#sean lennon

[eppysboys]

John, Yoko and Baby Sean | Now and Then

[javelinbk]

Now And Then: The Last Beatles Song - isolating John’s voice

[gdmtblr]

The season moves at a quick pace.

Spring flowers are turning into early summer flowers, the leaves become deeper green, and the sunlight is getting stronger.

Now, hydrangea is blooming beautifully everywhere. And there is a lovely hydrangea in my palm as well💜(This is a tiny cupcake😉🎶🧁)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lKbb_GPlyio

[ilovedig]

Oh my god

Sean, what are you doing? Do you have any principles at all? Genuinely curious.

[underthecitysky]

Now someone ask Paul about the Carl Perkins story.

Edited to add @i-am-the-oyster ‘s point that Paul wasn’t given the original, so this really doesn’t change anything. PJ not covering all bases there. #nicetrytho

[blixtbaby]

John baking bread 1977 in The Dakota..

[erinarigby]

[pleasantlyinsincere]

"I'm sorry. I'm gonna sing a little, so I hope I don't disturb you." 😂 Short moment of Sean being in the vocal booth with Yoko during the Double Fantasy sessions.

[twixnmix]

Yoko Ono, Sean Lennon, Liz Smith, Keith Haring, Andy Warhol and André Gregory during an AIDS benefit at the Javits Center in New York City on April 29, 1986.  

[ludmilachaibemachado]

John, Yoko and Sean by Shinoyama🎍🎍🎍

Via @yoko.ono.fans on Instagram🎍

[bambi-kinos]

About Get Back/Let It Be.

Because I'm been wondering about the changed clipped and cuts from from the original. Both Estates and Paul and Ringo approved it. Do you think Paul and the rest are aware of it? And if they are, why is that? they should know by now that the fandom knows about the original clips. I don't mind the changed parts or that it made it look lighter because the way he said it, that it feels like it saved his life and that it showed his talent but he must be aware more than anyone that some parts of the fandom are saying that he is trying to re-write the history. Or maybe he really did see it they way it shown as more accurate. I mean he was there. What are you thoughts on this. I don't bring Ringo in this because I don't think he knows much + he seem to have left it behind him.

They're definitely aware of the cuts because Peter Jackson had to get approval from all four sides in order to get the documentary on D+. Apple Records is still the owner of the footage, the only thing Disney is doing afaik is licensing the footage and other Beatle products. This is to sell subscriptions to their failure of a streaming service. So I would imagine that 1) Paul and Ringo have watched all the remastered footage in full; Peter said he remastered all of it and 2) they got final say on what went into it, as well as Dhani/Olivia, and Sean Lennon as the executor of John's estate. (Yoko is no longer in the picture, the industry rumors online are saying that she is currently dying of dementia and that Sean has been fully in charge of the estate for a few years now.)

It's also important to think broadly about who the documentary is for. The number of people who are intimate with the Beatles, know the full story about their woes, the people who don't fall for Yoko's bullshit, and the people who have actually listened to the Nagra tapes, is a tiny tiny tiny TINY slice of Beatles fandom. I would even posit that this portion of the audience is only 5,000-10,000, maybe 15,000 people at best. That is a tiny slice of a global audience that numbers in the millions.

Paul and Ringo are completely safe and they know it. They know that their audience is made up of passive normies that believe everything they see without question. If you show a normie Beatle fan a picture of John and Paul gayzing at each other and tell them "these men are heterosexual" they will immediately go "of course they're heterosexual!" And they will not question it further. If you have them listen to a piece of the Nagra tapes, the normie would declare it "boring." These are the types of people who make up 95% of the Beatles global audience. Everyone on the estate side knows this very well which means they have carte blanche to do whatever they want, edit however they want, say whatever they want, and there will be zero (0) appetite to question them.

Just look at the wealth of interviews where Paul says insane shit and the journalist never ever questions him on it! It never occurs to them to question it or investigate further. This is not because they are dumb, it is simply because these people are normies. They passively accept everything they are told and there is no desire whatsoever to act any other way. They would be confused and distressed by anyone who wants to dig deeper.

Why Paul and Ringo and the estates called for certain cuts and edits is unknown and unknowable. We have no idea what they mandated, what they had Peter cut, or why. We also have no idea what Disney made Peter cut to put it on D+. Don't forget that the Beatles are not the only forces at work here. We don't know and will likely never know.

Re: your last sentence, I don't think Ringo has moved on at all. He loves the Beatles and is protective of them as a property. IMO it is more accurate to say that Ringo has grieved for the Beatles and that he let go of his survivor's guilt about the Beatles and John's murder as a part of his recovery from substance abuse. As part of that he finally integrated Beatle Ringo into Richard Starkey and now he can be fully comfortable in his skin as both. But he still loves the Beatles and still cherishes them deeply, he just doesn't get involved in the negative aspects because he's done his time with them. The cruelty, meanness and greed is what he's moved on from.

[underthecitysky]

Sean Lennon

[diebuecherdiebinn]

the real tragedy was john never getting treated for his bpd

[ringos-sexynose]

🕊️ Remembering John Winston Ono Lennon on what would have been his 82nd Birthday 🕊️

[vintagepromotions]

Poster for 'Every Man Has A Woman', a tribute album to Yoko Ono for her 50th birthday (1984). Artwork by George Corsillo.