#the children’s hour 1961

[gateskeeping]

the children’s hour (1961); commissioned from @abyssalzones

[normasshearer]

FAVORITE CLASSIC FILM PERFORMANCES

SHIRLEY MACLAINE as Martha Dobie in  THE CHILDREN’S HOUR (1961) dir. William Wyler

[andruillus]

the children's hour fanart (also the winner of the drawing poll I did at my main)

[theglitterdome]

James Garner and Audrey Hepburn clowning around on the set of The Children's Hour - 1961

[celluloidrainbow]

THE CHILDREN'S HOUR (1961) dir. William Wyler Longtime friends Martha and Karen run a boarding school for girls. When an unruly child, Mary, is punished for lying, she concocts a story that Karen and Martha are having a lesbian relationship. When the story spreads, parents withdraw their children from the school. The women's lawsuit for libel hits many snags when they lack witnesses to speak for them, and all this stress adversely affects both Karen's upcoming engagement as well as her friendship with Martha. (link in title)

[mourningmaybells]

[lolapath]

… because I do love you.

I never felt that way about anybody but you…

Film: Children’s Hour (1961)

[audreyhepburninblackandwhite]

Audrey Hepburn during the premiere of The Children's Hour and after the party given for her honor by director William Wyler at the Romanoff's restaurant in Beverly Hills on 19 December 1961 Photography by Yani Begakis

[marsinthewoods]

why did i never notice that there’s a rope strewn across martha’s lap during this entire scene…

[letterboxd-loggd]

The Children's Hour (1961) William Wyler

July 2nd 2024

[saint-starflicker]

5 Dark Academia Movies That I Don't Find Too Many Other People Posting Very Frequently About

Note my definition of Dark Academia: dark because somebody dies (at a stretch, the darkness can be oppression or abuse from which no one necessarily dies but it still gets pretty dark—or if someone attempts suicide or murder then I count it as dark); academia because they go to uniform school or prepster university (the academia part can be an intense study, discussion, or research of a subject even though they are not at a campus.)

1. The Moth Diaries 2011

The book was better, more detailed, but the movie is still pretty good. The campus is peak neoclassical splendor, the uniforms are on-point aesthetic, and the darkness is gruesomely bloody and also it's on fire. The book is set during the school year of 1970 to 1971, but the movie is set in 2010 thereabouts.

2. "O" 2001

A modern retelling of Othello by William Shakespeare set at a prestigious boarding school. Adapting classical literature in a high school was trendy at the time, trying to capture the magic of Clueless 1995, and in my opinion "O" was the most glammed-up production with the most dark academia atmosphere out of all of them.

3. Educating Rita 1983

A working-class British young woman takes a social enrichment outreach education opportunity to study literature, in hopes that a study in the humanities will give her a better sense of self. Her tutor is a "failed" poet who struggles with substance addiction. Unbeknownst to them, both their lives are at the crux of change. In their consistently non-romantic conversations together, they unpack class discrimination in academia and society, as well as argue about the meaningfulness versus empty pretensions of studying humanities.

Nobody dies, well all right somebody almost dies for pretentious academic reasons...but the conversations leave a lot between the lines.

4. Private Romeo 2011

A modern retelling of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare set at an all-boys military school. Sure, it's not the Oxbridge-Camford or "Hollywood New England" collegiate aesthetic...but it is very gay, a feature that I hope lends the movie some compensatory merit in this context. Juliet's a boy. Romeo is still a boy. Nurse is a boy. Juliet's mom is a man. Paris is an abstract concept. They are studying Romeo and Juliet at the military school English class at the same time that they are living and speaking the lines in Romeo and Juliet, so it gets surreal and I recommend getting more into the emotion of it than get caught up in what the lines they're saying are supposed to mean.

This should be chaotic academia or frenzy academia, but there's homophobic hazing and bullying so I think that's pretty dark.

5. Bare: a Pop Opera ???? There was supposed to be a movie but I deduce that it's stalled in development purgatory. I have not liked a movie adaptation of a stage musical since Chicago 2002, so I guess I don't really like movie adaptations of stage musicals—but I definitely want my current hyperfixation to be more accessible than a Spotify album oh hey while waiting for this adaptation to happen you can listen to the Spotify album. It's an operetta, so it's sung-through and you won't miss out on any story dialogue unlike with other musicals. Here's my argument for B:APO being Dark Academia.

DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE #5 SPOT ON MY LIST DOES NOT EXIST...WHAT DARK ACADEMIA MOVIES DO YOU THINK SHOULD BE IN THIS SPOT IN THE MEANTIME?

I CAPSLOCK IN ANGUISH THAT THE B:APO MOVIE DOES NOT EXIST YET AND PROBABLY NEVER WILL.

YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS ARE CONSOLATION.

Honorable Mentions:

The History Boys 2006 had one subplot I was bothered by at first and then grew to despise which is really too bad because this movie had racial diversity, directly addressed misogyny in academia, and had canon gays in a love triangle — but it is dark and it doesn't really seem to know that it's dark.

The Children's Hour 1961 "dark academia is mlm while cottagecore is wlw" WRONG watching this movie to consider evidence of dark academia wlw is part of your yuri duty! remember our history!

Never Let Me Go 2010 I can't describe objectively because I read the book at a time in my life that I was having a time at that time. The movie is a faithful adaptation. I re-read it recently and I think it's more Dark Academia than I gave it credit for, but if you're not into Contemplative Dystopia then I completely understand it not being your thing.

Like Minds 2006 — Huh, so 2006 was a busy year for this genre that did not yet exist at the time. Witness the folie à deux of 21st century teenaged Templar Knight kinnies who are also homoerotic serial killers. (Waves to the people that introduced me to this movie, who—contrary to the header of this post—actually do post about it.)

Rope 1948 does have some activity that I've caught recently enough, but I thought maybe it wouldn't be considered Dark Academia right away because it doesn't take place at a school. It takes place at a dinner party where ex-schoolfriends talk to their philosophy professor who they remain well-acquainted with after graduation, an interrogation of putting this professor's morally heinous philosophy into practice. Also there is a corpse at this dinner party. There's your academics and your darkness, so there's your dark academia.

[gateskeeping]

sharing this photo with tumblr bc it’s basically audrey hepburn confirming that karen was also in love with martha

[normasshearer]

THE CHILDREN’S HOUR 1961, dir. William Wyler

[elvismentions]

The Children’s Hour (1961) dir. William Wyler

[doyke]

While this is so true and I agree with most everything in this piece, I would like to refute the claim so many critics hold that the movies function as totems for the progression of queer cinema following the hays code, one being only read as queer through subtext and the other appearing queer only a surface level without any sort of subtext whatsoever. I HAVE to ask these people how else they would have figured out how Karen was also in love with Martha.......like almost all of Karen's feelings for Martha are subtext, that's the entire point of the movie: From the outside, to those who wish it to be about rumors leading to delusion, that's what could be read through the explicit. But almost everything in Karen's diologue, in audrey's interactions with shirley, IS subtextually leading everyone else to the conclusion that this is simply a story representative of the queer experience in 1960s america. Wyler was not the guy who director fucking Ben Hur for nothing- how you could claim it seemed like this was the first time he had learned of queer people is insane. I had to say though I did like the spirit of that review. But anyways Shirley claiming they cut so much of the subtext out of the movie really proves my point. Like it was so subtextual that they actually had to remove some of the subtext because the subtext was too explicit.

[neoyan]

Shirley MacLaine & Audrey Hepburn The Children's Hour