate for Elon to say that they were doing good,” the former official said. “There was a lot of ‘What does E. want?’ ‘Did you see what E. said?’ ” The former official compared the situation to the science-fiction novel “Ender’s Game,” by Orson Scott Card, in which a team of children who are invited by the military to play an elaborate video game are unknowingly operating actual weapons of war.
A conservative influencer familiar with DOGE made a similar point about Musk, saying that he’d attempted to transfer the partisanship of social media to the weights and measures of the federal government. “It’s true of a lot of people, and it’s definitely true of Elon, that you live on X and your psychology is merged with the cesspool of the modern internet,” the influencer told me. “Going in and deregulating things and cutting costs might have achieved the policy result. But he’s playing a different sport—getting people to hit him really hard and then becoming a savior to everyone who hates those people.” He added, “It’s not that the vitriol from the other side is an unfortunate side effect—it’s actually the point.”
When I spoke with Lavingia, he reflected on what DOGE had actually achieved. It had been blamed for mass firings and contract cancellations across the government, but, in reality, it had played the role of technological adviser to politically appointed agency heads. “There’s a lot of power that comes in that first hundred days,” Lavingia said. “But DOGE and Elon really mostly had soft power—they didn’t have hard power.” The hard power had come from Trump; the soft power depended on Musk’s influence over him. “The premise of DOGE requires Elon and Trump to really be aligned,” Lavingia said. “And it now seems that was kind of for show.”
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
Smart Automation in Stage Lighting & LED Fixtures: A Game-Changer for Live Events
In today’s world of live shows, concerts, weddings, and big corporate events, one thing has become super important: the lighting. But we’re not just talking about ordinary lights anymore. We’re talking about smart lights that can move, change color, follow people, and sync perfectly with music or video—all by themselves. This is called smart automation, and it’s changing the game in stage lighting and LED setups.
Let's have a look at what it is, how it operates, and why so many event professionals are making the transition.
What is Smart Automation in Lighting?
Smart automation refers to employing technology to automatically switch lights on and off rather than having to change them manually. With a single command or click, an entire lighting system can cycle through color change, move in sequence, or respond to audio. These systems can be pre-programmed or even programmed to change live during the event.
So, rather than someone at a lighting desk pushing buttons for every adjustment, the system recognizes what to do and executes it flawlessly each time.

How Does It Work?
To grasp smart lighting, a couple of straightforward tools behind the magic are:
DMX Control: It is similar to the vocabulary that lighting gear speaks to communicate with one another. This helps the lights, controllers, and other gear to coordinate with one another.
Wireless Control: Most smart systems today use Wi-Fi or Bluetooth to communicate. Goodbye, cumbersome long cables everywhere.
Mobile or Remote Access: Lights can be accessed using a tablet or laptop. Some systems even support remote control from another room.
Sensors and AI: Motion sensors can make lights track an individual on stage. Artificial Intelligence can even recommend lighting effects depending on what's happening at the show.
Why Smart Lighting is a Top Choice
There are plenty of reasons that smart lighting is increasing rapidly:
Perfect Timing Every Time
Lights switch on and off exactly when they should—no delay, no error. Whether it's in the middle of a speech, a tune, or a dance, everything unfolds right on schedule.
Improved Creativity
Smart systems enable you to create fantastic scenes. You can achieve mood shifts, glowing effects, moving lights, and a lot more. All this can be achieved with just one touch of a button.
Saves Time and Effort
After programming the lights, they do the work on their own. You don't require a large group to operate them, thus saving lots of time at the time of setting up as well as during the event.
Works from Anywhere
Since it's wireless and remote-capable, technicians can update it in a snap, even when they're not on stage.

Real-Life Examples
You find yourself at a concert. The performer comes out onto the stage. The lights suddenly darken, a spotlight trails the performer, and flashing colored lights caper in the background—all tastefully in time to the rhythm of the song. That's intelligent automation at work.
Or maybe you’re watching a fashion show. As each model walks down the runway, the lights automatically shift to highlight them, while LED screens show matching colors and designs. It’s smooth, stylish, and all automated.
Good for Big Events AND Small Ones
The good news? Intelligent lighting isn't reserved for huge stadium concerts. Even smaller events such as school events, church services, or birthday parties can benefit from this technology. There are easy systems to get that are simple to learn and not expensive at all.
You can begin with a few smart LED lights and a simple controller or app. After getting comfortable, you can expand with more features in the future.
What to Remember Before Getting Started
If you're considering incorporating smart lighting, here are some key points to remember:
Check for Compatibility: Ensure that your lights and control systems are compatible.
Learn the Fundamentals: Simple programming can lead to huge differences.
Build a Solid Network: A stable wireless connection is crucial.
Stay Safe: Lights and trusses weigh or heat up—ensure proper installations.
And also, it's best to purchase your equipment at professional audio stores. They will advise you on what is best and provide you with quality equipment that performs better and lasts longer for your events and even installation and setup services so that buyers don't have to deal with the technicality.
What's Coming Next?
Technology is advancing quickly. Smart lighting's next big thing is interaction systems. These lights can adapt to the crowd's movement, respond to the noise of clapping or cheering, and even adjust to the mood of a space. Some lights can be operated with voice commands or motion detectors.
Artificial Intelligence is also joining the party—there are systems that learn from run-throughs and can adjust the lighting for the next show automatically. Stage lighting in the future is promising and bright.
Before You Go
Intelligent automation of stage lighting and LED light fixtures is more than a bells-and-whistles upgrade—it's an intelligent investment for anyone producing live events. It gets your show to look more professional, conserves time, and permits greater creativity.
Whether you are organizing a concert, wedding, school play, or corporate event, intelligent lighting enables you to provide an unforgettable experience for your audience. With some planning and proper equipment, you can enhance your lighting game to the next level.So if you're organizing your next function or just wanting to upgrade your setup, it's a good time now to look at smart lighting. It's simpler than you might imagine—and it's worth it.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Alternatives to Excel (For Simmers, Storytellers & Roleplayers)
For someone like me who is a control freak and has the memory of a 2 month old baby, it's essential to have a tracker if you play in rotation mode or if you are creating a story. But what if you don't have the Office Pack? Yes, nowadays it's essential for any kind of work, but let's say you don't have it at all and you don't want to spend money on the license of programs that for whatever reason you don't need. No, I'm not suggesting to 🏴☠️it, but free alternatives!
Google Sheets - Practically the program almost identical to Excel, it's free and you can edit your files wherever you are, as long as you log into your Google account with your email on any phone, tablet, computer etch. (Of course, security measures are at your own risk, better not to log into public devices with your Google email, ok? Do it on devices of friends and relatives at most). I'm not linking it because you can find it on the web simply by typing "Google Sheets" or on the PlayStore by typing the same thing (I don't know how it works for Apple devices, if it's the same on their store)
Notion - This is a program that I fell in love with at first sight, much more extensive than Excel and Google Sheets. It allows you to create an infinite number of things, to have simple pages of notes, small personal blog and web sites, "wiki like pages", databases etch. You can even have group projects with friends (you can edit things in real time at the same time) keep everything private or online. It's absolutely free although it has a premium plan that obviously offers some additional benefits. The thing I love about this program is that it's incredibly versatile to use ANYWHERE as long as you use your Google email like Google Sheets. You can use it directly on the web, or download it to your PC, tablet or phone. (Although I recommend you use it mostly on PC and tablet because I assure you that it is hell to manage it from a phone, you need large screens to manage everything). If you want to try a ready-made template, here's a tracker for The Sims 2 that I created!
EXTRA THINGS
Family Gem - A mobile application that allows you to create family trees. There are many on the web to use on PC, but most are not totally free, limited, and uncomfortable to use if you need to check something from your phone (or it's just impossible to do so). At the same time, using mobile apps makes viewing on a PC impossible, but Family Gem does offer the option to export family trees as GEDCOM files that can be imported into any family tree site! And you can also save them on Google Drive, your cellphone or wherever you want. (Oh, I hope they make a web version one day 😭). Yes, I know there are online family tree sites dedicated solely to The Sims, but their services are not stable, and we've already seen it with the closure of PlumTree or whatever it was called. But now you'll ask: yes, but what do I do with a family tree recreated on a cell phone if they already exist in the game? Well...Let's say you're talking to your friends and you don't remember the name of your fifth-generation sim now that you're on your tenth, what do you do, go and log in to your PC just to check? It's convenient to have the family tree on your cell phone! Or maybe you are a Storyteller or a Roleplayer and you don't remember the name of that particular sim, I assure you that it is super essential to have a family tree writen somewhere when you are someone who writes a lot! Oh, also, I prefer it to any other application because it works even offline and it's simple and immediate and I can insert any type of information in it, date, etch. Also, it is simple to manage adoptive families and biological with this app since it allows you to specify it (not all family tree apps allow this).
miMind - A very specific and simple mobile app to create concept/mind maps in the form of diagram graphs. Useful if you have trouble organizing your thoughts or if you need to explain some complicated concepts to friends or people who follow your story. It's a new app, and unlike similiar apps, it's completely free (except for a few small premium options), easy to use and works both on PC and mobile, online and offline. One of the things I like is that it saves the images in high quality! Here is an example of a graph I made that summarizes some of Tybalt Capp's kinship and relationships (for a roleplay). And yes, there are extra characters and the surname is the original one but don't pay attention to it, look at the graph, how tidy it is!
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
What if his desire were granted?

February 24, 2025
To the list of debilitating mental illnesses afflicting Donald Trump — malignant narcissism, paranoid delusions, depraved sociopathy — we must add yet another: boundless megalomania, i.e., Trump's belief that he is much more powerful than he really is. This is most clearly seen in his conviction that he has the unquestioned right to take possession of parts of sovereign nations (such as the Panama Canal and Gaza) or even whole countries (like Greenland).
However, the fantasy he repeats most often is the one about taking over Canada and turning it into a US state. Here he is last December lying as usual on his Truth Social app: "Many Canadians want Canada to become the 51st state. I think it is a great idea." Then, in January: "Together, what a great Nation it would be!!!" Then, during an interview at the Super Bowl: "I think Canada would be much better off being the 51st state because we lose $200 billion a year with Canada." And more lies only days before that:
We pay hundreds of Billions of Dollars to SUBSIDIZE Canada. Why? There is no reason. We don't need anything they have. Harsh but true! Therefore, Canada should become our Cherished 51st State.
But all of Canada's political leaders are solidly against this proposal — from Liberal former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau ("It's never going to happen.") to the ultra-right Conservative Pierre Poilievre ("Canada will never be the 51st state. Period.") And poll after poll show ordinary Canadians also overwhelmingly opposed. A recent Angus Reid analysis found that the percentage of those who said they want Canada to join the US was a meager 4%.
Americans aren't particularly keen on Trump's imperialist visions, either. A Marquette University survey found only 27% of US adults in favor of taking ownership of our northern neighbor.
Joining the US would hardly benefit Canadians. For starters, they'd be forced to give up their single-payer healthcare system that provides universal coverage on the basis of need. Instead, they'd have to suffer under our profit-driven system that yields worse health outcomes with much higher administrative costs.
Moreover, with a population of 40 million, Canada is simply too big to be just a single state — the country's already divided into ten separate provinces (and three territories). Canada's annexation would create at least 20 new US senators (and who knows how many representatives) from states whose voters hate Trump. Which would probably spell the end of the MAGA Party as we know it. Maybe our psychologically impaired president should be careful what he wishes for.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
AI Books Review – Create Super Profitable Ebooks in Any Niche!
Welcome to my AI Books Review, This is a genuine user-based AI Books review where I will discuss the features, upgrades, price, demo, and bonuses how AI Books can benefit you, and my own personal opinion. This is a brand new AI-powered application that helps you create and sell super profitable eBooks, info products, eBook Covers and lead magnets in just 60 seconds.
Everyone is aware that eBooks often fetch higher prices compared to physical books, and their market growth could be significant due to the increasing adoption of eBooks among consumers. This innovative software program leverages the power of artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline the book creation process from start to finish. Whether you’re a seasoned author facing writer’s block, an entrepreneur seeking to establish brand authority, or an educator crafting captivating learning materials, AI Books promises to be your one-stop shop for efficient and high-quality book creation. We’ll also address potential drawbacks like limited creative control and originality concerns. Ultimately, this review aims to equip you with the knowledge needed to decide if AI Books is the right tool to fuel your book creation journey.
AI Books Review: What Is AI Books?
AI Books promises to be a game-changer for aspiring authors. It’s a software program that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline the book creation process. Imagine this: you input keywords or a basic outline, and the AI engine generates text for various sections of your book. This can be a massive time-saver, especially for those struggling to overcome writer’s block or facing tight deadlines.
However, AI Books is more than just a content generator. It offers a drag-and-drop editor for refining the text, a stock library for visual enhancements, and mobile optimization to ensure your book reads flawlessly on any device. This review goes into more detail about its pros and cons, as well as how it stacks up against other AI writing tools.
AI Books Review: Overview
Creator: Ned King
Product: AI Books
Date Of Launch: 2024-Jul-01
Time Of Launch: 10:00 EDT
Front-End Price: $17 (One-time payment)
Official Website: Click Here To Access
Niche: Tools And Software
Support: Effective Response
Discount: Get The Best Discount Right Here!
Recommended: Highly Recommended
Bonuses: Huge Bonuses
Skill Level Required: All Levels
Discount Code: “AIBOOKS5” To Get $5 Off Full Funnel!
Refund: YES, 30 Days Money-Back Guarantee
>> Click Here To Get AI Books Now & Limited Time Access <<
AI Books Review: Features
Create Unlimited st eBooks to in-depth long eBooks as per your marketing needs.
Loaded With 10K+ DFY Ebooks & PLR Articles.
Fully customizable Drag & Drop Ebook cover builder lets you create amazing ebook covers.
Built-in AI Content & Graphics Generator.
Fully Customizable eBook Builder lets you customize ebook templates and create your eBooks in a flash.
Add Your Branding to eBooks.
Specialized Training to Sell Your eBooks on Amazon Kindle, eBooks.com, Smashwords, Google Play Books etc.
Ready-To-Profit Automatic Account Set Up.
Add and manage unlimited chapters to your eBook.
Flipbook Creator plugin to Convert your eBooks into flip books.
Unlimited Stock Media to use in your eBooks promotion and selling.
Add Conversion Boosting Elements, Lead Magnet Inside eBook.
100% Cloud Based Software
Inbuilt Lead Capture Form for Your Website in Addition to Optin Popup.
Training & Tutorial, plus 24 Hours Support
AI Books Review: How Does It Work?
Just 3 Easy Click is All You Need to Create Engaging eBooks
Step #1:
Choose from DFY eBooks & Articles or Create one from Scratch.
Step #2:
Customize your eBook & Design eBook Cover Using Drag & Drop Editor
Step #3:
That’s it! Download your Stunning eBook and use it anywhere you want or sell it.
>> Click Here To Get AI Books Now & Limited Time Access <<
AI Books Review: Can Do For You
World’s Best AI-Based eBook Creator App
Easy Drag & Drop Fully Customizable Templates to Create eBooks in a Flash
Create and Sell eBooks in Every Possible Niche
Built-In AI-Powered Content and Graphic
Generator
No need to write content and design anything.
100% Cloud-Based Tool Hosted On Reliable Server For Seamless Usage on Any Device
No Tech Skills Required, 100% User Friendly.
Turn Any Article into an eBook with ease.
Fully Customizable eBooks Cover Builder to let you create attractive eBook Covers
Add & Manage Unlimited Chapters to your eBooks
Add Conversion Boosting Elements Inside eBooks — like CTA Button, Images, heads & footer, etc.
Free Commercial License Included
Create a Mini eBook or an in-depth long eBook as per your
need.
Full 30-Day Money Back Guarantee!
AI Books Review: Who Should Use It?
Digital Marketer
Entrepreneur
Podcaster
Affiliate Marketer
SEO Expert
Email Marketer
Coaches
Blogger
Social Media Marketer
ECom Store
Owner
Website Owner
Any Other Possible Niche
AI Books Review: OTO’s And Pricing
Add My Bundle Coupon Code “BOOKADMINMAX″ — For $30% Off Any Funnel
Front End Price: AI Books ($17)
OTO 1: AI Books Pro ($27)
OTO 2: AI Books DFY ($47)
OTO 3: AI Books Flipbooker ($47)
OTO 4: AI Books Agency ($47)
OTO 5: AI Books Reseller 100 ($47)
OTO 6: AI Books Reseller Unlimited ($67)
>> Click Here To Get AI Books Now & Limited Time Access <<
AI Books Review: My Special Unique Bonus Bundle
My Special Unique Bonus Bundle will be visible on your access page as an Affiliate Bonus Button on WarriorPlus immediately after purchase.
And before ending my honest AI Books Review, I told you that I would give you my very own unique PFTSES formula for Free.
AI Books Review: Free Bonuses
BONUS #1: Video Training on How to Publish & Sell Your eBook on Amazon Kindle
Amazon is now the biggest and most trusted online marketplace on the internet, so just having your book published on the Kindle site elicits automatic trust. Publishing your ebook to the Amazon Kindle platform is free and will give you a whole new marketplace full of targeted prospects. So, bring your ebooks into the twenty-first century by publishing them in the hottest marketplace available! And make a successful Internet business.
BONUS #2: Kindle eCover Pack
Inside this bonus package, you are about to receive 50 Kindle covers that will help you make a lot of sales online.
BONUS #3: eBook Creation & Promotion Tricks Newbies
Discover How YOU Too Can Create Your Own Collection of In-Demand, Profit-Pulling Info Products In Just Minutes From Now!
BONUS #4: How To Make Money with Kindle
Marketers that aren’t looking into Kindle are sorely missing out on one of the very best means to generate income currently available online. This is the business model that many rely on because it lets us make nearly 100% profit from all our sales.
BONUS #5: Miscellaneous Stock Photos
Inside this bonus is a bundle of high-definition photos that you can use for your own projects freely.
AI Books Review: Money Back Guarantee
And Your Investment is Risk Free with our 100% Money Back Guarantee
You may purchase with confidence because if you have a technical problem that we cannot handle, just open a ticket within 30 days and we will reimburse you everything, down to the last cent. However, we are certain that once you have AI Books, you will not ask for a refund.
>> Click Here To Get AI Books Now & Limited Time Access <<
AI Books Review: Pros and Cons
Pros:
Increased Efficiency: AI can significantly reduce writing time by generating content, outlines, and character profiles.
Overcoming Writer’s Block: Spark ideas, break creative roadblocks, and keep the content flowing even when inspiration dips.
Content Exploration: Experiment with different writing styles and explore new avenues in your writing.
Accessibility for Beginners: The user-friendly interface makes book creation approachable, even for those with limited writing experience.
Cons:
You need to be connected to the internet to use this tool.
In fact, I haven’t found any additional AI Books issues.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s)
Q. What is AI Books?
AI Books is an advanced AI-powered tool designed to assist in the creation, editing, and publishing of books across various genres, providing efficiency and quality.
Q. How does AI Books improve efficiency in book creation?
AI Books automates many aspects of the writing process, significantly reducing the time and effort required to produce high-quality content.
Q. Can AI Books be used for self-publishing?
Yes, AI Books is highly effective for self-publishing, offering tools and features that cater specifically to independent authors.
Q. What are the main limitations of AI Books?
Some limitations include issues with creative originality and difficulties in genre-specific writing, which users should consider before integrating it into their workflow.
Q. How frequently is AI Books updated?
AI Books is regularly updated with new features and advanced AI algorithms to enhance its capabilities and user experience.
AI Books Review: My Recommendation
AI Books offers a compelling solution for those seeking to expedite book creation. Its AI-powered features can significantly boost efficiency and overcome writer’s block. However, the crucial question remains: is AI-generated content a springboard to success or a shortcut to mediocrity? This review has equipped you with the knowledge to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks. Ultimately, the decision of whether AI Books becomes your writing companion hinges on your individual needs, expectations, and commitment to crafting a truly unique and impactful book.
>> Click Here To Get AI Books Now & Limited Time Access <<
Check Out My Previous Reviews: Scalar App Review, AI Gigz Hub Review, WP Funnels Review, Gizmo Review, Auto Health Sites Review, Vocal Clone AI Review, TubeBuildr AI Review, & ClickSchedule Ai Review.
Thank for reading my AI Books Review till the end. Hope it will help you to make purchase decision perfectly.
Disclaimer:
It’s important to note that pricing and specific features of AI Books can change. While this review strives to provide accurate information, referring to the official AI Books website for the latest updates is recommended. Additionally, this review is not a substitute for your own judgment. We encourage you to explore AI Books and similar software options to determine the best fit for your book creation journey.
Note: This is a paid software, however the one-time cost is $17 for lifetime access.
#AI Books#AI Books App#AI Books Upgrades#AI Books Overview#AI Books Features#AI Books Review#AI Books Works#What Is AI Books#Buy AI Books#AI Books Price#AI Books Demo#AI Books Discount#AI Books Honest Review#AI Books Pricing#AI Books FE#AI Books Pros#AI Books OTO#AI Books Preview#AI Books Scam#Get AI Books#AI Books Reviews#Purchase AI Books#AI Books Legal#Artificial Intelligence#AI#AI Books Benefits#AI Books Bonus#AI Books Bonuses#AI Books Software#AI Books Software Review
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
After going through this article on PCHomeWorld, I have learned so much about how ChatGPT applications on iPhones can improve efficiency toward conducting businesses. Here are a few key points:
Improved Communication: The most tangible benefit that I derived was an increase in communication efficiency. The saving of my time was by drafting all the emails and responses to customer queries via ChatGPT and, most importantly, making all communication uniformly professional. This has been particularly useful for handling routine inquiries and follow-ups, allowing me to focus on more strategic tasks.
Enhanced Collaboration: ChatGPT applications have been utilized to ensure better collaboration within the team. With such apps, scheduling, setting reminders, and arranging meetings have become very easy, and it allows me to become better coordinated with my team. There's in-built AI for reminders and notifications to ensure every person is in the loop and reduce the likelihood of missing a deadline or something important.
24/7 Customer Service: The superb applications of ChatGPT have such features built in, meaning customer service is never unavailable. With the help of these applications, I can instantly respond to client queries at whichever time of the day. This boosts customer satisfaction and makes the client more loyal, as they appreciate such timely and prompt responses.
Efficient Content Creation: ChatGPT apps make it super easy to create content for anything, be it a blog post, social media update, or any other marketing document. This makes it so easy for me to still have a good online presence without putting in too much time for the writing and editing process. A user can create content in a consistent and energetic way, therefore making the deliverables come through. The PCHomeWorld article further elaborates on these benefits by giving tangible examples and use case scenarios. For example, the article cites ChatGPT apps intended for enterprise use and concrete examples of how one would implement them in an organization. It also goes to the extent of dealing with the promising future of AI-based improvements in increased business efficiency.
Overall, it has been as transformational as having ChatGPT apps bundled into what I like to call my work ecosystem. Automating repetitive work with sharp communication, this app lets me ruminate on the strategic growth areas rather than anything else for my business.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Dev Diaries
October 1, 2023
My goodness, it's the first devlog post-Crushed release!! How did that happen???
And where the heck has 2023 gone?!?! 🙃
Okay, pausing--for like four seconds--on the sillies, I've got some updates for y'all, so have a seat and get comfy.
Crushed updated build is out!!!
Now with the rest of the partial voice acting!!!
It was a super fun experience with the VA and I giggled a lot to hear the words I wrote spoken into existence. I think the next project I work on with voice work will also be partial. However, I can't imagine doing a whole game with full voice work. I can feel the mental break down from that possibility making its descent....
The postmortem was longer than I anticipated it to be, so it shall be posted separately (and with a read more for your scrolling needs) sometime! I go into (more) details on my inspiration and the process from hesitant idea, to jam entry, to a full-blown game, and all the heartbreak and burnout and catharsis in between!
You can also search 'gamedev rambles' or 'crushed vn' where I've already blabbed about Development Tingz LOL.
2. The HBG Twitter account has been nuked.
Yeah. Apologies if this is how you're finding out about it. I honestly have no idea where my audience is located as y'all are a quiet (but supportive) bunch. But for me as a player, it hurts because many of my peers are only on or are most active on Twitter.
However, me and the bird app have been at odds for a while so I guess it was just a matter of time... 🥲
3. Game Jam Gemini Mode
Alright, time to get serious-serious. (HA!)
While I was Fighting The Good Fight concerning getting Crushed up before the summer ended, I started dropping hints about the next project I wanted to work on with Yuri Jam (and Once Upon A Time jam) coming up.
Well. After giving it some thought, forcing myself to pause long enough to breathe, catching up on personal reading and other things, and again, giving it more thought: nope.
I could ignore this decision which I hate and push on anyway, but the consequences are not ones I want to deal with, nor will I be physically able to handle. (Yes, this is a direct reference to my health lol).
My plan about this time was to start reaching out to people and create a team--given that I banged out a script at lighting speed just so I knew what roles I needed and was prepared. I'm still not sure where that burst of frenzied energy came from, but it's gone now.
And then in between making Crushed live and getting the first voiced update done, I started to feel really weird. Like "Hello, Anxiety My Old Friend" weird. And I kept berating myself for dragging my feet, especially as Yuri Jam (and OUAT) are so 'chill' and 'easy-going' and why was I still freaking out? What was wrong with me???
Anyway, once the last voiced update went live, it hit me how utterly exhausted I was. Still am(?) So it's insane to think I was somehow going to have enough energy to lead a whole ass team to create one more project before the year ends. Even if said project was under 5k words.
Even as I write this saying I'm done, a part of me keeping scheming up ways to make it work.
But I wouldn't be doing it for the right reasons anyway (i.e. feeling like I should participate in more jams because every other developer is and I'm a bad indie dev if I don't, and feeling this desperation to prove I can tell other kinds of stories. ahahahaha)
A L S O I am broke 😂 And money talks louder than anything else!! This was the year--and continues to be the year-- of medical expenses and emergencies so like...gotta recover from that too.
The Knight Dance (my short Yuri idea) shall return, but next year at the earliest. And who knows? It might benefit from me not working on it now. Or that's what I'm telling myself so my brain will chill.
4. Tackling Ko-fi
I keep saying I'm going to start putting content on ko-fi, or posts, or something, and I keep proving to be a liar. That ends soon!
I've been playing around with the idea of adding both content for subs and one-time donators as well as free content, these things all exclusive to ko-fi. So there's an incentive to you guys to visit and an incentive for me to keep up with it.
There's a lot to the world of HSD/Crushed that just didn't make it into the games, and probably won't for a while, and then there are drabbles and longer stories that would be fun to write and share for anyone who's curious.
Okay!!!
In conclusion!!!
Go play Crushed!! Go support some game Kickstarters!! Go support a Pateron/Ko-fi of your fave creator!! Go replay some games!!
And watch this space for the Crushed postmortem and my yearly games & demos wrap up!!
And maaaaaaaybe catch me on the sideblog where I embody the cringe gamer girl I truly am???
~ Gemini
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Rise of Smart Classes and Learning Apps: K12 Education
Experience the tech revolution in K12 education! Smart classes, learning apps, and understanding the benefits of smart classes and the reliability of NCERT syllabus. one concept at a time!”
K12 Education: “Understanding Concepts”
Hello everyone! Have you noticed how technology is completely upending our way of life? Well, it’s not just our day-to-day activities that are being affected, but even good ol’ education! Yep, things are changing in the classroom too, especially when it comes to K12 education.
Now, hang on a sec,
what’s this K12 thing?

Image Source: ( google — Digital Teacher )
You see, the K12 curriculum isn’t going through massive changes. That’s because the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) knows its stuff. They’ve picked out the most important things you need to learn during your school years and made sure they’re included in the syllabus. They’ve got your back!
Importance of Conceptual Understanding:

So, here’s the secret ingredient:
Understanding the concepts. And guess what? Some schools are introducing something super cool called smart classes. Sounds awesome, right? These smart classes take you beyond mindless memorization and actually help you understand what you’re learning. Because when you truly understand stuff, it sticks with you for life! And that means you can tackle all those tricky challenges life throws your way armed with your trusty knowledge.
Embracing Change in Education
Now, not all smart class providers are created equal. You gotta choose wisely, my pals. Look for someone like Learning Solutions. They’re the real deal when it comes to explaining things in a way that even your K12-educated brain can easily wrap its head around. Trust me, the education you get in school is super important. It’s like the foundation of who you are as an individual.
youtube
So, buckle up, my little geniuses, and get ready to conquer the world, one concept at a time!
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Why Businesses Are Choosing Mobile App Development Companies in Chicago for Scalable Growth in 2025

The mobile application development industry is constantly changing. Based on new technologies, user needs, changing lifestyles, etc. trends will continually be changing.
In order to stay successful you must be on top of these changing trends! Each year as a contributing author at the Forbes Technology Council I have the chance to study the changes in the industry and brainstorm with elite technology executives about how to stay ahead.
If you are in the business of reselling mobile apps, being aware of the current trends will help you better serve your clients. The same thing goes if you are a content creator or business on the hunt for increased growth opportunities with a powerful mobile app.
Are you prepared for what’s next in mobile application development? Work with a top Mobile App Development Company in Chicago for the best Mobile Application Development.
Mobile app development trends
What I have listed below is much more than a feeling or my opinion. I have done the fact-finding to determine the top app development trends that will define 2025.
1. AI & Machine Learning
AI technology is reinventing mobile apps in a ton of ways with chat bots, recommendations, and predictive analytics, among other things. Various businesses in Chicago are capitalizing on Mobile App Development Services in Chicago in order to create AI-powered applications as there is enormous potential for increased user engagement, customization, and automation. AI is making apps smarter and more intuitive, from voice assistants to smarter search capabilities.
2. 5G-Enabled App Experiences
With the rollout of 5G networks by major carriers, apps are able to offer new, ultra-fast speeds, real-time streaming, and high-quality AR/VR capabilities. The best Mobile App Partner in Chicago can help businesses maximize their app's capabilities for 5G connectivity, and improve app performance with low latency for ideal performance in gaming apps, video apps, and IoT-enabled solutions.
3. Increased Use of Super Apps
Apps like WeChat and Grab have defined what "super apps" have emerged that provide users with various services like messaging, e-commerce, payments, shopping, and gaming. A Mobile App Development Company in Chicago can help brands bring their services together into a powerful app that will enhance convenience and user adoption.
4. More App Security & Privacy Functions
As Cyber attacks increase, biometrics, end to end encryption, securing data for users not violating GDPR and CCPA is critical. Any security breaches are the highest priority for many companies and strengthening security in their apps is a priority. Using a Mobile App Development Service in Chicago will produce more secure breaches and develop trust with your users.
5. Cross-Platform Development
In order to not be time and cost efficient, more companies are realizing the benefits of cross-platform frameworks such as Flutter and React Native. Mobile App Partner in Chicago can now develop high-performance iOS and Android applications with a single code, which helps increase speed during the development and maintains quality.
6. Wearable & IoT App Integration
The current popularity of smartwatches, fitness trackers, and connected smart home appliances are increasing the demand for apps compatible with wearables. Companies in Chicago can king a Mobile App Development Company in Chicago consider creating connected IoT-apps, whether it’s used for health to home automation.
Conclusion
Is Your Business Prepared for These Trends? Getting ahead of the game in mobile applications requires the latest technology. Regardless of your location, partnering with a good Mobile App Development Services in Chicago will ensure your app stays relevant, secure and user-friendly. Let's create the future together!
#Mobile App Development Company in Chicago#Mobile App Development Services in Chicago#Mobile App Development Agency in Chicago
0 notes
Text
How to Create a UPI Account Instantly: Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners
In today’s digital world, transferring money has become faster and easier, thanks to UPI. Whether you want to send money to a friend, pay bills, or shop online, all you need is a UPI account. If you're new to digital banking, don’t worry. This guide will walk you through everything you need to know to get started.
What is a UPI Account?
A UPI account lets you send and receive money directly from your bank using a mobile app. UPI stands for Unified Payments Interface, which is a simple and secure way to do bank transfers anytime. You don’t need to remember account numbers or IFSC codes—just use your UPI number, also known as your Virtual Payment Address (VPA), like yourname@bankname.
It’s fast, easy to use, and completely free.
Why You Should Use UPI
Having a UPI account comes with many benefits:
You can do UPI transfer instantly—24/7, even on holidays.
You don’t need cash or cards to make payments.
It connects with all major banks.
You can make secure UPI payments with PIN protection.
Everything happens through a trusted UPI net banking app on your phone.
What You Need to Set Up a UPI Account
Before you start, keep these things ready:
A smartphone with internet
A mobile number linked to your bank account
A valid debit card
A trusted mobile banking app or a UPI net banking app
Step-by-Step Guide to Create My UPI Account
Step 1: Download a UPI App
Choose a trusted UPI net banking app from the Play Store or App Store. Look for apps from well-known banks or verified providers.
Step 2: Verify Your Mobile Number
Open the app and allow it to read your SMS. The app will automatically verify your mobile number that’s linked with your bank.
Step 3: Link Your Bank Account
Once your number is verified, the app will show a list of banks. Select your bank, and your account will be linked automatically.
Step 4: Set Your UPI PIN
To keep your account safe, set a secure UPI PIN using your debit card details. This PIN will be required for all transactions.
Step 5: Get Your UPI Number
After the setup, you’ll receive your UPI number or VPA. It usually looks like yourname@upi or mobilenumber@bankname. This is what you’ll share to receive money.
How to Use Your UPI Account
Once your UPI account is ready, you can:
Send or receive money instantly
Scan QR codes to pay shops and vendors
Pay electricity, water, and mobile bills
Recharge your phone or DTH
Check account balances and transaction history
All payments happen securely with your UPI PIN, so your money stays safe.
Tips to Keep Your UPI Account Secure
Using UPI is safe, but here are some simple tips to protect your money:
Never share your UPI PIN with anyone
Always use official and trusted apps
Use app lock, fingerprint, or face ID
Don’t click on unknown payment links
If you see anything unusual, contact your bank or app support immediately
UPI Account Setup Summary
Step
What You Need to Do
Download App
Use a trusted UPI net banking app
Verify Number
Link your mobile number to your bank
Link Bank Account
Choose and connect your bank
Set UPI PIN
Use your debit card to create a PIN
Get UPI Number
Start using your VPA for payments
Conclusion
Setting up a UPI account is quick and simple. It saves time, offers instant transfers, and keeps your money secure. Whether you're paying bills, shopping, or sending money to family, UPI makes it all super easy. If you haven’t created your UPI yet, now is the perfect time to do it and enjoy smart, secure digital banking.
#mobilebanking app upi#upi mobile banking app#new bank account upi limit#upi transfer#secure upi#my upi#secure upi payment#upi net banking app#upi number#new upi payment app#app upi mobile banking#bank upi#upi mobile banking#mobile banking upi#upi khata
0 notes
Text
How do you handle session management in Java for web applications?
1. Intro to Java Session Management
So, how do you manage sessions in Java for web apps? This is a key question for developers who want to create safe and scalable applications. Session management is all about keeping track of a user's activity on a web app over time. Java has built-in tools for this using HttpSession, cookies, and URL rewriting. Learning how to handle sessions well is an important skill, and taking a Java course in Coimbatore can provide you with hands-on experience. Whether you're just starting out or looking to be a full-stack developer, getting the hang of session concepts is essential for building secure and efficient apps.
2. Understanding HttpSession in Java
So, what about HttpSession? It’s the go-to API for managing sessions in Java. It keeps track of a user's info across several HTTP requests, created by the servlet container. You can access it using request.getSession(). With it, you can store user-specific data like login details or shopping cart items. If you enroll in Java training in Coimbatore, you will learn to create and manage sessions the right way. HttpSession also has methods to end sessions and track them, making it a key part of Java web development.
3. Session Tracking Techniques
When it comes to tracking sessions, there are some common methods: cookies, URL rewriting, and hidden form fields. Cookies are small bits of data saved on the client side, while URL rewriting adds session IDs to URLs. Hidden fields are less used but are still an option. These methods are thoroughly covered in a Java Full Stack Developer Course in Coimbatore. Knowing these options helps you pick the right one for your project. Each method has its benefits based on your app's security and scalability needs.
4. Importance of Session Timeout
Managing session timeout is super important for security and user experience. You can set up timeouts in the web.xml file or by using session.setMaxInactiveInterval(). This helps avoid unused sessions from taking up server resources and lowers the risk of hijacking. Sessions automatically end after a certain time without activity. In a Java course in Coimbatore, you’ll learn how to set timeout values that fit your app's needs. Proper timeout handling is part of building secure Java applications.
5. Secure Session Management Practices
How do you ensure session management is secure in your Java web applications? Always use HTTPS, create new session IDs when a user logs in, and end sessions when they log out. Avoid keeping sensitive info in sessions. Developers taking Java training in Coimbatore learn to apply these practices in real-life projects. Good session management isn't just about saving data; it's about protecting it, which helps safeguard against threats like session fixation.
6. Storing Complex Data in Sessions
When it comes to more complex data, Java sessions can handle that too. You can store objects using session.setAttribute(), which is great for keeping user profiles and cart items. Just remember that the objects need to be serializable and avoid making the session too big. Practical lessons in a Java Full Stack Developer Course in Coimbatore often touch on these points. Good data storage practices can improve performance and keep your code clean.
7. Session Persistence and Scalability
In cases where applications are spread across multiple servers, you have to think about sharing sessions. This can be done with persistent sessions or clustering. Tools like Redis and Memcached help manage state across servers. These ideas are often covered in advanced modules of Java courses in Coimbatore. Learning about session replication and load balancing is key to scaling your app while keeping the state intact.
8. Invalidating and Cleaning Sessions
Another important part of session management is cleaning up. Properly ending sessions is crucial. You can use session.invalidate() when a user logs out to terminate a session. Also, make sure to remove unnecessary attributes to save memory. Good session cleanup is important to prevent memory leaks and keep your app running smoothly. These topics are usually explained in Java training in Coimbatore, teaching students how to manage sessions responsibly.
9. Real-world Applications of Session Management
Understanding the theory is just one part. How does session management play out in the real world? Examples include e-commerce carts, user logins, and personalized dashboards. Sessions are essential for adding a personal touch. The Java Full Stack Developer Course in Coimbatore includes practical projects where session management is used in real web apps. Learning through practical examples helps solidify the concept and prepares developers for actual job roles.
10. Conclusion with Career Opportunities
Getting a handle on session management in Java can really open up job opportunities in backend or full-stack roles. With a solid grasp of HttpSession, tracking methods, and security measures, you'll be able to build secure applications. Whether you’re taking a Java course in Coimbatore or pursuing a full-stack course, this is a key topic you shouldn't overlook. At Xplore IT Corp, we focus on making sure our students are ready for the industry with practical session handling skills and more.
FAQs
1. What’s a session in Java web applications?
A session tracks a single user's activity with a web app over multiple requests and keeps user-specific info.
2. How do I create a session in Java?
You can create one using request.getSession() in servlet-based apps.
3. How do I expire a session in Java?
Use session.invalidate() to end it or set a timeout with setMaxInactiveInterval().
4. What are the options other than HttpSession?
You can use cookies, URL rewriting, hidden fields, or client-side storage depending on what you need.
5. Why is secure session management important?
To protect against threats like session hijacking and to keep user data safe.
#ava servlet session#Java web security#Java session timeout#Session tracking in Java#Cookies in Java#URL rewriting in Java#HttpSession methods#Java EE sessions#Serializable Java object#Java backend development
0 notes
Text
Brighten Your Space with Stylish and Affordable LED Lights
LED lights have transformed the way we brighten our homes, workspaces, and public areas. They’re efficient, durable, and incredibly versatile, making them a go-to choice for anyone wanting to cut costs and make eco-friendly decisions. If you’re in Jaipur, LED light manufacturers in Jaipur are creating innovative lighting that caters to all kinds of needs. Let’s explore why LEDs are so loved, their benefits, and how they can refresh your environment.
What Makes LEDs Stand Out?
LEDs, or Light-Emitting Diodes, are a significant leap from the old incandescent bulbs. They use far less power, often slashing energy use by up to 80% while delivering the same, or even better, glow. This translates to smaller electricity bills, which is always a plus. Additionally, they last for a long time, so you won’t need to constantly replace bulbs. LED light manufacturers in Jaipur provide a variety of options, from soft, warm lights for cosy evenings to bright ones for focused tasks.
Another big win? LEDs are kind to the planet. Unlike fluorescent bulbs, they’re free of nasty chemicals like mercury, and their low energy consumption eases the load on power grids. Whether you’re lighting a tiny apartment or a large office, LEDs are a practical, green solution.
Perfect for Any Setting
LEDs shine when it comes to flexibility. Want a calm, inviting atmosphere in your lounge? Choose warm-toned LEDs. Need crisp, clear light for your desk or kitchen? Cool white LEDs are ideal. They come in all sorts of strips, panels, classic bulbs, even smart lights you can tweak with an app. This makes them great for everything from home makeovers to garden lighting.
While upgrading, don’t skip the small touches that boost both look and function. Pairing LEDs with modern switches can tie it all together. In Jaipur, you can buy electrical switches in Jaipur to match your vibe, whether that’s sleek and modern or timeless and traditional.
Savings That Last
Let’s get to the numbers. LEDs might cost a bit more at first, but they’re a bargain over time. A single LED bulb can keep shining for up to 25,000 hours, that’s over 20 years with a few hours of daily use! Compare that to old-school bulbs, which fizzle out after about 1,000 hours. Add in their energy efficiency, and your bills will noticeably drop. For those in Jaipur, choosing LEDs from reliable LED light manufacturers in Jaipur guarantees quality and long-term savings.
Simple to Set Up
Switching to LEDs is super easy. Most fit right into standard sockets, so no need to mess with your wiring. If you’re going for a bigger upgrade, like smart lighting or new fixtures, consider the extras. For instance, you can buy electrical switches in Jaipur to complement your LEDs, with options like dimmers to adjust the mood or task at hand.
Lighting the Way Forward
LEDs keep evolving. From bulbs that sync with your smart home to tough outdoor lights that handle any weather, they’re packed with possibilities. They also stay cool, making them safer by reducing fire risks. For anyone aiming to modernise, LEDs blend practicality with flair in a way that’s tough to match.
In a nutshell, LED lights are a straightforward choice for brighter, more affordable, and environmentally friendly illumination. Whether you’re in Jaipur or elsewhere, they’re a simple upgrade with a big impact. Why not check out what’s available? Grab some high-quality LEDs from local suppliers, and consider adding a few stylish switches to watch your space transform. Your home and your budget will feel the difference.
0 notes
Text
View Your UHC Card on Your Phone
If you’re a UnitedHealthcare (UHC) member, you don’t need to carry your physical ID card everywhere. With the UHC mobile app, you can easily view your digital ID card, check your benefits, and manage your health plan right from your smartphone.
How to View Your UHC Card on Your Phone
Download the “UnitedHealthcare” app from the App Store or Google Play.
Sign in or create an account using your Member ID and personal info.
Once logged in, go to "ID Card" section.
View, save, or share your digital UHC card instantly!
My Experience
I activated my UHC card at activate.uhc.com and downloaded the app right after. The setup was quick and simple. Now, I use the app every time I visit a doctor or pharmacy—no need to carry the physical card. It's super convenient, especially when I forget my wallet!
FAQs
Q: Is the digital card accepted everywhere? Yes! Most clinics, hospitals, and pharmacies accept the digital UHC card shown on the app.
Q: What if I forget my password? You can reset it easily in the app login screen by tapping "Forgot Password."
Q: Is the app secure? Yes, it uses encryption and login protection to keep your health info safe.
Conclusion
Managing your healthcare should be easy—and with the UHC mobile app, it really is. By keeping your UHC card on your phone, you’ll always be ready for doctor visits, prescriptions, or emergencies. Download the app, sign in, and simplify your health experience today.
1 note
·
View note
Text
Typography Trends in 2025: What Designers Need to Know
Typography is no longer just about selecting a readable font—it’s a storytelling tool, a brand voice, and a key driver of user experience. In 2025, the world of typography is evolving fast, blending creativity, technology, and personality. If you're taking a graphic design course in Noida or anywhere else, staying on top of these trends is a must.
Whether you're a beginner or a design pro, this guide will help you understand the top typography trends of 2025—and how to use them in your own work.
🔠 Why Typography Matters More Than Ever
Typography isn't just about fonts—it's about function, emotion, and brand identity.
Visual hierarchy: Guides users through content with ease.
Personality: Fonts help tell a brand’s story before a word is read.
Accessibility: Good typography makes content more readable for everyone.
If you're enrolled in a graphic design course in Noida, you're likely learning that strong typography separates amateur design from professional work.
✨ 1. Expressive & Experimental Typefaces
Say goodbye to safe and predictable. Designers in 2025 are embracing wild, distorted, and hand-drawn fonts that create emotion and grab attention.
Where to use it: Posters, campaigns, branding for creative industries.
🔁 2. Variable Fonts Go Mainstream
One font file, unlimited style variations? That’s the magic of variable fonts, now fully supported in most browsers and design tools.
Benefits:
Faster web load times.
Greater control over weight, width, and slant.
Responsive and scalable typography for any screen.
🌗 3. Dark Mode Typography
With more apps and devices offering dark mode, designers are adjusting typography to work beautifully against darker backgrounds.
Tips:
Avoid pure white; use soft light colors for better legibility.
Increase line spacing.
Use open and clean fonts like Inter or IBM Plex.
🧠 4. AI-Generated Fonts
AI tools are helping designers create original typefaces faster than ever before.
Tools to explore:
Fontjoy (for font pairing)
Fontark (for building custom fonts)
Students taking a graphic design course in Noida are increasingly experimenting with AI in their type and branding projects.
📱 5. Responsive Typography for Multi-Device Design
From phones and tablets to smartwatches and foldables, typography must now adapt seamlessly across all devices.
Tricks:
Use fluid units like clamp() in CSS.
Ensure text maintains contrast and legibility at any size.
🖋 6. Retro Meets Futurism
Old-school vibes meet sleek modern aesthetics. Think vintage serif fonts combined with neon colors or digital glitch effects.
Popular fonts: Mazius Display, Be Vietnam Pro, or GT Super.
👁️ 7. Motion Typography
Text that moves = text that captivates. Designers are using animation to bring typography to life on websites and in videos.
Use cases:
Scroll-triggered animations.
Loading screen effects.
Micro-interactions in apps.
Learn this in advanced modules of a graphic design course in Noida focused on UI/UX or motion graphics.
🧩 8. Custom Fonts for Branding
With every brand fighting for attention, custom fonts have become a way to stand out.
Why it works:
Creates brand recognition.
Offers full creative control.
Hard to replicate by competitors.
💡 Quick Tips for Designers
Pair expressive fonts with simple ones for balance.
Always test your typography across devices.
Use contrast checkers for accessibility compliance.
Stay inspired by following platforms like Typewolf and Fonts In Use.
📍 Why Learn Typography in a Graphic Design Course in Noida?
Noida has become a growing hub for design education and creative tech in India. Enrolling in a graphic design course in Noida gives you access to:
Hands-on projects on modern typography.
Training in tools like Figma, Adobe Fonts, and After Effects.
Industry exposure through design internships and studio visits.
Knowledge of both traditional type and digital trends.
Whether you want to freelance, join a design agency, or start your own brand, mastering typography is a core skill—and Noida offers excellent resources to help you do just that.
✅ Wrap-Up: Stay Ahead with Smart Typography
Typography in 2025 is dynamic, expressive, and tech-savvy. By mastering these trends, you can create designs that are not only beautiful but also functional, memorable, and user-focused.So if you're exploring a graphic design course in Noida, make sure it includes strong modules on typography—because type is more than design. It’s a language of its own.
0 notes