yo bro check out this term which i coined
it's called schrödingerian
i coined it based off my own experience as a circukin & objectkin and it's used to describe someone who is both a sentient and non-sentient object/being :]
so uh.. i can't post bout this bcuz my parents know i have tumblr so um make sure to spread this across the alterhuman community ^_^
DR FIZZ 💥 that term is really neat! i hope it catches on, i can kinda relate to it myself :]
9 notes
·
View notes
ATSUSHI - FICTION/OTHERHEARTED
Atsushi other/Fiction-hearted refers to an individual who experiences a profound sense of connection to or appreciation for Nakajima Atsushi from Bungou Stray Dogs. This connection is characterized by strong emotional and/or sentimental feelings toward Atsushi.
As with any identity-related term, the understanding and use of fiction-hearted may vary among individuals, and it represents a subjective and personal aspect of one's relationship with fiction!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also just incase for the ppl who get easily confused, otherhearted and fiction-hearted is the same thing; it's just Fiction-hearted is a specification of hearttype, you can use both/or fictionhearted and otherhearted label. Whatever you feel most comfy with!♡
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And credits to @spiderfactory for the fictionhearted symbol on the left
3 notes
·
View notes
Altrenic flags
The term altrenic refers to the feeling or belief that one exists in an alternate universe or parallel reality, separate from the “usual” reality. This sensation may be influenced by factors such as kinning, alternate realities in fiction, or a sense of detachment from the present reality.
Coined by me but if it’s a recoin do tell.
Anyone can use this term or coin -altrenic terms
Coined with alterhuman beings in mind
172 notes
·
View notes
MALWARE / VIRUS ID
[IMAGE ID: A flag with seven horizontal stripes, the center stripe being black with a gradient to the vibrant top and bottom stripes. There's an angular/geometrical version of the biohazard symbol in the middle. The first flag has a bright red symbol with darker red stripes, the second flag has a bright green symbol with darker green stripes. /ID END]
— Someone who is queer, non-human, alter-human, therian, otherkin, and/or fictionkin who's identity is associated with malware, computer viruses, trojans, "computer worms", or anything similar.
— Someone who is malwarekin/viruskin/malwaregender/virusgender may or may not kin, identify as, or be associated with computer viruses/worms/trojans/malware, such as ILOVEYOU, You Are An Idiot, Mydoom, or others.
Pronouns associated with being a virus are:
— xe/xem/xemself
— computer/computers/computerself
— it/its/itself
— that/that thing/that things
— glitch/glitches/glitchself
— web/site/webself (or siteself)
— byte/bytes/byteself
+ OTHERS
FREE TO USE
163 notes
·
View notes
Isofic, a New Term for Fictionfolk
[PT: Isofic, a New Term for Fictionfolk /End PT]
I've been looking for a way to communicate my belief system for a while now, and I've landed on creating my own term.
[ID: A flag in muted colors. It has an orange stripe on top and a yellow stripe on bottom. The stripes are even and there is a blue rectangle overlayed over the center. The rectangle appears transparent. /End ID]
The contrast of the yellow and orange stripes represent the difference between fiction and reality, while the rectangle represents how fictionfolk fit inside that balance perfectly.
Derived from iso- (equal) and -fic (fiction) (basic I know), "isofic" (eye-so-fick) is a way to describe people and ideas that follow this line of thinking:
Fictionfolk* should be allowed to exist as themselves without being accused of being "anti-recovery," "promoting delusions," or "being unhealthy."
Fictionfolk should be allowed to choose for themselves how they want others to talk about them and how they talk about themselves. It should be considered a natural, or even expected occurrence for fictionfolk to dislike terms such as "kintype" and "kinning" and being reffered to in third person.
The proximity of fictionfolk to their fictionselves should be dictated only by the person. Fictional identities should be believed regardless of how "similar" they are to their fictional/past self, and the only scenario in which someone should be told they are not a character is when they themselves have said so.
This is more of a summary of the three beliefs above, but it covers a lot of bases I cannot: Fictionfolk ARE fictional characters in every sense of the word. Again, it's totally appropriate to view it differently on a personal level, but mostly we are all the people we say we are. We are ourselves the same way Mitsuki Miyawaki is Mitsuki Miyawaki.
All views of fiction by fictionfolk are valid. Examples include media being a biography of your life, jumping out of the media into the real world, ect.
This is where it gets controversial: Fictionfolk deserve to have the most important voice when it comes to discussion of ourselves. I deserve to be listened to when I say someone's headcanon about me is wrong. I am not advocating for all creativity of this manner to be stopped. For example, if someone headcanons that I don't like apples and I say "I actually do," it's totally okay to me if they go "oh cool. I'm still going to pretend you do." Where it becomes an issue is when they decide to say "that's not true because I said so."
Likewise, things like this need to be treated as potentially triggering content. I don't want the enforcement of "if you don't tag your headcanons you're EVIL" or some bullshit like that, I just believe it needs to be recognized that these things can hurt people! For example, if you already have a trigger tagging system, it should be normalized to add the "not fictionfolk safe" tag to that.
This is going to sound highly specific, but all of these principles apply to media as well. If a character is fictionfolk-coded, then they are the character they say they are within the media! Can you tell my fandom is super gross about me? Lol.
*Fictionfolk, for the purposes of this coining, refers to fictional characters regardless of origin. This is different from the actual definition of fictionfolk, which includes fictional species, places, plants, and concepts, and includes experiences such as relating to these things rather than just being them.
There are also some beliefs that are not explicitly related to fictionfolk, but still need to be touched on.
Species dysphoria is real and dangerous, and should be treated with the same level of gravity as gender dysphoria.
Referring to alterhumans improperly should be viewed similarly to how misgendering is viewed in that it needs to be acknowledged that it's deeply disrespectful and due to species dysphoria should not be taken lightly.
Alterhumans may not be systemically oppressed on the basis of being alterhuman by itself, but we are oppressed on an individual level. Additionally, some forms of alterhumanity are systemically oppressed, for example endels, clinical zoanthropes, systems, and more are often subjected to incarceration.
Following the model of queerness as a deviation from the norm rather than specifically meaning "LGBTQ+," alterhumanity is queer.
Alterhumanity should not be censored or gatekept from good faith actors. However, those considered KFF are absolutely not good faith actors.
Any attempt to water down alterhumanity is unwelcome, no matter if it's a TikTok user saying "Therians know they're human" or a Tumblr user "setting healthy limits for alterhumanity."
Everything should always be based on someone's own perception of themself as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.
I know that's a lot, so feel free to comment if you have any questions!
143 notes
·
View notes