#disproportionate assets case

[beautifulpersonpeach]

Bpp, what's your take over this Scooter Braun // all his artists leaving // HYBE situation? I just read that HYBE paid $1 trillion USD for Scooter's company to get Ariana Grande and if she leaves that deal is worthless. What do you think?

***

I’m watching this with interest, but I really have no idea what’s actually going on or how it’s going to play out (it’s been 24 hours and reports are still unconfirmed from all parties). Right now the implications here are all negative, obviously, but if it’s in fact true that Ariana Grande is no longer affiliated with Scooter Braun and by extension HYBE America, and Bang PD’s investment is rendered useless as a result, a big part of me would be a bit happy. To be honest with you.

I mean, I’ve felt for a long time that Bang PD’s business moves in recent years have shown an arrogance that’s disproportionate with the results. I’m very curious to know what kind of risk matrix he uses to filter deals and arrive at valuations. Because just like the SM acquisition he was attempting this year, and just like I said back then, Bang PD seems to discount intangible and social costs significantly more than I think is prudent.

Getting into business with disgusting unscrupulous characters, and acquiring businesses with horrible company cultures, doesn’t seem to be a headwind for him going by the fact that he partnered with Scooter and was going to absorb SM Entertainment despite both entities’ long and notorious track record of being bottom barrel filth. To be fair, it’s normal in business to discount reputational risk when evaluating a deal, but Bang PD seems to either have an information disadvantage, or a massive inflated ego to go ahead with certain things he’s done.

It’s why I was so cautious about the SM deal when he was pursuing it. Though acquiring SM made pure business sense looking at the numbers, (the company was basically dirt cheap, many of the synergies were obvious and Bang PD did wisely backstop his fiscal exposure), he seemed to have no idea that acquiring a company like SM would be bad news in every possible way and would likely leave him with more liabilities than assets in the most realistic scenario. Or that he’d end up at par in the best scenario. I mean, imagine if he completed that acquisition and then the CBX - EXO - slave contract news broke, the FSS announced the multiple raids and inquiries on SM that followed, and he still had to comply with American SEC rules.

It would be the clusterfuck of the year. Like, it was bad news every which way you looked at it. The only thing that made me not worry is that at the very least, for SM he’d be paying chicken change relatively.

That’s not the case for his deal with Scooter, and like I’ve been saying, Scooter has always had very limited utility. The only time he proved worth the money was in 2020 and 2021 when he helped facilitate the promotions and distribution for Dynamite and Butter with many of the tools he brought out again for Seven. But in terms of A&R, Nicole did a much better job than anything Scooter has done, and she did it without a $1 trillion *Won acquisition.

When HYBE lost her to Columbia Records in May this year, that gave me pause more than anything else that’s happened so far.

Anyway, Bang PD could use the reality check. If this in fact turns out to be a gaffe, it would be one of the most expensive and embarrassing ones he’s made recently. And a part of me hopes it happens because he’s gotten very comfortable in recent years. Whatever good eye he had to find people like Nicole in the first place, he needs to find it again. The tannies will be fine though. HYBE is so cashed up that even if they lost 50% of their value, they’d still be in better shape than at least two Big 3 companies. Plus soon the boys will be doing the military service and will hopefully be shielded from the worst of the fall-out.

But we’ll see. :)

[gigglystudent]

Mastering Economics Homework: Unveiling Complex Queries and Solutions

Entering the realm of economics, one often encounters challenging questions that demand critical thinking and analytical prowess. As students navigate through their coursework, they may find themselves pondering, Can I pay someone to do my economics homework? While this query reflects a common concern among students, the journey toward mastering economics involves far more than outsourcing assignments. In this blog, we delve into a master level question, providing an insightful answer that illuminates key concepts in economics.

Question: Consider a scenario where a country experiences a sudden increase in its money supply due to monetary policy interventions. Analyze the potential short-term and long-term effects of this increase on key economic variables such as inflation, unemployment, and economic growth.

Answer: The scenario described presents a classic case of the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy actions, particularly focusing on the consequences of an expansionary monetary policy characterized by an increase in the money supply. Let's dissect the potential short-term and long-term effects on key economic variables:

Short-term Effects: In the short term, the injection of additional money into the economy is likely to stimulate aggregate demand. With more money circulating, consumers and businesses may increase spending, leading to a rise in aggregate demand. This surge in demand could have several immediate effects:

Inflationary Pressure: One of the primary short-term effects of an increase in the money supply is the potential for inflationary pressure. As demand outstrips supply in various sectors of the economy, prices may begin to rise. This inflationary effect is driven by the classical quantity theory of money, which posits a direct relationship between the money supply and the price level in the economy.

Decrease in Unemployment: The boost in aggregate demand resulting from the expansionary monetary policy could lead to increased production and hiring by firms to meet the higher levels of demand. As businesses expand operations and hire more workers, unemployment rates may decline in the short run.

Economic Growth: The initial impact of the increase in the money supply is likely to spur economic growth, as higher levels of spending stimulate production and investment. This short-term boost in economic activity can contribute to an uptick in the overall GDP growth rate.

Long-term Effects: While the short-term effects of monetary expansion may seem favorable, it is essential to consider the potential long-term repercussions:

Inflationary Expectations: Persistent increases in the money supply can lead to changes in inflation expectations among households, businesses, and financial markets. If economic agents anticipate continued inflationary pressures, it may influence their behavior, leading to wage-price spirals and further exacerbating inflationary trends.

Resource Misallocation: Over time, prolonged monetary expansion can distort price signals and lead to misallocation of resources in the economy. Excessive money creation may artificially stimulate certain sectors while neglecting others, resulting in inefficiencies and imbalances in resource allocation.

Long-Term Unemployment: While expansionary monetary policy may initially reduce unemployment, sustained inflationary pressures could undermine long-term employment stability. Businesses may become wary of hiring additional workers amid uncertain economic conditions, leading to prolonged periods of unemployment.

Diminished Purchasing Power: Continual inflation erodes the purchasing power of money, reducing the real value of savings and fixed-income assets over time. This erosion in purchasing power can disproportionately affect individuals on fixed incomes, retirees, and low-income households.

In conclusion, the effects of an increase in the money supply due to monetary policy interventions are multifaceted, encompassing both short-term stimuli and long-term challenges. While such policies can effectively mitigate economic downturns and stimulate growth in the short run, policymakers must carefully balance the trade-offs and consider the long-term implications for inflation, unemployment, and overall economic stability. Mastering the complexities of monetary policy requires a deep understanding of economic theory and empirical evidence, underscoring the importance of rigorous study and critical analysis in the field of economics.

In crafting this comprehensive response, we've explored the intricate dynamics at play in the realm of macroeconomics, highlighting the nuanced interplay between monetary policy actions and key economic variables. By dissecting this master level question and providing a thorough answer, we've shed light on the complexities inherent in economics homework assignments, reinforcing the value of academic rigor and analytical thinking in mastering the discipline.

[mariacallous]

The brutality of Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre shocked even seasoned terrorism-watchers.  In one day, Hamas terrorists massacred more than 1,200 Israelis, mostly civilians. It has indiscriminately fired thousands of rockets at Israeli cities and towns. More than 200 hostages, including many children, remain captive in what must be nightmarish conditions beneath Gaza.  Hamas has vowed to murder them if Israel continues its military response.

The initial shock of the atrocities elicited strong statements of support for Israel from President Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the White House press secretary, the leaders of Germany and France, and other world leaders.

Yet media coverage of Israel’s war against Hamas has already shifted from the brutality of Hamas’s onslaught to the proportionality of Israel’s response. The number of unintended civilian casualties has risen steadily as a ground offensive, supported by airstrikes, has advanced. Major outlets have featured chyrons juxtaposing the number of deaths on each side. As Israel enters Gaza in force, comparisons will inevitably show higher counts on the Palestinian side.

Does this mean that Israel’s response is excessive or disproportionate? That Hamas’s brutality has already been repaid like-for-like and, thus, that Israel must stop?

Every innocent victim is a tragedy. But not every civilian death in war is evidence of illegal conduct by one of the parties. The law of war operates in an environment that is inherently brutal and tragic. Law cannot banish that brutality altogether. It aims, more modestly, to mitigate war’s cruelty by balancing military necessity with humanitarian aims.

International humanitarian law’s most powerful instrument for protecting innocents is separating combatants from civilians. Armed forces cannot target civilians. And they must separate their own military assets from the civilian population.

It is Hamas’s defiance of both of those rules that has made each successive phase of this war a humanitarian catastrophe.

Crimes Versus Tragedies: Unpacking Casualty Counts

On one level, casualty comparisons are intuitive: All lives have inherent worth. All innocent suffering merits sympathy.  

Yet casualty counts are a poor way to understand a conflict like this one. That is because they commingle deaths that are viewed very differently by the laws and ethics of warfare. Most of the Israeli toll thus far consists of civilians intentionally targeted by Hamas—a stark violation of the law of armed conflict.

The growing civilian toll on the Palestinian side is tragic, and all should hope that Hamas is defeated with the least possible innocent suffering. But incidental civilian casualties in strikes on lawful Hamas targets can be consistent with the laws of war. And Hamas itself is responsible for many of those civilian deaths because it cynically keeps or places civilians near military targets and uses civilian objects for military purposes.

Unintended civilian deaths and intentional murders are alike only in the very narrow sense that, in both cases, people have died from the actions of an armed force. Yet common intuition tells us that if we wish to form legal and moral judgments, then context, intentions, and legal duties matter.

Hamas’s Actions

The “cardinal,” “intransgressible” principle of the law of armed conflict is that armed forces must distinguish between combatants and civilians.

In its application to offensive operations, the principle of “distinction” holds that civilians can never be targeted, no matter how much military advantage would be gained by doing so. Hamas has ignored this principle throughout the Israel-Hamas conflict. As it always has. Not for nothing has Hamas been designated as a terrorist organization by the United States and other governments for decades.

Most of the Israelis killed in Hamas’s Oct. 7 rampage were unarmed civilians killed in cold blood in Israeli towns and kibbutzim and at the temporary rave encampment. These killings and other atrocities against civilians are unequivocally illegal. They are not legitimate acts of war.

Since Oct. 7, a smaller number of Israelis have been killed by rockets fired by Hamas. For legal purposes, the key question here is: fired at what?

Hamas, like Russia, indiscriminately bombards civilian areas, which are not valid targets. Indeed, Hamas does not even claim to be aiming for military objectives. Like the massacres of civilians on Oct. 7, deaths from those indiscriminate bombardments also result from Hamas’s violations of the laws of war.

Military personnel are generally valid targets. It bears noting, however, that Hamas does not follow basic legal rules even when attacking military targets. For example, videos and photos of Oct. 7 show that its combatants rarely distinguish themselves from civilians by wearing a distinctive uniform or insignia—in legal argot, a “fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance.”  

The requirement that combatants (including insurgent groups and militias) wear a distinguishing uniform or mark protects civilians from being fired upon in confusion by the other side. As elaborated below, Hamas’s ignoring that rule puts Palestinian civilians in further danger.  

Hamas has also committed grave breaches of the law of armed conflict by seizing Israeli civilians as hostages. Under the law of armed conflict, combatants can be taken prisoner and held for the duration of hostilities, and enemy civilians can be interned in rare instances. In both cases, however, their humane treatment is strictly required by international law and the rationale for their detention must be purely preventive.

By contrast, hostage-taking to “compel a third party to do or to abstain from doing any act”—as Hamas continues to do—is a war crime.

Deaths of Palestinian Civilians in Israel’s Response

The first thing to be said here is that every death of a Palestinian civilian is a human tragedy.  Palestinians trapped in Gaza, in the grip of a brutal terrorist group that brooks no opposition to its unpopular misrule, had no say in whether to launch this war. Yet it is civilians who suffer most for Hamas’s choice. Indeed, Hamas cynically increases and then broadcasts civilian suffering to erode international support for Israel’s military response.

The question here is how observers should categorize those deaths, and whether it makes sense legally and morally to juxtapose them with the Israeli civilians intentionally murdered and bombarded by Hamas.

The Israel Defense Forces and Distinction

Israeli forces operating in Gaza may attack only military objectives.  Military objectives include enemy combatants, civilians directly participating in hostilities (a complex category best left aside for now), and “military objects.”

Importantly, military objects include not just overt military installations but also “objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture or neutralization … offers a definite military advantage” (emphasis added).

That means that a nominally civilian building (or even a medical vehicle) can become a military object if Hamas uses it for military purposes. And Hamas regularly uses civilian areas to store weapons, to house command centers, and for other military aims.

Intentionally targeting a civilian object not being used for military purposes would, of course, violate the principle of distinction. (We’ll come to two additional legal requirements, precautions and proportionality, below.) Establishing that, however, requires granular knowledge of both the factual context—was Hamas, for example, using that building to store weapons?—and the commander’s state of mind.

Hamas and Distinction

The principle of distinction also imposes duties on the defender. Parties to a conflict must take “all feasible precautions to protect the civilian population and civilian objects under their control against the effects of attacks.”

In this conflict, Hamas has an affirmative legal duty to protect Palestinian civilians by “remov[ing] them,” to the extent feasible, “from the vicinity of military objectives.”

Hamas will not do that, of course.  

Not because it is infeasible. Hamas, which has governed the Gaza Strip for years, could have designated certain places in the strip as military enclaves and concentrated its fortifications, bunkers, weapons stores, fuel depots, rocket bases, and command centers there. It could have encouraged civilians to evacuate areas around those bases, rather than forcing them to stay put. Indeed, when the Israel Defense Forces tried to encourage civilians to move away from military targets, Hamas discouraged and blocked them from doing so, according to senior White House officials.

Hamas will not separate civilians from its military activities because following the law would be disadvantageous for Hamas. Hamas uses civilian areas to hide its military assets and complicate the choices facing Israeli targeters: Israeli forces can either forgo the strike, leaving Hamas with the military asset, or Israel can launch it, whereupon Hamas publicizes the resulting civilian suffering.

Hamas is evil, but its leaders are no fools: These tactics work. A NATO report examining Hamas’s activities from 2008 to 2014 explains how Hamas’s use of human shields in Gaza has long created a dilemma for Israel:

If the IDF uses lethal force and causes an increase in civilian casualties, Hamas can utilise that as a lawfare tool: it can accuse Israel of committing war crimes, which could result in the imposition of a wide array of sanctions.  Alternatively, if the IDF limits its use of military force in Gaza to avoid collateral damage, Hamas will be less susceptible to Israeli attacks[.]

International reactions make this kind of “lawfare” effective. Hamas knows that credulous observers will attribute these casualties to Israel—even though it was Hamas’s illegal decision to hide military assets in civilian areas that exposed the victims to harm.

Failing to place blame where it belongs—to unequivocally insist that Hamas move its military assets away from civilians, and to hold it responsible if it does not—encourages Hamas to put even more civilians in harm’s way.  

These cynical incentives for Hamas pervert the law’s humanitarian aims and put Palestinian civilians in greater danger.

How the Law of War Accounts for Unintended Civilian Casualties

Even when striking a legitimate military target, Israel must consider the potential harm to civilians. But “zero harm to civilians” is not the rule: Strikes on military targets can result in unintended civilian casualties without necessarily violating the law of armed conflict. Tragically, because Hamas intentionally commingles civilians and military assets, there have been many such deaths in this war.

The key rule here is proportionality, which requires armed forces to refrain from attacks that would inflict incidental civilian harm “excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated to be gained.”

Attacking forces must also take “feasible” precautions in attack to reduce the risk to civilians.  This can include verifying the military nature of the target, assessing risk to civilians before the strike, providing advance warning to civilians, adjusting the timing of an attack, choosing more precise weapons, and so forth.

Proportionality and precautions are intensely fact-bound. Civilian harm, military advantage, and feasibility are difficult to quantify. Their application often depends on the circumstances on the ground, at a fleeting moment, during the chaos of war.  

Reasonableness, not perfect hindsight, is the standard. After-the-fact assessments of proportionality must account for “variation in how reasonable persons would apply the principle of proportionality in a given circumstance” and “the information available to that person at the time.”  

The precautions required also vary with the context. Feasibility considers “all circumstances ruling at the time, including humanitarian and military considerations.” Those military considerations include risks to one’s own troops and to the mission’s success: “[A] commander,” the U.S. Law of War Manual explains, “may determine that a precaution would not be feasible because it would result in increased operational risk (i.e., a risk of failing to accomplish the mission) or an increased risk of harm to his or her forces.”

Photographs of shattered buildings and injured or dead civilians tell us that a tragedy has taken place. But without further information—without specific evidence of Israeli misconduct in assessing proportionality and taking feasible precautions—it is impossible to declare that any given tragedy was also a violation of the laws of war.

The sad reality is that many civilian deaths will result when a technologically sophisticated force confronts a terrorist group that chooses to fight from densely populated civilian areas and compels civilians to stay in anticipated battle zones. That is true even if the organized military uses precision weapons and cares deeply about the law.

Hamas knows that, of course. It stores weapons in schools and launches rockets from civilian neighborhoods fully aware that Israeli strikes on those military assets will harm civilians. Why? Because it knows that international observers will blame Israel, eroding support for Israeli military action. Here again, Hamas perversely exploits proportionality’s humanitarian aims, intentionally putting Palestinian civilians in harm’s way to generate legal pressure on Israel.

The Meta Question: Are the Laws of War the Right Rules?

This analysis rests on the premise that the laws of armed conflict are the right standard to apply to both parties’ conduct.

But are they?  

Perhaps, as some observers contend, different rules should apply to each side. For instance, a group of academics at Columbia University has suggested that “one could regard” the atrocities of Oct. 7 as “an occupied people exercising a right to resist violent and illegal occupation.” (The letter goes on to say that “armed resistance by an occupied people must conform to the laws of war,” including the rule against internationally targeting civilians. But it studiously avoids acknowledging what follows from that concession: By that standard, one cannot in fact “regard” Hamas’s massacres as legitimate resistance.)

Should Hamas be allowed to place its missiles in schoolyards and its command centers under hospitals, if it thinks that will help it prevail?

Should different rules apply to the weak and the strong?

Advocates of that idea should consider what it would do to the centuries-long humanitarian quest to humanize warfare. To the struggle for what Texas Law Dean Bobby Chesney has called the “civilizationally relevant” idea that “it’s not right to intentionally try to kill innocents to advance your political or social goals.”

Without reciprocity, that project founders. The modern law of war rests on reciprocal agreements among states aimed at reducing unnecessary suffering on both sides—among combatants themselves, but also among civilians, prisoners of war, the injured and shipwrecked, and others outside the fight

Those fundamental humanitarian prohibitions thus apply without regard to the justness of each side’s cause. In legal jargon: The jus in bello, which regulates the conduct of war, applies independently of the jus ad bellum, which governs the commencement of war. Even the controversial (in this respect) first Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, which elevates in certain respects anti-colonial struggles, does not purport to grant “resistance” fighters the right to murder innocents or otherwise wage war without limits.

If modern law’s fundamental humanitarian guarantees are to endure, they must apply equally to all parties, with no exemption for “especially worthy” causes.

Which belligerent has ever admitted that its cause is unjust? Which people fighting for survival would accept that the law constrains them, but not their enemies?  

No-holds barred for one side only is not a principle that can hold for long.

Indeed, there is a perverse irony in supporters of the weaker party disputing that the laws of war should apply equally to all.  

It is the weak, not the strong, who benefit most from universal restraint. In a world where anything goes, why would the strong forbear from using their power to the utmost? The alternative to universal rules is not asymmetric justice in favor of the weak. It is a ruthless world in which “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”

***

Acknowledging that the law of armed conflict is the right normative framework for both sides in this fight would benefit Palestinian civilians most of all.

If Hamas would keep civilians away from military emplacements and stop operating from within their midst, as the law requires, Hamas and the IDF could have it out with far fewer civilian casualties. In the Columbia professors’ words, Hamas could “resist” with less danger to the people on whose behalf it claims to fight.  

Any “right to resist” beyond the law’s constraints, then, is nothing more than a right to murder Israeli civilians and to use Palestinian innocents as human camouflage.

The suffering civilians of the Middle East deserve better friends than these.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Julia Steinberg

Published: Jul 27, 2023

“California is America, only sooner” was an optimistic phrase once used to describe my home state. The Golden State promised a spirit of freedom, innovation, and experimentation that would spread across the nation. And at the heart of the state’s flourishing was a four-letter word: math.

Math made California prosper.

It’s most obvious in top universities like Stanford, Caltech, Berkeley, and UCLA. Those schools funneled great minds into California STEM enterprises like Silicon Valley, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and aeronautical engineering. Both the Central Valley and Hollywood—America’s main providers of food and fodder, respectively—rely upon engineering to mechanize production and optimize output. 

All of this has made California’s GDP $3.6 trillion—making it the fifth largest economy in the world as of last year.

But now “California is America, only sooner” is a warning, and not just because of the exodus of people and jobs and the decay of our major cities, but because of the state’s abandonment of math—which is to say its abandonment of excellence and, in a way, reality itself. 

Perhaps you’ve read the headlines about kooky San Francisco discarding algebra in the name of anti-racism. Now imagine that worldview adopted by the entire state.

On July 12, that’s what happened when California’s Board of Education, composed of eleven teachers, bureaucrats, professors—and a student—decided to approve the California Mathematics Framework. 

Technically, the CMF is just a series of recommendations. As a practical matter, it’s the new reality. School districts and textbook manufacturers are already adapting to the new standards.

Here are some of them:

Most students won’t learn algebra until high school. In the past, when that was expected of middle schoolers, the CMF tells us, “success for many students was undermined.” 

This means calculus will mostly be verboten, because students can’t take calculus “unless they have taken a high school algebra course or Mathematics I in middle school.”

“Detracking” (ending advanced courses) will be the law of the land until high school; students will be urged to “take the same rich mathematics courses in kindergarten through eighth grade.”

Lessons will foreground “equity” at the expense of teaching math basics like addition and subtraction. “Under the framework, the range of student backgrounds, learning differences, and perspectives, taken collectively, are seen as an instructional asset that can be used to launch and support all students in a deep and shared exploration of the same context and open task,” the CMF continues. It adds that “learning is not just a matter of gaining new knowledge—it is also about growth and identity development.”

Letter grades will be discouraged in favor of “standards-based assessments.” (It’s unclear what those are.) 

Never mind that before California lowered its standards, the United States already ranked far behind the best-performing countries in math—places like Singapore, China, Estonia, and Slovenia. All those countries teach high school students calculus and, in some cases, more advanced linear algebra. (If we’re really in the midst of a cold war with China, we sure aren’t acting like it.)

The California Board of Education thinks the CMF is exactly what’s needed. That’s because the board has a fundamentally different approach to education—and it’s important that all Californians, indeed, all Americans, understand that. 

The board’s overriding concern is not education or mathematical excellence, but minimizing racial inequity. Since a disproportionate number of white and Asian kids perform at the high end of the mathematics spectrum, and a disproportionate number of black and Latino children are at the bottom end, the board was left with two options: pull the bottom performers up, or push the top performers down. They did the easier thing.

In case anyone is wondering whether this works, whether it actually achieves greater racial equity, we need only look to San Francisco, which adopted CMF proposals like detracking before the CMF formally did. 

“I want to be very clear on one fact that is based in our data: our current approach to math in SFUSD is not working,” San Francisco Unified School District Superintendent Matt Wayne said. “That is a tragedy, because we want to do right by our students. And we’re not meeting our goals around math. And particularly our students, especially black and brown students, are not benefiting from the current way we do math in the district.”

I emailed Jo Boaler, a Stanford education professor, one of the CMF’s authors, and a co-founder of youcubed, a center at Stanford that has pioneered ideas about equity and math education that figure prominently in the plan. I wanted to know what I was missing. What Matt Wayne was missing. 

Boaler replied that she didn’t have much to say about the CMF and that she was a “small cog in the system that produced the framework.”

When I pressed her to see if she could offer any thoughts about the ideas behind the CMF—ideas she’s well versed in—she suggested I speak with “lead writer” Brian Lindaman, a math education professor at Chico State. Lindaman did not reply to my email.

Eventually, I did manage to speak with Kyndall Brown, the executive director of UCLA’s California Mathematics Project, which is charged with implementing the CMF.

I started by saying the CMF is clearly focused on racial inequity—noting, for example, that Chapter 2 is all about equity and that it’s shot through with mentions of racial “disparities” and “gaps” when it comes to “student outcomes.”

Brown, who, like other CMF supporters, believes those disparities are largely, if not entirely, the fault of racially or culturally insensitive teaching methods, replied simply: “Do you know how racist that sounds?”

When I asked him what, exactly, was racist about that, he replied: “What mathematicians of color did you learn about as a student? What female mathematicians did you learn about?” (He appeared to be alluding to medieval Arab contributions to the fields of algebra and number theory—which are fascinating and important when studying the history of ideas, but not obviously germane when teaching ninth graders about quadratic equations.)

The thing is, the CMF will exacerbate racial inequities. I went to a private school in Los Angeles filled with white and Asian students, and I know exactly how those kids—and definitely their parents—would react if they were told they could no longer take advanced math. They would enroll in rigorous programs outside school, like the Russian School of Mathematics, that would push them way beyond wherever their peers are. By the time college applications came along, the racial gap would be more like a yawning chasm.

I turned to Alan Schoenfeld, a Berkeley education professor who advised members of the Board of Education on the CMF, to see what he thought about this, and he said the same thing opponents of affirmative action have—that lower-performing students might perform better and develop greater confidence if they’re in a less rigorous environment. “Now some of them are going to turn out to enjoy mathematics, and they’re going to pursue mathematical careers,” Schoenfeld told me.

Ian Rowe, a CMF critic best known for founding several independent schools in the Bronx, said of the plan’s supporters: “They’ve embraced this ideology of oppressor-oppressed framework, where it’s assumed that black kids are these marginalized, oppressed human beings, and white kids are somehow the privileged oppressors. You see this all across the country, where expectations are being lowered in the name of equity by teachers and principals to somehow level the playing field.”

Let’s be clear: the CMF is racism pretending to be progressive, and all the fancy ed speak—about “frameworks” and “detracking” and “identity development”—can’t obscure as much. Indeed, the ideological gap is basically nonexistent between CMF supporters and reactionaries who once thought black and Latino kids were cognitively or culturally incapable of advanced mathematics. 

We should be blaring this from the rooftops and on our social media feeds, over and over—lest we lose the California Dream, a.k.a. the American Dream, which once made this place so special.

==

Kids can't fail math if you don't teach it to them.

"Luxury beliefs are ideas and opinions that confer status on the upper class, while often inflicting costs on the lower classes." -- Rob Henderson

[applebrooklyn]

India bears a disproportionately large burden of the world's tuberculosis rates, with World Health Organization (WHO) statistics for 2011 giving an estimated incidence figure of 2.2 million cases for India out of a global incidence of 9.6 million cases.

Tuberculosis is one of India's biggest health issues, but what makes this problem even worse is the recent discovery of Totally Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, TDR-TB. This issue of drug resistance began with MDR-TB, moved to XDR-TB and, as of 2021, has grown to embrace the most dangerous form, TDR-TB.

The cost of this death and disease to the Indian economy between 2006 and 2014 was approximately US$1 billion.

Another major cause for the growth of TB in India has to do with its standing as a developing country. A study of Delhi slums has correlated higher scores on the Human Development Index and high proportions of one-room dwellings tend to correlate with TB at higher rates.[16] Poorly built environments, including hazards in the workplace, poor ventilation, and overcrowded homes have also been found to increase exposure to TB

( Their own living situation is causing them death and suffering, and bad wiring is causing summer fires)

It’s a fun fact and a reality check education hour.

I do agree with you. The world is living through a silent pandemic for years and it's the worst in India. We are struggling with it since pre independence era. The first sanatorium was established in 1905 or 1906, if I remember correctly, and even now, if you go to any of the colder places or hill stations, you will find these delepidated buildings which once used to be a sanatorium. One of them is near my college as well.

In 1951, the GOI launched a mass vaccination program for BCG and in 1962, National Tuberculosis Control Project was launched. As a young nation, we did well. Goverment's efforts were commendable. But soon enough, in late 1970s, we realised BCG vaccine isn't exactly working. This should have prompted the government to take an action, but nothing happened. Although, I would like to add here that some say that some data was lost between 1978-1979 (if my memory serves me right) and if we took that in account, the vaccine was working just fine. I would leave this to your discretion.

The world then saw the emergence of HIV in 1984. We too had cases of HIV infection. We did not knew until 1986. Until then, many were infected with HIV and TB was it's most common secondary infection. In 1992, we reported our first MDR TB case as well.

So we were in a hot soup. No vaccine, HIV, increasing population, recession, political upheaval, communication gap between the government and the masses, poor sanitation, lack of knowledge in public, MDR.

In 1993, TB was declared a global emergency and in the same year, Revised NTCP was piloted. We had our objectives clear—85% cure rate and 70% detection rates. And we did it. The catch—it took us 13 years!

Now, time is an asset. Even more so in the case of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. There is a whole catalogue of 17000 mutations which may lead to multi drug resistance. Bacteria are quick to reproduce and respond. They are exceptional at defence and time constraints are tight. Safe to say, the devil works fast, but bacteria work faster. Sadly, we did not realise it at that time. In 2012, we then encountered a rather strange strain that was resistant to all the first line and second line drugs—the TDR strain. As if MDR-TB wasn't a nuisance enough. The MDR-TB treatment has a success rate of only 54%. WHO reported roughly 3.4 lakh deaths due to TB in India in 2022 and 1.1 lakh were due to MDR-TB. We had record TB cases in 2023.

But yes, we are working on it. We are a big country with a big population. Population burden is always going to be an issue. We can't run from it. We are working on sanitation, it is taking time, but it will hopefully happen in its due course. In 2023, we became the first country to make a mathematical model to estimate the cases of tuberculosis. According to that, there was an 11 % reduction in the case of TB in 2022 as compared to 2023.

Government has launched NSP for Tuberculosis elimination (2017-2025). We have NiKshay ecosystem (under which the mathematical model has been developed), we have Nikshay poshan Yojana for financial support of TB patients. The scientists are doing their due. Two vaccines are under phase 3 clinical trials. Drugs are being developed. Rifampicin derivatives, BDQ, Delaminid etc.

So yeah, it's an uphill battle and we have made many mistakes. But if all of us do our respective parts, we still have a chance to overcome it.

[tfgadgets]

The multi-agency war against corruption in Telangana

The Anti-Corruption Bureau seized assets worth ₹6 crore from the residence of Nizamabad Municipal Corporation Revenue officer in-charge, Dasari Narendar and registered a case of disproportionate asset against him. File | Photo Credit: ANI There is a perception in Telangana that the Congress government is doing its best to stamp out corruption. ₹ In the aftermath of the 2023 Assembly elections…

[betshy]

The Morality of International Economic Sanctions

In today's interconnected global economy, economic sanctions have become a common tool used by countries to impose pressure on other nations in order to achieve certain political or diplomatic goals. These sanctions can take various forms, such as trade embargoes, restrictions on financial transactions, and asset freezes. While they are often seen as a necessary evil in international relations, the morality of economic sanctions is a complex and contentious issue. On one hand, proponents of economic sanctions argue that they can be an effective way to signal disapproval of a country's actions and to compel them to change their behaviour. For example, sanctions were imposed on South Africa during the apartheid era, ultimately contributing to the dismantling of the oppressive regime. Similarly, sanctions have been used to deter countries from pursuing nuclear weapons programs, such as in the case of Iran. However, critics of economic sanctions argue that they can have unintended humanitarian consequences, particularly for vulnerable populations. For example, sanctions can restrict access to essential goods and services, such as food, medicine, and clean water, leading to increased poverty and suffering among ordinary citizens. In some cases, sanctions can exacerbate existing political tensions and contribute to the destabilisation of a country, as seen in Venezuela and North Korea. Furthermore, economic sanctions can also be seen as a form of economic warfare that disproportionately affects the most marginalised and vulnerable populations within a country. They can be used as a tool by more powerful countries to assert dominance and influence the political landscape of a region, without considering the impact on civilians who have little control over the actions of their government. Ultimately, the morality of economic sanctions depends on the context in which they are used and the potential consequences they may have on innocent civilians. While they can be a useful tool in certain circumstances, policymakers must carefully weigh the potential benefits against the harmful impact on populations. It is important to consider alternative diplomatic and humanitarian approaches that prioritise the well-being of individuals and seek to facilitate dialogue and cooperation between countries. As we navigate the complex landscape of international relations, it is crucial to always remember the human cost of our actions and strive for ethical decision-making in all circumstances. Read the full article

[karuppuezhutthu-blog]

சொத்து குவிப்பு வழக்கில் தங்கம் தென்னரசு, சாத்தூர் ராமச்சந்திரனை விடுவித்தது செல்லாது: ஐகோர்ட் உத்தரவு | Disproportionate assets cases: Madras High Court reverses discharge of Ministers

சென்னை: சொத்து குவிப்பு வழக்குகளில் இருந்து அமைச்சர்கள் தங்கம் தென்னரசு, சாத்தூர் ராமச்சந்திரன் ஆகியோரை விடுவித்து ஸ்ரீவில்லிபுத்தூர் நீதிமன்றம் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் ரத்து செய்துள்ளது. அவர்கள் மீதான வழக்கை மீண்டும் முதலில் இருந்து தினந்தோறும் என்ற அடிப்படையில் விசாரிக்குமாறும் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. தமிழகத்தில் கடந்த 2006-11 திமுக ஆட்சியில் பள்ளிக்கல்வித் துறை அமைச்சராக இருந்த…

[taaza-khabar]

In the Dilip Khedkar case of possessing excessive assets, the complainant has provided 2,000 pages of evidence to the ACB

Dilip was suspended on February 24, 2020, by authorities following a departmental investigation which revealed that he had threatened 300-400 small businessmen for extortion while working in Mumbai, which led to a complaint being lodged with MPCB. Tanaji Gambhire lodged a complaint with ACB Pune, providing more than 2,000 pages of evidence in a case involving disproportionate assets linked to…

[bhaskarlive]

SC refuses to quash DA case against Karnataka Deputy CM Shivakumar

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea filed by Deputy Chief Minister of Karnataka, DK Shivakumar, seeking quashing of CBI proceedings against him in the alleged Disproportionate Assets (DA) case.

A Bench presided over by Justice Bela M Trivedi declined to interfere with the October 2023 decision of the Karnataka High Court which had denied quashing the case registered against Shivakumar under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[wordexpress]

DMK mouthpiece Murasoli slams Governor RN Ravi for 'saffronising' Thiruvalluvar

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) Mouthpiece Murasoli on Monday attacked Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi, accusing him of 'saffronising' Thiruvalluvar and said that he insulted the ancient Tamil poet-saint.

Murasoli claimed that paying respects to a portrait of Thiruvalluvar clad in saffron, Ravi has proved that he didn't read even a single couplet of Thirukkural (a collection of couplets on ethics, political and economic matters, and love written by him).

"Saffron today is the symbol of division. Isn't it an insult to saffronise Thiruvalluvar, who said that all are born equal!", Murasoli claimed in one of the articles.

Murasoli also claimed that the divinity mentioned in Thirukkural is not the divinity used by BJP for 'divide and rule'.

Murasoli went on to say that the tactics of 'embrace and destroy' is being used by Governor Ravi and that a few couplets have been chosen to portray Vedic principles. It further said that such people will never support Sanga Tamil but only Sanghi Tamil.

The ruling DMK, led by Chief Minister MK Stalin, and Governor RN Ravi have come at loggerheads over a host of issues, one of them being the swearing-in of former Minister K Ponmudy's swearing-in as a Cabinet Minister in March.

Ravi had refused to administer the oath of office to Ponmudy, rejecting Chief Minister MK Stalin's request after the Supreme Court stayed Ponmudy's conviction in a disproportionate assets case and suspended three-year jail sentence.

[mediagraph]

DMK mouthpiece Murasoli slams Governor RN Ravi for 'saffronising' Thiruvalluvar

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) Mouthpiece Murasoli on Monday attacked Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi, accusing him of 'saffronising' Thiruvalluvar and said that he insulted the ancient Tamil poet-saint.

Murasoli claimed that paying respects to a portrait of Thiruvalluvar clad in saffron, Ravi has proved that he didn't read even a single couplet of Thirukkural (a collection of couplets on ethics, political and economic matters, and love written by him).

"Saffron today is the symbol of division. Isn't it an insult to saffronise Thiruvalluvar, who said that all are born equal!", Murasoli claimed in one of the articles.

Murasoli also claimed that the divinity mentioned in Thirukkural is not the divinity used by BJP for 'divide and rule'.

Murasoli went on to say that the tactics of 'embrace and destroy' is being used by Governor Ravi and that a few couplets have been chosen to portray Vedic principles. It further said that such people will never support Sanga Tamil but only Sanghi Tamil.

The ruling DMK, led by Chief Minister MK Stalin, and Governor RN Ravi have come at loggerheads over a host of issues, one of them being the swearing-in of former Minister K Ponmudy's swearing-in as a Cabinet Minister in March.

Ravi had refused to administer the oath of office to Ponmudy, rejecting Chief Minister MK Stalin's request after the Supreme Court stayed Ponmudy's conviction in a disproportionate assets case and suspended three-year jail sentence.

[resourcesofcolor]

Belonging and the Land: A Case Study of Chakras Among the Kichwa By The Center for 21st Century Studies - April 12, 2023

The sun has yet to rise, and water is boiling to prepare guayusa1 tea. Generations of family sit side by side, drinking their tea, recounting their dreams, and preparing for the day ahead. In the twilight hours, the family leaves to tend to their chakras. Upon arrival, they harvest cacao and yucca, collect timber for the evening’s fire, and care for the various plants, vines, and trees that call the chakra home. As they tend to chakras, elders entrust youth with the knowledge of plants, an understanding of the inherent interdependence of all living things, and a means to ensure their land and culture survive for generations to come.

The 2019 Global Environmental Outlook noted that, “having evolved after years of observation and experience from a holistic relationship between people and nature, traditional knowledge sustains life and landscapes.” Not only do Indigenous people recognize a deeper connection to nature, but they are also disproportionately affected by transgressions against the environment. In her book Silent Snow, Marla Cone’s words ring true for many of the world’s Indigenous people: “With little power to defend themselves, they are at the mercy of others - governments and outsiders who have long ignored their needs - or worse, tried to wipe out their ancient traditions by assimilating them into modern society.” Indigenous people have routinely been dispossessed of their traditional hereditary assets, among these being agricultural practices. With climate change, land scarcity, and increased intrusion from the outside world, Indigenous growing methods are suffering. One such example is the decreased use of the chakra growing method among the Kichwa, one of several Indigenous people residing in the Napo Province of the Ecuadorian Amazon.

Chakras are agroforestry plots where crops are intermixed with trees meant to mirror the nature around them. Many Kichwa are subsistence farmers who spend time tending their chakras, growing products that enhance food and nutrition security and promote traditional dietary practices. Fresh foods from chakras often provide a more robust spectrum of nutrients than the modern diet. Chakras also contribute to the biodiversity of the Ecuadorian Amazon. They support the soil bed through a mixture of trees, shrubs, and plants, and once abandoned, they quickly revert to a mature forest-like state. Additionally, they provide buffers around forest reserves and conservation areas and act as corridors of migration for different species. The Kichwa nourish the land and, in turn, are nourished by the land.

[p5ravin]

Understanding Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) and Exploring the Pinnacle of NFT Valuation.

The Non-Fungible Token (NFT) market has emerged as one of the fastest-growing sectors within the blockchain industry, recording an impressive $41 billion in volume in 2021. Notably, NFT companies are attracting significant investments, with leading marketplace OpenSea securing $300 million in a funding round at the beginning of the year, valuing the company at $13 billion.

The escalating popularity of the NFT space has driven prices to extraordinary levels, raising concerns about hyper-inflation in the NFT market. This phenomenon is partly attributed to the sale of the most expensive NFT, fetching over $90 million. To better understand the dynamics of NFTs and their actual value, let's delve deeper into the concept.

What are Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)?

Non-fungible tokens are cryptographic assets on a blockchain, characterized by unique identification codes and metadata that set them apart from each other. Unlike fungible assets, NFTs cannot be interchanged on a one-to-one basis, contributing to the creation of digital scarcity. NFTs represent various real-world objects such as art, music, in-game items, and videos, providing digital ownership and authentication through blockchain technology.

How do NFTs Work?

NFTs operate on a blockchain, a decentralized digital ledger that records transactions. While Ethereum is a primary blockchain supporting NFTs, other blockchains also offer compatibility. NFTs are created or "minted" from digital objects representing tangible or intangible items like graphic art, GIFs, videos, and more. Ownership of an NFT is exclusive, with blockchain technology ensuring easy verification and transferability between owners.

How to Buy NFTs?

Purchasing NFTs requires several steps. Users need a digital wallet capable of storing both NFTs and cryptocurrencies. Buying cryptocurrency, such as Ethereum (ETH), is necessary, with platforms like Coinbase or Kraken facilitating the exchange. After acquiring crypto, users can transfer it to their chosen wallet, keeping in mind potential transaction fees associated with buying and transferring crypto.

Blockchain Technology

Blockchain technology underpins the existence of NFTs, providing a decentralized digital ledger maintained by the users themselves. The distributed and global nature of blockchains ensures transparency, autonomy, and security, enabling NFTs to represent and verify ownership of digital assets seamlessly.

The NFT Hype

The hype around NFTs began with the transformation of art into NFTs, attracting art collectors to the blockchain space. This move also contributed to the existing speculative market in cryptocurrency and blockchain. NFTs expanded beyond art, venturing into the metaverse, where in-game assets became transferable, giving rise to the play-to-earn concept. The innovation around NFTs sparked a chain reaction, offering various use cases and opportunities within the blockchain space.

Justifying the Hype

To assess the justification of NFT hype, it is crucial to evaluate the utility they bring. NFTs address significant issues in the art world by providing a platform for artists to sell and authenticate their work while reaching a broader audience. The play-to-earn space, enabled by NFTs, allows individuals to play blockchain-powered games and earn money through in-game asset trading. Additionally, NFTs are evolving into a stable store of value, potentially outperforming traditional cryptocurrencies in stability.

While the current hype around NFTs may seem disproportionate to their utility, ongoing innovation suggests a narrowing gap between the technology's potential and its market perception.

The Most Expensive NFTs

The Merge ($91.8 million): Created by Pak, The Merge is the most expensive NFT with multiple owners, purchased by over 30,000 collectors in December 2021.

The First 5000 Days ($69.3 million): A collage by Beeple, representing 5000 days of consecutive artwork creation, sold as a single-owner NFT in March 2021.

Clock ($52.7 million): A unique NFT by Pak and Julian Assange, counting down Assange's imprisonment days, purchased collectively by AssangeDAO in February 2022.

HUMAN ONE ($28.9 million): Sold by Beeple in November 2021 during a Christie’s auction, HUMAN ONE is a generative work of art intended for continuous evolution.

CryptoPunk #5822 ($23 million): The most expensive CryptoPunk, featuring a blue alien with a bandana, purchased by Deepak Thapliyal in February 2022.

Who is Beeple?

Mike Winkelmann, known as Beeple, is a digital artist renowned for his everyday art creation practice spanning almost 15 years. Beeple's compilation, "The First 5000 Days," was sold as an NFT for $69 million. His innovative approach has revitalized the art industry, leading to his recognition as the third most valuable living artist globally.

Types of CryptoPunks

CryptoPunks encompass various types, including aliens, apes, zombies, females, and males, each possessing unique features. Genesis Punks, the first 1,000 CryptoPunks, hold no distinctive features, while specific Punks like #8384 are highly sought after.

In conclusion, the NFT market's surge in 2021 has sparked excitement for potential growth in 2022. While concerns about hyper-inflation persist due to soaring prices, NFTs are undeniably reshaping the art industry and offering diverse opportunities within the blockchain space. The top NFTs, especially those by Beeple and the CryptoPunk collection, continue to dominate the market, showcasing the transformative impact of NFTs.

[advocate-paresh-m-modi]

Anti Corruption Act Lawyer in Ahmedabad | 9925002031 | Best Advocate for Anti Corruption cases in Gujarat | Advocate Paresh M Modi

**Anti-Corruption Act in India & Advocate Paresh Modi, Top Criminal Advocate in Gujarat**

The Anti-Corruption Act in India is a crucial legal framework aimed at curbing corrupt practices within the country. The primary legislation addressing corruption is the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. This act defines various offenses related to corruption and prescribes penalties for individuals involved in corrupt practices. Advocate Paresh M Modi is the best Criminal Lawyer in Ahmedabad Gujarat for Anti corruption Cases.

**Key Provisions:**

1. **Bribery Offenses:** The act criminalizes the act of giving or accepting bribes, whether in the public or private sector.

2. **Abuse of Position:** It prohibits public servants from using their official position for personal gains or for the benefit of others.

3. **Criminal Misconduct:** Public servants engaging in any form of criminal misconduct while in office are subject to legal action.

4. **Asset Disproportion:** The law empowers authorities to investigate cases where public servants possess assets disproportionate to their known sources of income.

5. **Whistleblower Protection:** The act incorporates provisions to protect whistleblowers who expose corruption, ensuring their safety and confidentiality.

6. **Judicial Independence:** The act acknowledges the importance of maintaining the independence of the judiciary by penalizing any attempts to influence the judicial process through corrupt means.

Anti Corruption Case Vakil in Ahmedabad | 9925002031 | Top Attorney for Anti Corruption cases in Gujarat | Advocate Paresh M Modi

**Advocate Paresh Modi:**

Advocate Paresh Modi is renowned as one of the best lawyers in Gujarat, known for his expertise in handling a wide range of legal matters, including cases related to corruption and white-collar crimes.

**Key Achievements:**

1. **Legal Prowess:** With extensive experience in the legal field, Advocate Paresh Modi has successfully represented clients in high-profile corruption cases, earning a reputation for his legal acumen.

2. **Ethical Approach:** Known for his commitment to ethical practices, Advocate Modi ensures that legal proceedings are conducted with transparency and adherence to the principles of justice.

3. **Client Advocacy:** Paresh Modi is dedicated to providing strong advocacy for his clients, employing a strategic approach to navigate complex legal issues effectively.

4. **Community Involvement:** Beyond his legal practice, Advocate Paresh M Modi actively contributes to the legal community through seminars, workshops, and initiatives aimed at promoting legal awareness and fighting corruption.

**Anti-Corruption Act in India: Overview**

The primary legislation in India aimed at combating corruption is the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. This act was enacted to address various forms of corruption involving public servants. The legislation defines and penalizes corruption offenses and establishes procedures for the investigation and trial of such cases.

**Punishments under the Anti-Corruption Act:**

1. **Taking Gratification:** - Any public servant who accepts or obtains, or agrees to accept or attempts to obtain, for himself or for any other person, any gratification as a motive or reward for doing or forbearing to do any official act is punishable.

2. **Abetting Offenses:** - Abetting the commission of the above offenses is also punishable under the act.

3. **Criminal Misconduct:** - Public servants involved in criminal misconduct, including abuse of position for pecuniary advantage, are liable for punishment.

4. **Punishment:** - The punishment for offenses under the act includes imprisonment, which may extend to (7) seven years, or with fine, or with both.

**Court Procedure for Anti-Corruption Act Cases:**

1. **FIR and Investigation:** - The process typically begins with the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) by the concerned anti-corruption agency or the police. The investigation is then initiated to collect evidence.

2. **Arrest and Remand:** - If the investigating agency finds sufficient evidence, the accused may be arrested. The accused may be produced before a magistrate who decides on custody or bail.

3. **Charge Sheet:** - After completing the investigation, a charge sheet is filed before the court, detailing the charges and evidence against the accused.

4. **Trial:** - The trial is conducted in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. Both the prosecution and defense present their cases, and witnesses are examined. The court evaluates the evidence and arguments.

5. **Verdict:** - The court pronounces its verdict based on the evidence presented. If the accused is found guilty, the court proceeds to determine the appropriate punishment.

6. **Appeals:** - Both the prosecution and the accused have the right to appeal against the verdict. Higher courts may review the case and make a final decision.

**Conclusion:**

The Prevention of Corruption Act plays a crucial role in India's efforts to combat corruption. The act outlines offenses, provides for stringent punishments, and establishes a legal framework for the investigation and trial of corruption cases involving public servants. The court procedures ensure a fair trial, and the legal system allows for appeals to higher courts to ensure justice is served. It's important to stay updated with any amendments to the legislation and consult legal professionals for specific advice or information.

You may contact Advocate Paresh M Modi for your criminal case related to anti corruption act, Call / WhatsApp on Mobile No. 9925002031 or Email on "advocatepmmodi@gmail.com"

[collymore]

There's a multitude of dark, repugnant and criminal secrets these Windsors are hiding!

By Stanley Collymore

In the UK all wills are compulsorily in the public domain except those of the Windsors, Britain's supposedly monarchical family. Consequently, this unquestionably very risibly and essentially quite ludicrously so-called royal - whatever literally, that undoubtedly fatuous term undeniably realistically means - family obviously undeniably egregiously; significantly and crucially basically self-servingly entitled; which unquestionably also adequately, and literally shamefully basically truly sums up, everything that's characteristically manifestly disproportionately wrong with our country. Sensibly, what is a royal? People: who clearly from my very astute and objective perspective, quite asininely make up very silly titles for each other, so that their rather daft, sycophantic morons who've fittingly, been essentially successfully quite brainwashed from birth can, and naturally do, clearly unquestioningly actually worship them; literally doing so most instinctively just because they really, very fatuously, think these literally preferred, people are obviously, far more special and accordingly, actually more deserving of quite special and rather ongoingly, outrageously prefetential treatment, literally simply more so than basically everyone else, when evidently in actuality; they undoubtedly, most unquestionably are not!  

And furthermore in their case not noticeably quite bright but still instinctively on the take; which simply does actually say a lot really regarding you very obviously unquestionably pathetically, effectively and significantly, thoroughly, and quite vilely distinctly and simply discernibly   brownnosing idiotically white Britons and your equally sad, likeminded kin: still infesting, and actually arbitrarily controlling those rather barbarously and genocidally acquired countries, like the undeniably, unquestionably, delusionally, and purportedly, Terra nuliius Australia, New Zealand too, Canada and the USA! Stupid serfs that you laughable lot innately are!

(C) Stanley V.  Collymore 22 January 2024.

Author's Remarks: The efficacy, morality and the legality of who simply other than the lawfully stated recipient(s) of an aptly genuine testator's will should distinctively have unhindered access obviously, to the full contents of that deceased person's will should be an unequivocal matter of solidly universally enshrined and permanently established law, as well as an entitled necessity under a statutory Freedom of Information Act! And no one, who is either a citizen of the UK or as a non-citizen thereof who makes a will within the clear legal jurisdiction of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland should under any circumstance be either arbitrarily, judicially or politically be ever prohibited from, debarred of, or actually denied such information as is distinctly and likewise thoroughly enclosed within any will and is accordingly requested.

And to countenance, or personally seek to do so, any person's lawful right to see and obviously inspect any such will by anyone, totally regardless of who or obviously what that individual, or persons, social status is, must be automatically seen, and similarly regarded as a severe criminal offence that attendant with such person(s) on actually being found guilty in a senior court of law, and from which no one is excluded on any grounds, those guilty persons must then be automatically jailed for a minimum of 15 years hard labour without any prospect of parole, totally allied with the full seizure of their personal assets, which would then unquestionably quite literally automatically essentially go to the categorical benefit of the state allied with these convicts names and details permanently placed on a public notoriety list!  

In addition, likewise, those members of the legal profession, at whatever level, who've been found to be very complicit in anyway in these illegalities would be barred for life and literally, subjected as well to statutory, draconian financial penalties.

Without exception or any legal exclusion all members of the Windsor family,  who like to evidently self-indulgently envisage themselves as a "Firm" would be obviously legally obligated to adhere to every iota of these enshrined laws; and being the rather feudal mafia, which they undoubtedly are, would be subjected to intensive and quite routine as well as detailed comprehensive scrutiny and like everyone else obviously have to account to the Inland Revenue how they acquired their wealth and likewise too their incoming revenue and rather similarly like all eligible persons within the UK made to pay their requisite inheritance taxes!

This, after all, is the 21st Century that we are obviously living in, and not the bloody Middle Ages; and as such is unequivocally an era of Equality of Opportunity, evidently Meritocracy and informed Democracy not by any means a scenario of untrammelled feudalism; and if you Brits at home and in the undoubtedly very genocidally acquired countries that you acquired and still rather arbitrarily and exclusively control basically desire in your brainwashed existences, to carry on existing in this pathetic sphere of twisted delusion, seeing yourselves simply as fawning serfs and dutiful plebeians to your asininely believed superior and also equally divine monarchical masters and as well similarly too their mistresses, then by all means do what you want with your own meaningless and unworthy lives, but then, please categorically leave those of us with intelligent minds and who very specifically obviously know how to constructively use them, to forge our own quite constructive destinies in a modern and unquestionably progressive Century; and not forcibly have to revert with you to a Dark Ages one!