#read aleph null

[robo7iic]

i forgot to post this here

[scourgeofshadows]

@clockworkreapers IT'S MEEE

Also I really fucking love your Aleph Null comic and couldn't resist imagining what if I'm in that au XDDD CHECK OUT THIS EPIC COMIC PLZZZ: Aleph Null (mspfa.com)

[pasteldustart]

love love love your art style!!! matches aleph nulls really well. had to actually check if you were the creator for a second haha

OH BLESS-

I do help with the comic but the original creator is @clockworkreapers

who is insanely talented and a huge inspiration for me so please please please check her artwork

will say i absolutely love Aleph Null and frequently daydream about the world fhkdjhgjfdhjkh

[edgeribz]

Have this comp of designs of the AN cast for Fallout Null.

I might just make a blog cuz the AU ended up being super elaborate...

Aleph Null made by @clockworkreapers this is your annual reminder to read the comic https://mspfa.com/?s=37159&p=1

[baxieblur-turnip]

hiii dw youre not being annoying!!! i appreciate the interaction it helps me feel less like im screaming into the void lol <3 if you wanna infodump about your au i would be sooo down to listen :3

yoo tysm!! :D :D :D i love your thoughts they're so fun :))

au stuff under the cut (be warned i have literally zero idea how to format this whoops) (obviously major story spoilers for Cassette Beasts loll):

basically another Cass Archangel AU, but more gradual. after all the time spent with Morgante's spirit inside of them (??) and the events of the final battle against Aleph Null, they lost their humanity somewhat.

queue gradual transition from 'human but slightly off' to 'yep that's definitely an Archangel' here! i am thinking about making this tie into Mordread due to the lack of any info whatsoever on him beyond the fact he's dead but that's undecided rn. i think it's cool how Cass seems connected to both rebellion and conquest (Helia mentioning it, i would attatch a screenshot but you probably know the scene) and that ties in there so that'd be fun

the transition shows in no longer needing to use cassettes for transforming (they choose to do so for convenience's sake though - so much easier + cassette bonus health you don't get without), the static effect of transformation being a thing that flares up sometimes - like if shocked there will be a burst of sparks for example.

whole bunch of angsty potential here if i ever gain the confidence to write! their body changes and they're not sure what to make of this - it's cool but also they're not exactly happy they're basically an Archangel now after the whole main story drama. their friends help them cope though so it's fine (mostly). if i end up tying this in with Mordread then also that would come with so much drama

bonus thing: Cass doesn't immediately choose to return home due to emotional baggage and feeling they have unfinished business. then they freak out in 'what if they don't want me back what have i become would they even recognise me' - bonus points here as they're trans (NB) and used New Wirral as a way to come out to people for the first time! the way it gradually changes your body in the normal New Wirral way means they feel even if they were normal, they wouldn't be recognised back home. woohoo i love making my characters suffer :))

maybe this is sort of a reference to how Cassette Beasts was 90% of my non-binary awakening augh

someday i will find the confidence to actually draw this i swear

if this premise has already been used, genuinely i haven't seen it before (and if so, awesome!! haha) and i am sorry

anyway!! i hope that wasn't too painful to read lol i had a lot of fun writing it either way :D thank you so much it means a ton to me that people are interested. like so so much. ive never talked about this before so it's amazing having someone who actually wants to listen thank you

[alanbecker-pureconfessions]

Welcome to Alan Becker Pure Confessions!

⚠️This blog has no limitations on adult content. You have been warned.

In order to make your experience as comfortable as possible, please read the following:

Confessions that mention real people who are NOT affiliated with Alan Becker’s team, will be deleted. This includes “vagueposting” and generalized statements about groups of people sharing an idea/headcanon.

Confessions that are not related to any Alan Becker media will be deleted.

Media posts are disabled.

“Adult Content” is defined as any confession containing discussions of: heavy gore, sexual and fetish concepts, and other taboo subject matter at the owner’s discretion.

Adult Content will be marked with a label.

These rules are subject to change at any time.

The Owner of this blog (I, me), @aleph-abet-null , will NOT comment on any confession. The opinion of any confession does not reflect my own.

Non-anon confessions will be deleted to protect confessee privacy.

Confessions of any age rating are welcome.

Confessions will NOT be posted in any main tags (alan becker, animator vs animation, etc)

Please do NOT promote this blog or reblog any confessions to the official Alan Becker Tumblr Community, even if the confession is SFW.

Please enjoy your stay.

[goodluckclove]

Anyone who's read Blind Trust will know the basics of how a Lover's Knot is essentially a prison meant to take two overwhelmingly powerful birthrights and combine them into one identity too contended to cause much trouble.

This is unnerving for Scott and Edgar, who are very much two separate human beings. So as Migration Patterns winds down the question lingers - what would a real Lover's Knot look like? One that developed the way it was supposed to?

Cases have existed before but they have no interest in making themselves known. Luckily, there's a living Lover's Knot killing time right adjacent to Bluerose in Portland, Oregon!

Meet Aleph Null!

Both of these people are Aleph Null. They use any pronouns since they are a cis man and a cis woman. They also don't really care enough about other people to worry about how they get referred to. They met as children and developed together until their psyches eventually merged, erasing their previous identities and creating Aleph - the name they ended up choosing for themselves.

Aleph is 124 years old, but appears to be in their mid-thirties. Their hair is not naturally greyed, but they dye it grey out of respect for their age. They live in the penthouse of the Benton Hotel in downtown Portland and enjoy a life of luxury funded by a long-time career in art forgery. In between auctions and big sales they're also known to steal from ATMs and run other smaller, less-involved scams.

They are deeply active in the kink scene of Portland, despite being romantically faithful to one very boring man. Aleph is unhinged, intoxicated - definitely a semi-immortal up to try anything once. They only cared about themselves until they met Roderick from the Stamp Museum, and now they only care about themselves and Roderick.

This is Rod. He's like 31 and he's the manager of a small stamp museum in a dead mall. He's truly passionate about old stamps and history as a whole. Most people find him deeply boring but Aleph thinks he is the most interesting and sexually virile man they have ever met. When Aleph is done closing up the Stamp Museum that he works at for minimum wage, alongside people who space out when he starts to talk, he takes the Max back home to the Benton where he is immediately ravished by his dual-bodied lover and then fed room service and champagne.

Yeah Scott and Edgar are in for the existential crisis of their lives.

[ohmewhatsthis]

Project Moon and The Infinite Loops Project

hi it's me back again with things that appeal to Me and Me Alone- or maybe not, considering the various PM quests on Sufficient Velocity? anyway, have a smattering of crossover thoughts

(i know the basics of TILP but i'm not an expert so if i'm wrong about something im sorry-)

It probably took a while to get the PM-verse looping at all. Considering the setting, finding Anchors would be a hard pressed task.

My suggestions (yes I have multiple) would be Binah and Vergilius.

Binah and Hokma are explicitly the only Sephirot to remember all the TT2 loops, and Binah especially has stated she is unable to go mad due to her mechanical body. Hokma has to die to become a Sephirot, so I'm less sure of him, but I think he'd Awaken after her in due time.

(i'm a bit worried about what might happen in LoR considering Binah needs to fight there but no one truly *dies* dies there so it's probably fine?)

Considering that Binah and the rest of the Library crew gets shunted out at the end of LoR though, I think Vergilius would serve as a good Anchor candidate (though I haven't read Leviathan yet so maybe it's less of a good idea-)

Speaking of Limbus, the Mirror seems like it could be tricky to work around since it can basically tap into different Loops, in a way; that said, it would be very funny if someone extracted a Naruto ID-

Also, Taii from Wonderlab, as an Anchor maybe? They are noted to be pretty psychologically stable and are strong enough to manifest their own E.G.O. What's staying my hand is the troubled state of the comic (while I don't think it's been made non canon, it was wiped off the internet) and the fact they're in a spin off.

The Head is absolutely Loop Aware, they just don't give a shit. Carmen might or might not be, but I don't think she'd stop herself from preying on Loopers (cough cough Sakura?) assuming someone doesn't grab her by the incorporeal neck and chokeslam her

In terms of crossovers, I have this one plot bunny where Twilight Awakens in place of X, with Moondancer as her Angela and her friends as the Sephirot. Because, if you think about it, the Seed of Light is just the multiverse's least ethical version of the Elements of Harmony (see also: Celestia Carmen (can't be any worse than CelestAI or that Slavequestria version))

Any Loopers that Loop in as abnos are going to be like, ALEPH and up, for sure, unless it's a Null loop.

The RWBY crew as a Fixer Office (Ruby Office?) or as Limbus sinners

I've said this before, but any of the Persona Loopers using Abnos as Personae or running into Carmen

that's all i have right now, feel free to add on, maybe i'll think of more later

[woodswolf]

dogs leading dogs by Woodswolf

chapter 4: depression (aleph null)

He’s so, so scared, but they don’t know why. He explains it to them, gradually, stiltedly: this is a test, for all of them. Tomorrow, they will come back here, and they will run the course they’ve set for themselves. If they succeed, he says, they will be ready. They need to be ready.

read chapter on ao3

read from beginning

[clockworkreapers]

I was reading Aleph Null yesterday and stumbled across ur page shortly after, and I have a question,

In the current situation in the comic, are Crysuk and Sauron officially matesprits or just crushing? Because they don’t kiss or call each other matesprits in the comic but when I see them on your page they are described as matesprits

That’s because they aren’t yet! The comic happens in their past maybe a sweep or so in the past. This is essentially how they met each other and how all my characters got to know each other. I can’t say much on specifics but all of my main 6 know each other in the future.

As for the boys at this point in their lives in the comic they are hardly anything but coworkers. Cy is probably a bit more interested in Sauron as just bace level hey we get along I like your company and I can’t put up with anyone besides Majell at the moment. Sauron evidently is a bit of an oblivious idiot when it comes to relationships. It will be spoken about later as to why but both of them have some unresolved personal issues in that area. That will need some time to get to though, for now they have only known each other for around 2 weeks their time (Alternian weeks in AN are like 16 days) and they have quite a bit more time to get to know each other better and a lot more to go through to have room for an actual relationship.

[stuart-boehmer]

TWO DISCOVERIES IN MATHEMATICAL PHILOSOPHY

1  HYPERNUMBERS

            First, allow me to interject that the idea that I am about to describe seems more extensive than the hyper-reals of non-standard analysis and is not to be confused with them.

            The hyper-reals, in my understanding (and I haven’t yet thoroughly studied non-standard analysis, so this may be a mis-perception), are just an alternative description of the real number system with the same cardinality of the reals—the power set of the naturals, c := 2^(aleph-null).  according to a book I have on non-standard analysis by Mark Davis published in 1977 & 2005, to the date of publication, only one theorem of real analysis has been proven by non-standard methods—not too powerful a method?

            Now to describe what I mean by “hyper-numbers:” H1 is the first class of hypernumber, of cardinality of the power set of the reals, c1 := 2^c.  The “integers” of this number system are reals, with the density of the reals—no “first,” “second,” &c., integers & the “digits” of a hyper-number of first class are reals, with the density of the reals—no “first,” “second,” &c., digits.

            From this, we can likewise define hyper-numbers of the second class, H2 = power set of those of the first class, whose “integers” and “digits” are H1 numbers, with the density of H1 numbers.  This set has cardinality c2 := 2^c1.

            And, more generally, we can continue in a sequence of HN with cardinality cN := 2^c(N-1), where N is any finite natural number. Consider N = 100, N= 1,000,000, or N = 2^100!

            Mind blowing!

            I’d like to study this theory in detail someday, maybe establishing a formal theory by proving a few seminal theorems.  Right now, I’m still busy completing and writing up my theory of black holes for publication in a peer-reviewed journal (as you may know if you’ve been reading my prior missives)—pretty bland stuff by comparison, no?

2  THE INEFFABLES. IDEALISM AND REALITY.

            In quantum theory there is the well-known Wigner Probability Density Distribution [WQPD], which is not necessarily globally > or = 0 (and what, pray tell, does it mean that your chances of, say, getting lung cancer under certain circumstances is -5%?).  In quantum theory, however, it remains the case that the probability density of a single observable is always globally > or = 0.   This seems to have something to do with the hypothesis that any discrete or single (continuous) observable has a presumed exact value that can be determined exactly in a single measurement (while, for example, q, position, and p, momentum, cannot both be determined exactly simultaneously—the uncertainty principle +, really, only one thing can be measured at a time; perhaps this has something to do with why the WQPD may sometimes be < 0).

            But what quantity can be measured to arbitrary precision with any real measuring instrument (I mean out to aleph-null decimal places), and in what conceivable machine or human memory device could all these digits be recorded or written down for even just one measurement, let alone scads of them?

            Thus, I conjecture that not even the probability of a single (continuous) observable or variable need be globally > or = 0—and, indeed, why not dispense as well with the stipulation that it be normalized to unity (i.e., that the “total probability” = 100%)?  What if sometimes the attempt to measure a quantity didn’t result in anything that could be represented by a number, or that, though it was in principle a number, it couldn’t be measured or calculated (like Chaitin’s Omega—the “probability” that a computer program loaded with a specific input would ever stop and not get caught in an infinite loop [the Turing “halting problem”])?

            This brings me to my concept of “ineffables”—things that cannot, even in principle, be expressed by measurable or calculable “numbers” (isn’t the number concept itself an ineffable itself—WHAT IS a “number” [or, similarly, WHAT DOES it “mean” to “mean”?].  Mind you, I’m not looking for definitions in terms of other words—the attempt to describe an infinite reality with a paltry 100,000 or 300,000 words [the English language, the language with the most extensive vocabulary by far on earth] is really pathetic, and, ultimately, a vicious circle [all the words in a dictionary must be defined by other words—or by “pointing” to something: when you point to something, a dog will assume you’re trying to draw attention to your finger, not the object being “pointed” to—and, how do you point to “love” or “growth”?]).

            Ineffables that we can mention, besides Chaitin’s Omega, are Cantor’s “Absolute” (infinity), which he associated with God, and consciousness, not to mention “color” (I mean the raw, conscious experience of a color, not its wavelength or frequency—I very much doubt that telling a congenitally blind person that the wavelength of blue light is 4000 Angstroms would in any way convey what a sighted person experiences as the sky).

            What of the phenomenon of synesthesia, where a person might associate colors with music or numbers?  And who says that what I experience as blue, if I could experience it through your sensory system, I might not experience as teal or red—or the note C-flat (synesthesia again!)?  Science can describe only the “average,” “typical” case—these machines that can determine what a person is thinking about fairly accurately describe only what is common in the experience—what can be described in the public sphere.  To what is atypical or unique in an experience—the private, subjective, world—science will forever be blind.  Study your Nietzsche!—these things have been known a long time!

            Mind blowing!

            This is another thing that makes my continued interest in black hole theory look bland by comparison, no?

            The notion that “empirical facts” can always be reduced quantitatively to numbers is hereby completely exploded.  And the Hawkings of the world are not concerned with matters of “mere” philosophy!  They’re missing half the fun!  Why DO we perform our experiments if not precisely to interpret them and adjust our pardi pris to what they are trying so desperately to tell us about how the world really is—do we continue to stick to our dogmas in defiance of proper understanding of the evidence?  Are we just to be content with the literal results of our piddlin’ experiments conducted in the sterile, controlled environment of the laboratory and not venture a guess as to what might be happening in the “wild?”

            My feelings towards religion are mixed—part Hobbesian materialistic, quantitative atheist/tea kettle agnostic (Russell’s phrase), part Berkeleyian fundamentalist idealist-theist.  There are NO certainties in life—but how much education is required to understand this!  I would venture that the entire purpose of education (as opposed to the vocational training that the modern university system has devolved into) is precisely to depart some sense of just how small the collective knowledge of Man is (Feynman once famously calculated that every document ever produced—most of it the dross of phone books, suspense novels, restaurant receipts, X-rated movies, &c; the true knowledge is a very small percentage of even this tiny amount—could be stored on an ideal memory device of approximately one cubic centimeter—one seventeenth of a cubic inch!), let alone what is known to a single individual, be he a sports news anchor or the highest of artistic geniuses.

            Dogma is never pretty nor correct. How arrogant—let alone unimaginative—is a person to think that he is in possession of even a single atom of the “Truth!”

            As a banner in a church I attend states, “God is too big to fit into one religion.”

            COEXIST!!

[brickwall2]

TWO DISCOVERIES IN MATHEMATICAL PHILOSOPHY

1  HYPERNUMBERS

            First, allow me to interject that the idea that I am about to describe seems more extensive than the hyper-reals of non-standard analysis and is not to be confused with them.

            The hyper-reals, in my understanding (and I haven’t yet thoroughly studied non-standard analysis, so this may be a mis-perception), are just an alternative description of the real number system with the same cardinality of the reals—the power set of the naturals, c := 2^(aleph-null).  according to a book I have on non-standard analysis by Mark Davis published in 1977 & 2005, to the date of publication, only one theorem of real analysis has been proven by non-standard methods—not too powerful a method?

            Now to describe what I mean by “hyper-numbers:” H1 is the first class of hypernumber, of cardinality of the power set of the reals, c1 := 2^c.  The “integers” of this number system are reals, with the density of the reals—no “first,” “second,” &c., integers & the “digits” of a hyper-number of first class are reals, with the density of the reals—no “first,” “second,” &c., digits.

            From this, we can likewise define hyper-numbers of the second class, H2 = power set of those of the first class, whose “integers” and “digits” are H1 numbers, with the density of H1 numbers.  This set has cardinality c2 := 2^c1.

            And, more generally, we can continue in a sequence of HN with cardinality cN := 2^c(N-1), where N is any finite natural number. Consider N = 100, N= 1,000,000, or N = 2^100!

            Mind blowing!

            I’d like to study this theory in detail someday, maybe establishing a formal theory by proving a few seminal theorems.  Right now, I’m still busy completing and writing up my theory of black holes for publication in a peer-reviewed journal (as you may know if you’ve been reading my prior missives)—pretty bland stuff by comparison, no?

2  THE INEFFABLES. IDEALISM AND REALITY.

            In quantum theory there is the well-known Wigner Probability Density Distribution [WQPD], which is not necessarily globally > or = 0 (and what, pray tell, does it mean that your chances of, say, getting lung cancer under certain circumstances is -5%?).  In quantum theory, however, it remains the case that the probability density of a single observable is always globally > or = 0.   This seems to have something to do with the hypothesis that any discrete or single (continuous) observable has a presumed exact value that can be determined exactly in a single measurement (while, for example, q, position, and p, momentum, cannot both be determined exactly simultaneously—the uncertainty principle +, really, only one thing can be measured at a time; perhaps this has something to do with why the WQPD may sometimes be < 0).

            But what quantity can be measured to arbitrary precision with any real measuring instrument (I mean out to aleph-null decimal places), and in what conceivable machine or human memory device could all these digits be recorded or written down for even just one measurement, let alone scads of them?

            Thus, I conjecture that not even the probability of a single (continuous) observable or variable need be globally > or = 0—and, indeed, why not dispense as well with the stipulation that it be normalized to unity (i.e., that the “total probability” = 100%)?  What if sometimes the attempt to measure a quantity didn’t result in anything that could be represented by a number, or that, though it was in principle a number, it couldn’t be measured or calculated (like Chaitin’s Omega—the “probability” that a computer program loaded with a specific input would ever stop and not get caught in an infinite loop [the Turing “halting problem”])?

            This brings me to my concept of “ineffables”—things that cannot, even in principle, be expressed by measurable or calculable “numbers” (isn’t the number concept itself an ineffable itself—WHAT IS a “number” [or, similarly, WHAT DOES it “mean” to “mean”?].  Mind you, I’m not looking for definitions in terms of other words—the attempt to describe an infinite reality with a paltry 100,000 or 300,000 words [the English language, the language with the most extensive vocabulary by far on earth] is really pathetic, and, ultimately, a vicious circle [all the words in a dictionary must be defined by other words—or by “pointing” to something: when you point to something, a dog will assume you’re trying to draw attention to your finger, not the object being “pointed” to—and, how do you point to “love” or “growth”?]).

            Ineffables that we can mention, besides Chaitin’s Omega, are Cantor’s “Absolute” (infinity), which he associated with God, and consciousness, not to mention “color” (I mean the raw, conscious experience of a color, not its wavelength or frequency—I very much doubt that telling a congenitally blind person that the wavelength of blue light is 4000 Angstroms would in any way convey what a sighted person experiences as the sky).

            What of the phenomenon of synesthesia, where a person might associate colors with music or numbers?  And who says that what I experience as blue, if I could experience it through your sensory system, I might not experience as teal or red—or the note C-flat (synesthesia again!)?  Science can describe only the “average,” “typical” case—these machines that can determine what a person is thinking about fairly accurately describe only what is common in the experience—what can be described in the public sphere.  To what is atypical or unique in an experience—the private, subjective, world—science will forever be blind.  Study your Nietzsche!—these things have been known a long time!

            Mind blowing!

            This is another thing that makes my continued interest in black hole theory look bland by comparison, no?

            The notion that “empirical facts” can always be reduced quantitatively to numbers is hereby completely exploded.  And the Hawkings of the world are not concerned with matters of “mere” philosophy!  They’re missing half the fun!  Why DO we perform our experiments if not precisely to interpret them and adjust our pardi pris to what they are trying so desperately to tell us about how the world really is—do we continue to stick to our dogmas in defiance of proper understanding of the evidence?  Are we just to be content with the literal results of our piddlin’ experiments conducted in the sterile, controlled environment of the laboratory and not venture a guess as to what might be happening in the “wild?”

            My feelings towards religion are mixed—part Hobbesian materialistic, quantitative atheist/tea kettle agnostic (Russell’s phrase), part Berkeleyian fundamentalist idealist-theist.  There are NO certainties in life—but how much education is required to understand this!  I would venture that the entire purpose of education (as opposed to the vocational training that the modern university system has devolved into) is precisely to depart some sense of just how small the collective knowledge of Man is (Feynman once famously calculated that every document ever produced—most of it the dross of phone books, suspense novels, restaurant receipts, X-rated movies, &c; the true knowledge is a very small percentage of even this tiny amount—could be stored on an ideal memory device of approximately one cubic centimeter—one seventeenth of a cubic inch!), let alone what is known to a single individual, be he a sports news anchor or the highest of artistic geniuses.

            Dogma is never pretty nor correct. How arrogant—let alone unimaginative—is a person to think that he is in possession of even a single atom of the “Truth!”

            As a banner in a church I attend states, “God is too big to fit into one religion.”

            COEXIST!!

[scholar-of-yemdresh]

This Post.

I'm finally doing it! A list of Adult (20s+) Nonbinary/Genderqueer/Transneutral and Trans men rep in SFF books(no romantasy). This will only be limited to main or major characters.

I've not read everything on this list, so some information could be inaccurate or missing e.g I might not know that a character is actually a POC or 40s+. I will also advise to check content warnings because some of the books listed here can get pretty gnarly.

Will occasional be updated

Keys: 🏳️‍⚧️=Trans Author,✊🏾= Author of Colour,🌈=POC,🧓🏾=40s+, ♂️= Trans man , ⚧️= Nonbinary,🎨=Comic

Claude from The Chatelaine by Kat Heartfield ♂️

Tarquin Mercator from The Devoured Worlds by Megan E. o'keefe ♂️

Yari from Master of Poisons by Andrea Hairston ⚧️🧓🏾🌈✊🏾

Sol Katz from Dead Collections by Issac Fellman 🏳️‍⚧️♂️🧓🏾

Rosie from Persephone Station by Stina Leicht ⚧️🧓🏾

Rafe from Viscera by Gabrielle Squailia🏳️‍⚧️♂️

John Wyndham from The Affair of the Mysterious Letter by Alexis Hall ♂️

Casey Ravel from the Ballad of Perilous Graves by Alex Jennings ♂️🌈✊🏾

Ardent Violet from The Starmetal Symphony by Alex White🏳️‍⚧️⚧️

Gyen Jebi from Phoenix Extravagant by Yoon Ha Lee ⚧️🏳️‍⚧️✊🏾🌈

Shock Pao from Shock Pao by Ren Warom ♂️

Firuz-e Jafari from the Bruising of Qilwa by Naseem Jamnia 🌈✊🏾🏳️‍⚧️⚧️

Iktan from Between Earth and Sky by Rebecca Roanhorse ⚧️🌈✊🏾

Chih from the Singing Hills Cycle by Nghi Vo ⚧️✊🏾🌈

Brennus from Wolf Among the Wild Hunt by Merc Fenn Wolfmoor ⚧️🏳️‍⚧️

Dex from Monk & Robot by Becky Chambers 🌈(?)⚧️

Anima from In The Watchful City by S. Qiouyi Lu ⚧️🌈✊🏾🏳️‍⚧️

Eolo from The Raven Tower by Ann Leckie ♂️

Ridley from No Gods,No Monsters by Cadwell Turnbull 🌈✊🏾♂️

Enae & Qven from Translation State by Ann Leckie⚧️🌈🧓🏾

Penfield R. Henderson, Aiden Chase, Blithe + others from Future Feeling by Joss Lake 🏳️‍⚧️♂️

Ilan from The Faithful Dark by Cate Baumer♂️

Various from The Tensorate by Neon Yang 🏳️‍⚧️✊🏾🌈⚧️♂️

Alex Easton from What Moves the Dead by T.Kingfisher⚧️

Edie from Hammajang Luck by Makana Yamamoto⚧️🏳️‍⚧️🌈✊🏾

Nameless Man from The Four Profound Weaves by R.B. Lemberg🌈🏳️‍⚧️♂️🧓🏾

Arén from A Promise Broken by S.L. Dove Cooper♂️

Erígra Lilún from The Unbalancing by R.B. Lemberg 🏳️‍⚧️⚧️

Claire|Claude from Baker Thief by Claudie Arseneault ⚧️

Dianthus from The Fate of by J.E. Lynn ⚧️

Asa from The Forgotten Lyric by Carolina Cruz⚧️🌈

Sal Hernandez from It Took Luke by Mark Bouchard & Bayleigh Underwood 🎨⚧️🌈🏳️‍⚧️

MCs from Time Will Devour His Children by Otava Heikkila🎨🏳️‍⚧️♂️🧓🏾🌈

Jonah from Dominion of Blades by Matt Dinniman♂️

Tet Sang from The Order of the Pure Moon Reflected in Water by Zen Cho♂️or⚧️🌈✊🏾

Marcus from Lesser Known Monsters by Rory Michaelson♂️🌈

Scorn from Emergent Properties⚧️

Misery Nomaki from The Genesis of Misery by Neon Yang✊🏾🏳️‍⚧️🌈⚧️

Taigan from The Worldbreaker Saga by Kameron Hurley⚧️🌈

Leiander from The Stones Stay Silent by Danny Ride♂️🏳️‍⚧️

The Plauge Doctor from The Salt Grows Heavy by Cassandra Khaw⚧️🏳️‍⚧️✊🏾

Aleph Null from Test by Christopher Sebela & Jen Hickman🎨⚧️

Joel Lodowick from My Heart Is Human by Reese Hogan🏳️‍⚧️♂️

Jules from Finna by Nino Cipri 🌈⚧️🏳️‍⚧️

Dax from Shatter Minds by L.R Lam🌈♂️

Scout from The Last Gifts of the Universe by Riley August⚧️

Avery Ryu from Dead Space by Kali Wallace🌈⚧️

[pasteldustart]

HAPPY LATE 4 YEARS!!! Read Aleph Null do it coward

fr though I absolutely love reading and helping on this comic,The team are bloody incredible at what they do and are constantly surprising and inspiring me.

Read it here -> Aleph Null

[anistarrose]

[ID: tumblr tags by @weltinator reading: "concept of infinite different infinities actually statistical error. georg cantor who lived in a cave and defined 10000 well ordered sets every day has a cardinal number greater than aleph null adn could not have been counted. i don't know anything about math." End ID.]

you know enough about math to be vastly, vastly funnier than me on my own post!

"God created the integers; all the rest is the work of man" is a quote so raw you'd think it's from fanfiction, but it's actually from Leopold Kronecker, who hated the concept of infinite different infinities so much that he accused fellow mathematician Georg Cantor of "corrupting the youth"

[mr-tsuyo]

Art Trade I did with @clockworkreapers