#Impact of Project 2025 on U.S. workers

[justsaying4041]

Project 2025: Reforms Impacting U.S. Labor Rights

Project 2025, a comprehensive vision for future governance, proposes significant reforms to the U.S. Labor Department, aiming to overhaul workplace regulations, reduce bureaucratic oversight, and shift focus towards greater flexibility for employers. While proponents argue that these reforms will foster job creation, increase business competitiveness, and reduce government interference, there are…

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Amanda Becker at The 19th:

The U.S. Senate on Thursday approved Project 2025 architect Russell Vought to lead the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on a party-line vote after Democrats held the floor overnight in an attempt to delay the confirmation since they did not have the numbers to block it.  Vought was confirmed by a vote of 53-47. For 30 hours, starting on Wednesday afternoon and into Thursday evening, Democrats took turns on the Senate floor to protest Republican President Donald Trump’s nomination of Vought, who also led OMB at the tail end of Trump’s first administration. “This is really important, that we raise the alarm as to what is happening,” said Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, who spoke from 2-5 a.m., longer than most of his colleagues.  During his first stint at OMB, an under-the-radar entity that wields immense influence over the federal government by crafting the president’s budget, Vought helped Trump come up with a plan to jettison job protections for thousands of federal workers and assisted with a legally ambiguous effort to redirect congressionally appropriated foreign aid for Ukraine. In the years since, Vought founded two pro-Trump groups whose work has focused on discrediting structural racism and curtailing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. The chapter that Vought wrote for Project 2025 detailed how the budget agency could be used to withhold money appropriated by Congress and eliminate dissent within agencies by purging them of employees. Trump said repeatedly during his campaign that he had not read Project 2025 and did not know its authors, though at least 60 percent of its more than 350 contributors were linked to the president. These include appointees and nominees from his first administration, members of his prior transition team and unofficial advisers. Project 2025 is a 920-page roadmap from the conservative Heritage Foundation about how Trump’s second administration could use the federal government to enact a far-right Christian agenda. If implemented — and some of the Trump administration’s earliest moves track the blueprint’s objectives — it has the potential to redefine rights long held by all Americans, with disproportionate impacts for women, LGBTQ+ people, people of color and vulnerable populations like the elderly and disabled.

[...] Last week an OMB letter sent by acting director Matthew Vaeth instructing federal agencies to pause “all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance” sent shock waves across Washington. The White House moved to quell the backlash. A federal judge earlier this week issued a temporary restraining order, extending a pause on implementing the directive. 

US Senate confirms 53-47 along straight party lines to confirm Project 2025 architect Russ Vought to head up the OMB, reprising his role that he had in Trump’s 1st term.

[mariacallous]

As Election Day approaches, many city leaders across the United States are wondering what a second presidential term for Donald Trump might mean for their residents and communities. Over the past several months, they have watched as Trump described Milwaukee as “horrible,” New York as a “city in decline,” and Philadelphia as “ravaged by bloodshed and crime.” Trump recently warned (at the Detroit Economic Club, of all places) that “the whole country will be like Detroit” if Vice President Kamala Harris wins the election, and that “you’re going to have a mess on your hands.” City leaders recall conflicts with the previous Trump administration over issues such as administering the decennial census, ensuring public safety, and providing adequate funding. 

Immigration policy, however, should top their concerns. Candidate Trump signaled numerous ways in which he and his cabinet would seek to reduce the presence and impact of immigrants of nearly all kinds in American life. Recent Brookings analysis quantified the potential national economic impact of this agenda. And as the analysis below shows, these proposed policies would be especially harmful to cities, which have long relied upon immigration for critical demographic, economic, and cultural fuel. 

The GOP wants fewer immigrants—of almost all kinds—in the United States 

While Trump and running mate JD Vance’s recent spotlight on Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio grabbed headlines, the GOP’s agenda on immigration reaches much more broadly. Based on Trump’s speeches, statements from campaign officials, and Project 2025’s “Mandate for Leadership,” this agenda includes: 

Rounding up, detaining, and deporting an estimated 11 million unauthorized migrants 

Further restricting the entry of refugees and asylum seekers 

Repealing the diversity immigrant visa, which offers pathways to permanent U.S. residency for migrants from countries with historically low numbers of immigrants 

Limiting family-based admissions of immigrants (to nuclear family members only) 

Scaling back the use of H-1B (high-skilled immigrant) and H-2B (seasonal immigrant worker) visas 

Repealing temporary protected status (TPS) for immigrants fleeing unsafe situations in their home countries (including 450,000 recent arrivals from Venezuela) 

Ending Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) protections for minor children whose parents brought them to the U.S. illegally 

Reinstituting the “Muslim ban,” effectively barring the entry of individuals from a range of Muslim-majority countries 

Such policies would reflect Trump’s warning that immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of America, and fulfill promises from policy adviser Stephen Miller that a second Trump presidency “will unleash the vast arsenal of federal powers to implement the most spectacular migration crackdown.” As was true in the previous Trump administration, many (if not all) of these policies would face legal challenges, funding challenges, or both. But such a multipronged policy assault on immigration—likely coupled with continued anti-immigration rhetoric—would undoubtedly have both direct and indirect effects on immigrants’ presence and contributions to America’s economy and society. 

[milfstalin]

i wrote an off-the-cuff essay (1.4k words) inspired by speaking with a comrade about organizing in the u.s., would appreciate feedback or comments or anything:

The failure to organize is both a tactical and a moral one:

The failure of the American labor unions to call a general strike on behalf of Palestine or to meaningfully impede the U.S.-Israeli arms dependency speaks to the disorganization of the “left” (that is to say, a vague alliance of communists/anarchists/trade unionists/progressive factions) in general, with the most militant actions carried out by the anarchists being essentially acts of vandalism and occasional logistical disruptions but no real impact to the overall functioning of the military-industrial complex. As of one year since the start of Al-Aqsa Flood, which was a tactical, catastrophically successful strike to revive the movement for Palestinian statehood and to curb Israeli expansion into Palestinian lands, and to take advantage of U.S. distraction in the Ukraine, the Harris-Walz campaign is running on a platform in many ways that is identical to the GOP’s platform, while promising the very same flow of U.S. arms and intelligence to the settler-colony. With regards to imperialism, the two parties are exactly the same; they wish to reproduce it.

U.S. war goals for Israel and West Asia:

The U.S. government never intended for a ceasefire in Gaza because they saw the genocide as a golden opportunity to eliminate Hamas, the main militant resistance group against continuous Israeli oppression. “Ceasefire now” has become the “Defund the police” of 2023, a slogan overused and co-opted and defanged entirely. That the U.S. has also quietly encouraged Israel to invade Lebanon and extend the Palestinian genocide to them, in order to dismantle Hezbollah as both a political party and as a military force is unsurprising.

In short, the U.S.’s goal in West Asia is to have Israel win the war and utterly exterminate its enemies- from the organized parties who launch rockets at the colonial outposts to the Palestinian and Lebanese families who are crushed under buildings. That is because the alternative to Israel winning is Israel losing, and losing absolutely up to a complete collapse. Losing Israel means losing the most sophisticated U.S. military base on earth and a projection of imperial power, as well as a cudgel to use against the people of the region, and a way to ensure the smooth flow of oil with Israel used as a brandished weapon and thinly veiled threat against U.S.-client states.

Iran, after waiting precious months to buy time for a ceasefire deal, has now decided to up the ante and respond to constant Israeli provocations and to enter the field in support Hezbollah, who despite Israeli decapitation of its top leadership in apocalyptic bombings and terrorist attacks like the pager blasts remains coherent as a party and continues to fight. Al-Qassam fighters continue to emerge from rubble to attack platoons in Gaza, the West Bank remains vibrant with resistance, and the Yemeni Armed Forces have refused to give on up on Palestine even despite U.S. attempts at bribery. The popular cradle of armed resistance, just as it was in Vietnam and Algeria, consists of civilians who are forced to take up arms and fight against the imperialist invaders who wish to control and exterminate them. Each person killed results in ten more people picking up the gun to avenge the fallen. The only solution to end the violence is to end the colonial-imperial oppression.

Criticism of electoralism and the CPUSA:

The CPUSA, for all its cadres have done in their communities, has thrown its weight behind the Democrats in fear of the boogeyman of Project 2025, which the Dems have made no promises to counteract it. The CPUSA occupies an ineffective place between militant communist party and electoral worker’s party, rendering it ineffective at both and stranding it in no man’s land.  Line struggle within existing communist parties and dealing with their historical baggage may be an alternative option to organizing our own, but with a leadership as ossified as the CPUSA’s it seems pointless. Bringing back the revolutionary line might as well take as long as starting anew.

All this while Palestine and now Lebanon are subjected to genocide, while the media smears and defames the factions who try to stop the genocides. The PSL went for the moonshot in their own presidential campaign, but they were subjected to the same marginalization that has afflicted third-parties like the Greens. In short, 2024 is an election between two colors of genocide without any third option. And even if the PSL or Greens could win the presidency, they would find themselves immediately devoured by Capitol politics and either eliminated or absorbed into the bourgeois class that sponsors the mainstream parties.

If there is to be engagement with liberal electoralism, it must proceed in an organized, clear-minded manner, with attainable goals in mind, with concessions given over from the bourgeois parties before electing them to power. And these actions must be understood as only achieving a narrow window of political possibilities without changes to the underlying system of capitalism-imperialism.

Imperialism and organizing in the imperial core:

So, if we divest from engaging with the electoral process and the liberal parties, what do we do instead? The U.S.’s wealth and power come from the dollar and from imperialism; the exploitation of overseas labor means that the bourgeois do not have to listen to the demands of U.S. labor; in fact, the current labor unions bargain for scraps of the super-profits reaped by American corporations by their leveraging of “comparative advantage” i.e. socioeconomic underdevelopment due to historical colonialism and imperialism.

Why do we have access to cheap bananas year-round? Who grows and picks the coffee that ends up in Starbucks $6 lattes? How come we don’t have to worry about currency exchange rates or whether our savings will be devalued for reasons out of our control? These interrogations of our supply chain are essential to understanding how imperialism works. And yet, despite the massive benefits reaped by companies and the small luxuries given over to the working class American people, there is still homelessness, underemployment, healthcare debt, and all of the other ills that emerge from a society organized around maximizing profit and not fulfilling the needs of people. All this occurs on a background of settler-colonial genocide and continued indigenous extermination, and continued white supremacy and racial hierarchy.

Because imperialism makes it that domestic labor can be bribed or ignored, we must focus our attention to breaking the chains of imperialism itself. The American political economy is an ideological battleground unto itself, with anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist movements and states smeared as irrationally evil and anti-human, with the consent manufactured for war that is natural for a bourgeois government that wishes to perpetuate the current world-system of massive inequity and exploitation. The western imperialist proclaims cultural progressiveness and ideological supremacy, that it values women and LGBTQ+ people by bombing the places where they live and raping and looting the resources of their country, as if that was a valid excuse for genocide in the first place. Furthermore, one only needs to look around at home to see how much the U.S. actually values those groups.

Because even with imperial benefits the masses of American workers are still subject to capitalist exploitation, and that this exploitation plays out unevenly, based on racial and gender lines, we must organize to care for each other and to build dual power, that is to say, build a people’s power that cannot be taken away after a bad election cycle and eventually, a proletarian party to surpass and do what the existing ones cannot. The working class is not a homogenous one, and the differences in the masses can and has been exploited by bourgeois forces to great effect, but every worker shares the very same conditions for survival and therefore has a stake in the abolition of capitalism. When capitalism is overturned, only then can true attempts at reparations and societal justice be made at both the domestic and the international level.

Furthermore we must counter-propagandize against the bourgeois media who beat the drums of war, not with anti-war platitudes and liberal arguments, but from a materialist, anti-imperialist framework and with the goal of turning the war of the imperialists into a class war. Iran, China, and Russia are not threats to the American proletariat. We know our enemies and they are not across the ocean; the enemy is the bourgeois right at home who defiles stolen lands and permits genocide everywhere and reaps profits from the labor of the worldwide working class. To destroy the American bourgeois is to free the world entire. That is the historical mission of the American working class.

[rjzimmerman]

Excerpt from this story from The Revelator:

National parks and other protected areas around the world went from being understaffed to entirely neglected after the Trump administration abruptly froze foreign aid in January 2025. The announcement generated grim headlines from some of the world’s top news sites: “On the chopping block with USAID: Elephants, tigers, and reefs,” “Across the world, conservation projects reel after abrupt U.S. funding cuts,” and “Elephants and rhinos at increased risk of poaching due to Trump funding cuts,” to quote just a few.

For conservation biologists these stories were excruciating to read because we already knew that the survival of protected areas and the intensely persecuted species living in them depends on consistent patrolling by rangers and personnel. Funding interruptions of even a few months can open the floodgates for poachers, artisanal miners, and illegal loggers.

Ranger shortfalls, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and tropical Asia, heighten the probability and impacts of poaching, which disrupts ecosystems, erodes biocultural diversity, and diminishes wildlife tourism that benefits both local and global communities. But as the funding freezes spread into global consciousness, the media offered scant coverage on the links between at-risk species and the dearth of trained and equipped rangers in the affected regions.

As frontline defenders of imperiled ecosystems and species across the Earth, rangers are essential planetary healthcare workers. Before January 2025 U.S. government agencies recognized their importance and funded the development of ranger programs around the world. With support from USAID, the Southern African Wildlife College successfully trained hundreds of rangers to control wildlife trafficking in Zimbabwe, Mozambique, South Africa, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. A subset of the rangers received specialized training through the Braveheart Ranger Leadership Training Program, a curriculum designed to develop the necessary leadership and conflict resolution skills required to combat highly organized illegal wildlife trade. And in Asia the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Fund — which the U.S. Congress launched in 1994 — provided salaries for hundreds of rangers and supported the construction of several dozen ranger stations in western Thailand, laying the groundwork for some of Asia’s most spectacular tiger recoveries. Now, if you go to the Rhino Tiger Fund grant webpage, you’ll be met by a notification as solemn as upsetting: “In accordance with the Presidents Executive Order, Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid, this Notification of Funding Opportunity, F25AS00133, is currently suspended.”

These rangers — along with the programs and funding to train them — are desperately needed. A 2022 study estimated that the world’s protected areas employ about 286,000 rangers but need an estimated 1.25 million more to adequately defend wildlife.

[usafphantom2]

Georgia base tapped to host F-35 fighters as A-10 fleet retires

Rachel S. CohenJun 27 at 04:15 PM

Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, is the service’s top pick to become the next active duty home of the F-35A Lightning II fighter.

The Air Force said Monday it plans to bring two F-35 squadrons to the Valdosta base starting in fiscal 2029, when it hopes to complete phasing out its fleet of A-10C Thunderbolt II attack planes.

The service must first study the proposed move’s environmental impact on the surrounding area before formally green-lighting the project. That review is slated to finish in fall 2025.

Switching missions at Moody isn’t expected to create any new jobs on base, the Air Force said, although it had previously announced that the U.S.’s most advanced fighter jet would bring in another 500 or so workers.

It’s unclear what other bases were considered as part of the process.

Winding down much of America’s combat operations overseas has prompted a significant shift in Moody’s missions at home. For almost two decades, the base’s A-10s watched over ground troops and strafed enemy forces with the Warthog’s iconic, armor-piercing 30mm gun.

Moody airmen also flew search-and-rescue missions in Afghanistan since the early days of the U.S. invasion and trained Afghan pilots on the A-29 Super Tucano ground attack aircraft to build the country’s fledgling air force.

The Air Force’s plan to swap A-10s for F-35s at Moody is emblematic of the Pentagon’s pivot from its longtime War on Terror to instead focus on military competition with China.

The service argues that the Warthog fleet must be retired because it is ill-equipped to face off against advanced air defenses, stealth jets and the vast distances of the Pacific. Critics say the A-10 can perform the close air support mission far better than the F-35, which was designed as the high-tech “quarterback” of the battlefield rather than to hunt convoys.

Georgia lawmakers hailed the decision as a long-term investment in the region’s military community as the country’s priorities change.

“This is a major step forward in our ongoing effort to strengthen and sustain Moody Air Force Base for decades to come,” Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Georgia, said in a release Monday. “I will continue to champion Moody AFB and its future as a home for U.S. Air Force tactical aviation.”

“For decades Moody AFB has been key for our nation’s defense,” Republican Rep. Austin Scott, who represents the base’s district, said on Twitter. “I am pleased that Secretary Kendall has selected Moody as the preferred location for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Moody is proud to maintain a fighter mission, carrying its strong legacy long into the 21st century.”

Active duty F-35 units already handle test, training and combat operations from Edwards Air Force Base in California, Nellis AFB in Nevada, Luke AFB in Arizona, Hill AFB in Utah, Eglin AFB in Florida, Eielson AFB in Alaska and RAF Lakenheath in England. Three more squadrons will start arriving at Tyndall AFB, Florida, this summer.

In May, the service announced that the Oregon National Guard will likely host the Air Force’s third F-35A training squadron at Kingsley Field, pending an environmental study. The decision would bring 20 jets but no new jobs to the installation.

“The Air Force needs F-35 squadrons available and fully mission-capable to prevail against peer adversaries,” the Oregon Air National Guard’s 173rd Fighter Wing said in a release. “That means they require more F-35 pilots. Team Kingsley’s adaptability and excellence allows us to fill this Air Force need.”

The U.S. plans to purchase 2,470 F-35s overall, more than 1,700 of which will be flown by the Air Force. The jets remain the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons program, at more than $1.7 trillion to buy, operate and maintain, the Government Accountability Office said last year.

Rachel Cohen joined Air Force Times as senior reporter in March 2021. Her work has appeared in Air Force Magazine, Inside Defense, Inside Health Policy, the Frederick News-Post (Md.), the Washington Post, and others.

[unitedstatesrei]

Kansas City Lands 2M-Sq-Ft Amazon Park, Investors Flock

Amazon's $160 Million Distribution Center Creates 1,500 Jobs in Kansas City NorthlandAmazon has unveiled a significant $160 million investment for a new distribution center in Kansas City's Northland. This development is set to transform the region's logistics landscape.The facility, spanning 630,000 square feet and code-named "Project Falcon," will introduce up to 1,500 jobs at full capacity.Situated in KCI 29 Logistics Park, it marks one of the largest industrial investments in Kansas City in recent years.The initial phase of the project will create 800 positions, with potential for expansion to full operational capacity.State and local leaders support this project for its potential to boost economic growth in the metropolitan area.Development began early in 2025.Permits for mass grading and road enhancements were issued in mid-December, just before the project's formal announcement.The center will feature Amazon's "Amazon Prime Blue" building colors and advanced Vanderlande Industries material handling equipment.A 20-year tax exemption highlights the municipality's commitment to sustainable economic development. The project is expected to have significant impacts across multiple business sectors, similar to coverage areas that include accounting, banking, finance, and construction.Strategic Location Positions Kansas City as Midwest Logistics Hub for Major E-commerce PlayersThe massive distribution center investment is just one part of Kansas City's rise as the Midwest's leading logistics hub.The region's strategic location near the U.S. population center offers unmatched logistics benefits for e-commerce giants aiming for market expansion.Kansas City's central position allows for faster final-mile delivery while significantly lowering transportation costs across major Midwest and national markets.The city serves as a natural crossroads where major highways, rail lines, and air transport facilities intersect.Key infrastructure developments further enhance these benefits.Logistics Park Kansas City offers direct BNSF Railway access to warehouses, enabling smooth rail-to-truck transfers.The KCI Intermodal BusinessCentre connects air cargo operations through Kansas City International Airport, ideal for time-sensitive shipments.Container trade activities strengthen the region's logistics dominance.Kansas City ranks as the second-largest Midwest center for container exports, securing an 11 percent market share.Import container volumes have increased at a five percent compounded annual growth rate.This growth surpasses regional competitors, establishing Kansas City as the unavoidable Midwest logistics epicenter. The region's warehouse labor force of 42,801 workers provides the skilled workforce necessary to support these expanding operations.Tax Incentives and Government Support Drive Amazon's 13th Regional Facility DevelopmentAt full operational capacity, the distribution center will bring up to 1,500 jobs to the local economy. This marks Amazon's most significant logistics footprint in the metro area since entering the market in 2014.Port KC provided a crucial advantage through a 20-year real property tax exemption package. This supports Amazon's $160 million investment in Project Falcon.The economic incentives also feature extensive sales tax exemptions on construction materials. These benefits position Kansas City ahead of competing markets.Government agencies facilitated a swift development process with streamlined permitting. Mass grading and road improvements at the warehouse site were prioritized.City officials also processed preliminary project code reviews for material handling equipment installations. Automation specialist Vanderlande Industries secured the systems contract.The aggressive incentive structure underscores intense regional competition among Midwest markets. They are all vying for major distribution facilities.While tax exemptions reduce immediate government revenue, economic development officials see long-term benefits.

Amazon's expanded regional presence promises future growth.The facility marks Amazon's 13th known location in the metro area. This further consolidates the company's Midwest distribution network.Infrastructure Investments Transform KCI 29 Logistics Park Into Prime Distribution DestinationWhile government incentives secured Amazon's commitment, massive infrastructure investments at KCI 29 Logistics Park have created the operational backbone that transforms this development into a premier distribution destination.The 20-million-square-foot megasite features transmission-level electrical power infrastructure. Additionally, it boasts extensive utility systems designed specifically for large-scale operations.Strategic infrastructure upgrades include direct highway access to I-29 and I-435 via the Mexico City Avenue interchange. This positions the facility within reach of 50,000 daily vehicle passages.Adjacent to Kansas City International Airport's cargo operations, the development maximizes logistics efficiency through multimodal shipping capabilities. These capabilities span air, rail, and road networks.On-site transmission waterlines and wastewater treatment facilities support the projected 45,000 daily truck movements at full build-out.Recent suburban growth and lifestyle demands in the region, similar to those supporting developments like the Mission Gateway project, enhance the strategic value of the logistics park.The first infrastructure phase completed in Fall 2023. The next phase targets completion by the end of 2025.These infrastructure investments position Missouri's largest industrial megasite as a critical component in Kansas City's transformation. It aims to become America's next logistics epicenter.AssessmentAmazon's massive Kansas City investment marks a significant shift in Midwest logistics dominance. The 2-million-square-foot facility establishes the region as a pivotal distribution hub for major e-commerce operations.Government incentives and strategic infrastructure investments have played a crucial role in attracting capital to the area.Real estate investors are under increased pressure to secure positions in these emerging logistics corridors. Institutional competition is expected to intensify further across secondary markets.

[creconsult]

Chicago rental market 2025: Why rents are soaring

Picture kicking off a morning jog along Lake Michigan, feeling the rising pulse of a metropolis in flux. Who could have guessed the Chicago rental market in 2025 would become one of the hottest in the nation, outpacing even our coastal cousins? In 2025, Windy City’s often-overlooked neighborhoods and skyscrapers alike are turning heads—and wallets—as demand surges, new construction slows, and investors scramble to get in on the action. If you think you know Chicago’s rental story, think again. Let’s peel back the layers behind the numbers, quirks, and untold stories shaping this city’s rental renaissance. Population Surges and Surprises in the Chicago Rental Market 2025 Chicago’s apartment market is experiencing a remarkable shift, driven by a surge in population and a changing renter profile. Over the last two years, the city welcomed more than 100,000 new residents. This influx has supercharged housing demand and put significant pressure on the Chicago apartment market, leading to some of the lowest vacancy rates the city has seen in years. What’s fueling this boom? A closer look reveals that many of these newcomers are younger professionals and remote workers. The Chicago rental market in 2025 benefits from the city’s relative affordability, especially compared to coastal cities. For those priced out of New York or San Francisco, the Windy City offers a compelling mix of urban amenities and manageable rent. The impact on the rental market has been immediate and dramatic. In the six months leading up to the first quarter of 2025, net absorption exceeded 7,300 units—outpacing the number of new apartments delivered during the same period. This rapid uptake has left many would-be renters scrambling. In fact, it’s not uncommon to hear stories of renters being outbid on multiple apartments, even in neighborhoods that once favored tenants. Edgewater, for example, has seen fierce competition. Across the city, vacancy rates are dropping sharply. Of Chicago’s 20 tracked submarkets, 10 posted triple-digit basis-point declines in vacancy over the past year. Hotspots like Aurora, the Far Northwest, and the Loop-West Loop-Fulton Market are seeing especially tight conditions. Both Class A apartments and Class C apartments are benefiting from this demand surge. Class A vacancy fell by 110 basis points to 5.0%, while Class C vacancy dropped to just 3.2%—the lowest among major Midwest markets. Rent growth is robust across the board, with Class A properties seeing a 6.8% increase and Class C properties up 4.4%. What’s more, the supply pipeline is tightening. With only 4,200 new units expected to come online in 2025—a nearly 50% drop from the decade average—competition for available apartments in the Chicago rental market in 2025 is likely to intensify. This limited supply, combined with strong demand, is expected to keep vacancy rates low and rents on an upward trajectory throughout the year. Rent Growth & Competitive Leasing in the Chicago Rental Market 2025 Chicago’s rental market is making headlines for all the right reasons. In 2025, the city is leading the nation in rent growth, outpacing traditional hotspots like New York and Los Angeles. The average effective rent in Chicago jumped by 5.5% year-over-year, a figure that stands out among major U.S. metros. This growth spans all segments of the Chicago rental market in 2025. Class A rents climbed 6.8%, while Class C apartments posted a 4.4% increase. Even Schaumburg saw its average rent rise by 7.6%, and suburbs like South Cook County posted gains as well. The citywide average effective rent is projected to reach $2,160 per month this year. Construction Slowdown & the Chicago Investment Shift Chicago’s multifamily market is entering a new era in 2025, shaped by a dramatic construction slowdown and a surge in local investment. According to recent supply forecasts, only 4,200 new apartment units are expected this year—about 50% below the city’s average over the past decade. This lack of new supply is reshaping the Chicago rental market in 2025.

As demand remains strong, local investors are targeting affordable, smaller properties in peripheral submarkets. Class C walk-ups on Chicago’s South Side are seeing increased activity thanks to high yields and relative affordability. Rent Control Uncertainty in the Chicago Rental Market 2025 While rents climb at a record pace, the threat of rent control remains a wild card. Though currently prohibited in Illinois, rising costs are sparking renewed calls for regulation. Investors and residents alike are keeping an eye on how policy shifts could affect the Chicago rental market in 2025.   Sources: National Multifamily Housing Council, City of Chicago Housing Department

[foodandbeverages]

Mezcal Market Segmentation Application, Technology & Market Analysis Research Report To 2035

The global mezcal market is on a strong upward trajectory, projected to expand from USD 640 million in 2025 to USD 1.3 billion by 2035, registering a CAGR of 7.4% during the forecast period. This growth is primarily fueled by increasing consumer interest in artisanal, small-batch, and premium spirits, driven by changing taste preferences, global cocktail culture, and rising disposable incomes in emerging economies. Mezcal, a traditional Mexican spirit distilled from various agave species (excluding blue agave), is deeply rooted in cultural heritage and artisanal craftsmanship. While Oaxaca remains the epicenter of production, the beverage is gaining worldwide traction, particularly in the U.S., Canada, Japan, and across Europe. The surge in demand has led to the emergence of several craft distilleries globally, underscoring a larger trend toward premiumization and authenticity in the alcoholic beverages market. Your Guide to Market Intelligence – Download a Sample Copy: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sample/rep-gb-5067 Craft and Premium Mezcal Leading Market Expansion The increasing demand for premium artisanal mezcal is shaping the future of the global market. Consumers, especially millennials and Gen Z, are opting for small-batch, craft distilleries that emphasize heritage, transparency, and authenticity. Craft mezcal sales in the United States have experienced a noticeable uptick, fueled by growing awareness of the Oaxacan mezcal production tradition and the unique characteristics of agave varietals. As a result, top mezcal brands driving market growth are focusing on storytelling, regional identity, and traditional distillation techniques that appeal to conscious consumers. The demand for organic mezcal is also on the rise, with producers investing in sustainable agave farming and eco-friendly packaging innovations to strengthen their brand positioning. Changing Consumer Preferences and Market Dynamics Consumers are increasingly drawn to the differences between mezcal and tequila, appreciating mezcal’s smoky character and artisanal production process. The growing consumer preference trends for mezcal over tequila indicate a broader shift toward unique, experiential drinking options. Moreover, the impact of sustainability on mezcal production is becoming a central theme. Brands are adopting regenerative agriculture, limiting overharvesting of wild agave, and improving worker welfare. These measures resonate with modern consumers who are prioritizing sustainability, origin transparency, and ethical production. Competitive Landscape and Strategic Developments The competitive landscape of key mezcal manufacturers is marked by strategic partnerships, innovation in branding, and diversification of product portfolios. Several producers are launching flavored variants, limited editions, and celebrity-endorsed mezcal products to attract younger demographics and enter new markets. Meanwhile, regulations continue to evolve. The impact of regulatory changes on mezcal labeling and denomination of origin standards is prompting companies to invest in certification and traceability systems. This shift aims to protect cultural heritage and ensure authenticity in the face of rising global demand.

[enterprisewired]

Social Security at 90: America’s Safety Net Faces Funding and Demographic Pressures

Source: incharge.org

As Social Security celebrates its 90th anniversary, the program remains one of the most significant and far-reaching functions of the U.S. government. With nearly every working American contributing through payroll taxes and over 55 million retirees receiving benefits, it serves as a vital lifeline for older adults, the disabled, and survivors. Beyond retirement, the Social Security Administration (SSA) also handles the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, assisting more than 7.4 million low-income individuals.

Despite its popularity, 79% of Americans in a 2024 Pew survey oppose benefit cuts. Social Security is confronting multiple headwinds. Chief among them is a projected depletion of the retirement trust fund by 2033. The SSA has also seen staff reductions under the Trump administration, with its workforce shrinking to just over 58,000 employees in 2024. These constraints are reportedly impacting its ability to efficiently manage benefits and claims for millions of Americans.

How Social Security Operates and Who It Serves

Social Security is primarily funded through a 12.4% payroll tax, split evenly between employees and employers, or paid in full by self-employed individuals. Most of this revenue, 85.5%, supports retirement and survivor benefits, while the remaining 14.5% goes toward disability payments. In 2023, nearly 183 million Americans, roughly 93% of the workforce, contributed to the system. Social Security also generates income through Treasury bond interest and taxation of some benefits, accumulating a total of $1.35 trillion in 2023.

As of April 2025, 73.9 million Americans were receiving benefits from at least one SSA program. This includes 52.6 million retirees, 7.2 million disabled workers, and 5.8 million survivors, among others. Notably, 86.9% of Americans over 65 and 92.6% of those over 75 received some form of Social Security benefit in 2022. On average, a retired worker received $1,999.97 in April 2025. That year, total annual payments reached $1.38 trillion, 22.5% of all federal spending.

Many Americans depend heavily on these benefits: in 2022, 63.2% of adult beneficiaries relied on Social Security for at least half their income, while 27% depended on it exclusively. While the program reduces senior poverty, only 7.8% of recipients lived below the poverty line compared to 9.7% of nonrecipients. SSI recipients face greater hardship, with one-third living in poverty.

Demographic Shifts and the Road Ahead

Social Security operates on a pay-as-you-go model, meaning current workers fund today’s beneficiaries. However, demographic trends are tipping this balance. In 1965, four workers supported each beneficiary; by 2023, that number dropped to 2.7. Projections estimate just 2.1 workers per beneficiary by century’s end, straining the system further.

Since 2021, the retirement program has paid out more than it collects, using reserves from the trust fund to cover the gap. The retirement trust fund peaked at $2.82 trillion in 2017 and fell to $2.5 trillion by 2024. Depending on economic trends, it could be depleted as early as 2031, though 2033 remains the most likely date. If no reforms are made, incoming revenue would only cover about 79% of scheduled benefits post-depletion.

To avert this, lawmakers could consider changes such as raising payroll taxes, increasing the taxable earnings cap, adjusting retirement age, or modifying cost-of-living formulas. Yet any move to reduce benefits faces stiff public resistance, with eight in ten Americans expressing opposition to cuts. The path forward will demand difficult political decisions to ensure Social Security’s sustainability for future generations.

Visit Enterprise Wired for the Most Recent Information.

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Erin Reed at Erin In The Morning:

In the early 1950s, a moral panic over gay people swept across America. LGBTQ+ individuals were cast as threats—vulnerable to blackmail, labeled “deviant sex perverts,” and accused of colluding with communist governments. Senator Joseph McCarthy, infamous for the Red Scare, pressured President Eisenhower into signing an executive order purging LGBTQ+ people from government service. With that signature, the campaign escalated rapidly—up to 10,000 federal employees were fired or forced to resign during what became known as the Lavender Scare, a far less taught but even more devastating purge than the Red Scare. The episode remains a lasting stain on U.S. history. And now, it appears we are witnessing its revival: 100 intelligence officials were just fired for participating in an LGBTQ+ support group chat—an internal network not unlike employee resource groups (ERGs) at most companies.

The firings stem from out-of-context chat logs leaked by far-right commentator Chris Rufo on Monday. Sources tell Erin in the Morning that the chat functioned as an ERG-adjacent LGBTQ+ safe space, where participants discussed topics like gender-affirming surgery, hormone therapy, workplace LGBTQ+ policies, and broader queer issues. Rufo, however, framed these conversations as evidence of misconduct, claiming that “NSA, CIA, and DIA employees discuss genital castration” and alleging discussions of “fetishes, kink, and sex.” To Rufo and his audience, merely talking about being transgender and the realities of transition is enough to be labeled “fetish” content. Eisenhower and McCarthy would have killed for such an easily accessible list of LGBTQ+ federal employees—and the flimsy pretext to purge them.

Within a day of the chat logs’ release, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced that all participants in the “obscene, pornographic, and sexually explicit” chatroom would be terminated. As of today, The New York Times reports that at least 100 members of the ERG-adjacent LGBTQ+ chat have been fired. The Times further notes that Gabbard is being briefed on “other inappropriate activity” elsewhere, signaling the potential for an even broader crackdown on LGBTQ+—and especially transgender—employees in the federal government. What we have just witnessed is the beginning of an LGBTQ+ purge in government, with a particular focus on transgender employees. Pride ERG chats and LGBTQ+ support groups are commonplace in workplaces across the United States, including within federal agencies. These spaces function not just as forums for discussing policy, lifestyle, and identity, but as de facto lists of LGBTQ+ employees—workers who join to stay informed, find community, and access support. The same mechanism used to justify this mass firing can be weaponized across any branch of government. If merely discussing gender-affirming care is deemed “obscene,” then every LGBTQ+ workplace chat could serve as pretext for an even broader purge.

This was heavily telegraphed in the lead-up to the 2024 election. Project 2025 explicitly aimed to define transgender people as obscene, and now, that agenda is taking shape. If Rufo can convince the public that transgender people merely discussing their medical care or LGBTQ+ people discussing sexual health constitutes obscene, fireable content, it’s easy to see this logic expanding into other areas of government or even into the public sphere. These same arguments have already been used to justify book bans against Gender Queer, drag bans, and broader censorship efforts. Now, Rufo is leveraging the Republican Party’s manufactured disgust toward transgender people to target all LGBTQ+ individuals in government—and beyond. This is to say nothing of the real-world impact of purging so many trans and queer intelligence officials.

Lavender Scare 2.0 is coming to the federal government, as DNI Secretary Tulsi Gabbard fired 100+ people for being in an LGBTQ+ support group chat at the urging of anti-LGBTQ+ extremist Christopher Rufo. This is the beginning of purges of LGBTQ+ people from the federal government.

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Brazil Finance Ministry sees deflationary potential from Trump policies

Officials still expecting inflation in Brazil to only reach target center only by 2027

Brazil’s Secretary of Economic Policy at the Ministry of Finance, Guilherme Mello, stated on Monday (19) that certain elements suggest the inflationary impact of the United States’ trade policy may be positive for Brazil. He also denied that the new payroll-deductible credit for formal workers, the expansion of the Minha Casa, Minha Vida (MCMV) program, and potential new credit policies under consideration by the federal government have an inflationary bias.

Nonetheless, the ministry projects that prices will only converge to the center of the target in 2027. “The sum of the factors presents a deflationary bias, at least in the current scenario,” Mr. Mello said during a press conference to discuss the Macrofiscal Bulletin, a document outlining the Ministry of Finance’s main economic projections for 2025 and 2026.

In the interview, Mr. Mello cited two main external factors that “have the potential to prospectively improve” the inflation outlook in Brazil: the decline in commodity prices and the appreciation of the real against the dollar. Additionally, China’s new trade policy in response to tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump could “bring cheaper goods and services to Latin America.”

Regarding the impact of recently implemented or studied credit measures by the federal government, the Secretary stated that “there are many other much more important things happening in the world...It seems that the problem is this specific public policy, when it is not,” he said.

Continue reading.

[24chemicalresearch]

Methanoic Acid Market Size, Demand & Supply, Regional and Competitive Analysis 2025–2032

Market Size

The global Methanoic Acid (Formic Acid) market was valued at USD 625.4 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 910.8 million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 4.8% during the forecast period.

Methanoic acid, also known as formic acid, is a colorless, pungent liquid with strong acidic properties. It is primarily used as a preservative and antibacterial agent in livestock feed, as well as in leather processing, textiles, rubber production, and as an intermediate in various chemical syntheses. Its increasing industrial applications, coupled with demand in agriculture and leather industries, are propelling market growth globally.

Market Dynamics (Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Challenges)

👉 Download a free Sample Report PDF: https://www.24chemicalresearch.com/download-sample/289382/global-methanoic-acid-forecast-market-2025-2032-649

Drivers:

Growing Demand from Agriculture: Widespread use of formic acid as a silage preservative and animal feed additive supports market growth.

Expansion of Leather and Textile Industries: The compound is used in tanning and dyeing processes, particularly in developing countries.

Eco-Friendly Nature: Biodegradable and less toxic than many other acids, formic acid is increasingly preferred in various industrial processes.

Restraints:

Health Hazards and Handling Risks: Being corrosive, improper handling poses risks to workers and limits use in small-scale industries.

Availability of Substitutes: Alternatives such as acetic acid in certain applications can reduce dependency on methanoic acid.

Opportunities:

Emerging Applications in Renewable Energy: Increasing use in hydrogen storage and fuel cells.

Growing Demand from Asia-Pacific: Rapid industrialization and livestock farming expansion in the region present key growth opportunities.

Challenges:

Volatile Raw Material Prices: The cost of raw materials like methanol impacts production economics.

Environmental Regulations: Strict controls on emissions and chemical disposal may increase compliance costs for producers.

Regional Analysis

North America: Moderate growth driven by demand in agriculture and chemical intermediates. The U.S. remains a key consumer.

Europe: Strict environmental norms encourage the use of eco-friendly chemicals like methanoic acid.

Asia-Pacific: The fastest-growing market with significant consumption in China and India due to expanding leather, textile, and agriculture sectors.

Latin America: Increased livestock farming and chemical production contribute to gradual market growth.

Middle East & Africa: Demand driven by tanning, textiles, and agrochemical use in emerging economies.

Competitor Analysis (in brief)

Prominent players in the global Methanoic Acid market include:

BASF SE

Perstorp Group

LUXI Group Co., Ltd.

Eastman Chemical Company

Feicheng Acid Chemicals Co., Ltd.

Qiaochang Chemical Co., Ltd.

Shandong Yuanli Science and Technology Co., Ltd.

Taminco Corporation

Helm AG

Anhui Asahi Kasei Chemical Co., Ltd.

These companies focus on expanding production capacities, geographic reach, and application diversification to gain a competitive edge.

Global Methanoic Acid Market Segmentation Analysis

The report provides a detailed analysis of market segments by type, application, and geography to identify trends and growth opportunities.

By Type:

Dilute Methanoic Acid (≤85%)

Concentrated Methanoic Acid (>85%)

By Application:

Agriculture (Silage & Animal Feed)

Leather & Textile

Rubber & Latex Coagulation

Chemical Intermediates

Pharmaceuticals

Others

Geographic Segmentation:

North America

Europe

Asia-Pacific

Middle East & Africa

Latin America

FAQs

1. What is the projected market size of the Methanoic Acid market by 2032? The global Methanoic Acid market is projected to reach USD 910.8 million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 4.8% during the forecast period.

2. Which industries drive the demand for Methanoic Acid? Major industries include agriculture (as silage and feed additive), leather, textiles, rubber, pharmaceuticals, and chemical manufacturing.

3. What are the major challenges faced by the Methanoic Acid market? Challenges include handling hazards due to corrosiveness, fluctuating raw material prices, and increasing environmental and regulatory compliance costs.

👉 Get The Complete Report & TOC: https://www.24chemicalresearch.com/reports/289382/global-methanoic-acid-forecast-market-2025-2032-649

👉 Follow us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/24chemicalresearch

[mordorintelligencemarketresearch]

Steady Growth Ahead for U.S. Residential Construction Market Despite Headwinds  

Steady Growth Ahead for U.S. Residential Construction Market Despite Headwinds  

The U.S. residential construction market is poised for steady growth through 2030, despite facing challenges such as high interest rates, labor shortages, and material cost inflation. According to Mordor Intelligence, the market is projected to register a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 3% during the forecast period. 

Market Overview 

The U.S. residential construction sector encompasses both single-family and multi-family housing units, including new constructions and renovations. Major urban centers like New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Washington D.C., and Miami are focal points for development activities. 

In 2020, the federal funds rate was lowered to near zero in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to historically low mortgage rates. This, coupled with a low housing supply, fueled residential construction during that period. However, the pandemic's economic impact led to temporary shutdowns, affecting residential investments in the second quarter of 2020. Despite these challenges, the residential market rebounded rapidly, with investment values surpassing pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2020. 

Key Market Trends 

Interest Rates and Mortgage Trends: The National Association of Realtors forecasts that the U.S. 30-year fixed-rate mortgage will average around 6.0% in 2025. This stabilization is expected to enhance new housing construction and increase demand for existing homes. 

Supply Chain and Material Costs: High mortgage rates and new tariffs, including a 145% duty on Chinese imports and a 25% levy on foreign steel and aluminum, have increased home construction costs by approximately $10,900 per unit, according to the National Association of Homebuilders. 

Labor Market Dynamics: The construction industry's dependence on undocumented workers makes it particularly vulnerable to immigration enforcement, adding further risks to an already stressed market. Worries about immigration enforcement officers taking away construction crews "creates more of the risk that the following day a couple siding crews don't show up," said Kurt Yinger, a vice-president at DA Davidson. 

Urban Development and Adaptive Reuse: Urban centers are witnessing a strategic shift, with former office spaces being repurposed into residential units. This trend addresses housing shortages and revitalizes urban areas, showcasing a creative solution to the region's housing crisis . 

Competitive Landscape 

The U.S. residential construction market is characterized by low market concentration, with several key players operating nationwide. Major companies include D.R. Horton, Lennar Corporation, PulteGroup, Greystar Worldwide, and Alliance Residential . These firms are actively engaging in strategic initiatives to expand their market presence and address the evolving demands of the housing sector. 

Future Outlook 

Despite current challenges, the U.S. residential construction market is expected to experience steady growth through 2030. Factors such as favorable mortgage rates, urban redevelopment initiatives, and increasing demand for housing units are anticipated to drive market expansion. However, stakeholders must navigate ongoing issues related to labor availability, material costs, and regulatory changes to capitalize on emerging opportunities. 

For a more detailed analysis, you can refer to the full report by Mordor Intelligence: US Residential Construction Market Analysis.

[realestatewithtili]

Is Houston Still a Good Place to Invest in Real Estate in 2025?

The answer isn’t a simple yes or no, it depends on your strategy, goals, and timing. But one thing is clear: Houston continues to show strong signs of being a high-potential, dynamic real estate market with plenty of opportunity for savvy investors.

A Resilient and Growing Economy

Houston’s economy has always played a major role in its real estate landscape. In 2025, the city is showing resilience, bolstered by growth in multiple sectors including energy, healthcare, technology, and aerospace. The city has successfully diversified its economy beyond oil and gas, which makes it more attractive to job seekers and, in turn, real estate investors.

A strong economy means a steady influx of workers, and workers need places to live. The ongoing job growth brings a continuous demand for rental properties, particularly in areas close to major employers like the Texas Medical Center, downtown business district, and the expanding Energy Corridor.

Population Growth and Housing Demand

Houston remains one of the fastest-growing metro areas in the country. According to current projections, the city’s population is expected to grow steadily through the decade. More people mean more demand for homes, both for purchase and for rent. For investors, this means strong rental yields and long-term appreciation potential.

Neighborhoods like Cypress, Katy, Pearland, and Spring are seeing significant new construction and family migration, while areas like Midtown, EaDo (East Downtown), and The Heights are popular among young professionals and renters. These micro-markets each offer different investment potential depending on the type of tenant or buyer you’re targeting.

Home Prices Remain Reasonable Compared to Other Cities

Even with rising demand, Houston remains relatively affordable compared to other major U.S. cities like Austin, Dallas, Los Angeles, or New York. This price advantage creates room for value-added investments, such as flipping or adding short-term rental properties. Investors looking to enter the market without breaking the bank will find more flexible entry points in Houston than in many comparable metros.

Also, Houston’s no-zoning laws make it a bit more flexible for development and creative real estate use. This flexibility can be a major win for investors with an eye on redevelopment or mixed-use projects.

Rental Market and Cash Flow Potential

The rental market in Houston continues to thrive in 2025, with strong demand across the board. Young professionals, students, and families alike are driving demand for everything from high-rise apartments in downtown to single-family rentals in the suburbs. Rents have remained steady or have even risen in many neighborhoods, offering consistent cash flow potential for landlords.

If you’re considering short-term rentals (like Airbnb), proximity to key attractions like the Texas Medical Center, NRG Stadium, or Minute Maid Park can significantly boost occupancy rates. Just make sure to stay updated on local regulations, as short-term rental laws are evolving.

Challenges to Keep in Mind

Of course, no market is without its challenges. Rising interest rates in 2025 may impact your financing options and reduce overall affordability. The ongoing issue of property taxes in Texas — which can be higher compared to other states — also needs to be factored into your investment calculations.

Additionally, Houston’s exposure to natural disasters, particularly flooding and hurricanes, means that investors need to be diligent about insurance, location, and property inspections. Properties located within floodplains or older homes with outdated infrastructure may present hidden costs if not thoroughly vetted.

So, Is Houston a Good Investment in 2025?

If you’re looking for strong population growth, economic resilience, relatively affordable property, and high rental demand, then Houston checks all the boxes. The key is choosing the right location and the right investment strategy, whether that’s long-term rentals, short-term rentals, fix-and-flips, or multifamily properties.

With continued development, growing job markets, and a culture that attracts newcomers from around the world, Houston remains a solid choice for both new and seasoned real estate investors.