#AI in human form

[allycat75]

Hey Boston Dumb Fuck 👋! I saw your new ad today. Good to see you smiling again.

Fucking automoton!

[hypogryffin]

Erina and Sophie....

erina and sophie..... perhaps even sophie and erina....

[chongoblog]

The definition of “art” is incredibly abstract and varies from person to person, but if it doesn’t include South Park, then I think it’s being too gatekeepy

[tsuutarr]

The rabbit looks like it tryna be Judy hopps

POV: you're talking to an AI but he's really anxious and just overexplains everything

No but seriously this was unintentional haha but I can totally see it!! He's 100% based off of the White Rabbit from Alice in Wonderland, not Judy Hopps, but he lowkey does look a bit like her haha

Who knows, maybe I'll draw them together sometime! It could be fun >:)

[zishuge]

Let me lend you the Truth Eye. Turn around and take a look at him. See him in his true colors. Fangs of Fortune 大梦归离 (2024) | Ep. 13

[fkmarrycill]

Whew...

[allycat75]

I wonder how long it will take to repair the damage done over, like, 3 or 4 years? Maybe more, at this point.

[imaginal-ai]

"Spiritual Adept" (0001)

(The Mystery School Series)

[yoyo-s-coffee]

a break from the murder

[the-cat-and-the-birdie]

Do you ever think about the fact that Lyla could've easily told Miguel about Gwen seeing Miles or The Spot escaping as soon as Gwen told Jess?

and that considering she's a literal program and Miguels creation it would make perfect sense for her to rat on Gwen to him

But in that moment she didn't, because she actively chose not to - giving Jessica and Gwen the option to fix it without Miguel knowing

And that in the end Lyla DIDN'T tell Miguel. And Miguel only found out about everything once the hole opened in Mumbattan.

Do you ever think about that? Lyla exhibiting free will?? I do. I do a lot. I'm scared 😭

We talk about 'oh Jess was gonna tell Miguel-' LYLA COULD'VE TOLD HIM IMMEDIATELY. And she just... CHOSE not to???

DOES LYLA HAVE FREE WILL????

Did Miguel give her free will or did she just... develop it??? Does he know she can just.. decide to not cooperate with him? Or even lie to him if she wanted?

If Lyla can choose to lie about this... could she be choosing to lie about cano-

I'M SCARED SHE'S TOO POWERFUL

[das-a-kirby-blog]

I think there's a very clear difference in "wanting to work alongside ai" and "ai stealing the works of others without permission and never giving back"

[gojoest]

not the usual good morning post, but hello and morning! ( :

i’m deeply grateful to everyone who is looking out for me here — it truly means a lot and i appreciate it immensely. however, for my own peace of mind, i kindly request that you refrain from mentioning other users in my inbox, especially one in particular whom many of you are likely aware of. this is purely for my own comfort. thank you! 🤍

[allycat75]

Very sweet, Boston Dumb Fuck, but where have I heard this before? 🤔

Oh yeah, in 2014 for the Los Angeles Times, only you were much more eloquent and succinct, your brain not being as CAA-programmed and pot destroyed back then.

Did Elijah Eros help you write the one for Time Magazine? Maybe needed some help since you have taken much more than you have given in this friendship. Remember that little useless stunt you and the Nazi dumb dumb wifey pulled, pretending to be invited to the 2023 SNL X-mas party (the one where the murderer Alec Baldwin and his culturally appropriating wife, Hillary from Boston, were actually invited). This doesn't look like you put your "friend" in a comfortable spot in her very real marriage. No wonder Colin doesn't like you.

By the way, what did you and your child looking bride for hire do for twenty minutes, maybe hiding in the basement, to make it look like you were mingling with the landed gentry? Was she practicing her paint by numbers or her fake yoga? And were you impressing the security guards with a few simple card tricks and screaming at the top of your lungs that your wife is from Portugal- "Go Portugal!"

[imaginal-ai]

"Star-Spangled" (0002)

(More of The Superhero Style Series)

0001

[koszmarnybudyn]

Finished a sketch book, drew some SAYER doodles, mostly human designs, cause well they dont usually have physical forms.

[frank-olivier]

Against Romanticism: The Case for a More Nuanced Literary Approach

Iris Murdoch's lecture, delivered in 1959 at Yale as part of the Bergen lecture series, presents a thought-provoking exploration of the connection between literary problems and broader political and moral issues. In her critique of the liberal democratic theory of personality, Murdoch argues that it is inadequate due to its romantic elements, which prioritize individual freedom and autonomy over human complexity and relationships. This critique is rooted in the philosophical background of Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and existentialism, which emphasize reason, self-knowledge, and individual will over emotional expression and social connections.

Murdoch's notion of "romantic" differs from common understandings of the term, which typically emphasize emotions, beauty, and individualism. Instead, her critique of romanticism focuses on the overemphasis on individual freedom and autonomy, leading to a neglect of human complexity and relationships. This perspective is reflected in the works of great novelists such as Leo Tolstoy, Jane Austen, and Charles Dickens, who create characters that are free and separate beings with their own distinct personalities. These novels exemplify the "display of tolerance" mentioned in the lecture, presenting a plurality of characters with mutually independent centers of significance.

Murdoch's argument has significant implications for literature, particularly in the context of 19th-century novels. However, her critique of modern philosophies, such as existentialism and linguistic empiricism, suggests that contemporary literature has shifted away from this liberal tradition. The emphasis on individualism and subjectivity in these philosophies has led to a decline in nuanced character portrayals, a rise in experimental and fragmented narratives, and a focus on individual struggles over social dynamics. This trend is reflected in societal trends, including increased social isolation, polarization, and the erosion of tolerance and empathy.

According to Murdoch, great novelists are those who exhibit a distinct set of qualities, which are termed "unromantic" in the sense that they eschew conventional norms and personal psychological conflicts. These authors are characterized by their ability to create vibrant and realistic social scenes, well-developed and independent characters, and a willingness to accept the accidental and unpredictable nature of life. Murdoch's central argument against Romanticism is that it leads to a devaluation of the individual and the real world. By seeking a "timeless, non-discursive whole," Romantic writers create self-contained, symbolist works of art that are separate from the messy, individual, and boundless nature of real life.

This approach results in a loss of freedom for characters, a lack of respect for the existence of other persons, and a failure to appreciate the complexity and uniqueness of individual human experience. The tension between the Romantic pursuit of the "Timeless, non-discursive whole" and the portrayal of individual, contingent characters in novels creates a tension between two conflicting artistic and philosophical goals. The Romantic ideal of the "Timeless, non-discursive whole" emphasizes the universal, the necessary, and the eternal, whereas the portrayal of individual, contingent characters in novels emphasizes the particular, the individual, and the ephemeral.

To resolve this tension, authors can seek to integrate the particular, individual experiences of their characters with the universal, timeless themes and ideas that shape their lives. They can use literary devices, such as symbolism, metaphor, and imagery, to create a sense of unity and coherence while still portraying individual, contingent characters. Authors can also emphasize character development, exploring the complexities and nuances of human experience, while also seeking to reveal deeper, more essential truths about reality. The novel's unique contribution to the spiritual experience of readers lies in its ability to engage readers over an extended period, providing a sustained and immersive experience that can facilitate a deeper understanding of oneself and the world.

The novel's capacity for complexity and nuance, its use of language and symbolism, and its ability to reflect the human search for meaning also make it an ideal medium for facilitating a profound spiritual experience in readers. The importance of respecting the autonomy and individuality of fictional characters is essential for creating realistic and nuanced portrayals of human experience. By recognizing the complexity and richness of human experience, literature can capture the uncertainties and ambiguities of life, rather than imposing a preconceived form or meaning on it. Ultimately, Murdoch's argument highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of human complexity and relationships, and the importance of literature in promoting empathy, understanding, and social cohesion in contemporary society.

Iris Murdoch: On the Sublime & the Beautiful Revisited [Yale, 1959] (Philosophy Overdose, December 2024)

Friday, December 27, 2024