god, i finally have healthy attachment to the void state.
i just had this eye-opening realization that i used to see the void as the ultimate form of validation, not just fulfillment/instant manifestation (what i thought the story was about). but i was looking at the void as this magical place to affirm what i desire, and then i would know it was instantly true/would work.
which makes me ask: as opposed to what?? what am i implying about myself with this assumption?
i realize now that i didn't see myself as the final word. this narrative was never about the void state; it was always about me (since everything is, ofc), and i was using this story to remind myself that i am not the voice of truth; i am not the ultimate validation. i must access this state of consciousness (which i perceive as something to be separate and greater than me) to know my word will be honored (which also makes me ask: honored by whom??).
so, yes, i can desire to tap into the void state as an expression of wanting to know more of what i already am. i can still use it to shift/manifest (same thing). but i'm no longer seeing it as something greater or more powerful than myself (it's all just me anyway). now, i trust my word to be honored no matter what because i am god. i am all that is. and ofc, i am the void, too.
i swear, the answer to everything really is unity. i need nothing but me because i am all things, and i am all that i desire to be.
(i've also been listening to my unbothered/nonattachment sub, and i 100% think this helped with this shift, too.)
259 notes
·
View notes
there goes my favorite drawing software ...
i defended their plans for the version2 and all, bc i didnt see much wrong with it and liked csp alot, but i guess i should have become a hater back then already
after that one big mistake that sparked so much outrage they really said but how can we actually lose EVERYONE, they saw deviantart doing it and thought BET I CAN DO IT FASTER
(they say they dont use user data but are basing it on stable diffusion of all things, they literally only ask people to think morally/ethically when using it to not use stolen stuff like thats ever worked with anything ever, plus "we cant guarantee that there will be no copyright infringement" OH YOU DONT SAY)
4K notes
·
View notes
[Image description: a digital drawing of sklonda and pok gukgak from fantasy high, two goblins with shoulder length straight hair and short curly hair, respectively. they're touching foreheads and embracing, both of sklonda's hands in pok's hair, while one of pok's hands is moving sklonda's bangs off her foreheads and the other is clutching at her waist. we only see sklonda's face and the look of silent grief on it. in the background on pok's half is a stylized dragon's mouth with teeth digging into his shoulder, and on sklonda's side are sheets of paper. over the background on the left is text that reads, it's okay, and then on the right side in brackets it says, (it'll be ok). End image description]
173 notes
·
View notes