#multiple excel to one

[poorly-drawn-mdzs]

I don't know if you're aware, but MXTX absolutely doesn't allow any profiting off fan merch for their series. So I'd be more careful about any mdzs related physical item project. Even if you're beyond their copyrights reach, it's a courtesy to honor the author's wishes

Anon saving me from drinking the Copyright Soup.

[primus-why]

I love the idea of Ratchet being captured while badly injured. It wasn't necessarily on purpose-- he knows the Cons would love to take him prisoner in order to utilize his medical skills, he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Once they realized he was a medic they pulled him from the rubble and got him on a slab pretty quickly all things considered. The trouble is there's a reason the Cons value medical expertise-- he's bleeding out, they don't have enough supplies, and at this rate Ratchet knows he's gonna die. So with whatever strength he can muster he gets the attention of one of the grunts working on him.

Ratchet: H... hey... I need you... to pass on a message...

Con 1: To who, your Prime? Not gonna happen.

Con 2: Yeah we don't really do the 'any last words' thing.

Ratchet: No... *wheeze* to Deadlock.

Con 1 & 2: *go still*

Ratchet: Tell 'im... I'll... be waiting... for him...

Con 2: Wait a klik...

Con 1: ... You don't think--?

Con 2: -- Frag! Oh frag!! His vitals!!! Dealock is gonna kill us!!

Con 1: Scrap! Get Soundwave on the line, have him patch to the DJD!

Con 2: He's not gonna make it! I don't want them to know my face!

Con 1: It. won't. matter. If we wait, it'll look worse!

Con 2: Oh Primus, I hope they don't pick up...

Con 1: Just go!!!

Ratchet: ... I'm waitin' to... kick his aft... *passes out*

[urfavcrime]

dsmp is still SO insane to me. still not completely convinced it wasn't a social experiment. it is something that can never be replicated again due to the really specific circumstances that attributed to it's creation and popularity

[ganondoodle]

hot take of the day; something that would have made the bs time travel in totk at least FEEL a little more like there is literally any seperation between the present and the past is .. language barrier

just having zelda be unable to properly communicate with anyone from the past would have made it a lot more reasonable why she couldnt get them to listen to her, bc they literally couldnt, instead of rauru dismissing all her concerns like an ass it would have been interesting and elevated the tension somewhat to have them both struggle to understand (and as a plus also perhaps make it hard for rauru to tell you waht the fuck is going on at the start instead of just not telling you for no god damn reason)

that is harder to do with voice acting, but imo that was a mistake anyway, in neither game there are scenes i can think of that have action that couldnt be paused for text boxes and putting in a different language would have been easy to do this way, similar like in windwaker (also replay value? having it first be not understandable and the second time you udnerstand what they say?), and neither games are that narrative focused to begin with (stupidly enough) .... and alot ... majority of the voice acting sucks anyway (its not like all english voice actors are bad, have you heard elden rings voice actors?? hello??), i know i cant speak for everyone but after a few scenes i couldnt take anything seriously anymore (bc of .. how totk IS) EVEN THOUGH i played with japanese voices, which at least sounded like they were trying at all, i still cant wrap my head around anyone being able to listen to the most fake, forced or just unfitting voices in english i have ever heard and being immersed in it (on top of it just being not well written or paced or .. anything)

[harpoonsnotspoons]

Cue air guitar

[rolandkaros]

16 years of formal education could not get me to learn excel but 1 year of being really into tennis did.

[herawell]

.

[unopenablebox]

well. i hope that guy is ok with me posting their weaving on tumblr. oops

[bookwyrminspiration]

trying to get shit sorted out for fall semester but no one is back in office until it starts is. not ideal

[gibbearish]

btw similar to the whole "if you try adderall at a party and it calms you down, get an adhd test" thing, if at some point in your life you try microdosing shrooms with a friend and end up feeling like a functional person for the first time in your life, get tested for depression. like yeah hallucinogens come with elation so youre probably gonna have some "this is the best ive ever felt in my life" vibes regardless, but like. if that in and of itself feels like finally breathing in for the first time in years, thats for sure a sign that something is up with your ability to process serotonin most of the time. feeling better than ever before should be a nice bonus, not a crushing weight off your chest

[astrangergivingthestrangewelcome]

Hehe validation at work

[philtstone]

it is appearing that .... how u say .... the mollyverse origins fic may have to be a chapter fic

[kits-ghosts-corner]

Yeah, again, that means nothing. What does a "little" seuxal attraction mean? Compared to who? How do you know? Does gay mean "little to no sexual attraction to the other gender?" No, it doesn't. Because being attracted to multiple genders would make you bi. Just like a gay man who wants to have sex with women isn't a gay man.

Asexuality means nothing because it isn't tied to anything. If wanting to have sex is included in asexuality, gay men wanting to have sex with women would be included in homosexualiyt.

Asexuality has no boundaries and communicates nothing.

The “little to” is compared to the average person’s rates of sexual attraction, if I can put it like that - the usual lack of sexual attraction to other people is the more important part. Asexual folks won’t see most people as hot, even those who are considered stereotypically attractive. Allo people are more likely to feel something whilst watching some shit like Love Island, asexuals won’t. That’s basically it. How do I know…? I’m not sure what exactly that’s referring to, but I’m going to assume it’s knowing I’m asexual - I don’t find anyone attractive. I know that. That’s a bit like asking “how do you know you aren’t hungry” - it’s harder to describe an absence of something than a presence of it.

I’ll point you in the direction of plenty of people having random folks who are “exceptions” to their sexualities; straight men who say their “exception” is Ryan Reynolds, for example, or gay women who say their “exception” is Hozier. We can argue back and forth if those examples are always meant seriously or not, but the fact is that human experiences are varied, and people can still call themselves by certain labels even if they have their own sort of exceptions. Nobody will turn around and suddenly shout “well, if you have this random one-off, then you can’t label yourself as that!”, that just doesn’t happen (at least, I’ve never seen that beyond the internet). The world is a complicated thing and if someone feels a label fits them, then there’s really no need to waste breathe and argue with them about their reasonings. I’m sure you have better things to do than trying to convince people online that asexuality isn’t real (I think that’s you’re trying to argue here).

Asexuality can be different from talking about homosexuality or heterosexuality because it’s an absence of something, or a very great lack of something; I used the metaphor of describing not being hungry before, and I think it’s worth bringing up here again. It’s really simple to describe hunger, but not easy to describe not being hungry at all. People will describe sexual attraction as all matter of things, and it’s much more difficult for me to say “well I never feel any of that”.

Asexuality is tied to a lack of sexual attraction or none entirely (“lack of” being in comparison to most people). Asexuality does have boundaries, but it’s almost like everybody has their own boundaries because people are people and experience things in different ways to their levels of enjoyment. That doesn’t make asexuality less valid. And it still communicates plenty of things - people’s boundaries in regards to sex, how they view themselves and their experience, etc. - it just seems that’s you’re just not willing to understand those or listen to asexual experiences.

[musical-chick-13]

Regarding the previous post, I think the way I approach trying to evaluate a piece of art is asking "Do I think the positive things I get out of it outweigh the parts of it that I don't like?" And when I call something a "guilty pleasure" song/show/book/piece of media/etc. it's really more in the sense of, "Given who I am as a person, the flaws I've found in this should be complete dealbreakers for me, but somehow they aren't, and it makes me feel like I'm having an identity crisis."

[nathanialhowe]

man im a helly r lover first and foremost and yet and yet and yet her stuff with mark makes me snooze. im sorry i cant do it . like you have her scenes w jame being the most riveting things in the show and then. 'girl meets boy' hetero romance. please. please. im begging you.

[deathsmallcaps]

So, I was just looking for a Snow White gif set, and I came across quite a few posts expressing displeasure about Rachel Zegler’s flippant attitude to the original Disney film. And while I agree she was being a bit glib, you have to remember, it’s all about playing it up for the camera. Maybe her manager told her to push a love-to-hate-it angle. Who knows. Disney is still trying to work that little bit of feminism that is truly marketable but is ‘safe’ in their standards.

But what irritates me is that those posts immediately delve into the history and animation of the work in the film. As an artist, I totally respect the work and success Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was in 1937. It’s a beautiful piece, to be sure.

And Snow White was kind of modern for the movie’s supposed setting and time period! She has a bob! It’s easily demonstrated and acknowledged by the audience how hard she works, in both the castle and the cottage! She’s a upper class woman who manages to stay chaste despite living with, horror among horrors, seven unmarried men!

But, come on. She was relatively safe, barely pushing the envelope, in 1937. Women were in factories, wearing pants, and were still actively fighting for their rights at the time. All while weathering the Great Depression!

Films like Mirror Mirror and Snow White and the Huntsman have already done more-feminine-modern takes on the tale. But Zegler isn’t wrong. If the original film’s story, no changes, came out today, it would be disappointing to a lot of feminists. So if you’ve watched the other live action Disney princess films, I’d say don’t knock the Snow White one just yet. It might actually offer something new but nice to more modern feminist audiences.

Just please don’t forget that something can be wonderful in one way and meh in another. The original film was an artistic masterpiece, but wasn’t the be-all end-all of feminism in the 30s. Check out this film, for example.

And hey, this is the webbed site of anxiety. You’ve all probably said things you regret, whether you ‘deserve’ to regret it or not. Don’t forget actors can make mistakes too. They’re human.