#randall r graves

[riiddle-me-thii2]

⁠✯ Intro Post

my old intro got deleted i think ?? heres the new one

☆ minor - 14

☆ it/he - ftm

☆ multifandom + multiship

☆ autistic bisexual objectum selfshipper

☆ proship / profic + propara anti-c / comp-c

☆ DNI: anti-proship/fic/para, anti-agere/petre, pro-c for harmful paras

☆ i draw stuff sometimes (not very good at it)

✿ tags -

⁠☆ zero barking - my posts/not reposts ♡ scott posting - posts about my ds lite (Scott) ✧ zero draws - drawings :3

characters i selfship with r under the cut :P

a little hesitant with sharing (especially with the starred ones) i have more but i dont talk about them as much :P

★ Gideon Graves - Scott Pilgrim (movie, comics, game and show)

★ Charles Foster Offdensen - Metalocalypse

Scout - Team Fortress 2

Herbert West - Re-Animator

Strade - Boyfriend To Death

Luther Von Ivory - Randal's Friends

i also love love love my DS lite (Scott) and older computers. also any tech with a clear case and circuit boards :3

[thelonecalzone]

The Unaired Two-Page Conversation

I think we're past the point of possible spoilers, so as promised: the 2pg book conversation that was cut for time (and realism). Originally, I was experimenting with "unsent" books as part of the conversations, but I thought it would ultimately be too confusing and opted not to use that, so anything you see with a strikethrough is an "unsent" book.

(If this text formatting is ultra zany and hard to read, someone please tell me and I'll make it more regular. Allison is Blue, Patty is Red... for reasons... 🫠)

Allison: It’s Lonely at the Center of the Earth, by Zoe Thorogood

Patty: Not Here, by Hieu Minh Nguyen

Allison: Tell Me Everything, by Minka Kelly

Patty: Daily Rituals, by Phoebe Garnsworthy

Patty: Drinking Coffee Elsewhere, ZZ Packer

Patty: Crime, by Irvine Welsh

Allison: Without Me? by Chelle Bliss

Allison: Exciting Times, by Naoise Dolan

Patty: Not Without You, by Harriet Evans

Patty: The Page Turner, by David Leavitt

Allison: I Got a Job and It Wasn’t That Bad, by Scott Dikkers

Patty: Really Moving On, by Pierre Jeanty

Patty: What Kind of Job Can a Monkey Do? by Sato Akira

Allison: Hey Rick! Don’t Be So Rude! by Alyssa Thompson

Patty: I Like Monkeys, by Peter Hansard

Allison: So You Like Me Too, by OPR

Patty: The Miseducation of Cameron Post, by Emily M. Danforth

Allison: Just Say Yes, by Niobia Bryant

Patty: Yes, Chef, by Marcus Samuelsson

Patty: Get to the Point, by Joel Schwartzberg

Allison: I Miss You, by Pat Thomas

Allison: Without You, by Saskia Sarginson

Allison: You’re, by Keisha Ervin

Allison: I Got My Dream Job and So Can You, by Pete Leibman 

Patty: Super Spy, by Matt Kindt

Allison: The Librarian Spy, by Madeline Martin

Patty: For the Love of Books, by Graham Tarrant

Allison: Reminds Me of You, by Retno Handini

Allison: For the Thrill of It, by Simon Baatz

Patty: Run Towards the Danger, by Sarah Polley

Allison: Risking it All, by Tessa Bailey

Patty: Risk (With Me), by Sue Wilder

Patty: Ambitious Girl, by Meena Harris

Allison: Yeah, Right, by Jim and Helen Fox

Patty: The Follow-Through Factor: Getting from Doubt to Done, by Gene C. Hayden

Allison: A Stroke of Dumb Luck, by Shiloh Walker

Patty: Credit Where Credit is Due, by Frank Casey

Allison: Optimists Die First, by Susin Neilsen

Patty: The Price of Immortality, by Peter Ward

Allison: Death Visits the Hair Salon, by Amy Anderson

Patty: Murder in the Library, by Katie Gayle

Allison: Sounds Like Fun, by Bryan Moriarty

Patty: I Have More Fun With You Than Anybody, by Lige Clark

Patty: Certifiably Insane, by Arthur W. Bahr

Allison: Charming as a Verb, by Ben Philippe

Patty: How Do You Manage? by John Nicholson

Allison: Liquor, by Poppy Z. Brite

Patty: Hardly Know Her, by Laura Lippman

Allison: Don’t Be Gross, by Barbara Bakos

Patty: It’s Just Anatomy! by Ellen

Allison: Rough Transition, by Patrick Kelley

Patty: Some Girls Like it Rough, by Marlo Peterson

Allison: What Sort of Girls Were They? by Petrea Leslie

Patty: Girls with Bright Futures, by Tracy Dobmeier

Allison: I’m a Little Ghost and I Like the Dark, by Lynda Kimmel

Patty: Dark As the Grave Wherein My Friend Is Laid, by Malcolm Lowrey

Allison: Murder in the Dark, by Simon R. Green

Patty: My Job Was To Bring The Shovel, by Randall M. Rueff

Allison: The Complete Accomplice, by Steve Aylett

Patty: The Magician’s Assistant, by Ann Patchett

Allison: The Witch’s Familiar, by Raven Grimassi

Patty: Witch Minion, by Lissa Kasey

Allison: These Witches Don’t Burn, by Isabel Sterling

Patty: The Drowning Kind, by Jennifer McMahon

Allison: A Touch Morbid, by Leah Clifford

Patty: Lucy Clark Will Not Apologize, by Margo Rabb

Allison: I Wonder What She’s Doing Tonight, by James Hold

Patty: Whiskey, Words, and a Shovel, by R. H. Sin

Allison: Sounds Perfect, by Ashley Boren

Patty: How I Made a Friend, Daniel Georges

Allison: Good For You (Between the Lines), by Tammara Webber

Patty: We’re Very Good Friends, by P.K. Hallinan

Allison: Sounds Fake, But Okay, by Sarah Costello

Patty: What If It’s True? by Charles Martin

Allison: What If It Wasn’t? by Ivan Itch

Patty: Why Do You Care? by Saju Skaria

Allison: I’m Fine and Neither Are You, by Camille Pagán

Allison: The Replacement Part, by Nora Wylde

Patty: Just a Friend, by Ashley Nicole

Allison: How to Kill Your Best Friend, by Lexie Elliott

Patty: You’re All Just Jealous of My Jetpack, by Tom Gauld

Allison: Dead Jealous, by Sharon Jones

Patty: You’ve Got to Have Friends, by Delbert George Fitzpenfield Anthony

Allison: Everything I Need I Get From You, by Kaitlyn Tiffany

Allison: Among Other Things, by Robert Long Foreman

Allison: Truths I Learned from Sam, ​​by Kristin Butcher

Patty: The Idiot King, by Patty Jansen

Allison: He Helped Me Climb the Mountain, by Betty E. Wright

Patty: The Man Who Pushed His Wife off a Cliff, by Will D. Burn

Patty: Men are Trash, by Salman Faris 

Patty: And That’s Why I Think I Prefer A Rainbow Horse, by Tiarra Nazario

Patty: Sam Houston’s Wife, by William Seale

Allison: What About Her, by Emma Tharpe

Patty: Amelia Bedelia Sleeps Over, by Herman Parish

Patty: The Undead in my Bed, by Katie McAlister

Allison: Sleeping with the Enemy, by Nancy Price

Allison: How Could You Do That?! by Laura Schlessinger

Allison: How Could You Murder Us? by Charae Lewis

Allison: Why Her? by Nicki Koziarz

Allison: I Hate You, Don’t Leave Me, by Jerold J. Kreisman

Patty: I Was Joking, Of Course, by Paul Jennings

Allison: Liar, by Tate James

Patty: What if I Say the Wrong Thing? by Verna A Myers

Allison: Don’t Look Back, by Josh Lanyon

Patty: Come Back, by Sally Crosiar

Patty: SHIT, by Shahnon Ahmad

Patty: Barbie: It Takes Two, by Grace Baranowski

Allison: I Changed My Mind, by Jimmy Evans

Allison: Allison Hewitt Is Trapped, by Madeleine Roux

Patty: Are You Still There, by Sara Lynn Schreeger

Patty: Wait for Me, by Caroline Leech

Allison: Look Back, by Tatsuki Fujimoto

[richdadpoor]

US Congress Launches Historic Stadium Caucus to Protect The Nation's Historic Sports Venues

WASHINGTON D.C. (CelebrityAccess) — US Representatives Garret Graves (R–Louisiana) and Mark Pocan (D–Wisconsin) announced the launch of the Historic Stadium Caucus, bringing together a bipartisan group of legislators who will work to protect and enhance historic stadiums in the U.S. “Historic stadiums, like Camp Randall Stadium where the University of Wisconsin-Madison Badgers play, serve a vital…

[mrbluebeard666]

:3c

[motionpicturelover]

Films I've watched in 2022

(Click on the title to see the post. This list will be continously updated.)

For a list of the first 100, see this post.

101 - 199:

🗓 June:

🎬 "La Tête en Friche" (2010) - Jean Becker

🎬 "Loulou" (1979) - Maurice Pialat

🎬 "Les Fugitifs" (1986) - Francis Veber

🎬 "Diamant 13" (2009) - Gilles Béhat

🎬 "Änglar finns dom?" (1961) - Lars-Magnus Lindgren

🎬 "Hamlet" (1996) - Kenneth Branagh

🎬 "102 Dalmatians" (2000) ‐ Kevin Lima

🗓 July:

🎬 "Fleabag" series 1 (2016)

🎬 "Fleabag" series 2 (2019)

🎬 "Käre John" (1964) - Lars-Magnus Lindgren

🎬 "I lånte fjær" (1992) - Åse Vikene

🎬 "Charleys Tant" (2015) - Anders Aldgård

🎬 "De två saliga" (1986) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Skönheten och Odjuret" (1991) - Gary Trousdale and Kirk Wise

🎬 "Karins ansikte" (1983) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Alfred" (1995) - Vilgot Sjöman

🎬 "En lektion i kärlek" (1954) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Appasionata" (1944) - Olof Molander

🎬 "Nattvardsgästerna" (1963) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Sommarlek" (1951) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Ingmar Bergman Intermezzo" (2002)

🎬 "Kvinna utan ansikte" (1947) - Gustaf Molander

🎬 "Såsom i en spegel" (1961) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Riten" (1969) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Persona" (1966) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "The Serpent's Egg" (1977) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Torn Curtain" (1966) - Alfred Hitchcock

🎬 "En passion" (1969) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Det sjunde inseglet" (1957) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Skammen" (1968) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Vargtimmen" (1968) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Smultronstället" (1957) - Ingmar Bergman

🗓 August:

🎬 "The Exorcist" (1973) - William Friedkin

🎬 "Sons of Anarchy" season 2 (2009)

🎬 "Efter repetitionen" (1984) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Bergman Island" (2004) - Marie Nyreröd

🎬 "Saraband" (2003) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Markisinnan de Sade" (1991) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Fårö-dokument 1979" (1979) - Ingmar Bergman

🎬 "Maîtresse" (1975) - Barbet Schroeder

September:

🎬 "Baby frei Haus (2009) - Franziska Mayer Price

🎬 "I Bergmans regi" (2003)

🎬 "Shallow Grave" (1993) - Danny Boyle

🎬 "Du kan da ikke bare gå" (1985) - Terje Mærli

🎬 "La ditt problem bli vårt problem" (1969) - Egil Kolstø

🎬 "Katteslottet" (1966) - Knut Thomassen

🎬 "Fox Grønland" sesong 1 (2001)

🎬 "Hilsen fra Bertha" (1968) - Jon Heggedal

🎬 "Søndag ettermiddag" (1967) - Tore Breda Thoresen

🎬 "The Hours" (2002) - Stephen Daldrey

🎬 "Elskeren" (1964) - Michael Elliott

🎬 "George Carlin on Location" (1977)

🎬 "The Addams Family" (1991) - Barry Sonnenfeld

🎬 "Kiss Me Petruchio" (1981) - Christopher Dixon

🎬 "A Midsummer Night's Sex Comedy" (1982) - Woody Allen

🎬 "Play it Again, Sam" (1972) - Herbert Ross

🎬 "Mack the Knife" (1989) - Menahem Golan

🎬 "Ripe Strawberries" (1980) - E. Randal Hoey

🎬 "Hell on Earth" (2002) - Paul Joyce

🎬 "The Devils" (1971) - Ken Russell

🎬 "Women in Love" (1969) - Ken Russell

🗓 October:

🎬 "The Breakfast Club" (1985) - John Hughes

🎬 "St. Elmo's Fire" (1985) - Joel Schumacher

🎬 "Burnt Offerings" (1976) - Dan Curtis

🎬 "Peer Gynt" (2006) - Bentein Baardson

🎬 "Når vi døde vågner" (1973) - Per Bronken

🎬 "Peer Gynt" (1986) - Edith Roger

🎬 "Ghost" (1990) - Jerry Zucker

🎬 "Dead Ringers" (1988) - David Cronenberg

🎬 "The Cassandra Crossing" (1976) - George Pan Cosmatos

🎬 "This is Paris" (2020) - Alexandra Dean

🎬 "This Sporting Life" (1963) - Lindsay Anderson

🎬 "Golden Rendezvous" (1977) - Ashley Lazarus

🎬 "Gulliver's Travels" (1977) Peter R. Hunt

🎬 "Alive and Kicking" (1959) - Cyril Frankel

🎬 "Highpoint" (1982) - Peter Carter

🗓 November:

🎬 "Gladiator" (2000) - Ridley Scott

🎬 "How to Steal a Million" (1966) - William Wyler

🎬 "The Damned" (1962) - Joseph Losey

🎬 "The Wild Geese" (1978) - Andrew V. McLaglen

🎬 "Under Milk Wood" (1971) - Andrew Sinclair

🎬 "Deep Red" ("Profondo Rosso") (1975) - Dario Argento

🎬 "The Hunchback" (1997) - Peter Medak

🎬 "Unforgiven" (1992) - Clint Eastwood

🎬 "The Trap" (1966) - Sidney Hayers

🎬 "Absolution" (1978) - Anthony Page

🎬 "The Mouse That Roared" (1959) - Jack Arnold

🎬 "Carry On Up the Jungle" (1970) - Gerald Thomas

🎬 "Smashing Time" (1967) - Desmond Davis

🎬 "The Lion in Winter" (1968) - Anthony Harvey

🎬 "Assault In Paradise" (1977) - Richard Compton

🎬 "Circle of Two" (1981) - Jules Dassin

🎬 "Julie & Julia" (2009) - Nora Ephron

🎬 "What's New Pussycat?" (1965) - Clive Donner

🎬 "The Night of the Iguana" (1964) - John Huston

🎬 "The Spy Who Came in from the Cold" (1965) - Martin Ritt

🎬 "My Favorite Year" (1982) - Richard Benjamin

🎬 "Beat Girl" (1960) - Edmond T. Gréville

🎬 "The Debussy Film" (1965) - Ken Russell

[encrucijada]

FROM THE MOUTHS WITH NO TONGUE by ester cuervos

a re-introduction !

✧ genre: murder mystery, low fantasy ✧ category: adult ✧ pov: second person retrospective in a loose journal format ✧ witches, full latine cast, small town you can’t escape from, horror movie one-by-one deaths, dumbass young adults, lgbtqa+, spanglish, found family, an all-girls boarding school ✧ cw: mental illness, complicated families, suicide, bigotry, death and gore ✧ themes: collective paranoia, “people fear what they cannot understand”, outcasts ✧ tone: eerie, suffocating, whimsical, wary, anxious

a b o u t : small town princesa gloria exists in a liminal space and the warnings about not going into the forest at night are to be believed. marjorie de los ángeles is the youngest member of the local witch family and aside from eating animal tongues she’s just another student of the local all-girls boarding school. senior year isn’t the optimal time to find a classmate hung in the forest. marjorie is faced with the mystery of who is causing these seemingly random murders, all in an effort to take the blame off herself and her family. she is not doing the smart thing and leaving until she convinces her grandmother to do so as well or until she finds the culprit.

c h a r a c t e r s: ✧ marjorie de los ángeles cruz. she/they. demisexual. dresses like the kid whose mum let them dress themself on the first day of kindergarten. has adhd. witch. ✧ archie randall rojas. he/him. gay. marjorie’s best friend and baby daddy (long story). dancer. “talk shit, get hit”. was practically adopted into mj’s family. ✧ lorelai jarros quintana. she/they. lesbian. marjorie’s girlfriend and classmate in boarding school. artist. “hold my earrings i’m gonna kick this bitch’s ass”. ✧ dulce maría de los ángeles ugalde. she/her. aromantic. marjorie’s grandmother. empty nest syndrome so will adopt just about everyone. witch. ✧ ivonne de los ángeles ugalde. she/her. bisexual. marjorie’s mother. hasn’t spoken to her mother in a few years now. thrift store owner. witch. ✧ andrés cruz novillo. he/him. demisexual. marjorie’s father. was taken in by dulce maría similar to archie. “my wife is a bitch and i like her so much”. witch. ✧ xander cruz duarte. he/they. asexual. marjorie’s favourite cousin. half-witch with an acute psychic awareness (to the point of it being worrisome).

aesthetic: spells in your kitchen, animal bones spread on your bed, 2am and watching movies with a new bowl of popcorn, wearing pyjamas all day, a chill in the air that never leaves, digging up graves, steps that follow you in the forest, that contagious baby laugh, skinny love, a mismatched outfit that somehow works, your reflection in an empty studio as you dance, prayers in spanish, crying on your best friend’s shoulder without being judged, saying “i love you” platonically, a family you build yourself, big wreaths of wildflowers, lampposts in the blue hour, pastel skies, a quiet neighbourhood street, butterflies crowding around a dead body, garbage bags that glow from the inside

playlist: boreas / the oh hellos ; c’mon / panic! at the disco ft. fun ; master pretender / first aid kit ; wolf / siames ; the bones / maren morris ft. hozier ; emergency / nothing but thieves ; witches / daughter ; which witch / florence + the machine ; beautiful creatures / illenium ; eat you alive / the oh hellos ; bottom of the river / delta rae ; o death / kate mann ; exodus / ruelle ; permanence / bears in trees ; hide & seek / amber run ; i talk in my sleep / the crane wives ; you / keaton henson ; fast car / tracy chapman ; meet me in the woods / lord huron ; rose / the oh hellos ; in the woods somewhere / hozier

[fuckyeahjamieandclaire]

There are great reasons to watch Starz’s period romance drama “Outlander,” starting with the sex and sometimes ending with the sex. But for now, I’d like to praise what happens between the show’s main characters when they are clothed.

Okay, that’s only a small lie. Even the most serious-minded “Outlander” fan is at least partly tuned in/turned on every Sunday night in hopes of seeing more of the enthusiastic lovemaking (glowingly demonstrated by stars Caitriona Balfe and Sam Heughan) that propels this epic. It’s difficult to think of another cable series that wields its adult content — and the chemistry between its co-stars — so maturely.

Anyway, this is meant to be a piece about how “Outlander,” now in the middle of a satisfyingly strong fourth season, is the only show around in which a man and a woman — an 18th-century Scottish Highlander named Jamie Fraser (Heughan) and his time-traveling wife, a 20th-century English doctor named Claire Randall Fraser (Balfe, who just got a Golden Globe nomination for her work on the show) — have found a way to truly communicate. What more could we need from a TV series in 2018 than to see two adults persist against all odds by listening to one another?

For the record, other discerning viewers find plenty to dislike about “Outlander,” particularly around its handling of sexual violence — or the constant, close-call threats of it. For such a dumb-looking show, “Outlander” manages to start a lot of conversations and arguments.

Yet the show’s heart, I’ve found, is almost always in the right place. Despite a rocky and even abusive start to their relationship, Jamie and Claire found the kind of love that benefits from talking, from sharing information as well as their deepest feelings. It’s the one show where two people will actually stop in the middle of the action to check in, emotionally, and bring one another up to speed.

Not that they get a lot of time for that. Each week Claire and Jamie endure every possible calamity that can befall a white, heterosexual, married couple in the 1770s — at least one life-threatening crisis per episode. Together and separately they have so far survived the culture-shock of time travel along with war, torture, imprisonment, attempted sexual assaults, a rape (in a provocative twist, Jamie was the rape victim, not Claire), parenthood, separation, ocean crossings, palace intrigue, disease, grave injury, pirates, bandits, robbers, smugglers, witches, a hurricane and a shipwreck. 

In Season 4, Jamie and Claire establish a small settlement in the mountains of North Carolina, just before the American Revolution. In addition to dealing once more with sneering redcoats and the stirrings of anti-British rebellion, there are other, uniquely American problems to face: angry mobs of aggrieved slave-owners out for a lynching; tentative relations with the Cherokee tribe across the creek; and a neighboring houseful of Lutherans with a deadly case of the measles. The list goes on — sometimes laughably so.

“Outlander’s” best moments are found in those smaller, more insular moments in which Jamie and Claire see the world through one another’s perspectives. TV is full of couples who misconstrue, raise volumes, ignore key issues, assign blame, gossip to outside confidants about spousal shortcomings, disappoint in the bedroom and storm out of the house a lot. The technical term for that is conflict and most writers of relationship stories would be lost without it.

Which is why, the more you watch “Outlander,” the more you see just how intentionally it veers from prestige TV’s frustrating parade of toxic, temperamental couplings — everything from “You’re the Worst” to “The Affair” to “Camping.” Jamie and Claire deal with all sorts of external melodramatic dangers, but together they might as well be gorgeous unicorns. They don’t bicker. They don’t interrupt one another. He doesn’t ramble on about battlefield heroics; she doesn’t start in with monologues about electricity and indoor plumbing.

Their presence within a shared present asks the viewer: When was the last time anyone really heard what you were saying?

"Outlander" is faithfully based on Diana Gabaldon's best-selling novels, an appealingly cerebral commingling of the romance, fantasy and historical fiction genres, with just a touch of sci-fi thrown in and a refreshingly modern take on relationships that rejects the usual Mars/Venus dynamic. r

It’s not surprising that women make up most of the show’s fan base (even though the occasional “Outmander” finds his way in, and the series was developed by a male showrunner, Ronald D. Moore). I’ve seen groups of “Outlander” fans waiting outside news conferences for the show in Los Angeles, sitting quietly but excitedly in the lobby, hoping to catch a glimpse of the cast members or Gabaldon herself. It’s almost as if they are on security detail, making sure nobody mucks up their treasured characters and stories, which is perfectly understandable. Such devotion helped “Outlander” sustain relatively high ratings among cable dramas, with about 1.5 million viewers watching new episodes within the week.

Even with all its twists and turns and screen-steaming love scenes, “Outlander” continues to feel like a worthwhile progression. Jamie’s rebellious streak may tempt him to commit occasional (necessary) crimes, but his devotion to Claire has helped him evolve into a thoughtful gentleman of the Enlightenment.

And Claire is wise about what she tells Jamie about the future. As they take in a jaw-dropping western vista from a Carolina mountaintop, she speaks generally of just how far this new country will push forward — and the immigrant dreamers who will populate it. She helps him see the injustice of the slave trade that thrives all around them. She conveys the long (and correct) view of Native American rights. She asserts her own rights as a spouse and a professional; Jamie is quick to introduce his wife to strangers as an accomplished “healer.”

It’s easy to locate a feminist theme here, as many viewers already have: Jamie is a changed man because he met a smart, open-minded woman from the future who has challenged everything he once knew.

How could he not be improved by the experience — this giant, scarred slab of man-candy in a kilt, who once believed he owned Claire simply because he married her? And how can we not see the show as a lesson in brute reform?

Aye, but here’s the real beauty of “Outlander”: The exchange is mutual. She’s as much changed by him as he is by her. His masculinity is as instructive as her femininity. His wisdom complements hers. Even when their candlelit sex scenes are the main draw, the body parts that are most impressive are their ears.

Ask anyone who has traveled enough time with a significant other: Being heard as an equal partner is just as great — and sometimes better — than another roll in the hay.

[eat-yourheart]

@6robotmonster6 Randall posing with some “momentos” :3c 

 IGNORE THE SHIT PHOTO QUALITY PLS LMAOOO

[darkside-cookies]

Put your whole song library on shuffle and write down the first 10 songs, then tag 10 blogs

με έκαναν tag οι: @marmadelin, @den-xerw-giati-uparxw, @waywardshadowhunter, @justwellarrangeddust, @mne-bolno και @kardia-apo-marmelada (ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΩ ΠΑΙΔΙΑ ΤΟΣΟ ΠΟΛΥ)

Hozier // Movement

Heavy Young Heathens // Being Evil Has A Price 

ATEEZ // Say My Name ( @adastreia-12 αφιερωμένο)

The Pretty Reckless // Heaven Knows 

One Republic // Rescue Me

CAZZETTE // She Wants Me Dead 

8 Graves // Bury Me Low 

grandson // Bury Me Face Down 

Bastille // Campus 

The Neighbourhood // Wires 

Και κάνω tag: καταρχάς κάτω tag πίσω εσάς που με ταγκάρατε (αν θέλετε να το κάνετε ξανά - απλώς αυτό είναι ένα από εκείνα τα tag που μας αρέσει να τα κάνουμε ξανά και ξανά) και @4419startline, @raqhaelia, @adastreia-12, @gleek-runner, @lovely-dreamer, @pagokolwna, @youre-a-cosmic-child, @unicorn-of-satan, @blodbranddod, @hawaiiandragon, @hong-thong, @companionofthemoon, @elpizw-se-ena-kalo-telos, @senoul, @0neiroparmenh, @lilhex, @unrealistic-android, @cutestarlightlady, @anonymous-crazy-girl, @still-christine, @die-ritterin, @3-1415926535s, @epistrofh-twn-ypogeiwn-poihtwn, @apoklinousaa, @callmemar99, @under-self-restorationn, @interritus-lupus, @wot-gr, @hwrrypottah, @when-n, @thelaziestskybreaker, @fourseascns, @lithuanianblood, @randall-flvggs, @colourful--dreamer, @the-bird-mom-art, @psychedelicmessworld, @six-feet-underneath, @claire--r, @daughtersofkadmos, @eighteen-million-trashcans

[bountyofbeads]

DeVos Aides Pulled Strings for Failing For-Profit Colleges, Emails Show https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/us/politics/dream-center.html

⚠️Trump Swamp Corruption Alert ⚠

Emails Show DeVos Aides Pulled Strings for Failing For-Profit Colleges

By Erica L. Green and Stacy Cowley |

Published July 23, 2019 | New York Times | Posted July 23, 2019 |

WASHINGTON — Dream Center Education Holdings, a subsidiary of a Los Angeles-based megachurch, had no experience in higher education when it petitioned the federal Education Department to let it take over a troubled chain of for-profit trade schools.

But the organization’s chairman, Randall K. Barton, told the education secretary, Betsy DeVos, that the foundation wanted to “help people live better lives.”

The purchase was blessed despite Dream Center’s lack of experience and questionable finances by an administration favorable to for-profit education. But barely a year later, the company tumbled into insolvency, dozens of its colleges closed abruptly and thousands of students were left with no degree after paying tens of thousands of dollars in tuition.

Making matters worse, the college is accused of enrolling new students and taking their taxpayer-supported financial aid dollars even after some of its campuses had lost their accreditation, which rendered their credits worthless.

Company emails, documents and recordings show that part of why Dream Center kept going is that it thought the Education Department, which under Ms. DeVos has rolled back regulations on for-profit education, would try to keep it from failing. Mr. Barton emailed other Dream Center executives that the department’s head of higher education policy — Diane Auer Jones, a former executive and lobbyist for for-profit colleges — had pulled strings to help the company’s schools in their effort to regain a seal of approval from an accreditor, despite their perilous positions.

In another instance, Dream Center’s chief operating officer told faculty at an endangered campus that Ms. Jones was changing departmental regulations to help the schools obtain accreditation retroactively.

Although the Trump administration did eventually cut off federal aid to the chain of colleges and precipitate their collapse, Democrats say the department failed to respond to warning signs.

Representative Robert C. Scott, a Virginia Democrat who is the chairman of the House Education Committee, unveiled a trove of documents, including internal communication between executives from Dream Center, in a letter to Ms. DeVos this month. He said the documents suggest that Ms. Jones misled Congress about her efforts to help shield Dream Center from its misdeeds.

“The actions of Dream Center and the Department of Education’s execution of its responsibility to protect students raises grave concerns,” Mr. Scott wrote.

Instead of requiring Dream Center to take action, “the department informed Dream Center executives that it would work to retroactively accredit the institutions during the periods they had lied to students — rewriting history to erase Dream Center’s deceptive marketing practices,” Mr. Scott wrote.

The Education Department has maintained it did nothing wrong.

“This story is based entirely on a wrongful premise,” the department wrote in a statement. “The full and complete timeline shows Dream Center did not receive any unique benefits from policy decisions made by the department. We simply worked to try and get as many students into a new program as possible. While we did not achieve a perfect outcome, our actions helped thousands of students land on their feet.”

In a response letter to Mr. Scott on Monday, the department’s acting general counsel, Reed D. Rubinstein, submitted documentation that he said contradicted the committee’s “unfair suggestions” that the department tailored its policies to assist Dream Center and were not forthcoming with Congress. “The Department categorically rejects these allegations,” he wrote.

“Dream Center’s management received no special treatment,” he said.

President Trump has moved to deregulate any number of industries, from mining and offshore oil exploration to chemicals and internet providers. But Ms. DeVos’s efforts to get the government off the backs of for-profit colleges have come under particular scrutiny, in part because of the spectacular implosions of for-profit college chains only a few years ago, in part because people who once worked in the sector have led the DeVos deregulatory push.

Dream Center’s collapse was the first of the new deregulatory era. Yet Education Department officials insisted, repeatedly, that its demise had nothing to do with the administration’s policies or efforts. Ms. Jones told Congress that she did not even know of Dream Center’s accreditation problems at the time the company said she was working to get it out of its jam. She also told lawmakers the policy change extending retroactive accreditation had “nothing to do with the Dream Center.”

Those assurances are now being questioned.

“The documents further suggest that department officials were not forthcoming to Congress and the public about the information they had about Dream Center’s status and practices,” Mr. Scott wrote. He is requesting emails, text messages and interviews with several department officials, including Ms. Jones.

The letter and documents “raise questions about whether the department took steps to allow Dream Center to mislead students,” Mr. Scott said.

[Read the documents.]

From the start, the Education Department overlooked red flags when, in late 2017, Dream Center took control of more than 100 campuses with 50,000 students from a for-profit higher education company, Education Management Corporation. Around that time, Dream Center’s accreditor, the Higher Learning Commission, notified the organization that it was about to change two of its schools’ accreditation status. Two Education Department officials, including the agency’s director of accreditation, were copied on the letter.

In January 2018, the accreditor published a notification on its website stating that the two Dream Center schools were not accredited by the Higher Learning Commission. It ordered Dream Center to tell students that their courses and degrees “may not be accepted in transfer to other colleges and universities or recognized by prospective employers.”

Yet for five months, Dream Center kept advertising, “We remain accredited.”

By July 2018, Dream Center was running out of cash and knew its accreditation problems could worsen its financial strain. Emails from that month obtained by the House Education Committee indicate that Dream Center officials believed that the Education Department was maneuvering to help it stave off catastrophe.

In written responses to questions from Congress, the Education Department said Ms. Jones was first made aware that the two Dream Center institutions were not accredited on July 10, 2018. She was unaware of the public notice that the Higher Learning Commission had issued nearly six months earlier, according to the agency. She was notified a week later that the institutions were misrepresenting their accreditation status and ordered them the next day to stop, the department said.

Ms. Jones was asked during a House Oversight Committee hearing this spring whether a policy she had issued later that month that allowed accreditations to be granted retroactively was aimed at helping Dream Center. “Absolutely not. It had nothing to do with the Dream Center,” she answered.

But in company emails, Dream Center executives indicated the Education Department tipped them off on July 3, 2018, that a new retroactive accreditation policy was coming, a week before Ms. Jones said she even knew Dream Center had a problem.

“We just got off the phone with DOE,” Mr. Barton wrote. “It appears HLC is in sync with retro” accreditation.

 An email dated July 3, 2018, discusses the Department of Education’s upcoming retroactive accreditation policy. Diane Auer Jones, who is referenced in the email, had claimed she did not know that Dream Center schools were not accredited until a week later.

He said Ms. Jones — whom he directly cited by name — had worked with accreditors, and “they will all agree to one plan with department blessing.”

Mr. Barton did not respond to requests for comment on his emails.

On July 11, Dream Center’s chief operating officer told faculty in a meeting on an Illinois campus that the department would allow the schools’ accreditor to grant retroactive accreditation. He said department officials “changed their regulation to open the door to letting it happen,”  according to a recording of the meeting obtained by the committee. He referred to a conversation with Ms. Jones the week prior where “she said everybody was going to be accommodating.”

Weeks later, on July 25, Ms. Jones finalized the plan allowing retroactive accreditation, which was a major win for Dream Center. While the schools were already slated for closure, retroactive accreditation would have shielded the company from legal action for making misleading statements about its accreditation status.

Ms. Jones said she had begun to revise that guidance months earlier to allay longstanding concerns about the department’s policy stemming from a dispute involving an accreditor of a nursing program. The retroactive policy would have also allowed students to more easily transfer their credits if they were earned at an accredited institution.

In response to Mr. Scott’s accusations, Ms. Jones said, in a written statement to The Times, “The retroactive accreditation policy — which had been under discussion long before I arrived at the department — decided not whether Dream Center would live or die, but whether or not students could transfer their credits for the hard work they had completed.”

In August, after it became public that the two schools would close, Dream Center’s head of regulatory and government affairs wrote an email to other Dream Center officials reminding them that communication should be kept confidential because “Diane is really working behind the scenes to help guide us and keep the accreditors aligned.”

 Dream Center’s head of regulatory and government affairs wrote an email to her colleagues reminding them that communication about accreditation should be kept confidential.

Ms. Jones did not directly address the July 3 and July 11 communication from Dream Center officials, but acknowledged that she had worked with accreditors. She called the Dream Center accreditation issue a “messy and complex situation” and said the accreditor had sent mixed messages about the status of Dream Center’s schools.

Ms. Jones had acknowledged to Congress that she had concerns about the organization’s capacity to manage its closures, and was in regular communication with a group of accreditors to devise a plan to allow Dream Center students to complete their degrees, known as a “teach-out,” after their campuses closed.

“My goal was to get as many of the more than 8,000 students to new institutions where they could complete their programs,” she said. “I stand firm in my decision to work collaboratively with accreditors to hold Dream Center accountable. That Dream Center executives characterize this as being about them is disingenuous but not surprising. They were trying to make it appear they had control of the mess they had made.”

A group of students, represented by the National Student Legal Defense Network, filed a lawsuit last year, saying Dream Center issued “false and misleading” statements about its accreditation status, which broke state laws and caused “substantial harm” to more than 1,000 students.

Mr. Scott also pointed to emails documenting the steps the Education Department took to help Dream Center get hold of some much-needed cash to prop up its failing campuses.

In an October 2018 email, Dream Center officials were preparing to request funding from an escrow account managed by the department.

The funds were intended to offset taxpayer liabilities if some of the chain’s schools closed or failed. Dream Center wanted to use part of the money to pay for expenses associated with closing campuses and helping current students complete their degrees. The department had in August agreed to release up to $50 million; Dream Center wanted more.

Dennis Cariello, a Dream Center lawyer, sent an email to company executives before a meeting with A. Wayne Johnson, who headed the department’s office of financial aid. At the meeting, Mr. Cariello planned to deliver a “list of the asks” that amounted to $75 million.

 An email from a Dream Center attorney discusses a list of expenses they planned to bring up at a meeting with a Department of Education official.

Mr. Cariello communicated that Mr. Johnson “asked that I review the draw requests — there are a few we can’t have in there — bonuses and future rental payments were issues for him.”

Mr. Cariello declined to comment on the exchange. The department had released a total of $40 million from the escrow account to Dream Center by the end of last year, according to records it sent in response to questions from Congress.

Education Department officials have maintained that they worked tirelessly to mitigate the fallout of the Dream Center collapse. The department restricted the schools’ cash flow from federal student loans after Dream Center went into receivership in January, barely a month before it cut off federal student loan funds to Argosy University. That final move was considered the death knell for the company.

But until then, Dream Center executives had reason to believe they had friends at the Education Department. In January 2018, just as Dream Center’s schools lost their accreditation, Ronald L. Holt, a regulatory lawyer on the Dream Center team, sent a presentation to Dream Center executives on the state of higher education a year into the Trump administration.

It included a song he wrote titled, “You’ve Got a Friend in Trump,” to the tune of Randy Newman’s “You’ve Got a Friend in Me,” used in the movie “Toy Story.”

We’ve got a friend in Trump

He’s lifting us out of our slump

We were down — and life was rough

Too many regs, were way too tough

After so many years

We’d just had enough, but

Now, we’ve got a friend in Trump.

[sunnydaleherald]

The Sunnydale Herald Newsletter, Friday, October 19

[Drabbles & Short Fiction]

A Different Kind of Trouble (Faith/Dawn, PG-13) by katleept

If Ever a Wiz There Was (Giles, Labyrinth xover, R) by CantSpeakFae

[Chaptered Fiction]

To See the Light Chapter 20 (Buffy, Xander, Bleach xover, G) by madimpossibledreamer

Our Time Chapter 1 (Giles/Ethan, R) by rippergiles

Almost Home Chapter 1 (Buffy/Spike, R) by Slaymesoftly

Forward Without Seeing Chapter 121 (Ensemble, R) by queen_insane

The Tribe of the Cave Slayer Chapter 2 (OCs, PG-13) by steeleye

The Darkling Chapter 21 (Buffy/Spike, NC-17) by OffYourBird

The Academy, Charleston Chapter 6 (Buffy/Faith, R) by Bremsstrahlung

Grave Chapter 23 (Buffy/Spike, R) by justsue

Eye of Eleos Chapter 5 (Buffy/Spike, R) by pfeifferpack

[Images, Audio & Video]

Artwork: Buffy sketch by thedragonconsumes

Artwork: Buffy drawing by wait-for-october

Artwork: Buffy drawing by lighane

Artwork: Buffy sketch by solsethegreat

Icons: 20+ Btvs Icons by stnia

Fanvid: don’t give me up (Angel/Buffy) by vellichor.

Artwork: Buffy drawing by USERNAME

Artork: Willow sketch by trilliumjente

Artwork: Dawn and Spike drawing by trilliumjente

[Reviews & Recaps]

Giles Reviewed: Issue 1 by harsens-rob

TV Fanatic: Buffy the Vampire Slayer Rewatch: Consequences

[Fandom Discussions]

just finished my btvs season 2 rewatch... by buffydreadful

It’s bullshit and a lie to call BtVS a feminist show by we-pay-for-everything

What's your inspiration for fleshing out Randall and the rest of the gang? answered by cantspeakfae

I’ve never really understood is the notion that the themes in Season 6 are somehow more “adult” than other seasons by sulietsexual

Xander analysis by dingoes8myrp

Bangel vs. Halloween by nevergonnabemuchmorethanweather

[mrbluebeard666]

🔞MINORS DNI🔞

Name's Randall R. Graves, ya'll can call me Randy for short. Just tryin' out this whole online thing. Keep me entertained n' I'll keep ya' as happy as a dead pig in sunshine! ♡

⚠️This blog will contain blood, violent images, strong language, etc. viewer discretion is advised ⚠️ MINORS DNI - you will be blocked! 🔞 AGELESS BLOGS INCLUDED

[jmunneytumbler]

'Clerks III': The Middle-Aged, Post-Heart Attack Version

That’s so Clerks … III (CREDIT: Lionsgate) Starring: Brian O’Halloran, Jeff Anderson, Trevor Fehrman, Austin Zajur, Jason Mewes, Kevin Smith, Rosario Dawson, Amy Sedaris Director: Kevin Smith Running Time: 100 Minutes Rating: R for Casual Potty Mouths Release Date: September 13, 2022 (In Theaters September 13-18) What’s It About?: Are Dante Hicks and Randal Graves stuck in purgatory? Or maybe…

[crazygirlsworldofbooks]

Review: The Good Lie

“William S. Burroughs once said that no one owns life, but anyone who can lift a frying pan can create death. He was right. Killing is the easy part. The act of living—of finding happiness in life—that’s the hard part.”

Book: The Good Lie

Author: A. R. Torre

My Rating: ✯✯✯✯✯ (5 Stars)

Read: February 23, 2022

Synopsis: 

Six teens murdered. A suspect behind bars. A desperate father. In a case this shadowy, the truth is easy to hide. Six teenagers dead. Finally, the killer behind bars. But are the games just beginning? Psychiatrist Dr. Gwen Moore is an expert on killers. She’s spent a decade treating California’s most depraved predators and unlocking their motives—predators much like the notorious Bloody Heart serial killer, whose latest teenage victim escaped and then identified local high school teacher Randall Thompson as his captor. The case against Thompson as the Bloody Heart Killer is damning—and closed, as far as Gwen and the media are concerned. If not for one new development… Defense attorney Robert Kavin is a still-traumatized father whose own son fell prey to the BH Killer. Convinced of Thompson’s innocence, he steps in to represent him. Now Robert wants Gwen to interview the accused, create a psych profile of the killer and his victims, and help clear his client’s name. As Gwen and Robert grow closer and she dives deeper into the investigation, grave questions arise. So does Gwen’s suspicion that Robert is hiding something—and that he might not be the only one with a secret.

My Review:

This book is on the smaller side but it packs quite a punch! I picked it up initially because I was looking for a smaller book to read and it happened to blow me away completely! There is nothing about this book that I don't love- from the twisty plot to the very dark and morally gray characters, I just couldn’t get enough of this book and this story. I would have gladly read another hundred pages of it because I couldn’t get enough.

To begin with, The Good Lie is about a psychiatrist who treats killers. When she suspects that one of her clients has committed a crime that she should have seen coming, she gets entwined with a defense attorney who hires her to write a profile of the most notorious serial killer- the Bloody Heart Killer, who also happened to have killed his own son. I honestly loved this plot and ate it right up! I haven't read a thriller with such a creative plot in a very long time and this book surpassed all of my expectations and desires that I have ever looked for or wanted in a thriller. It was pretty fast paced and I didn't find that I was bored at all, each chapter gave us a little nugget of information that was important and it really drove me to hurry up and finish the book, which has been a struggle for me lately with books. I guess you can say I’ve been in a bit of a reading slump or maybe it’s just life. Either way, this book was fantastic.

Further on, the characterization is brilliant, that’s the only way I can think of to describe the depth and flaws of these very morally gray characters. I was able to relate to all of them, even the very worst ones, because of the simple fact that they were human and flawed humanity was forever a part of them, no matter how much they might want to deny that. They have all made many mistakes in their lives but they were still living and trying to do what they could to help repent or find some kind of peace, so that they could actually learn to live with those mistakes. I can’t wait to read this authors other books, I am actually starting a buddy read by this author right after I finish up this review. That’s how amazing this book really was! I just can’t get enough!

Finally, the writing style was top notch, at least as far as thrillers go. It wasn’t too wordy or descriptive and yet it illustrated what was going on beautifully. It was also precise but not too overly simplified and was intelligently able to get to the point pretty quickly. The book wasn’t big but the writing was on the smaller side and even with that, I was still able to get through the book relatively quickly, especially for me. 

In conclusion, I absolutely loved this book and it’s the first five star thriller that I have read so far this year. I would recommend it to anyone who likes twisty and fast-paced thrillers with morally gray characters, whom you can’t help but root for. I am obsessed with this book and can’t wait to pick up The Girl in 6E next!

[today-in-wwi]

Italians Retreat from the Isonzo

Some of the more than 250,000 Italian PoWs captured in late October and early November.

October 27 1917, Udine--By early on October 27, the Germans and Austrians had completely broken through around Caporetto.  The fall of Gran Monte, to the west of the town, along with Rommel’s capture of Mt. Matajur just to the southwest, meant that the way was now open to the plains and the Adriatic below.  The Italian forces on the lower Isonzo, which had fought for the last two years to secure a few miles on the far side of the river, now risked being trapped.  At 2:30 AM, Cadorna ordered a general retreat back to the Tagliamento, thirty miles to the west.  Many soldiers of the Third Army openly wept as they abandoned their hard-fought gains and the graves of hundreds of thousands of fellow soldiers.

Meanwhile, the Second Army was in full retreat from the advancing Germans and Austrians.  Most of its troops, those who did not face the initial attack, were still in good order. However, they were largely abandoned by their commanders. The Second Army’s commander had been taken ill only a few days before the attack, while Cadorna put the blame squarely on his soldiers, telling a subordinate, “What could I do? The army was swarming with worms.”  His official response to Rome, sent the next day, was little better: “the failure to resist on the part of units of the Second Army, which cravenly withdrew without fighting or ignominiously surrendered to the enemy, has allowed the Austro-German forces to break through...”  Cadorna himself left his headquarters in Udine for Treviso, over 60 miles to the west, safely behind the Piave, while leaving the Second Army to retreat over the few bridges over the upper Tagliamento (reserving the others for the Third Army).

The soldiers of the Second Army rightly felt abandoned.  One soldier recalled that on hearing that the generals had left:

“Then we’re going too,” someone said, and we all shouted “That’s right, we have had enough of the war, we’re going home.”  The lieutenant said, “You’ve gone mad, I’ll shoot you,” but we took his pistol away. We threw our rifles away and started marching to the rear.  Soldiers were pouring along the other paths and we told them all we were going home and they should come with us and throw their guns away.  I was worried at first, but then I thought I had nothing to lose, I’d have been killed if I’d stayed in the trenches and anything was better than that.  And then I felt so angry because I’d put up with everything like a slave till now; I’d never even thought of getting away. But I was happy too, we were all happy, all saying “it’s home or prison, but no more war.”

Cadorna, having lost faith in his own soldiers, and recognizing that he desperately needed help, accepted an offer from Foch for four French divisions to bolster the Italians.  Lloyd George, long a proponent of British aid to the Italian front, also ordered two divisions there, though he knew they would not be used for an offensive there as he had hoped.

Today in 1916: Australian Ministers Resign Over Conscription Today in 1915: Bulgarian and Austro-Hungarian Forces Meet in Serbia Today in 1914: HMS Audacious Sunk by German Mine In View of RMS Olympic

Sources include: Mark Thompson, The White War; Randal Gray, Chronicle of the First World War; John R. Schindler, Isonzo.

[bdscuatui]

Các giao dịch bất động sản ở Massachusetts cho các hạt Hampden, Hampshire và Franklin: ngày 26 tháng 1 năm 2020 #thôngtin AgawamAndrew J. Fox đến Daniel O hèConnor, 51-53 Hope Farms Dr., $ 295.000.Daniel Fruwirth và Deanna Fruwirth đến Hamid Satraouy, 28 Melrose Place, 238.500 đô la.Thomas F. Reidy II và Sherry M. Reidy đến Pine Crossing Development Inc., 466 South Westfield St., $ 866,562.Tina M. Chandler đến Christian T. Ledoux, 11 Mansion Woods Dr., Đơn vị 11-C, $ 187.000.AmherstJeanne L. Balcom đến Jeanne L. Balcom, ủy thác và Autumn Lane Trust, 2 Autumn Lane, $ 100.Jean M. LaPlante đến Goldfinch Holdings LLC, 191-193 Middle St., $ 275,000.Amherst Real Properties LLC, đến Glenn Warren và Christine Warren, Leverett Road, 130.000 đô la.Robert T. Zoeller và Mary Mitchell Zoeller đến Elizabeth L. Hallstrom và Theodore A. Hallstrom, 63 Cherry Lane, $ 425.000.Sonja Guddat và Sonja Kadziolka đến Roshna Shahi và Ranju Shahi, 156 Columbia Drive, 420.000 USD.Ronald Fontanetta cho Tom Svrcek và Catherine J. Svrcek, 1133 North Pleasant St., 369.500 đô la.Sân vận độngBrown Trust, John R. Evans II, Ủy thác cho Peter D. Corens, Beldingville Road, 300.000 đô la.Maplecrest Trust, John R. Evans II, ủy thác, đến Janet L. Casteld, Beldingville Road, 400.000 đô la.Timberwood Trust, John R. Evans II, ủy thác, đến Peter D. Corens, Beldingville Road, 400.000 đô la.Cape Trust, John R. Evans II, ủy thác, đến Janet L. Casteld, 876 Beldingville Road. 700.000 đô la.BelchertownEdwin Diaz và Vivian I. Santiago-Diaz đến Dhana Bhattrai và Rajan Bhattrai, 20 đường Hill Hill, $ 315.000.Peter Barnett Dupret cho Eric D. Aasheim và Sarah D. Aasheim, 121 Barton Ave., $ 320.000.Georgette P. Defriesse, Georgette P. Defriesse, đại diện cá nhân và Madeline J. Casey, bất động sản, đến Jonathan Grossman, 61 Chadbourne Road, 166.500 đô la.Joel Harder với Raymond Jean Paul Robbins và Diane Marie Robbins, 140 Old Enfield Road, 395.000 đô la.Freedom Mortthing Corp, đến Robert Jay Mitchell, 216 Bay Road, $ 125.999.Robert Jay Mitchell đến Heritage Ventures LLC, 216 Bay Road, 100 đô la.M & G Land Development LLC, đến Joshua R. Wallace và Suzi A. Wallace, 510 Franklin St., $ 381,035.Kinda S. Binder cho Jennifer L. Albury và Antonio Marquez-Diaz, 281 Mill Valley Road, 270.000 đô la.Cánh đồngJason Bedard và Chevelle Bedard đến Beth A. Goven, 34 Lyman Barnes Road, $ 278.000.Pawel Kruszewski đến Erika Flores, 10 đường Echo, 27.000 USD.Roger A. Parker và Tracy L. Parker đến Jason M. Bedard và Chevelle Bedard, 19 Lyman Barnes Road, 400.000 USD.ChicopeeAlex B. Devivo và Gabrielle Devivo đến Dee Ann Civello, 143 Sesame Dr., $ 330.000.Christina M. Moreau, Stacy L. Moreau và Gerhard Teply đến 21 Dale LLC, 21 Dale St., $ 245.000.Craig Cwalina đến Luis A. Ortiz Diaz, 47 Lester St., $ 259,400.Trưởng khoa F. Desmarais và Maria C. Desmarais đến Douglas William Dolbow và Robin Marie Dolbow, 211 School House Road, 280.000 USD.Edward R. Paul và Margaret A. Paul đến Karen McCollaum, 4 địa điểm Pembroke, $ 170.000.Lana J. Guz đến Desiree A. Frank, 47 Whittlesey Ave., 100.000 đô la.Matthew M. Balut và Tiffany Balut cho Sarah E. Mueller và Brian E. Adams, 597 Broadway St., $ 190.000.Namik Mamedov đến Sergeo V. Arbuzov, 36-38 Fuller St., $ 259,900.Peggy Breault, Peggy A. Breault, Paul Allard và Paul M. Allard cho Robert Schlefstein và Tina Marie Bergeron, 663 Pendleton Ave., $ 185.000.Sylvia Fairbanks, đại diện, Richard Godek, bất động sản, và Richard Andrew Godek, bất động sản, đến Marisol Mateo, 11 Riverdale Road, $ 174.000.Thomas E. McCollaum và Karen McCollaum đến Vòng Hai LLC, 59 Artisan St., 75.000 đô la.Thomas McCollaum và Karen McCollaum đến Cesar Lopez, 27-29 Charbonneau Terrace, 110.000 USD.Đông thànhPeter Y. Hoag và Eugenia M. Hoag cho David Rosenthal và Beverly Rosenthal, 44 Ashley Circle, 469.000 đô la.Jordan P. Healy đến Jordan P. Healy và Jennifer Erickson, 218 East St., $ 100.David Raucher, Donald Raucher, Douglas Raucher, Dennis Raucher và Diane Miller Raucher đến Wagging Tails Animal Services LLC, 30 Florence Road, 750.000 USD.Cynthia M. Lukowski đến Heidi Chereski, 34 Đại lộ Tây Nguyên, $ 233,900.Leonard Larock và Corrine Larock cho Patsy Lawnhust MacKinnon và Gregory Neil MacKinnon, 19-21 West St., 425.000 đô la.GranbyEdward C. Shyloski & Sons Inc., đến Kotowicz Custom Homes LLC, Carver Street, 65.000 đô la.Tyson R. Ence đến Britney Archambault Jackson, 115 South St., $ 235.000.GranvilleHội tiết kiệm quỹ Wilmington, Christiana Trust, ủy thác và BCAT 2015-14BTT, ủy thác của, cho Robert Joseph Toth, 49 đường Hartland Hollow, 34.500 đô la.Cánh đồng xanhJohn V. Bellenoit cho Kurt William Schellenberg và Bekkaoc EllerEowind, 73 phố Maple, $ 222.000.Gary M. Bohonowicz và Doreen M. Tilley cho Christopher Charmack, 18 Green St./Green Street, $ 287.000.Cassidy Buchanan-Gauthier và Kayla R. Gundrum đến Jenifer L. Gelieneau và William L. Gussin, 12 Mountain Road, 220.000 USD.Wedgewood Gardens Inc., đến Taryn B. Valdez, 220 Silver St., $ 222.000.HadleyDonna M. Carver, ủy thác và Donna M. Carver Tin tưởng có thể hủy bỏ đối với Farah Chamoun và Fibi Kahabout, 131 Rocky Hill Road, 430.000 đô la.Nhà phân phối lợp kim loại của Hoa Kỳ Inc., đến Alan St.Hilaire và Christina Carrera-St. Hilaire, 103 North Maple St., $ 125.000.Hà LanMark N. Bierman và Jacqueline J. Bierman đến Classic Solutions Inc., 6 Wood Lane, 35.000 USD.HolyokeAnthony W. Soto và Melissa M. Soto đến Tyler William Tardy, 324 Elm St., $ 180.000.Daniel Chandler đến Coakley Corp, 60 Lower Westfield Road, $ 117.000.Giám mục Công giáo La Mã của Springfield đến Foley Property Management Corp, 1985 Northampton St., $ 875.000.Laura A. Renaud, đại diện, Roger H. Renaud, bất động sản, và Roger Henry Renaud, bất động sản, đến Brendan M. Cauley, 12 Arbor Way, Đơn vị A, 77.000 đô la.Holyoke Community Land Trust Inc. đến Diana Garcia, 140 Essex St., 4.000 USD.LongmeadowFrank N. Leichthammer và Laurie A. Leichthammer đến Đại học Bay Path, 577 Longmeadow St., $ 309.000.Raymond G. Rowe và Debra H. Rowe đến Patrick Curry, 35 đường Barrington, $ 182,000.Robert H. Marshall đến Linda A. Hickling và Angel L. Garcia, 76 Longmeadow St., $ 232.000.LudlowTạo bọt ngôi nhà LLC đến Taylor Lukas và David Normand II, 49 W. Belmont St., $ 229.000.Henry J. Kelly và Phyllis D. Kelly đến John Portelada Jr., 42 Hampshire St., 121.000 đô la.Raymond Jean Paul Robbins và Diane Marie Robbins đến Yongqiang Wang, 17 Windwood Dr., 375.000 đô la.Tuukakorp LLC đến Stephanie P. Nascimento, Parker Lane, $ 135.000.Đức ôngPamela A. Bourgault đến Ashley C. Gendron và Ashley Fussell, 17 Elm St., $ 157.500.MontagueGillian B. Wilson đến Casey J. Placek và Kevin Randall, 15 Norman Circle, 135.000 đô la.Cody-Joy Tringali cho Justin D. Killeen, 342 Liên bang St., 175.000 đô la.MontgomeryCIG4 LLC đến Tyler Montgomery và Anthony Fastiggi, 6 đường Pine Ridge, $ 185.000.Giáo dụcV Mortidor Reo 2 LLC, Newrez LLC, luật sư thực tế, New Penn Financial LLC, luật sư thực tế và Dịch vụ thế chấp Shellpoint, luật sư, thực tế, cho Kinda A. Kamins, 12 Maple St., 175.000 đô la.Janvier Rollande và Janvier L. Rollande đến Kristine Mak Yu, 48 Graves Ave., 336.500 đô la.Frank T. Sansom, Sarah E. Sansom và Sarah E. Beaumier đến Deerwater Realty LLC, 33-35 Conz St., và Maple Street, 910.000 đô la.Christopher E. Gobillot và Cindy L. Gobillot cho Jason Rodriguez và Naomi Rodriguez, 288 Riverside Drive, $ 252.500.Lawrence F. Bouley đến Peter Casey và Janet Casey, 85-87-89 Water St., $ 407.500.trái camNhà máy Echo LLC, đến Echo Real Real LLC, 61 R W Moore Ave., $ 910.000.Fred L. Heyes đến Noah W. Stone, 92 Butterworth Road, 37.500 đô la.Scott W. Green và Angela G. Green cho đến Kenneth J. Rogers, Jr., và Ashley E. Rogers, 11 Drive Drive, 180.000 đô la.CitiMortidor Inc. bởi luật sư, Servicelink LLC, luật sư, đến National Homebuyers LLC, 190 West Orange Road, 36.750 đô la.PalmerCharles J. Callahan và Barbara L. Callahan cho Matthew Lyons và Joy Lyons, 11 Winthrop St., $ 181.000.Derek A. Swallow và Jennifer A. Nuốt cho David G. Douillard và Theresa Douillard, 10 Diane St., 160.000 đô la.Russell Bukowski đến Mark A. Rehbein và Deborah Rehbein, 1025 Central St., Đơn vị D, 60.000 đô la.Đồng bằngSally A. Rivard và William Rivard cho David E. Filkins Jr., 13 Maple St., $ 33.000.Laura B. Filkins và Sean Brown cho David E. Filkins Jr., 13 Maple St., 33.000 đô la.Kenneth M. Horowitz đến Michelle Helms, Phố Đông, 66.000 USD.Mary R. Flahive, Mary R. Flahive, ủy thác, Charles V. Ryan, ủy thác, John J. Flahive Trust Revocable Trust và John F. Flahive Revocable Trust to Mary Flahive Dickson, Grant Street, 80.000 USD.Mary R. Flahive, Mary R. Flahive, ủy thác, Charles V. Ryan, ủy thác, John J. Flahive Trust Revocable Trust và John F. Flahive Trust Revocable Trust to Mary Flahive Dickson, Grant Street, $ 100.ShelburneCoreen M. Klepadlo, "còn gọi là" Coreen M. Young, đến Joseph S. Rae, 163 Smead Hill Road, 350.000 đô la.ShutesburyEdward J. Moskal đến Leonard A. Moskal, 56 Lake Drive, 75.000 USD.New Penn Financial LLC, MTGLQ Investors LP, bởi luật sư, Newrez LLC, luật sư và Dịch vụ thế chấp Shellpoint, luật sư, cho Paul Roud, 250 West Pelham Road, 117.000 đô la.Nam HadleyDenis B. Poirier và Mary Ann Poirier cho Mary Ann Poirier, người được ủy thác, Denis B. Poirier, người được ủy thác, Chứng nhận có thể hủy bỏ của Mary Ann Poirier, Mary Ann Poirier, người được ủy thác, người được ủy thác Mary Ann Poirier, 262 Đông St. và 262 Miller St., 100 đô la.Russell B. Jopson Jr., và Cynthia A. Jopson cho Russell B. Jopson Jr., ủy thác, Cynthia A. Jopson, ủy thác và Jopson Family Trust, 99 Pine Grove Drive, 100 đô la.Ronald W. McMahon đến Lynne A. Helems, 5 ngõ Greenwood, $ 233.500.Jaimarie G. Ely đến Gary A. Geanacopoulos và Jimmie M. Geanacopoulos, 20 Lawrence Ave., 140.000 đô la.NamwickFiore Realty Holdings LLC đến Doreen Dargon, Sawgrass Lane, $ 120.000.Wendi L. Mello đến Andrew Mark Ouimette, Đường 27 V Mort Vining, $ 460.000.SpringfieldAmat Victoria Curam LLC đến Naylor Nation Real Real LLC, Trung tâm 273-275, $ 560.000.Ngân hàng New York Mellon, ủy thác, và Ủy thác tài trợ thế chấp Novastar 2005-3, ủy thác, cho Anthony M. Santaniello và Aguasvivas Realty LLC, 47 Spikenard Circle, 150.675 đô la.Basile Realty LLC đến L & J Realty Group LLC, 331-335 Allen St., $ 680,000.Blueline Management LLC đến Mickey Lynn Banks III và Lauren Banks, 82 Hillside Dr., $ 215.000.Bretta Construction LLC đến Simmone Shortte, 73 Woodrow St., $ 329,900.Bruce A. Webster, đại diện, và Robin K. Moreland, bất động sản, đến Stratton Renovation LLC, 155 South Branch Parkway, 135.000 đô la.Carol Rivet và Michael Remy, đại diện, và Irene J. Remy, bất động sản, đến Dilenes Ortiz, 143 Redlands St., 160.000 đô la.Liên đoàn thế chấp quốc gia PGS. và Fannie Mae đến Glenn Robert Zuffelato, 23-25 ​​Algoquin, 123.688 đô la.CIG4 LLC đến Candice L. Cipolla, 93 Pine Grove St., $ 169,900.Dan Beauregard đến Joaquim Santos, 69 Sherman St., $ 115.000.Daniel P. Croken và Patricia A. Courtney-Croken đến Aguasvivas Realty LLC, 12-14 Howes St., $ 145.000.Darlene R. Setkewich đến Basile Realty LLC, 164 Grooween St., $ 100.000.Diane M. Smith-Jubrey cho James Githiri, 34 Collins St., $ 31.000.Dolores P. Santinelli đến Anthony N. Yeboah, 214 Belmont Ave., $ 121,750.Tập đoàn Đông Phương đến Yvette Ortiz, 33 Euclid Ave., 184.000 USD.Flora Tung và Tok Chang đến Suldan Mohamud và Abdikadir Abdi, 485 Dickinson St., $ 185.000.Gary Delogg đến Saha D. Biswa, 16-18 Rosemont St., $ 201.000.Hampden Realty LLC đến Erik White, 62-64 Lester St., $ 281.500.Irelisse Gomez đến John E. Torres-Astacio, 92-94 Manhattan St., 294.000 USD.Jael M. Williams đến Baystate Medical Center Inc., 133 Springfield St, $ 250.000.James W. Fiore, Darlene Fiore, Tina Fiore, Tina Carnevale và Sean A. Howard đến Yamilex Vega, 35 Powell Ave., 175.000 USD.Joseph M. O KhănBrien III, đại diện, và Kevin D. O vạchBrien, bất động sản, đến Julio A. Ortiz, 354-356 White St., 175.000 đô la.Juan A. Santana đến Reba Andrea Raudales, 23 Russell St., 200.000 USD.Kelly Regan và Michael E. Briotta cho Christopher T. Regan và Alanna B. Regan, 29 Bethel St., 103.000 đô la.Larisa Rudin đến Krystal A. Corbin, 122 Middlesex St., 179.000 USD.Lynn M. Gauthier và John E. Gauthier đến Misael Salas, 101-103 Knollwood St., 175.000 đô la.Nationstar Mortthing LLC và ông Cooper đến Rayan C. Abdulbaki, 129 Margerie St., 60.000 USD.Nationstar Mortthing LLC, Ông Cooper và Jacqueline E. Turner cho Ngân hàng Hoa Kỳ, ủy thác và Ủy thác chính của LSRMF MH II, ủy thác của 47 Wellington St., $ 115.206.NWO Realty Inc. đến New Look Realty Inc., 96-98 Cambridge St., $ 50.000.Ralph R. Clifford cho Revovized Renovations Inc., 60 Parkside St., $ 85.000.Ramon Sornoza, Ra Mon Sornoza, Raymond Sornoza và Gloria Sornoza đến Jose A. Maldonado Cruz, 356 Orange S.t, 160.000 USD.Robert W. Lacas Jr. để tốt nghiệp Dịch vụ nhà ở LLC, 104 Bristol St., $ 60.000.Rogelio Marquez đến Anthony Santiago và Angie V. Marquez, 84 Eleanor Road, 170.000 USD.Scott D. Hathaway và Colleen M. Hathaway cho Robert Gasteyer, người được ủy thác và 15 Railroad Avenue Realty Trust, ủy thác của, Sumner Avenue, 30.000 đô la.Thành phố Springfield đến C & C ngôi nhà LLC, 427 Bay St., $ 1.000.Three Star Properties LLC để Pride Limited Partnership, 1110 Wilbraham Road, $ 2,300.000.William N. Clarke và Dawn M. Clarke đến Tyron Austin và Shannon Austin, 85 S. Tallyho Dr., 205.000 đô la.Chủ nhậtEllen G. Kelleher đến Daniel J. Fisk và Cynthia M. McGuire, 238 North Main St., 450.000 USD.Xứ WalesKevin B. Sheehan, Robert E. Sheehan và Eleanor M. Sheehan đến Ronald White Jr. và Lisa White, 2 Debbie Lane, $ 257.397.đồCarol H. Koczur, Ernest J. Robidoux, Ernest J. Robidoux, đại diện cá nhân, và Barbara A. Robidoux, bất động sản, đến Sarah E. Haney và Nathan E. Haney, 257 Greenwich Road, $ 216.000.Sengen Properties LLC, đến Park Otis LLC, 48-58 Park St. và 14-20 Otis Ave., $ 1,035,000.Lawrence A. Lanier đến Michael David Bingle, 15 đường Malboeuf, 158.950 đô la.Leslie S. Rivera đến Patricia Mendez Lara và Jorge Martinez Mendez, 92 Nice St., $ 182,000.Tây Springfield215 đường phố Baldwin LLC đến Bear Den Holdings LLC, 215 đường phố Baldwin, $ 1.170.000.Amina Ali và Amina M. Ali đến Muhammad Taqi, 46-48 Allen St., $ 173,400.John R. Spano đến Steven R. NAF và Jennifer L. NAF, Đại lộ Grandview, 440.000 đô la.Lori Galda và David H. Edgerly đến Ziya Lachinov, 56-58 Fairview Ave., 180.000 đô la.Paul Kida đến Brian P. St. Amand, 38 đường Robinson, 107.500 đô la.Vincenzo Rettura đến SS Fund LLC, 1146 Memorial Ave., 365.000 đô la.White Church Realty LLC đến Andrew Oedel, Andrew H. Oedel, Melissa McClung và Melissa E. McClung, 732 Elm St., 450.000 USD.WestfieldCH Realty VII / CG MACT Bird LLC đến Western Ma EEM LLC, 90 South Maple St., $ 4,849,837.Donna Clarke, đại diện, và Donald R. Champiney, bất động sản, cho James Rivera II và Heather Elizabeth Johnston, 48 Grandview Dr., 265.000 đô la.Jason C. Pomeroy và Naoko Pomeroy cho Sarah Hopson, 75 Orchard St., $ 251.000.Kevin C. Kết nối với Tuyên bố tin cậy Dorota Bak, ủy thác và Dorota Bak, ủy thác, 1430 Russell Road, Đơn vị 9, $ 115.900.Blythewood Quản lý tài sản LLC đến SLF Realty Corp, 40 Montgomery St., $ 507.000.LP4 LLC đến FHB Realty LLP, 14 Sterling St., $ 230.000.Michael R. Leveille và Theresa M. Leveille đến Henry Girardin IV và Kathryn D. Girardin, 57 Pequot Point Road, 250.000 USD.Sandra Callahan cho Kevin C. Connors II và Evelyn E. Connors, 51 Riverside Drive, 232.750 đô la.Wilmington Trust, ủy thác và MFRA Trust 2015-1, ủy thác của Oscar P. Naula Naranjo, 54 Montgomery St., 105.000 đô la.Wilmington Savings Fund Society, ủy thác, và 019-1 RMF Mua lại ủy thác mua lại 2, ủy thác của Jacquelyn Laura Kazierad, 47 Zephyr Drive, 200.000 đô la.WilbrahamEdward K. Gray và Jacqueline S. Grey cho Jamie Shepard, 9 Inwood Drive, 269.750 đô la.Faissal Khachaneh đến Mouna Almasri, 3276 Đường Boston, 100 đô la.Jeffrey F. Wolcott và Donna Espinoza-Wolcott đến Mark Edgar và Lorna Edgar, 11 ngõ Victoria, $ 418.000.Virginia F. Barry đến Doreen Cickyham, 96 Vòng tròn thông cao, $ 356,400.[ad_2] Nguồn