#Jean Pierre Faye | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

hedgehog-moss · 1 year

Note

do you ever read scifi or fantasy in french? i am trying to read more sff that was originally published not in english but it's not easy to find 💀

I do! It’s not my favourite genre but one of my friends loves it so I read a bunch of SFF books every year ahead of her birthday to try and find a gift for her. I’m glad I do this because it’s allowed me to discover N.K. Jemisin’s Broken Earth trilogy which was amazing, and I don’t know if I would have picked it up otherwise!

Here are some French-language authors I’ve read or plan to read (unfortunately English translations are few and far between :( I bolded the names for which I found English translations—if you read in another language you can check out the non-bolded authors, there are often translations available in other languages long before English ones)

When it comes to classics you've got Pierre Boulle (Planet of the Apes of course; also Garden on the Moon, which is (deservedly imo) less known), Jacques Spitz (La Guerre des mouches—it was translated but not into English), René Barjavel (The Ice People, Ravage, Future Times Three—I read them a long time ago but I remember them as very sexist even by French classic standards), Bernard Lenteric (La nuit des enfants rois), Alain Damasio (La Horde du Contrevent—maybe too recent to be a classic but it’s everywhere. I was surprised to find no English translation!), Bernard Werber (I feel like he rehashes the same 3 ideas again and again but some of his earlier stuff was fun), Alexandre Arnoux (Le règne du bonheur), Jules Verne of course, Stefan Wul (Oms en série which was adapted into the film La Planète sauvage—Fantastic Planet in English. I like the film better!) And some I haven’t read: Georges-Jean Arnaud, Serge Brussolo (I liked his Peggy Sue series when I was in middle school but it spooked me so much I haven’t dared to pick up any of his SFF for adults, like Les semeurs d’abîmes), Élisabeth Vonarburg.

Newer authors: Estelle Faye (L’arpenteuse de rêves, Un éclat de givre—I tend to like her worldbuilding more than her plots); Sandrine Collette (The Forests—if you count speculative fiction as SFF) (I didn’t like it at all personally but others might), Jean-Philippe Jaworski (I really liked Janua Vera; didn't like Gagner la guerre but it was mainly because I have a low tolerance for rape scenes in fantasy books) (he’s about to be translated into English according to his editor), Stéphane Beauverger (Le déchronologue)

More authors I haven't yet read: Pierre Pevel (The Cardinal's Blades—I've been told it's "17th century Paris with dragons"), Romain Lucazeau (Latium), Laurent Genefort (Lum’en), Christian Charrière (La forêt d’Iscambe), Roland Wagner (La saison de la sorcière), Aurélie Wellenstein (Mers Mortes—I love the synopsis for this one), Magali Villeneuve (La dernière Terre, trilogy)

And non-French, non-anglo SFF authors: Maryam Petrosyan (my review of the Gray House last year was that I understood maybe 1/3 of it but I liked it anyway!), Hao Jingfang (haven’t read her yet), Arkady & Boris Strugatsky (idem), Jaroslav Melnik (I’ve read Espace lointain (originally Далекий простір) but didn’t like it much), Andreas Eschbach (The Carpet Makers), Walter Moers (I read The City of Dreaming Books back when I was still learning German and found it very charming), Liu Cixin (I loved The Three-Body Problem but The Dark Forest was so sexist it made me not want to pick up the third volume), Lola Robles (El informe Monteverde, translated as Memoirs of an Interstellar Linguist), Elaine Vilar Madruga (Fragmentos de la Tierra Rota), Tatiana Tolstaya (The Slynx), Karin Tidbeck (Amatka), Emmi Itäranta (Memory of Water, The Moonday Letters), Angélica Gorodischer (I’ve read Kalpa Imperial and found it only so-so but it always takes me a while to warm up to characters or a setting so I struggle with short story collections. I’ll still give Trafalgar a try) Also my favourite fantasy book as a kid was Michael Ende’s Neverending Story, I was obsessed with it. I re-read it in the original German a few years ago and it was still great.

#ask #book recs #i feel like sff has long had a poor reputation in france. like it's seen as 'not real literature'#not necessarily by readers but by literary awards and mainstream outlets that promote books #the genre doesn't get a lot of attention from those so it's hard for authors to become well-known #it's often seen as a genre for kids and teenagers—i know i had an easier time finding sff books by french authors when i was younger #scifi for primary school kids like christian lamblin's le survivant or philippe ebly's space operas in bibliothèque verte #or sff for middle school kids: the peggy sue series; linus hoppe by a-l bondoux; more recently the nuées series by nathalie bernard #but yeah in the adult sff aisle of nonspecialised bookshops it's mostly anglo authors + always the same handful of french ones

370 notes · View notes

blackswaneuroparedux · 1 year

Photo

Looking back now, it almost seems as though everything happened at once. In a decade dominated by youth, London had burst into bloom. It was swinging, and it was the scene. The Union Jack suddenly became as ubiquitous as the black cab or the red Routemaster bus, and all became icons of the city...Quite simply, London was where it was at. Fuelled by growing prosperity, social mobility, post-war optimism and wave after wave of youthful enterprise, the city captured the imagination of the world’s media. Here was the centre of the sexual revolution – the pill had been introduced in 1961 – the musical revolution, the sartorial revolution. London was a veritable cauldron of benign revolt.

- Dylan Jones

Photo: Faye Dunaway photographed by Jean-Pierre Biot in London, 1967.

#jones #dylan jones #quote #london #swinging london #1960s #swinging sixties #society #culture #youth culture #london bus #faye dunaway #city

77 notes · View notes

driftwork · 1 year

Text

names, mostly surnames (1)

let me apologise for this partial list of names in the library, titles available on request...

, Adorno, horkheimer, anderson, aristotle, greta adorno, marcuse, agamben, acampora and acampora, althussar, lajac kovacic, eric alliez, marc auge, attali, francis bacon (16th c), aries, aries and bejin, alain badiou, beckett, hallward, barnes, bachelard, bahktin, volshinov, baudrillard, barthes, john beattie, medvedev, henri bergson, Jacques Bidet, berkman, zybmunt bauman, burgin, baugh, sam butler, ulrich beck, andrew benjamin and peter osbourne, walter benjamin, ernest bloch, blanchot, bruzins, bonnet, karin bojs, bourdieu, j.d. bernal, goldsmith, benveniste, braidotti, brecht, burch, victor serge, andre breton, judith butler, malcolm bull, stanley cohen, john berger, etienne balibar, david bohm, gans blumenberg, martin buber, christopher caudwell, micel callon, albert camus, agnes callard, castoridis, claudio celis bueno, carchedi and roberts, Marisol de la cadena, mario blaser, nancy cartwright, manual castells, mark currie, collingwood, canguilhem, mario corti, stuart hall, andrew lowe, paul willis, coyne, stefan collini, varbara cassin, helene cixous, coward and ellis, clastres, carr, cioren, irving copi, cassirer, carter and willians, margeret cohen, Francoise dastur, guy debord, agnes martin, michele bernstein, alice, lorraine dastun, debaise, Gilles Deleuze, deleuze and gattari, guattari, parnet, iain mackenzie, bignall, stivale, holland, smith, james williams, zourabichvili, paul patton, kerslake, schuster, bogue, bryant, anne sauvagnargues, hanjo berresen, frida beckman, johnson, gulliarme and hughes, valentine moulard-leonard, desai, dosse, duttman, d’amico, benoit peters, derrida, hinca zarifopol-johnston, sean gaston, discourse, mark poster, foucault, steve fuller, markus gabrial, rosenbergm milchamn, colin jones, van fraasen, fekete, vilem flusser, flahault, heri focillon, rudi visker, ernst fischer, fink, faye, fuller, fiho, marco bollo, hans magnus enxensberger, leen de bolle, canetti, ilya enrenberg, thuan, sebastion peake, mervyn peake, robert henderson, reimann, roth, bae suah, yabouza, marco bellatin, cartarescu, nick harkaway, chris norris, deLanda, regis debray, pattern and doniger, soame jynens, bernard williams, descartes, anne dufourmanteille, michelle le doeuff, de certaeu , deligny, Georges Dumezil, dumenil and levy, bernard edelman, victorverlich, berio, arendt, amy allen, de beauvior,hiroka azumi, bedau and humphreys, beuad, georges bataille, caspar henderson, chris innes, yevgeny zamyatin, louis aragon, italo calvino, pierre guirard, trustan garcia, rene girard, paul gilroy, michal gardner, andre gorz, jurgan gabermas, martin gagglund, beatrice hannssen, jean hyppolyte, axel honneth, zizek and crickett, stephen heath, calentin groebner, j.b.s. haldane, ian hacking, david hakken, hallward and oekken, haug, harman, latour, arnold hauser, hegel, pippin, pinksrd, michel henry, louis hjelmslev, gilbert hardin, alice jardine, karl jaspers, suzzane kirkbright, david hume, thomas hobbes, barry hindus, paul hirst, hindess and hirst, wrrner hamacher, bertrand gille, julien huxley, halavais, irigaray, ted honderich, julia kristeva, leibnitz, d lecourt, lazzaroto, kluge and negt, alexander kluge, sarah kofman, alexandre kojeve, kolozoya, keynes, richard kangston, ben lehman, kant, francous jullien, fred hameson, sntonio rabucchi, jaeggi, steve lanierjones, tim jackson, jakobson, joeseph needham, arne de boever, marx and engels, karl marx, frederick engels, heinrich, McLellen , maturana and varuna, lem, lordon, jean jacques-lecercle, malabou, marazzi, heiner muller, mary midgley, armand matterlart, ariel dorfman, matakovsky, nacneice, lucid, victor margolis, narco lippi, glen mazis, nair, william morris, nabis, jean luc nancy, geoffrey nash, antonio negri, negri and hardt, hardt, keith ansell pearson, pettman, william ruddiman, rheinberger, andre orlean, v.i. vernadsky, rodchenko, john willet, tarkovsky, william empson, michel serres, virillio, semiotexte, helmut heiseenbuttel, plessner, pechaux, raunig, retort, saito, serres, dolphin, maria assad, spinoza, bernard sharratt, isabelle stengers, viktor shklovsky, t. todorov, enzo traverso, mario tronti, todes, ivan pavlov, whitehead, frank trentmann, trubetzkoy, rodowink, widderman, karl wittfogel, peter handke, olivier rolin, pavese, robert walser, petr kral, von arnim, sir john mennis, ladies cabinet, samuel johnson, edmund spenser, efy poppy, yoko ogawa, machado, kaurence durrell, brigid brophy, a. betram chandler, maria gabriella llansol, fowler, ransmayr, novick, llewellyn, brennan, sean carroll, julien rios, pintor, wraxall, jaccottet, tabucchi, iain banks, glasstone, clarice lispector, murakami, ludmilla petrushevskaya, motoya, bachmann, lindqvist, uwe johnson, einear macbride, szentkuthy, vladislavic, nanguel, mathias enard, chris tomas, jonathan meades, armo schmidt, charles yu, micheal sorkin, vilas- matas, varesi, peter weiss, stephenson, paul legrande, virginie despentes, pessoa, brin, furst, gunter trass, umberto eco, reid, paul,klee, mario levero, hearn, judith schalansky, moorhead, margert walters, rodchenko and popova, david king, alisdair gray, burroughs, ben fine, paul hirst, hindess, kapuscinski, tchaikovsky, brooke-rose, david hoon kim, helms, mahfouz, ardret, felipe fernandez-armesto, young and tagomon, aronson, bonneuil and fressoz, h.s. bennett, amy allen, bruckner brown, honegger, bernhard, warren miller, albert thelen, margoy bennett, rose macauley, nenjamin peret, sax rohmer, angeliki, bostrom, phillip ball, the invisible commitee, bataille and leiris, gregory bateson, michelle barrett and mary mcintosh, bardini, bugin, mcdonald, kaplan, buck-moores, chesterman and lipman, berman, cicero, chanan, chatelet, helene cixous, iain cha,bers, smirgel, norman clark, caird, camus, clayre, chomsky, critchley, curry, swingewood, luigi luca cavelli-sforza, clark, esposito, doerner, de duve, alexander dovzhenko, donzelot, dennet, doyle, burkheim, de camp, darwin, dawkins, didi-huberman, dundar, george dyson, berard deleuze, evo, barbara ehrenrich, edwards, e isenstein, ebeking, economy and society, esposito, frederick gross, david edgeerton, douglas, paul,feyerband, jerry fodor, gorrdiener, tom forester, korsgaard, fink, floridi, elizabeth groscz, pierre francastel, jane jacobs, francois laplantinee, gould, galloway, goux, godel, grouys, genette, gil, kahloo, giddens, martin gardner, gilbert and dubar, hobbes, herve, golinski, grotowski, glieck, hayles, heidegger, huxley, eric hobsbawn, jean-louis hippolyte, phillip hoare, tim jordan, david harvey, hawking, hoggart, rosemary jackson, myerson, mary jacobus, fox keller, illich, sarah fofman, sylvia harvey, john holloway, han, jaspers, yuk hui, pierre hadot, carl gardner, william james, bell hooks, edmond jabes, kierkegaard, alexander keen, kropotkin, tracy kidder, mithen, kothari and mehta, lind, c. joad, bart kosko, kathy myers, kaplan, luce irigaraay, patrick ke iller, kittler, catherine belsey, kmar, klossowski, holmes, kant, stanton, ernesto laclau, jenkins, la mouffe, walter john williams, adam greenfield, susan greenfield, paul auster, viet nguyen, jeremy nicholson, andy weir, fred jameson, lacoue-labarthe, bede, jane gallop, lacan, wilden, willy ley, henri lefebvre, rob sheilds, sandra laugier, micheal lowy, barry levinson, sylvain lazurus, lousardo, leopardo, jean-francois lyotard, jones, lewontin, steve levy, alice in genderland, laing, lanier, lakatos, laurelle, luxemburg, lukacs, jarsh, james lovelock, ideologu and consciousness, economy and society, screen, deleuze studies, deleuze and guattari studies, bruno latour, david lapoujade, stephen law, primo levi, levi-strauss, emmanuel levinas, viktor schonberger, pierre levy, gustav landaur, robin le poidevin, les levidow, lautman, david cooper, serge leclaire, catherine malabou, karl kautsky, alice meynall, j.s. mill, montainge, elaine miller, rosa levine-meyer, jean luc marion, henri lefebrve, lipovetsky, terry lovell, niklas luhmann, richard may, machiavelli, richard mabey, john mullzrkey, meyerhold, edward braun, magri, murray, nathanial lichfield, noelle mcafee, hans meyer, ouspensky, lucretius, asa briggs, william morris, christian metz, laura mulvey, len masterman, karl mannheim, louis marin, alaister reynolds, antonio munoz molina, FRAZER, arno schmidt, dinae waldman, mark rothko, cornwall, micheal snow, sophie henaff, scarlett thomas, matuszewski, lillya brik, rosamond lehman , morris and o’conner, nina bawden, cora sandel, delafield, storm jameson, lovi , rachel ferguson, stevie smith, pat barker, miles franklin, fay weldon, crista wolff, grace paley, v. woolf, naomi mitchinson, sheila rowbotham, e, somerville and v ross, sander marai, jose saramago, strugatsky, jean echenoz, mark robso, vladimir Vernadsky, chris marker, Kim Stanley Robinson, mario leverdo, r.a. lafferty, martin bax, mcaulay, tatyana tolstaya, colinn kapp, jonathan meades, franco fortini, sam delany, philip e high, h.g. adler, feng menglong, adam thorpe, peeter nadas, sam butler, narnold silver, deren, joanna moorhead, leonara carrington, de waal, hartt, botticelli, charbonneau, casco pratolini, murakami, aldiss, guidomorselli, ludmilla petrushevskaya, ,schulz, de andrade, yasushi. inoue, renoir, amelie nothomb, ken liu, prynne, ANTIONE VOLODINE, luc brasso, angela greene, dorothea tanning, eric chevillard, margot bennett w.e. johns, conan doyle, samuel johnson, herge, coutine-denamy, sterling, roubaud, sloan, meiville, delarivier manley, andre norton, perec, edward upward, tom mcCarthy, magrinya, stross, eco, godden, malcolm lowry, derekmiller, ismail kadare, scott lynch, chris fowler, perter newman, suzzana clarke, paretky, juliscz balicki, stanislaw maykowski, rajaniemi, william morris, c.k. crow, ueys, oldenburg, mssrc chwmot, will pryce, munroe, brnabas and kindersley, tromans, lem, zelazny, mitchinson, harry Harrison, konstantin tsiolkovsky, flammerion, harrison, arthur c clarke, carpenter, john brunner, anhony powell, ted white, sheckley, kristof, kempowski, shingo, angelica groodischer, rolin, galeanom dobin, richard holloway, pohl and kornbulth, e.r. eddison, ken macleodm aldiss, dave hutchinson, alfred bester, budrys, pynchon, kurkov, wisniewski_snerg, , kenji miyazawa, dante, laidlaw, paek nam_nyong, maspero, colohouquon, hernandez, christina hesselholdt, claude simon, bulgaakov, simak, verissimo, sorokin, sarraute, prevert, celan, bachmann, mervin peake, olaf stapledon, sa rohmer, robert musil, le clezio, jeremy cooper, zambra, giorgio de chirico, mjax frisch, gawron, daumal, tomzza, canetti, framcois maspero, de quincy, defoe, green,, greene, marani, bellatin, khury, tapinar,, richmal crompton, durrenmat, fritz, quintane, volponi, nanni balestrini, herrera, robert walser, duras, peter stamm, m foster, lan wright, their theotokism agustn de rojas, paul eluard, sturgeon, hiromi kawakomi, sayaka murata, wolfgang hilbig, hmilton, z zivkovic, gersson, mallo, bird, chaudrey, Toussaint, Can Xue, Lewis Mumford, neitzsche, popper, zizek, scott westerfield, rousseau, lewis munford, tod may, penelope maddy, elaine marks, isabelle courtivron, leroi, massumi, david sterritt, godard, millican and clark, macabe, negri, mauss, maiimon, patrica maccormack, moretti, courtney humphries, monad, moyn, malina, picasso, goldman, dambisa moyo, merleau-ponty, Nicholson, knobe and nichols, poinciore, morris, ovid, ming, nail, thomas more, richard mabey, macfarlane, piscator, louis-stempal, negrastini, moore, jacquline rose, rose and rose, ryle, roszick, rosenburg, ravisson, paul ricoer, rossler, chantl mouffe, david reiff, plato, slater, rowlands, rosa, john roberts, rhan, dubios and rousseau, ronell, jacques ranciere, mallarme, quinodoz, peterpelbert, mary poovey, mackenzie, andrew price, opopper, roger penrose, lu cino parisi, gavin rae, parker and pollack, mirowoski, perniola, postman, panofsky, propp, paschke and rodel, andre pickering, massabuau, lars svenddsen, rosenberg and whyte, t.l.s. sprigger, nancy armstrong, sallis, dale spender, stanislavski, vanessa schwartz, shapin and shaeffer, sally sedgewick, signs, gabriel tarde, charles singer, adam smith, simondon, pascal chablt, combes, jon roffee, edward said, sen, nik farrell fox, sartre, fred emery, scholes, herbert spencer, ruth saw, spinoza, raphael sassower, henry sidgewick, peter singer, katarznya de lazari-radek, piaget, podach, van der post, on fire, one press, melossi and pavarini, pearl and mackenzie, theirry paquot, tanizaki, RHS, stone, richard sennett, graham priest, osborn and pagnell, substance, pedrag cicovacki, schilthuizen, susan sontag, gillian rose, nikolas rose, g rattery taylor, rose, rajan, stuart sim, max raphael, media culture and society, heller- roazen, rid, root, rossi, gramsci, showstack sasson, david roden, adrew ross, rosenvallion, pauliina remes, pkato, peter sloterdijk, tamsin shaw, george simmel, bullock and trombley, mark francis, alain supiot, suvin, mullen and suvin, stroma, maimonides, van vogt, the clouds on unknowing, enclotic, thesis 11, spivack, kate raworth, h.w. richardson, hillial schwartz, stern, rebecca solnit, rowland parker, pickering, lukacs, epicriud, epicetus, lucrtious, aurelies, w.j.oates, thor Hanson, thompson, mabey, sheldrake, eatherley, plato, jeffries, dorothy richardson, arno schmidt, earl derr biggersm mary borden, birrel, arno schmidt, o.a. henty, berhard steigler, victor serge, smith, joyce salisbury, pauer-studer, timpanaro, s helling, schlor, norman and welchman, searle, emanuele severarimo, tomasello, sklar, judith singer, walmisley, thomas malthus, quentin meilassoux, alberto meelucchi, mingione, rurnbull, said, spufford and uglow, zone, j.j.c. smartt, sandel, skater, songe-moller, strawson, strawson, strawson, raymond tallis, toscano, turkle, tiqquin, diggins, j.s. ogilivy, w.w. hutchings, rackgam, deiter roth, dowell, red notes, campbell and pryce,osip brik, lilya brik, mayakovsky, zone, alvin toffker, st exupery, freya stark, warson, walsh, wooley, tiles and oberdick, timofeeva, richardson, marcuse, marder, wright, ushenko, tolson, albebers and moholy- nagy, alyce mahon, gablik, burnett, barry, hill, fontaine, sanuel johnson,justin, block, taylor, peter handke, jacques rivette, william sansom, bunuel and dali, tom bullough, aldius huxley, philip robinson, spendor, tzara, wajcman, peter wohlleben, prigogini, paolo virno, jeremy tunstall, theweliet, taussig, tricker, vince, thomss, williams, vogl, new german critique, e.p. thompson, jean wahl, paul virilio, lotringer, christy wampole, verhaeghe, janet wolff, anna kavan, vergara, uexkull, couze venn, barry smart, vico, vatimo, vernant, raoul vaneigem, ibn warraq, vertov, williams, meiksins wood, norbert weiner, peter wollen, h.g. wells, michelle walker, , jeanne waelit walters, shaw and darlen, whorf, ward and dubois, john wright, weinart, wolff, willis, wark, cosima wagner, j. weeks, judith williamson, welzbacher, erik olin wright, wittgenstein, kenny, zeldin, wenders, henry miller, wenkler, arrighi, banks, innes, ushereood, kristeva, john cage, quignard, t.f. powys, siri hustveldt, lem, zelazny, mitchonson, tsilolkovsky, toussaint, heppenstall, garrigasait, de kerangal, haine fenn, jean bloch, geoff ryman, reve, corey, asemkulov, ernaux, gareth powell, cory, deleuze and guattari studies, cse, allain and souvestre, apolinaire, jane austen, john arden, aitmatov, elizabth von arnim, paul auster, abish, ackroyd, tom gunn, lorca, akhmatov, artuad, simon armatige, albahari, felipe alfau, audem auden and soendor, varicco, barrico, bainbridge, asturias, ronan bennett, beckett, paul bowles, jane bowles, celine, bukowski, wu ming, blissert, kay boyle, andrei bely, hugo barnacle, BOLL, isak dineson, karen blikson, brodsky, richmel crompton, berry, barthleme, mary butts, leonora carrington, cage, chevhillard, canetti, cendres, butor, cortazar, danielewski, bertha damon, dyer, havier cercas, micheal dibden, marguerite duras, john donne, duras, durrell, dorrie, Fredric durrenmatt, heppenstahl, eco, enzensberger, evanovich, fruentes, farrell, alison fell, alisdair gray, hollinhurst, andre gide, jean giono, gadda, henry green, grass, andre gorz, william gibson, joyce, gombrowitz, alex laishley, murakami, herve guibert, franz kafka, juenger, junker, kapuscinski, laurie king, kundera, mcewan, ken macleod, ian macdonald, moers, meades, vonda macintyre, nalmstom, maillert, havier marias, jeff noon, anaus nin, david nobbs, peter nadas, nabokov, iakley, oates, raymond queneau, cesare pavese, paterson, ponge, perte, perec, chinery, ovid, genette, kandinsky, robert pinget, richard piwers, rouvaud, sloan, surrralist poetry, ilya troyanov, paul,raabe, julien rios, arne dahl, pierre sollers, rodrigruez, chris ross, renate rasp, ruiz, rulfo, tove jannsson, cabre, vladislavic, tokarczuk, pessoa, jane bowles, calvino, lispector, lydia davis, can xue, sebald, peter tripp, hertzberg, virginia woolf, zozola, sorrentino, higgins, v.w. straka, cogman, freud, jung, klein, winnecot, lacan, fordham, samuels, jung, freud, appignesai, bjp, pullman, magnam, sybil marshall, mccarten, galbraith, jewell, lehmann, levy, levin, jung, spinoza, fairburn, jung, sandler, lacan, laplanche, pontalis, can, xue, klein, cavelli, hawkins, stevens, hanna segal, bollas, welldon, williams, sutherland, buon, symington, morrison, brittain, sidoli, sidoli, holmes, bowlby, winnecott, bollas, kalschiid, malan, patrick casement, anna frued, wittenburg, liz wright, fordham, fairburn, symington, sandler, jung, balint, coltart, west, steiner, van der post, stern, green, roustang, adrew samuels, d.l. sayers, salom, krassner, swain, rame and fo, storr, cogman, hessen, penelope fitzgerald, cummings, richard holloway, juhea kim, glenville, heyer, cartland, kim, cho, atkinson, james, king, audten, hartley, du maurier, bronte, thomas, plath, leon, camillairi, kaussar, fred fargas, boyd, sjowall and wahloo, pheby, morenno-garcia, perrsson, herron, nicola barker, arronovitch, karen lord, stephen frosh, ernest jones, flamm o’brien, shin, mishra, chin jin-young and so on to the warm horizon

#names #ideology and discourse #everyday practices

5 notes · View notes

crescentcream · 6 months

Text

𝙢𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩 𝙜𝙖𝙡𝙤𝙧𝙚

[total works]: 0 (but dw yall im cooking smth up)

my own works here (interracial):

𝒄𝒐𝒘𝒃𝒐𝒚 𝒃𝒆𝒃𝒐𝒑

spike spiegel;

faye valentine;

jet black;

𝙏𝙑𝘿𝙐

damon salvatore;

stefan salvatore;

klaus mikaelson;

elijah mikaelson;

rebekah mikaelson;

kol mikaelson;

freya mikaelson;

𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞

pearl;

lapis lazuli;

𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗹

wanda maximoff;

steve rogers;

nastasha romanoff;

loki;

bucky barnes;

marc spector;

matt murdock;

𝙡𝙪𝙘𝙞𝙛𝙚𝙧

lucifer morningstar;

mazikeen;

𝐣𝐮𝐣𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐮 𝐤𝐚𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐧

gojo satoru;

geto suguru;

megumi fushiguro;

nobara kugisaki;

kento nanami;

𝐚𝐭𝐥𝐚/𝐋𝐨𝐊

zuko;

korra;

mako;

bolin;

𝙟𝙟𝙗𝙖

jonathan joestar;

joesph jostar;

jotaro kujo;

josuke higashikata;

giorno giovanna;

jolyne cujoh;

caesar zeppli;

lisa lisa;

dio brando;

kakyoin noriaki;

mohammed avdol;

jean pierre polnareff;

rohan kishibe;

koichi hirose;

okuysau nijimura;

kira yoshikage;

𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐧

levi ackerman;

mikasa ackerman;

eren jaeger;

jean kirstein;

reiner braun;

armin arlert;

erwin smith;

hange zoe;

annie leonhart;

historia reiss;

(more characters to be added in all these)

(bare with me with this masterlist yall LMAOAOAOA)

#multifandom #marvel #lucifer #steven universe #jjk #jjba #tvdu #cowboy bebop #atla #LoK #romance #writing #stories #masterlist #x reader #x black reader

1 note · View note

richaldis · 1 year

Text

@msclaritea Jean-Pierre Faye's horseshoe theory has been derided as a tool of the moderate right used to divert attention away from the shift to more extreme right wing views in the US. It is no longer a theory which holds water in Western politics.

And even if it were a useful analysis (which it's not) it would not apply to moderate left leaning views such as those held by the Guardian editorial board and its readership. In fact horseshoe theory would put those moderate views further from the right, not nearer.

Things the Guardian does:

Reports news

Campaigns and supports moderate left and centerist causes and viewpoints

Supports the arts, science and culture

Things the Guardian doesn't do:

Spam the comments of twitter users talking about actors with mildly positive comments, which you think are negative for some obscure reason.

A single comment by a single person, Guardian journalist or not, isn't spamming.

You really are a poor advert for education in your country.

3 notes · View notes

xtruss · 2 years

Text

Analysis: Why America’s Far Right and Far Left Have Aligned Against Helping Ukraine

The discourse surrounding Russia’s war on Ukraine has created strange bedfellows.

— By Jan Dutkiewicz, a policy fellow at the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law and Policy Program at Harvard Law School, and Dominik Stecuła, an assistant professor of political science at Colorado State University | July 04, 2022 | Foreign Policy

Anti-war protesters led by Code Pink demonstrate outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington on March 16. Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Since Russia attacked Ukraine, unprovoked, on Feb. 24, the discourse surrounding the war that has emerged in the United States has created strange bedfellows. Although the majority of the American public, led by U.S. President Joe Biden, have thrown their support behind Ukraine, many on the left and right alike have rushed to defend Russian President Vladimir Putin’s regime or, at the very least, have urged the United States not to intervene in Ukraine’s defense.

Tucker Carlson, the face of Fox News and host of the most popular show on cable news in the United States, has been spouting pro-Kremlin talking points for months (and is frequently rebroadcasted on Russian state television). Other right-wing figures regularly spew out anti-Ukrainian disinformation and rail against sending heavy weapons to the country.

Meanwhile, the luminary of the American intellectual left, Noam Chomsky, has invoked former U.S. President Donald Trump as a model of level-headed geopolitical statesmanship for his opposition to arming Ukraine. Left-wing sources—such as Jacobin, New Left Review, and Democracy Now!—have hewed to a party line that blames NATO expansion for Russia’s invasion and opposes military aid to Ukraine.

Online, armies of left- and right-wing accounts find fault with Ukraine’s politics, policies, and president. In Congress, seven of the most fervent conservative Trump supporters voted alongside progressive champions Reps. Ilhan Omar and Cori Bush against banning Russian fossil fuels; even more surprisingly, Omar and Bush are joined by so-called squad members Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib as well as the far-right fringe of the Republican Party in opposing the U.S. government seizing Russian oligarchs’ assets.

What we seem to be seeing is a modern-day version of the horseshoe theory of politics, where the far left and far right find themselves in uncanny alignment. Although historically maligned, the theory seems to hold remarkably well when it comes to U.S. opinion on the Russia-Ukraine war. This doesn’t have much to do with ideological symmetry, however, or even Russia or Ukraine, for that matter. Rather, it has everything to do with the fraught state of U.S. politics, where relying on simple notions of “left” and “right” or “conservative” and “progressive” no longer serves a useful heuristic for understanding political developments.

The horseshoe theory of politics was introduced by French philosopher Jean-Pierre Faye, who believed that the political ideological spectrum—traditionally construed as a linear progression from some form of socialism or democratic collectivism through a bourgeois-liberal center and on to some form of totalitarianism or fascism—was not a straight line between ever-more-distant political positions but rather something like a horseshoe, with the extremes bending almost magnetically into conjunction with each other.

Based on his observation of the alignment of fascist and communist parties in early 1930s German domestic politics and then on the Nazi-Soviet alignment in the international sphere, perhaps best embodied by the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, he believed that the political extremes have much more in common than a traditional interpretation of the political spectrum might suggest.

The idea of the political horseshoe has long been criticized both for its lack of intellectual rigor and for its weaponization by centrists to discredit their opponents, mostly by those on the left who could be compared to the conservatives they ostensibly oppose. Critics of the theory tend to point out that any seeming convergence on political positions between the far left and far right—such as critiques of liberal democracy, globalization, and market-based solutions to social problems—is superficial, masking far deeper and divergent ideological and policy preferences. If anything, what unites the far left and far right, critics assert, is opposition to the liberal center, which is why the liberal center so often uses the horseshoe as a cudgel.

One reason for this is that the traditional, one-dimensional left-right spectrum does not account for other axes of political division in U.S. politics, such as those dominated not by any traditionally intellectual notions of progressivism or conservatism but instead by negative attitudes toward “the establishment” and broader forms of populism. As one of us has previously noted, populism in the United States is not constrained to the “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) Trump supporters on the right. Instead, it is distributed across the political spectrum, with populists both on the political left (among Sen. Bernie Sanders supporters, for example) and right (among Trump supporters).

What seem to unite the ends of the horseshoe, if we run with Faye’s metaphor, are not high-brow notions of conservatism or progressivism but instead, opposition to elites, party “establishments,” and traditional gatekeepers in the mainstream press. When it comes to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, not only do we see considerable support for the horseshoe theory but also for something that goes beyond it: the idea that the simple left-right paradigm does not get us particularly far in understanding U.S. politics.

Since Russia invaded Ukraine this year, the vast majority of Americans from both parties have supported the U.S. government’s position: They support providing military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine, and surprisingly, there is even considerable bipartisan support for welcoming Ukrainian refugees to the United States. But Russia has found vocal allies too.

The close ideological and financial relationship between many far-right European parties and the Kremlin is hardly a secret, making their support for Putin’s genocidal campaign par for the course. But considerable elements of the American right, including members of the Republican Party, have openly sided with Russia since the invasion.

The GOP has historically wielded its anti-Soviet (pre-1989) and anti-Russian (post-1989) position to great political effect. This is, after all, the party of “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” In 2012, then-GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney called Russia the United States’ primary geopolitical foe and a country that “always stands up for the world’s worst actors.” Fast forward to 2022, and Republicans—including Trump; his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr.; (soon to be former) Rep. Madison Cawthorn; Ohio Senate candidate J.D. Vance; Fox News personalities, such as Laura Ingraham; and conservative influencers, such as Candace Owens—have all broken from the party line to heap scorn on Ukraine and U.S. efforts to assist it.

A number of tropes that recur in this right-wing critique is the claim that NATO expansion forced Putin’s hand and led to the invasion as well as that money spent on military aid to Ukraine would be better spent on domestic issues, even if those issues include the continued militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border, as suggested by Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley.

Meanwhile, many on the progressive left—including members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and the politicians they support, left-wing academics and essayists, and swaths of self-proclaimed online “anti-imperialists”—have tended to side with the aggressor, Russia (or at least not side with the victim, Ukraine) in one of the clearest examples of colonial aggression in recent memory. Their primary arguments mirror those of the right—NATO expansion and Russia’s legitimate security concerns as a trigger for the war as well as the misuse of funds that could be used to solve domestic problems—but they also express opposition to war full stop and, sometimes, espouse outright support for Russia, all wrapped in language of opposition to U.S. intervention abroad, often construed as “U.S. imperialism.”

There has always been a fringe minority of voices on the far left that have been pejoratively labeled “tankies.” Often self-identified as Marxist-Leninists, they have been apologists for the repressive actions of authoritarian communist governments, such as those of the Soviet Union or China. The insult was originally hurled by fellow leftists at the Western communists who cheered as the Soviet Union rolled tanks into Budapest to repress a popular anti-Soviet uprising in Hungary in 1956. Today, the term is mostly tossed around in online circles, referring to supporters of repressive regimes and applying primarily to the opinions held by fringe journalists working for opaquely funded alternative news sources who praise dictators, such as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

When it comes to Ukraine, many tankies have embraced a pro-Moscow position and parroted Kremlin talking points, perhaps failing to disambiguate between Russia, an authoritarian capitalist-oligarchic state, and its predecessor, the Soviet Union, an authoritarian communist state. These positions include the false claim that Ukraine’s 2014 Euromaidan protest movement was a U.S.-backed coup, which has been shared directly by elected officials like DSA-backed New York City council member Kristin Richardson Jordan in the form of links to online tankie disinformation. But similar claims have also been made by QAnon-boosting GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and seemingly serious leading scholars, including Chomsky and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer.

Indeed, what has pulled the ends of the horseshoe together when it comes to Ukraine is not simply opposition to the conflict or cheerleading for Russia but a ready embrace of ideas from across the political spectrum that suits these positions. In other words, contrary to what critics of horseshoe theory claim, we see not only superficial political similarities on Ukraine but a far deeper, if opportunistic, ideological alignment.

Mearsheimer’s work is instructive here. A highly influential scholar of international relations, Mearsheimer is known as one of the leading proponents of the “offensive realism” school of analysis of world affairs. This school argues that states, especially great powers, will act rationally to maximize their military power in an anarchic world system, meaning that they are likely to react violently to perceived threats to their security.

Mearsheimer’s most influential contribution to the debate about Ukraine—other than his musings that U.S. support for the 2014 Euromaidan protests constituted a coup—is that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was directly caused by NATO’s expansion into Russia’s sphere of influence in Eastern Europe and the Baltics, including its overtures to Ukraine. According to offensive realist analysis, Russia’s attack heads off this U.S.-led expansion. Despite the fact that this theory has been widely challenged since the conflict’s first day, Mearsheimer’s explanation has traveled widely.

He has aired his ideas in a guest column for the Economist and in an interview with the New Yorker, and his work has been mentioned by critics of U.S. policy in Ukraine from think tanks such as the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, whose funding sources include both billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations and the Koch Foundation, and the Koch-funded and Sen. Rand Paul-backed Defense Priorities as well as leftist publications, such as the openly socialist Monthly Review, the tweedy Current Affairs, and the trusty social democratic standby the Nation. Mearsheimer has also been retweeted by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Usually, Mearsheimer’s ideas about Ukraine have been discussed separately from his broader theories about offensive realism because these might prove unappetizing to the very people championing Mearsheimer as the éminence grise on Russian strategic logic. To take a historical example, it’s hard to imagine the United States’ progressive elite championing its attempted invasion of Cuba in 1961 because the country was a Soviet staging ground within the U.S. sphere of influence. But this “red in tooth and claw” realism is exactly what offensive realism implies.

A similar citational fate has befallen both Chomsky, a fierce critic of U.S. foreign policy and brutal international interventionism, and former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the architect of much of that foreign policy and brutal international interventionism. The ends of the horseshoe virtually kiss when these two men’s theories about the end of the conflict in Ukraine overlap. Recently, both men called for the West and Ukraine not to escalate the conflict with Russia and to instead seek “peace.”

And they have both, often in tandem, been used by both the left- and right-wing commentariat to support their claims about Ukraine, including in a recent piece in New York magazine that managed to both claim that the United States does not have the right to intervene in the conflict and has both the power and right to bring Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the bargaining table.

Of course, there is no reason why people from diverse political leanings shouldn’t draw on the same experts’ political analysis, but the willy-nilly embrace of scholars and statesmen simply because they share one’s predisposition shows a paucity of real political analysis on the far left and far right alike. Both agree on Ukraine, so both draw on the experts (mostly big-name Anglo-Saxon ones and few, if any, Ukrainian ones) that confirm their position.

To see leftists conceding that Kissinger has a point and Republicans handing it to Chomsky has been quite something. But, the argument goes, if Chomsky and Kissinger (and Mearsheimer) agree, then they must be right. But they’re not. Putin said so himself when he recently compared himself to Peter the Great, claiming Russia’s right to expand into its previous colonies and dropping the pretense that Western provocations had much to do with his decision to invade Ukraine. And there went the strongest argument of both ends of the horseshoe: that this was the West’s fault, driven by the United States. In fact, maybe what explains the horseshoe regarding Ukraine is that it has little to do with Ukraine after all.

For all their disparate political goals and motivations, what unites the far left and far right is their relationship to U.S. politics. What unites them is an opposition to what they perceive as the faults of the status quo, a distrust of the establishment, and crude anti-Americanism.

On the political right, the actions of legislators like Greene, Cawthorn, Rep. Paul Gosar, or Rep. Matt Gaetz—all of whom oppose U.S. support for Ukraine against Russia—seem to be driven by a profound dislike of the United States as an ethnically and racially diverse democracy, a country where Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage, is the law of the land (at least, for now).

Many on the far right despise that reality and recognize the ideological proximity of their political goals to what they see as Putin’s accomplishments, including making life extremely difficult for Russia’s LGBTQ community. His general anti-wokeness has been lauded by former Trump advisor and current MAGA influencer Steve Bannon. The Russian propaganda machine has been remarkably well versed in the language of U.S. culture wars, and there is a widespread perception that Putin and Russia are allies to the MAGA wing of the GOP on that culture war front.

The other aspect is the simple fact that in the polarized landscape of U.S. politics, partisanship trumps national interest and lending any support to Biden is simply unacceptable. If Biden and the Democrats take a position (any position), it must simply be wrong and be viciously opposed. That dynamic has been captured by a viral photo from a Trump rally in 2018 that shows two men proudly wearing “I’d rather be a Russian than a Democrat” T-shirts. Unfortunately, as we have highlighted, many MAGA politicians are not just talking the talk; they’re walking the walk on that front.

On the progressive left, the motivation is less any perceived alignment with Putin’s policies and more just plain distrust of U.S. foreign policy. Many Americans in these political circles are very invested in the narrative that the United States is a bad international actor that has caused a lot of pain abroad through various wars (most notably, but not exclusively: Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam). As a result, they reflexively default to the viewpoint that whatever the U.S. policy is toward a foreign conflict, it must be self-interested or even imperialist. This is why many leftists end up repeating the pro-Kremlin framing of NATO expansion as unilateral American imperialism and, even more bizarrely, citing figures like Mearsheimer—and even Kissinger, a traditional enemy of the American left—to support their point.

This framing, of course, misses years of lobbying that countries such as Poland have engaged in to join NATO or the reasons these countries had for pursuing this political course and implicitly deprives these states of any agency in charting their own futures. This is not just cultural chauvinism aimed at the post-Soviet Slavic states that might be explained by a Cold War analytical hangover or plain racism—given that a similar set of arguments is being deployed against Sweden and Finland, which are both on track to join NATO.

If anything, this approach leads (or, one might say, reveals) progressives to be exactly what they profess not to be: U.S.-centered. By treating the United States as the de facto global power, even though it is a great power they oppose, they inadvertently repeat great-power tropes, such as that the United States should (and can) achieve a cease-fire in Ukraine and dictate the terms of that cease-fire to both Russia and Ukraine. This includes the idea that the United States should convince Ukraine to cede territory and the people who live there to Russia.

Reviving a Yalta Conference mindset, but from the left, these ostensible progressives refuse Ukrainians agency, oppose U.S. armed involvement, and yet believe that the United States has the power and right to parcel out Ukrainian land in exchange for peace in Ukraine. In the heart of this perverse leftist anti-imperialism lies the un-imperial impulse to wield imperial power but only, ostensibly, in the name of peace—no matter the will of the locals.

It is not that the U.S. far right and far left share a unified foreign-policy vision, but they do share a vision for Ukraine: naive anti-interventionism. But perhaps rather than simply confirming horseshoe theory, the existence of these strange bedfellows should make us question a simplistic vision of the political spectrum as a unidimensional left-right political space.

After all, there are many on the left—understood as those supporting internationalism, social justice, and redistributive policies—including Sanders, who have thrown their support behind Ukraine for reasons consistent with their broader politics, including opposition to previous U.S. military involvement abroad. So too have many on the right—understood as those who believe in free markets or hold generally conservative sociopolitical positions—supported arming Ukraine, also for reasons consistent with their politics, including a vision of a strong role for the United States in world politics. The center (broadly construed) is also on board—hence the relative consensus on actual policy.

So what accounts for why the ends of the horseshoe are magnetically attracted to each other, pulled away from the rest of the spectrum?

That magnetic force does not come from the political content of the sides of the spectrum. As political scientist Philip Converse demonstrated back in 1964, and as other scholars have subsequently shown, an overwhelming majority of Americans do not hold coherent ideological views. People who do are, in many ways, outliers. The force behind the horseshoe, then, is another dimension of politics without which it is impossible to understand, among other things, why on earth Chomsky and Kissinger would be embraced by people who would never otherwise agree with them both on much of anything. This is the populist, anti-establishment dimension of U.S. politics.

Populism as a term has become something of an empty signifier and, for many, a pejorative. It has been associated with nativist right-wing leaders—such as Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Polish politician Jaroslaw Kaczynski, and Trump—but also with Sanders’s presidential campaign. If anything, in the United States, populism was historically associated with the egalitarian politics of the Populist Party and the subsequent left-wing progressive movement.

But here, what we mean by populism is simply a worldview that pits average citizens, “the people,” against “the elites,” whom populists view as corrupt. This can mean different things for conservative and progressive populists.

On the right, for example, it manifests in “America First” nationalism, isolationism, and the distrust of experts and the news media. On the left, it manifests in the distrust of the traditional party establishment as well as of business interests and mainstream commentators. That is why populists on both sides of the horseshoe generally distrust the traditional mainstream press and its elite talking heads and frequently seek out information from more ostensibly independent and explicitly ideologically aligned sources. It also pushes people inward, toward an isolationism rooted in the belief that when the United States gets involved abroad, it does so in the interests of the country’s political or business elite.

In both cases, it foments a contrarianism that is perhaps most visible on issues where there is a rare national consensus, such as support for Ukraine. In this case, the contrasting motivations of left and right populists lead both sides to reach the same position: one that “both-sides” the war in Ukraine, denies Ukrainians agency, and plays right into Putin’s hands. And this, despite the fact that there is nothing inherent in either far-right or far-left thought that leads to support for Russia or opposition to the plight of Ukrainians.

So perhaps, horseshoe theory as Faye conceptualized it isn’t entirely correct. It is not that the ends of the political spectrum inherently bend toward each other—in other words, that communists and fascists inherently align. If anything, the ends of the political spectrum tend toward broad heterogeneity in opinions. Rather, it is that the populist, anti-establishment impulse on both ends breaks off slivers of adherents who find themselves brought into agreement despite their ideologies.

It doesn’t, of course, help that the traditional, unidimensional political spectrum is itself a flawed heuristic for understanding the totality of people’s political commitments, especially in a country like the United States, where asking for a modicum of welfare state expansion toward an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development standard marks one as a leftist and denying the results of democratic elections makes one a fairly mainstream right winger.

Yet the prevalence of a certain populism on both the left and right, which shapes debates online and in the media as well as the political messaging and policy priorities of Democratic and Republican politicians alike show that not just the political landscape but the nature of political discourse is deeply fractured. This is not simply a question of polarization but of something deeper: the increasing nonexistence of a shared understanding of political reality. Ukraine, rather than a protagonist in this trend, is just a bellwether of things to come.

— Jan Dutkiewicz is a policy fellow at the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law and Policy Program at Harvard Law School. Dominik Stecuła is an assistant professor of political science at Colorado State University.

4 notes · View notes

honeyleesblog · 11 months

Text

Unlocking the Zodiac Sign and Personalities of Those Born on May 5

They can be very broad and have magnificent outcomes in areas of science and theory. Nonetheless, it ought to be added that they additionally have imaginative ability. Notwithstanding their adoration for serious examinations, they show a ton of instinct and great taste. Where others stagger in obscurity, these individuals see their way clear as sunlight, because of their inward power. His abilities and functional achievement are shocking. They grow step by step, with incredible insight that accompanies age; they energetically concentrate on nature and life. They are profoundly strict, with assorted interests and feelings. They likewise stimulate compassion in their current circumstance. Very liberal. Their instinct permits them to find nature and its mysteries. The thought processes in their activities come from the climate. They have a specific inclination to forlornness and disengagement. Nonetheless, they are in many cases encircled by their companions. Albeit these individuals are not searching for anybody, they are needed by others. The imperfections of this birthday: On the off chance that those brought into the world on this day are not ethically evolved, they are however energetic as they may be impulsive. What they like today, they could totally dispose of tomorrow. Unlocking the Zodiac Sign and Personalities of Those Born on May 5

In the event that your birthday is on May 5, your zodiac sign is Taurus May 5 - character and character character: respectable, pardoning, charitable, desolate, chicken on a fundamental level, extreme; calling: tailor, veterinarian, writer; colors: brown, olive, orange; stone: emerald; creature: squirrel; plant: African violet; fortunate numbers: 16,18,25,45,50,56 very fortunate number: 17 Occasions and observances - May 5 African World Legacy Day Holland: Freedom Day Global Birthing assistant Day Mexico: Cinco de Mayo, recognizing the skirmish of Puebla, where Mexicans confronted the French, the first being the victors. Region of Buenos Aires (Argentina): Buenos Aires Author's Day (honoring the vanishing of Haroldo Conti). Worldwide Day of the Battle for the Freedom of Weed Denmark: Freedom Day Global Celiac Sickness Day Japan: Youngsters' Day Ethiopia: Freedom Day May 5 Superstar Birthday. Who was conceived that very day as you? 1908: Kurt Bდ¶hme, German bassist. 1908: Jacques Massu, French military (d. 2002). 1911: Andor Lilienthal, Hungarian chess player (d. 2010). 1913: Lola Lemos, Spanish entertainer (d. 2009) .3? 1914 - Tyrone Power, American entertainer (d. 1958). 1915: Alice Faye, American entertainer. 1915: Tom Hungerford, Australian author (d. 2011). 1919: Georgios Papadopoulos, Greek legislator. 1921: Arthur Leonard Schawlow, American physicist, 1981 Nobel Prize champ for material science. 1924: Leopoldo Torre Nilsson, Argentine movie producer. 1926: Ann B. Davis, American entertainer (d. 2014). 1931: Greg, Belgian visual artist. 1932: Antonio Agri, Argentine violin player, guide and arranger (f. 1998). 1937: Giovan Battista Pirovano, Italian footballer (d. 2014). 1940: Spear Henriksen, American entertainer. 1942: Marდa Cristina Gდ³mez, people group pioneer and Salvadoran instructor killed by the Public authority (f. 1989). 1942: Joaquდn Leguina, Spanish lawmaker and author. 1943: Michael Palin, English entertainer and author. 1943: Raphael (Rafael Martos), Spanish vocalist and entertainer. 1944: Bo Larsson, Swedish footballer. 1944: John Rhys-Davies, Welsh entertainer. 1945: Cდ©sar Alierta, Spanish money manager. 1947: Malam Bacai Sanhდ¡, Bissauguinean president (d. 2012). 1948: Bill Ward, English performer of Dark time of rest. 1950: Samir Kassir, Lebanese writer and instructor (d. 2005). 1950: Leticia Moreira, Uruguayan entertainer. 1951: Ron Arad, Israeli originator, craftsman and modern designer. 1956: Jean Pierre Noher, French-Argentine entertainer. 1957: Peter Howitt, English entertainer and movie producer. 1957: Pდa Uribelarrea, Argentine entertainer. 1959: Ian McCulloch, English vocalist, of the band Reverberation and the Bunnymen. 1960: Jorge Quiroga Ramდrez, previous leader of Bolivia 1961: Pedro Reyes, Spanish humorist. 1963: James LaBrie, Canadian vocalist, of the band Dream Theater. 1966: Shawn Drover, Canadian performer, of the band Megadeth. 1967: Maximiliano Guerra, Argentine artist. 1970: Sviatoslav Shevchuk, Russian diocese supervisor. 1971: Cristian Aldana, Argentine performer. 1971: Florencia Bonelli, Argentine author. 1972: Devin Townsend, Canadian performer and author. 1973: David Janer, Spanish entertainer. 1976: Juan Pablo Sorდn, Argentine footballer. 1978: Santiago Cabrera, Chilean entertainer. 1980: Albert Lopo, Spanish footballer. 1980: Yossi Benayoun, Israeli footballer. 1981: Craig David, English vocalist. 1981: Mariano Gonzდ¡lez, Argentine soccer player. 1983: Joan Verdდº, Spanish footballer. 1983: Henry Cavill, English entertainer. 1986: Pedro Antonio Centuriდ³n, an Argentine kid killed at 14 years old while automatically satisfying obligatory military help in Paraguay (f. 2001) .4? 5? 1987: Marija ვ estiე‡, Bosnian vocalist. 1987: Graham Dorrans, Scottish footballer. 1988: Skye Sweetnam, Canadian vocalist. 1988: Adele, English vocalist. 1989: Chris Brown, American vocalist. 1989: Larissa Wilson, English entertainer. 1990: Melody Ji Eun, South Korean vocalist. 1991: Colin Edwards, Guyanese footballer (f. 2013). 1991: Raდºl Jimდ©nez, Mexican soccer player. 1991: Shubha Phutela, Indian entertainer and model (d. 2012). 1992: Danny Sea, Venezuelan vocalist and maker. 1999: Nathan Chen, American ice skater.

0 notes

angelanatel · 1 year

Photo

Identitarismo - Les Identitarians

França, anos 60

O movimento identitário ou identitarianismo é um movimento de extrema-direita popularizado na Europa pós segunda guerra, afirmava o direito dos povos de origem europeia a uma cultura e territórios exclusivaos. Tem origem na linda e liberal... França baseando-se nas ideias da moderna filosofia alemã, a partir dos anos 60 tem a contribuição de Alain de Benoist, Dominique Venner, Guillaume Faye e Renaud Camus. Acreditam que existem modos de vida que são típicos a seus povos. São influenciados pela Revolução Conservadora Alemã e pelas teorias do Terceiro Reich através da Nova Direita Européia.

Alguns identitários defendem explicitamente a xenofobia e o racialismo. A maioria limita as declarações públicas a uma linguagem mais dócil e ao dog whistle. Promovem a criação de estados brancos, e políticas de exclusão de migrantes e residentes não-brancos. O Movimento Identitário foi classificado em 2019 pelo Gabinete Federal para a Proteção da Constituição alemã como ideologicamente pertencente ao extremismo de direita.

Tem influência entre os nacionalistas brancos da América do Norte, Austrália e Nova Zelândia O Southern Poverty Law Center, baseado nos EUA, considera muitas dessas organizações como grupos de ódio .

Camus, Jean-Yves; Lebourg, Nicolas (2017). Far-Right Politics in Europe (em inglês). [S.l.]: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674971530

Camus, Jean-Yves (2019). «Alain de Benoist and the New Right». In: Sedgwick, Mark. Key Thinkers of the Radical Right: Behind the New Threat to Liberal Democracy (em inglês). [S.l.]: Oxford University Press. pp. 73–90. ISBN 9780190877613

Mudde, Cas (2019). The Far Right Today (em inglês). [S.l.]: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-5095-3685-6

Taguieff, Pierre-André (2015). La revanche du nationalisme: Néopopulistes et xénophobes à l'assaut de l'Europe (em francês). [S.l.]: Presses Universitaires de France. ISBN 978-2-13-072950-1

Teitelbaum, Benjamin R. (2017). Lions of the North: Sounds of the New Nordic Radical Nationalism (em inglês). [S.l.]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-021259-9

Vejvodová, Petra (Setembro de 2014). The Identitarian Movement – renewed idea of alternative Europe (PDF). ECPR General Conference (em inglês). Masaryk University, Brno: Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Studies. Consultado em 10 de maio de 2017

Virchow, Fabian (2015). «The 'Identitarian Movement': What Kind of Identity? Is it Really a Movement?». In: Simpson, Patricia Anne; Druxes, Helga. Digital Media Strategies of the Far Right in Europe and the United States (em inglês). Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. pp. 177–90. ISBN 978-0739198810

Zúquete, José Pedro (2018). The Identitarians: The Movement against Globalism and Islam in Europe. [S.l.]: University of Notre Dame Press. ISBN 9780268104245

Pesquise antes de aplaudir qualquer coisa na internet.

Acesse mais materiais relacionados em https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vo8MKiu2H07V_wtJV_Fn6w-9St0cxXBl

Siga e aprenda com https://twitter.com/suelifeliz

0 notes

moinchuk · 1 year

Video

Jean Michel Blais - Passepied from Adrian Villagomez on Vimeo.

Director – Adrian Villagomez DOP – Juliette Lossky Assistant director – Charlotte Danais 1st AC – Olivier Aubé Steadicam operator – Kes Tagney Chief Gaffer – Pierre-Luc Jobin Chier Grip – Brice Bodson Grip – Ludovic Pilon Swing – Tom Berthelot Best-Boy – David Booth Choreographer – Lauri-Ann Lauzon Stylist – Marianne Blais Stylist – Cloé Fortier Styling Assistant -Sophie Vincelette HMU – Arianne Tremblay HMU – MaryJane Khalif HMU assistant – Amanda Doucet Production : Consulat Producer – Elyse Belmont-Stroh Production coordinator – Samuel Petitclerc Production assistant – Nicholas Gonos Production assistant – Tiffany St-Surin Site conservation technicians – Samuel Villagomez Site conservation technicians – Timour Site conservation technicians – Marie Pontais Site conservation technicians – Mathilde Thomas Offline editor – Vinoth Varatharajan Online editor – Adrian Villagomez Color grading – Simon Boissoneaux

CAST Protagonist – Sacha Barbants Antagonist – Vladimir Belova-Mourkes Artist – Jean-Michel Blais Danser – Jordan Faye Danser – Brittney Gering Danser – Misheel Ganbold Danser – Nicholas Bellefleur Figuration – Amanda Doucet Figuration – Charlie Kunce Figuration – Devon Bates Figuration – Emma Cocchrane Figuration – Gabriel Cordova Figuration – Laurent Bélanger Figuration – Malaika Raymond Figuration – Ludovic Balmir Figuration – Marilou Richer Figuration – Paolo Marmin Figuration – Dominic Harrisson Danis Figuration – Arnaud Barbants Figuration – Larissa

SUPPLIER Mtl Grande – camera equipment Cineground – Camera equipment Cinepool – Cinema equipment Multi service luna – protection equipment MainFilm - 16 mm camera MELS – 16 mm dev + scan

SPECIAL THANKS La Belle Tonki and the Keenan Residence L'École Supérieure de ballet du Québec

0 notes

alexlacquemanne · 1 year

Text

Décembre MMXXII

Films

Détective privé (Harper) (1966) de Jack Smight avec Paul Newman, Lauren Bacall, Janet Leigh, Robert Wagner, Julie Harris, Shelley Winters et Pamela Tiffin

Le Grand Sommeil (The Big Sleep) (1946) de Howard Hawks avec Humphrey Bogart, Lauren Bacall, John Ridgely, Martha Vickers, Dorothy Malone et Peggy Knudsen

Rebecca (1940) d'Alfred Hitchcock avec Laurence Olivier, Joan Fontaine, George Sanders, Judith Anderson, Nigel Bruce et Reginald Denny

Le Baron de l'écluse (1960) de Jean Delannoy avec Jean Gabin, Micheline Presle, Jacques Castelot, Aimée Mortimer, Jean Constantin, Blanchette Brunoy et Jean Desailly

La Femme d'à côté (1981) de François Truffaut avec Gérard Depardieu, Fanny Ardant, Henri Garcin, Michèle Baumgartner : Arlette Coudray et Véronique Silver

De la part des copains (Cold Sweat) (1970) de Terence Young avec Charles Bronson, Liv Ullmann, James Mason, Jill Ireland, Jean Topart et Michel Constantin

Un Américain à Paris (An American in Paris) (1951) de Vincente Minnelli avec Gene Kelly, Leslie Caron, Oscar Levant, Georges Guétary et Nina Foch

L'Odyssée de l'African Queen (The African Queen) (1951) de John Huston avec Humphrey Bogart, Katharine Hepburn, Robert Morley, Peter Bull et Theodore Bikel

L'Arnaqueur (The Hustler) (1961) de Robert Rossen avec Paul Newman, Piper Laurie, Jackie Gleason et George C. Scott et Myron McCormick

L'Express du colonel Von Ryan (Von Ryan's Express) (1965) de Mark Robson avec Frank Sinatra, Trevor Howard, Raffaella Carrà, Brad Dexter, Sergio Fantoni et Edward Mulhare

L'Adorable Voisine (Bell, Book and Candle) (1958) de Richard Quine avec James Stewart, Kim Novak, Jack Lemmon, Ernie Kovacs, Hermione Gingold et Elsa Lanchester

Hannibal (Annibale) (1959) de Carlo Ludovico Bragaglia et Edgar G. Ulmer avec Victor Mature, Rita Gam, Mario Girotti et Carlo Pedersoli, Gabriele Ferzetti et Milly Vitale

Cléopâtre (Cleopatra) (1963) de Joseph L. Mankiewicz avec Elizabeth Taylor, Richard Burton, Rex Harrison, Roddy McDowall, Pamela Brown, George Cole et Martin Landau

Astérix et Cléopâtre (1968) de René Goscinny et Albert Uderzo avec Roger Carel, Jacques Morel, Micheline Dax, Lucien Raimbourg, Pierre Tornade et Bernard Lavalette

Les Trois Mousquetaires (The Three Musketeers) (1973) de Richard Lester avec Oliver Reed, Raquel Welch, Richard Chamberlain, Michael York, Frank Finlay, Christopher Lee, Geraldine Chaplin, Jean-Pierre Cassel, Faye Dunaway et Charlton Heston

On l'appelait Milady (The Four Musketeers: Milady's Revenge) (1974) de Richard Lester avec Oliver Reed, Frank Finlay, Richard Chamberlain, Michael York, Raquel Welch, Christopher Lee et Faye Dunaway

Salomon et la Reine de Saba (Solomon and Sheba) (1959) de King Vidor avec Yul Brynner, Gina Lollobrigida, George Sanders, Marisa Pavan, Finlay Currie et David Farrar

Avatar : La Voie de l'eau (Avatar: The Way of Water) (2022) de James Cameron avec Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Britain Dalton, Chloe Coleman et Stephen Lang

Fantômas (1964) d'André Hunebelle avec Jean Marais, Raymond Pellegrin, Louis de Funès, Mylène Demongeot, Jacques Dynam, Robert Dalban et Marie-Hélène Arnaud

Fantômas se déchaîne (1965) d'André Hunebelle avec Louis de Funès, Jean Marais, Mylène Demongeot, Jacques Dynam et Robert Dalban

Derrick contre Superman (Eine grosse Fünf) (1992) de Michel Hazanavicius et Dominique Mézerette avec Patrick Burgel et Évelyne Grandjean

La Classe américaine : Le Grand Détournement (1993) de Michel Hazanavicius et Dominique Mézerette avec Christine Delaroche, Evelyne Grandjean, Marc Cassot, Patrick Guillemin, Raymond Loyer et Jean-Claude Montalban

Séries

Inspecteur Barnaby Saison 7, 21, 22, 20, 10

Les Femmes de paille - Le monstre du lac - Epouvantables épouvantails - Les Lions de Causton - La Randonnée de la mort - La monnaie de leur pièce - Le couperet de la justice - Les Sorcières d'Angel's Rise

Friends Saison 1, 2, 3

Celui qui déménage - Celui qui est perdu - Celui qui a un rôle - Celui avec George - Celui qui lave plus blanc - Celui qui est verni - Celui qui a du jus - Celui qui hallucine - Celui qui parle au ventre de sa femme - Celui qui singeait - Celui qui était comme les autres - Celui qui aimait les lasagnes - Celui qui fait des descentes dans les douches - Celui qui avait un cœur d'artichaut - Celui qui pète les plombs - Celui qui devient papa : 1re partie - Celui qui devient papa : 2e partie - Celui qui gagnait au poker - Celui qui a perdu son singe - Celui qui a un dentiste carié - Celui qui avait un singe - Celui qui rêve par procuration - Celui qui a failli rater l'accouchement - Celui qui fait craquer Rachel - Celui qui a une nouvelle fiancée - Celui qui détestait le lait maternel - Celui qui est mort dans l'appart du dessous - Celui qui avait viré de bord - Celui qui se faisait passer pour Bob - Celui qui a oublié un bébé dans le bus - Celui qui tombe des nues - Celui qui a été très maladroit - Celui qui cassait les radiateurs - Celui qui se dédouble - Celui qui n'apprécie pas certains mariages - Celui qui retrouve son singe : 1re partie - Celui qui retrouve son singe : 2e partie - Celui qui a failli aller au bal de promo - Celui qui a fait on ne sait quoi avec Rachel - Celui qui vit sa vie - Celui qui remplace celui qui part - Celui qui disparaît de la série - Celui qui ne voulait pas partir - Celui qui se met à parler - Celui qui affronte les voyous - Celui qui faisait le lien - Celui qui attrape la varicelle - Celui qui embrassait mal - Celui qui rêvait de la princesse Leia - Celui qui a du mal à se préparer - Celui qui avait la technique du câlin - Celui qui ne supportait pas les poupées - Celui qui bricolait - Celui qui se souvient - Celui qui était prof et élève - Celui qui avait pris un coup sur la tête - Celui pour qui le foot c'est pas le pied - Celui qui fait démissionner Rachel - Celui qui ne s'y retrouvait plus - Celui qui était très jaloux - Celui qui persiste et signe - Celui que les prothèses ne gênaient pas - Celui qui vivait mal la rupture - Celui qui a survécu au lendemain

Alexandra Ehle Saison 3

Sans visage

Coffre à Catch

#92 : Kane tombe dans un traquenard ! - #93 : The Brothers of Destruction à la ECW ! - #94 : Edge, Kofi, Shelton : Catch Attack représent !" - #95 : Tac Tac c'est l'anniversaire d'Ichtou ! (feat. David Jouan)

The Rookie Saison 4

Dénouement - Toc toc toc - Les trois quêtes - Tir à vue - Témoins à abattre - Un meurtre pour de vrai - Négociation - Traîtres - Simone - Enervo

The Crown Saison 5

Comme un déjà vu - Le système - Mou Mou - Annus horribilis - Des précautions salutaires - La Maison Ipatiev - No woman's land - Une vraie poudrière - Couple numéro 31 - Déclassement

Columbo Saison 4, 3

Inculpé de meurtre - Play Back - Candidat au crime

Affaires Sensibles

Leonarda, l'adolescente qui a défié le président

Meurtres au paradis

Le fantôme de Noël

Spectacles

Bénabar : tournée des indociles (2022) au Cirque d'Amiens

Alain Souchon au Dôme de Paris (2022)

The Glenn Miller Orchestra Live at the Avalon Theatre (2021)

L'orchestre fait son cinéma au Zénith de Pau (2013)

Livres

La vengeance du Chat de Phillipe Geluck

Nota Bene, Tome 5 : La Mythologie Grecque de Benjamin Brillaud, Mathieu Mariolle, Phil Castaza et Joël Odone

Détective Conan, Tome 3 de Gôshô Aoyama

Mémoires d'un gros mytho de François Rollin et Stéphane Trapier

OSS 117 : Gâchis à Karachi de Jean Bruce

Tatiana K. Tome 3 : Le stygmate de Longinus de François Corteggiani et Emanuele Barison

Le tour du monde en quatre-vingts jours de Jules Verne

Kaamelott Tome 9 : Les renforts maléfiques de Alexandre Astier et Steven Dupré

The Clash en BD de Jean-Philippe Gonot et Gaëts

Le Voyage du Père Noël des Editions Korrigan

Astérix Tome24 : Astérix chez les Belges de René Goscinny et Albert Uderzo

Lucky Luke Tome 56 : Le ranch maudit de Morris, Claude Guylouis et Michel Janvier

#mediatheque #décembre22

0 notes