Tumgik
#Democracy is numbers
Text
Japan cannot be even an imitation (poetry)
Tumblr media
Noboru Takeshita (wiki)
Japan imitates Britain, parliamentary democracy
It's not even an imitation.
England as early as 1215
realized democracy. (Magna Carta)
It's the stupid king "John Lackland"
Let the lords recognize their authority,
In other words, it put restrictions on the power of the king.
The lords have earned the right to act without compromise.
In the case of Japan, a stupid prime minister (substantial king)
Although we have produced many
If Japanese people don't like that guy
We won’t take action to expel him.
This is an abdication of citizenship.
(In other words, many people do not go to vote.)
I think without resorting to force
We could get rid of the idiots—
From citizens who do not vote,
We should take away the right to vote.
Fighting and winning is democracy.
Japan, how long will you be an imitation?
Former Prime Minister of Japan Noboru Takeshita declared: "Democracy is numbers." He said democracy is to force a majority vote onto the seats won by money election.
(2021.10.10)
5 notes · View notes
Text
"You can't change people's minds" where does the change in social change come from then? Spare coins?
Not everyone is up to debate and convince people otherwise but that's why activism is a skill worth learning. Just because you couldn't do it doesn't make it impossible.
1K notes · View notes
fairuzfan · 6 months
Text
Apparently Biden's aides are urging him to call for a ceasefire but he's refusing to listen to them the same for congress aides. He thinks its a "loud minority" speaking up against the genocide. If any one of you vote for Biden he will take it as a sign that he did good and do it again if he sees fit. You are not safe.
966 notes · View notes
carsonjonesfiance · 2 months
Text
Democracy is when Bernie wins and fake democracy is when anyone else wins, am I an expert in political sciences.
112 notes · View notes
blood-mocha-latte · 5 months
Text
if you haven't seen all three, care to specify? i'm Nosy
42 notes · View notes
jeansyvesmoreau · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Um. Wow. I'm shocked that over 300 of you even find following me worthwhile?? And there aren't any pornbots because I'm still committed to blocking and reporting them?? Thank you thank you thank you. I've hardly had this blog for long and never thought I'd get this many this quickly. Special thanks to @nyxxxxxxxx for being the 300th <3
So I kinda thought about doing something, but all I can really think of is one thing, so I'm going with that hahah. (gods I'm so bad at this) So for the first time in my life, I'll be taking requests. They might take some time to finish, since I have other edits I want to work on and school, but I'll tag you when I'm done!
Send in a picture (any kind, really), along with the 💌 emoji and I'll edit it with some Taylor lyrics. You can request a specific song if you'd like, but don't feel pressured to
I'll be taking requests until the end of February.
Ily all tysm 💞💜❤💕
Tagging some mutuals who I know like Taylor under the cut (send requests in as well if I don't tag you because my memory is awful, also if you're tagged don't feel like you need to send one in!):
@sleepless-crows @tisthedamnseasns @withpaperings @faeeclipseruine @oracle-cookies @apollosbisexualass @tolerateit @ell0ra-br3kk3r @drowninglnstars @holdthegirlofmydreams @stood-onthecliffside @heystephcn @thegreattwar @cowboyliketartt @bettysparksfly @reputation @gotlostinwonderlands @userswifts @castlescrumblingtv @taylorswifff @firstnightthatyousawme @moonstonemidnights @placeapuppyinmyhair @grishaverse-chaos @tsparis @snownonthebeach @roryfolklore @happinessforevermore @maimyoutoo @dam-bluecookies @seulgibabes @nutellas-ni @flashbackwhenyoumetme @youreonyourownkid @fightwithyouinmysleep
58 notes · View notes
cbk1000 · 9 months
Text
Oh my God. Just read an article with some quotes from one of Trump's lawyers, and their defense apparently is going to be that Trump was only ASKING for Pence to throw out slates of electors and pause the certification process, which is 'core free speech.' 'Asking is aspirational. Asking is not action.'
Fellas, is it your First Amendment right to order people to do crime for you?
24 notes · View notes
scribefindegil · 1 year
Note
do you think mob and mabel would get along?
YES.
for the sake of this ask we're ignoring the language barrier; Mabel borrowed some translator thing from Ford so they can talk to each other, it's fine.
Mob is friends with Tome, so he's used to hanging out with Weird Girls who talk a mile a minute, so even though Mabel would be a little overwhelming at first I think they'd be able to settle into a good dynamic! Mabel simultaneously would and wouldn't make a big deal about his psychic powers. Like, she'd get super excited about them but she gets super excited about everything so she'd be like "Oh WOW you have psychic powers?? That's so cool! I have a pig!! Do you want to meet him??"
Also they both love fluffy sweaters!! She could teach him how to knit! He'd be very bad at it at first but he's very stubborn and she's very encouraging and he'd end up having a really good time!
48 notes · View notes
lwcina · 6 days
Text
the fact that the us government can continue funding and arming a genocide despite massive public opposition really highlights how inherently non-democratic the united states is
#almost like the idea of a representative demcracy is both historically undemocratic and inherently is incapable of being so#by historically i mean that representative democracies have always meant the creation of a category of ‘citizen’ that is above ‘non-citizen#even the civilization where the term democracy comes from was patriarchal and had fucking slavery#not chattel slavery but (hot take) non chattel slavery is still bad.#also fundamentally one person can literally not represent the wishes of a large collection of people who have only geography in common.#theyre going to want different things!!!#now the idea of if democracy is inherently a virtue is like. another topic. but i will say that like seeing the history of like the#popular sovreignty movement wrt to slavery really made me question it. just because a lot of people want something to happen doesnt#actually mean it should happen. white people voted to legalize slavery#kind of where the old ‘minority’ terminology comes in. just by numbers alone in the states that had these votes it wasnt like in the south#where in the south because of plantations the actual population majority in some places was black.#but in those midwestern new states even if everyone person there could have voted. white people would still be the vasy majority.#honestly to a degree pointing out that none of the societies that have claimed to be democracies have truly been democratic is…#i guess the primary value in it is to challenge people who take state mythologies at face level#a very large population that i often forget exists.#the ‘they cant do that its illegal’ types.#anyways. if we consider that every society in documented history has had some type of violence and oppression#and if we believe that people are NOT inherently selfish/violent#it follows that what we need to do is something different than what we have been doing.#not just different from what we are doing right now. but different from what we have been doing for the past centuries#but also i can imagine that societies and ways of living that aren’t legible to the status quo or just went undocumented for other reasons#may have been more egalitarian. and we dont know due to erasure (either intentional or non-intentional)#both erasure and a fundamental inability of historians to comprehend it. similar to how cishet historians who cant fathom the idea of#transness or lesbianism talk about things.
6 notes · View notes
orc-apologist · 2 months
Text
it's funny how when you'll give actual explanations as to why people are racist or transphobic or something similar, like how that happens and why it's happening now out of all times, that go beyond "white people/cishet people evil" so many people will instantly attack you for "apologia"
I think it kinda comes from this idea that identity politics has pushed that people of the unmarked categories like male white and cishet can't possibly struggle with things in life. but economic crises, which we have been in for 16 years now, affect everyone that's not part of the ruling class. prolonged economic instability alienates people from the status quo, from established parties, rhetoric and such. they begin to look elsewhere for solutions. the powers that be know to counteract this with reactionary politics. using scapegoating they'll promise the return to an (often imaginary) better yesterday, the very definition of reactionary politics.
these ideas sound plausible and actionable. things used to be better after all. those scapegoats used to not be there (as visibly) after all.
the way of solving this isn't to go "waaahh people are evil and fascism is back, woe is me" but to a) point out that these reactionary politics are not going to solve the problem because they are not the cause b) point out the actual cause of the problem (capitalism) c) offer actual alternatives (organizing, strikes, expropriating the bourgeoisie, and eventually total labor democracy)
#and no fascism isn't back and it's not going to be back in most of the western world#there's a difference between a military or police dictatorship which is what the US might degenerate into under trump#and actual fascism#most of the things everyone points to as fascist aren't actually fascist they're just reactionary#even genocide isn't unique to fascism. israel for example is a liberal democracy and it's still committing genocide.#all you need for genocide is a class society. its political manifestation is irrelevant tho some forms are certainly easier to do a genocid#in#it's important to understand that so you have no illusions in liberal democracy which is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie#fascism isn't this generally evil society that we are constantly at the brink of falling back into#it was a very specific historical phenomenon#in which the petty bourgeoisie were used by totalitarian reactionaries as a battering ram against the working class#to violently suppress labor organization strikes and the potential downfall of capitalism and the rise of socialism#that was its role in germany italy and spain#it wouldn't work anymore today in the western world because the petty bourgeoisie has dwindled in numbers#as they are doomed to in the monopolization process of capitalist market anarchy#they are no longer a significant percentage of the population and no longer have the numbers to suppress the working class like that#because that's what differentiates fascism from a military dictatorship for example#a military dictatorship is a small group of people violently wrangling control of the state from its current holders#and abusing ALL of society for their personal gain. including the ruling class. marxists call this bonapartism#because napoleon bonaparte was the first to do so under capitalism#most importantly this means a military dictatorship does not have a mass base and relies on ruling by the sword#which makes it highly unstable and turns all of society against it#fascism was so dangerous because it DID have a mass base! the petty bourgeoisie!#vast amounts of them were in total support of fascist rule and actively pursued it. it wasn't just a small group of people.#this made the systems a lot more stable and a lot more powerful because they had large parts of society at their bidding#that sort of power and stability can no longer occur because their social base has mostly disappeared#they can whip up enough reactionary anger in the working class to perhaps GET to power#but as soon as a fascist politician starts going after unions strikes wages#launching the incredibly direct attacks against the working class that fascism always did#that voter base is going to turn against them very quickly
2 notes · View notes
identitty-dickruption · 10 months
Text
woah the gap between democratic support and democratic knowledge sure is gapping (concerned)
10 notes · View notes
animaginaryartblog · 10 months
Text
2 notes · View notes
the-fifteen · 11 months
Text
Seeing one of the blogs i follow for japanese art getting into LGBT discourse was something i was absolutely not expecting lmao
2 notes · View notes
Text
Spate of attacks leaves Brazilians on edge ahead of election
Violence against politicians and their supporters is on the rise in a campaign marred by harsh rhetoric
Tumblr media
A spate of brutal attacks has fuelled concerns of rising political violence in Brazil ahead of presidential elections next month.
Authorities are on alert following the murders in recent weeks of two supporters of race frontrunner, leftwing former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, by backers of incumbent rightwing leader Jair Bolsonaro.
The assailant shouted “here is Bolsonaro” as he shot an official from Lula’s Workers’ party (PT) in the first of the killings in July, according to police.
The assault followed the detonation of a homemade bomb packed with faeces at a campaign rally in Rio de Janeiro for the 76-year-old Lula, who leads polls by about 10 percentage points ahead of the first round vote on October 2.
Although no one was hurt in that incident, the attacks have fostered an atmosphere of insecurity, with both candidates eschewing the typical campaign trail camaraderie and abraços — hugs and embraces. Lula has used a bulletproof vest at events.
There were 214 recorded cases of violence against prominent politicians in Brazil during the first half of this year, according to the Observatory for Political and Electoral Violence at the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro.
That represents a more than fourfold increase since researchers began collecting data on the trend in 2019 at the start of Bolsonaro’s mandate. The group also found 40 homicides of politicians between January and June this year.
More than 67 per cent of voters, meanwhile, say they fear being attacked because of their political preferences, according to pollster Datafolha.
Continue reading.
9 notes · View notes
morgaussy · 1 year
Text
i am ill equipped to handle the notifications on the fucking bread poll lmao i have like 4 to 6 friends on this hellsite and all i want is to see their cute lil notes in the tags when they rb my trash 🥹
3 notes · View notes
the-busy-ghost · 2 years
Text
How does he fucking manage it
#Who the hell does he think he is#Yeah let's just block the debating of a motion of no confidence in the Prime Minister#A motion of no confidence the Tories were fully expected to win by the way#As usual the man in number 10 thinks he's above the rules and conventions that everybody else respects#And his team have found a loophole as ever so that he doesn't have to bother#The fucking GALL of the man#Nothing to gain except the further erosion of the conventions and traditions of British democracy#Or at least whatever passes for it nowadays#Unless they were really THAT scared of their own MPs voting against them#Tory whips say the motion fell outside normal convention because the PM was singled out#When exactly has this government EVER cared about convention#They are the poster children for 'Oh but it's not TECHNICALLY against the rules so it's OK'#Utterly blase#Call me old-fashioned but as much as I would like Scottish independence I think that those in Westminster#who claim to want to STAY in Westminster#Should observe the traditions and parliamentary conventions of that place#ESPECIALLY if their name is the 'conservative' party and they like to go on and on about British democracy#I could understand if they thought the rules needed changing but no they're just massive hypocrites who think the rules don't apply to them#Frankly disappointed that Lindsay Hoyle isn't hammering on the door of Number 10 with a horsewhip right now#But I suppose that wouldn't be in accordance with parliamentary convention either WHICH EVERYBODY ELSE HAS TO RESPECT#Except Boris apparently who thinks he's some kind of president#Government has way too much control over the house and its timetable but I understand that's the rules#However even if it IS their prerogative to deny time for the debate#Doesn't change the fact that if the Tories were (as thought) so likely to win the motion of no confidence#why have they been too cowardly to allow it to be debated#Chickens didn't want to be exposed as siding with Boris to their constituents but also wanted to stay in power
7 notes · View notes