taxonomycosmos

[taxonomycosmos]

don't know if this fully makes sense but i'm going to try: i'm not sure solipsism is the opposite of sonder because they seem to focus on entirely different aspects of experience instead of being directly opposed to on another. solipsism is the idea that only your own mind is certain to exist. it is the act of centering everything around the self. sonder, on the other hand, is about realizing that everyone around you has a life as complex and vivid as your own, which feels outwardly focused. maybe it seems like they are opposites because solipsism narrows the view to just your own perspective, while sonder widens it to include others. but in reality, if sonder is about the awareness of others' rich inner worlds, it might not directly oppose solipsism. instead, it could highlight a realization that even though you know these worlds exist, you can never fully understand or experience them. this makes sonder less about opposing solipsism and more about navigating the limits of connection and understanding. in other words, sonder and solipsism might not be opposites but different ways of dealing with what we can and can’t know. solipsism focuses on the self and doubts anything outside of it, while sonder recognizes others’ inner worlds but accepts you can never fully understand them. they both explore the limits of knowing, just in different ways.

[taxonomycosmos]

moral ambiguity and ethical ambiguity are related but distinct concepts. moral ambiguity refers to situations where the right or wrong choice is unclear because different moral principles or personal values might lead to different conclusions. for example a character in a story might steal to help someone in need and as a result they create a conflict between honesty and compassion. however. ethical ambiguity is usually within structured systems, like laws or organizational codes, where the "right" decision isn't clear due to conflicting rules or unclear guidelines. an example of this would be when a character who might be bound by something like a knight’s code has to choose between loyalty to their king and saving innocent villagers is caught in ethical ambiguity. just an interesting thing to know the different of i think, especially when writing.

[taxonomycosmos]

The idea of universality feels both big and small. It tries to cover everything, to make one idea fit everywhere, but it never really can. There are always pieces left out, parts that do not match. When something is made for everyone, it often misses the details that make things special. Yet, the pull to make things universal is strong, because it feels fair and simple. But fairness is tricky, and simplicity does not always tell the whole story. Universality tries to bring things together, but it also pushes things apart, because not everything can be the same.

[taxonomycosmos]

painful and transformative realization of these hidden forces

One's sentiments — call them that — one's fidelities are so instinctive that one hardly knows they exist: only when they are betrayed or, worse still, when one betrays them does one realize their power. — Elizabeth Bowen, The Death of the Heart

There’s this idea that our deepest loyalties and emotional commitments—what Bowen calls "fidelities"—are so ingrained in us that we’re often unaware of their existence. They operate silently, shaping our decisions and identities without needing acknowledgment. It’s only in moments of rupture, like betrayal or the act of betraying them ourselves, that their true weight and power become apparent. The word "instinctive" emphasizes how these sentiments are part of our very nature, not something we consciously construct. Bowen’s reflection points to the painful and transformative realization of these hidden forces when they are challenged, showing how much of who we are depends on what we hold sacred, even unknowingly.

[taxonomycosmos]

Memory blurs at the edges, just as we do

[taxonomycosmos]

intersecting realities

[taxonomycosmos]

so i've been thinking about how different US regions are basically walking archetypes?? like the pacific northwest is totally the hermit/mystic archetype with all its moody forests and indie coffee shops and people who just want to be left alone with their thoughts and craft beer. the southwest is giving strong warrior/explorer energy, this whole rugged independence thing mixed with constantly pushing boundaries. new england is basically the sage/elder, sitting there with its ivy leagues and historical gravitas like "well actually-" meanwhile the deep south is peak mother/preserver archetype, super focused on tradition and nurturing these long-standing cultural practices. and don't even get me started on how the midwest is literally the everyman/craftsman archetype personified - practical, hardworking, and somehow both completely normal and deeply weird about it.

[taxonomycosmos]

intersecting realities

[taxonomycosmos]

The moment you think you understand love, it transforms into something else entirely. It's like watching a city evolve - each interaction between people creates patterns that shape future interactions, yet the whole thing moves and breathes in ways no single interaction can explain. Love operates as both architect and blueprint of itself: your small acts of care shape your partner's responses which reshape your tendencies, spinning out loops that transform both people into versions of themselves that couldn't exist alone. Yet the moment we map these beautiful feedback loops and emergent behaviors, we've somehow missed love's essence - as if describing a dance by listing the positions of feet without capturing the music. This is love's fascinating paradox: it follows the most predictable patterns while remaining fundamentally unpredictable, uses the machinery of systems to create something that escapes systematic explanation entirely. It's both the most analyzed human experience and the one that most stubbornly resists analysis, leaving us with insights that feel simultaneously profound and incomplete.

[taxonomycosmos]

We built our temples out of glass and steel, crafted myths of endless ascension written in stock tickers and power ties. There's a peculiar American alchemy in believing that enough raw ambition can transmute fluorescent lights into divine fire, that enough zeroes after a number can buy transcendence. We created our own gods here - not of harvest or war, but of leverage and liquid assets. Strange how we still chase immortality, just through different rituals: morning briefings like prayer meetings, trading floors like revival tents, all of us believing in invisible forces that could lift us above our mortal constraints. The sacred and profane were never really separate; we just moved the altar to the 47th floor.

[taxonomycosmos]

ghost in someone else's memories Memory works in strange fragments...blurred edges and sharp centers, like an old Polaroid left too long in the sun. We chase nostalgia down midways and past neon signs, through crowds of strangers who become part of our story without ever knowing it. There's something about these spaces of collective joy that feels both deeply personal and completely anonymous. Maybe that's the real magic of summer afternoons spent among carnival lights and cotton candy air - how we can feel so intensely present while simultaneously becoming ghosts in someone else's memories, all of us just passing through, leaving traces of ourselves in the heat-warped air.

[taxonomycosmos]

tiny glitches in their matrix of efficiency

in those blurred spaces between intention and momentum, where the city dissolves its solid edges into streams of light and human motion, we find ourselves becoming ghosts in the machine of urban rhythm. somewhere in the electric haze between glass towers and remembered dreams, our bodies merge with the collective pulse of the metropolis, each step an unconscious participation in the grand choreography of capital's desire. yet even as we float through these spaces of flow and surveillance, our spectral forms catch the dying sun in ways they never planned for tiny glitches in their matrix of efficiency, our bodies painting light-trails of defiance against their concrete dreams 🌆✨

[taxonomycosmos]

People are always trying to figure out what is true or real, what matters and what does not, but they forget that the way we determine truth has fundamentally changed. As Foucault might argue, knowledge is not something we simply uncover but something we construct through systems of power and discourse. The internet has fractured those systems and replaced shared frameworks with endless, overlapping ones that no longer fit together neatly. It is not a straightforward search for answers because it feels more like navigating a labyrinth where every turn leads to a different version of reality. This disconnect is why larger critiques often feel scattered or incomplete. The foundations we once relied on to understand the world have become fluid and we are all trying to make sense of something that resists being pinned down.

[taxonomycosmos]

unchecked emotions overwhelm reason

All extremes of feeling are allied with madness - Virginia Woolf

There's an exploration here of how intense emotions, when pushed to their limits, can blur the lines between passion and instability. It’s interesting to consider how Woolf frames extremes not as isolated experiences but as part of a spectrum that brushes against madness. Reflecting on the deeper meaning, a theme of balance emerges, suggesting that unchecked emotions—whether love, anger, or despair—have the potential to overwhelm reason. This raises an important point about the fragility of the human psyche when pushed to its extremes, hinting at the vulnerability and chaos that lie just beneath the surface of strong feelings.

[taxonomycosmos]

One's sentiments — call them that — one's fidelities are so instinctive that one hardly knows they exist: only when they are betrayed or, worse still, when one betrays them does one realize their power. — Elizabeth Bowen, The Death of the Heart