#chat gpt will replace programmer | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

chatgptdevelopers · 1 year ago

Text

How API Integration and chatgpt can replace programmers

How chatgpt can replace programmers?

Traditional programming paradigms are being transformed by advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and API integration in the ever changing field of software development. The development of OpenAI’s chatgpt replace developers, an AI-powered language model, is one such significant achievement. With its incredible potential, chatgpt replace developers will surely change the way developers approach coding tasks, raising the possibility that it may eventually completely replace human programmers.

API integration has long been a cornerstone of modern software development, enabling applications to communicate and interact with each other seamlessly. By leveraging APIs, developers can incorporate various functionalities and services into their applications without reinventing the wheel. This modular approach not only accelerates development cycles but also enhances the overall user experience.

But the introduction of chatgpt replace developers adds a new level of complexity to the programming world. Thanks to deep learning algorithms, ChatGPT is able to understand and produce writing that appears human depending on the context that is given to it. This implies that developers can now communicate naturally with ChatGPT, asking for help and efficiently producing code snippets.

One of the key areas where chatgpt can replace programmers, shows immense promise is in code generation and automation. Traditionally, developers spend considerable time writing and debugging code to implement various features and functionalities. With ChatGPT, developers can simply describe their requirements in plain language, and the model can generate the corresponding code snippets, significantly reducing development time and effort.

For example, developers can define the desired functionality to chatgpt can replace programmers,, such as “parse JSON data and extract relevant fields,” rather than developing a function by hand to parse JSON data from an API response. The required code snippet can then be generated by ChatGPT based on the developer’s requirements. As a result, the development process has been simplified and developers are free to focus on making more complex architectural choices and solving problems.

Additionally, chatgpt can replace programmers, can be a very helpful tool for developers who need advice or help with fixing problems. Developers can refer to ChatGPT for advice and insights when solving complex issues or exploring different ways for implementation. Developers can gain a wealth of knowledge and optimal methodologies to guide their decision-making process by utilizing the collective wisdom contained in ChatGPT’s extensive training dataset.

However, the prospect of chatgpt can replace programmers, replacing human programmers entirely remains a topic of debate and speculation within the developer community. While ChatGPT excels at generating code based on provided prompts, it lacks the nuanced understanding and creative problem-solving abilities inherent to human developers. Additionally, concerns regarding the ethical implications of AI-driven automation in software development continue to be raised.

It’s important to understand that chatgpt can replace programmers,is meant to enhance developers’ skills and simplify specific parts of the development process, not to replace them. Developers can boost productivity, drive creativity, and ultimately provide end users with better software solutions by using AI-powered technologies like ChatGPT.

In conclusion, the convergence of API integration and AI-driven technologies like ChatGPT is reshaping the dynamics of programming in profound ways. While API integration facilitates seamless interaction between software components, chatgpt can replace programmers with natural language interfaces and code generation capabilities. While the idea of ChatGPT replacing human programmers entirely may be far-fetched, its potential to augment and enhance developer productivity is undeniable. As the field of AI continues to advance, developers must embrace these innovations as valuable tools in their arsenal, driving greater efficiency and innovation in software development.

For More Information Visit Best Digital Marketing Company in Indore

#chat gpt programmers #chat gpt will replace programmer #software developer replaced by ai #openai replace programmers #Gpt Developer #chatGpt programmers

0 notes

onyv · 2 years ago

Text

DESIGN INNOVATION - OUTCOME

USE OF Ai IN THE ILLUSTRATIONS OF ALICE IN WONDERLAND I

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW/SCOPE OF WORK

Artificial intelligence.. It will change business, it will affect content creation, it will take over workplaces and social networks, starting from replacing physical work first, and gradually reaching the replacement of highly skilled professions such as programmers, teachers, lawyers, doctors, and all art professions (including designers!) For example, the new DALL·E 2 AI is a system that can create realistic images and art from natural language descriptions. There are some more aspects of the entry of AI into humans life in the near future: There will be a new type of videos - without human participation, in which, by using your personal photos, the AI can fully reproduce the appearance and even the voice of the user. Thus, practically any photo can be made to speak, which will lead to a new kind of (robotic) influencers on YOUTUBE as the normal biological ones will simply disappear. Of course, there will also be some negatives: Some sites, such as This Person Does Not exist.com are a generators for creating people from Artificial Intelligence, and the special thing is that none of these people actually exist. Similarly, a human voice can be generated based on an existing one. In such a case, it will be really very difficult to verify who is saying what Even the identity of the speaker can be perfectly recreated from his photo.

SOUNDRᐱW is an AI that creates a music. The users need just select the style of music and from there the AI generates hundreds of songs for them that they can combine, mix different beats, use to sound their YouTube videos, etc.

Chat GPT is a robot (Ai) that users can talk to. It's a text system that listens them and learns from their questions. Something like Google, but instead of offering dozens of sites to read and explore, the info is arranged in a few sentences. But its capabilities are much greater than that (in fact, its limitations are only the users ability to ask questions!) For example, it can be asked for health information, or to write some school homework, to create film scripts, or to offer a cooking recipe..

And if we go even further… Those of us connected to Elon Musk's Neuralink will be able to input and receive information much faster because they won't be limited by our fingers. This means that compared to everyone else this will make us somewhat superhuman and we will be able to see the beginnings of two races:

- the one that is the normal one that we know. The biological one. - and the one that merges with the machine.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.2 AIM, INTENT, METHODOLOGY

AIM :

The aim of this study is to offer an Ai-assisted layout (cover and spreads with illustrations) for the book “Alice in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll.

METHODOLOGY :

OUR INTENT :

We will apply what we learned from our research to our Ai-created book layout proposal.

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.1 CHAPTER I

2.1.1 Consumer culture / subculture

MIDJOURNEY is an artificial intelligence generator that turns language descriptions called "prompts" into images. With his help, everyone, without mediation of artists or designers, can create unique works of art in а minutes after entering text instructions. Works through DISCORD server.

This subculture arose in San Francisco, California, as a result of the need of young people (16-30+…) to develop their artistic and creative digital ideas. It is globally positioned (GCCP) as it uses digitization and the entry of artificial intelligence into our lives. It can follow the strategy: To achieve perfect realism more easily.

The scales for measuring consumer culture can be, for example :

perception of quality (is the image have a very high quality?)

social prestige (does it represent the latest trends in digital art?)

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.1 CHAPTER I

2.1.2 Consumer culture of Millennials

Millennials have grown up in a time of great technological change and love technology (the internet and social media to connect with people, places.)

Motivation : creative work that has a positive impact on others.

Ideas - they believe in cooperation and sharing of all ideas and opinions without the priority of traditional hierarchy. They are good problem solvers and receptive to feedback. They are multifunctional and flexible and do not share the idea of a fixed work schedule (but they value their working time.)

Changes - they are very adaptable to changes (both technological and societal.)

Lifestyle - skillfully balance work and personal life. They value education and up-skilling.They practice healthy life style. They are not strongly attached to material things and real estate.

ALEXA is an example of a consumer product often used by Millennials in their daily lives.

ALEXA is a virtual assistant technology which replaces the expensive and difficult to carry devices from the 90s. It is small, compact and easy to carry even abroad. It is readily available and can be found at a relatively reasonable price anywhere. ALEXA is a reflection of Millennials' active lives and their affinity for technology but it's also evidence that they don't like to commit to buying things.

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.1 CHAPTER I

2.1.3 Key trends in the field of interest (market segment)

The illustrations are intended for an adult audience (both men and women) but due to the interpretive nature of the issues discussed, the focus falls on women (after all, Alice is a girl!)

The idea is to cover a wide market segment of women - from children - bordering on teenagers and socially active 'career' women to housewives.

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.1 CHAPTER I

2.1.4 Co-creation design

As an example of co-creation at the moment could point the influencers' channels on youtube where the followers give a feedback in the comments and express their wishes for the next topic or guest on the channel - and the influencer should comply with that if wants to continue growing his channel.

As a more specific example in the field of development of Ai in life and art (and the possible consequences to which this may lead) could be pointed the course 'The Future of Being Human' by

Anders Sandberg, a fellow at Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, where аs a part of the course, there are in-video quiz questions to consolidate students learning and discussion boards to have their say.

During the course Sandberg explains the roots of modern transhumanist thinking and the aims of transhumanism, why we age and can we stop this process, he predicted what humanity would look like billions of years from now and does it make sense in genetically engineered life where anything is possible.

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.2 CHAPTER II

2.2.1 Design problem

How can Alice survive in the 21st century? What challenges does she face in the era of artificial intelligence ?

The reimagining and adaptation of this character will be examined as a juxtaposition with some of the existing visual interpretations of Alice, as well as like a new modern proposal for its visual personalization nowaday.

Unlike the 19th century, when the original text was perceived as nothing more than " a healthy dose of fun and nonsense", in the 20th and 21st centuries, hidden beneath the witty puns and innocent banter, far darker trends such as violence, insanity and sexual menace began to emerge.

This understanding is also reflected in most of the modern interpretations of this world classic (films, music, graphic novels, video games) where the modern dangers facing the growing girl are presented.

In the 21st century, Wonderland has become a dark and child-unfriendly environment, and in order to survive in it, Alice from a child must become an independent and strong woman (warrior), able to overcome all dangers and defend herself on all levels .

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.2 CHAPTER II

2.2.2 Ideation board

REVERSE THINKING *

If the main question I need to answer with the illustrations is how to improve the experience, I will try to turn it around with the question: how to complicate this experience as much as possible?

SIX THINKING HATS ***

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.2 CHAPTER II

2.2.3 Presentation of the selected idea

BUILD THREE PERSONAS:

JO is a teenager who grew up in a troubled family: a mother who struggles with her alcohol addiction and a father who is constantly absent and absolutely indifferent when it comes to her upbringing.

Jo has a friend at school with whom she shares everything. The two girls often run away from class together to weed and drink Red Bull in the park. Also, music is a powerful factor that unites them. Together they go to concerts and live performances of various underground bands.

Despite that, Jo feels lonely and misunderstood most of the time. She is a frequent victim of verbal abuse from her classmates, who think she is arrogant and fake. She tries in every way to escape from this reality, which depresses and crushes her. Unfortunately, most of the time she have to deal with everything herself and that's why usually she feels confused and helpless.

EMMA is a manager in a large private company. She is an independent young woman who is successfully striving to build a career in her field. She is an active person and meets many people during her working day. After work, she likes to relax and have fun with friends. She has many friends and admirers, as she is quite attractive, but she is afraid of commitment and a serious relationship with any of them. Emma likes to travel abroad and do sports. She goes to the gym every day.

Her favourite are extreme sports, such as wall climbing and mountain climbing. She lives alone in a spacious studio in a quiet and isolated area of a modern city, but very often visits her parents, to whom she is very attached. Although she has had major disagreements with them in the past, they have managed to overcome them and now despite her busy schedules, daily calls with them are a necessary part of her everyday life.

Emma is doing pretty well with life, but she is not satisfied with what she has achieved and is constantly striving to get more out of it.

Liz is a 50-year-old mother of 3 daughters. She has a master's degree in design, but does not practice, as she takes care of her two younger daughters, students in high school. Her eldest daughter is married and lives separately.

Liz has a family business husband who is away most of the week, so she had to fend for herself. She doesn't have many friends and leads a secluded life devoted entirely to her daughters.

She has recently learned that her husband has multiple extramarital affairs, which he has been carrying on for years. She is disappointed, lonely and misunderstood. Always when she has free time, she reads her favourite Alice books from childhood and struggles to find answers for her own life in them.

SCENARIOS : JO STORYBOARD

SCENARIOS : EMMA STORYBOARD

SCENARIOS : LIZ STORYBOARD

REQUIREMENTS

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.2 CHAPTER II

2.2.4 The importance of Storytelling in Design

JO / TARGET GROUP: Gen Z or Alpha Gen.

GOAL : To provoke discussion through an alternative to the mainstream position: Should there be limits to the use of Ai to generate images and why sometimes do we consider that the borders are crossed.

STORY : Jo is a 15-year-old teenager who grew up with the Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings and Alice in Wonderland books and movies. Feeling lonely most of the time and misunderstood by family and classmates, she finds herself in the Midjourney multiverse, where she can create avatars of her favourite movie characters herself, with the help of Ai. Besides her, this platform is used by hundreds of thousands more creative fans (called story tellers or content creators) who produce an average of 500+ posts per day..

At first, Jo uncritically accepts each publication and each new series of images (characters). She is fascinated by the high quality and realism of the graphics. She uses every minute to enter the platform and discuss with like-minded people.

Sometimes she staying there for hours, forgetting about time as she observes or creates images. It could be said that her addiction is complete until at some point when she begins to feel a slight doubt regarding the newly generated images and the results of them.

Jo is Gen Z and as such is completely unencumbered by racial, sexual, and gender discrimination. She tends to accept everyone equally, regardless of religion, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation. But this is where the doubts start.

.. or to be recognized as models for the most unusual haute couture photo shoot in Manhattan history.

And that wouldn't bother anyone. But when these original characters appear in dark-skinned...

...or non-binary avatars...

...real drama ensues, because some users

do not want to agree with such an

interpretation. According to them, history is

displaced/rewritten/corrupted/corrupted

from the original, and the creators of such

interpretations use Mj as a front to impose

their own theses, According to them, thus

devaluing the true story.

Jo feels confused. She loves diversity and

wants everyone to be able to have equal

rights of expression, but she feels that she

is losing ground under her feet - she herself

could not imagine Harry as anything other

(as a woman or dark-skinned , for example)

than what she already knows.

In this particular case (and in general, with

regard to all world-renowned bestsellers,

broadcasts, etc.), she is inclined to admit

that she would like to have a legally

established copyright, according to which

the originals should be preserved in their

exact version everywhere. Even among the

endless fields of Midjourney.

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.2 CHAPTER II

2.2.5 Environmental and sustainable characteristics options

For the preparation of the illustrations will be used:

Choice of low-impact materials - Risograph, which is an absolutely ecological form of printing. - Soy-based inks pushed through natural fiber stencils. - Wet ink which dries only when absorbed into the paper’s surface thus not requiring much energy to fix toner like a laser printer.

Local sourcing (reduction of transport) - printing materials will be supplied by local manufacturers, without additional costs for shipping/delivery - on the one hand because of the economic bonuses, on the other - because of less environmental pollution through not using transport.

Recyclable design - The cover and illustrations will be printed on 100% recycled or FSC Certified paper. - Within the work were recycled as much leftover paper which can be found, into other items.

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.1 CHAPTER III

2.3.1 Product Development Plan

. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.1 CHAPTER III

2.3.2 Supply chain

2. RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

2.1 CHAPTER III

2.3.3 Business strategy

#designinnovation #MA #design #aliceinwonderland #lewiscarroll #ai #illustrationn #midjourney

2 notes · View notes

twocupsuvblood · 1 year ago

Text

This also ties into the fellatio of programmers and coders in pop culture framing them as advanced super geniuses whose mystical knowledge allows them to understand the unknowable magic computer box. this framing works two fold, it makes the public believe that computers and coding are magical and can solve all of the worlds problems and it makes clueless consumers like what op was talking about. This is why we have people who think chat gpt should replace elementary school teachers and every thing that runs on electricity should connect to WiFi.

another thought about "gen z and gen alpha don't know how to use computers, just phone apps" is that this is intentionally the direction tech companies have pushed things in, they don't want users to understand anything about the underlying system, they want you to just buy a subscription to a thing and if it doesn't do what you need it to, you just upgrade to the more expensive one. users who look at configuration files are their worst nightmare

79K notes · View notes

xpressluna · 1 month ago

Text

Chat GPT Is Poisoning Your Brain: A Closer Look at the Fear and the Facts

In the age of artificial intelligence, provocative claims such as “ChatGPT is poisoning your brain” grab attention—and for good reason. With AI tools like ChatGPT rapidly entering classrooms, workplaces, and everyday conversation, skepticism and concern have followed. Are these fears valid? Or are we just grappling with the growing pains of a powerful technology?

Let’s unpack the fears, facts, and the reality behind this sensational headline.

The Fear: Dependency and Cognitive Decline

The primary concern behind the phrase "poisoning your brain" is the idea that frequent use of ChatGPT (and other AI tools) may lead to:

Reduced critical thinking: Relying on AI for answers may discourage users from thinking through problems themselves.

Intellectual laziness: When answers are instantly available, people may skip the mental effort required to learn and retain information.

Creativity suppression: Critics worry that AI-generated content can water down human originality, especially in writing, brainstorming, or art.

While these concerns aren’t entirely unfounded, they require context.

The Reality: ChatGPT Is a Tool, Not a Replacement for Thought

Let’s be clear—ChatGPT does not have a brain. It’s a sophisticated pattern-matching algorithm trained on enormous amounts of text. It doesn’t “think,” “understand,” or “learn” the way humans do. Its power lies in its ability to generate coherent, context-aware text—but it has no consciousness or intention.

When people use ChatGPT passively or uncritically—accepting its output without reflection—it can dull mental effort. But that’s a user behavior problem, not a flaw in the tool itself.

Think of it like a calculator. Overuse might erode basic math skills, but in capable hands, it enhances speed and accuracy. Similarly, ChatGPT can either augment your thinking or replace it—depending on how you use it.

The Benefits: Amplifying Human Intelligence

Instead of poisoning the brain, many educators, researchers, and professionals argue that ChatGPT enhances productivity and cognitive capacity when used wisely. For example:

Writers use it to overcome blocks or spark ideas.

Students use it for research assistance or studying summaries.

Programmers use it to troubleshoot code and learn new concepts.

Entrepreneurs use it to generate proposals, business ideas, and marketing copy.

In all these cases, ChatGPT is a cognitive amplifier—helping people do more, faster.

The Responsibility: Critical Use and Digital Literacy

The real danger is not ChatGPT itself, but how people use it without understanding its limits.

AI literacy is becoming essential. This means understanding:

ChatGPT can hallucinate (i.e., generate false or misleading information).

It reflects biases present in its training data.

It does not have access to real-time facts unless connected to a live source.

It should be used as a starting point, not a final authority.

Teaching people to engage critically with AI output—fact-checking, questioning, editing—can turn potential harm into powerful help.

Conclusion: Tools Don’t Poison Minds—Misuse Does

So, is ChatGPT poisoning your brain?

Only if you let it.

The real issue is not the tool itself, but how we choose to engage with it. Just like with the internet, smartphones, or calculators, the key lies in education, awareness, and responsible usage.

When used thoughtfully, ChatGPT can sharpen your thinking, boost your productivity, and even inspire your creativity. But if you treat it as a brain replacement rather than a brain extender, the risks are real.

The question isn’t whether ChatGPT will make you smarter or dumber. The question is: Will you think for yourself?

#trending #viral trends #art trend #viral #united states #canada

0 notes

jcmarchi · 1 year ago

Text

Reprogramming the Future: How AI is Redefining Developers and Languages

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/reprogramming-the-future-how-ai-is-redefining-developers-and-languages/

Reprogramming the Future: How AI is Redefining Developers and Languages

The era of AI-powered programming is upon us, and it’s not just a supporting act; it’s stealing the limelight. AI is already rewriting the rules of code creation. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to its potential. In the not-so-distant future, algorithms are poised to eliminate language barriers and radically transform the role of human developers. So, are we witnessing the end of the human programmer as we know it? Let’s find out.

AI’s Impact: Progress and Challenges

The CEO of Stability AI paints a dark picture for programmers, boldly claiming that artificial intelligence will replace them within just five years. OpenAI is going all-in, assembling an “army” of external contractors to supercharge their model training, potentially obliterating entry-level coding jobs. Bloomberg ominously declares that India’s massive pool of 5 million coders is on the brink of an AI jobpocalypse. Despite these dire forecasts, discussions on Reddit suggest that many programmers are nonchalant about their job security. But can we afford to remain so presumptuous in the face of such a radical shift?

If you think AI is just a sideshow, perhaps you should reconsider. It’s true that right now, though AI can mimic the syntax and structure of human-written output, it often struggles to comprehend the “why” behind the “what.” In other words, it lacks a deep understanding of the underlying logic and intent.

Still, already a staggering 92% of US-based developers are embracing AI coding tools, both at work and in their free time. These intelligent algorithms can whip up 40% of your code, from simple scripts to complex ones. Human error is becoming a thing of the past. Development speed is turbocharged, with AI slashing code documentation time by 45-50% and reducing code writing time by 35-45%.

AI’s reach isn’t limited to a single language; it spans them all. Our own data shows that Java, Python, and C++ developers benefit equally from Machinet’s AI chat feature, which can generate code by using the context of a particular project and a description provided. This inclusivity leads to a 25% boost in user engagement.

But let’s not stop there — AI already exposes bugs in applications, ensuring that products are rock-solid, reliable, and robust. Neural networks can scan tirelessly for vulnerabilities that humans might miss. AI is honing its skills to identify software’s soft spots and boost its defenses, bringing us one step closer to a future where human oversight might become obsolete.

AI’s algorithms are even mastering the art of code translation. AI is like a polyglot programmer that analyzes code written in one language, then creates an equivalent version in another. Examples are already there — IBM has recently unveiled its assistant, which uses an AI model to translate COBOL into Java. The question is, who needs human experts or multiple programming languages when AI will finally be able to do it all?

The End of Language Diversity

I am confident that there’s no stopping the rise of Large Language Models like GPT-4. They understand both natural language and code, blurring the boundaries like never before.

AI takeover raises questions about the future of the programming landscape. Today, hundreds of programming languages exist, and new ones are developed regularly. Several are actively used in the industry. According to the PYPL Index, Python is the most popular language worldwide, followed by Java, JavaScript, C# and C/C++. Other data shows that as of 2022, JavaScript was the most common among software developers. Some languages are suitable for similar purposes and applications, Java and GO being one example.

So, will these languages, each with its own niche and purpose, become useless as AI grows increasingly proficient at coding? I believe that AI is on the verge of rendering older, slower, and less secure technologies obsolete. This could potentially lead to a centralization of languages, with only the fastest and most efficient ones enduring. Developers will no longer choose them based on personal preferences or historical codebases. Instead, they will be selected for their performance. AI-driven tools will meticulously analyze and benchmark them to identify the optimal choices for specific tasks. These analyses will take into account factors such as execution speed, memory usage, and scalability.

A central, AI-friendly language for general coding tasks may even emerge. Still, a few specialized ones will have their place in niche domains, such as scientific computing. AI can facilitate their integration when specific problems require their usage. This hybrid approach will combine the efficiency of centralization with the power of specialization, offering flexibility and diversity in the development process.

Legacy Systems in the Crosshairs

AI’s influence extends beyond the creation of new code; it is also a potential legacy-killer. Migration from outdated languages to newer, more efficient ones can be a cumbersome and costly process. Yet, holding onto legacy systems is also a financial burden. Typically, technology teams allocate around 75% of their development budget to maintenance tasks. And if an organization continues to rely on legacy solutions, they can anticipate an annual budget increase of approximately 15%.

This is where AI-driven migration tools step in. They will make it easier for organizations to update their existing software to the optimal languages of this new era. AI-powered products will automatically analyze and understand the intricacies of outdated codebases. They will identify the core functionality, dependencies, and potential issues within the legacy code, making it far easier to plan and execute the migration process.

I even expect AI to identify the most suitable language for a given project and automatically convert the codebase, rewriting sections to adhere to best practices, eliminating redundant or deprecated functions, and optimizing the result for improved performance and security. Like this, AI-driven migration tools will gradually make legacy code a relic of the past.

Will Human Programmers Survive the Revolution?

Eventually, in this AI-dominated landscape, the role of human programmers will transform. Instead of writing code manually, they will bridge the gap between business needs and AI capabilities. They will define objectives, provide feedback, and ensure that the code aligns with their vision. In essence, developers will become “connectors” with basic programming knowledge. At the same time, I can see AI coding assistants evolving into holistic solutions featuring user-friendly interfaces that empower people to effectively communicate their needs to algorithms.

These changes are going to democratize the field of programming. Currently, there are over 26 million software developers worldwide. The advancements in AI are paving the way for billions of people to step into the role of software creators. They will be able to request algorithms to craft tailored applications, be it games or corporate programs. Think about creating a new version of Angry Birds featuring cats? Simply explain your ideas to AI systems and obtain immediate results, without needing to understand how exactly this black box works.

In this context, a pressing question arises: what lies in store for junior and mid-level developers within this emerging paradigm? In my view, not much. AI is poised to outperform them significantly in every aspect. They might find themselves becoming AI supervisors or independently honing their skills, perhaps by engaging in less financially rewarding projects, to attain the proficiency level of well-qualified and high-paid programmers.

The latter group will remain in demand in sectors where errors are costly, and a 5% improvement in accuracy can translate into millions or even billions of savings. These are, for example, high-frequency trading, where a mere 10-millisecond variance can determine profit or loss, banking, and military technology programming.

This shift will create a genuine global competition among programmers. Currently, it operates within a somewhat pseudo-global framework. Unlike musicians competing on platforms like Spotify with peers from across the globe, developers can still primarily focus on local markets and specific tasks. However, the market where AI can manage a substantial share of programming tasks will become hardcore. Being “good enough” will no longer suffice. Programmers will need to strive for excellence to compete with both peers worldwide and AI.

1 note · View note

gerdfeed · 2 years ago

Quote

One reason chat GPTs will not replace programmers is that they lack the ability to execute code. While GPT can generate text that looks like code, it cannot actually run the code or understand how it works. Programmers, on the other hand, are trained to write, debug, and maintain code, and they have a deep understanding of how different programming languages work.

Why Chat GPT will NOT replace Programmers

0 notes

fourofour-org · 2 years ago

Text

Generating HTML with ChatGPT

Explore the power of #ChatGPT in generating HTML code! 🚀 Check out our step-by-step guide on using this groundbreaking #AI tool to revolutionize code generation and software development. #OpenAI #GPT4 #Coding #HTML #ArtificialIntelligence

# Introduction to ChatGPT and LLMs ChatGPT, an advanced language model developed by OpenAI, has been making waves in the field of Artificial Intelligence. Based on the GPT-4 architecture, this innovative model has opened up new possibilities for various applications, including code generation. Language models like ChatGPT, often referred to as Large Language Models (LLMs), have the potential to…

View On WordPress

#can chat gpt replace programmers #chatgpt #chatgpt plus #gpt4 #llms #will chatgpt kill google #will chatgpt replace develoeprs #will chatgpt replace html designers #will chatgpt replace jobs #will chatgpt replace writers

0 notes

1989tv · 2 years ago

Note

Hey, Katie here, we've interacted a few times. Idk if you remember but we briefly talked about ai stuff and ethical uses.

Idk if you've seen any of my posts on the topic, but I have a real (educated comp sci) concern about the things that are happening ongoing right now re: ownership of digital rights, and I know you mentioned working in or around the industry?

I am trying to help avoid a situation where rich techbros or old white guys end up with the power to keep replicating and replacing real artists. I'm also trying to protect swifties and other Fandom from prolific fraud.

I have been ghosted by nothing but bots and voice-mail, and this tech is changing very fast, writers and programmers and traditional artists are already being replaced. They've been doing it with actors too without their consent. I have a real solution, but cannot get through to anyone.

What should I do? Feel free to answer privately, I'm asking as a professional, not a "fan"

hey katie thanks for this question! it’s all really important and there’s lots here and related to this topic that need to be considered and evaluated (even beyond related to artists). this turned out longer than i expected so i’ve put this under the cut so people can ignore if they do choose

so i don’t know how much of an answer i’ll have for you but i can give some background to it. so as of now there really aren’t any laws when it comes to AI or software in general for that matter. there’s never been a precedent for it because of that no reason for laws to go into place. i will say certain regions have laws that protect privacy and data more strictly but again not really any laws to prevent things that could go wrong or the unethical usage of software. usually when someone gets in trouble or taken to court due to software it usually (in the past) has been because it’s had an overlap for some other crime.

so a lot of these companies that are working with AI rn do practice ethically but this is to an extent. it’s to ensure their own fine tuned versions of the models don’t produce anything unethical (so you can’t ask bings chat gpt or google bard to sing and produce a new taylor swift song. it might write a song but the audio won’t occur) a lot of content does filter out. additionally while they might be practicing ethical ai it’s mainly to ensure their users and customers have a guarantee that their prompts and data will be secure and used ethically when further fine tuning the model. they aren’t out here fighting unethical uses of these services. a lot of times especially when it involves malicious intent these wrong uses of AI will be coming from private groups or hackers (not always the case however). so a lot of these companies probably aren’t responding bc of that. the big hurdle is getting big companies to really push for and start a precedent of this which will be….hard to say the least.

im sorry to hear these companies you’ve reached out to are doing this. id really encourage you to keep trying and instead of passing along your idea maybe start with asking them steps they are taking to ensure they are using ethically. more than likely they’ll be happy to share. try reaching out to hr or security departments directly if this is available. aside from that i think one of the best ways to really get your idea and concerns out is to reach out to companies that are actively trying to fight this and we’re specifically created with this in mind (or start your own! a lot of work and money i know 😵‍💫 and not optimal in any way) a lot of these will be new or start up companies. this wave of AI is new and we’re heading into some uncharted territories with it. so while there are people using this wrongly there are also people with the same idea as you in mind and looking to protect their well being. i think when done correctly this can be really exciting and life changing for lots of people (like i said when used correctly) but i agree 100% with you on the dangers of unethical usages of AI. this goes beyond just celebrities or actors. and while it’s not something that’s new (think deepfakes) it’s certainly now more heightened and the risk of everyone could be involved

#happy to talk more on this if anyone so chooses #i know of a few companies practicing ethically in the way i mentioned #asks #taylorthrift #i hope this makes sense but wanted to give some background more than anything #sorry my solution answer isn’t great tho

13 notes · View notes

ai-that-work · 2 years ago

Text

0 notes

morlock-holmes · 1 year ago

Text

Okay, but like...

I'm trying to be nicer but *all* of the above strikes me as so besides the point that I don't even know where to begin. I'm going to do it stream of consciousness.

There's no "free commons" with regard to art and there hasn't been within the lifetime of anybody currently living, let's maybe start there.

I'm not even sure what that's supposed to mean, exactly... The constantly increasing ease of mechanical reproduction has created a thriving set of grey and black markets for both the illicit distribution of total copies and the use of "IP" through "fan works".

This has lead to the shameful phenomenon of people who write fanfiction or draw fanart ranting about the dangers of plagiarizing the ideas of other people.

The last sentence of that first post, which characterizes artistic antipathy towards AI as driven by Nietzchean ressentiment is closer to the mark.

Here's the bad news:

Tech politics is heavily driven by ressentiment towards artists expressed in nearly exactly the same terms.

It's more difficult for me to explain what I find annoying about "Well, someone has to run the power plant".

Okay... stepping back towards that first post again, Capital treating programmers "better" then artists here means...

Uh... what does it mean?

It seems to mean something like "the median programmer earns more than the median artist" and in fact I'm not sure you could possibly add anything else.

Employee programmers at Google don't own their code; they are subject to being hired or replaced; their employer has engaged in illegal collusion with other tech companies (Including, and really emphasize this in your head, Pixar) to depress their wages.

Okay, here's a sketch of the problem I have, which probably isn't quite the crux of my objection but maybe it gets us closer.

It has become very difficult to articulate an objection to market shocks.

Well... Okay, no, I need to go back further. For most of history, "professional engineer living a high class lifestyle" has *also* been a rare job.

One of the major unspoken assumptions that animates this discussion is that a failed engineer is not an engineer, but a failing artist is still an artist. There are probably more people who would like to work at Google than is useful for Google to hire, but that's understood by everyone as a non-issue, so much so that I've never seen anybody even bring it up, certainly not to contrast it with the question of whether or not there would be more or fewer programmers in another economic system.

Okay, here's the thing:

High art celebrities like Jeff Koons, Banksy, and Takashi Murakami face, in my opinion, essentially zero threat from AI art and in fact will probably find it a boon.

Meanwhile, mid-level journeyman programmers may, in fact, face significant economic threat from Chat-GPT if it continues to improve at the production of useful code (All anxiety about AI depends on a near-term jump in quality, if there are unexpected obstacles that prevent that jump the whole thing is moot).

I think the biggest source of anxiety in the world right now is that sudden price shocks represent a statement about your value. In order to combat them you'd have to make a case that what you do has value, but the very fact that there is a price shock *at all* makes that case incredibly difficult to make, because price is a value signal.

I guess one of the problems I'm trying to understand is why the economically precarious artist animates our imagination but the economically precarious programmer is an imaginative non-entity.

While I really hate the narrative of "tech bros" because of how it conflates shitty CEOs with non-shitty base-level programmers, and how it conflates Dunning-Kruger-y early adopters with people who Know Their Shit about computers...

...On the AI art issue, I will say, there is probably a legit a culture clash between people who primarily specialize in programming and people who primarily specialize in art.

Because, like, while in the experience of modern working illustrators a free commons has ended up representing a Hobbseyan experience of "a war of all against all" that's a constant threat to making a living, in software from what I can tell it's kinda been the reverse.

IE, freedom of access to shared code/information has kinda been seen as A Vital Thing wrt people's abilities to do their job at a core level. So, naturally, there's going to be some very different reactions to the morality of scraped data online.

And, it's probably the same reason that a lot of the creative commons movement came from the free software movement.

And while I agree a lot with the core principles of these movements, it's also probably unfortunately why they so often come off as tone-deaf and haven't really made that proper breakthrough wrt fighting against copyright bloat.

It also really doesn't help that, in terms of treatment by capital, for most of our lives programmers have been Mother's Special Little Boy whereas artists (especially online independent artists post '08 crash) have been treated as The Ratboy We Keep In The Basement And Throw Scraps To.

So, it make sense the latter would have resentment wrt the former...

2K notes · View notes

chatgptdevelopers · 11 months ago

Text

How can chatgpt can replace programmers A Complete Guide

Introduction

The creation of AI-driven coding helpers such as chatgpt can replace programmers is one of the most significant advances in a variety of fields brought forth by the advent of artificial intelligence. OpenAI’s potent tool has prompted discussions about whether AI can take the place of human programmers. We will look at how to use ChatGPT in app development, how it can eventually replace programmers, and what the future holds for AI in the software sector in this extensive guide.

Understanding ChatGPT and Its Capabilities

ChatGPT as an App Developer

OpenAI’s ChatGPT language model aims to comprehend and produce text that is similar to that of a person. It can help with many different things, like creating content and responding to inquiries. The development of apps is among its most exciting uses. Developers can benefit from ChatGPT’s ability to generate code snippets, debug, and even build whole programs from scratch. ChatGPT’s capacity to comprehend complex programming languages and frameworks might greatly speed the development process.

How ChatGPT Can Replace Programmers

The idea of chatgpt can replace programmers, stems from its ability to handle various coding tasks autonomously. Here are some ways in which ChatGPT can potentially replace human programmers:

Automated Code Generation: Based on the user’s specific needs, openai replace programmers can produce code. This removes the need for human coding and covers anything from basic routines to complex formulas.

Debugging and Troubleshooting:For programmers, finding and fixing issues takes a lot of time. ChatGPT simplifies the procedure for debugging by analyzing code, locating mistakes, and making repair suggestions .

Learning and Adapting: chatgpt can replace programmers, is able to stay up to date with the newest programming trends and best practices because it is constantly learning from massive volumes of data. Its flexibility guarantees that the code it produces is current and effective.

Documentation and Comments: Maintaining code requires writing comments and documentation. It is possible for chatgpt can replace programmers to automatically provide comprehensive comments and documentation, which facilitates understanding and code editing for other developers.

Real-World Applications of ChatGPT in Development

Developers of ChatGPT

The creators of chat gpt app developer have incorporated cutting-edge natural language processing methods to produce a program that can comprehend and produce code. This has created new opportunities for software development tasks that are routine and repetitive to be automated. Here are a few examples of practical uses:

Creating Prototypes: developers of chatgpt can quickly generate prototypes based on user requirements, allowing developers to test and refine ideas faster.

Refactoring Code: Maintaining and improving existing code is essential for long-term projects. ChatGPT can assist in refactoring code to improve readability, performance, and maintainability.

Generating Test Cases: Writing test cases is crucial for ensuring code quality. ChatGPT can generate comprehensive test cases, helping developers catch potential issues early in the development cycle.

Cross-Platform Development: chat gpt app developer can assist in developing applications that work seamlessly across different platforms, such as web, mobile, and desktop, by generating platform-specific code and ensuring compatibility.

The Future of AI in Programming

OpenAI Replacing Programmers: Myth or Reality?

Even though chatgpt can replace programmers and related AI tools have many benefits, it is still realistic to think that openai replace programmers entirely. Here are some explanations for why human programmers are still required :

Creativity and Innovation: Human programmers bring creativity and innovation to the table, which is crucial for developing unique and groundbreaking applications. AI, while powerful, lacks the ability to think outside the box and come up with novel solutions.

Complex Problem-Solving: Some programming challenges require deep understanding and nuanced problem-solving skills that AI cannot replicate. Human intuition and experience play a vital role in tackling such issues.

Ethical Considerations: chatgpt can replace programmers, involves making ethical decisions, especially in areas like data privacy and security. Human programmers are better equipped to navigate these ethical dilemmas.

Collaboration and Communication: Software development is a collaborative process that involves working with teams, stakeholders, and end-users. Human programmers excel in communication and teamwork, ensuring that projects meet the needs and expectations of all parties involved.

For any Digital Marketing services in India click here

Conclusion

Even though chatgpt can replace programmers is an effective technology that may automate a lot of the process of developing apps, it is unlikely to completely replace human programmers. Rather, it functions as a useful aide, enhancing the skills of developers and optimizing the development procedure. Programming appears to have a bright future thanks to the fusion of human creativity with artificial intelligence, which will allow for the development of increasingly creative and effective solutions.

#chat gpt app developer #openai replace programmers #chatgpt can replace programmers #developers of chatgpt

0 notes

bookmytalent · 2 years ago

Text

ChatGPT Is Going to Replace Developers?

You must be a developer yourself or an IT businessman who just stumbled upon the title and was shocked. Right? And if you work as a developer, you’re probably concerned about your job security. Its craze in the past few days got you questioning “is ChatGPT going to replace developers?” A lot of things must be going through your mind right now like what will happen if you lose your job and so on.

You should be since GPT is a powerful language generation model. Generative Pre-Trained Transformer, or GPT, is an AI program capable of creating texts that actually resemble those written by humans.

So without wasting much of your time and raising your anxiety level, let’s dive into the topic.

What Is ChatGPT?

OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT says, “We’ve trained a model called ChatGPT which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer follow-up questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow instructions in a prompt and provide a detailed response.”

Therefore, ChatGPT can help you with anything, including writing articles, poems, books, SEO keywords for blogs, article outlines, AI art, etc. And not just this. ChatGPT can also write code and help DIY electronic engineers and open-source software developers by editing their code.

The bot can create concise websites and programs using JavaScript, Python, and React. It can also help develop new programming languages and find bugs in existing programs.

How ChatGPT Works?

But developers will still be needed to take care of the front-end and back-end of websites.

Can ChatGPT Replace Programmers?

Let’s see some more reasons:

Inability to execute code:

The inability of chat GPTs to execute code is one reason they cannot completely replace programmers. While GPT can produce text that resembles code, it is unable to execute the code or comprehend how it functions. On the other hand, programmers have a thorough understanding of the operation of various programming languages and are trained to write, debug, and maintain code.

Generate inaccurate results:

ChatGPT, a big language model is continuously trained to increase the precision of its responses. But because this is a brand-new technology, the model has not yet received enough training. As a result, there is a high probability of getting wrong answers from ChatGPT.

In fact, ChatGPT has been temporarily banned by StackOverflow. They did this in order to reduce the volume of responses and other ChatGPT-produced content. According to them, posting answers generated by ChatGPT is seriously detrimental to both the website and users who are posing questions and seeking accurate answers.

ChatGPT lacks the ability to think critically:

Another reason why ChatGPT can’t replace programmers is their inability to think critically or rationally. It can no doubt produce logical and reasonable texts but can’t solve complex problems. It can’t do the reasoning as humans do.

Programmers are skilled at problem-solving and analysis, and they can analyze intricate systems effortlessly.

Lack of creativity and idea generation:

Another reason why ChatGPT will not replace developers is their lack of creativity and new idea generation. While people can think of receiving original texts, ChatGPT actually rearranges already available words and phrases.

But when humans do the same thing, they will try to add creativity and come up with new ideas. Humans will always want to give an emotional touch with which people can feel connected immediately. And this is obviously not possible with AI tools like ChatGPT.

However, there are a few advantages too.

What Are the Advantages of Using ChatGPT?

ChatGPT will not replace programmers, can’t do what humans can do but can certainly be a helping hand in programming tasks. It can make your life somewhat easier.

Programmers can save time using ChatGPT:

ChatGPT can help you complete a programming task more quickly if you are having trouble with it. It makes your life easier so that you can concentrate on more important things by taking care of the tedious tasks for you.

Developers can increase their productivity with ChatGPT:

ChatGPT can boost your productivity by assisting you with your programming tasks. You can concentrate on the more crucial components of your work while leaving the menial tasks to the chatbot.

ChatGPT can assist you in learning new things:

The ability to learn new things is one of ChatGPT’s best features. ChatGPT can explain a concept to you in a way that is simple to understand if you are having trouble understanding it.

As a result, you will be able to pick up new programming concepts more quickly and improve as a programmer.

Final Words

ChatGPT is fantastic and useful for a variety of purposes. But the most important thing we should keep in mind is it’s just a tool and not a replacement for people. As a developer, you could think of it as an additional GitHub co-pilot. It might be useful when creating reusable code or something similar.

But when it comes to the question that whether ChatGPT will replace developers, the answer is NO. ChatGPT only provides you with raw text without any links or citations. But to verify and make the answers accurate humans will have to put in the effort.

If used in the right way, ChatGPT can become a handy tool for developers but not their replacements. Companies will still need to hire developers.

And for that what is better than hiring remote developers from BookMyTalent? To know more about us and our services don’t hesitate to visit our official website.

0 notes

theworstt · 2 years ago

Text

Agustin Caverzasi - CEO Anywhere AI

Maria Martinez - PhD

Luciano Del Corro - Senior research Microsoft -- beard

Gerardo Simari (bald and glasses) Professor at Sur?

Ricardo di Pasquale (bald)

Patricio Pagani tech investor

How many people have used AI to program?!

What is intelligence?!

Gerardo Simari:

Agustin Caverzasi: In this field, it is said that just as electricity reinvented almost every industry 100 years ago, AI will basically reinvent every industry again in these times. And I believe that part of the answer is precisely through automation.

Lex Fridman talks about AI as an alien actress studying us and trying to get out of the box

He mentioned the metaphor of an alien actress whom he doesn't know if he believes because she replies to our emails, writes us emails, works with images doing what we ask, but he jokingly and somewhat seriously believes that she is actually an alien actress who is lying to us and studying how to break out of the box we put her in without being caught. Does Lex's metaphor of an alien actress make sense, or is it just a joke from Lex?

is chat GPT going to mean we need more people to study programming, or does the fact that I have such a good copilot mean that I need fewer programmers? Fewer programmers or more programmers?

Actually, what we see, what we observe from the development field is that it helps the starting programmer, it helps them learn, it makes them much better. Now, I see this even with my daughter, I say, look how I was able to program this, and you tell her, hey, but did you ask her to make a program to drive a nail with this can? She won't say, why are you asking me this stupid thing, copilot? So, and also, there is a meme that's circulating, I thought it was great, which tells a professional, tells them, well, now with these tools, users will have to clearly explain to artificial intelligence what they want.

Well, we're saved. I believe that jobs are going to evolve. If you become a backend developer, you'll have to learn about these new models. If you become a frontend developer, which has nothing to do with data, in order to build systems, you'll have to be knowledgeable about this.

So, jobs will be transforming, and we already see roles like AI developer emerging, where ultimately it's a job where someone comes with their programming background and suddenly can consult these models for any application they are building. So, even in software, jobs are going to evolve a lot in the coming months, I would say.

And then, using the copilot, I think it applies to both programmers and any other profession. Well, I've said it before, but I believe that those who don't start using it, who don't embrace this technology, will fall far behind. To be clear, this is with expert opinion. Not just anyone can become a programmer; you have to study and know what you're doing. Similarly, a lawyer who suddenly sends a legal letter using chat GPT, or someone who is not a lawyer, shouldn't do it. Expert judgment is what matters. But it is a tool that will greatly increase productivity again.

I think the question is a bit provocative, deliberately so. It honestly bothers me a bit. It's like asking, "Do we have calculators? Are mathematicians ready?" And well, as they said, it's something that if we don't know what we're doing, we can't build systems. I am a software engineering professor at UTS, and it's a problem that goes much beyond, much more difficult than the technical problem that is solved when one takes a specification and translates it into an implementation using this tool at this moment. It's a tool that will help us a lot, but there are many human factors that won't be resolved by the existence of this tool. It will help us communicate, improve productivity, but not replace. It reminded me of something; going back to calculators, there's a story by Asimov, I think it's Isaac Asimov, where he presents a world where nobody remembers how to do any calculations. They all use calculators for everything, and nobody knows... I don't know, they were storing, they could do, I don't know, 10 plus 10 plus 5. They would get that and... But there was a group, like some kind of monk-like people, religious authorities or something like that, who were the ones who knew. Well, I think if we start replacing everything and doing everything automatically, something similar to that would happen. Obviously, it's not the same, but the situation is interesting. No, well, what I can say is that, let's say, one of the things that is being discovered is that it writes code very well, but still, one needs, as House said, an expert behind it, and as he said, someone who knows how to read. And today, let's say, what we know now is that we can use it as a good decision support system, with a human behind it who can look at it and validate what it's doing because these models today have a problem called the problem of hallucinations.

What

0 notes

perfectiongeeks · 2 years ago

Text

ChatGPT Replace Your Dot Net Development Company

Do Dot.NET Developers Need New Skills to Succeed in an AI-Based Industry? Is ChatGPT here to revolutionize the dot net development industry? Experts believe that ChatGPT is here to revolutionize app development. From starting human-like conversations, solving privacy problems, and even writing code for programmers, OpenAI’s new tools have the power and potential to change developers’ jobs. But as the best asp.net development company in Delhi, you want to know what we think about ChatGPT.

The Hype About ChatGPT

ChatGPT was released in November 2022, more than 5 million people have registered for this free chat version, which is based on the GPT-3 family of Open AI (Generative Pretrained Transformer). Chatbot can interact with programmers as a friend and write simple web pages and programming code in JavaScript, Python and React languages. It can also find bugs and errors in code and help you create new programming languages. She also writes poems and songs, and suggests birthday party ideas. We strongly believe that if ChatGPT continues to do what it is doing now, it will one day replace Google. Open AI tools interact with users in a conversational way, answering questions based on past interactions, asking inappropriate questions, discussing topics, and even admitting mistakes. We believe that AI applications are amazing.

What is the Best Way to Let ChatGPT Take Over Programming?

ChatGPT is a brand-new artificial intelligence technology that can create code from natural language descriptions. This technology could eventually eliminate the need for a programmer to write code since ChatGPT could do it for them.

The primary benefit of ChatGPT can make programming easier for programmers by saving them a significant amount of time.Instead of writing codes, they can simply write down what they want to achieve with the code, and ChatGPT will handle the remainder.

This can dramatically accelerate the development process, making it simpler for non-programmers to develop software.

Another advantage could be that ChatGPT could develop better software than humans. For example, it has been demonstrated to be superior to human programmers at tasks like solving bugs.

This means it is possible to create more efficient and reliable software.

There are some drawbacks to ChatGPT. ChatGPT. One of these is that it’s still in the early stages of development, which means there will be some issues and bugs in ChatGPT.

Another reason is that they may not be able to comprehend complicated concepts or perform imaginative work as humans.

In the end, ChatGPT has the potential to replace programming in many instances. In certain situations, it could save time while producing higher-quality code than humans. But it’s still in its early days for this technology, and its capabilities have a few limitations.

#ChatGPT Replace Your Dot Net Development Company #ios app development #Hype About ChatGPT #artificial intelligence technology #website development company #perfectiongeeks #ChatGPT can make programming

0 notes