#Apple encryption

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Apple's encryption capitulation

I'm on a 20+ city book tour for my new novel PICKS AND SHOVELS. Catch me in NYC on TOMORROW (26 Feb) with JOHN HODGMAN and at PENN STATE THURSDAY (Feb 27). More tour dates here. Mail-order signed copies from LA's Diesel Books.

The UK government has just ordered Apple to secretly compromise its security for every iOS user in the world. Instead, Apple announced it will disable a vital security feature for every UK user. This is a terrible outcome, but it just might be the best one, given the circumstances:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo

So let's talk about those circumstances. In 2016, Theresa May's Conservative government passed a law called the "Investigative Powers Act," better known as the "Snooper's Charter":

https://www.snooperscharter.co.uk/

This was a hugely controversial law for many reasons, but most prominent was that it allowed British spy agencies to order tech companies to secretly modify their software to facilitate surveillance. This is alarming in several ways. First, it's hard enough to implement an encryption system without making subtle errors that adversaries can exploit.

Tiny mistakes in encryption systems are leveraged by criminals, foreign spies, griefers, and other bad actors to steal money, lock up our businesses and governments with ransomware, take our data, our intimate images, our health records and worse. The world is already awash in cyberweapons that terrible governments and corporations use to target their adversaries, such as the NSO Group malware that the Saudis used to hack Whatsapp, which let them lure Jamal Khashoggi to his death. The stakes couldn't be higher:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/02/04/citizen-lab/#nso-group

Encryption protects everything from the software updates for pacemakers and anti-lock braking to population-scale financial transactions and patient records. Deliberately introducing bugs into these systems to allow spies and cops to "break" encryption when they need to is impossible, which doesn't stop governments from demanding it. Notoriously, when former Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull was told that the laws of mathematics decreed that there is no way to make encryption that only stops bad guys but lets in good guys, he replied "The laws of mathematics are very commendable but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia":

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/07/australian-pm-calls-end-end-encryption-ban-says-laws-mathematics-dont-apply-down

The risks don't stop with bad actors leveraging new bugs introduced when the "lawful interception" back-doors are inserted. The keys that open these back-doors inevitably circulate widely within spy and police agencies, and eventually – inevitably – they leak. This is called the "keys under doormats" problem: if the police order tech companies to hide the keys to access billions of peoples' data under their doormats, eventually, bad guys will find them there:

https://academic.oup.com/cybersecurity/article/1/1/69/2367066

Again, this isn't a theoretical risk. In 1994, Bill Clinton signed a US law called CALEA that required FBI back-doors for data switches. Most network switches in use today have CALEA back-doors and they have been widely exploited by various bad guys. Most recently, the Chinese military used CALEA backdoors to hack Verizon, AT&T and Lumen:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/10/07/foreseeable-outcomes/#calea

This is the backdrop against which the Snooper's Charter was passed. Parliament stuck its fingers in its ears, covered its eyes, and voted for the damned thing, swearing that it would never result in any of the eminently foreseeable harms they'd been warned of.

Which brings us to today. Two weeks ago, the Washington Post's Joseph Menn broke the story that Apple had received a secret order from the British government, demanding that they install a back-door in the encryption system that protects cloud backups of iOS devices:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/

Virtually every iOS device in the world regularly backs itself up to Apple's cloud backup service. This is very useful: if your phone or tablet is lost, stolen or damaged, you can recover your backup to a new device in a matter of minutes and get on with your day. It's also very lucrative for Apple, which charges every iOS user a few dollars every month for backup services. The dollar amount here is small, but that sum is multiplied by the very large number of Apple devices, and it rolls in every single month.

Since 2022, Apple has offered its users a feature called "Advanced Data Protection" that employs "end-to-end" encryption (E2EE) for these backups. End-to-end encryption keeps data encrypted between the sender and the receiver, so that the service provider can't see what they're saying to each other. In the case of iCloud backups, this means that while an Apple customer can decrypt their backup data when they access it in the cloud, Apple itself cannot. All Apple can see is that there is an impenetrable blob of user data on one of its servers.

2022 was very late for Apple to have added E2EE to its cloud backups. After all, in 2014, Apple customers suffered a massive iCloud breach when hackers broke into the iCloud backups of hundreds of celebrities, leaking nude photos and other private data, in a breach colloquially called "Celebgate" or "The Fappening":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_celebrity_nude_photo_leak

Apple almost rolled out E2EE for iCloud in 2018, but scrapped the plans after Donald Trump's FBI leaned on them:

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/exclusive-apple-dropped-plan-for-encrypting-backups-after-fbi-complained-sour-idUSKBN1ZK1CO/

Better late than never. For three years, Apple customers' backups have been encrypted, at rest, on Apple's servers, their contents fully opaque to everyone except the devices' owners. Enter His Majesty's Government, clutching the Snooper's Charter. As the eminent cryptographer Matthew Green writes, a secret order to compromise the cloud backups of British users is necessarily a secret order to compromise all users' encrypted backups:

https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2025/02/23/three-questions-about-apple-encryption-and-the-u-k/

There's no way to roll out a compromised system in the UK that differs from non-British backups without the legion of reverse-engineers and security analysts noticing that something new is happening in Britain and correctly inferring that Apple has been served with a secret "Technical Capability Notice" under the Snooper's Charter:

Even if you imagine that Apple is only being asked only to target users in the U.K., the company would either need to build this capability globally, or it would need to deploy a new version or “zone”1 for U.K. users that would work differently from the version for, say, U.S. users. From a technical perspective, this would be tantamount to admitting that the U.K.’s version is somehow operationally distinct from the U.S. version. That would invite reverse-engineers to ask very pointed questions and the secret would almost certainly be out.

For Apple, the only winning move was not to play. Rather than breaking the security for its iCloud backups worldwide, it simply promised to turn off all security for backups in the UK. If they go through with it, every British iOS user – doctors, lawyers, small and large business, and individuals – will be exposed to incalculable risk from spies and criminals, both organized and petty.

For Green, this is Apple making the best of an impossible conundrum. Apple does have a long and proud history of standing up to governmental demands to compromise its users. Most notably, the FBI ordered Apple to push an encryption-removing update to its phones in 2016, to help it gain access to a device recovered from the bodies of the San Bernardino shooters:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/02/eff-support-apple-encryption-battle

But it's worth zooming out here for a moment and considering all the things that led up to Apple facing this demand. By design, Apple's iOS platform blocks users from installing software unless Apple approves it and lists it in the App Store. Apple uses legal protections (such as Section 1201 of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Article 6 of the EUCD, which the UK adopted in 2003 through the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations) to make it a jailable offense to reverse-engineer and bypass these blocks. They also devote substantial technical effort to preventing third parties from reverse-engineering its software and hardware locks. Installing software forbidden by Apple on your own iPhone is thus both illegal and very, very hard.

This means that if Apple removes an app from its App Store, its customers can no longer get that app. When Apple launched this system, they were warned – by the same cohort of experts who warned the UK government about the risks of the Snooper's Charter – that it would turn into an attractive nuisance. If a corporation has the power to compromise billions of users' devices, governments will inevitably order that corporation to do so.

Which is exactly what happened. Apple has already removed all working privacy tools for its Chinese users, purging the Chinese App Store of secure VPN apps, compromising its Chinese cloud backups, and downgrading its Airdrop file-transfer software to help the Chinese state crack down on protesters:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/11/foreseeable-consequences/#airdropped

These are the absolutely foreseeable – and foreseen – outcomes of Apple arrogating total remote control over its customers' devices to itself. If we're going to fault Theresa May's Conservatives for refusing to heed the warnings of the risks introduced by the Snooper's Charter, we should be every bit as critical of Apple for chasing profits at the expense of billions of its customers in the face of warnings that its "curated computing" model would inevitably give rise to the Snooper's Charter and laws like it.

As Pavel Chekov famously wrote: "a phaser on the bridge in act one will always go off by act three." Apple set itself up with the power to override its customers' decisions about the devices it sells them, and then that power was abused in a hundred ways, large and small:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/22/vin-locking/#thought-differently

Of course, there are plenty of third-party apps in the App Store that allow you to make an end-to-end encrypted backup to non-Apple cloud servers, and Apple's onerous App Store payment policies mean that they get to cream off 30% of every dollar you spend with its rivals:

https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1iv072y/endtoend_encrypted_alternative_to_icloud_drive/

It's entirely possible to find an end-to-end encrypted backup provider that has no presence in the UK and can tell the UK government to fuck off with its ridiculous back-door demands. For example, Signal has repeatedly promised to pull its personnel and assets out of the UK before it would compromise its encryption:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/05/theyre-still-trying-to-ban-cryptography/

But even if the company that provides your backup is impervious to pressure from HMG, Apple isn't. Apple has the absolute, unchallenged power to decide which apps are in its App Store. Apple has a long history of nuking privacy-preserving and privacy-enhancing apps from its App Store in response to complaints, even petty ones from rival companies like Meta:

https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/29/23378541/the-og-app-instagram-clone-pulled-from-app-store

If they're going to cave into Zuck's demand to facilitate spying on Instagram users, do we really think they'll resist Kier Starmer's demands to remove Signal – and any other app that stands up to the Snooper's Charter – from the App Store?

It goes without saying that the "bad guys" the UK government claims it wants to target will be able to communicate in secret no matter what Apple does here. They can just use an Android phone and sideload a secure messaging app, or register an iPhone in Ireland or any other country and bring it to the UK. The only people who will be harmed by the combination of the British government's reckless disregard for security, and Apple's designs that trade the security of its users for the security of its shareholders are millions of law-abiding Britons, whose most sensitive data will be up for grabs by anyone who hacks their accounts.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/02/25/sneak-and-peek/#pavel-chekov

Image: Mitch Barrie (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Daytona_Skeleton_AR-15_completed_rifle_%2817551907724%29.jpg

CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en

--

Kambanji https://www.flickr.com/photos/kambanji/4135216486/

CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

--

Rawpixel https://www.rawpixel.com/image/12438797/png-white-background

[tofueatingwokerati]

The UK no longer has end to end encryption thanks to Keir Starmer’s Labour government reanimating the zombie policy that is the Snoopers Charter, first peddled by Theresa May’s Tory government and rejected by the public.

Apple withdrawing end-to-end encrypted backups from the UK "creates a dangerous precedent which authoritarian countries will surely follow".

UK now likened to authoritarian regimes and why Starmer won’t challenge Trump since he is in lock step with US policies, openly goes after sick, disabled, pensioners and poorest, increasing their hardship rather than tax the mega rich. US policy is UK policy.

So what does this mean for Apple users in the UK?

All your data in the cloud is no longer secure in comparison to having ADP enabled and can be accessed by the government upon request. The GDPR is all but dead in the UK, there are now so many government policies that snoop on us by the back door with even news outlets online now charging us for access without *cookies enabled (data farming you whilst you read with no option to opt out unless you pay)

I checked with the ICO myself and it is a fully approved policy despite its contradiction to the rights of consent, removed in the process.

If you want a workaround here are my suggestions

Cancel your iCloud storage, your data will stay on the cloud until the renewal date, use that time to back it up locally or on a flash drive.

Change your iMessage settings to delete audio messages after 2 minutes and permanently delete messages after 30 days.

Alternatively, use a third party messaging app with a delete on read feature and disable Apple iMessage altogether.

If you are tech savvy you can set up a USB drive or flash drive directly into your router hub (you should have at least one USB slot, some have two) and use FTP to back up over wifi, you can do this on any device, you don’t need a desktop.

Use a VPN service or set one up. If you’re really technical you can use a Raspberry Pi to do this, but you will need to hard code it. Think Mr Robot.

This change does not impact sensitive data like medical details which remain end to end encrypted.

If you want to learn more on the sweeping bills being pushed through government and any action your can take visit Big Brother Watch: https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk

*If you want to read news articles without paying for the privilege of not handing over your cookie data, simply disable javascript within your browsers settings and refresh the browser page. Remember to turn it back on when your done. Alternatively disable all cookies but know this will impact your online experience and access.

[nonenosome2]

apple disables iCloud encryption in UK after government order

FYI for anyone in the UK with an iPhone.

Apple disabled end-to-end encryption because the UK Government sent Apple a Secret Order to put in a backdoor and Apple decided to turn it off instead since adding a backdoor would do the same thing for the UK.

This isn't bashing Apple by the way. One of the few times I side with them on something. Better to let everyone know they don't have privacy in the UK rather than letting their Government pretend they don't have access.

[aeolianblues]

Any chinese-owned technology is automatically assumed to come with backdoors for the Chinese govt to spy on foreign citizens, but when the UK explicitly asks Apple to allow access to global users' encrypted information stored in the cloud, then it's just okay and it's Europe standing up to big tech and doing the routine rounds of anti terrorism just tells me most media outlets don't really care about privacy, it's just editorial policy to portray China as evil. Anyone as long as they're not from an advanced, smart and civilised European country, right? If you think European exceptionalism isn't a thing, look again.

[nando161mando]

Signal has long said it'd "rather shut down or leave a market" than add a backdoor or weaken its encryption.

Apple also had this option when it was ordered by the UK government to build an iCloud backdoor. Apple could have said — without violating secrecy laws — why it was leaving the UK, rather than weaken the security of all of its UK customers.

Instead, Apple capitulated to the demand to keep operating, and prioritized its profits over its customers' security.

[harrelltut]

1921 Quantum Dara™ Domain Compu_TAH [PTAH] CARTEL [PC] Say... I.B.MICHAEL [IBM].gov Military of 1968genX.com who Architecturally Incorporated [A.i.] Attdotcom.com + ibmdotcom.com [A.i.] @ 1921 QUANTUM 2023 HARRELL 2024 TECH 2025 Apple & IBM [A.i.] LLC of ATLANTIS [L.A.] 5000

IMMORTAL U.S. MILITARY KING SOLOMON-MICHAEL HARRELL, JR.™

i.b.monk [ibm] mode [i’m] tech [IT] cartel @ quantum harrell tech llc

OMMMMM eye bee machine [ibm] engineering quantumharrelltech.net [eq]

OMMMMM EYE QUANTUM [EQ] TECHNOCRAT [E.T.] @ 1921 QUANTUM 2023 HARRELL 2024 TECH 2025 Apple & IBM [A.i.] LLC of ATLANTIS [L.A.] 5000

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

OMMMMM

1921 quantum harrell tech llc control the international telecommunication [IT] industry

QUANTUMHARRELLTECH.gov Military of Apple IBM & AT&T [AIA] watching harrelltut on Tumblr

[marithlizard]

Oh _lovely_. Everyone go turn this off:

Enhanced Visual Search in Photos allows you to search for photos using landmarks or points of interest. Your device privately matches places in your photos to a global index Apple maintains on our servers. We apply homomorphic encryption and differential privacy, and use an OHTTP relay that hides [your] IP address. This prevents Apple from learning about the information in your photos. You can turn off Enhanced Visual Search at any time on your iOS or iPadOS device by going to Settings > Apps > Photos. On Mac, open Photos and go to Settings > General.

[channeledhistory]

Im Vereinigten Königreich kämpft Apple derzeit gegen die Einführung sogenannter Hintertüren in die Ende-zu-Ende-Verschlüsselung des Unternehmens: Diese würden der Polizei und den Geheimdiensten ermöglichen, verschlüsselte Inhalte, darunter Dokumente, Sprachaufzeichnungen und Fotos, bei Bedarf zu entschlüsseln und mitlesen zu können. Sicherheitsexperten warnen: Die Entscheidung könnte weitreichende Folgen für den Einsatz von starker Verschlüsselung haben – und das nicht nur für Kundinnen und Kunden von Apple in Großbritannien.

Anfang Februar hatte die Washington Post als Erste berichtet, dass die britischen Behörden Apple aufgefordert hätten, eine Hintertür in den iCloud-Speicher des Unternehmens einzubauen. Dabei ging es nicht nur darum, Zugriff auf die Inhalte einzelner Konten zu erhalten, sondern um die Möglichkeit, jederzeit jeden iCloud-Account entschlüsseln zu können. [...]

Dass iCloud im Fokus der Behörden steht, hat einen Grund, und der heißt ADP: Advanced Data Protection, erweiterter Datenschutz. Im Dezember 2022 hatte Apple diese Option für seine Nutzerinnen und Nutzer angekündigt. Ist ADP aktiviert, werden zahlreiche Inhalte, die von einem Apple-Gerät aus in iCloud hochgeladen werden, Ende-zu-Ende verschlüsselt. Die Verschlüsselung findet lokal auf dem iPhone oder Mac statt und die dafür notwendigen Schlüssel sind auf dem jeweiligen Gerät hinterlegt. Weder Apple noch Dritte können so die Inhalte in der Cloud entschlüsseln, ohne Zugriff auf das Endgerät zu haben.

[...] Cloudspeicher wie iCloud, Dropbox, Samsung Cloud oder auch Google Photos verschlüsseln zwar prinzipiell alle Inhalte, die von Nutzern hochgeladen werden. Allerdings erst, nachdem diese auf den Servern der Unternehmen gelandet sind. Das bedeutet, dass die Unternehmen über die jeweiligen Schlüssel verfügen und diese, wenn sie per Beschluss dazu aufgefordert werden, mit Strafverfolgungsbehörden teilen können oder müssen. Für die Behörden sind Cloudspeicher ein beliebtes Mittel, um an Informationen zu gelangen. [...]

Bei Strafverfolgern in zahlreichen Ländern stieß die Funktion auf Kritik. Ihr Argument: Starke Verschlüsselung erschwere es ihnen, Straftaten zu verhindern und aufzuklären. Stattdessen helfe sie Terroristen bei der Planung von Anschlägen oder Menschen, die Inhalte wie Fotos von Kindesmissbrauch teilen. [...]

Nach Gesprächen, die sich offenbar über die vergangenen zwei Jahre hinzogen, hat die britische Regierung Apple nun dazu aufgefordert, eine Hintertür in ADP einzubauen. Als rechtliche Grundlage für die Forderung dient der Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) aus dem Jahr 2016. Dieses von den Kritikern Snooper's Charter – Schnüfflergesetz – getaufte Gesetz hat die elektronischen Überwachungsfähigkeiten der britischen Polizei und Geheimdienste deutlich erweitert. Es sieht zudem vor, dass Unternehmen dazu aufgefordert werden können, "technische Kapazitäten aufzubauen, um rechtmäßige Anfragen nach Daten im Rahmen des IPA zu beantworten", wie es in dem Gesetz heißt.

Vergangene Woche hat Apple auf seiner Website deshalb angekündigt, die Advanced Data Protection im Vereinigten Königreich auszusetzen. Eine Erklärung fehlt, was nicht überrascht: Gemäß des IPA darf ein betroffenes Unternehmen nämlich nicht öffentlich machen, wenn es die Aufforderung erhalten hat, technische Maßnahmen zu ergreifen. Von Apple gibt es deshalb auch keine Stellungnahme jenseits der allgemeinen Ansage, "niemals eine Hintertür oder einen Generalschlüssel in unsere Produkte oder Dienstleistungen einzubauen". Wobei einige Experten behaupten, das sei längst geschehen.

Wie verschiedene Medien am Dienstag berichten, habe Apple nun Einspruch vor dem sogenannten Investigatory Powers Tribunal eingereicht. Dabei handelt es sich um ein unabhängiges Gericht, das Beschwerden gegen die britischen Sicherheitsdienste prüft. Wie die Financial Times schreibt, sei es das erste Mal, dass die Bestimmungen zur Aushebelung von Verschlüsselung vor Gericht geprüft werden. Eine mögliche Entscheidung – sowohl für als auch gegen Apple – könnte also weitreichende Folgen haben.

Tatsächlich steht nämlich nicht nur die Option auf starke Verschlüsselung in Großbritannien auf dem Spiel, sondern weltweit. Die Bürgerrechtsorganisation Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) schreibt, dass es keinen technischen Kompromiss gebe "zwischen einer starken Verschlüsselung, die Daten schützt, und einem Mechanismus, der einer Regierung einen besonderen Zugang zu diesen Daten ermöglicht". Eine Hintertür in Ende-zu-Ende-Verschlüsselung sei letztlich nur eine zusätzliche Schwachstelle, die für Hackerangriffe, Identitätsdiebstahl und Betrug genutzt werden könne.

[...]

[diagnozabam]

Apple cedează presiunilor autorităților britanice: Criptarea end-to-end pentru iCloud, dezactivată în Marea Britanie

Apple a confirmat oficial că renunță la criptarea end-to-end oferită prin sistemul Advanced Data Protection (ADP) pentru utilizatorii iCloud cu conturi nou create în Regatul Unit, urmând ca și utilizatorii existenți să fie afectați de această decizie. Acest pas marchează un compromis semnificativ în politica de confidențialitate a companiei americane, realizat în urma presiunilor exercitate de…

[techaddictsuk]

Tech Addicts 2025 - The Encryption Element

Gareth and Ted chat about the UK Government compelling Apple to give access to encryption, Meta torrenting ebooks, Coolermaster unleashing the Masterhub, Windows 98, AOL Desktop, film photography and Ted's take on the Marshall Monitor III.

Gareth and Ted chat about the UK Government compelling Apple to give access to their encryption, Meta torrenting ebooks, Coolermaster unleashing the Masterhub, Windows 98, AOL Desktop, film photography and Ted’s take on the Marshall Monitor III. With Gareth Myles and Ted SalmonJoin us on MeweRSS Link: https://techaddicts.libsyn.com/rssDirect Download | iTunes | YouTube Music | Stitcher | Tunein…

[jose96853]

UK FORCES APPLE TO GRANT GLOBAL ACCESS TO ENCRYPTED USER ACCOUNTS

The UK government has reportedly ordered Apple to create a backdoor that would allow security officials to access users’ encrypted iCloud backups. If Apple complies, British authorities could access backups from any user worldwide, not just UK residents. Additionally, Apple would be prohibited from informing users that their encryption had been compromised. According to The Washington Post, this…

[rwnnews]

UK Demands Access to Apple Users' Encrypted Data.

UK Demands Access to Apple Users’ Encrypted Data. In a controversial move, the United Kingdom government has issued a secret order demanding that Apple create a backdoor to access encrypted data stored by Apple users worldwide. The order, issued in January 2025 under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (also known as the “Snoopers’ Charter”), has sparked significant debate over privacy and…

[mattdobbins]

iMessage and Secure Communication

In the process of updating my blog to align with Fediverse standards and protocols, I realized that iMessage could be a great option for secure communication. I wasn’t aware that you can prompt a link to open a new iMessage chat. By creating a disposable iMessage alias and disabling unknown FaceTime calls, you can keep your contact information accessible while maintaining clear boundaries.

[kerrybowers]

How Does Apple Prioritize User Privacy?

Apple puts user privacy first. Their products and services focus on keeping data safe. Apple knows that privacy matters. It builds trust with users. Every feature Apple creates considers privacy. Their slogan, "Privacy. That's iPhone," reflects this. Let’s explore how Apple does it.

Encryption to Protect Data

Apple uses encryption to secure data. Encryption turns data into unreadable code. Only authorized users can access it. For example, iMessages are end-to-end encrypted. This means no one else can read them. Not even Apple has access. Another example is FaceTime calls. These are also end-to-end encrypted. It ensures conversations remain private.

Apple devices also encrypt stored data. An iPhone’s storage is protected. If someone tries to hack it, the data stays safe. Apple also has strong passcode requirements. Complex passwords increase security. Many users feel secure knowing their devices use advanced encryption.

Privacy Features in Apps

Apple gives users control over apps. Apps must ask before accessing data. For example, location sharing needs permission. Users decide which apps can see their location. A user can allow access all the time, only once, or never. This ensures apps don’t track users secretly.

Another feature is App Tracking Transparency. Apple introduced this in 2021. It requires apps to ask before tracking. Users can deny tracking requests. This protects personal data from advertisers. Many users appreciate this. They feel safer browsing and using apps. Some companies dislike it, but users benefit.

Apple also monitors app behavior. Apps that misuse data face removal. This holds developers accountable. It shows Apple’s commitment to privacy. Users trust Apple’s strict rules. They know their data won’t be misused.

Experiences with Privacy Notices

Apple sends clear privacy notices. These notices explain data use. For example, the App Store has privacy labels. These labels show how apps use data. Users see if apps collect their info. This helps them make informed choices. A user shared their story online. They avoided downloading an app after reading its privacy label. It shows how useful these labels are.

Apple also educates users about phishing scams. A friend once received a fake email. It looked like it came from Apple. The email asked for login details. Luckily, Apple teaches users to avoid such scams. The friend ignored the email and stayed safe. Apple’s efforts help people stay alert.

Device Privacy Settings

Apple devices have many privacy settings. Users can control microphone and camera access. If an app uses the microphone, a light appears. This ensures transparency. A user once found an app misusing the microphone. Thanks to Apple’s settings, they stopped using it. This feature builds trust.

Apple also limits ad tracking. Users can turn off personalized ads. This stops Apple from using their data for ads. A family shared how this helped them. They found fewer targeted ads. It made their online experience more comfortable. These settings are easy to find. Apple ensures privacy remains simple.

Privacy in the Cloud

iCloud keeps data private. Apple uses two-factor authentication. This adds a second security layer. A user must verify their identity to log in. Even if someone gets their password, they can’t access iCloud. A student shared how this saved them. Their account was safe after a password leak. Apple’s cloud system shows strong privacy.

Apple also encrypts iCloud backups. Photos, messages, and files stay protected. Only the user can access them. If someone steals a device, they can’t view the data. Apple constantly improves cloud security. Regular updates ensure it stays strong.

Conclusion

Apple prioritizes user privacy in many ways. They use encryption, app controls, and clear notices. Their devices have strong privacy settings. Even iCloud focuses on security. These efforts build user trust. People feel safe with Apple products. Privacy remains a core value at Apple. Their dedication inspires confidence in millions.

Discover BizRadarUSA: Your Comprehensive Source for USA Contact Information

For in-depth access to extensive USA contact details, explore the BizRadarUSA directory. Offering a wide array of listings, this resource ensures you can find specific contacts across various industries and regions within the United States. Whether you’re searching for business contacts, customer service numbers, or professional connections, BizRadarUSA is a dependable platform to streamline your search. Utilize its user-friendly interface and vast database to access the most relevant and current contact information tailored to your needs. Efficiently uncover detailed American business contact information with the BizRadarUSA directory today.

[alexandriaanderson1536]

Exploring the Benefits of SwitchBot's Smart Lock for Your Home

Hello there! Thanks for taking the time to read my post. I'm really excited to share my thoughts on the SwitchBot smart lock that fits over existing deadbolts, and how it can enhance your smart home experience.

Let me give you a bit of background. The SwitchBot smart lock is designed to seamlessly integrate with your current deadbolt, providing a simple yet effective upgrade to your home security. This means you don't have to replace your entire locking system, making it an easy and convenient solution.

Installing the SwitchBot smart lock is a breeze! It fits right over your existing deadbolt, and you can have it up and running in no time. Once installed, you can control your lock remotely through the SwitchBot app, allowing you to lock or unlock your door from anywhere. This feature is especially handy when you're away from home or if you have guests arriving.

One of the standout features of the SwitchBot smart lock is its compatibility with various smart home systems. Whether you use Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, or Apple HomeKit, you can incorporate voice commands into your home security routine. Imagine the convenience of saying, 'Lock the door' and having it done instantly!

Additionally, the smart lock enhances your home’s safety with its advanced encryption technology. You can rest easy knowing that your home is protected with the latest security features.

In conclusion, if you're looking to upgrade your home security with a smart lock that fits over your existing deadbolt, I highly recommend considering the SwitchBot smart lock. It's user-friendly, secure, and a fantastic addition to any smart home setup. Thanks for reading, and I hope you find this information helpful!