No but for real I’m listening to dndads latest episode [s2ep33] a second time and
Stewie does say “my dad goes there” when he’s talking about the bar to the group. And Peter is in that bar when they get there. And when they find scam he’s shifted into lois. So like. I think scam just like. Birthed Actual Stewie Griffin From Family Guy and Stewie wants to kill him. Bc he’s Lois.
I know very little about family guy but I feel like that’s a thing in the show too……..
……..
It is, I checked the wiki
we’re all guessing who Stewie secretly is and why he’d wanna kill scam but it’s just bc none of us have actually seen family guy so we didn’t know that’s just a plot from the show 😭😭😭
Hermie your real actual brother is real actual stewie griffin from family guy……
88 notes
·
View notes
MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS AS WEAPONS
Flute:
- hit someone with it
- play high notes for psychic dmg
- it has sharp edges???
- take it apart and throw it
- stab
- do you guys know who Wei Wuxian is? yeah
Drumsticks:
- hit someone like a drum
- stab
- down someone's throat:))
- use it like an arrow, but you need some kind of bow for that
- sharpen it and STAB again
38 notes
·
View notes
i don't have a point here except ???, but i realized today that starsky & hutch episode the psychic a) was written by micheal mann of (among many other things) classic crime thriller heat fame, and b) contains a baffling amount of (references to) crossdressing. it's one of the two episodes that opens with starsky and hutch chasing a guy in a dress (which gives us the "well i don't know, you('d) look rather nice in basic black and pearls" starsky-to-hutch line), later on they interrupt a robbery being committed by ANOTHER guy in a dress (and grey wig, posing as an old lady - presumably with the intent to disguise his identity rather than express some part of it, but who knows), and THEN they meet a hot lady mechanic who among many fast lines says to starsky "i'm really a basketball player in drag. whatever turns you on, honey" (interestingly timely, considering starsky's earlier comment about hutch). and finally, not entirely related but also not unrelated, there's these people at a laundromat hutch hits up on his mad phone chase at the end of the episode:
so yeah. ???.
32 notes
·
View notes
The TARDIS has been in Gloucester with the fugitive Doctor and it is pretty safe to say she is the same one Hartnell Doctor ran away with, right?
Now as I understand, the TARDIS should know everything (or at least something) then. About Division, about the fugitive Doctor. But she doesn't tell the Doctor and don't say 13 hasn't asked her. And, when we, as viewers, for once understand the TARDIS/Idris, she tells the Doctor that they have been travelling for 700 years (which about fits the age he says he is at that time and is rather too little than too much) and the first time they met was when she stole him (presumably as 1). Hence, she implies nothing of the Division time having happened to her.
Obviously this is dw, canon is flexible and the TARDIS definitely is as unreliable a narrator as the Doctor. But let's look at how this fits together for fun:
Option A) The TARDIS knows EVERYTHING. Past, future, present. She knows about Division and about 13 meeting the fugitive Doctor, already when talking to 11 and also afterwards, already when she steals 1. And she just doesn't tell. Because she doesn't want to or because it would hurt them too much or because she knows how this story goes and it involves her not telling them. Maybe time is holding a dagger to her metaphorical throat. She's got her reasons.
Option B) The TARDIS only knows things linearly. She may not experience time that way, but at any given moment she only 'remembers' things that have happened to her 'before'. (This is pretty unlikely taking Idris into account, but then again, she only knew things from her immediate future, I think. So maybe the memory is more or less linear after all with a grey area of a few minutes.)
Now there are two possibilities why she wouldn't tell 11 or 13 about Division:
Option B1) The TARDIS in Gloucester is not in the TARDIS's past, she is in her future. At some point 13's TARDIS will turn up at Division in the fugitive Doctor's time and the fugitive Doctor will feel an instant connection, using her for the escape. The TARDIS already knows the Doctor and tries to help her as best as she can.
This would explain the post-Hartnell design; the fugitive Doctor might be pre-Hartnell, the TARDIS isn't. I actually find this very interesting. It might even be that the Doctor 'lends' herself the TARDIS so they can find out more about Division via the ship. When the fugitive Doctor gets captured after 'Fugitive of the Judoon' (I'm assuming that is something that happens?), the TARDIS could return to the show's Doctor again.
Option B2) Gloucester has already happened to the TARDIS but she doesn't remember it either. And this would imply that Division managed to erase a TARDIS's memory. Which is extremely difficult I imagine and if it were possible would lead us to
Option C) The TARDIS knows past, present, future all at once, but she does not remember Division. Division have managed to hide every info about them that is stored in the TARDIS data core and she can't access it. After how I perceive the TARDIS and her loyalities and Division's methods, this option seems most likely to me.
This could also mean that the TARDIS knows she should be able to give the Doctor information but can't. Which would be extremely frustrating and might make her more prone to catching a sickness like the Flux. It could also be that the TARDIS remembers Division, but some code impedes her from sharing that information which would bring us back to option A.
23 notes
·
View notes