cebomar09-blog - Tumblr blog

cebomar09-blog · 24 days ago

Text

Emerging Theory of Counseling & Psychotherapy

We appeal only to the patient's brain if we try to inculcate a truth; but if we help him to grow up to this truth in the course of his own development, we have reached his heart, and this appeal goes deeper and acts with greater force.

— C.G. Jung

This is an exploration of my emerging therapeutic approach, which is deeply rooted in philosophical, psychological, and theological foundations. At the core of my therapeutic philosophy lies the conviction that essence precedes existence, affirming each person's intrinsic worth as a divine gift from a transcendent source. This foundational belief is key as it shapes an ethic grounded in love, equality, and moral responsibility toward ourselves and others. I also recognize that humans are complex beings who operate on multiple levels, symbolically, biologically, and spiritually; therefore, my therapeutic practice emphasizes a holistic integration of mind, body, and spirit.

My approach synthesizes Nancy McWilliams’s (1999) psychoanalytic insights, highlighting the importance of exploring unconscious motivations, enhancing self-esteem, building ego resilience, managing emotional experiences, and accepting limitations, with Jungian and existential principles that prioritize agency, individuation, and authentic meaning-making. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) further enriches this synthesis by equipping clients with practical methods for identifying and challenging cognitive distortions, fostering psychological resilience, and strengthening their internal locus of control.

Aware of my biases and acknowledging my ongoing growth as a therapist, I remain committed to continuous self-reflection and openness to refinement. Ultimately, my vision for therapy transcends symptom relief, aiming instead for genuine transformation, profound integration, and holistic awareness. In alignment with Jung’s insight in the epigraph, I believe therapy achieves its deepest impact not merely by conveying intellectual truths but by facilitating clients’ organic growth toward embodied wisdom, engaging both the heart and the mind, thereby fostering authentic and lasting healing.

Philosophical & Spiritual Foundations

We all have conscious and unconscious theological and/or philosophical premises. We assume that the world is ordered in specific ways, and these assumptions lead to ways of thinking that guide our convictions and patterns of behavior. For instance, individuals who believe in an authoritarian God show heightened limbic system activity linked to fear and aggression, correlated with support for the death penalty and military spending. In contrast, those who believe in a benevolent God exhibit anterior cingulate stimulation, which is associated with empathy and is correlated with tolerance and acceptance of diverse beliefs (Newberg & Waldman, 2010). Ideas influence our brains, and the following ideas have a direct impact on human thought and behavior.

It's essential to highlight the contrast between my theory and its apparent antithesis, as understanding what something is by recognizing what it is not can provide a clearer understanding of its nature. Explicitly highlighting contrasts also helps delineate the boundaries, strengths, and potential limitations of my approach. I am positioned in direct contrast to Sartre’s claim that an individual’s existence precedes any inherent essence, as we emerge without innate purpose or identity and must define ourselves solely through our actions and decisions (Aho, 2025). In other words, each person is a self-defining being, living in a world of their own making for themselves (Olson, 1962).

However, as Sartre’s philosophy is wholly adopted alongside postmodernism, which rejects universal truths and Nietzschean perspectivism, which views truth as a social construct, it has fostered a cultural shift toward isolation and an overemphasis on personal satisfaction (Busacca & Rehfuss, 2017; Nietzsche, 2015). Nietzsche himself proclaimed that God is dead not as a literal statement about the death of a deity but as a philosophical observation about the decline of traditional religious and moral foundations in Western culture, leading to a crisis of meaning (Nietzsche, 1961). Jung, too, critiques extreme relativism, warning that severing individuals from deeper, shared structures of meaning leads to spiritual disorientation, existential angst, and detachment from objective moral frameworks and communal obligations —a trajectory mirrored in the rise of narcissism, weakened social cohesion, and diminished moral responsibility (Jung, 1933). Jung was prophetic as those issues, all of which are consistent with observable social trends, increased narcissistic tendencies, weakened social cohesion, diminished moral responsibility, and eroded interpersonal connections (Twenge et al., 2008).

In contrast to the relativist views outlined above, I endorse Thomas Aquinas’s perspective that our inherent essence precedes our existence. Unlike the relativist emphasis on radical self-definition, Aquinas’s framework provides a foundation for meaning, moral responsibility, and social cohesion, fostering greater personal and societal well-being. For Aquinas, God, from which our essence comes, is ipsum esse subsistens—the ground of Being (Aquinas, 1265–1274/2018). When individuals see themselves not as isolated, self-defining entities but as part of the foundation of all reality whose nature is love, they cultivate stronger relationships, deeper meaning, and greater life satisfaction. Empirical research supports that religious individuals who perceive themselves as part of something greater tend to enjoy higher levels of well-being, mental and physical health, and social connectedness (Koenig, 2012). As I consider my own bias, I realize that what we and our clients need most of all is a balanced perspective. Any idea, element, vice, or virtue can go too far, and the balance of opposites is the beginning of homeostasis.

Having established my philosophical and spiritual orientation, I now address how these principles shape my therapeutic practice. By affirming our embeddedness in relationships, meaning, and a transcendent moral order, therapy fosters genuine growth, resilience, and transformation rather than merely managing symptoms. The following section outlines key therapeutic principles, including increasing client agency, integrating unconscious material, and facilitating authentic meaning-making.

Key Principles of Therapy

By synthesizing analytical (Jungian) psychology, Frankl’s logotherapy, CBT, mindfulness, and somatic awareness, I aim to empower clients to cultivate agency, lead meaningful lives, and develop an internal locus of control. The therapist's role is not to lead clients passively through challenges but to serve as a knowledgeable and compassionate guide who illuminates pathways toward self-discovery and healing—much like Virgil, who skillfully guides Dante through the complexities of the Inferno, enabling him not only to navigate the darkness but also to gain wisdom and transformation through the journey (Alighieri, 2006).

Client Agency and Locus of Control

I believe that fostering an internal locus of control is essential for empowering clients’ agency and helping them recognize their ability to influence their experiences, rather than viewing themselves as passive recipients of external forces (Rotter, 1966). Nancy McWilliams (1999) also notes that clients seek therapy not just to mask symptoms but to reclaim mastery over their lives. This process begins when a counselor recognizes that each client carries within them the seeds of their own healing. By guiding clients to acknowledge and grieve unrealizable desires, it frees psychological energy to pursue realistic, self-directed goals (McWilliams, 1999).

Unfortunately, our zeitgeist often fosters and even promotes an external locus of control, facilitating an endless pursuit of safety and avoidance of discomfort. The story of Sleeping Beauty illustrates this well: by keeping her in a perpetual safe space, her parents left her unprepared for the realities of life. When she inevitably encountered adversity, she fell into a deep sleep, symbolizing her lack of resilience and powerlessness to help herself. Although folk wisdom advises, “Prepare the child for the road, not the road for the child,” overreliance on “safe spaces” and labeling microaggressions does more harm than good. Often, what triggers someone is not the real problem, but rather a sign of unresolved wounds that need healing. McWilliams (1999) cautions, “It can be a malignant kind of projection to assume that because one is experiencing certain affects, the person inducing them is (consciously or unconsciously) intending that reaction” (p. 107).

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) explicitly and effectively targets cognitive distortions, including emotional reasoning, catastrophizing, overgeneralizing, dichotomous thinking, labeling, negative filtering, discounting positives, and blaming (Leahy et al., 2011; Butler et al., 2006). Our culture and sociopolitical discourse are increasingly normalizing these distortions through shifts toward radical individualism, relativism, and uncritical acceptance of subjective feelings as objective truths. While these tendencies are most visible in certain progressive ideologies, conservative frameworks are not immune; philosophical commitments to rigid traditionalism, idealized notions of a fixed moral order, and resistance to ambiguity or complexity can also reinforce distorted thinking. In both cases, foundational beliefs—whether grounded in individualism or an inflexible metaphysical certainty—can contribute to a cognitive environment in which nuance is lost and polarization thrives. By encouraging clients to evaluate their emotional responses rather than reflexively validating or suppressing them, CBT bolsters psychological resilience, emotional balance, and a robust internal locus of control, empowering them to confront life's inherent difficulties and enhancing their agency.

Moreover, McWilliams’s (1999) emphasis on ego strength and self-cohesion is a core aspect of my emerging framework. Recognizing that self-esteem can unravel in the face of unexpected criticism, the therapist’s role includes modeling imperfection—acknowledging fallibility to show that self-regard can coexist with human flaws—and fostering an atmosphere where even shame-colored experiences are explored as part of the human condition rather than catastrophic failures. These elements ultimately strengthen clients' ability to confront internal conflicts and develop a unified sense of self (McWilliams, 1999).

I also hold a therapeutic disposition of going slowly and avoiding assumptions before diving into the deep waters of the unconscious. Drawing on McWilliams’s caution against attacking clients’ defenses head-on, I begin at the surface, addressing the immediate concerns or coping styles before guiding clients to uncover deeper material. This stance resonates with Jung’s method of gradually integrating repressed shadow material before dialoging with the anima/animus (Jung & Franz, 1964). It ensures the therapist and client build trust and rapport before venturing into more vulnerable territory. McWilliams shares a case in which a client’s suicide kit gave him a feeling of ultimate control and autonomy (McWilliams, 1999), highlighting why we should not be quick to strip away protective defenses.

Meaning-making

Nietzsche famously said, “A man who has a why to live for can bear with any how” (Frankl, 1966). Mental health is not about being happy, for happiness is a transient emotion. It is the meaning in our lives that truly sustains us, even in concentration camps. Frankl's Logotherapy emphasizes that meaning can be discovered in three primary ways: creating something valuable, encountering someone or something meaningful, and adopting a resilient attitude toward unavoidable suffering (Frankl, 1966).

This core principle is supported by research indicating that approximately 40% of our happiness stems from intentional choices, while the remaining 60% is influenced by factors beyond our immediate control (Waldinger & Schulz, 2023). Furthermore, the concept of a “happiness set-point”—the stable level to which we revert following emotional extremes—aligns with opponent-process theory (after every emotion, we come back to baseline), reinforcing the inadequacy of happiness as a singular life goal (Mineka & Kihlstrom, 1978; Solomon & Corbit, 1974). Thus, my therapeutic approach does not merely chase ephemeral happiness. Instead, following McWilliams (1999), I emphasize awareness of what cannot be changed and focus on the 40% within our control toward enduring growth, purpose, and fulfillment.

As noted earlier, therapy should focus on enhancing clients' ego strength, self-cohesion, and resilience (McWilliams, 1999). Many individuals face psychological difficulties due to a fragmented sense of self and a disjointed understanding of meaning, which can help them navigate life's inevitable challenges. Therefore, creating meaning serves as a remedy for psychological disintegration. Frankl (1966) argues explicitly against pursuing a "tensionless state" (p. 105), instead urging us toward actively striving for worthwhile, meaningful goals and willingly accepting life's inherent struggles—what Dostoevsky poignantly described as the fear of "not being worthy of one's sufferings" (Frankl, 1966, p. 66).

Christ, as the quintessential embodiment of an internal locus of control and the ultimate archetypal symbol of wholeness for Jung, showed us that voluntarily carrying our cross, as it were, is essential to a fulfilling life and a balanced psyche (Jung, 2010). That archetypal pattern is an axiomatic truth embedded in reality. Just as physical growth requires tension—microtears in muscle fibers, for instance, produce greater strength—psychological growth demands a similar willingness to confront discomfort. Therapists are like architects strengthening a fragile structure by carefully increasing its load; they should embrace creating constructive tension in therapy, gently guiding clients toward deeper meaning and resilience.

Jung & Yoga: A Holistic Approach to Healing

I do not seek to be only a clinician. My role is as an advocate for social change and a counterforce to cultural factors that can perpetuate psychological distress. Beyond the cultural elements discussed earlier, two pervasive schisms remain: one between mind and body and another between ancient wisdom and modern scientific thought. My emerging therapeutic modality endeavors to repair these ruptures, in part, by merging Jungian principles with Yogic psychosomatic philosophy.

Both analytical psychology and Yoga affirm that humans are not singular, static entities. While our ego tends to fix our identity as “I, me, and my,” we are, in truth, a dynamic interplay of conscious and unconscious forces. Jungians locate this dynamism in archetypal material, such as the shadow, complexes, and the collective unconscious (Jung & Franz, 1964); yoga describes it through multiple koshas, or layers of physical and spiritual existence. Jung’s concepts of the ego and the Self closely mirror the yogic notions of Asmita—the constructed sense of self around which we orbit—and Ātman—the deeper, unified wholeness akin to the imago Dei, respectively. In essence, Jung’s individuation and Yoga’s very name (from the Sanskrit yuj, “to unite”) both emphasize integrating these disparate parts into a cohesive whole (Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 2015; Stone, 2008).

This integration process demands an encounter with what is hidden, suppressed, or feared within us. As Jung notes, "No tree can grow to Heaven unless its roots reach down to Hell" (Jung, 1969, as cited in Peterson, 2018, p. 180). Just as psychological growth requires confronting our unconscious darkness, the shadow, so does Yoga engage this reality. At the end of a Yoga session, we practice Savasana (the corpse pose)—a physical surrender, a symbolic death before renewal. In both traditions, descent precedes ascent; we can only move toward wholeness and transformation by acknowledging and integrating what lies beneath the surface. This archetypal pattern is powerfully embodied in Christ, whom Jung regards as the ultimate symbol of the Self, the archetype of wholeness. The harrowing of hell—a pivotal descent between death and resurrection—illustrates that to reclaim wholeness, one must first journey into the depths.

Jung asserts that “the body means little to us without the psyche, as the latter does without the body” (Jung, 1933, p. 75). Critically, a Yogic lens also highlights the body’s importance, offering practices, such as postures (asanas), breathwork, and mindful awareness, that release tension, create physical space in the body for emotional processing, and cultivate a clearer, more compassionate self-understanding. Mindfulness, in particular, has been empirically demonstrated to reduce stress and improve emotional regulation (Robins et al., 2012). Rather than treating mind and body as separate, Yoga asserts their inextricable connection—not only to each other but also to nature’s broader rhythms, as seen in Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine, which regard individuals as microcosms of the macrocosm (Lad, 1984; Beinfield & Korngold, 1992) When woven together, these approaches encourage clients to recognize the mental grooves, or samskaras, shaping their patterns of behavior; by consciously engaging with these impressions—whether we call them complexes or samskaras—clients exercise greater agency over their emotional and physical states.

Ultimately, blending Jungian and Yogic perspectives, whose efficacy is well documented (Keller et al., 2002; Cramer et al., 2018), supports the broader goals I have already outlined: deepening insight into unconscious motivations, fostering emotional resilience and self-cohesion, and guiding clients toward a lived experience of wholeness by validating the realities of both mind and body while bridging ancient wisdom with contemporary knowledge. Yoga views healing as an ethical action, and this integration offers a potent path toward healing not only the individual but, through ripple effects, the communities and systems in which we live.

Conclusion and Looking to the Future

Therapy is a profound responsibility that demands both skill and self-awareness. As I refine my emerging therapeutic framework, I recognize that it is shaped by a unique blend of influences: analytical psychology, existential philosophy, CBT principles, and holistic practices like Yoga, while also reflecting on my own cultural, spiritual, and personal biases. To ensure a genuinely client-centered ethical approach, I must remain vigilant about how these influences manifest in practice.

Further grounding my orientation are the objectives McWilliams (1999) highlights—insight development, increased agency, enhanced emotional awareness, ego strength, and self-cohesion—which inform my goal of guiding clients toward an internal locus of control. I demonstrate to them the effectiveness of “taking up their cross” and transforming challenges into catalysts for growth, aligning with Frankl’s (1966) emphasis on finding meaning over fleeting happiness. At its core, therapy is a dialogue between the conscious and the unconscious—between the executive function of the ego and the deeper, unseen forces that shape us. True healing requires engaging with suffering, integrating our repressed parts, and discovering a purpose that transcends mere emotion. In keeping with Jung’s view that individuation involves acknowledging all facets of ourselves and echoing McWilliams’s (1999) recognition that we must accept what cannot be changed, therapeutic growth becomes a process of reconciling polarities and embracing the responsibilities of living, ultimately guiding clients to explore deeper purpose, resilience, and authenticity in their lives.

Given the weight of such a responsibility, I commit myself to two core values: consistent self-care and humility. My emerging theory of counseling incorporates clear biases and firm dispositions. I emphasize an inherent worth given to us by a divine creator; I am weary of extreme ideology and have a relatively unique blend of ideas and lived experiences. Therefore, I understand that many of my clients may not view the world in the same way I do, and it would be unethical and negligent to attempt to sway them in my direction. I will avoid this pitfall at all costs as I work through countertransference and other challenges in my personal therapy.

While this paper represents my current understanding, my framework will continue to evolve as I gain experience, engage in self-reflection, and remain open to new insights. Moving forward, several key questions remain. One ongoing consideration is how different theoretical frameworks—psychoanalysis, existentialism, cognitive-behavioral approaches, and holistic traditions—can be more seamlessly integrated to provide a richer, more adaptable therapeutic model. Another important question is how spirituality can be incorporated ethically into therapy, particularly given my comfort with interfaith dialogue. Additionally, I must continuously examine how to balance compassion and boundaries, ensuring that empathy does not become enabling or rescuing. Beyond these immediate concerns, I wonder what other disciplines, such as neuroscience, anthropology, or comparative mythology, can further enrich my therapeutic approach and deepen my understanding of the human experience.

Although I may not tell my clients explicitly, I believe that in this work, I am not merely dealing with neurosis, pathology, or mental health issues; I am coming face-to-face with people’s souls. As an advocate, I confront hidden, malevolent forces and help the world heal. As I use the word “I” here, I remember that the self-gratifying ego can often get in the way. I intend to wake up each morning with the attitude that it is not I who is healing the client. I am helping them come in contact with a perennial source of wholeness within themselves to which they have ready access; they might just need help remembering the way back to it.

References

Aho, K. (2025). Existentialism. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2025 Edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existentialism/

Alighieri, D. (2006). The divine comedy (R. Kirkpatrick, Ed.; R. Kirkpatrick, Trans.). Penguin Publishing Group.

Aquinas, T. (1265-1274/2018). Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Coyote Canyon Press (I,q.4,a.2).

Beinfield, H., & Korngold, E. (1992). Between Heaven and Earth: A Guide to Chinese Medicine. Random House Publishing Group.

Busacca, L. A., & Rehfuss, M. C. (Eds.). (2017). Postmodern Career Counseling: A Handbook of Culture, Context, and Cases. American Counseling Association.

Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 17–31.

Cramer, H., Anheyer, D., & Saha, F. J. (2018). Yoga for posttraumatic stress disorder–a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 18(72), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1650-x

Jung, C. G. (1933). Modern Man in Search of a Soul (W.S. Dell & C.F. Baynes, Trans.). Harcourt, Inc.

Jung, C. G. (2010). Answer to Job: (From Vol. 11 of the Collected Works of C. G. Jung) (R. F.C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G., & Franz, M.-L. v. (1964). Man and His Symbols (C. G. Jung & M.-L. v. Franz, Eds.). Random House Publishing Group.

Keller, W., Westhoff, G., Dilg, R., Rohner, R., Studt, H. H., & the Study Group on Empirical Psychotherapy Research in Analytical Psychology. (2002). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness aspects of outpatient (Jungian) psychoanalysis and psychotherapy—A catamnestic study. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber & M. Target (Eds.), Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment (pp. 186–197). Philadelphia, PA: Whurr.

Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 1-33. https://doi-org.ctproxy.palni.edu/10.5402/2012/278730

Lad, V. (1984). Ayurveda: The Science of Self-healing: A Practical Guide. Lotus Press.

Leahy, R. L., Holland, S. J., & McGinn, L. K. (2011). Treatment Plans and Interventions for Depression and Anxiety Disorders. Guilford Publications.

McWilliams, N. (1999). Psychoanalytic Case Formulation. Guilford Publications.

Mineka, S., Suomi, S. J., & DeLizio, R. (1981). Multiple separations in adolescent monkeys: An opponent-process interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(1), 56-85. https://doi-org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1037/0096-3445.110.1.56

Newberg, A. B., & Waldman, M. R. (2010). How God Changes Your Brain: Breakthrough Findings from a Leading Neuroscientist. Random House Publishing Group.

Nietszche, F. (1961). Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and No One. Penguin Classics.

Nietzsche, F. (2015). Human, All Too Human and Beyond Good and Evil. Wordsworth Editions.

Olson, R. G. (1962). An Introduction to Existentialism. Dover Publications, Inc.

Peterson, J. B. (2018). 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos (N. Doidge, Ed.). Random House of Canada.

Robins, C. J., Keng, S. L., Ekblad, A. G., & Brantley, J. G. (2012). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on emotional experience and expression: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20857

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28.

Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974). An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81(2), 119-145.

Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2015). Counseling and Psychotherapy Theories in Context and Practice, with Video Resource Center: Skills, Strategies, and Techniques. Wiley.

Stone, M. (2008). The Inner Tradition of Yoga: A Guide to Yoga Philosophy for the Contemporary Practitioner. Shambhala.

Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, K. W., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos Inflating Over Time: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 875–902. https://doi-org.ctproxy.palni.edu/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00507.x

Waldinger, R., & Schulz, M. (2023). The Good Life: Lessons from the World's Longest Scientific Study of Happiness. Simon & Schuster.

#classical literature #psychology #jungian psychology #therapy #psychotherapy #mental health #yoga #science #philosophy #theology

1 note · View note

cebomar09-blog · 5 months ago

Text

The Spirit Of Ideas, The Death of God, and the Crisis of Truth

"In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes." -Judges 21:25

The same idea can lead one group to justify the enslavement of people based on the color of their skin just as effectively as it can spark an abolitionist movement. Take the grand narrative (universal truth) of Imago Dei—the idea that all of us were made in the image of God. You can use that to say that everyone is equal no matter what. One can also say, “Everyone is made in the image of God and therefore equal, except you people.”

An additional illustration is the social constructionism put forth by Michel Foucault and his peers in 1970s France. This concept posits that ethics, morality, identity, knowledge, and social norms are shaped by historical and cultural contexts rather than being inherent or universal truths. Foucault, Derrida, and Sartre signed a petition supporting the decriminalization of consensual relationships between minors and adults…

If each person’s individual truth is considered The Truth, who are we to deny them?

Conversely, Derrida’s relativism possesses a certain brilliance, making it quite suitable for career counseling and other areas of counseling. The postmodern constructivist perspective encourages individuals to reflect on the various factors that have shaped their current life circumstances, offering them the possibility of escaping a fixed narrative. This approach fosters insights far more effectively than a generic method, especially in an age when people can no longer depend on predefined identities or linear career paths.

The point I aim to drive home is that ideas, their development, and how we use them matter. Philosophy, theology, and the social sciences aren’t simply a matter of people having abstract discussions for the fun of it. The discourse of ideas shapes humanity, and if you’re reading this, you have a worldview that affects you and everyone around you.

The Spirit of Ideas

Nietzsche begins Beyond Good and Evil by critiquing philosophers by pointing to their arrogance. They lack the humility, he says, to admit that their ideas come, in large part, by way of their own psychophysiological societal constitution. “...the greater part of the conscious thinking of a philosopher is secretly influenced by his instinct and forced into definite channels.”

Nietzsche seemed to understand that ideas are not formed in isolation; rather, they are like seeds that carry the imprint of the environment in which they were conceived. Just as DNA encodes the blueprint for a living organism, ideas are shaped by the psychological, cultural, and social forces that give birth to them. These forces—what might be called the spirit behind an idea—guide its development and influence the direction it takes in the world.

Additionally, Nietzsche prophetically lamented what would happen when grand narratives collapse, leaving humanity in a state of moral and existential disarray. As the death of God looms over modernity, we see ideologies emerge that seek to fill the void. The rest of this post will showcase examples of important ideas that started as seeds, the soil in which they flourished, and the fruits they produced.

Example 1—From Karl Marx to Soviet Russia and Mao Zedong: Communist Atrocities and the Influence of Postmodern Neo-Marxism in Today’s Discourse

Karl Marx had an obsession with destruction that was not solely intellectual; it carried a psychological weight. His works often reveal profound disdain for his surroundings, a fixation on chaos, and a compelling urge to witness the downfall of established institutions. This sense of negation is intertwined with his personal life—his estrangement from family, inability to find personal stability, and a disordered lifestyle mirror the decay and turmoil he sought to inflict on society. Considering Nietzsche’s view that philosophers' ideas stem from their personal instincts and experiences, Marx’s preoccupation with destruction, rebellion, and dark imagery becomes particularly telling.

Dr. Paul Kengor, author of The Devil and Karl Marx (2020), notes that Marx was fixated on Faustian themes and Hell, despite his declared atheism. He famously stated, “Thus Heaven I’ve forfeited, I know it full well... My soul, once true to God, is chosen for Hell.” For those unfamiliar, Karl Marx, along with Friedrich Engels, profoundly influenced modern communist ideology, laying the groundwork for many 20th-century communist movements, including those responsible for over 100 million deaths. No other ideology in history has caused such widespread loss of innocent life. Marx also advocated for the dissolution of the nuclear family and encouraged ruthless scrutiny of everything—ABSOLUTELY everything. The Communist Manifesto explicitly calls for a violent overthrow of the current state of affairs, including private property, capital, the family unit (yes, the family unit), and entire societies. He glorified destruction.

I encourage you to look into the terrifyingly strong positive correlation between dark triad (now tetrad) personality traits and left-wing authoritarianism.

What about the origins of this spirit of destruction?

These ideas originated from a deeply unclean man who led a chaotic, financially unstable life, constantly borrowing money and failing to repay his debts. Marx exploited his parents' generosity and was widely disliked, even by his partner, Engels. He refused to bathe, and his squalid living conditions reflected a deeper disorder that manifested in his revolutionary vision. Marx’s life embodied his ideas—marked by disarray, dependency, and self-inflicted misery. Just as he sought to abolish the social order, he rejected personal responsibility and hygiene, living in perpetual financial and physical distress.

He suffered from carbuncles, which were at their worst while he was writing Das Kapital (his magnum opus), a lengthy and painful read (I’ve tried). His carbuncles on his privates were particularly severe during the writing process, sometimes triggering fits of rage. In a letter to Engels (co-author of The Communist Manifesto), he noted a boil between his upper lip and nose, stating, “It's as if the devil has been hurling shit at me.” It is not unreasonable to suggest that Marx’s bodily suffering found expression in his work—his pain, both physical and psychological, sought relief through the destruction of the societal body. His boils, which tormented him as he wrote his magnum opus, can be seen as a metaphor for his ideas themselves: festering, painful, and ultimately destructive.

Karl Marx’s perspective views consciousness as a collective social phenomenon heavily influenced, if not determined, by material, particularly economic, conditions. He argues that societal superstructures, especially economic and religious ones, manipulate the working class (proletariat) to benefit the ruling class (bourgeoisie). He wasn’t entirely mistaken. History indicates that religion can indeed perpetuate oppression, as seen in the papal states' influence over politics, the harshness of the Inquisition, and the collaboration between religious institutions and colonial powers. However, to limit human history solely to class struggle while neglecting the positive aspects of the subjects he criticized oversimplifies the intricate nature of human experience. I think this quote from The Communist Manifesto sums it up: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle.” History, for Marx, is defined by conflicts between classes with opposing interests, and the mode of production in any given society determines its social structures and relationships. That’s it. It’s all about power.

If that sounds familiar in today’s discourse, it should. The dominant view of universities, which has so thickly seeped into every nook and cranny of sociopolitical life, has become an adaptation of this same Marxist framework—only now, class struggle has been refashioned into an endless struggle of identity categories. There are the privileged people and the oppressed people, and they are demarcated primarily by race, gender, and sexual preference. If you are a member of the oppressed class, you are de facto morally superior to your oppressors. Some people go as far as to suggest that being wealthy or white means you must be morally corrupt. And if you happen to be a wealthy straight white male, well…

What I’ve just described is often referred to today as postmodern neo-marxism. It denies the existence of universal truths and grand narratives while paradoxically operating religiously (wink) under its own rigid, unquestionable dogmas. But some ideas seem to eat themselves alive like a snake. This intellectual ouroboros fuels a cycle where every institution, relationship, and belief is viewed through the lens of power dynamics, often leaving little room for nuance, complexity, or alternative interpretations. Ironically, while striving to break down hierarchies and absolute truths, these ideologies establish new, rigid orthodoxies that replicate—yet corrupt—the systems they aim to dismantle. This creates a continuous cycle where skepticism becomes self-destructive, eroding the very foundations it relies on. Consequently, we find ourselves in a culture dominated by deconstruction, which allows scant opportunity for genuine reconstruction.

In the end, Marx’s philosophy of destruction did not arise from an objective analysis of history but from the chaotic, festering spirit of his own life. His call for revolution was not just theoretical—it was deeply personal.

Example 2—John Money, Alfred Kinsey, And The Spirit Of Hate And Deception

John Money

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Ideas do not emerge ex nihilo. Their existence embodies the essence of those who conceive them—molded by personal experiences, trauma, biases, and disturbing motivations. This was evident in Marxism, and it holds true in the work of John Money.

Money’s childhood in rural New Zealand was marked by early failures, anxieties, trauma, and personal tragedies. He was thin and delicate, raised in a home of strict religiosity, or what he would later call “tightly sealed, evangelical religious dogma.” He had a terrible relationship with his father. Many decades later, he wrote about his father, describing him as a brutal and heartless man who gave an “abusive interrogation and whipping” to his four-year-old son over a broken window. Money famously indicated that this event contributed to his enduring rejection of “the brutality of manhood.” After his father’s death, he wrote, “My father died without my being able to forget or forgive his unfair cruelty.”

Money was thereafter raised in a strongly feminist atmosphere, shaped by his mother and single aunts, whose critical attitudes towards men had a profound effect on him. “I suffered from the guilt of being male,” he wrote. “I wore the mark of man’s vile sexuality”—referring to penis and testicles. Considering Money’s forthcoming notoriety in adult and infant gender reassignment, his subsequent remark carries a disturbing tone. “I wondered if the world might really be a better place for women if not only farm animals but human males also were gelded at birth.”

Fifteen years after starting at Johns Hopkins University, he became known as the individual who introduced the term "gender identity" to describe a person’s internal sense of being male or female. He was also recognized as the foremost expert on the psychological effects of ambiguous genitalia and garnered international attention for establishing the pioneering Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic (presently known as the Center for Transgender and Gender Expansive Health).

I’ll provide some direct quotes and tidbits from Money.

"If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or twelve who's intensely attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, and the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way," he told the journal, and added, "It’s very important once a relationship has been established on such positive and affectionate grounds that it should not be broken up precipitously."

In 1987, Money wrote a foreword to a work published in Denmark entitled Boys on Their Contacts with Men: A Study of Sexually Expressed Friendships by Dutch professor Theo Sandfort. The book presented what purported to be verbatim testimonials of boys as young as eleven years old describing the delights of sex with men as old as sixty. "For those born and educated after the year 2000," Money wrote, "we will be their history, and they will be mystified by our self-imposed moralistic ignorance of the principles of sexual development in childhood."

A childhood sexual experience," he explained to Time magazine in April 1980, "such as being the partner of a relative or an older person, need not necessarily affect the child adversely."

He granted an interview to Paidika, a Dutch journal of pedophilia, which carries ads for the North American Man-Boy Love Association and other pro-pedophile groups.

Under Money’s influence, the Johns Hopkins Medical School curriculum in 1971 featured explicit photographs of people engaged in bestiality, urine-drinking, feces-eating, and various amputation fetishes in order to desensitize medical students to sexual perversions.

During a lecture in Winnipeg, Money screened a stag film of five women and three men having group sex, then followed the screening with a speech in which he informed the assembled professors and first-year medical students that marriage was simply an economic compact in which the “heart follows the wallet”; that incest should not be prosecuted as a criminal offense; and that in cases where stepfathers sleep with their stepdaughters, the mother is often “happy” because she “is glad to have [her husband] off her back.”

[W]hat happens in our culture?" he wrote. "Children's sex explorations are treated like a contagious disease... [D]on't let them see the incontrovertible differences in their genitals, and don't, at all costs, let them rehearse copulation—the one universal human activity that still imperatively demands that the two sexes behave differently and harmoniously!"

In an interview with the pornographic magazine Genesis in April 1977, Money vented his frustration against the prohibition against childhood sexual rehearsal play and a psychologist's right to observe it. “The number of studies of the effects of depriving human infants and juveniles of sexual rehearsal play is exactly and precisely zero,” he said, “because anyone who tried to conduct such a study would risk imprisonment for contributing to the delinquency of minors, or for being obscene. Just imagine the headlines and the fate of a research-grant application requesting funds to watch children playing fucking games!”

Note: Information about Money is sourced from As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised As A Girl (2000) by John Colapinto.

His influence on the fields of gender studies and human sexuality extends far beyond the walls of Johns Hopkins University, where, like a seed planted in fertile soil, his ideas have taken root and flourished, influencing generations of scholars, clinicians, policymakers, and the political landscape of modern discourse. Many of his students and proteges, educated in his theories of psychosexual differentiation, have risen to prominent roles at some of the nation's most esteemed universities, research institutions, and scientific journals. Among his former students are Dr. Anke Ehrhardt, a senior professor at Columbia University; Dr. Richard Green, director of the Gender Identity Clinic in London; Dr. June Reinisch, who led the renowned Kinsey Institute (remember that name) for many years; and Dr. Mark Schwartz, director of the influential Masters and Johnson Clinic.

The spirit of his ideas, born from personal turmoil, radical ideology, and an explicit disdain for men, continues to shape policies, academic curricula, and society's perceptions of gender and sexuality. However, John Money was not an anomaly. He was part of a larger intellectual movement determined to dismantle long-standing notions of sexuality and morality under the pretense of scientific inquiry. To grasp the full extent of this ideological shift, we must also consider another influential figure whose impact parallels Money's—Alfred Kinsey. If Money’s theories sowed the seeds of gender fluidity, Kinsey’s work laid the groundwork for the sexual revolution itself. Like Money, Kinsey's research did not arise ex nihilo; it bore the unmistakable mark of his personal obsessions and biases, which continue to reverberate through academia and public policy today.

Alfred Kinsey

Alfred Kinsey's work on human sexuality was deeply influenced by his personal history and upbringing. Born in Hoboken, New Jersey, in 1894, Kinsey grew up under the watchful eye of his father, a strict Christian disciplinarian who saw Sundays as sacred and tightly regulated his family's activities. Conversations about sexuality were virtually non-existent in his household, leaving Kinsey grappling with feelings of repression well into adulthood. In fact, by the time he met his future wife in 1920, he had never been on a date or engaged in sexual intercourse—a striking testament to his sheltered upbringing.

Kinsey’s early years were further complicated by a series of health challenges, including rickets, rheumatic fever, and typhoid fever, conditions that left him physically frail. The combination of his father's rigid expectations and his own physical vulnerabilities may have fueled a deep-seated desire to push boundaries and challenge societal norms. His fascination with biology and the natural world provided an escape, offering him a lens through which to explore life beyond the rigid confines of his upbringing. Eventually, this scientific curiosity led him to one of the most controversial and influential fields of study: human sexuality.

Initially trained as an entomologist, Kinsey’s career took an unexpected turn when he founded the Institute for Sex Research at Indiana University in 1947.

Kinsey’s personal experiences with repression, combined with his relentless pursuit of scientific understanding, fueled his advocacy for a more nuanced and inclusive perspective on human sexuality. His work not only ignited academic discourse but also played a pivotal role in reshaping societal attitudes, paving the way for modern discussions about sexual fluidity and orientation. Whether hailed as a visionary or criticized for his methods, Kinsey undeniably left an indelible mark on the study of human sexuality.

The Kinsey Scale and Its Influence

Kinsey's most famous contribution is the Kinsey Scale, introduced in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948). The scale ranges from 0 (exclusively heterosexual) to 6 (exclusively homosexual), with intermediate numbers reflecting varying degrees of bisexuality. This scale critiques the binary perception of sexual orientation, framing sexuality as a spectrum.

The Kinsey Scale is frequently used by LGBTQ+ advocates to highlight that sexuality isn't limited to fixed categories but exists along a spectrum. It provides a flexible framework for individuals to explore their sexual orientation, and it is often referenced in educational materials and awareness campaigns aimed at promoting acceptance of sexual diversity. Kinsey’s research significantly contributed to the concept of sexual fluidity, challenging the notion of static sexual identities. His work has been vital in LGBTQ+ advocacy, normalizing various orientations and addressing societal taboos. Much of Kinsey’s foundational work has paved the way for marginalized individuals, fostering a sense of welcome and inclusion in society.

Let’s take a look at how he conducted his research, which was cited positively multiple times during my time at IUPUI from 2020-2024. What you’re about to read is deeply disturbing.

In Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (which was reprinted in 1998 and is widely available), the Institute published the notorious Table 34, which documents the sexual responses of children from infants through teens. They conducted sexual experiments on hundreds of children by bringing them to what the experimenters called “orgasm”, timing these responses with a stopwatch.

Kinsey proudly asserted, “We have now reported observation on such specifically sexual activities as erection, pelvic thrusts, and several other characteristics of true orgasm in a list of 317 pre-adolescent boys ranging between infants of five months and adolescence in age.” Table 34 in Kinsey’s book includes an 11-month-old baby who had an alleged “orgasm” ten times in one hour; a four-year-old child and a 13-year-old boy experienced 26 such alleged “orgasms” in a 24-hour period.

For more information, visit: https://familywatch.org/fwi/Kinsey_fraud.cfm & https://stopthekinseyinstitute.org/

John Money and Alfred Kinsey's work illustrates how humans tend to develop new moral frameworks when traditional ones are lacking. Nietzsche's famous words — “God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. Yet his shadow still looms” — effectively captures the contemporary challenge of replacing objective morality with constructs rooted in science and society. As Kinsey explored the complexities of sexuality and Money aimed to redefine gender, society began to forge new sacred values to fill the emptiness left by diminishing traditional values.

The fundamental ideas promoted by John Money and Alfred Kinsey have had far-reaching societal outcomes. On one hand, their work played a pivotal role in advancing discussions around sexual identity and gender expression. Kinsey's research, in particular, helped to destigmatize non-heteronormative sexual orientations. His findings contributed to a gradual shift in public perception, paving the way for advancements such as the legalization of same-sex marriage and broader LGBTQ+ rights movements. Similarly, Money's introduction of the term "gender identity" laid the groundwork for the recognition of transgender individuals and the development of legal protections and healthcare policies aimed at supporting gender-diverse populations.

However, their work has also led to controversial and unintended consequences. Increasingly, gender-related concerns in individuals are being addressed through medical interventions rather than social or psychological support, resulting in a significant rise in treatments for minors, such as puberty blockers, hormone therapies, and surgeries. Rather than affirming the inherent connection between mind and body and reinforcing the intrinsic value of one's biological identity, these ideas have contributed to the erosion of parental rights—as seen in many cases in Canada—and the destabilization of the nuclear family. This has raised serious concerns about the long-term social and psychological implications of their theories.

While Kinsey and Money influenced important social progress, their legacy remains a complex and polarizing one—challenging society to continually navigate the balance between evolving scientific understandings and the stability of long-standing moral frameworks.

Did the spirit of their ideas require child sacrifice in order to flourish? Was that worth future social progress? I’ll let you decide.

Final Thoughts

Nietzsche’s haunting question— “What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent?”— rings louder today than ever. The collapse of grand narratives and universal truths has left society in a frantic search for meaning, replacing once-sacred values with new ideological constructs. But what drives these constructs forward? The spirit of an idea, much like a seed, carries the imprint of its origin—its cultural, psychological, and historical context—shaping the trajectory of thought and action in ways both profound and perilous.

Ideas, as we have seen, are never neutral; they are infused with the desires, biases, and struggles of those who conceive them. The spirit behind an idea influences whether it will build or destroy, liberate or oppress. In the absence of universal guiding principles, we find ourselves in a landscape where ideas are constantly deconstructed but seldom reconstructed with wisdom and foresight.

As we strive to redefine morality, identity, and social order, we must ask: Are we creating a coherent framework that fosters human flourishing, or are we trapped in an endless cycle of ideological reinvention? True balance requires both order and chaos—an acknowledgment that while ideas must evolve, they should not detach entirely from the timeless truths that anchor our humanity.

In the end, the spirit of an idea shapes not just the world but the soul and psyche of those who embrace it. The challenge is not merely to invent new values but to discern which spirits we allow to guide us forward, for better or worse.

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits.

Matthew 7:15-16

#Philosophy #Nietzsche #Marxism #Postmodernism #Critical Theory #Moral Philosophy #Social Commentary #Cultural Critique #Identity Politics #Gender Theory #Societal Decay #Karl Marx #John Money #Alfred Kinsey

5 notes · View notes

cebomar09-blog · 5 months ago

Text

Dante's Inferno Reimagined

Dante's Inferno Reimagined is a project I wrote almost two years ago during my undergraduate studies. At the time, I was drawn to Dante Alighieri's Inferno, fascinated by his ability to blend theology, personal experience, and cultural critique into a seamless narrative. Like Dante, who filled his Hell with the figures of his time—politicians, poets, and religious leaders—I used my own cultural lens to populate a modern version of his nine circles. Looking back now, I realize how much my perspective has shifted; if I were to rewrite it today, the choices would be different.

Dante’s Inferno is more than just a medieval vision of Hell; it's a deeply personal exploration of exile, longing, and the search for meaning in suffering. Exiled from Florence, Dante wrote with the weight of his experiences shaping his depiction of sin and divine justice. The concept of contrapasso—where punishment mirrors the sin—serves as both a moral reckoning and a reflection of his own struggles with betrayal, power, and redemption. The structure of his work, with its intricate use of terza rima and symbolic imagery, invites readers into a journey that is both external and internal, forcing them to confront their own moral contradictions.

When I first wrote this project, I wanted to capture that essence—Dante’s relentless pursuit of order amidst chaos, his blending of satire with sincerity. I infused modern themes with a similar lens, attempting to reflect the contradictions and moral tensions of our time. In hindsight, I see that my selections were shaped by who I was then, by the ideas that felt most urgent and pressing.

Enjoy: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gam3Sod5n2HTrTNfcASnoK61NaM8jSaS/view?usp=sharing

#dante #dante alighieri #classical literature #contrapasso #divine comedy #poetry

3 notes · View notes

cebomar09-blog · 5 months ago

Text

A Universal Perspective: Exploring Reality through Interconnectedness & Sacrifice

This post illustrates the layered, fractal nature of reality described in the preface, showing how truths can span temporal dimensions and intertwine with coexisting realities.

I believe our ethical and moral decisions are rooted in ontological and metaphysical assumptions—whether we acknowledge them or not. Even if you don’t consider yourself “religious,” you still navigate life based on what you trust to be true about reality. Ultimately, our understanding of matter, perception, and our place in the world shapes both our lives and dispositions.

Science, psychology, and religion approach the same fundamental questions from different angles, and by integrating these perspectives, we gain a deeper understanding of reality and our role within it. While we may never fully grasp the universe, our pursuit of transcendent Meaning sustains us, often unconsciously. A fulfilling life and better society stem from self-discovery (body and mind), but we must also heed ancient wisdom. Being open to change, letting go, and making sacrifices are equally vital. This discussion will touch on Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, physics, and Christianity, aiming to highlight two fundamental truths: (1) interconnectedness and (2) sacrifice as essential to it. Exploring these truths has enriched my life, and I believe it can help others, too.

I'll start with an easy question...

What is God?

I believe St. Thomas Aquinas answers this question best: Ipsum Esse Subsistens—God is the very ground of Being itself (not a fantastical deity in the sky). Unlike everything else in existence, which is contingent upon other things and events for its existence, God alone is Being in its purest form. In Aquinas’ view, all created things have a distinction between their essence (what they are) and their existence (that they are). A tree, for example, has an essence—its treeness—but its existence depends on factors outside itself. God, however, is the only being in whom essence and existence are identical; His very nature is to exist; God is a noun and a verb.

This understanding of God as a subsistent being itself means that God is not merely another entity within the universe; He is not a being amongst beings (God is fully unique) but rather the necessary foundation upon which all existence rests. Everything that exists does so by participation in God's being. Without God, nothing could exist at all, for He is the uncaused cause, the source from which all reality derives.

Aquinas’ formulation provides a profound answer to the question of God's nature—transcending anthropomorphic conceptions and instead presenting God as the ultimate, self-sustaining reality, the necessary being whose existence is not contingent but absolute. Thus, to speak of God is to speak of the very act of existence itself, the sustaining force that upholds all things in being.

Side Note: In another post, The Spirit of Ideas and the Death of God, I aim to address the risks associated with the belief that existence precedes essence. This discussion will cover the troubling views of certain postmodern French philosophers who reject all objective truths.

I’ve mentioned the terms “reality,” “universe,” and “order.” To clarify, I believe that in some respects, these could substitute for the word God, but that would only be part of what God is. Perhaps the early founders of religious traditions didn’t simply invent everything; instead, they articulated the universe's order based on their experiences, using the language and understanding of their era. The idea of interconnectedness is present in many traditions, and within this fundamental truth lies the need for sacrifice. I will begin by discussing interconnectedness and then illustrate how it connects to sacrifice.

When multiple domains of inquiry and exploration observe the same phenomenon or concept, it suggests they are highlighting something real - at least in some context - and significant.

Conceptions of the Order of the Universe

Hinduism’s Ultimate Reality

Let’s begin with the Hindu concept of an interconnected reality. In Hinduism, the ultimate reality or divine essence is known as Brahman. It's frequently misinterpreted as a polytheistic religion. Brahman is the origin from which everything emerges and to which all things ultimately return, including the various deities. This ultimate reality is often characterized as infinite, transcendent, and immanent. Hindu beliefs also state that we possess individual, unique souls called Atman, which are expressions of Brahman.

A quote from the Upanishads, one of the sacred scriptures of Hinduism, says that Brahman is the life of all creatures...the universe comes forth from Brahman and will return to Brahman. Verily, all is Brahman (Taittiriya Upanishad 3.1).

To better understand Brahman, imagine the ocean. Every wave is unique, rising and falling at specific times and places. Yet, each wave is still part of the vast ocean—it emerges from the ocean and eventually returns to it. Similarly, we, along with everything around us, are like waves: unique in our individuality but inherently connected to the greater Brahman, or divine ocean, from which we came and to which we will ultimately return.

Buddhism’s Metaphysics

The idea of Śūnyatā in Buddhism, commonly interpreted as 'emptiness' or 'voidness,' signifies not nothingness but the realization that all entities rely on one another for their existence. No object possesses a distinct identity independent of others.

The Heart Sutra, a prominent Mahayana text, states: "Form is emptiness, emptiness is form." Essentially, this means that everything originates from a multitude of elements that shape our perception of an object (Remember the law of contingency referenced by Aquinas).

A tree is not just a tree. It is roots, nutrients, bark, and branches. It is protons, electrons, neutrons, and atoms. Sunyata would ask: When you take a drink of water, can you tell me at what point that water becomes you? Can you point to the exact spot where your nose becomes your cheeks? Sunyata would say that we are living in a dynamic, fluid soup of atoms. There is not an actual disconnect in space from me to you, despite our perception.

Taoism and Another Christian (those darn Christians)

Taoism represents a philosophical and religious tradition that originated in China, with the term Tao (pronounced "Dow") often translated as "way" or "path." The Tao signifies the natural order of the universe and embodies the indescribable, ever-unfolding flow of reality. It is considered the ultimate principle that underlies all phenomena and occurrences in the world, serving as the source, pattern, and essence of all that exists.

The Tao Te Ching, one of Taoism's foundational texts, begins with the famous assertion: "The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao." This statement suggests that the true nature of the Tao is inherently beyond human comprehension and cannot be fully captured in words.

This concept evokes a reflection by St. Augustine, who cautions against the constraints of human understanding regarding the divine. In one of his sermons, he asserts, "Si comprehendis, non est Deus," meaning, "If you comprehend it, it is not God." Augustine underscores that the true essence of God surpasses human intellect and language; any image of God that we can understand inevitably diminishes the divine mystery. Just as the Tao escapes precise definition, Augustine similarly asserts that God's essence lies beyond complete human comprehension—every time we believe we fully grasp the divine, we ultimately fail to do so.

Both Taoism and Augustine’s theological insights converge on the profound realization that the ultimate reality—whether understood as the Tao or God—remains beyond the confines of human expression and intellectual limitation. This shared humility before the ineffable serves as a reminder that true wisdom often begins with the acknowledgment of our own limitations in understanding the profound mysteries of existence.

Apparently, Science Agrees with Buddhism

From a scientific perspective, The First Law of Thermodynamics—The Law Of Conservation Of Energy—states that matter cannot be created or destroyed; it simply changes form. Consider water transforming into ice or steam. All matter exists within a continuous cycle of transformation, highlighting the fundamental interconnectedness of all things. For matter to change form, something must often perish to allow new life to emerge. This concept will resonate later when discussing the Christian Eucharist.

Consider a simple daily example: when you eat an apple, it doesn’t vanish into thin air. Instead, your body breaks it down, absorbs its nutrients, and converts it into energy. The apple’s matter changes form, becoming part of you. As you breathe, sweat, or shed skin cells, some of that matter is released back into the environment—potentially nourishing the soil that may one day support another apple tree. This ongoing cycle perfectly illustrates the law of energy conservation and the profound interconnectedness of all life.

These concepts balance both rational and transcendent elements and suggest a unity or a shared essence that goes beyond our individual identities and perceptions. This universal truth not only underscores the unity of existence but also sets the stage for our next topic: the integral role of sacrifice.

Why does this even matter? And, How do we come to know and interact with this interconnected God?

There came a time when I began to reflect deeply on interconnectedness. Prior to that, I struggled with my inability to let go of certain feelings. I harbored bitterness towards the world for not providing what I believed I was entitled to. I felt like I deserved something that was being withheld from me, and I held tightly to that belief.

Then various events occurred that began to open my eyes, including COVID and Kobe Bryant’s passing. I came to understand that I possess a single life, which could end at any time, and that all my actions and thoughts impact my existence as well as those around me. I began to view myself not as a solitary individual but as part of something much larger. Rather than being a lonely island, I saw myself as a wave within the ocean.

Realizing this, I began to let go of certain things to grow and transform into a new person. In essence, I underwent a death and rebirth. I started to give up time, pleasure, and negative beliefs about my identity. However, I soon understood that this process needs to be ongoing. It is a daily choice to declare, “Thy will be done, not mine.” As I started to seek an understanding of the universe's order and the importance of sacrifice, everything began to align because I acted with more honesty.

Applying Sacrifice in Everyday Life: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

I’m expanding on the apple analogy, but instead of discussing nutrients entering and transforming the body, I’m focusing on the evolution of thoughts, behaviors, and individuals.

We often face uncomfortable yet necessary tasks in life.

While exercise may be painful at times, we recognize its long-term benefits.

We let go of enjoyable yet harmful habits to improve ourselves (no need for specific examples).

In the case of volunteering, while sacrificing time and resources to assist others might not yield immediate rewards, it can foster a sense of fulfillment, enhance community well-being, and lead to new opportunities.

Meditation and prayer, which demand discipline, time, and patience, can also result in lasting advantages such as reduced stress, better mental clarity, and a more profound sense of peace. By relinquishing specific thoughts, narratives, or patterns, we create space for psychological development, much like a snake shedding its skin.

Thus, the idea of sacrifice—whether viewed as a religious practice, psychological development, or biological need—highlights the deep interconnectedness of life. Each action, every instance of letting go, each sacrifice, and the shedding of old skins for new beginnings, contributes significantly to the intricate tapestry of existence.

Logos and Sacrifice in Christian Theology

Christian theology is fundamentally rooted in sacrifice. Throughout his life, Jesus embodied this virtue, renouncing comfort, time, and energy—culminating in the ultimate sacrifice of his own life for a revolutionary message of love, a love without discrimination.

In the Bible, the Greek term Logos is often translated as “Word,” but it signifies much more than mere speech. It represents a divine, organizing principle of the cosmos—order, reason, and logic. The opening verse of John's Gospel declares: "In the beginning was the Word (Logos), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." (John 1:1). Here, Logos is not just a reference to the spoken word; it encapsulates the foundational structure through which creation unfolded and life was imparted to humanity.

At its core, Logos reflects the universal order that demands sacrifice. Jesus Christ, as the embodiment of the Logos, brings this abstract principle into tangible reality. His life and teachings unveil the mechanics of existence, offering a glimpse into the nature of God the Father—the ultimate source from which all things originate and to which all things return. His journey illustrates an enduring truth woven into the fabric of reality: for new life to emerge, something must be relinquished, something must come to an end. This principle is echoed across religious traditions, reflected in the laws of physics, and felt deeply within human consciousness.

By embracing a life of self-sacrificial love and service, we engage with the Logos in a profound way. In following Christ’s example, we affirm our interconnectedness with all creation and the divine, deepening our understanding of the cosmic order that binds everything together.

The Divine Logic of Sacrifice: Order, Interconnection, and Renewal

In Christian liturgy, the ritual of the Eucharist (Communion) is a profound acknowledgment of our participation in the Logos—the inherent order of the universe that necessitates death and rebirth for growth and renewal. From the soil to the worshippers’ hands in the sanctuary, a continuous chain of sacrifices unfolds, with each element surrendering itself to nourish and sustain the next. This sacred process ultimately culminates in the creation of the bread used in the ritual, reflecting the universal truth that life is sustained through transformation and self-giving.

The journey begins with the soil, which surrenders its nutrients and micro-organisms to nourish the seed. This silent act of giving allows the seed to awaken, sacrificing its dormancy to sprout—a death of its former state and a rebirth into something new.

Rain and sunlight, seemingly tireless in their offering, pour forth their energy in a continual act of selflessness, giving of themselves to sustain the growing seed. Their sacrifice fuels growth, reflecting the fundamental principle that energy must be relinquished to sustain life.

Upon maturity, the wheat faces its inevitable end at harvest. The kernels, separated and ground into flour, undergo yet another transformation—a necessary sacrifice that allows their essence to continue in a new form.

In the bakery, flour encounters another metamorphosis. Exposed to heat and combined with other elements, it loses its raw identity, only to be reborn as bread, ready to offer nourishment and sustain life.

In the Eucharist, this bread takes on a sacred role, embodying Christ—who represents the ultimate sacrifice, giving His life for the salvation of many. Partaking in the bread is an intimate act of participation in this divine order, symbolizing an acceptance of the cycle of sacrifice and renewal that governs all existence.

Finally, as the bread is consumed, it surrenders once more, becoming part of the body, offering energy and sustenance. Each step in this journey illustrates the immutable cosmic law: for life to flourish, something must be relinquished.

Thus, the Eucharist is more than a ritual; it is a reflection of the intricate cycle of life, death, and rebirth that defines our existence. Engaging in this sacred act is an acknowledgment of our interconnected role in the cosmos—an embrace of the reality that sacrifice is not destruction but transformation.

Jesus, the Christ, the Logos, personifies this interconnectedness with His command, "Love thy neighbor." In this command, we find a profound truth: Love others as yourself, for they are extensions of you; they are you. This realization affirms our unity with one another and with the divine order that governs all things.

Conclusion: The Rational Order of Sacrifice and Interconnectedness

Throughout this exploration, we've seen how diverse traditions—Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, and even modern science—converge on a fundamental truth: the universe operates within a rational and ordered structure that demands sacrifice for renewal and interconnectedness for growth. This pattern is not arbitrary; it is woven into the fabric of existence, reflecting a cosmic logic that governs everything from the smallest seed to the grandest theological concepts.

The Eucharist serves as a poignant microcosm of this reality, encapsulating the necessity of transformation and self-giving. Just as the seed must surrender to the soil and the wheat to the fire, we, too, are called to relinquish aspects of ourselves—our comfort, desires, and illusions of separateness—to participate in the greater whole. Sacrifice, then, is not a loss but a necessary passage into new life, a constant reordering that aligns us with the divine structure of the cosmos.

St. Thomas Aquinas' concept of Ipsum Esse Subsistens—God as the very ground of Being—further supports this rational order. If God is existence itself, then all things find their source and purpose in Him, participating in the divine reality through continuous transformation. This understanding challenges us to view our lives not as isolated events but as integral parts of an ongoing divine narrative where every relinquishment contributes to a higher order.

By embracing this truth, we come to understand that our personal sacrifices—whether they involve letting go of resentment, investing in personal growth, or serving others—are not in vain. They are, in fact, the necessary steps toward unity with the greater whole, reinforcing the intrinsic interconnectedness of all things. In living sacrificially, we align with the Logos, the divine order that binds the cosmos together, and move closer to the transcendent Meaning that sustains us.

Ultimately, whether through theological reflection, scientific inquiry, or personal experience, the message remains clear: life flourishes through sacrifice, and our fulfillment lies in recognizing our unity with all creation. It is in this recognition that we discover the profound logic behind existence—one that invites us to engage fully, let go courageously, and love deeply.

The Three Butterflies

The people of this world are like the three butterflies

in front of a candle's flame.

The first one went closer and said:

I know about love.

The second one touched the flame

lightly with his wings and said:

I know how love's fire can burn.

The third one threw himself into the heart of the flame

and was consumed. He alone knows what true love is.

― Attar of Nishapur

#philosophy #psychology #religion #theology #christianity #interfaith dialogue

3 notes · View notes

cebomar09-blog · 5 months ago

Text

Beyond Belief: Pragmatism and Conversion in Spiritual Experience

#philosophy #pragmatism #research #psychology #religion #theology

2 notes · View notes

cebomar09-blog · 5 months ago

Text

Depression and Insight

Sometimes, you might find yourself standing perfectly still, frozen in place, while the clock ticks relentlessly forward. Minutes blur into hours. You scroll endlessly, researching movies—watching trailers, reading reviews—yet each choice feels like a weight too heavy to bear.

You don’t watch a movie.

Even choosing what to eat is an ordeal. Your eyes trace the menu over and over, each word dissolving into meaninglessness.

You don't eat.

The unread books, once alive with promise, now stare back in silent accusation, their spines unbroken, their pages untouched.

Everything is grayscale—grayscale thoughts, grayscale days, grayscale nights. The grayness of January creeps in, settles in your bones, and lingers, matching the monotony of your mind.

Social interaction becomes unbearable. Solitude, intolerable.

Perhaps anger becomes your companion. Perhaps it’s the one emotion that feels real, the only thing that stirs a sense of being alive. And it doesn’t linger in anhedonic foreplay. It seizes control, forcing itself forward with relentless intensity. And all you can do is watch.

Maybe, instead of anger, it's the obsessive rumination. That thing you hate about yourself, or that thing you did or said that you can't let go of. It's a total eclipse of the mind. And it reels and reels and reels until it brings you to your knees.

On the one hand, life may seem “fine” from the outside. You’re alive, breathing, functioning. Maybe you’re in school, working, or fulfilling responsibilities—and doing well by all external measures. Going through the motions.

But on the other hand, the bleakness remains. Rationale doesn’t apply here. All the well-meaning advice—“Just do X, and you’ll feel better”—feels useless. Toss it aside.

Depression doesn’t always come suddenly; sometimes, it creeps in slowly, like watching the sun sink below the horizon. You see it coming, don’t you? The way it settles in, gradual and inevitable. You don’t stare directly; you glance, you look away, but when you turn back, it’s too late. The darkness has swallowed you whole. And now, it feels like forever. The belief that this is the new reality—that it will last forever—is the most dangerous part. It’s the helplessness that so often leads to the end. It’s the silent question, “Why wouldn’t I?” that lingers dangerously close, yet paradoxically serving as the very thread that keeps everything from unraveling.

Then there’s the slow spiral of daily life into entropy. You sleep eleven hours and awake exhausted. It’s easy to imagine lying in bed all day, drifting in and out of sleep if you allowed yourself to. Eating habits change; hunger doesn’t come at the usual times. And exercise—once a simple part of life—becomes a struggle. But when you manage it, it’s one of the few things that offers relief. Perhaps a loyal companion, like a dog or your cat, becomes the other.

It can feel like hiking an endless mountain trail, a heavy pack strapped tightly to your back. Inside it is the pain of generations—passed down like an unwanted inheritance. A child must be taught how to carry it. With every step, the burden presses deeper into your shoulders, legs growing weaker with each mile. Eventually, you collapse onto the cold ground, the pack settling silently beside you. For a moment, you can sit. For a moment, relief. The cold night surrounds you. You feel the weight. But at least, for now, you rest.

And yet, despite it all, you still get back up. You feel your feet on the ground. You feel your heavy arms. You hear your breath. You still search for a way forward, even if you don’t know what that looks like yet. Perhaps that’s enough.

From Psalm 77

1 I cry aloud to God,

aloud to God, that he may hear me.

2 In the day of my trouble I seek the Lord;

in the night my hand is stretched out without wearying;

my soul refuses to be comforted.

3 I think of God, and I moan;

I meditate, and my spirit faints. Selah

4 You keep my eyelids from closing;

I am so troubled that I cannot speak.

5 I consider the days of old

and remember the years of long ago.

6 I commune with my heart in the night;

I meditate and search my spirit:

7 “Will the Lord spurn forever

and never again be favorable?

8 Has his steadfast love ceased forever?

Are his promises at an end for all time?

9 Has God forgotten to be gracious?

Has he in anger shut up his compassion?” Selah

10 And I say, “It is my grief

that the right hand of the Most High has changed.”

Emotions and mental states, even depression, are there to teach us something.

The Drama of the Gifted Child: A Personal Reflection

Alice Miller's The Drama of the Gifted Child is a crucial work beneficial to therapists, parents, and adult children alike. Every individual is a child whose parents, in their unique ways, could not entirely fulfill their needs, just as their parents before them. This reflection explores this central theme and how, as a therapist, I plan to navigate this complexity within myself while working with clients. I, like many others, am an individual whose parents, owing to their own unresolved conflicts, were sometimes unable to meet my fundamental requirements for affection unencumbered by painful expectations. I was unconsciously attuned to the needs of my parents, both of whom emerged from emotionally and/or physically abusive families. Having developed patterns that led them to seek love through maladaptive behaviors, they consequently imposed upon me the obligation to fulfill their unmet emotional needs. After all, who else other than individuals who have cultivated a remarkable capacity to perceive and respond to people’s emotional needs would possess the interest and energy to devote entire days to introspective relationships that delve deeply into the consciousness of others?

Note: Before moving on, it is important to point out that one's family dynamics are not necessarily the sole or primary cause of depression. It is often one of many.

The Disturbance

Some bird species, like the cuckoo, lay their eggs in the nests of unwitting host birds. The host mother bird, driven by instinct, nurtures the intruder chick, even as it grows disproportionately larger and drains her resources. Like the host bird, we may unknowingly carry unmet needs into relationships and environments that are not naturally equipped to fulfill them. When we lack unconditional love as children, we often seek it in places ill-suited to meet our deepest needs—whether through unhealthy relationships, compulsive achievements, or self-harming behaviors. In so doing, we may deplete ourselves or others, caught in a cycle of longing and unfulfillment, unaware that the love we seek should have first been nurtured within our home nest. In other words, when we are deprived of something we didn’t get in childhood, we will seek subsequent means in order to retrieve what we were not given (Miller, 1997, pp. 2-3). The repressed emotional conflict that leads us to this seeking contributes significantly to the development of complexes, defenses, and unhealthy attachment patterns.

This message was both helpful and difficult for me to hear. Growing up, I often sensed that my worth was measured by my talents and achievements, while the deeper aspects of who I was—my emotions, vulnerabilities, and intrinsic self—were sometimes overlooked both by myself and my parents. This led to a need for external validation to feel whole, as I often felt misunderstood. As an adult, many of my defenses surface most saliently in romantic relationships and have an egocentric and self-deprecating character. These often manifest as the need to control, perfectionism, self-criticism, or a heightened sensitivity to feeling misunderstood. A relationship is like a mirror. You get to see where you really are, what you're really like because your actions directly affect the person closest to you. If your partner can accept you as you are (all of you), and you them, that's where the magic happens.

As a therapist these patterns could manifest in a variety of ways. With a heightened sensitivity to feeling misunderstood, I may become overly attuned to whether a client “gets” me or appreciates my insights. This could trigger feelings of self-doubt or frustration, leading to emotional withdrawal or over-explaining. I may unconsciously seek validation from clients by trying to be the “perfect” therapist, which can create unnecessary pressure on the therapeutic process. To temper these patterns, a high degree of self-awareness and regularly checking whether my responses are grounded in the client’s needs—rather than my need to feel understood—will be important.

Depression, Grandiosity, and Insight

Alice Miller illuminated a profound truth that resonates deeply with me, simultaneously instilling both fear and comfort. She outlines two typical reactions from children whose needs remain unmet: grandiosity and depression. Those who exhibit grandiosity strive for achievement and external validation as a way to mask the lack of unconditional love, holding onto the fantasy that they can still win parental approval. In contrast, individuals leaning towards depression internalize fears and self-doubt, becoming fixated on the risk of abandonment while constantly seeking reassurance (Miller, 1997, pp. 65-66). Both responses obstruct genuine self-awareness by preventing individuals from fully recognizing the emotional deprivation they experienced in childhood. I identify characteristics of both within myself, with a greater inclination toward depressive tendencies. However, the most enlightening takeaway from Miller's work is her assertion that "Neither can accept the truth that this loss or absence of love has already happened in the past and that no effort whatsoever can change this fact" (Miller, 1997, p. 66).

I cried when I read that passage. There is profound relief in knowing that the damage has already been done—that I cannot be abandoned in the same way again. Understanding my parents' past helps me see how this pattern was set in motion: my mother was abandoned and emotionally abused in her childhood, and my father, too, was abused by his alcoholic father while his timid, fearful mother could provide no protection. I will never again be neglected in the midst of two parents who despised each other. I will never again be the helpless subject of a painful and traumatizing custody battle. I do not have to carry forward the fear of abandonment into my relationship, assuming my lover will leave me despite clear signs of stability and commitment. Alice Miller captures this struggle well: "Without realizing the past is constantly determining their present actions, they avoid learning anything about their history. They continue to live in their repressed childhood situation, ignoring the fact that it no longer exists. They are continuing to fear and avoid dangers that, although once real, have not been real for a long time" (Miller, 1997, p. 2).

Conclusion

While I am consciously aware that I no longer need a scapegoat, the healing of childhood wounds is a continual process—one that demands patience, self-awareness, and a dedication to growth. It is crucial to identify and manage any unconscious transference patterns that may arise in my practice as I progress in my role as a therapist. If left unchecked, these patterns can subtly impact my relationships with clients, complicating the maintenance of clear therapeutic boundaries and impartiality.

Through persistent self-reflection, supervision, and personal therapy, I can transform these vulnerabilities into strengths. My painful experiences can then serve as a source of empathy and understanding, allowing me to connect more deeply with my clients; the very wounds that once clouded my sense of self can become tools for fostering healing in others. Ultimately, pursuing self-awareness and self-compassion will benefit my clients and allow me to stand more firmly in my authenticity. In doing so, I can create a therapeutic space rooted in genuine presence—one that encourages clients to embark on their journeys of self-discovery and healing.

My role as a therapist is, in large part, a result of the suffering I encountered in childhood—because who else? I do not blame my parents for my forming painful patterns of depression, self-criticism, self-destructive behavior, and the persistent feeling that I am not good enough. Instead, I recognize the intergenerational transmission of pain that people cannot help but pass on to their children when they do not encounter the help necessary to end such cycles. That is to say, I do not blame anyone, and that alone is liberating.

I am not a victim. My parents loved me very well. They provided for me (and my siblings) better than many parents ever could. If they ever read this, I hope they read it from the perspective of their inner child, not as a parent.

Healing childhood wounds is a long, painful, yet essential and ethical journey. As we heal, our families begin to heal. When our families heal, our communities follow suit. Ultimately, when our communities heal, the world heals as well.

#mental health #psychology #therapy #healing #self awareness #inner child #trauma #personal growth #self reflection #emotional healing #alice miller #shadow work #intergenerational trauma #self compassion

4 notes · View notes

cebomar09-blog · 5 months ago

Text

Preface to the Blog

A Note On The Title

My favorite book, The Brothers Karamazov, is Fyodor Dostoevsky's most significant work—one of the most important works of literature ever written. Its three central characters are brothers, each representing a distinct orientation. The youngest, Alyosha, is a naive monk apprentice, embodying faith and devotion. Ivan, the middle brother, is a rigid and fiercely rational skeptic, while the eldest, Dmitri, is an impulsive, feelings-driven eccentric. I chose this title as a reflection of the human condition, as I believe we can all find aspects of ourselves within these characters and throughout literature.

The interplay of these characters mirrors the tensions I wrestle with in this blog—the conflict between faith and reason, emotion and intellect, and the quest for meaning amidst life's contradictions. In the same way that Dostoevsky explores their struggles, I aim to examine the interplay of psychology, religion, science, and philosophy to better understand the universal truths that govern existence. This blog explores these competing forces, a journey of integration, and a search for a foundation.

Like the Karamazov brothers, I, too, wrestle with a divided self—my intellect providing both clarity and unnecessary complexity, helping me make sense of things while deepening the feelings I try to understand (4w5-Enneagram). But a house divided, or one built on sand, cannot withstand the inevitable storm. Through these musings, I encounter my foundation in something transcendent—something well-established, beyond the reach of my unconscious biases (no big deal). My journey of exploration, seeking, reaching, and clinging to philosophies, ideologies, and religions has often felt like trying on clothes, discarding the parts that don’t fit, and ultimately ending up with a Frankenstein’s monster—isolated and wandering in the wilderness.

This blog, then, is both an intellectual and personal endeavor, an attempt to make sense of the contradictions within myself and the world. In sharing these reflections, I invite you to engage in this ongoing exploration—challenging ideas, embracing uncertainty, and perhaps finding clarity along the way.

Why I Write

This blog will be a collection of both academic work and personal reflections. It will blend psychology, religion, science, philosophy, and more—weaving these diverse perspectives into a coherent quest for truth. Seeking truth, after all, is a pragmatic pursuit. Yet, I often wrestle with whether the pursuit itself always serves the greater good or can cross into maladaptive patterns of thought and behavior. Perhaps the real challenge is recognizing when the search is no longer necessary—when one realizes they have already been found.

My goal is to create a space for intellectual exploration because true understanding is not achieved by passively absorbing information but by actively engaging with it—digesting it, applying it, and transforming it into life-giving energy. The diamond must be turned and examined, then put under pressure to measure its clarity—its prismatic veritas. And that is what I aim to do here with you. I want you to challenge and be challenged by these ideas

What I Write

It's appropriate to state a fundamental disposition of my thinking: there exists right and wrong, good and bad, healthy and unhealthy, and true and false (binaries/opposites/dichotomies). There is also variability in truth depending on stages of life, location in history, culture, and more. However, classical (the former example) and postmodern thought (the latter), like other lenses, have pros, cons, and limitations. The Truth I seek and aim to share is one of a universal order, the Logos, which is observable and logical. This binding narrative, the unfolding of Being itself, beckons to our attention as a gift from the top of Jacob's Ladder.

Nothing excites me more than discovering reality's fractal and layered elements, the Easter eggs that God places perfectly for those looking. When found at varying levels of reality and corroborated across diverse domains, a truth comes to life even more, and the truth at the foundation of all truths becomes clearer.

Consider the Hero’s Journey, a narrative structure found across mythology, literature, and personal development, which mirrors the psychological process of growth and transformation. The stages—departure, initiation, and return—are not just literary devices but reflections of how individuals navigate challenges, evolve, and integrate their experiences, just as civilizations and cultures do over time. This universal cycle of growth, loss, and renewal is deeply embedded in our collective stories and individual lives.

On an even grander scale, the spiral structure of DNA and galaxies demonstrates profound cosmic symmetry. The double helix of DNA, which encodes the blueprint of life, mirrors the spiral arms of galaxies, both following mathematical principles such as the Fibonacci sequence. This repetition across micro and macro scales suggests that the same underlying patterns govern life at all levels of existence, reinforcing the interconnectedness of everything.

The Human Condition and Our Shared Journey

We are continuations and adaptations of all that came before us—shaped by our genetics, environments, history, and experiences. To share myself with you is, in essence, to share a fragment of humanity with humanity itself. Many of our struggles stem from an unwillingness or inability to confront ourselves honestly. Yet, in our interactions with others, we often find mirrors reflecting parts of ourselves we might not otherwise see.

At the core of the human condition lies a fundamental duality: we exist within coexisting dimensions—the material and the spiritual, the biological and the symbolic, the animal and the human. In navigating this tension, we seek meaning, identity, and purpose. Join me as we explore and attempt to bridge this gap, striving to understand ourselves and the world with greater depth and sincerity.

Vocatus atque non vocatus, Deus aderit.

2 notes · View notes