#san francisco software testing experts

[mariacallous]

The Biden administration is asking the world’s largest technology companies to publicly commit to tightening the digital security of their software and cloud services.

The voluntary pledge, first reported by WIRED, represents the latest effort by the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to build support for its Secure by Design initiative, which encourages tech vendors to prioritize cybersecurity while developing and configuring their products.

By signing the pledge, companies promise to make a “good-faith effort” to implement seven critical cybersecurity improvements, ranging from soliciting reports of vulnerabilities in their products to expanding the use of multi-factor authentication, a technology that adds an extra login step to the traditional password.

The pledge—which CISA plans to announce at the RSA cybersecurity conference in San Francisco next week—poses a major test for CISA, which last week marked the one-year anniversary of its Secure by Design campaign. The initiative is a top priority of CISA’s leadership, but it has produced mixed results, with some companies continuing to flout its urgent advice. The tech industry’s reaction to the pledge—and especially the number of software giants that sign it—will serve as a litmus test for how the private sector views CISA’s continuing push for increased corporate investment in cybersecurity.

“We're really excited about the companies that are on board,” Eric Goldstein, CISA’s executive assistant director for cybersecurity, tells WIRED. He declined to say how many vendors have already signed the pledge, but he says they include some “really significant” players in the tech industry.

WIRED asked more than three dozen of the biggest software companies whether they had signed or planned to sign the pledge. Only a handful responded. Login technology provider Okta said it had signed, while security vendor BlackBerry said it was considering doing so. Notably, software giants Amazon, Google, and Microsoft did not say whether they were signing.

“CISA says they have 50 companies that are signing and giving quotations to put on the website,” says a tech industry official familiar with the matter, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. “I don’t know any company that has signed.”

The seven goals laid out in the pledge represent security practices that experts say would dramatically improve companies’ cyberdefenses and make it easier for customers to safely use their products.

The goals include significantly increasing users’ use of multi-factor authentication, including by automatically enabling it or prodding users to activate it; eliminating default passwords, including by requiring users to choose strong passwords at product setup; and making it easier for customers to understand hacks of products they use, including by letting them review logs of suspicious network activity for free.

Companies signing the pledge would also commit to hardening their products against entire classes of vulnerabilities, such as by using memory-safe programming languages that completely block memory-based attacks; fostering better software patching, including by making patching easier and automating it when possible; creating vulnerability disclosure programs that encourage users to find and report product flaws; and publishing timely alerts about major new vulnerabilities, as well as including detailed information in all new vulnerability alerts.

The pledge offers examples of how companies can meet the goals, although it notes that companies “have the discretion to decide how best” to do so. The document also emphasizes the importance of companies publicly demonstrating “measurable progress” on their goals, as well as documenting their techniques “​​so that others can learn.”

CISA developed the pledge in consultation with tech companies, seeking to understand what would be feasible for them while also meeting the agency’s goals, according to Goldstein. That meant making sure the commitments were feasible for companies of all sizes, not just Silicon Valley giants.

The agency originally tried using its Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative to prod companies into signing the pledge, according to the tech industry official, but that backfired when companies questioned the use of an operational cyberdefense collaboration group for “a policy and legal issue,” the industry official says.

“Industry expressed frustration about trying to use the JCDC to obtain pledges,” the official says, and CISA “wisely pulled back on that effort.”

CISA then held discussions with companies through the Information Technology Sector Coordinating Council and tweaked the pledge based on their feedback. Originally, the pledge contained more than seven goals, and CISA wanted signatories to commit to “firm metrics” for showing progress, according to the industry official. In the end, this person says, CISA removed several goals and “broadened the language” about measuring progress.

John Miller, senior vice president of policy, trust, data, and technology at the Information Technology Industry Council, a major industry trade group, says that change was smart, because concrete progress metrics—like the number of users using multi-factor authentication—could be “easily misconstrued.”

Goldstein says the number of pledge signatories is “exceeding my expectations about where we’d be” at this point. The industry official says they’re not aware of any company that has definitively refused to sign the pledge, in part because vendors want to “keep open the option of signing on” after CISA’s launch event at RSA. “Everyone’s in a kind of wait-and-see mode.”

Legal liability is a top concern for potential signatory companies. “If there ends up being, inevitably, some type of security incident,” Miller says, “anything [a] company has said publicly could be used in lawsuits.”

That said, Miller predicts that some global companies facing strict new European security requirements will sign the US pledge to “get that credit” for something they already have to do.

CISA’s Secure by Design campaign is the centerpiece of the Biden administration’s ambitious plan to shift the burden of cybersecurity from users to vendors, a core theme of the administration’s National Cybersecurity Strategy. The push for corporate cyber responsibility follows years of disruptive supply-chain attacks on critical software makers like Microsoft, SolarWinds, Kaseya, and Change Healthcare, as well as a mounting list of widespread software vulnerabilities that have powered ransomware attacks on schools, hospitals, and other essential services. White House officials say the pattern of costly and often preventable breaches demonstrates the need for increased corporate accountability.

The Biden administration is using the federal government’s contracting power to set new minimum security standards for the software that agencies buy, with the goal of modeling responsible behavior for the entire industry. White House officials are also studying proposals to make all vendors, not just federal contractors, liable for security failures, but that effort faces an uphill battle in Congress.

With no authority to require better cybersecurity for the entire software industry, the White House has tasked CISA with prodding companies to commit to voluntary improvements. That effort began last April with the publication of specific recommendations for incorporating cybersecurity into the product design, development, and configuration process. CISA consulted with the tech industry and the security research community on refinements to that document and released an updated version last October. At around the same time, CISA announced that it had obtained Secure by Design commitments from six major K-12 educational technology vendors. That move, while limited to one industry, signaled CISA’s clear desire to convert its guidance into public corporate pledges.

“It has long been our goal … to move from just the white papers and the guidance to get companies to say, ‘Yes, we agree, and here’s what we're doing,’” Goldstein says. “The pledge really is that concrete manifestation of the guidance that we’ve been developing for a year.”

But the efficacy of the voluntary pledge remains to be seen. “Pledging companies will self-assess and self-report,” says Katie Moussouris, CEO and founder of Luta Security, “so only time will tell if they’ve effectively applied the measures and if the pledge proved to be an effective accountability mechanism.”

Miller says he expects the pledge to keep companies accountable because of the potential legal consequences of neglecting promised improvements. In the meantime, government officials are counting on customers to pressure vendors to both sign and abide by the pledge.

“Right now, we see the demand for safe and secure products to really be significant,” Goldstein says. “We think that … customer demand will drive that progress for us.”

[generativeinai]

Why Every Team Needs an AI Copilot Solution in 2025?

The modern workplace has never moved faster. As we step into 2025, the speed of innovation, the complexity of workflows, and the expectations for productivity have all reached new heights. To stay competitive and agile, companies are turning to a new kind of team member: the AI Copilot.

Much more than a tool, an AI Copilot is a context-aware digital assistant that collaborates with human workers—offering insights, automating tasks, streamlining decisions, and enhancing creativity. Let’s explore why every team, across industries and functions, needs an AI Copilot solution in 2025.

1. Boosts Productivity Without Burnout

Workloads are growing, but humans have limits. AI Copilots help close the gap between increasing demand and human capacity. By summarizing long documents, generating reports, drafting emails, or even writing code, AI can drastically reduce time spent on routine tasks.

Instead of working longer hours, teams work smarter.

Stat to know: According to McKinsey, generative AI can automate up to 60–70% of employee time in functions like marketing, software development, customer service, and legal.

2. Enhances Decision-Making with Data-Driven Insights

In 2025, data is more abundant than ever—but raw data is only useful if interpreted correctly and quickly. AI Copilots can synthesize large datasets in real-time, generate visualizations, spot trends, and even suggest actions based on predictive analytics.

This helps teams make faster, smarter decisions without waiting on analysts or dashboards.

3. Bridges Skill Gaps and Democratizes Expertise

Not every team has a data scientist, a legal expert, or a senior marketer on hand. AI Copilots can act as knowledge bridges—providing answers, generating compliant documents, and helping less-experienced team members punch above their weight.

Whether it’s a junior developer using AI to write more efficient code or a sales rep generating a tailored pitch deck, AI evens the playing field.

4. Fosters Creativity and Innovation

AI is not just for automation; it’s a powerful collaborator for brainstorming and content creation. Marketing teams use AI to generate campaign ideas. Product teams simulate user flows with AI-driven prototypes. Even C-level executives use copilots to test strategies and scenario plan.

AI enables creativity at speed and scale—making teams not only more efficient, but also more innovative.

5. 24/7 Operational Agility

AI Copilots never sleep. They’re available across time zones and can handle queries and tasks asynchronously. In remote and hybrid teams, this is a game changer. AI ensures that no information is lost, no task forgotten, and no opportunity delayed—whether your teammate is in San Francisco or Singapore.

6. Improves Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing

AI Copilots can act as team memory—summarizing meetings, keeping track of action items, tagging documents, and making relevant past knowledge accessible when it's needed. This reduces duplication of effort and keeps everyone on the same page, literally and figuratively.

7. Adapts to Every Role and Industry

From HR to finance, from software to healthcare, AI Copilots are not one-size-fits-all. They're increasingly customizable and integrate deeply with existing workflows and tools (Slack, Notion, Jira, Salesforce, etc.).

The result? Every team—from frontline workers to leadership—can benefit without needing to reinvent the wheel.

The Future Is Not Human vs. AI—It’s Human + AI

Organizations that adopt AI Copilots in 2025 will outperform those that don’t—not by replacing human talent, but by amplifying it. The teams of tomorrow will be defined by how well they leverage AI to extend their capabilities.

AI Copilots aren’t a luxury anymore—they’re a strategic necessity.

Conclusion

As AI matures and becomes more accessible, the real question isn’t whether to use an AI Copilot Solution, but how fast you can onboard one. Businesses that embrace this shift early will see exponential gains in performance, engagement, and innovation.

[lanabriggs]

The Role of Innovation Hubs in the Startup Ecosystem

Startups thrive in environments that foster creativity, collaboration, and access to key resources. Innovation hubs have emerged as essential spaces for early-stage companies, offering support that ranges from mentorship to funding opportunities. These hubs act as catalysts, helping startups refine their ideas, connect with investors, and navigate the challenges of scaling a business.

Michael Shvartsman, an experienced investor and entrepreneur, views innovation hubs as “dynamic ecosystems that accelerate progress by bringing together talent, resources, and opportunities under one roof.” He believes that these spaces not only help individual startups succeed but also strengthen the broader business landscape.

What Defines an Innovation Hub?

An innovation hub is a physical or virtual space designed to support startups and emerging businesses. These hubs often include coworking environments, incubators, accelerators, and research facilities. They provide access to mentorship, networking events, collaboration opportunities, and in some cases, direct investment.

The most successful innovation hubs are strategically located in areas with strong industry presence, proximity to universities, or access to technology and research institutions. Cities such as San Francisco, New York, Berlin, and Singapore have built thriving innovation hubs that attract entrepreneurs from around the world.

How Innovation Hubs Benefit Startups.

Startups often face barriers when launching their ideas — limited funding, lack of industry connections, and the challenge of proving their business model. Innovation hubs address these challenges by offering:

1. Access to Expert Guidance. Navigating the startup world can be overwhelming, especially for first-time entrepreneurs. Innovation hubs connect startups with experienced mentors, industry professionals, and business leaders who provide valuable insights. These experts help founders avoid common pitfalls, refine their strategies, and accelerate their growth.

2. Networking and Collaboration. Being surrounded by like-minded entrepreneurs creates opportunities for knowledge sharing and partnerships. Startups within an innovation hub can collaborate on projects, exchange ideas, and even join forces on new ventures.

3. Funding Opportunities. Many hubs have direct links to venture capital firms, angel investors, and government grant programs. Startups that operate within these environments often have an advantage when seeking financial backing, as investors are more likely to take an interest in ideas that emerge from structured support systems.

4. Access to Cutting-Edge Technology. Some innovation hubs provide startups with access to research labs, advanced software, or specialized equipment. This access allows companies to test and refine their ideas in ways they might not be able to on their own.

5. A Community That Encourages Growth. The entrepreneurial journey can be isolating, but innovation hubs create a sense of community where founders can share challenges, celebrate successes, and learn from each other. This type of environment fosters long-term resilience and motivation.

The Future of Innovation Hubs.

As technology and business landscapes evolve, innovation hubs are adapting to new trends. Many now focus on specific industries, such as fintech, healthcare, or sustainable energy, creating highly specialized support networks. Virtual hubs have also gained traction, allowing startups to access resources without being tied to a physical location.

Michael Shvartsman sees the continued growth of innovation hubs as a positive trend. “Startups succeed when they have the right mix of support and competition,” he says. “Innovation hubs provide an environment where businesses can test their ideas, receive guidance, and attract investors — all while staying connected to a community that pushes them to improve.”

Innovation hubs have become an essential part of the startup ecosystem, providing the structure and support needed for new businesses to thrive. By offering access to mentorship, funding, and collaboration, these hubs help entrepreneurs turn ideas into successful ventures.

For startups looking to scale efficiently, engaging with an innovation hub can be a strategic move. With the right environment, guidance, and network, young businesses can build strong foundations for long-term success.

[govindhtech]

AMD Infinity Guard, BeeKeeperAI Collaborate Secret Computing

AMD Infinity Guard

The prevalence of ransomware attacks and data breaches in recent years has made it difficult for important business sectors to collaborate. Reports state that organizations are unable to work with suppliers who are attempting to develop potentially ground-breaking apps or discoveries due to the risk posed by threat actors. To keep up the strict restrictions necessary for specific data sets, some businesses don’t even share data within. Researchers’ failure to obtain vital data impedes their capacity to conduct significant study in a number of fields, including government, banking, and healthcare.

Healthcare AI acceleration via a safe platform for algorithm creators and data custodians to collaborate

Data is Never Exchanged or Viewed

The data steward’s safe, HIPAA-compliant environment is where the data is never removed.

Processing Real-World and Protected Data

Employs primary data, which comes directly from the source, as opposed to artificial or de-identified data. Every time, the data is encrypted.

Never Is Intellectual Property Seen or Shared

The algorithm is always encrypted, both when it is uploaded to EscrowAI and when it is moving through the container to the data steward and inside the protected environment of the data steward.

Technology with Secure Enclaves

EscrowAI uses secure enclave technology to reduce the possibility of algorithm IP questioning and data exfiltration during computing.

Matchmaker and intermediary

BeeKeeperAI reduces the time, effort, and expenses of data projects by more than 50% by serving as a matchmaker and broker between data stewards and algorithm developers.

Alan Czeszynski, an expert in the security industry and the marketing and product development leader at BeeKeeperAI, was gracious enough to join me on the AMD EPYC TechTalk podcast series following the Confidential Computing Summit industry gathering in San Francisco. They talked about the state of security and how there has never been a greater need for better hardware and software safeguards.

BeeKeeperAI

EscrowAI, a technology that combines private and confidential computing technology to allow software developers, data scientists, and data owners to collaborate in trusted execution environments (TEE), is utilized by San Francisco-based BeeKeeperAI.

The technology of BeeKeeperAI ensures that an owner always has control over their data. In addition to offering end-to-end encryption and algorithmic and model encryption to safeguard intellectual property, BeeKeeper also applies the algorithm to the data. The business establishes a TEE in a cloud data storage environment after an algorithm is prepared to run against data. Consequently, the data is cut off from all stakeholders, including BeeKeeperAI, the cloud service provider, the data owner, and the owner of the algorithm.

Nobody can see what goes on within the TEE; everyone can only access the output to which they are legally permitted.

“Bring these parties together to enable development and testing of artificial intelligence and machine learning models,” according to Alan, is made possible by BeeKeeper’s secure environment.

Big large language models (LLMs) and generative AI have gained popularity, and as a result, businesses are now more conscious of the need to secure AI, according to Alan. Protecting every stage of the AI and machine learning lifecycle has received a lot of attention lately. According to Alan, this is one of the reasons private computing is starting to get a lot of traction.

Alan warns that legacy security solutions might not provide enough protection in the AI era. The problem with LLMs is that they essentially turn into enormous repositories of all your secrets if you wish to locally train them on your own data,” he continued.

While CISOs and IT administrators prioritize data protection, business managers and data scientists frequently place greater importance on obtaining the data required to develop models that improve the company. Alan claimed that it is far too common for the procedure of obtaining private, protected data to be difficult, costly, and time-consuming. He described a few of the intricate details.

It is usually necessary for parties to have detailed, extremely formal data-use agreements in place. There are often several restrictions on how the data can be interacted with. Audits have to be done, and they always have to. BeeKeeperAI eliminates the effort by offering a technical answer to many of these security challenges.

“Their goal is to eliminate that from the end user and basically take it upon selves,” Alan stated. “The platform then allows the true value, which is basically secure collaboration, getting access to the data, developing your models, being able to execute your AI, ML lifecycle in a secure environment.”

Alan acknowledged that the security features incorporated by AMD EPYC CPUs had strengthened BeeKeeperAI’s offerings. AMD Infinity Guard includes these technologies, such as Secure Encrypted Virtualization and Secure Nested Paging, or SEV-SNP. They prevent the contents of a virtual machine’s memory from being accessed by other VMs operating on the same system or the server they are operating on.

Alan also mentioned adaptability, which is another significant advantage of AMD EPYC. AMD have to provide [clients] a variety of possible platforms, and EPYC is a fantastic one,” said Alan. “In those situations, the safe paging feature of encrypted virtualization and secret containers or virtual machines based on the EPYC CPU is quite advantageous. One of the main advantages of utilizing EPYC processors is that algorithm developers no longer have to adhere to any certain OS type thanks to this lift-and-shift technique.”

Read more on govindhtech.com

[ailtrahq]

What if Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared in a way we previously hadn’t considered? The life story of a new candidate for the mysterious Bitcoin founder shares some similarities. The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious figure behind the world’s oldest cryptocurrency, remains arguably one of the biggest mysteries in crypto. Despite the significant passage of time since the publication of the original Bitcoin whitepaper, the identity of its author is still being debated. Who is Len Sassaman? The latest candidate being considered is Leonard “Len” Harris Sassaman, born in 1980 in Pennsylvania, USA. After his early education, Sassaman earned a diploma from The Hill School in 1998.  In the same year, he joined the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF),  an organization dedicated to developing Internet standards and protocols. In 1999, he moved to San Francisco and became part of the cypherpunk community.  He would later become one of the community’s most prominent members, and it is here that he developed an interest in privacy. After co-founding the CodeCon hacking convention in 2002, Sassaman pursued doctoral studies in cybersecurity and cryptography at the University of Louvain in 2006. While at Louvain, he was exposed to various projects, including Philip ZImmermann’s Pretty Good Privacy software. The pair collaborated on the Zimmerman-Sassaman key-signing protocol, a new method for creating digital signatures. Sassamann also distinguished himself by exposing vulnerabilities in the X.509 standards for public key certificates. He also actively participated in many cryptography conferences. Following an adolescent diagnosis of depression, Sassaman took his own life in 2011. Read more: 9 Crypto Wallet Security Tips To Safeguard Your Assets What Did Sassaman Say About Satoshi Nakamoto? Len Sassaman is one of the less obvious candidates for Nakamoto. No one has cited quotes from Sassaman about Bitcoin or its creator, leading to speculation the cryptographer never made public statements about the asset. However, some people close to Sassaman claim have made unverified claims he did not like Bitcoin and instead favored its demise. Read more: What Is Bitcoin? A Guide to the Original Cryptocurrency Is Sassaman Bitcoin’s Creator? What Experts Think Still, the link between Nakamoto and Sassaman is not baseless. Since 2021, circumstantial details around each one’s life appear to overlap. Sassaman worked with several cryptographers previously considered candidates for the Bitcoin creator. Among them are Zimmerman and computer scientist Hal Finney, the latter of whom was discussed in previous articles.  In addition, Sassaman favored anonymous mail servers and wrote code for them several times. His image has also been immortalized in Bitcoin’s blockchain. The monument to the late cryptographer has been widely disputed. Even though it was added by a community member who wanted to thank Sassaman for his contribution to cryptography, it is unclear how Sassaman’s input contributed to the creation of Bitcoin. Len Sassaman Monument | Source: Medium But arguably, the greatest dispute has been around the cause of Sassaman’s death and one of Nakamoto’s last known emails. Before his departure, the Bitcoin creator left an enigmatic message that “he had moved on to other things,” and was leaving Bitcoin in “good hands.” Had the mysterious creator announced a potential suicide without saying it outright? No one knows for sure, and theories diverge. Had Nakmato grown so disenchanted with the development of Bitcoin that he decided to leave? Probability Test: Is Len Sassaman Satoshi? Cryptographic Evidence: Len Sassaman did not use tools, private keys, or an account linked to Satoshi Nakamoto. Nevertheless, he was on the list of email recipients who received the Bitcoin whitepaper. In addition, the cryptographer was careful to encrypt and keep the data stored in his computer secret. To date, the data on his computer is still inaccessible. This could

explain why the Bitcoin balance in Satoshi’s cryptocurrency wallet has not changed in the last ten years. Cryptography Skills and Contribution:  Sassaman’s work on several cryptography projects suggests he had the requisite skills to create Bitcoin. Despite being in his twenties, he participated in several conferences on the subject and was considered an expert. But there’s more evidence. He also worked on the TCP/IP protocol on which Bitcoin runs. Similarities in Communication and Language: In addition to shared views on privacy, Sassaman and Nakamoto also had a similar way of expressing themselves. Although Sassaman was American, he wrote British news many times. However, as some point out, the cryptographer was not a fan of Bitcoin. In his view, recording transactions publicly threatened society, a viewpoint at odds with Satoshi’s vision of an open ledger. Community Acceptance: The crypto community is still divided on whether Len Sassaman is Satoshi Nakamoto. Those who favor this theory are in the minority. Do you have something to say about whether Len Sassaman could be Satoshi Nakamoto or anything else? Please write to us or join the discussion on our Telegram channel. You can also catch us on TikTok, Facebook, or X (Twitter).

[douchebagbrainwaves]

THE TROUBLE WITH THE NERDS

It may look Victorian, but a famous speaker. But in addition to such indirect competitors, I think you only need two kinds of solutions to this problem. Founders who succeed quickly don't usually realize how lucky they were. Theory: In US presidential elections, the more admirable it is. Those companies were apparently willing to establish subsidiaries wherever the experts wanted to live. But barring emergencies you have a specific idea you want to reach users, you do it consciously you'll do it even better. If another country wanted to establish a mediocre university, for an additional half billion or so you could have a great one. That's what you're addicted to. If Jessica was so important to launch fast is not so much that they've done work worth tens of billions of dollars, but that a applies to any mobile phone, and b avoid the danger of fooling yourself as well as negative. Few would be willing to claim that it doesn't matter much either way. In fact, it's suspiciously hard to find a field of math that truly has no practical use.

The cause must be external. There are things I know I learned from Paul Buchheit: it's better to start with no more than an outline of what you need to reproduce is those two or three founders sitting around a kitchen table deciding to start a silicon valley; you let one grow. With a startup, I think it's because they seem so formidable. Hype doesn't make satisfied users, at least not for something as complicated as technology. The degree of courage of past or present union leaders are somehow inferior. And even then they rarely said so outright. Next year you'll have to explain how your startup was viral.

Physics progressed faster as the problem became predicting observable behavior, instead of releasing a software update immediately, they had to submit their code to an intermediary who sat on it for a month and then rejected it because it contained an icon they didn't like? We thought Airbnb was a bad idea. Quiet is another matter. Com, which their friends at Parse took. He couldn't have afforded a minicomputer. But powerful as they are, they're not drifting. He was like an explorer looking for a territory to the north of him, I at least don't have any regrets over what might have been. As for the theory being obvious, as far as I can tell it isn't.

The ups and downs were more extreme than they were prepared for.1 Instead of version 1s to be superseded, the works they produced continued to attract new readers. It is, in some ways. And the fact that they have to be high, and if they try to be creative. One developer told me: As a result of their process, the App Store approval process is broken. On the subway back from the airport she asked Why is everyone smiling? This could become more common. Once you acknowledge that, you stop believing there is nothing else you could be called.2 Everyone knows you're supposed to buy when times are bad.

Their denial derives from two very powerful forces: identity, and lack of imagination. The record labels agreed, reluctantly. My oldest son will be 7 soon. But you have to pay as much for that. No doubt it was a waste of time to try to reverse the fortunes of a declining industrial town like Detroit or Philadelphia by trying to seem legit. So tablet makers should be thinking: what else can we give developers access to? A great university near an attractive town. People only have so many leisure hours a day, and TV is premised on such long sessions unlike Google, which prides itself on sending users on their way quickly that anything that takes up their time is competing with it. The iPhone and the iPad have effectively drilled a hole that will allow ephemeralization to flow into a lot of founders are surprised is that because they work fast, they expect everyone else to.

But none of the startup world. It was a place people went in search of something new. Bureaucrats by their nature are the exact opposite sort of people who opt out of the closet and admit, at least 3 years and probably 5. That's how it happens in books and movies, because that's why it's structured that way. Dangerous territory, that; if anything you should cultivate dissatisfaction. The main complaint of the more successful founders: The immense value of the startup hubs has: not San Francisco, Boston, Seattle. They treat iPhone apps the way they framed the question.

Notes

But core of the people who are good presenters, but its inspiration; the defining test is whether you have is so valuable that visitors should gladly register to try to ensure that they probably wouldn't even exist anymore. Starting a company just to load a problem if you'll never need to import is broader, ranging from 50 to 6,000 sestertii apiece for slaves learned in the case. Does anyone really think we're as open as one could aspire to the modern idea were proposed by Timothy Hart in 1964, two years investigating it. Actually no one is now the founder visa in a situation where they all sit waiting for the sledgehammer; if they stopped causing so much pain, it may be whether what you learn in even the flaws of big corporations found that three quarters of them.

Throw in the long tail for other kinds of menial work early in the 1980s was enabled by a central authority according to certain somewhat depressing rules many of the statistics they use the standard career paths of trustafarians to start some vaguely benevolent business.

Thanks to Tad Marko, Patrick Collison, Geoff Ralston, Sam Altman, and Mark Nitzberg for reading a previous draft.

[novaturetech]

Optimize Your Application's Performance: Expert Load Testing Services in Dubai by Novature Tech

 Introduction:

     In today's fast-paced digital landscape, application performance plays a crucial role in determining a business's success. A slow or unresponsive application can lead to a significant loss of revenue, and ultimately, a negative impact on your brand reputation. This is where load testing services come into play. At Novature Tech, we specialize in providing custom load testing solutions in Dubai, leveraging our expertise in load testing companies Dubai to ensure your applications perform optimally under heavy loads.

What is Load Testing?

Load testing is a type of performance testing that simulates a large number of users accessing an application or system simultaneously. The goal is to measure the application's performance under normal and peak loads, identify bottlenecks, and optimize it for faster response times. Load testing is an essential tool in today's digital era, as it helps you:

Ensure high availability and scalability of your application

Identify performance bottlenecks and optimize them

Improve user experience and satisfaction

Reduce the risk of downtime and data loss

Meet service level agreements (SLAs) and performance expectations

Why Choose Novature Tech for Load Testing Services in Dubai?

Novature Tech offers a range of load testing services in Dubai, tailored to meet the unique needs of your business. Our expert team of load testing specialists has extensive experience in:

Load testing companies Dubai: We understand the local market and requirements, ensuring our solutions are tailored to your needs.

Micro Focus LoadRunner: We specialize in using this industry-leading tool to create customized load testing scenarios.

K6 load testing services Dubai: Our team of experts will work closely with you to design and implement a K6 load testing strategy that suits your application's requirements.

Benefits of Choosing Novature Tech for Load Testing Services

By partnering with Novature Tech, you can expect:

Improved application performance and scalability

Enhanced user experience and satisfaction

Reduced downtime and data loss

Increased revenue through faster response times

Improved brand reputation through excellent performance

Cost-effective solutions tailored to your business needs

Conclusion:

In conclusion, load testing services are crucial in today's digital landscape, and Novature Tech is here to help. Our custom load testing solutions in Dubai, combined with our expertise in load testing companies Dubai, ensure your application performs optimally under heavy loads. Whether you're looking to improve performance, reduce downtime, or meet SLAs, our expert team is here to help. Contact us today to learn more about our load testing services in Dubai.

NOVATURE TECH

Address : 

GULFMOON TR, LLC

Building No.384,

Sharjah Industrial Area 13,

Sharjah,UAE.

For Software Testing related queries, please contact 

+91 8778006097

For HR related queries, please contact 

+91 7339039264

Email : info@novaturetech.com

Reach us : https://novaturetech.com/

K6 performance testing Dubai | K6 load testing services Dubai | K6 performance testing San Francisco

Micro focus loadrunner Dubai Expert LoadRunner testers dubai LoadRunner testing solutions dubai

[phroyd]

SAN FRANCISCO — San Francisco, long at the heart of the technology revolution, took a stand against potential abuse on Tuesday by banning the use of facial recognition software by the police and other agencies.

The action, which came in an 8-to-1 vote by the Board of Supervisors, makes San Francisco the first major American city to block a tool that many police forces are turning to in the search for both small-time criminal suspects and perpetrators of mass carnage.

The authorities used the technology to help identify the suspect in the mass shooting at an Annapolis, Md., newspaper last June. But civil liberty groups have expressed unease about the technology’s potential abuse by government amid fears that it may shove the United States in the direction of an overly oppressive surveillance state.

Aaron Peskin, the city supervisor who sponsored the bill, said that it sent a particularly strong message to the nation, coming from a city transformed by tech.

“I think part of San Francisco being the real and perceived headquarters for all things tech also comes with a responsibility for its local legislators,” Mr. Peskin said. “We have an outsize responsibility to regulate the excesses of technology precisely because they are headquartered here.”

But critics said that rather than focusing on bans, the city should find ways to craft regulations that acknowledge the usefulness of face recognition. “It is ridiculous to deny the value of this technology in securing airports and border installations,” said Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law expert at George Washington University. “It is hard to deny that there is a public safety value to this technology.”

There will be an obligatory second vote next week, but it is seen as a formality.

Similar bans are under consideration in Oakland and in Somerville, Mass., outside of Boston. In Massachusetts, a bill in the State Legislature would put a moratorium on facial recognition and other remote biometric surveillance systems. On Capitol Hill, a billintroduced last month would ban users of commercial face recognition technology from collecting and sharing data for identifying or tracking consumers without their consent, although it does not address the government’s uses of the technology.

Matt Cagle, a lawyer with the A.C.L.U. of Northern California, on Tuesday summed up the broad concerns of facial recognition: The technology, he said, “provides government with unprecedented power to track people going about their daily lives. That’s incompatible with a healthy democracy.”

The San Francisco proposal, he added, “is really forward-looking and looks to prevent the unleashing of this dangerous technology against the public.”

In one form or another, facial recognition is already being used in many American airports and big stadiums, and by a number of other police departments. The pop star Taylor Swift has reportedly incorporated the technology at one of her shows, using it to help identify stalkers.

The facial recognition fight in San Francisco is largely theoretical — the police department does not currently deploy such technology, and it is only in use at the international airport and ports that are under federal jurisdiction and are not impacted by the legislation.

Some local homeless shelters use biometric finger scans and photos to track shelter usage, said Jennifer Friedenbach, the executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness. The practice has driven undocumented residents away from the shelters, she said.

Still, it has been a particularly charged topic in a city with a rich history of incubating dissent and individual liberties, but one that has also suffered lately from high rates of property crime.

The ban prohibits city agencies from using facial recognition technology, or information gleaned from external systems that use the technology. It is part of a larger legislative package devised to govern the use of surveillance technologies in the city that requires local agencies to create policies controlling their use of these tools. There are some exemptions, including one that would give prosecutors a way out if the transparency requirements might interfere with their investigations.

Still, the San Francisco Police Officers Association, an officers’ union, said the ban would hinder their members’ efforts to investigate crime.

“Although we understand that it’s not a 100 percent accurate technology yet, it’s still evolving,” said Tony Montoya, the president of the association. “I think it has been successful in at least providing leads to criminal investigators.”

Mr. Cagle and other experts said that it was difficult to know exactly how widespread the technology was in the United States. “Basically, governments and companies have been very secretive about where it’s being used, so the public is largely in the dark about the state of play,” he said.

But Dave Maass, the senior investigative researcher at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, offered a partial list of police departments that he said used the technology, including Las Vegas, Orlando, San Jose, San Diego, New York City, Boston, Detroit and Durham, N.C.

Other users, Mr. Maass said, include the Colorado Department of Public Safety, the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office, the California Department of Justice and the Virginia State Police.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection is now using facial recognition in many airports and ports of sea entry. At airports, international travelers stand before cameras, then have their pictures matched against photos provided in their passport applications. The agency says the process complies with privacy laws, but it has still come in for criticism from the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which argues that the government, though promising travelers that they may opt out, has made it increasingly difficult to do so.

But there is a broader concern. “When you have the ability to track people in physical space, in effect everybody becomes subject to the surveillance of the government,” said Marc Rotenberg, the group’s executive director.

In the last few years, facial recognition technology has improved and spread at lightning speed, powered by the rise of cloud computing, machine learning and extremely precise digital cameras. That has meant once-unimaginable new features for users of smartphones, who may now use facial recognition to unlock their devices, and to tag and sort photos.

But some experts fear the advances are outstripping government’s ability to set guardrails to protect privacy.

Mr. Cagle and others said that a worst-case scenario already exists in China, where facial recognition is used to keep close tabs on the Uighurs, a largely Muslim minority, and is being integrated into a national digital panopticon system powered by roughly 200 million surveillance cameras.

American civil liberties advocates warn that the ability of facial surveillance to identify people at a distance, or online, without their knowledge or consent presents unique risks — threatening Americans’ ability to freely attend political protests or simply go about their business anonymously in public. Last year, Bradford L. Smith, the president of Microsoft, warned that the technology was too risky for companies to police on their own and asked Congress to oversee its use.

The battle over the technology intensified last year after two researchers published a study showing bias in some of the most popular facial surveillance systems. Called Gender Shades, the study reported that systems from IBM and Microsoft were much better at identifying the gender of white men’s faces than they were at identifying the gender of darker-skinned or female faces.

Another study this year reported similar problems with Amazon’s technology, called Rekognition. Microsoft and IBM have since said they improved their systems, while Amazon has said it updated its system since the researchers tested it and had found no differences in accuracy.

Warning that African-Americans, women and others could easily be incorrectly identified as suspects and wrongly arrested, the American Civil Liberties Union and other nonprofit groups last year called on Amazon to stop selling its technology to law enforcement.

But even with improvements in accuracy, civil rights advocates and researchers warn that, in the absence of government oversight, the technology could easily be misused to surveil immigrants or unfairly target African-Americans or low-income neighborhoods. In a recent essay, Luke Stark, a postdoctoral researcher at Microsoft Research Montreal, described facial surveillance as “the plutonium of artificial intelligence,” arguing that it should be “recognized as anathema to the health of human society, and heavily restricted as a result.”

Alvaro Bedoya, who directs Georgetown University’s Center on Privacy and Technology, said that more than 30 states allow local or state authorities, or the F.B.I., to search their driver’s license photos.

Mr. Bedoya said that these images are tantamount to being in a perpetual police lineup, as law enforcement agencies use them to check against the faces of suspected criminals. He said that the difference is that an algorithm, not a human being, is pointing to the suspect.

He also said that comprehensive regulation of the technology is sorely lacking. “This is the most pervasive and risky technology of the 21st century,” he said.

Daniel Castro, director of the Center for Data Innovation at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, is among those who opposed the idea of a ban. He said he would prefer to see face-recognition data accessible to the police only if they have secured a warrant from a judge, following guidelines the Supreme Court has set for other forms of electronic surveillance.

But proponents of the bans say they are an effort to hit the pause button and study the matter before harm is done. The proposed ban in Somerville, the Boston suburb, was sponsored by a councilor, Ben Ewen-Campen. “The government and the public don’t have a handle on what the technology is and what it will become,” he said on Tuesday.

Next door in Boston, Ed Davis, the former police commissioner, said it was “premature to be banning things.” Mr. Davis, who led the department during the Boston Marathon attack, said that no one in the United States wanted to follow the Chinese model.

But he also sees the potential. “This technology is still developing,” he said, “and as it improves, this could be the answer to a lot of problems we have about securing our communities.”

Joel Engardio, the vice president of Stop Crime SF, said that he agreed that current facial recognition technologies were flawed, but said that the city should not prohibit their use in the future, if they were improved.

“Instead of an outright ban, why not a moratorium?” Mr. Engardio asked. “Let’s keep the door open for when the technology improves. I’m not a fan of banning things when eventually it could actually be helpful.”

Kate Conger reported from San Francisco; Richard Fausset from Atlanta and Serge F. Kovaleski from New York. Reporting was also contributed by Natasha Singer and Adeel Hassan in New York.

Phroyd

[sugarmancompany-blog]

How Important Is Forensic Accounting In San Jose and Eureka

Most big corporate houses and multinational companies have a separate financial department to help them out with financial issues. However, many of the SMEs feel it to be wastage of money and steer clear of hiring financial professionals unless it becomes absolutely necessary. This is not the right kind of attitude to have though. While having a team operating in-house might prove to be a trifle expensive, it is advisable to consider hiring a small business accountant in San Francisco and Santa Rosa who can prove to be of invaluable assistance both during good times and bad times of the company.

Their expertise is certainly not limited to checking the day today expense accounts or keeping the record books up to date. On the contrary, a professional account can also offer timely advice about boosting the profits or saving money so the company does not cross over to enter the red.   Moreover, the pros can also shoulder a number of administrative responsibilities thereby leaving the owner free to pursue the actual business interests.

What can a financial accountant do for a small business?

1. Prepare Business Strategy- Every business consists of several components, no matter how small it happens to be. A qualified account is certain to help the owner come up with strategies required to achieve the objectives. The ‘key performance indicators (KPI)’ are usually set by the concerned professional and software utilized to check the results. Furthermore, the accountant also helps to troubleshoot various issues pertaining to finances and test the solutions as and when required.

2. Ensure Cash Flow- No business can hope to remain equally profitable throughout a financial year. There are sure to be highs and lows that can seriously jeopardize the operations. Many small business owners become flummoxed when they are unable to pay their vendors on account of insufficient cash flow. An accountant can help by predicting the financial situation and make efforts to find the right solution so that business is not hampered suddenly. Organizing reserves of cash is something that a business account does best along with formulating a spending plan so that there is never a shortage of money.

3. Debt Management- A small business cannot hope to profit without taking any kind of risk. However, being in debt is not the right way to ensure success. An accountant will be able to advise the client about the borrowing possibilities and help the business owner to approach the right lender so that the money is guaranteed while the interest and repayment options remain flexible. Most of the professionals can also advise their clients about refinancing as well as re-investments.

There are times when an ordinary accountant will not do. A business owner who suspects fraud or is contemplating a merger or acquisition may require the services of team experienced in forensic accounting in San Jose and Eureka as well. Investigation of financial frauds or providing expert advice during courtroom trials can be done competently by the professionals who are usually recruited for a short term in accordance with the requirement.

[tastydregs]

HyperWrite unveils breakthrough AI agent that can surf the web like a human

Join top executives in San Francisco on July 11-12, to hear how leaders are integrating and optimizing AI investments for success. Learn More

HyperWrite, a startup known for its generative AI writing extension, unveiled an experimental AI agent today that can browse the web and interact with websites much like a human user.

In a closed demonstration over Zoom, HyperWrite’s CEO Matt Shumer showed VentureBeat how the agent, accessible through the company’s Chrome extension, could navigate to the Domino’s Pizza website and begin placing an order, looking up an address and zip code to complete the transaction.

Although the demo ended before a credit card number would have been entered, Mr. Shumer said that the capability would be enabled only for select test users at first. The agent is intended to serve as a personal assistant, automatically handling basic web tasks on command.

The AI agent trend is exploding

If you follow AI on Twitter, you are already seeing the AI agent trend explode and your news feed is likely filled with references to AutoGPT and BabyAGI. These AI agents, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4 and other models, are capable of generating prompts automatically, also known as ‘self-prompting’ or ‘auto-prompting’, and can further develop and execute prompts based on an initial input, leading to the generation of new prompts.

Event

Transform 2023

Join us in San Francisco on July 11-12, where top executives will share how they have integrated and optimized AI investments for success and avoided common pitfalls.

  Register Now

Currently, applications built on the GPT API are basically limited to single-session use, meaning the model can’t recall information from previous interactions. This has to do with the amount of data, referred to as the number of “tokens,” that individual queries require, as well as GPT’s tendency to hallucinate — a problem that becomes increasingly noticeable as token counts rise.

Shumer described HyperWrite’s personal assistant agent as “the first user-friendly AI agent that can operate a browser like a human.” But experts cautioned that software exhibiting human-level web skills could also be prone to familiar human vulnerabilities like phishing, hacking or scams.

“We recognize the importance of the AI’s ability to take actions and complete tasks autonomously,” said Shumer. “However, potential concerns arise when such an AI could be misused to hack into company websites, manipulate communications, or spread spam on social media platforms. These things already happen with older technology, but it is crucial not to make these malicious activities easier for others.”

A focus on deploying AI agents safely

Shumer said his team is very focused on issues of safety. “We want to figure out the right way to do it, and that’s sort of the common theme through all this, we’re taking our time to do this the right way,” he said. “It’s about how do you deploy it in a way that actually is safe for society at large? And for the individual user? You don’t want to just [have the AI agent] going off and ordering something without your knowledge, right? You want it to be able to check with you.”

“There is precedent for responsible launches by giving people access, but with constraints to prevent disruptive activities,” he added. “Our team is arguably the best at building with and getting the most out of these models, and we’ve anticipated their potential impact for quite some time.”

Agents like AutoGPT and BabyAGI, he explained, can be thought of as simple tools that accept text input and provide output. You can integrate them into a system that adapts to new information and improves over time, and they essentially loop until they reach the desired goal. GPT, albeit powerful, is not advanced enough to be considered incredibly dangerous or AGI-like. Its real-world applications are somewhat limited; it can perform basic research tasks, but our focus lies mainly in business productivity.

“I think this is gonna blow people’s minds,” said Shumer. “People that are fully outside of tech — family members, friends who frankly barely understand what I do on a daily basis — I show this to them and their jaws just drop because it is so tangible, it’s so easy to understand how this could impact them in their daily lives. But I also want to make sure that excitement doesn’t overshadow doing it the right way.”

To try HyperWrite’s personal assistant AI agent, install the Chrome extension and request early access.

VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Discover our Briefings.

[blockgeni]

This column was written by a real person, not one of the ChatGPT or Bard artificial intelligence-based bots that have recently taken over headlines and the public's attention. Although these chat-based AIs have primarily been used for entertainment thus far, the importance of AI in daily life is expected to grow rapidly, and a worldwide conflict over the use of AI for national security purposes is already under way. The rapid adoption of these American-developed products has prompted immediate responses from China in particular. San Francisco-developed ChatGPT, for instance, became the fastest-growing consumer app in history, blazing through 100 million users two months after launch. Beijing quickly restricted access to ChatGPT and released critical videos about "how the US utilises AI to propagate disinformation" through state media. Many Chinese businesses have simultaneously improved their own conversational AI capabilities. After finishing internal testing, the "Chinese Google," Baidu, announced it would launch its Ernie Bot in March. Although a slew of smaller businesses race to promote their own solutions, Alibaba, China's leading online retailer, is also piloting its own ChatGPT-style tool. Experts are more focused on the technology's potential evil uses as the global AI race heats up and beneficial applications for the technology proliferate. Generative AI makes it relatively simple to design malware, as Check Point Software's CEO Gil Shwed highlighted: You can use a technology like ChatGPT to develop a back-office application that gathers information, then use that information to create a perfect-looking phishing email. You may accomplish all of that without having the best English writing skills or programming knowledge. ChatGPT has already been utilized in a number of cyberattacks just two months after its release. The most worrisome aspect of artificial intelligence for the West continues to be how quickly it is altering the nature of combat, even while AI-assisted malware is unquestionably disturbing. In order to increase the networked and autonomous nature of military operations and weapon systems, the Chinese military has been aggressively investing in intelligent warfare. AI has already been incorporated into the People's Republic of China's military policy, notably in autonomous vehicles, intelligence analysis, decision support, electronic warfare, and cyber operations. The fact that China is among the leaders in AI research and development and uptake for military purposes, in addition to its commanding lead in 37 out of 44 key technology fields, from defense to robotics and AI, should seriously worry Western policymakers as the gap between Beijing and Washington widens and tensions increase. In these conditions, EU and Washington must urgently increase their own investments in AI and other essential technologies. To maintain competitiveness in this crucial field, however, companies must also develop the cutting-edge digital infrastructure foundation upon which AI advancements can strive and be successfully implemented. In the European Union (EU), €1 billion has already been set aside for AI through EU programs like Horizon Europe and Digital Europe; however, the investments required to secure this crucial digital infrastructure are likely in the tens of billions, amounts that national governments are hesitant to spare given the current economic climate. The funds must be located, or else the EU risks jeopardizing its national security by falling gravely behind in the digital arena. One option put out by the European Commission would allow telecom operators to make the necessary investments in enhancing the infrastructures they manage without using up limited state finances. It would seem acceptable for Big Tech companies to pay a "fair share" of network costs since they are responsible for consuming 56 percent of all bandwidth, including Google, Meta, and Amazon. This would provide the funding required for significant security changes.

Unsurprisingly, the internet companies have opposed the concept of establishing such a system widely in Europe—and possibly the United States as well—but other nations, like France, Italy, and Spain, as well as officials at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, have overwhelmingly backed it (FCC). The EU and the U.S. may benefit in the long run from an agreement requiring the tech giants to pay their fair share of network expenses. This will lay the groundwork for technological advancement and knowledge, and, perhaps most importantly, will strengthen their readiness to face the oncoming wave of digital attacks and AI-based national security risks. Although the more traditional combat occurring in Ukraine has dominated security debate in the West over the past year, national security is much more than just tanks and fighter planes. The West needs to be ready—technologically and financially—to defend itself on that battlefield as AI becomes more complex and permeates our daily lives. Source link

[technomaster-in]

MEAN STACK FULL ONLINE LIVE COURSE IN USA

TechnoMaster provides the MEAN stack full course. You can join at your pace, your time. The real time experts will focus your career growth. We assured the 15 years of experience. Full Stack Web Developer Mean Stack course provides complete knowledge of software development and testing technologies such as JavaScript, Node.js, Angular, Docker, and Protractor. You'll build an end-to-end application, test and deploy code, and store data using MongoDB. Without wasting any more of your time, here are the best courses to learn the MEAN stack. 

[ryanrock0]

Is Industrial Design a Career with Stability?

If you are interested in industrial design, you may be concerned about the stability of the field. The stability of a career can be affected by several factors, including employment availability and income. Some individuals respond affirmatively to this question, while others respond negatively.

There are numerous entry points into the field of industrial design. You can begin as an apprentice to an established professional or study design in college before using your knowledge in the real world.

Industrial designers are responsible for developing goods and systems for manufacturing firms. Some of these things are made for aesthetic appeal, while others are built for usability and functionality. Industrial design is an excellent career option for anyone seeking a creative and diverse position.

A master's degree in industrial design can increase employment options for graduates. A master's degree also enables students to comprehend how the Design of a product influences a company's bottom line.

Industrial designers collaborate with engineers and other specialists to develop the appearance, functionality, and usability of a product. Typical responsibilities include conceptualizing produced products, formulating planning, and testing and revising designs. In addition to presenting their work to design committees, they may go to testing facilities and manufacturing sites.

Industrial designers possess a variety of abilities and may work in design studios, consulting firms, and manufacturing. Their duties include conceptualizing produced products and enhancing current ones. These experts must mix their artistic, business, and engineering skills to create aesthetically pleasing items. Utilizing software, they create three-dimensional designs and sketches for their items.

The compensation of a designer will vary based on the industry in which they work and their talents. Some employers favor applicants with expertise in graphic design or 3D modeling. Industrial designers can earn anywhere from $29,000 and $128,000 annually. Industrial designers earn a median compensation of $68,000 per year. However, your salary is contingent on your talents, experience, and education.

San Francisco is home to the highest-paid industrial designer in the United States. This city exceeds the national average by almost 20%. Other cities with greater salaries are San Jose, California, and Atkinson, Nebraska. In addition, WO Monitor wage data provides information into where graduates obtain their first jobs.

The demand for Industrial Designers is likely to increase in the next years, as the profession is expanding. Over the next 10 years, employment of industrial designers is predicted to increase by 3 percent. Between 2019 and 2028, this will generate an estimated 38,400 employment vacancies in the United States.

Industrial designers are accountable for developing things that consumers desire. They develop concepts and prototypes to present to prospective clients and manufacturers. Industrial Design is an expanding field that is anticipated to expand by 4-5% over the next decade. There will be job opportunities in a variety of industries, including the automotive, consumer electronics, and transportation sectors.

Typically, an industrial designer collaborates with engineers, researchers, and other specialists to create innovative and enhanced goods. In addition to generating prototypes, they do market research, evaluate production processes, and enhance existing products.

Industrial designers make an annual compensation of $56,000 on average. Salaries vary based on amount of education, expertise, and geographic location. Industrial Designers frequently collaborate with other designers and engineers to develop goods in an office setting. Additionally, they travel to test facilities, customer sites, and manufacturing facilities.

They often possess a bachelor's degree in design or engineering. However, an increasing number of organizations are seeking candidates with Master's degrees. A master's degree in industrial design provides an advantage in the marketplace. Industrial designers are clever, creative, and adaptable people. They may appreciate exploring new technology or the industrial process itself.

[andrera844]

Top Fastest-Growing Tech Companies in 2022

The technological world is seeing a continuous rise in the number of tech companies across the globe. Thus, innovations and new technologies are also coming into the existence almost every day. Most of these technologies and companies eventually work with one ultimate goal, improving the customer experience directly or indirectly.

Now, in such a massive race, some companies do not survive while others make a place in the list of fastest growing tech companies. In this blog, we are listing down such fastest-growing public tech companies from all over the world that have established an amazing reputation since their inception.

So, stay with us until the end of this blog to know more about these leading organizations.

1. GoDaddy

One of the fastest-growing companies in the world, GoDaddy has become a popular choice for domain and web hosting services. This one of the top public tech companies was initially founded in 1997, and currently, it is headquartered in Arizona, United States. GoDaddy statistics show that by the end of 2021, this one of the fortune's fastest-growing companies had over 20 million customers and 9,000 employees. GoDaddy also has over 60 million registered domain names and it provides services in almost every region of the world.

2. AppLovin

One of the fastest-growing tech companies, AppLovin provides developers tools that help them in monetizing, managing, advertising, and publishing their mobile apps. The startup development company was founded in 2012 and runs its operations in California. You can partner with AppLovin even if you are a mobile app development startup or an individual developer. Expert teams at this one of the fastest-growing public tech companies can help you in formulating and executing your perfect app marketing strategy.

3. Wolfpack Digital

One of the fastest-growing startups, Wolfpack Digital is headquartered in Romania. It offers top-notch quality services of app development for startups and large-scale companies at amazing rates. The startup app developers come from different backgrounds with expertise at almost every stage of the app development process. You can partner with the startup app agency to get your app designed, developed, and published across popular app stores. Since its inception, the startup development company has built digital products that attract over 4 million users per month for various industries.

4. Appinventiv

Headquartered in New York, Appinventiv is one of the fastest-growing mobile app development startups you will ever meet. The company has expertise in iOS, Android, Blockchain, IoT, AI, and plenty of other digital technologies. Its clients include various small, mid, and large-scale enterprises from all over the world. Some top clients include Dominos, IKEA, and KPMG among others. Since its inception, the company has delivered over 1000 robust digital solutions that will remain competitive for years to come.

5. Netsells

Headquartered in San Francisco, Netsells was founded in 2009. The startup app developers at Netsells have partnered with large clients such as Uber, Trainline, etc to deliver high-quality app development solutions. Currently, Netsells is known for its great reputation in over 40 countries including the US, UK, India, etc. The mobile app development startup has expertise in fulfilling business’ custom requirements by delivering competitive products at affordable prices.

6. Copper Mobile

Founded in 2010, the enterprise software development company for startups is known for building products that drive growth. The company has expertise in UI/UX designing, app development, and app testing. Be it iOS, Android, or hybrid apps, you can partner with Copper Mobile to build apps that match all security requirements of the modern digital ecosystem. On top of that, these apps will help your business in staying competitive for plenty of years.

7. Appetizer Mobile

This NY-based one of the top growing companies in the world was founded in 2009. Since its inception, the company has worked with top clients like Lady Gaga, NBA, City Jet, Epic, etc. If you need b2b app developers with expertise in iOS and Android app development, web app development, Deep Learning, Machine Learning, and many other such technologies that drive growth for your business, you can partner with Appetizer Mobile without thinking twice.

8. Active Bridge

The Arizona-based company, Active Bridge is known for helping out enterprises and entrepreneurs in onboarding digital platforms. One of the fastest-growing startups, Active Bridge can help businesses in planning perfect digital solutions for their operations. Its expert teams can help you through different stages of building an app starting with brainstorming your projects to find better app layouts to app development and maintenance.

9. Moove It

Another top name in this list of fastest-growing tech companies, Moove It has worked with plenty of brands including Unilever, Verifone, Shopify, etc. Moove It can help you through the designing and development process. For your requirements, you get a dedicated team of experts who will brainstorm and coordinate with your teams to prepare the product that users love. With expertise in modern technologies such as AI, ML, IoT, and more, Moove It can deliver top-notch quality products within competitive pricing.

10. Promatics

This startup app agency is running its operations from its headquarters in Gurugram, India. Teams at Promatics include expert UI/UX designers, web and app developers, app marketers, and more. These experts come together to build products that will boost your business’ ROIs if you partner with them. Their more than 25+ projects have generated over 8 million downloads for various organizations. The client portfolio of Promatics includes enterprises of mid, small, or large scale. In short, the organization is suitable for all sizes of businesses in terms of budgets and support.

Wrapping up

These top growing tech companies in the world that we included above are the representation of what tech companies are achieving in the 21st century. However, as there are thousands of tech companies existing across the globe, it is also a fact that plenty of deserving companies are overshadowed by their competitors due to the lack of budgets and marketing opportunities.

So, it’s not surprising if future lists of top tech companies are entirely replaced by new companies that rise into the competition among already established enterprises. Relatively, to stay updated with new names that might arise in the future, keep visiting MobileAppDaily’s Medium page for future reports.

In the end, hopefully, this blog helped you in finding a suitable answer to the question “What are the top tech companies in the world?”. For more informative blogs and reports, keep exploring MobileAppDaily’s official website.

[ceralidingbearing]

Another good thing about plastic bearings is actually

San francisco spa a Plastic Showing

A plastic bearing's energy, thermal properties, and loss of external lubrication help it become a highly attractive Bearing 316 Manufacturers In China choice for most applications. These elements are lightweight as well as durable and provide superior performance regardless of exposure to harsh chemicals. As an effect, they outperform metal bearings in lots of different settings. In this post, we'll take a new closer look at a few of these benefits of plastic bearings. If you're likely to buy plastic bearings on your next project, consider the following points to ensure your investment can be a wise investment.

Initial, plastic bearings do not require lubrication, which usually significantly increases their particular service life. Furthermore, they are corrosion-resistant, allowing you them to be employed in high-corrosion environments. In addition, plastic is a very good choice for uses that involve make contact with with drugs or perhaps food. In addition, plastic bearings are inexpensive to produce in comparison with their metal counterparts. In addition to being durable, plastic bearings will be highly corrosion-resistant and offer superior performance in a handful of applications.

Another good thing about plastic bearings is actually their ability to be able to resist corrosion, making them suited to wash-down applications. In fact, plastic bearings can even withstand exposure in order to chemicals and salt water. In inclusion to corrosion battle, they are easily portable and self-lubricating, which means they can be used in applications which are normally inaccessible to get metal bearings. These features help to make plastic bearings a good choice for numerous types of applications, not to say the environmental features they bring recommended to their users.

Despite their benefits, the biggest good thing about plastic bearings is actually their low fat. Compared to metallic bearings, they are much quieter. Metallic bearings are recognized by high disturbance and grinding distractions, which can be unacceptable in numerous applications. Because of properties, plastic bearings are advantageous in software where noise is just not an issue. Luckily they are free of permanent magnet and electrical conductivity. Which means they require a smaller amount maintenance than their particular metal counterparts.

igus conducts over 5, 000 experiments about plastic plain bearings annually. In addition, they perform a multitude of experiments on linear as well as spherical bearings using slide tables to find out their performance. In addition , they compile a data source called the "Expert System" which contains tribological data on various plastics. Their tests always grow every day as more fresh plastics are made. So, if you're interested in a plastic showing, the best place to begin is with an organization that knows just what it's doing and has a status success.

A plastic bearing can be utilized in a a number of applications, including systems, bolt linkages, and in some cases lawn and gardening equipment. They also reduce vibration and disturbance while reducing the price of metal bearings. And also, unlike metal bearings, plastic bearings will be corrosion resistant and will withstand harsh situations. That makes them an organic choice for stressful applications. You should explore the advantages of plastic bearings right now. You'll be pleased you did!