eeveecraft

[eeveecraft]

I just got blocked without warning because a person got sick of their own sources proving them wrong that DID/OSDD/P-DID, etc are trauma-based. Like, it got sad and to the point where they admitted that they only briefly skimmed their sources before spamming me with them.

This person claimed to be "anti-sysmed," but literally was spouting sysmed rhetoric about how trauma is a requirement for DID.

So uh, newsflash: a disorder cannot be "trauma-based" if trauma is not a hard requirement to be diagnosed with the disorder. DID/OSDD/P-DID, etc are dissociative disorders, not trauma disorders. The DSM-V makes that clear:

[IMAGE TEXT:

Dissociative disorders are characterized by a disruption of and/or discontinuity in the normal integration of consciousness, memory, identity, emotion, perception, body representation, motor control, and behavior. Dissociative symptoms can potentially disrupt every area of psychological functioning. This chapter includes dissociative identity disorder, dissociative amnesia, depersonalization/derealization disorder, other specified dissociative disorder, and unspecified dissociative disorder.

Dissociative symptoms are experienced as a) unbidden intrusions into awareness and behavior, with accompanying losses of continuity in subjective experience (i.e., “positive” dissociative symptoms such as fragmentation of identity, depersonalization, and derealization) and/or b) inability to access information or to control mental functions that normally are readily amenable to access or control (i.e., “negative” dissociative symptoms such as amnesia).

The dissociative disorders are frequently found in the aftermath of trauma, and many of the symptoms, including embarrassment and confusion about the symptoms or a desire to hide them, are influenced by the proximity to trauma. In DSM-5, the dissociative disorders are placed next to, but are not part of, the trauma- and stressor-related disorders, reflecting the close relationship between these diagnostic classes. Both acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder contain dissociative symptoms, such as amnesia, flashbacks, numbing, and depersonalization/derealization.

END IMAGE TEXT.] This is on page 292, by the way. Yes, these disorders are often caused by trauma, nobody is debating that, but it is not the sole cause. The sources this user shared describes the disorders as "often caused by" or "trauma-related," etc, which are not the same as stating these disorders must have trauma to be present. Anyway, it was just kind of funny just so easily debunking every single point with their own sources until they got sick of it and blocked me.

7-6-2025

[eeveecraft]

New to tulpamancy, can tulpas switch into fronts? For example, I switched with one of my tulpas, what would change? Do tulpas have headspaces? Is it possible to have a tulpa fully "take over" the body while you hang around in a headspace, unaware of whats going on?

Thank you :]

I think pretty much any of these questions can be answered in this FAQ: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Yb6dfm4JxR5u_oNpHrttJyJHc0NvMhkKUP4Btc4jPc/edit?tab=t.0

6-26-2025

[eeveecraft]

don't forget to shower, take a bath, wash your face, brush your teeth, and whatever else!

even if you struggle to do it, it's worth it for the happiness of being clean afterwards

[eeveecraft]

You’ve been corrected by both me and Caflec on this.

No, people don’t make tulpas to “prove [their] mental strength.” You’re thinking of what Alexandria David-Néel wrote in her book. The second paragraph is more accurate, though.

6-15-2025

I don't get the difference is making alters in a willogenic way the same as a tulpamancy way?

Yeah, it seems like there's no difference but really the difference is only the purpose because willomancy means ���i purposefully created a headmate” while tulpamacy means “i proved my mental strength by creating an entire other presence” and now it's a preference thing.

The other difference is that tulpas are created for connections and less so for the purpose of plurality. Like they're very often more so made to be friends instead of doing typical roles in systems. Complicated but I hope this helps at least somewhat.

[eeveecraft]

Being Radqueer Is Not a Good Thing, Actually

Hi, yes, I'm making another post about radqueers because good fucking lord, they are EVERYWHERE in a lot of Plurality-focused tags. I've had to block what feels like dozens of BAH blogs specifically because they're pro-radqueer.

CONTENT WARNING: Discussions of CSA, abuse, paraphilic disorders. You have been warned!

What Is a Radqueer?

A radqueer is basically someone accepting of all paraphilias, including paraphilic disorders like pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia (known as "the big three"), etc. They also support things known as "trans IDs" where they basically put "trans" on a label like race, being a nazi, kidnapping, groomer, etc... Yeah... They've also appropriated terms from places like the Plurality community like bodily age, or transspecies from the alterhuman community.

A youtuber by the name of Jessicur recently did a video about the radqueer community where she also interviewed several people from that community that I highly recommend watching:

Why Is It Harmful?

Now, for most people, I shouldn't have to explain why radqueer is harmful. Paraphilic disorders like the big three shouldn't be allowed community, they shouldn't be "accepted" like people accept things like gender or sexuality. There's a difference between something like BSDM between two consenting adults, and a pro-contact pedophile in the radqueer community. In the interviews of Jessicur's video, you can see some of the radqueers she interviewed legitimately being "pro-contact," which uh, NO. And yet, they also say they're against abuse.

Or this one radqueer who was a part of a Discord server where people uploaded CSAM content and the server was then deleted, this radqueer was asked why the server was deleted, they said it was solely for abiding by Discord's TOS, not the fact that people were posting literal child abuse material. Yeah, pro-contact, yet anti-abuse, sure, buddy.

No, people with these disorders should seek help before they harm anyone, not be given a space that can quickly devolve into an echo chamber with how the radqueer label works. I know people with these paraphilic disorders are highly demonized, and that's often because of the conflation between attraction and action. There is a difference between experiencing attraction and then actually acting on it. A pedophile is not the same as a politician molesting a child. Attraction is not the sole reason why someone may assault a child.

So for the people with these disorders, we should be concerned, not acting on a gut reaction and advocating harm against them if they haven't actually done anything. For the ones that have, yeah, no, they deserve apt consequences and the victims deserve justice. That sh!t can be life-ruining. The demonization of these disorders is what pushes these people into communities like this, and that can legitimately end up making things far worse.

Though in Jessicur's video, you also hear from some of the radqueers that the radqueer community improved their mental health. To that, I say whatever improvement in someone's mental health there is in the radqueer community is far outweighed by the victims it creates. You can notice in the comments that a lot of people are pointing out how radqueer C sounds like someone who was groomed into being a radqueer, and that's exactly what I mean. There's other ways to improve your mental health without it harming others (see my please seek help instead point).

I also acknowledge that not everyone has easy access to help like therapy due to things like finances, and unfortunately, that is a systematic issue that needs to be addressed on a larger scale. Not to mention how the psychiatry industry is rife with patient abuse and just... human rights violations in general depending on where you are in the world. Telling people to seek help in that sense is not always a perfect answer, but I do think it's a better one than telling them to join a community that encourages harmful behaviors.

I wish I had a better answer to the problem, but the point boils down to: please do NOT join the radqueer community and engage with them. I think this comment summarizes the radqueer community's issues pretty well:

IMAGE TEXT: Last year I doomscrolled so badly on the radqueer tags and it literally made me so sick I had to call out for work. Never again.

Seriously, just don't engage with them, block them, and move on. It's not worth risking your mental health or getting sucked in.

And for whatever radqueer who reads this that I haven't blocked yet: know that you are not welcome on this blog, and you seriously need to reconsider what you're doing. This is harmful and you can do better by yourself and others.

For people who want to be able to spot radqueer content, pay attention to the tags. They use the rainbow and strawberry emojis like a calling card. They'll also often post tags like #pro rq, #pro 🍓🌈, #radqueer, #paraphiles please interact, #radqueers interact, etc.

(Also, can I just say how I hate how they appropriate two things I really like? Goddamnit, man.)

And thanks to Jessicur for making her video! She takes a look into the radqueer community without being a raging bigot and she genuinely tries to look at both sides. I really recommend taking the time to watch it. It helps shed light on this because I think this topic is solely under-discussed.

6-14-2025

[eeveecraft]

And no one should be shamed for needing clarification because they aren't an English major, nor are they capable of reading your thought process through a minimal text post.

Okay, yeah, it was unwarranted. Me being frustrated with people lacking literacy online does not give me right to throw strays towards a stranger. I apologize.

I'm going to leave out the majority of your post because I don't think replying to each point is a productive use of anyone's time and I feel like it would muddy the waters further.

Though I will answer this:

That's fine, but I don't really understand why you'd make a post that could spark conversation in that case, especially one you feel the need to be defensive over.

Because to me, it's better to make a short, well-intentioned post than post nothing at all, nor did I expect such a short post turn into a conversation that is... almost 3,000 words long. You can also say that any post on social media invites discussion. If I had to worry about every single post of mine turning into this kind of situation, I'd never post at all.

I don't think you're outright trying to be hostile, nor am I, and I think there's just a genuine communication issue here. At this point, this conversation has derailed. We can go on and on about how, "No, I'm not trying to be an ass, but you did this..." ad nauseam, but what is the point of that?

How about: we both acknowledge that we both misunderstood each other, could've handled it better, and try to do better? I apologize for coming out swinging when you just wanted clarification. I should've just answered your question like you said and we wouldn't be here.

And that's not enough, sure, we'll go our separate ways and that'll be that.

6-13-2025

Potential Red Flag that More than Tulpamancy Is Happening

If you and your tulpa(s) randomly switch (as in neither party consciously initiated it) or experience involuntary switches, that is not normal in Tulpamancy. Switching isn't random or involuntary in Tulpamancy; it's most often a mutual agreement between systemmates and a conscious thing that occurs. Tulpas don't randomly take front without warning or involuntarily in response to certain stimuli.

If you experience random/involuntary switching more than the random freak occurrence, you should look into dissociative disorders because this may be a symptom of something like DID.

6-5-2025

[eeveecraft]

It is so fascinating to see willogenic distort and twist in real time.

No, that’s not what willogenic meant when it was first coined. Willogenic literally is just an origin type where systemmates were “willed” into existence, hence the name. And nowhere in the definition does it say that willogenic systemmates specifically have to be made with a purpose. Doesn’t mention anything about faking it, either.

Also uh, no??? Tulpas aren’t just made to test mental strength??? Where did you get this information. Tulpas are made for a variety of reasons, the most common being a desire for companionship. So, unless you’re talking about Tibetan sprulpa, no, that’s just incorrect.

Tulpamancy is also far more than just “the father of willomancy,” put some respect on the name. Tulpamancy is a dedicated practice of systemmate creation with an entire community that’s existed for over a decade now, and is much larger than any willogenic communities, period. Modern Tulpamancy also isn’t religious; most Tulpamancers and tulpas believe the practice to be completely secular. This single answer alone demonstrates clearly that your knowledge on Tulpamancy and our community is really minimal, and you should’ve done proper research before answering this ask. Or hell, ask an actual Tulpamancy system.

6-12-2025

I have a question what's the difference between willogenic and tulpas? To me they sound the same but are treated differently is it the way that they are formed or something else?

(also would bah blogs be good for forming tulpas?)

Willogenic is fake it til you make it and don't have any specific meaning unless they're made to fulfil a purpose while tulpas are testing how strong your mind is by literally creating another presence.

Tulpamacy started with monks and it really was just a test to see if your mind was so strong that it could create another life. This practice was kinda a show of control and power and experience because it takes a lot to make a tulpa.

Nowadays, tulpamacy is done by more than monks because it's a shared religious practice and is always open to newcomers but it started off as a show of mental power and technically still is.

And yes, BAH packs help tulpas. Tulpamancy is, defined simply, just the father of willomancy.

[eeveecraft]

My tulpa is so babie....... how do see and hear himb??.I've only heard him once and I've never ever seen him :((

Have you checked out the various vocality and visualization guides out there?

Here's a few resources I can recommend:

Vocality:

Tips for Hearing Your Tulpa

Coaxing Tulpae Into Talking

Quantum Nametag's Method

Schlondark's Psychic Tulpa Voice Guide

Simple trick which helped me at least with tulpa's voice

Overcoming Parrotnoia: a short-ish guide

Tulpa Vocalization Practice (need to download the PDF since the original Google Doc is no longer accessible)

Visualization:

Basic Method On Practicing Visualization

Image Streaming

JD's Guide to Visualization

Teryakywind's Guide to Making the Imagined Real

Visualization Focus Guide

Can't see a dang thing?

Sensory Fundamentals: a Visualization Guide

Tulpa Appearance Tip

Pokemon battles in the wonderland

Hope at least some of these resources help you! Might just hold onto these to make an ORGANIZED masterlist of resources later.

6-10-2025

[eeveecraft]

Watching the willogenic spaces on Tumblr literally relive the *exact* same drama spikes as the Tulpamancy community is *wild.* It’s like I’m watching a speedrun of the Tulpamancy community, but not actually the Tulpamancy community, guys!

6-8-2025

i will also come out and say that i personally don't support host centricism in willomancy spaces. not that i've seen it personally, but i'm putting my opinion out there about it.

a headmate you created can absolutely take on a role for the betterment of everyone and so forth.

but the headmate you created is no lesser than you. they are just as sentient, sapient, and autonomous.

you are not more important than they are, you are their equal.

[eeveecraft]

You know what? I just realized I didn't quite answer your question properly:

I am still concerned, however, because I don't quite understand how being new to a community makes it inheritantly more likely to be DID vs endogenic simply because they haven't been exposed to either concept?

It's because there have been numerous instances of someone coming into the Tulpamancy community, thinking they have a tulpa, when reality, they have an alter and have a dissociative disorder. Tulpamancy and DID are more known than non-Tulpamancy, non-disordered Plurality, especially because of media (often harmfully) portraying these concepts. Therefore, it is easier for someone to come across the Tulpamancy community first. Yes, you could say that this is equally-likely for a non-disordered plural, but I have seen the former more often, and it's important to direct them to the right resources.

This doesn't come off as someone who wants to have a genuine discussion, especially when they go in the same post:

You're also coming off as classist and ablest.

I am not intending this as hostility or a fight.

If you want to talk about hypocrisy, this is hypocritical.

I acknowledge that the post could have had more clarification, but I am a busy person and am not nearly as involved in these communities anymore. I don't have the energy anymore to spend hours, writing entire essays on things like this. I am someone who's already written ad nauseam about Tulpamancy with incredible nuance in both my guide and FAQ, and that's a major reason why they're the longest in their respective categories in the Tulpamancy community. Just writing this response alone has left me drained, but I think you deserve a clear response that addresses the key points you laid out.

And no, people don't need to pay attention to your specific wording because 1: if it comes out of your mouth, then you are responsible for it, 2: everyone understands things differently, and 3 that's why people ask questions for clarification.

This is just incorrect. Language and wording matters. There is a significant difference between something like e.g. and i.e., or, "This will occur," versus, "This can occur." The amount of Tulpamancy resources I have criticized about using objective language in regards to Tulpamancy, a subjective experience cannot be understated. If you want to disregard the specific words, then look at the intention of the post. The intention was, "Hey, if you experience this, you might be having issues that you don't realize, and you might want to look into it." The intention was to spread awareness. What do you think is the worst possible thing that could happen if someone did not get that message? Because for me, I think whatever potential harm that could be caused there gets outweighed by the potential of someone reading this post, noticing they match the post, decide to look into it, realize they do have a dissociative disorder, and get help for it. That alone makes the post worth it, even if it's a flawed one.

And your own point defeats itself because yes, everyone does understand differently, but there is an infinite amount of ways things can be interpreted and understood. Do you reasonably expect someone to list every single way what is intended to be a short post can be interpreted every single time? Do you think that's reasonable? Especially in this circumstance where you are the only one so far who's had an issue with the post? Could you not also expect someone to try and look at a post from more than one angle? Do you think the responsibility should solely rest on the poster for that?

However not everyone, especially newcomers, will know whether that's abnormal or not without explanation. Which you included none of.

If someone blindly takes the word of a short, random Tumblr post without conducting any further research, that indicates a deeper issue than the post itself. And in that post, I did encourage the reader to research dissociative disorders if they believe what I listed applies to them. Again, what is the worst that can happen for that? They look into it and decide they don't match the rest of the criteria?

As an autistic person, I would struggle with that quite a bit unless you explain to me that there can be variation and what that variation might look like.

As I mentioned, I've already done this for years. I do not have the energy to account for every instance a person simply glosses over my wording or does not gel with how I write. I listed it as a potential red flag, explained that it's not normal in the Tulpamancy community specifically, and suggested the reader to conduct further research if they think the post applies to them. Just because I just wanted to make a short, simple post does mean I am incapable or don't care about variation. Again, I am a busy person with things outside of the Plurality community I deal with, and I do not have the time or energy to pour that much into a single post anymore. You can notice this by looking through this blog's activity and see how dead it is compared a few years ago.

The hypocrisy here is distasteful. It isn't harmful to suggest someone look into something IF certain things seem to coinside, but you listed one singular, incredibly common thing.

I literally already explained that no, this is not "incredibly common" in the Tulpamancy community specifically. It is not. That is simple fact. Points like this showcase that you're not familiar with the community this post is oriented towards. I've been in this community for almost eight years now and have seen all kinds of experiences from all kinds of people, and let me tell you, no, it's not common for a tulpa and host to randomly switch without warning unless in highly niche situations, that was intentionally trained or the system became disordered due to things like later trauma, or they're a mixed system, etc. It obviously is in the broader community, but the post wasn't for the random non-Tulpamancy plural.

So for someone who's so hung up on being specific, once again, why didn't you?

If I did and spent the next hour or two writing an 800+ word essay on the history of switching in the Tulpamancy community on every single type of switching and the gradient between types, would you be happy? What do you want me to do? I already admitted that yeah, I could've, but I didn't, and I've already explained why. Do you think it would be worth it since you're the only one here who's complained about it?

So if they manually created the barriers themselves then they still are a tulpamancy system. They're just perhaps very skilled at dissociation and got carried away. I suppose you could argue that they induced DID.

Okay, fair point. I never said you can't be both a Tulpamancy and DID system. Again, I didn't spend a lot of time on the post, but I still think it is important to note that these occurrences are just simply not the norm in the Tulpamancy community and that yes, they can be indicative of something that should be looked into. Yeah, I could've said, "Note: DID requires distress and dysfunction," or, "Though this type of experience is more common in non-Tulpamancy Plurality," or, "Note that abnormality =/= bad and depends on various circumstances." Would you be happy if I included those clauses in my post?

6-7-2025

Potential Red Flag that More than Tulpamancy Is Happening

If you and your tulpa(s) randomly switch (as in neither party consciously initiated it) or experience involuntary switches, that is not normal in Tulpamancy. Switching isn't random or involuntary in Tulpamancy; it's most often a mutual agreement between systemmates and a conscious thing that occurs. Tulpas don't randomly take front without warning or involuntarily in response to certain stimuli.

If you experience random/involuntary switching more than the random freak occurrence, you should look into dissociative disorders because this may be a symptom of something like DID.

6-5-2025

[eeveecraft]

There's a difference between being in a Tulpamancy system for 7 years and gradually becoming more fluid and someone who made a "tulpa" a week ago that randomly takes front without warning. This is also why the post is titled "Potential Red Flag that More than Tulpamancy Is Happening." Or, "...it's most often a mutual agreement between systemmates and a conscious thing that occurs." People really need to pay attention to the specific language a person uses.

With the former example, you can gauge why this behavior is happening because you're already well-versed in Tulpamancy and Plurality at that point. Like, there is a difference between intentionally training a systemmate to cofront upon like, smelling something specific versus them doing this suddenly with no discernible cause.

Was it wrong of me to expect people to have the reading comprehension to understand this point of mine? Maybe. General literacy has been taking a down-turn.

Also, I feel low-key disrespected by your fourth point with assuming I don't acknowledge tulpas are their own people. Yes, obviously, they are. I've made that abundantly clear on this blog for many years. Why do you think I specifically defined involuntary in this case as something non-consensual between both parties?

And with your fifth point, again, that is not the average Tulpamancy experience. It just isn't. The culture behind things like switching are different in the Tulpamancy community versus the broader community. Most Tulpamancy systems have to actively train switching and practice it like a skill. Unless you're already plural, this is not something that naturally comes to most Tulpamancy systems.

Like, sure, maybe I could've pointed out that DID specifically requires distress and dysfunction, but I also don't think it's harmful to encourage people to at least check or be aware of potential red flags like this. I made this post because I saw a story by a Tulpamancy system that got diagnosed with DID because they manually created memory barriers so strong that they had uncontrollable switches and significant gaps in memory.

Also, please note that I do not mean abnormal is bad. It isn't inherently a bad thing. Yes, involuntary switches are abnormal in the Tulpamancy community specifically, but depending on context, that does not necessarily make it a bad thing.

6-5-2025

Potential Red Flag that More than Tulpamancy Is Happening

If you and your tulpa(s) randomly switch (as in neither party consciously initiated it) or experience involuntary switches, that is not normal in Tulpamancy. Switching isn't random or involuntary in Tulpamancy; it's most often a mutual agreement between systemmates and a conscious thing that occurs. Tulpas don't randomly take front without warning or involuntarily in response to certain stimuli.

If you experience random/involuntary switching more than the random freak occurrence, you should look into dissociative disorders because this may be a symptom of something like DID.

6-5-2025

[eeveecraft]

Potential Red Flag that More than Tulpamancy Is Happening

If you and your tulpa(s) randomly switch (as in neither party consciously initiated it) or experience involuntary switches, that is not normal in Tulpamancy. Switching isn't random or involuntary in Tulpamancy; it's most often a mutual agreement between systemmates and a conscious thing that occurs. Tulpas don't randomly take front without warning or involuntarily in response to certain stimuli.

If you experience random/involuntary switching more than the random freak occurrence, you should look into dissociative disorders because this may be a symptom of something like DID.

6-5-2025

[eeveecraft]

Don't think I don't notice how tulpas/Tulpamancy has become completely secondary (or even tertiary) on Tumblr. Nearly every positivity post I see, willogenic is mentioned first, then tulpas/Tulpamancy (if at all).

You guys pretty much just spun up an entirely new subcommunity instead of supporting the one that already exists to the point where that subcommunity is getting more drama than us. That is actually insane and not in a good way.

I see posts about willogenic systems getting hundreds or more notes while Tulpamancy/tulpa posts receive mere scraps. It's depressing because the vast majority of the actual community does not use willogenic terminology (for multiple reasons), yet you've decided that's the primary vocabulary you decided will be used. You never consulted us or what we want, you just made decisions for us, and when some of us didn't budge, we got left in the dust.

I don't have the energy or time to be that active on this blog anymore, but goddamn, this sh!t pisses me off.

5-31-2025

[eeveecraft]

This is misinformation. Tulpamancy is not a spiritual practice, nor is it buddhist. The only link to Buddhism Tulpamancy has is the word "tulpa" being based off of "tulku" in Tibetan Buddhism and even then, their definitions are completely different. This is not hard to fact-check and I have debunked this point *multiple* times on this blog.

Secondly, a large majority of Tulpamancy systems view Tulpamancy as a solely psychological phenomenon, not spiritual. This information is easily viewable from the many community censuses that have been conducted by the community for years with the 2024 results coming out relatively soon.

For a tulpa-focused blog, you seem to get basic facts about our community wrong. Please do proper research about these topics before answering asks like these to avoid spreading further misinformation, thank you.

I'm very into religious and spiritual practices! Sooo are there any hacks related to that?

actually yes! tulpamancy originates from tibet buddhism and overall is spiritual practice. if you're looking into modern witchcraft, my personal fave tips:

- spells for speeding up the process

- give your tulpa/willomate your own energy. share. let them consume it and grow from it

- read guides about astral projection! there's plenty of methods, and they work so nicely about reaching wonderland/headspace

- meditations. different kinds, different purposes (focus; tulpa forcing; wonderland; etc etc etc). they can be boosted by proper incenses

also. i personally don't know much about that, but you can look into spiritual servitors and maybe there are a technique or two that you may use from there

[eeveecraft]

Wow, okay, I guess the broader Plurality community here on Tumblr has decided to up and leave Tulpamancy in the dust. I saw a post shouting out willogenic systems and how cool it is to willingly become plural, but that post had zero mentions of Tulpamancy, and yet it currently has over 600 notes. And sure, this coincides with one of my older posts not wanting to use Tulpamancy tags if they're not going to actively mention Tulpamancy or tulpas in their post, but it genuinely upsets me that people would rather exclude Tulpamancy entirely than just give us equal attention with positivity posts.

I see blogs dedicated to created system culture, willogenic culture, build a headmate blogs, etc, but almost nothing for Tulpamancy (besides one culture blog). It bothers me because Tulpamancy IS the original community centered around creating (intentional or unintentional!) systemmates. We're the community who created all the resources to make a headmate and strengthen the connection to them, we're the community with the censuses, and we're the community that has researchers actively conducting research to understand this type of Plurality. Tulpamancy systems who go on Tumblr are not going to see these posts and they're going to wonder why the Tulpamancy tag is so dead.

Why are we being excluded? Why can't we be mentioned in these positivity posts? Why is it so hard for Plural Tumblr to acknowledge we exist? The Tulpamancy community exists, Tulpamancy and tulpas are the terms, deal with it. The Tulpamancy community has been around for over 12 years now, and it deserves more respect than its getting.

Our lives have changed significantly since we created this blog and we don't have the time or energy to be super active on it. We never intended to become one of the most popular Tulpamancy blogs, but here we are. I wish other people besides Sophie would actively shout out Tulpamancy and acknowledge it. I'm just tired of Tulpamancy being treated as this other that's only whispered about at best.

2-9-2025

[eeveecraft]

https://www.tumblr.com/eeveecraft/756451503995273217/this-blogs-stance-on-radqueers?

I agree with everything in this post except when you’re talking about the acceptance of disordered paraphilias. Radqueer acceptance is very much harmful, but general societal acceptance would actually be extremely helpful to someone with this condition.

As it stands now, paraphilias are so stigmatized and prejudiced against that those who have them or suspect they have them are afraid of going to get help. They’re afraid of revealing that they’ve been experiencing those sort of thoughts.

A big risk factor for offending is ignoring or not getting treatment. (Not the only factor, but a big one.) In the current social climate, it feels unsafe to get said treatment, though, so many don’t. (Doesn’t mean they will offend; just that it becomes a more likely possibility when treatment is ignored.)

If society were more accepting of persons who had them (in a “actions are what make someone a good or bed person, not thoughts” sense), then it would make it a lot easier and less intimidating to get the help one needs.

So yeah. A lot of words to say “people with disordered paraphilias SHOULD be accepted” (just not in a “everything’s fine and good no matter what!” radqueer way)

So, why do you think I did not advocate for violence towards people with paraphelic disorders? Or tell people to go harass them? I made it clear that having a paraphelic disorder alone does not make you evil, it's acting on that disorder that does. Attraction =/= action. Paraphelic disorders should be as accepted as someone with a disease: they need help and should get it treated before it becomes a problem. The reaction should be concern, not anger or hatred.

To me, it's perfectly reasonable not wanting to be around a pedophile, zoophile, etc that aren't seeking treatment because those paraphilic disorders act as a warning sign, especially if they refuse to seek treatment. What if someone says they're a NOMAP and they keep saying they're never going to harm a kid? How can you tell if they're telling the truth, especially online? What if you believe them, then later down the line, one of their victims comes forward? We don't know the exact ratio of people with these disorders and how many of them actually harm people and animals.

No, I don't think someone should be beaten to a bloody pulp just by them saying, "I'm a pedophile," because again, pedophilia signifies attraction, not action. However, I do think they need professional treatment, and if it's found that they have victims, they deserve apt legal punishment. People need to stop conflating, "I am attracted to kids," with, "I have molested a child." They are not the same thing.

People need to first stop conflating paraphilic disorders with actual crimes, and then they need to condemn the crimes while promoting to people who have these disorders to seek treatment before they commit one of those crimes. People also need to realize that you do not need to have attraction to groom or rape someone. A lot of child molesters do it for the sake of control, power, and to dehumanize their victims, which said victims (children) have less rights than adults, are taken less seriously, and have less resources available for them to speak up. They're also often less educated than an adult on how to avoid grooming and sexual exploitation, making them ideal targets.

By saying I don't accept disordered paraphilias, I mean that they shouldn't be normalized or allowed to be left unchecked. Exactly the gross-ass rhetoric radqueers love to go on about is what I'm condemning.

2-6-2025

[eeveecraft]

Hey, just wanted to provide a slight correction on one of your willogenic posts: Extranth isn't the coiner, he just happened to post HD versions of the flags, and that post got really popular and is what's linked to first on Pluralpedia for some reason??? From his post:

"This term was created by an anonymous user, and was posted on the now deleted¹ blog @/plurgai-archive."

(¹it was actually terminated and all it's posts were nuked off Tumblr so that hasn't helped at all)

Sorry, this is really minor but I just wanted to correct that lol

Well, I'll be damned, you're right. Does not change the fact that Extranth, Pluragai, and that anon still directly mention Tulpamancy in their definitions (and still censor it and tulpa like they're slurs). It isn't really surprising that a blog like Plurgai would be terminated, honestly.

Wonder how that anon feels nowadays for the term they coined. Whoever you are, you coined a bad term and I want you to know that. All you did was divide the community further and cut people off from legitimately helpful resources.

2-2-2025