Tumgik
#Nationalist Congress Party
indianfasttrack · 3 days
Text
ट्रैफिक पुलिस की मनमानी के खिलाफ राष्ट्रवादी कांग्रेस पार्टी का विरोध
मुंबई में ट्रैफिक पुलिस की मनमानी से परेशान आम नागरिकों के लिए राष्ट्रवादी कांग्रेस पार्टी शरद पवार गुट ने उठाया ठोस कदम। अवैध चालान के खिलाफ पुलिसकर्मी पर कार्यवाही की मांग करते हुए चालान निरस्थ करने की मांग की है। (Nationalist Congress Party protests against the arbitrariness of the traffic police) इस्माईल शेखमुंबई- ट्रैफिक पुलिस की मनमानी के खिलाफ विरोध करते हुए, राष्ट्रवादी कांग्रेस पार्टी…
0 notes
bhaskarlive · 29 days
Text
Centre provides Z-Plus security cover to Sharad Pawar
Tumblr media
The Central government on Wednesday accorded the highest Z-Plus security cover to Nationalist Congress Party (SP) President Sharad Pawar, party officials said.
The Union Home Ministry has directed the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) to extend the highest level of VVIP armed security blanket to the veteran politician ahead of the Assembly elections in Maharashtra scheduled to be held later this year.
Source: bhaskarlive.in
0 notes
maharashtraelections · 2 months
Text
Who Should Lead Maharashtra in 2024
As the 2024 state assembly elections approach, the competition for Maharashtra’s next Chief Minister is intensifying. The political scene is abuzz with discussions about potential candidates and the direction the state’s leadership might take. Let’s explore the leading contenders and the elements that could sway their chances of securing the Chief Minister’s seat.
The Frontrunners
Sharad Pawar (Nationalist Congress Party — NCP)
Background: Sharad Pawar, a seasoned politician and the founder of the NCP, has been a key player in Maharashtra’s political arena for many years. Renowned for his political savvy and extensive experience, Pawar has been instrumental in shaping the state’s political landscape.
Prospects: Although Pawar himself might not be running for Chief Minister due to his age and health concerns, his influence within the NCP is likely to affect the party’s choice of candidate. His support is crucial for any potential leader within the party.
Ajit Pawar (NCP)
Background: Ajit Pawar, the nephew of Sharad Pawar, is a prominent figure in the NCP and has previously served as the Deputy Chief Minister of Maharashtra. Known for his administrative skills and strong presence in western Maharashtra, Ajit Pawar is a leading contender.
Prospects: Ajit Pawar’s leadership qualities and experience position him as a strong contender for the Chief Minister’s role. However, the outcome will depend on the party’s internal dynamics and alliances.
Chandrashekhar Bawankule (Bharatiya Janata Party — BJP)
Background: Chandrashekhar Bawankule, a senior BJP leader, has been actively involved in state politics and has held various ministerial positions in the past. He is recognized for his grassroots connections and organizational abilities.
Prospects: Bawankule’s strong organizational skills and loyalty to the party leadership make him a viable candidate. The BJP’s decision will hinge on their strategic approach and the dynamics of their alliances.
As the 2024 state assembly elections approach, the competition for Maharashtra’s next Chief Minister is intensifying. The political scene is abuzz with discussions about potential candidates and the direction the state’s leadership might take. Let’s explore the leading contenders and the elements that could sway their chances of securing the Chief Minister’s seat.
The Frontrunners
Sharad Pawar (Nationalist Congress Party — NCP)
Background: Sharad Pawar, a seasoned politician and the founder of the NCP, has been a key player in Maharashtra’s political arena for many years. Renowned for his political savvy and extensive experience, Pawar has been instrumental in shaping the state’s political landscape.
Prospects: Although Pawar himself might not be running for Chief Minister due to his age and health concerns, his influence within the NCP is likely to affect the party’s choice of candidate. His support is crucial for any potential leader within the party.
Ajit Pawar (NCP)
Background: Ajit Pawar, the nephew of Sharad Pawar, is a prominent figure in the NCP and has previously served as the Deputy Chief Minister of Maharashtra. Known for his administrative skills and strong presence in western Maharashtra, Ajit Pawar is a leading contender.
Prospects: Ajit Pawar’s leadership qualities and experience position him as a strong contender for the Chief Minister’s role. However, the outcome will depend on the party’s internal dynamics and alliances.
Chandrashekhar Bawankule (Bharatiya Janata Party — BJP)
Background: Chandrashekhar Bawankule, a senior BJP leader, has been actively involved in state politics and has held various ministerial positions in the past. He is recognized for his grassroots connections and organizational abilities.
Prospects: Bawankule’s strong organizational skills and loyalty to the party leadership make him a viable candidate. The BJP’s decision will hinge on their strategic approach and the dynamics of their alliances.
As the 2024 state assembly elections approach, the competition for Maharashtra’s next Chief Minister is intensifying. The political scene is abuzz with discussions about potential candidates and the direction the state’s leadership might take. Let’s explore the leading contenders and the elements that could sway their chances of securing the Chief Minister’s seat.
The Frontrunners
Sharad Pawar (Nationalist Congress Party — NCP)
Background: Sharad Pawar, a seasoned politician and the founder of the NCP, has been a key player in Maharashtra’s political arena for many years. Renowned for his political savvy and extensive experience, Pawar has been instrumental in shaping the state’s political landscape.
Prospects: Although Pawar himself might not be running for Chief Minister due to his age and health concerns, his influence within the NCP is likely to affect the party’s choice of candidate. His support is crucial for any potential leader within the party.
Ajit Pawar (NCP)
Background: Ajit Pawar, the nephew of Sharad Pawar, is a prominent figure in the NCP and has previously served as the Deputy Chief Minister of Maharashtra. Known for his administrative skills and strong presence in western Maharashtra, Ajit Pawar is a leading contender.
Prospects: Ajit Pawar’s leadership qualities and experience position him as a strong contender for the Chief Minister’s role. However, the outcome will depend on the party’s internal dynamics and alliances.
Chandrashekhar Bawankule (Bharatiya Janata Party — BJP)
Background: Chandrashekhar Bawankule, a senior BJP leader, has been actively involved in state politics and has held various ministerial positions in the past. He is recognized for his grassroots connections and organizational abilities.
Prospects: Bawankule’s strong organizational skills and loyalty to the party leadership make him a viable candidate. The BJP’s decision will hinge on their strategic approach and the dynamics of their alliances.
As the 2024 state assembly elections approach, the competition for Maharashtra’s next Chief Minister is intensifying. The political scene is abuzz with discussions about potential candidates and the direction the state’s leadership might take. Let’s explore the leading contenders and the elements that could sway their chances of securing the Chief Minister’s seat.
The Frontrunners
Sharad Pawar (Nationalist Congress Party — NCP)
Background: Sharad Pawar, a seasoned politician and the founder of the NCP, has been a key player in Maharashtra’s political arena for many years. Renowned for his political savvy and extensive experience, Pawar has been instrumental in shaping the state’s political landscape.
Prospects: Although Pawar himself might not be running for Chief Minister due to his age and health concerns, his influence within the NCP is likely to affect the party’s choice of candidate. His support is crucial for any potential leader within the party.
Ajit Pawar (NCP)
Background: Ajit Pawar, the nephew of Sharad Pawar, is a prominent figure in the NCP and has previously served as the Deputy Chief Minister of Maharashtra. Known for his administrative skills and strong presence in western Maharashtra, Ajit Pawar is a leading contender.
Prospects: Ajit Pawar’s leadership qualities and experience position him as a strong contender for the Chief Minister’s role. However, the outcome will depend on the party’s internal dynamics and alliances.
Chandrashekhar Bawankule (Bharatiya Janata Party — BJP)
Background: Chandrashekhar Bawankule, a senior BJP leader, has been actively involved in state politics and has held various ministerial positions in the past. He is recognized for his grassroots connections and organizational abilities.
Prospects: Bawankule’s strong organizational skills and loyalty to the party leadership make him a viable candidate. The BJP’s decision will hinge on their strategic approach and the dynamics of their alliances.
Eknath Shinde (Shiv Sena — Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena)
Background: Eknath Shinde is the current Chief Minister of Maharashtra and a key leader of the Shiv Sena (Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena). He has a significant following among the party’s members and has played a crucial role in major policy decisions.
Prospects: Shinde’s incumbency and leadership within his party position him as a formidable candidate. His ability to navigate coalition politics will be essential for his re-election.
Devendra Fadnavis (BJP)
Background: Devendra Fadnavis, a former Chief Minister of Maharashtra and a senior BJP leader, is celebrated for his administrative skills and focus on development. He enjoys a strong base within the BJP and among the voters.
Prospects: Fadnavis’s experience as a former Chief Minister and his popularity within the BJP position him as a strong contender. His capacity to forge alliances and his record will significantly influence his prospects.
Uddhav Thackeray (Shiv Sena — UBT)
Background: Uddhav Thackeray, the leader of Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray), has previously served as the Chief Minister of Maharashtra. He is known for his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and his focus on regional issues.
Prospects: Thackeray’s leadership during the pandemic and his emphasis on regional matters have made him a notable candidate. His ability to lead during challenging times and his approach to governance will be critical for his success.
Nana Patole (Indian National Congress — INC)
Background: As the head of the Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee and a key figure in the Congress party, Nana Patole is deeply engaged in state politics and has a solid connection with the grassroots level.
Prospects: Patole’s leadership in the Congress and his popularity among the rural voters position him as a possible candidate. The success of the Congress in the upcoming elections and their strategic partnerships are vital factors.
Raj Thackeray (Maharashtra Navnirman Sena — MNS)
Background: Raj Thackeray, the leader of the MNS, is recognized for his passionate oratory and firm stance on issues related to the region. He enjoys a loyal following, especially in cities.
Prospects: Thackeray’s skill in rallying support around regional matters and his charismatic leadership suggest he could be a strong contender. However, his prospects hinge on the MNS’s performance and the alliances they form.
The Mahayuti (Grand Alliance) Factor
The Mahayuti, or Grand Alliance, which includes the BJP, Shiv Sena (Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena), and other associated parties, will play a crucial role in the upcoming elections. The decision on who to nominate as the Chief Ministerial candidate will be shaped by their joint strategy and the effort to maintain a balance among the coalition’s various interests.
https://maharashtraelection2024.com/contest/who-should-be-maharashtras-next-chief-minister/
1 note · View note
daily-quiz-join · 3 months
Text
दरवाजे खुले हैं, भतीजे अजित के खेमे के विधायकों को वापस लेने पर बोले शरद पवार
Creative Common मीडिया से बात करते हुए एनसीपी के दिग्गज नेता ने कहा कि जो विधायक संगठन को मजबूत करने में मदद करेंगे या पार्टी की छवि को नुकसान नहीं पहुंचाएंगे, उन्हें लिया जाएगा। राष्ट्रवादी कांग्रेस पार्टी (एनसीपी)-सपा प्रमुख शरद पवार ने मंगलवार को संकेत दिया कि उनकी पार्टी के दरवाजे उन विधायकों के लिए खुले हैं, जो भतीजे अजीत पवार के खेमे में चले गए, जिससे पार्टी में विभाजन हुआ। मीडिया से बात…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
kimskashmir · 28 days
Text
NCP to go solo in J&K Assembly election, likely to contest 12 seats
MUMBAI — Ajit Pawar-led Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) said on Friday that the party will contest the upcoming Assembly election in Jammu and Kashmir independently without any pre- and post-alliance with any political party. NCP is expected to contest about 12 seats there. NCP’s move is crucial as it wants to increase its presence across the country, especially after Ajit Pawar deserted Sharad…
0 notes
thenewdemocratus · 3 months
Text
Kurt Bardella & Joe Walsh: The Squad & MAGA
Source:Kurt Bardella talking about The Squad’s bad night. Source:The New Democrat “What Everyone Is Getting Wrong About Jamaal Bowman’s Loss in NY-16” From Kurt Bardella “Both parties have extremes. And both parties have members who go too far. But there’s a big, big, big difference in what “going too far” means in the Democratic Party and what it means in the Republican Party.” Source:White Flag…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
gajananjogdand45 · 8 months
Link
https://marmikmaharashtra.com/nationalist-congress-party-employment-and-self-employment-cell-district-president-padi-akbar-akhtar-sheikh/
0 notes
wilwheaton · 3 months
Quote
How did the court get so much power that it can overrule both Congress and the president, ignore efforts to hold justices accountable when they are nakedly corrupt, and overturn laws like our bribery statutes? Who put them in charge of America? The simple answer, as I lay out in detail in The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America, is that the justices gave that power to themselves. Not only is such power for the court not found anywhere in the Constitution, but Article 3, Section 2 explicitly puts the Supreme Court under the thumb of Congress, not the other way around: In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. [emphasis added] The Founders and Framers were very clear about this, even though that notorious liar Sam Alito wasn’t when he recently wrote in The Wall Street Journal: “No provision in the Constitution gives [Congress] the authority to regulate the Supreme Court—period.”
The Supreme Court Was Never Meant to Be Kings and Queens
This stolen, illegitimate, corrupt, right wing SCOTUS majority has no legal or moral right to impose its tyrannical, christian nationalist agenda on an entire nation. 
2K notes · View notes
robertreich · 3 months
Video
youtube
Why Trump Is Partnering With Christian Nationalists
Donald Trump is portraying himself as a religious savior. He says Election Day will be: …”the most important day in the history of our country, and it’s going to be Christian Visibility Day.”
Trump has repeatedly compared his criminal trials to the crucifixion of Jesus, promoted videos calling his reelection “the most important moment in human history,” and that describe him as a divinely appointed ruler.
He claims to be a holy warrior against an imaginary attack on Christianity.
TRUMP: They want to tear down crosses//But no one will be touching the cross of Christ under the Trump administration. I swear to you.
He’s even selling his own version of the Bible.
Trump is playing to a rising white Christian Nationalist movement within the Republican Party.
Christian Nationalists believe that the law of the land is not the Constitution, but instead the law of God as they interpret it. Under this view, atheists and people of other faiths (including Christians of other denominations) are all second-class citizens.
Trump’s supporters are increasingly overt in their calls to replace democracy with a MAGA theocracy.
The idea that the will of voters is irrelevant because God has anointed Trump was a recurring message in the efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
In previous videos, I’ve highlighted how MAGA Republicans have embraced core elements of fascism. They reject democracy, stoke fear of immigrants and minorities, embrace a gender and ethnic hierarchy, and look to a strongman to lead and defend them.
The combination of fascism and Christian Nationalism is called Christofascism, a term first used half a century ago by the theologian Dorothee Sölle. Fascists rise to power by characterizing their opponents as subhuman. Christofascists take it a step further by casting opponents as not just subhuman, but actually demonic.
Framing opponents as enemies of God makes violence against them not only seem justifiable, but divinely sanctioned, and almost inevitable.
Christofascists want to strip away a wide range of rights Americans take for granted. Former Trump staffers involved in developing plans for a second Trump term have called for imposing “Biblical” tests on immigration, overturning marriage equality, and restricting contraception.  
And MAGA-aligned judges are already setting their dogma ahead of the Constitution. In his concurring opinion on the case that declared frozen embryos are people, Alabama Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker cited God more than forty times and quoted the Book of Genesis and other religious texts.
Nothing could be more un-American than the Christian Nationalist vision. So many of America’s founders came here as refugees seeking religious freedom. The framers of the Constitution were adamant that religion had no role in our government. The words “God,” “Jesus,” and “Christ,” don’t appear anywhere in the Constitution. And the very first words of the Bill of Rights are a promise that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Christofascism, or any religion-based form of government, is a rejection of everything America has aspired to be — a secular, multi-racial society whose inhabitants have come from everywhere, bound together by a faith in equal opportunity, democracy, and the rule of law.
Beware.
502 notes · View notes
loving-n0t-heyting · 21 days
Text
if you want an illustration of the extent to which the anc in south africa has degenerated from its heroic period: for the last 3mo it has, to hold onto power, governed thru a coalition including not just the generically white Democratic Alliance but the inkatha freedom party and freedom front plus. the former is a conservative black party with deep historical ties to the bantustan system and with which the anc was engaged in literal open warfare during the 90s, to the point mandela would use association with them to tar the previously hegemonic and apartheid-based national party(!!); the latter is a far right whiteafrikaner nationalist party to emerge from racist elements of the apartheid-era military during the transition to full political democracy; both parties earned <4% of the vote share in this years elections each. all of this compromise with the remnants of the prior regime to suppress the influence of left-wing parties like the eff and mkp favouring large scale economic redistribution in the most unequal country in the entire world. (of individually owned land, the black supermajority of the populations owns a whopping four percent.) whatever one thinks about either party or its leaders, its hard to argue they are either of them less aligned with the founding spirit of the african natl congress than the ifp or ff+, the heirs to the military and paramilitary factions that made it their business to drown the anc in blood during its foundational struggle
this might seem bleak, but in reality it points a novel way forward for one of the most prominent and distinctive political problems in contemporary south africa, that of so called "load shedding" or (less euphemistically) rolling blackouts by eskom, the state-owned power company responsible for most electricity generation and distribution in the country. simply hook up a rotor between eskoms generators and nelson mandelas grave and soon enough you should have enough power 24/7 to blind any astronauts looking down at the southern tip of the continent
240 notes · View notes
zvaigzdelasas · 7 months
Text
With a history of short-term governments in Nepal’s 15 years of democratic progression, the current reconfiguration is no surprise, and it will be no surprise if the Maoists get back again with the Nepali Congress in months and years to come.
Power sharing, political discontent, ideological differences, underperformance, and pressure to restore Nepal to a Hindu state – a long list of reasons reportedly forced the Maoists to sever ties with the Nepali Congress. While the Nepali Congress expected the Maoist leader and current prime minister, Pushpa Kamal Dahal (also known by his nom de guerre, Prachanda) to leave the alliance, it did not expect an overnight turnaround. [...]
Dahal reportedly conveyed to the Nepali Congress chair, former Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba, that external pressure forced him to join hands with CPN-UML and form a new government.
If this assertion is true, China emerges as a plausible factor, given its historical inclination toward forging alliances with leftist parties in Nepal. This notion gains credence in light of China’s past efforts, such as its unsuccessful attempt in 2020 to mediate the conflict between Oli and Dahal.
On the other hand, India has enjoyed a comfortable working relationship with the Nepali Congress and the Maoists. Although Maoists were a challenging party for New Delhi to get along with when Dahal first gained the prime minister’s seat in 2008, the two have come a long way in working together. However, the CPN-UML has advocated closer ties with the northern neighbor China; Beijing suits both their ideological requirements and their ultra-nationalistic outlook – which is primarily anti-India. [...]
India faces challenges in aligning with the Left Alliance for two key reasons. First, the energy trade between Nepal and India has grown crucial over the past couple of years. However, India strictly purchases power generated through its own investments in Nepal, refusing any power produced with Chinese involvement. With the CPN-UML now in government, Nepal may seek alterations in this arrangement despite the benefits of power trade in reducing its trade deficit with India.
Second, India stands to lose the smooth cooperation it enjoyed with the recently dissolved Maoist-Congress coalition. During the dissolved government, the Nepali Congress held the Foreign Ministry, fostering a favorable equation for India. Just last month, Foreign Minister N.P. Saud visited India for the 9th Raisina Dialogue, engaging with top Indian officials, including his counterpart, S. Jaishankar.
As concerns arise for India regarding the Left Alliance, there is also potential for shifts in the partnership between Nepal and the United States, a significant development ally. Particularly, there may be a slowdown in the implementation of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) projects. Despite facing domestic and Chinese opposition, the Nepali Parliament finally approved a $500 million MCC grant from the United States in 2022, following a five-year delay.
China perceives the MCC as a component of the U.S.-led Indo-Pacific strategy, countering its BRI. Hence Beijing aims to increase Chinese loans and subsidies to Nepal to enhance its influence.
To conclude, the re-emergence of Nepal’s Left Alliance signals a shift in power dynamics, impacting domestic politics and regional geopolitics. With China’s influence growing, Nepal’s foreign policy may tilt further toward Beijing, challenging India’s interests. This shift poses challenges for India, particularly in trade and diplomatic relations, while also affecting Nepal’s partnerships with other key players like the United States.
[[The Author,] Dr. Rishi Gupta is the assistant director of the Asia Society Policy Institute, Delhi]
6 Mar 24
227 notes · View notes
Text
Apocalyptic rhetoric is just as dangerous as the violent kind
Tumblr media
Paul Waldman is absolutely correct about how the Republican's "apocalyptic rhetoric" about the Democrats could ultimately lead to violence just as much as the violent rhetoric. The GOP frames Democrats now as deliberately wanting to "destroy" America. (Ironically, it is the GOP who have turned toward autocracy and seem determined on establishing one party rule at all costs. This suggests that once again, Republicans are projecting onto Democrats.)
“I cannot stand these people that are destroying our country,” said Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) to a crowd of Donald Trump’s supporters at the Iowa State Fair this past weekend while the former president looked on approvingly. Gaetz then added: “Only through force do we make any change in a corrupt town like Washington, D.C.” The second part of that statement made headlines, as it’s not every day that a member of Congress advocates “force” to achieve political goals. But the first part ought to be just as troubling, because the two parts operate together. The idea that our opponents are purposely attempting to lay waste to America is often the justification for all kinds of radical action — violence very much included. Barely a day goes by without prominent Republicans repeating that claim. Trump regularly says his political opponents will “destroy the country,” or have already nearly destroyed it. It’s a staple of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s rhetoric. “If woke ideology takes over, it will destroy this country,” DeSantis says. If President Biden is reelected, the governor insists, “the left is gonna absolutely destroy this country.” [...] Yes, liberals have made dire warnings about a second Trump presidency. But that’s unique to Trump, who actually tried to overturn a lawful election and retain power, and last year called for the “termination” of the Constitution. So the assertion that if he became president it could mean the end of democracy is at least not too far-fetched.* The talk of the United States ending its run some time in the next few years because Democrats passed some modest expansion of health coverage or kept pushing for a transition to green energy, on the other hand, is bonkers. Yet, unlike other kinds of rhetorical calls to extremism, we don’t police it at all. Journalists tend to be very attuned to hints of political violence. When a candidate says he wants to start “slitting throats” in the federal government, as DeSantis recently did, we condemn it and explore its troubling implications. We press Republican contenders to admit that Biden fairly won the 2020 election and to repudiate the violent insurrection of Jan. 6, 2021. In contrast, we treat partisan apocalyptic rhetoric as mere hyperbole. But it’s the premise that turns anger into action. If you actually believed your opponents were literally trying to destroy your country, what wouldn’t be justified? Threatening election officials? Storming the Capitol? Assassinations? You might protest that Republican politicians don’t really believe this talk. But clearly, many of their supporters do. Which is no surprise given how often they’re told that it’s true. [...] Any rational Republican knows the truth about the next election: If Biden wins, it will mean nothing more than four years of policies they don’t like. That will be deeply unpleasant for them. But it won’t mean the end of America, and they shouldn’t be allowed to say so without challenge. We ought to treat apocalyptic rhetoric just like we treat violent rhetoric: Take note of it, condemn it, challenge candidates to defend it, and explain the threat it poses. Why? Because many of the voters who are listening think the Republicans spinning out wild tales of America’s imminent destruction mean what they say. [emphasis added]
____________ *In my opinion it isn't just Trump, many on the left have legitimate concerns about extreme right-wing Republicans like DeSantis and white Christian nationalists who seem to want autocracy/ one-party rule because they have either said and/or shown that they do.
458 notes · View notes
Trump and his sycophants have destroyed the Republican Party. They are no longer conservatives either fiscally or on foreign policy. They are a party of chaos beholden to the right-wing culture warrior oligarchs. They are the derogatory agents of those oligarchs and the corporations owned by them. They make decisions based on the whim of a deranged madman.
They have gone from being closet racists/bigots to being full blown Nazis that call for the extermination of their culture war scapegoats they call “vermin” (marginalized people/political rivals). They take this term directly from Hitler who they openly embrace in speech and writing. They no longer care about tax cuts for all but just for the 1% and corporations. They want endless wars to profit from and to distract and rally their deplorable base. They no longer want small, limited government but opt for a massive government that intrudes into its citizens private lives and tramples their freedoms.
The party of law and order is now a party of criminals, sex offenders, grifters, traitors, and murderous street thugs. They are proud of this and fund raise and merchandise from their lawlessness. They have bought control of what is now an illegitimate SCOTUS which never allows them to be held accountable.
They use the KKK, Neo-Nazi groups, armed right-wing militias, Neo-Confederates, and white supremacists to persecute their opponents and victims in the streets and inside the Capitol itself. They tell us to “get over it” when mindless gun violence decimates our families in every public venue from churches, to schools, to 4th of July celebrations, movie theaters, shopping malls, and even a Super Bowl parade.
The police, courts, and legislatures are infested with their white nationalist/supremacists and Christo-fascists. They openly take money from Russia and others to influence our foreign policy and economic policy. Money from Russia is funneled into the NRA and Congress to allow a massive proliferation of gun violence on our streets that destabilizes our society.
They claim to be the party of the military but they degrade and insult our troops and cast our veterans into the streets. They abandon our allies and our treaty obligations at the behest of foreign dictators that bribe them.
They bust our unions and pass laws to weaken or prevent organized labor. They are forcing society to become wage slaves with no security, insurance, or pensions. They force our workers into the “gig economy” where everyone works incredible hours 7 days a week at multiple jobs and still are left unable to afford rent or mortgages. Nearly the entire population is one or two paychecks away from being homeless.
Decades of trickle down economics has seen our tax dollars poured into the accounts of billionaires, millionaires, and corporations with not a penny trickling down to the working class. The middle class has been practically wiped out by cruel Republican legislation written by political think tanks established and funded by oligarchs. The only thing these pseudo-conservatives conserve is their own wealth.
This is late stage capitalism run amok. The economy has been drained and now the oligarchs and corporations are plundering the government. They have taken advantage of decades of right-wing propaganda proliferated by Fox News, conservatives talk radio, and internet podcasts that have brain washed the rural areas into blaming the Democrats that are trying help them while convincing them to vote for the Republicans who have impoverished them. The French Revolution in reverse.
They see the Orange Dictator as their last best chance to completely take over the government and create a kleptocracy that pulls the strings behind an autocracy that pretends to be a republic.
The chaos of the Republican puppets is to distract everyone from the takeover by the oligarchs, corporations, and deep pocketed foreign adversaries.
97 notes · View notes
lilithism1848 · 1 year
Text
Atrocities US committed against AFRICA
In early 2017, the US began conducting drone strikes in Somalia against Al Shabab militants. An attack on July 16th killed 8 people.
In 1998, the US bombed the Al Shifa pharmaceutical factory in Sudan, killing one employee and wounding 11. It was the largest pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum, producing medicine both for human and veterinary use. The US had acted on false evidence of a VX nerve agent from a single soil sample, and later used a false witness to cover for the attack. It was the only pharmaceutical factory in Africa not under US control.
In June 1982, with the help of CIA money and arms, Hissene Habre , dubbed Africa’s Pinochet, takes power in Chad. His secret police, use methods of torture including the burning the body of the detainee with incandescent objects, spraying gas into their eyes, ears and nose, forced swallowing of water, and forcing the mouths of detainees around the exhaust pipes of running cars. Habré’s government also periodically engaged in ethnic cleansing against groups such as the Sara, Hadjerai and the Zaghawa, killing and arresting group members en masse when it was perceived that their leaders posed a threat to the regime. Human Rights Watch claimed that Habre was responsible for thousands of killings. In 2001, while living in Senegal, he was almost tried for crimes committed by him in Chad. However, a court there blocked these proceedings. Then human rights people decided to pursue the case in Belgium, because some of Habre’s torture victims lived there. The U.S., in June 2003, told Belgium that it risked losing its status as host to NATO’s headquarters if it allowed such a legal proceeding to happen. So the result was that the law that allowed victims to file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad was repealed. However, two months later a new law was passed which made special provision for the continuation of the case against Habre. In May 2016 he was found guilty of human-rights abuses, including rape, sexual slavery and ordering the killing of 40,000 people, and sentenced to life in prison.
In the 1980s, Reagan maintains a close relationship with the Apartheid South african government, called constructive engagement, while secretly funding it in the hopes of creating a bulwark of anti-communism and preventing a marxist party from taking power, as happened in angola. Later on, in the wars against Apartheid in South Africa and Angola, in which cuban and anti-apartheid forces fought the white south african government, the US supplied south africa with nuclear weapons via Israel.
In 1975, Henry Kissinger launches a CIA-backed war in Angola, backing the brutal anti-communist leader of UNITAS, Jonas Savimbi, against Agostinho Neto and his Marxist-Leninst MPLA party, creating a civil war lasting for 30 years. The CIA financed a covert invasion via neighboring Zaire and a drive on the Angolan capital by the U.S. ally, South Africa. Congress continues to fund UNITAS, and their south-african apartheid allies until the late 1980s. By the end of the war, more than 500,000 people had died and over one million had been internally displaced.
In 1966, a CIA-backed military coup overthrows he widely popular Pan-Africanist and Marxist leader Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana, inviting the International Monetary Fund and World Bank to take a lead role in managing the economy. With this reversal, accentuated by the expulsion of immigrants and a new willingness to negotiate with apartheid South Africa, Ghana lost a good deal of its stature in the eyes of African nationalists.
In 1965, a CIA-backed military coup installs Mobutu Sese Seko, described as the “archetypal African dictator” in Congo. The hated and repressive Mobutu exploits his desperately poor country for billions.
In 1962, a tip from a CIA spy in South Africa lead to the imprisonment of Nelson Mandela, due to his pro-USSR leanings. This began his 27-year-long imprisonment.
In 1961, the CIA assists in the assassination of the democratically elected congolese leader Patrice Lumumba, throwing the country into years of turmoil. Before his assassination the CIA sent one of its scientists, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, to the Congo carrying “lethal biological material” intended for use in Lumumba’s assassination. This virus would have been able to produce a fatal disease indigenous to the Congo area of Africa and was transported in a diplomatic pouch.
In 1801, and again in 1815, the US aided Sweden in subjugating a series of coastal towns in North Africa, in the Barbary Wars. The stated reason was to crack down on pirates, but the wars destroyed the navies of Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco, and secured European and US shipping routes for goods and slaves in North Africa. US Representatives stated: “When we can appear in the Ports of the various Powers, or on the Coast, of Barbary, with Ships of such force as to convince those nations that We are able to protect our trade, and to compel them if necessary to keep faith with Us, then, and not before, We may probably secure a large share of the Meditn trade, which would largely and speedily compensate the U. S. for the Cost of a maritime force amply sufficient to keep all those Pirates in Awe, and also make it their interest to keep faith.” Thomas Jefferson echoed and carried out the war, saying that war was essential to securing markets along the Barbary Coast.
193 notes · View notes
thenewdemocratus · 3 months
Text
Boris Sanchez: 'Steve Bannon Makes Longshot Request to Supreme Court to Avoid Prison'
Source:CNN talking about convicted felon & soon to be prison inmate Steve Bannon. Source:The New Democrat “Steve Bannon, a conservative podcast host and former strategist for Donald Trump, asked the Supreme Court to pause his prison sentence while he appeals his conviction for contempt of Congress. Bannon’s former attorney David Schoen weighs in.” From CNN “Who can use executive…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
mapsontheweb · 4 months
Photo
Tumblr media
A more detailed Indian election results.
by u/Greedy-Rate-349
Bharatiya Janata party loses its majority after 10 years and has to depend on allies to form a government which wasn't predicted by any exit polls which were claiming that BJP will alone get over 350 seats and thus the result has been celebrated by the opposition despite its defeat and they also managed to capture many seats on BJP's strongholds specifically in UP
Translations
Bharatiya Janata party - Hindi for Indian people's party
Telugu Desam Party -Telugu for Party of the Telugu Lands
Janata dal United -Hindi for People's party United
Trinamool Congress - Bengali for Grassroots Congress
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam - Tamil for Dravidian progressive alliance
Samajwadi party -Hindi for Socialist party
Other parties include a long list as well some major NDA allies were - Lok Janshakti party(Ram Vilas), Shiv Sena, National Congress party, Janata dal (secular), Rashtriya lok dal,Asom Gana Parishad
Other major INDIA parties include- Rashtriya Janata dal Shiv sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) Nationalist Congress party (Sharadchandra Pawar faction) Communist party of India (Marxist) Communist party of India Communist party of India (Marxist Leninist) Liberation Aam Aadmi party Jammu Kashmir National Conference Jharkhand Mukti Morcha
Also two unaligned Chandrashekhar Azad of the Azad Samajwadi party (Kanshiram) and Pappu Yadav have announced that they will support INDIA bloc.
Parties like JDU and TDP have a history of love hate relationship with NDA and there is speculation that they might jump ship that can topple BJP, however no such news has come forward and we will have to see what comes next
47 notes · View notes