#hrh duchess of sussex

[candicebella]

The Duchess Of Sussex | Altuzarra

[meghanharryarchie]

[miss-mollys-ballet-blog]

When it comes to royals, there is nothing more annoying than finding a post about Catherine and it being filled with people screaming about Meghan, whether it’s pro or against her.  I am there for Catherine, not Meghan.  Take your nonsense elsewhere omg.

And I would imagine it’s the same irritation as those who pay attention/care about Meghan too.  They’re there for Meghan, not Catherine.

[thistleandwine]

Happy Birthday to HRH The Duchess of Sussex

[72crowe89]

Harry and Meghan: Double Standard

A lot of discussion has been about how HRH The Duchess of Sussex has disparaged the BRF and ripped HRH The Duke of Sussex and their children away from they family in Great Britain. Now, I haven't read all of the comments TRH The Sussexes have stated over the years, so I may have missed some, but I wanted to compare what each of TRH The Sussexes have said or done, mostly in regards to the BRF.

HRH The Duchess of Sussex

Stated that she loved HLM The Queen

Stated that she is close to Princess Eugenie

Stated that HRH The Princess of Wales made her cry but apologized afterward

Made HRH The Princess of Wales cry but apologized afterward

Stated that Sarah, Duchess of York helped her out immensely

Stated that the BRF in general are reserved publicly and privately

Stated that the BRF in general were not supportive of her

Repeated a story that her husband told her about comments about their incoming child's skin color

Aired BRF business to the media

Criticized the British media

Doesn't seem to understand BRF customs and allegedly never tried

Complained about the removal of BRF security

Allegedly bullied BRF staff

Has not said anything specific about HM The King

Has not said anything specific about HM The Queen Consort

Has not said anything specific about HRH The Prince of Wales

Has not said anything specific about the Wales's children

Has not said anything specific about the British people

HRH The Duke of Sussex

Has accused his father of being jealous of his sons and leaking stories to the press

Has accused his brother of being short-tempered and violent and jealous of him

Has accused his stepmother of planting stories about him to make his father and herself look better

Has accused his father and grandparents of generational trauma

Stated that the BRF and/or the British people suffer from unconscious bias because of his wife's race

Stated that everyone is trapped in the BRF and slaves to the British press

Condemns the British press with everything in his being

Airs specific details about specific family members to the media

Accuses the BRF of being jealous of his wife

Downplays bullying allegations against his wife

Criticize the removal of BRF security

Loved his grandmother but also feared her

Loves his niece and nephews but stated that one of them will be treated like the "bad one" in the media

Criticized the British people for their interest in the British press

The reason why I point this out is because, it spite of HRH The Duke of Sussex being more critical of his own family and country, being more specific in targeting certain family members, airing out more private details, and discussing his hatred of the media long before his current relationship, many people and especially the media lie the blame at HRH The Duchess of Sussex's feet, with her husband as her dim-witted mouth piece. All the vitriol, therefore, goes to her, with the Clarkson article being the most extreme.

So, yes. Criticize HRH The Duchess of Sussex for leaving the BRF without giving it an honest go. Criticize her for not learning more about British culture in general and the British Royal Family in particular. Criticize her for complaining about the BRF in public. Criticize her for condemning the media when it's against her but engaging in it when it's for her. Criticize her for bullying her staff.

But don't lay her husband's specific, detailed accusations about his own family and his own countrymen at her feet. He's a nearly 40-year old man…he can make his own decisions.

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

do you think the designation of “fixated person” is why they’re fighting so hard to have state security? So they don’t have to accept fault but instead do a tit-for-tat by getting PW or PK designated by RPOs? It just seems like the thing that truly fixated people like the terrible couple would do.

No.

First, just a reminder that we don’t actually know Meghan has been designated a “fixated person” with any degree of certainty. It’s gossip from someone who knows someone who knows the Netflix camera crew who might’ve heard something. We don’t actually know what or if the Sussexes have been given anything other than case-by-case RAVEC status and they’re pissed about it.

They’re fighting so hard for state security because they feel entitled to it by the circumstances of Harry’s birth and the virtue of Meghan’s skin color. They want exactly everything that William and William’s wife have because Harry’s beloved dead mother said that Harry deserves everything that William gets, exactly the same as William gets it. So if William gets 24/7 protection because being King Charles and Diana, Princess of Wales’s son makes him a global security risk, then Harry should have 24/7 protection because he is also King Charles and Diana, Princess of Wales’s son.

If William’s wife gets 24/7 protection because she’s married to the son of King Charles and Diana, Princess of Wales and that makes her a global security risk, then Harry’s wife should also have 24/7 protection because she’s also married to the son of King Charles and Diana, Princess of Wales and that makes her a global security risk.

If William’s children are titled HRH Prince/Princess and have 24/7 protection because they’re the grandchildren of King Charles and Diana, Princess of Wales and that makes them a global security risk, then Harry’s children should also have 24/7 protection because they’re also the grandchildren of King Charles and Diana, Princess of Wales and that makes them a global security risk.

That’s all this is, with a dash of “but I fought valiantly on the front lines in the War on Terror twice” and a heaping of “race card” because being the Duke and Duchess of Sussex is actually an irrelevant dead-end existence, compared to being the Prince and Princess of Wales (who get to eventually be King and Queen), so they need anything they can get to seem like they’re more hated to better the chances of getting their demands met.

[saintmeghanmarkle]

The REAL reason the Harkles went to Nigeria. by u/deedee50

The REAL reason the Harkles went to Nigeria. THIS IS ALLEGED INFO.According to MeghansMic oN X, with info from you tube's LeilaniOfBarbados in the screen grab below, info says about them, that they are using their 501 charity status to receive donations to Archwell from foreign aid in the countries they visit and they get to keep 95% of it, as we know because of them basing arch=unwell in Delaware. If (alledgely) this is true is this why they also went to Jamaica, Canada and intend doing more foreign aid grabs from more Commonwealth countries??. They're in return spend the 5% in the country that donates, better than a washing machine for cleaning things imo.So, imo if the intelligence services can prove this and show it to the King, surely he would then have to act in someway, be it abeyance titles, no titles,or the simpliest option a press release threatening the removal to stop them dead in their tracks. Along the lines of the below----KingCharlesIII has been made aware of multiple infringements and actions no longer in keeping with The Sandringham Summmit Agreement between his son Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and his wife Megan, Duchess of Sussex and The King, and his late mother HRHQEII. STATEMENT TO FOLLOW"It is with a heavy heart, that I must inform you that plans are to be made to move titles into abeyance, and as previously stated they are no longer working royals and therefore not H.R.H. I can no longer ignore the mis-use of said titles and shall be applying to Parliment, for procedures to begin for formal removal of HRH, and Titles previously awarded. These actions are required by myself as His Royal Highness, King of the United Kingdom,and Head of the Commonwealth".The King would like to let it be know that his son and daughter-in-law and grandchildren remain loved members of his family.----------So., was the jam just a distraction, what they're basically doing (imo & alledgley) is using foreign aid from Commonwealth countries to fund their lifestyle? that is pretty despicable, disgusting and most be stopped immediately. Stealing from some of the poorest countries, makes them vile & dangerous.ps. Will the MSM any one of them follow this up?https://ift.tt/fAEq5Wo post link: https://ift.tt/mcfHLSE author: deedee50 submitted: May 16, 2024 at 10:21AM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.

[skippyv20]

Can someone please explain how August who is nearly two years younger than Archie is supposedly Archie? The footage of Eugenie in the Netflix program was likely filmed when she was in town and attended the Super Bowl with Henry. That was Feb. 2022. At that point August had just turned one. August was seen with Eugenie and Jack wearing the sweater with the Union Jack on it during that summer. He was about fifteen months old then. The child on the beach was significantly older than August. The same goes for how is it that he was somehow also filling in for Lilibet. The two are just a few months apart born Feb. and June 2022. I have son and a nephew who in their twenties looked like identical twins. Think King George and Tsar Nicholas. Similarities happen.

I appreciate the explanations.

Also, Eugenie may be just trying to keep family connections with them as they are still family. She was in Santa Barbara in Feb. 2023 for an art show. I don’t think we should just write her off her actions as necessarily nefarious.

Ernest looks so much like Eugenie at the same age going by the new pictures she posted for his birthday. I see Jack and Eugenie in August.

I also see Henry and the Markle family in Lilibet based on the July 4 grainy pics last year.

I am leaning towards surrogacy for the pregnancies as I don not think Rachel would put herself through the IVF process. Her belly during Archie’s pregnancy was so deceitful.

And finally can they please be addressed as either Prince and Princess Henry or The Duke and Duchess of Sussex?

Dian was never Princess Diana. She was Hon. Diana Spencer. The. She became Lady Diana Spencer when her father inherited the Earldomin 1975. Was. She married Charles, she became HRH The Princess of Wales. After their split, she became Diana, Princess of Wales.

Catherine isn HRH The Princess of Wales ( Princess William).

And Rachel Meghan Markle, if you are reading this, you should have seen the vitriol levelled against the ladies marrying into THe Firm in the eighties. I could recount some of that if needed.

Henry’s mother was actually quite damaged and on the outs with many prior to her death, including with her land mine mission.

Her untimely death fuelled by the media and politicians using it for their own purposes helped drive the false “people’s princess” and all that pr.

Thank you 🙂

[duchessofostergotlands]

Is Sarah still the Duchess of York? It seems that she doesn’t use her title , if she does still have it, she doesn’t use it as much as Harry and Meghan who use it for everything.

Sarah uses it regularly. It’s on the front cover of the book she just announced, for example. It's how Eugenie referred to her in the caption of the Anti-Slavery Collective interview earlier this month. It's how she's referred to on the web pages of charities she supports or set up like the Teenage Cancer Trust or Sarah's Trust.

In 1996 the Queen issued a letters patent to clarify the titles of divorced wives of peers. So she was HRH The Duchess of York when she was married and from 1996 onwards she has officially been Sarah, Duchess of York. She has not always stuck to that - sometimes she calls herself The Duchess of York which she shouldn't - but her title is what it is and it would only change if she married someone else.

Harry and Meghan’s titles have not actually changed since they married. They are HRH The Duke of Sussex and HRH The Duchess of Sussex. They voluntarily agreed following their departure that they would choose not to use HRH and so generally go by Prince Harry/Harry, The Duke of Sussex and Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex. That is not officially their title but they choose to use that as a kind of "lower" variation of the official title they do have by law (which anyone could do if they want to; they aren't manipulating their titles to make them sound higher than they are like Sarah sometimes does).

It doesn't matter who uses them more in my opinion because all parties are at present fully within their rights to use the titles they have by law in any way in which they wish to use them.

[houseofbrat]

Did you see that two deranged cambridge stans on your post? They're right on schedule like markle stans lol

Oh, I see all the comments on my posts, even though I usually don't comment.

People are losing their minds over this without thinking any of this through. Mostly because they don't understand the situation or Charles. Instead they're resorting to apocalyptic thinking that would never happen, e.g. Sussex balcony appearances, Archie & Lilibet attending the coronation, etc.

Basically everyone freaking out about this demonstrates that they don't know anything about Charles or his plans to slim the monarchy. Instead, someone who does understand the immediate situation would be River on YouTube. I don't watch River's videos, but someone posted a summary of it on reddit:

In this video River says the following:

Duke and Duchess of South Park were very angry that Archie was not styled a prince when he was born. They refused to acknowledge that letters patent only styles grandchildren of the monarch gets those titles, and at the time the queen was still alive.

Duke and Duchess of South Park refused to use the title Earl of Dumbarton, which is Harry´s secondary title.

Then the Oprah interview happened, where they claimed Archie was not given a title because of racism.

When the queen died, Harry wanted KC to change the letters patent to validate their racism story.

KC did not do so, but did not announce the children´s titles.

And here we are - Duke and Duchess of South Park had to make their royal title announcement via People magazine, and not via a court circular, which is the normal way.

Duke and Duchess were panicking and paranoid, expecting the titles to be taken away.

Harry's wife is panicking. She is not even being photographed with him. He was at a BetterUp event this week. She's been avoiding getting photographed for months, and now she suddenly gets papped and has her lapdog Scobie release photos of her at a charity. Someone is DESPERATE, and it isn't The King.

Everyone freaking out about the titles--and I mean EVERYONE who is acting as if this is the end of the world--is proving that they a) don't understand Charles and b) do not understand the British monarchy.

Twenty years ago, Charles would have been perfectly fine with Beatrice & Eugenie to have been downgraded to daughters of a peer. The person who wasn't down with that change was Queen Elizabeth II.

Guess what? Charles is in charge now. Not QEII.

I'm sure Charles thought the will Louise choose to use her princess title when she turns 18 drama was real cute. Likewise, I doubt he's going to endure that pr drama again in another two and a half years when James turns 18.

I'm sure when Charles issues his letters patent some of the same people whining about the situation now will be whining about how mean Charles is about taking James & Louise's title & styles away. And likely Beatrice & Eugenie's titles & styles as well.

Neither of those four will ever be working royals. Ever.

Does it make sense for Beatrice or Eugenie to be princesses twenty five years from now? When they were never working royals? When they are the first cousin once removed of King George VII? No, it doesn't.

Does it make sense for James or Louise to have the ability to choose to use an HRH style and prince titles 30 years from now either? Or whenever it suits them in the future? No, it doesn't.

This is why the letters patent that Charles will issue will be a big deal. It was never going to solely revolve around the Sussex kids.

But the people whining over the last two days aren't smart enough to realize that.

[candicebella]

[celticcrossanon]

About Harry's losing prince title reading

Hello CC! Thanks for the reading!

From what you read, is the losing of the Prince title being a consequence of an action he does (like attacking again the royal family) done in the public arena that forces Charles to act or is sth that has been planned but they are just waiting for the right moment? If the latter I can understand why as there was a major shift in the monarchy and the consolidation of Charles as monarch is more of a priority than dealing with Harry.

My next question  would be: will the stripping of the princely titles affect the Sussex children as well? It would be weird letting them have the titles while their dad, who they got the title from, is stripped + they don’t live in the UK and don’t know nothing about the British culture

I’ve been thinking about what else can be taken from Harry and there are different options to reduce his status to Duke, but I don’t know if actually possible as I’m not well versed into heraldic rules etc. The King could also remove the Victorian order from H (it’s the medal he usually wears around the neck and the star badge) + forbidding him to use symbols that depicts his status as son of the monarch like the crown on his monogram (he would then be forced to use the duke crown like the aristocratic ones) and change his coat of arms to mirror his duke status. For this latter option I don’t know if it’s possible or not as his current coat of arms derives from his dad’s and mirrors his status as son of the king (not officially updated yet)

Another thing Charles could do is officially removing Meghan’s coat of arms. After what she did she really doesn’t deserve to keep that present from the late Queen + the use of the royal monogram

What’s your thoughts?

Thank you in advance 😘 

*

Hi Nonny,

I think it is a bit of both. I think the BRF have planned for removing Harry’s titles, but it is a last resort action, and the question then becomes does Harry’s actions call for that last resort to be implemented? So far the answer has been No, but you never know what he will do in the future that may change that No to a Yes. I didn’t get a ‘done deal’ feeling from the energy of the reading, so I think this is something that they are still discussing, not something that they are ready to announce.

Stripping Harry of his Prince title will mean that he is Harry, The Duke of Sussex, not HRH The Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex. Meghan takes her titles from him so she would keep The Duchess of Sussex title and lose the Princess Henry title. The children received their titles from being the male line grandchildren of the King so AFAIK they would keep their titles in this situation, unless their parents refused the titles on behalf of the children (like Lady Louise, who is technically HRH Princess Louise, but Edward and Sophie decided that she would be styled as the daughter of an Earl (now the daughter of a Duke) rather than as a Princess).  

Anyone who knows any differently, feel free to let me know. :)

I don’t think Orders of Chivalry can be removed for anything less than confirmed treason, so Harry has his Victorian Order for life. I could be wrong about this.

If Harry is entitled to a certain crown above his monogram etc then the only thing the BRF can do is say that he is not allowed to use it, and we have seen how well he follows that order with his HRH.

A coat of arms, once given, can not be taken away except for cases of treason AFAIK, and in that case the coat of arms is usually marked with a sign of dishonour (again, AFAIK).

Taking away the monograms etc would look like petty behaviour on behalf of the BRF and feed into Meghan’s victim narrative. 

What I am hoping is that both Harry and his children are legally removed from the Line of Succession, and I am hoping that this is the hinted-at bombshell that is coming in the Northern Hemisphere Spring. Once that happens, they can be stripped of the HRH Prince/Princess titles as they are no longer in the Line of Succession, and revert to The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their children, the Earl of Dumbarton and Lady Lili - or Archie and Lili Mountbatten Windsor if the parents do not want to use the courtesy titles for their children.

[meghantheduchess]

How stunning does HRH Princess Meghan The Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry the Duke of Sussex look in Nigeria!! 🇳🇬

[sassyfrassboss]

I'm pretty sure he can. If his great-great uncle can give up a kingdom than he should be able to give up a dukedom.

>>I think the issue though is that Harry has to give up the dukedom before the divorce. Otherwise Meghan can still call herself Duchess of Sussex because that was her legal married name. If Harry gives up the dukedom before the divorce, their surname becomes Mountbatten-Windsor and Meghan has no claim to Sussex.

I’m now thinking about their PR that they were changing their surnames to Spencer. That was a really random piece of PR and hindsight being 20/20, I’m now wondering if they really are (or were) discussing the title for the divorce. Especially since all of Meghan’s solo branding since the Jubilee has been “Meghan” (and particularly for Archetypes) - no title, no HRH, no royal anything. (Which seems contradictory because she makes anyone who refers to her as “Meghan” in their articles or social media change it to Duchess of Sussex”.)

Oh...I didn't think of that.

The Spencer thing was so random but I can see her being "Meghan Spencer" and having "Princess Lilibet Diana Spencer" as her sidekick.

I don't think Harry will give up the title because he will want Archie to have it one day. He can't have William's sons having a Duke title and not his own.

[harry-sussex]

It doesn’t matter if Harry and his family live in the US, in Thailand, in the middle of the Arctic Ocean, or on Jupiter’s third moon - they’re all HRH. Doesn’t matter if they can use the title where they are or for what they’re doing - that’s not how this works. At the end of the day, no matter what, as it stands right now, they’re HRH The Duke of Sussex, HRH The Duchess of Sussex, HRH Prince Archie of Sussex, and HRH Princess Lilibet of Sussex. That’s the rule. Duke and Duchess, Prince and Princess.

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

I do think it was agreed that A & L would be Lord/lady but there wasn’t anything in stone to stop the duo saying that A & L were Prince and Princess after 2022 and that is the issue I think the family were blindsided as they did it after beloved mother, grandmother & great-grandmother just died and everyone was prepping for the coronation which took a lot of time and energy to get together

Correct, and that’s where going back to enforce the terms of the Sandringham Summit is critical. Those terms include that Harry and Meghan wouldn’t use their titles or HRH, which also meant that Archie and Lili couldn’t use titles if/when they received them.

That the BRF felt blindsided by the Sussexes’ decision after The Queen died is an excuse, because Archie and Lili using the titles wasn’t announced for another full 6 months afterwards; plenty of time for Charles and his staff to do something once the immediate mourning was over. Instead, he rolled over and announced their use of titles in a shit sandwich - Edward and Sophie promoted to Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, the kids are using titles, and Frogmore taken from the Sussexes.

But woulda coulda shoulda.