Loki isnt selfish for wanting to save the universe because of his friends. He has never truly felt loved before and now that he understands that feeling he has something to protect. He understands why everyone else cares so much. This is his universe. His glorious purpose.
293 notes
·
View notes
envisioning myself as the creator of my pride for a second… i feel like if i was setting up a pairing where one character has been systemically abused for being disabled and female most of her life, and the romantic interest was introduced to her by…. having said romantic interest mock her for being systemically abused…. i would not have that be the setup for an uwu true love prevails story. i would more likely portray that as nothing clinging onto hover because she’s got no support back home and she’s better than her abusive mother and sisters at least, but the relationship is still not great because both characters are incompatible and do not respect each other, and nothing has been primed to take abuse in all of her relationships anyways. its just another rough journey for nothing to clear, not her happy ending.
15 notes
·
View notes
My favorite headcanon rn is that with time Mobius starts resenting Loki, kinda becomes a mess in the timeline (drugs, alcohol, hair growing wild, etc) and when Sylvie tries to talk with him and suggests Loki is worried he replies bitterly as if Loki doesn't give a shit about him and mocks about her seeing Loki which makes her mad at his attitude like "he did this for you, for us!" and he explodes at her and says that "when Loki made that decision he thought about literally everyone else in the universe but me" and yells at her to tell Loki to fuck off next time they have their love meeting. Meanwhile in the distance, Loki's slow working brain is having a meltdown listening to all that and realizing what it means. I loooove drama btw.
51 notes
·
View notes
"wa wa he's rude :(" if you lot realized how rude (and invasive and creepy and out of line and disturbing and presumptuous and prying) you've been for more than a decade, you'd spontaneously combust out of the amount of shame you would rightfully finally feel.
60 notes
·
View notes
People are arguing about the effectiveness/moralness of self immolation as a protest tactic in the notes of my post and I neeeed y'all to know you are part of the fucking problem. You are absolutely part of the problem.
Self immolation SHOULD be effective. Something that extreme should be effective (though, obviously not encouraged, please do not kill yourselves) and being dismissive of it and immediately positioning yourself as like... more politically savvy than the person who literally JUST killed themselves is fucking disgusting.
Watching a clip as a man slowly crumbles into himself as he is burned alive and saying "This accomplishes nothing" is gross and if you think my post was doing that, I have failed. Pointing out political action is rarely recorded in the history books wasn't me saying it does nothing--it was me saying "history books" love to suppress actual history if it doesn't fit their narrative. If it threatens the status quo and might inspire others to work for change and strike out against structural powers.
Obviously, no one single act or person can totally change everything. There is no radical shift from one life taken (and his life WAS taken by this administration more than it was taken by himself).
It's about the collective total of ALL of our actions--the big, the small, the palatable, and the ugly, which this was. There's a REASON why the press is refusing to report on his death accurately and there is a REASON he went out of his way to fight that and document his death so clearly, identifying himself, live streaming, declaring his intent and cause with his last fucking breath.
It's because his actions do inspire change when properly witnessed. This isn't something that is meant to make Biden go "Oh, shit, stop the genocide" but it is meant to wake up everyone else. People who loved him, people who served with him, people who didn't serve with him but also feel trapped by military contracts, people who felt the genocide was bad but hadn't quite been pushed to action yet.
Viewing this as a singular political event that was intended to change everything shows YOU are the one who doesn't know what is or isn't effective. Political action is ALWAYS about the COLLECTIVE impact and about mobilizing a larger front.
Immediately dismissing what he did as mentally ill or well-intentioned but ineffective is kneecapping the impact. Just so you can feel smug. It's the same energy as people saying donating in small amounts won't do anything, even if those donations add up to something large.
It's obvious to me when y'all are saying shit just to make yourselves feel above everyone else. Where you're doing everything just to prove you're a smart, moral person. Nothing is derived from empathy or thinking of the collective. It's just about you.
Nevermind that even if it is "ineffective," how fucking dare you look at someone driven to one of the most painful forms of suicide, using his final moments to desperately cry for change and say his death doesn't matter. How fucking dare you. Genuinely, what is wrong with you?
21 notes
·
View notes
One TF fandom argument that confuses me is when people put Megatron and Starscream versus each other like, when people say that it's "unfair that Megatron gets redemption but Starscream doesn't" (in regards to IDW1) because like. One, IDW1 in phase 2 was written by like 4 different writers, so you can't try to claim that there was some unified vision where the nonexistent Singular Writer of IDW was like "no Starscream isn't allowed to have nice things."
And second, I don't think the writers would even think of it that way? It's not like the writers were like "okay we have one Get Out Of Jail Free Card and we're going to spend it on Megatron, sorry Starscream maybe in the next reboot you can get it." The divisions fans make between X character likers and Y character likers are completely made up fandom drama and sometimes I feel like people don't understand that the writers aren't privy to fandom infighting/drama and wouldn't write Megatron and Starscream in opposition to each other as if one character's gain must come at the other's expense.
And finally............. IDW1 Starscream literally does get to be portrayed as a more morally gray person, have his feelings shown and treated as human, even make some friends/have people treat him nicely? IDK what fucking comics people are reading where they think that Starscream is treated as an evil villain with no redeeming qualities at all. Maybe it's the same Starscream fans who shit on TAAO/Scott or something, that's the only way I could explain it.
100 notes
·
View notes