#sure.

[greelin]

often i am saying this

[yikesb3rg]

losing my mind over kenshi's fit details so i'll put it on the backburner for nowge sorry kenshi

[theminecraftbee]

zedaph currently has a pie dish codpiece. if anyone cares. he didn’t let joe put it there for him but they considered it. if anyone cares,

[5qui99l3draws]

cringe is dead, I made a fursona

[the-hydroxian-artblog]

[soporificshoebill]

angela telling everyone to send shayne bird photos. absolutely flood his dms and socials with birds. call that a dropouttv crossover

[fallenrain40]

"aroace people can still have relationships-" NOT ALL OF THEM CAN. YOU KNOW THAT RIGHT. WHY DO YOU WORD IT AS "aroaces can still be in relationships" AND NOT "some can have relationships, and others cannot."? WHY MUST YOU INSIST THAT WE STILL CAN LOVE IN SOME WAY. WHY DOES IT MATTER. WHY SHOULD WE HAVE TO LOVE. WHY, WHEN TALKING ABOUT AROACES, DO YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO IMPLY THAT IT'S OUR OTHER WAYS OF LOVING THAT MAKES US ACCEPTABLE? WHY CAN'T THE FACT WE DON'T LOVE MAKE US GOOD PEOPLE? WHY IS THERE ALWAYS AN EMPHASIS ON THE OTHER WAYS WE LOVE, OR THE AROACES THAT CAN STILL DATE, AND NOT ON OUR LACK OF LOVE? IT FEELS TO ME, LIKE YOU ARE TRYING TO PUSH ASIDE THAT ASPECT OF OUR IDENTITY, BECUASE IT'S TOO STRANGE TO YOU. YOU MAY NOT SAY IT OUTLOUD, BUT THERE'S STILL A STIGMA AROUND LOVELESSNESS. IN YOUR MIND, YOU STILL ARE VIEWING LOVELESS PEOPLE AS LESS MORAL OR GOOD, AREN'T YOU? OTHERWISE, YOU WOULD CELEBRATE OUR LOVELESSNESS, NOT SHOVE IT ASIDE BECUASE "THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO LOVE"

[sneakupandhitya]

two of them

[diverbots]

paint 💤

[femmeconomics]

due to not being a ts blog and knowing for a fact i would lose a ts knowledge competition to this person i will simply not be responding directly but like… the disqualifiers for being a tortured poet apparently are

1. beloved — counter argument: nonconsensual ai pornography seems pretty hateful and disrespectful to me but oh well. might just be me

2. famous — counter argument: 27 club included jimi hendrix jim morrison brian jones janis joplin amy winehouse kurt cobain. beat poets? also famous. david lynch? also famous. etc.

-> 2.1 world famous — admittedly, fame in the way ts has did not exist when a lot of the examples in this post are most relevant. there was no 24 hour news cycle for many of them. the entire population didn’t carry cameras at all times. privacy did in fact exist, meaning that we were not privy to all the days that these tortured poets went about their normal lives, saw their friends, ate a good meal, bought themselves something nice. they didn’t all just spend 100% of their free time wailing in agony and trying to hang themselves.

3. white: would be a fair point about privilege except that plath thompson lynch bukowski and the founders of the beat generation are also white, and so apparently is not a disqualifier (based on this list it seems like a prerequisite, but i digress)

and then we’re just left with girl (specifically ‘girl who hasn’t killed herself yet to prove she’s really suffering’) … so okay. none of these were actually disqualifiers then. eating disorders and sexual assault and being stalked and suicidal ideation are girlwhining and melodrama, but allen ginsberg suffered soooo much for wanting to fuck little boys.

[shmorp-mcdurgen]

June 5th, 2009

Finally made it to the spot after a couple hour drive. It's odd, every single town I've gone through was either completely abandoned or flooded, as if no one even lives in this county anymore. It's very foggy today too, making it hard to see at points. The locals in this town aren't very friendly. They give me weird looks as if I'm not even supposed to be here. This is the town she was last in. I feel like someone here knows something about what happened, and I'm going to find out what. I'll ask around today, maybe I'll stay at the motel on the edge of town as I scout this place out. I'll find her here. or at least find out what happened to her.

[darkwood-sleddog]

more and more i become of the opinion my dogs are not reactive to strange dogs but in fact it is unreasonable to expect them to NOT be reactive when the dogs we pass are unwalked, understimulated rural hellions that thrash at the windows of their houses, bark at us and follow us for entire lengths of properties, snarl at us, run at us with tense body language etc.

is this because a neighbor (who does skijor!) moved in half mile down the road from us a half a year ago with the most polite, unreactive dog that my dogs glance calmly at as they walk by? as it is unrestrained (no underground fence) on the property? absolutely is.

is this because a few years ago a neighbor's very nice pitbull mix got out and when it walked up to us with polite calm body language my dogs reacted just as calm and we were able to walk this dog home? absolutely is.

like i am a human woman and have lived in areas with much larger populations than i do now. i remember being followed by strangers, yelled at by strangers in aggressive ways. it made me tense and yes...reactive in those moments to ensure my own safety and needs were met. but was it my fault for having to react that way? To call friends and family and be on the phone any time that i walked alone? to check in when i got to where i was going? to bring pepper spray and iron knuckles to walk less than 10 minutes away from home? I don't think it is. Rather it's the failure that allows that behavior towards me which is at fault. i should not have had to carry those things with me. or call a single soul.

same with my dogs. my dogs aren't reactive, i'm just the only person who walks my damn dogs in my rural neighborhood. even though we can walk for 4+ miles either way on safe dirt roads out of our driveway before we reach pavement. nobody else. walks. their. fucking. dogs. yes i manage my dogs behaviors, it can be embarrassing when they get riled up, but know what? it is not their fault so many other dogs fucking SUCK. and it is not those dogs' fault that they suck either. i encountered more politely behaved dogs when i lived in the suburbs and city than i do now because those dogs at least had some sort of experience with being around other dogs (passing them on the sidewalk even) out of necessity. Rural people truly just throw their dogs outside and expect that to be enough. if you're lucky they install a little underground fence that will maybe keep fido in the yard (like uwu WE don't want to have a look at a fence and we're going to make all our neighbors GUESS if our dog might run into the road at them uwu).

[sonicaspeed123]

If my velocity starts to make you sweat, then just don't let go

[hermithomebase]

george checking dream out while he pulls up his shirt and moans. Okay.

[ourobonez]

okay yeah whatever

[the-hydroxian-artblog]

his name is marc. it is my friend

it runs a youtube channel with 10k subscribers making zelda theory videos and compilations of cool totk/botw tricks. very opinionated and passionate about zelda but kinda wishes he could expand his reach a little bit with audiences for other games he likes