#chatGpt programmers

[creolestudios]

Choose Creole Studios for ChatGPT Development: Opt for Creole Studios on DevelopersForHire.com for expert ChatGPT development. Elevate your projects with our renowned app development expertise.

[exteenpopstar]

Good Morning We Are Valiantly Attempting to Be A Human Person Today

[nixcraft]

Q: What do you call a GPT model trained only on 4Chan? A: Degenerative AI

[admecmultimedia6]

ChatGPT vs DeepSeek: An Inclusive Comparison

Although both are AI-generated tools. Everyone already knows that ChatGPT is mostly used for conversational works whereas DeepSeek is used for data analysis, Btw it is new, it is currently being launched in China. So let's see ChatGPT vs DeepSeek: An Inclusive Comparison throughout this Blog.

[luvquita]

I am honestly stuck in chatgpt's grasp..

I am not gonna make this course my career istg 😭😭😭 i am stuck relying on chatgpt.

[ilgattopatata]

this bot knows jackshit of the play i'm asking about lmao

[sarcasticsparkles]

This brings me psychic damage in ways I could not possibly hope to describe. There are no words to properly convey the sheer frustration, so I am going to explain this from a perspective on the consequences of this.

My parents and I are my younger sister's English teachers.

The reason? Because her school developed such a problem with students using ChatGPT that they taught accordingly, in that they didn't teach at all. The rare time there was an attempt to properly teach, most students had no ability to think critically to the point being in a room with them was actively endangering the neurons of everyone around them. We needed to pull my sister out of English class because she simply was not learning despite her best efforts.

Being a teacher is not my field, but I have been writing since I was a preteen, and I am now an adult woman. Teaching a teenager to engage with media critically and write essays is not an easy task. The only thing maintaining my sanity is knowing my sister is a good kid and I've never had an issue of ChatGPT with her. But it has brought forward an interesting question a lot of students are faced with:

Why bother? What is the point of trying when the class moron with the broccoli hair and a singular braincell bouncing around in his head like a windows screensaver could get the same grade with the click of a button?

Removing my sister from a class of her peers was monumental in removing this argument, but not every student has family willing or able to aid them. It's a fascinating discussion and a depressing one.

When I was in school, there was an art to violating academic integrity. Some skill had to be learned to guarantee not being caught. There were obviously kids stupid enough to plagiarize an entire essay often from the first result on the first page of google. Or my favorite example of my classmate googling the answers to our trade school final exam on the school tablet, during the exam, with the google typing sound loudly on for all to hear. But the existence of those students was rarely harming anyone. If the assignment they cheated on was important to their future, they only harmed themselves, and if it was useless busywork, it's a victimless crime.

Furthermore, I've asked people what assignments they would cheat on, if any. Some people admitted to cheating on tests and such, as expected, but a lot of it was in situations where a teacher refused to respect their time. Meaningless busywork, designed for nothing more than to guarantee the student didn't sleep or have a life outside of school. If a teacher won't respect the students, why respect them by actually doing the pointless assignment?

(I need to clarify cheating on busywork means assignments like a math teacher giving a 26 question assignment each with multiple lettered sub-questions, none of which is going to appear on the test, and refusing to let students use a calculator. The type of assignment that in a creative setting would simply mean half-assing it.)

ChatGPT has not just blurred but outright decimated the line in the sand on what is busywork and what are assignments meant to help further the learning. Every assignment feels meaningless when it's common knowledge half the class spent 30 seconds on the work, if that. Every minute working on that important essay feels like time that could be spent on better things, and the question is raised why the teacher ever assigned it.

Why should a student waste hours of their time for something they know will mean nothing, and did mean nothing to so many who will get the same result as their hard work?

All ChatGPT has done is reduce critical thinking and writing ability on a massive scale, and destroy morale to create at all. There is something to be said in the context of the education system about failings that cause every aspect of learning to feel pointless in relation to the real world, but that has always been a problem, just as cheating has always been a problem. ChatGPT is a new ball game, and its effect on anyone it touches, even if indirectly, are catastrophic.

As a tidbit for any teacher or parent who may see this, the best way to confirm if ChatGPT was used in instances they don't accidentally leave in the "this was made by ChatGPT" blip is to ask the student to define the words in their essay. More often than not, they cannot pronounce or spell the word without a computer, let alone define it.

[chatgptdevelopers]

Chat GPT for Developers: Mastering Advanced Techniques to Enhance User Engagement and Interaction

https://chatgpt-developers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/chat-gpt-developer-1.jpg

Understanding Chat GPT

Chat GPT for Developers, short for Generative Pre-trained Transformer, is an AI model developed by OpenAI that leverages deep learning techniques to generate text-based responses. Trained on vast amounts of text data, Chat GPT for Developers has learned to mimic human language patterns and respond contextually to user inputs. This makes it particularly effective in chatbot development, customer service automation, content generation, and more.

Mastering Advanced Techniques with Chat GPT for Developers  

As developers delve into the realm of Chat GPT for Developers, mastering advanced techniques becomes crucial to maximize its potential. Here are key strategies and practices that developers can employ:

1. Fine-tuning Models: While pre-trained models like ChatGPT come with a solid foundation, fine-tuning allows chatgpt programmers to tailor responses to specific contexts or domains. By training on domain-specific datasets, developers can improve accuracy and relevance, ensuring more meaningful interactions with users.

2. Handling Context: One of Chat GPT’s strengths lies in its ability to maintain context across conversations. Developers can implement techniques such as context windowing and history handling to enhance continuity and coherence in dialogues. This ensures smoother interactions and a more human-like experience for users.

3. Multi-turn Conversations: For chat GPT app developers, enabling Chat GPT to handle multi-turn conversations involves managing dialogue state and tracking user intents over successive interactions. Techniques like state management systems and dialogue managers empower developers to create chatbots capable of sustaining meaningful exchanges over time.

4. Natural Language Understanding (NLU): Integrating robust NLU capabilities with Chat GPT enhances its comprehension of user inputs. Techniques such as entity recognition, sentiment analysis, and intent classification enable more accurate and context-aware responses, improving overall user satisfaction.

5. Scaling and Optimization: As applications grow in complexity and user base, scaling Chat GPT models becomes essential. Developers can leverage cloud computing platforms and distributed training techniques to handle larger workloads and ensure optimal performance across different devices and platforms.

Enhancing User Engagement and Interaction

The primary goal of leveraging Chat GPT for Developers in application development is to enhance user engagement and interaction. By implementing advanced techniques effectively, developers can achieve the following benefits:

Improved Responsiveness: Chat GPT enables real-time responses to user queries, reducing wait times and enhancing user satisfaction.

Personalized Experiences: Through fine-tuning and context management, developers can tailor interactions based on user preferences and historical data, delivering personalized experiences.

Scalability and Efficiency: Optimized Chat GPT models ensure that applications remain responsive and efficient, even as user traffic increases.

Enhanced User Retention: By creating engaging and seamless interactions, applications powered by Chat GPT can increase user retention and loyalty over time.

For any Digital Marketing services in India click here

Conclusion

In conclusion, Chat GPT for Developers stands as a powerful enabler for crafting intelligent and engaging applications. By mastering advanced techniques like model fine-tuning, context management, and seamless NLU integration, developers can fully leverage the capabilities of Chat GPT to deliver unparalleled user experiences. Looking forward, the pivotal role of Chat GPT in shaping the future of digital communication is undeniable. Openai replace programmers or may be automated or augmented by advanced AI systems. This evolution promises to revolutionize software development by enhancing efficiency, scalability, and the potential for creative exploration in the field. By embracing its potential and pushing the boundaries of what’s achievable, developers can pave the way for tomorrow’s applications with more intuitive, responsive, and human-like interactions.

[eunhos]

.

[obsessedkuroi]

My fiance, when it first got popular, asked chatgpt dnd questions only to find out it couldn't actually give him the right answer. He then spent two days dragging chatgpt for providing wrong answers every time in the bluntest language and I almost felt bad for a horrible AI brain drain program.

He hasn't touched it since he got his fix.

"I know chatgpt is bad but you just don't really have any choice" you literally do. Don't use it. Have some moral backbone.

[aphisit0]

Effective-Use-Of-Premium-Writer

Effective-Use-Of-Premium-Writer Mastering The Use of a Premium Writer As a Premium Writer, I am here to assist you in creating high-quality, engaging written content. Below are some methods to use a Premium Writer effectively, along with tips for crafting ideal prompts for impressive articles. How to Use Premium Writer Effectively 1. Specific Instructions: For the best results, be as specific as…

[shaveyoureyebrows]

A short comic on AI art 🫃🫃🫃🫃🫃🫃🫃🫃🫃🫃 If any AI bros are reading this you better watch yourselves 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈

This is probably a very predictable take but I think new-age AI (ChatGPT, Character AI, Gen AI, etc) is an absolute scourge in every possible way. As a programmer, it's impressive in terms of software but should have absolutely NEVER been released to the public for use lmao (or even released for use at all, considering the negative impact it's had on education, job losses, misinformation, the environment, etc)

[feminist-space]

"Balaji’s death comes three months after he publicly accused OpenAI of violating U.S. copyright law while developing ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence program that has become a moneymaking sensation used by hundreds of millions of people across the world.

Its public release in late 2022 spurred a torrent of lawsuits against OpenAI from authors, computer programmers and journalists, who say the company illegally stole their copyrighted material to train its program and elevate its value past $150 billion.

The Mercury News and seven sister news outlets are among several newspapers, including the New York Times, to sue OpenAI in the past year.

In an interview with the New York Times published Oct. 23, Balaji argued OpenAI was harming businesses and entrepreneurs whose data were used to train ChatGPT.

“If you believe what I believe, you have to just leave the company,” he told the outlet, adding that “this is not a sustainable model for the internet ecosystem as a whole.”

Balaji grew up in Cupertino before attending UC Berkeley to study computer science. It was then he became a believer in the potential benefits that artificial intelligence could offer society, including its ability to cure diseases and stop aging, the Times reported. “I thought we could invent some kind of scientist that could help solve them,” he told the newspaper.

But his outlook began to sour in 2022, two years after joining OpenAI as a researcher. He grew particularly concerned about his assignment of gathering data from the internet for the company’s GPT-4 program, which analyzed text from nearly the entire internet to train its artificial intelligence program, the news outlet reported.

The practice, he told the Times, ran afoul of the country’s “fair use” laws governing how people can use previously published work. In late October, he posted an analysis on his personal website arguing that point.

No known factors “seem to weigh in favor of ChatGPT being a fair use of its training data,” Balaji wrote. “That being said, none of the arguments here are fundamentally specific to ChatGPT either, and similar arguments could be made for many generative AI products in a wide variety of domains.”

Reached by this news agency, Balaji’s mother requested privacy while grieving the death of her son.

In a Nov. 18 letter filed in federal court, attorneys for The New York Times named Balaji as someone who had “unique and relevant documents” that would support their case against OpenAI. He was among at least 12 people — many of them past or present OpenAI employees — the newspaper had named in court filings as having material helpful to their case, ahead of depositions."

[aristoteliancomplacency]

You’re absolutely right that there’s clear hyperbole going on in that tweet thread, but you have to be feeling very uncharitable indeed to claim that the worry of ‘reverting to where AI is’ is an indulgent statement that ‘doesn’t mean anything.’ It’s really very easy to understand what the student meant - the exact meaning is explained within that same tweet (along with how they’re defining ‘dumber’). She is referring to loss of ability / practice in thinking critically.

Given that they’re doing this for an assignment I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re drawing that claim from an article like this. Which certainly makes it sound far less knee-jerk and more like a response which has some logical and calm thought behind it. Concerns about impact on critical thinking skills, it turns out, are indeed a totally legitimate concern to have. (Brain atrophy is another thing, of course, which sounds more like a term first year students might bandy around without fully understanding it).

Of course, you’re fully entitled to your interpretation but on that particular point I’d suggest you’re being as reactionary as you’re an accusing them of being and engaging in a very bad faith interpretation. They’re very, very clearly not talking about AI as a field of study. C’mon.

‘But everyone in my peer group that I know knows way more about this’ is a sentiment that will often be true (or its opposite will be). I am constantly surprised at what, in turns out, most people my age don’t know - or what I don’t know that supposedly most people my age do know. Anecdotal evidence is still just anecdotal evidence, after all. And it’s certainly not enough to extrapolate across an entire country, let alone the globe. And if you’re on tumblr you’re more likely to be Online, and far more likely to be aware of all tech issues. You specified you did an intro to computer science and learnt Java and wrote code for a basic AI: of course your experience is atypical for your generation. Most students don’t do that.

And on the other side of that - this tweet thread is also just one group of students! It’s not evidence that all students - or even the majority - were so unaware of the pitfalls of relying on chatGPT to generate accurate info. But from hearing academics talk about their encounters with students and chatGPT in other places, it’s also not a unique experience.

There’s a lot of discussion about chat GPT among academics. Some have students who understand the issues, are skeptical of it, etc. others have massive issues with plagiarism, with students not understanding how it works, etc. the situation can be so drastically different between different unis (or even departments, or even individual classes tbh). This is absolutely not a unique situation in terms of people reporting how little some of their students understand about chatGPT (and that’s not even getting into the issue of how little many academics themselves understand about it - recall that recent incident what a prof tried to fail a whole class bc he asked chatGPT if it could have generated their essays and somehow took its reply to mean that it had generated them?)

Tl;dr: I agree the language here is very dramatic. I agree privacy should be a big concern (though in this context I can also see why it didn’t come up - it’s not relevant to how accurately chatGPT wrote an essay). I think it’s also very dramatic to suggest that what the students understand now is worse than their previous total ignorance.

[thetexvn]

grokai: elonmusk's New chatbot to Take on chatgpt and Other AI Giants

Read More: https://thetexvn.com/blogs/Grok_AI_Elon_Musks_New_Chatbot_to_Take_on_ChatGPT_and_Other_AI_Giants

[tingvall]

Oh, you like quarternions? Name 5 of their songs.