Tumgik
#Neo-Nazism
djscratch · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
American History X (1998) dir. Tony Kaye
132 notes · View notes
mkultrafied · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The New Black and Brown Shirts, Armeerundschau Aug '86 issue
4 notes · View notes
jolikmc-thoughts · 6 months
Text
Tagged as "Mature" just in case someone whines to "Papa Tumblr".
So, I watched the "infamous" episode of Spider-Man and His Amazing Friends, "Quest of The Red Skull". I'm not exactly sure why Disney+ doesn't have this episode listed. Even after I watched it from start to finish, the worst thing I saw, in my ignorant opinion, was a stereotyping of Native American heritage (chanting, "me talk like this", spirit abilities, et cetera) but in a positive way (the character was one of the "good guys"). Maybe I'm dumb. Or maybe the world is just overly sensitive about certain topics.
… such as Nazis.
As I said, I watched the episode. I even kept a list of the things that I saw which might "offend" someone. The list is as follows:
Native American stereotypes (mentioned)
Nazi / Adolf Hitler worship
Some Nazi swastikas
One call of "Heil, Hitler!", two calls of "Heil, Red Skull!"
A brief history on Adolf Hitler and his ambitions during World War II
Talk of starting World War III and controlling the entire world
I have to legitimate ask, not as a "dumb kid", but as a confused adult, what's so objectionable about any of this? Why remove the episode entirely? Why not just slap one of those frilly little "it was wrong then and it's wrong now" warnings on it and call it good? Oh. Right. Hitler.
You know, this "Hitler embargo" thing reminds me a lot of the whole "Voldemort" thing from the Harry Potter series. "We must not mention his name". Well, why not? He was a part of that world's history and the true embodiment of evil, but it's not like saying his name would will him back into existence.
Similarly, saying "Adolf Hitler" or showing his twisted legacy isn't going to suddenly bring about World War III. And if a piece of old media portrays Hilter and his followers as they were, as opposed to trying to "glorify" the horrors that happened, then why try and bury it?
There have been good people in history and there have been bad. That's life. Hiding the dredges of humanity doesn't magically make them disappear. Simple as that.
3 notes · View notes
hellyeahheroes · 9 months
Text
youtube
Kellie-Jay and the Neo-Nazis by Shaun
2 notes · View notes
elladastinkardiamou · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
This week's newsletter from AthensLive is out:
* You’ll be taxed as a tax evader. It doesn’t matter if you are not
* Being “large” with the TV channels
* Something is terribly wrong with the Greek Police
Assuming that all half a million self-employed professionals in Greece are tax evaders, the government decided to tax them accordingly. Only it won’t work. This happened at a time when the Greeks had drastically cut consumption of essential goods due to economic hardship. 
There is no money for welfare policies, but there is always money for the TV channels. The government would now pay all their debt to the insurance fund -some 6.8 million- on the basis they were affected by… the war in Ukraine.
A 16-year-old girl was found unconscious with serious head injuries after an anti-fascist concert when clashes with the police erupted. The coroner’s report severely doubted the Greek police’s version of events. Later in the week, neofascists attempted to set people on fire in the Metro. When the police finally intervened, they threw tear gas.  
Read and share this week's updates on the events and developments in Greece here: https://steadyhq.com/en/athenslivegr/posts/d8a70182-849d-44ba-a8b2-460eebc45e12
For anyone with a wish or need to follow and to gain an insight into recent events in Greece and to read and support independent and investigative journalism in English, the weekly newsletter from AthensLive should be a core element in the reading flow.
If you want the best overview of the events and developments in Greece right now, this is the place to go. Not the mainstream Greek news, but independent journalism with sharp analysis and links to interesting and important topics from a variety of sources.
Become a member and get the newsletter in your inbox every week here:
https://steadyhq.com/en/athenslivegr/newsletter/sign_up
2 notes · View notes
noddytheornithopod · 1 year
Text
The fact that literal Neo-Nazis are sending death threats to Lidia Thorpe - who is vocally opposing the Voice - despite probably supporting a No vote themselves shows this isn't about some binary Yes and No with clear sides.
What they want is to destroy any progress for Aboriginal people, and while some onlookers might wonder why they're probably going to vote the same way, it's clear it's about far more than just some powerless tokenistic Voice.
These Neo-Nazis see Lidia Thorpe unashamedly advocating for Blak sovereignty, and are threatened by it. They probably see genuine sovereignty activism as a greater threat to their goals than the Voice is.
I'm not Indigenous so I can't know the true lived experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but I really do feel for everyone who is going through hell because of this referendum.
When I saw the Voice being pushed, I knew this is what would happen. The fact that a proposal that's nothing at best and assimilationist at worst is causing so much hurt to Indigenous people with such a toxic debate is sickening.
People like Lidia Thorpe should not have to face death threats for speaking truth to power and advocating for decolonisation. "Australia" should be seeing this and realising how fucked up things really have become - have ALWAYS been - for Indigenous people.
Let's be real, this country that is literally illegal isn't even ready to have a mature, nuanced discussion about this, anyway.
2 notes · View notes
athis333 · 3 months
Text
War-time commissions for the Nazis
While never an official member of the Nazi Party, Breker took commissions from the Nazis from 1933 through 1942, including those for sculptures erected outside of Berlin's Olympic Stadium for the 1936 games. The sculptures are still there today.
After the war, the allies destroyed almost 90 percent of Breker's work and in 1948 he was designated as a "fellow traveler" of the Nazis and fined. He continued to work and exhibit but controversy dogged him for the remainder of his career, despite protestations that he had never been a supporter of Nazi ideology, but had simply accepted their patronage.
However, during the 1970's Breker was awarded the "Honorary Golden Ring" by the German Cultural Center of the European Spirit (DKEG), an organization founded in 1950 by former National Socialists to promote the elites of Nazi society. In 1980 he received the "Ulrich von Hutten Medal" from the Society for Free Journalism, the largest right-wing extremist cultural association in Germany, established by former Nazi and SS officers after the war.
Breker's widow Charlotte confirmed to Stern that her husband had received both honors but added that she did not know that they were radical right-wing organizations.
Extremist honors and publications
However, it is documented that Breker wrote a number of articles for right-wing magazines and publications throughout the 1980's and received visits from members of far-right groups, some of whom stayed as guests at his home. Charlotte Breker confirmed such visits in the Stern article but said that she knew nothing of these visitors' neo-Nazi allegiances.
In some far-right publications, Breker has also been credited as being an early sponsor of the extremist National Democratic Party (NPD), something his widow said would be "incomprehensible."
When Breker died in 1991, the anti-Semitic publication Die Bauernschaft, published by Thies Christophersen, a former SS-special officer at Auschwitz-Birkenau, wrote a glowing obituary for its "esteemed reader."
0 notes
aronarchy · 8 months
Text
“Better a Living Judeo-Nazi Than a Dead Saint” Author(s): Amos Oz Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Spring, 1983), pp. 202-209 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Institute for Palestine Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2536162
FROM THE ISRAELI PRESS
[The contents of this section are selected from news reports, articles and editorials appearing in the Israeli press during the quarter. The items chosen illustrate trends on current issues or focus on a specific topic of relevance to the Arab-Israeli conflict.]
“Better a Living Judeo-Nazi than a Dead Saint.” An extreme Israeli nationalist explains his view of the world to Amos Oz. A subsequent commentary by Boaz Evron attacks the views expressed.
The well-known writer Amos Oz recently conducted interviews with adherents of a variety of different ideologies and political beliefs in Israel and the occupied territories. Most dramatic of these was an unnamed Israeli nationalist in a moshav, here called “C,” who expressed overt contempt for any attempt to introduce concepts of universal humanism into Zionism. Oz presented the thoughts of C mainly in the form of a monologue in the newspaper Davar on December 17, 1982. Excerpts from the interview appear below:
“As far as I’m concerned, you can call me any name you want. You can call me a monster. Call me a murderer. But please note that I don’t hate Arabs. On the contrary, personally I feel much better with them, and especially with the Bedouins, than with the Jews. The Arabs—those we haven’t yet spoiled—are proud people, irrational, cruel and generous. The zhids[1] are all twisted. In order to attempt to straighten them up you must first bend them strongly in the opposite direction. And that, in short, is my whole ideology.
“As far as I am concerned, you can give the State of Israel any name you wish. You can call it a Judeo-Nazi state, as did Leibowitz. Why not? As the saying goes—better a living Judeo-Nazi than a dead saint. I don’t care if I am a Qadhafi. I am not after admiration from the Gentiles. I don’t need their love. I don’t need love from Jews like you, either. I have to live. And I intend that my children shall live as well—with or without the blessing of the Pope and the other religious leaders from the New York Times. I shall destroy anyone who raises a hand against my children—I shall destroy him and his children, with or without the famous purity of arms, and I don’t care if he is Christian, Muslim, Jewish or pagan. History shows us that he who won’t kill is killed by others. This is an iron law.
“Even if you give me mathematical proof that the present war still going on in Lebanon is a dirty immoral war, I don’t care. Moreover, even if you give me mathematical proof that we haven’t achieved and won’t achieve any goal in Lebanon, neither a friendly regime nor the breaking of the Syrians, and not even the destruction of the PLO, even then I don’t care: it was worth it. And even if, in a year’s time, the Galilee is shelled again by Katyushas, I don’t really care; we shall initiate another similar war and kill and destroy more and more, until they have had enough. And do you know why all this is worth it? Because it seems that this war has made us hated by the world that calls itself the civilized world. That is it. No more nonsense about the unique Jewish morality, the moral lessons of the Holocaust, the Jews who were supposed to have emerged out of the gas chambers pure and good. No more of that. The destruction of Ain el-Hilweh (it’s a pity we didn’t wipe that wasps’ nest off the face of the earth), the healthy bombardments of Beirut and the tiny massacre—can you call 500 Arabs a massacre? It’s a pity that the Phalangists did it, we should have done it with our own delicate hands—all those good deeds killed once and for all this talk about being a unique people and a Light for the Gentiles. That was all bullshit! That’s it: no more uniqueness, no light and good riddance.
“You should know that I personally have no reason to want to be any better than Khomeini or Brezhnev or Qadhafi or Assad or Mrs. Thatcher or Harry Truman, who killed half a million Japanese using two good bombs. I do want to be smarter than them. Quicker than them, more efficient, but I have no desire to be better than them, or more beautiful than them. You tell me; do the evil men of the world have a bad time? If anyone tries to touch them, the evil men cut their hands and legs off. They chase and catch whatever they feel like eating, and have no indigestion and receive no punishment from Heaven. So from now on, I want to see Israel joining this club. Maybe at last the world will begin to fear me instead of admiring my nobility. Thank God. Let them tremble. Let them call us a mad state. Let them understand that we are a wild country, dangerous to our surroundings, not normal, that we can go crazy because one of our children has been murdered—only one! And go wild and burn all the oil fields in the Middle East! By the way, if it happened to be your child, God forbid, you would talk like I do. Let them consider in Washington, Moscow, Damascus and China that if one of our ambassadors is shot—or even a consul or the attache for stamp collections—we may start World War III just like that. And don’t be surprised if such an image even gives us some support: in the present atmosphere among the youth and intellectuals in the West, among those hypocrites, those saccharine females, if we behave like this it will mean that we are desperate and angry. And if we are desperate and angry it means that we have been victims of injustice. And if we have been victims, they must rush to demonstrate for us, and to identity with us. That’s how the distorted psychology of those beautiful souls operates. Read Franz Fanon! And in any case, with or without support demonstrations for the dangerous and desperate Israel, the main thing is that they will move very cautiously around us so as not to anger the wounded animal. It is high time!”
We are sitting on the balcony of the nice country house of C in one of the well-developed moshavim, looking to the west at the sunset burning in the colors of fire, purple and grey. The fruit trees cover us with a lively, sensual scent. We have been served iced coffee in high narrow glasses. C is about 50 years old and is a well-known man of action. He is a strong and heavy man, dressed in shorts without a shirt, his body tanned to a metallic bronze color, the tan of the blond man who lives under the sun. He lays his hairy legs on the table and his hands on the chair. There is a scar on his neck. His eyes wander over his plantations. He dictates his ideology clearly, in a voice burnt by cigarettes:
“And there is something else, more important than the rest. The sweetest fruit of this war in Lebanon is that now they don’t hate only Israel. Thanks to us, they now also hate all these Feinschmecker-Jews in Paris, London, New York, Frankfurt and Montreal, in all their holes. At last they hate all these nice zhids, those who say that they are something different, they are not the Israeli hooligans, but different Jews, clean and decent. Just like the assimilating Jew in Vienna and Berlin begged the anti-Semite not to mix him up with the stinking Ostjude, who had been smuggled into the cultural environment straight from the dirty ghetto in Ukraine or Poland. It won’t help them, those clean zhids, just as it didn’t do them any good in Vienna and Berlin. Let them shout that they condemn Israel, that they are okay, that they didn’t want and don’t want to hurt a fly, that they always prefer being slaughtered to fighting, that they have taken it upon themselves to teach the Gentiles how to be good Christians and always offer the second cheek. It won’t do them any good. Now they are getting it there because of us, and I am telling you—it’s a pleasure to watch. They are the zhids who persuaded the Gentiles to give in to the bastards in Vietnam, to give in to Khomeini, to Brezhnev; to pity Sheikh Zaki Yamani because of his poor childhood, and on the whole to make love not war. Or do neither: to write a thesis on love and war. From now on, we have finished with all that, now that the zhid is rejected—he not only crucified Jesus, but he also crucified Arafat in Sabra and Shatila. They are identified with us. And that is excellent! Their cemeteries are disgraced, their synagogues are burnt, all the old nicknames are brought back, they are expelled from all the decent clubs, people shoot into their ethnic restaurants, murdering some of the small children, forcing them to remove any sign that will identify them as Jews, forcing them to move, to change their profession. Soon their mansions will be smeared with the slogan: Zhid, go to Palestine! And you know what? They shall go to Palestine because they shall have no other choice!
“And all this is a bonus we got from the Lebanon war. Now you tell me, wasn’t it worth it? Soon we shall see the good times. The Jews will come. The Israelis won’t emigrate and those who emigrated shall return. Those who choose assimilation will understand that it won’t help them to try to be the conscience of the world. The conscience of the world will have to understand through its arse what it did not want to get through its head. The Gentiles have always felt sick of the zhids and their conscience. And the Jews will have only one option: to come home fast, all of them, to install thick iron doors, to build a serious fence, to have sub-machine guns stationed at all corners of the fence and to fight like devils with anyone who dares even to make a sound in the area. And if anyone raises even a hand against us, we should take away half his land, by force, and burn the other half. Including the oil. Including the use of nuclear arms. Until he no longer feels like fighting with us. And do you know what we shall have at the end of this process? Hold on, you are about to have a surprise. I will tell you what we shall gain in the end: three very good and upright things, things you yourself want to achieve but don’t know how to:
All the Jews shall live here.
There will be full and complete Return to Zion.
There will be a real and steady peace.
Yes. And then we shall have peace. And then we shall have whatever we desire.
“And after we finish this chapter, the chapter of violence, then you will be able to play your part. Give us culture and humanist values. People’s solidarity. A Light to the Gentiles. Create such a humanistic state that the whole world shall applaud us. Be the champions of morality. That is how things happen—first of all Joshua and Jephthah the Gileadite clear the ground, wipe out the memory of the Amalek, and then the time may come for the Prophet Isaiah with the wolf and the lamb and all that beautiful zoo, but on condition that by the end of things we shall be the wolf and all the Gentiles around shall be the lamb. Just to be on the safe side.…
“I only know one thing for sure: as long as you are fighting for your existence, everything is permitted. All that is forbidden is then permitted. Even to drive away all the Arabs from the West Bank. Everything.
“Yes. Judeo-Nazis. Leibowitz is right. And why not? Listen to me: a people that gave itself to be slaughtered and destroyed, a people that let soap be made of its children and lamp shades from the skin of its women is a worse criminal than its murderers. Worse than the Nazis. To live in a world of wolves without a fist, without teeth and without nails is a worse crime than to murder. The fact is that the grandchildren of Himmler, Heidrich and Eichmann live very well and are getting fat. They are even using this occasion to moralize to us. The grandchildren of the great Rabbis of East Europe and of all the humane and pacifist Jews who philosophized so well in Prague and Berlin will not moralize to anyone. They are no longer here. And they shall never be here.
“Go read the poems written by Uri Zvi Grinberg, instead of reading all this olive oil written by Gordon and Martin Buber. Read the poem called ‘My God, the Gentiles’ father.’ Maybe you should learn it by heart. Maybe some day it will save your children. If our so very nice parents, instead of writing books about the love of the human race and singing ‘Hear Oh Israel’ on the way to the gas chambers, had come here in time—and don’t fall off your chair—had killed six million Arabs, or one million, what would have happened? Sure, two or three unpleasant pages would have been written in the history books; we would have been called by all sorts of names, but we could have been a people of 25 million here today! That is respectable, isn’t it? The writers would have written nice novels, like Gunter Grass and Heinrich Boll, about our guilt feelings, our shame and regret, and would have won several Nobel prizes for literature and morality. Maybe the government would have paid some compensation from its oil revenues beyond the Euphrates to those Arabs we didn’t manage to kill. But the Jews would have been living in their land! Twenty-five million! From the Suez Canal to the oil fields. And believe me, in spite of our crimes we would have received plenty of offers and proposals from all the bastards, from Moscow and Peking and Washington. In spite of our blood-stained hands.
“Listen: even today I am willing to volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as required, to deport them, to expel, to burn them, to make us hated by all, to make the ground unstable underneath the feet of the Jews in the Diaspora so that they will be forced to rush here crying. Even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there. I don’t care. And I don’t care if five minutes after the whole job is completed and this project is finished, you put me in front of a Nuremberg tribunal. Then put me in prison for life. Hang me if you want, as a war criminal. And then you can wash your Jewish conscience and enter the respectable club of humane, civilized nations who are large, big and healthy. I am willing to take the dirty work upon myself, and you can call me by all the worst names you know. What all of you fail to understand is that the dirty work of Zionism is not yet finished. Far from it. True, it could have been finished in 1948, but you interfered. You stopped it. And all this because of the Jewishness in your souls. Because of the Diaspora mentality. Because of your Khirbet Khiza[2] complex. It is a pity. We could by now have been a normal nation with soft values, with humane neighborly relations with Iraq and Egypt and with a slight criminal record—like everyone else. Like the British, and the French, the Germans and the Americans, who have already forgotten what they did to the Indians, and the Australians, who almost totally eliminated the natives, and everyone else. So what is wrong with being a civilized respectable nation with a slight criminal record? This is acceptable in the best of families. And I already told you: I am willing to take the criminal record upon myself. Together with Sharon, Begin and Raful [Eitan]. And I agree that you will then follow and be the boneless pure pink future. You will write redemption books about my crimes. And you will be forgiven! You will be accepted in the best houses! The public will admire your morality! But only after the cannon or my dirty napalm remove from the Indians any desire to scalp my and your children, and after millions of zhids are here. And only after this country is large and wide enough.…”
At one point… I stopped C’s monologue for a moment and expressed a passing thought, maybe more for myself than for my host: is it possible that Hitler did not only strike the Jews but also infected them with his poison? Did that poison reach some of the hearts and is it still active? C did not protest and did not raise his voice—he did not raise his voice once during all his monologue and he is said never to have shouted under stress during the famous actions his name is tied to. He replied calmly:
“Listen, my dear, if the famous Jewish mind would spend less time saving the world, fixing humanity—Marx and Freud and Kafka and all those geniuses, Einstein as well—if instead they had hurried ten years earlier and established a tiny Jewish state, a kind of independent bridgehead from Hadera to Gedera, and if they had invented a tiny atom bomb for this tiny state in time, there would have been no Hitler. No Holocaust. And no one in the whole world would have dared touch the Jews. By now there would be 20 million of us here from the Suez to the oil fields. Maybe there would have been no need to use the atom bomb on the Germans and the Arabs. It would have been enough to have the bomb in a Jewish store in a tiny state in 1936 or 1939. And no Hitler would have dared touch a fingernail of one Jew. And all those who died would still be alive, they and their children. Was it really beyond the potential of the Jews in the world in the 1930’s to establish a tiny state with a tiny bomb? Maybe we would even have spared the Gentiles World War II. Maybe we would have spared ourselves five or six wars with the Arabs. Listen to what Deuteronomy says: ‘And you shall be left few in number, whereas you were as the stars of heaven for multitude, because you would not obey the voice of the Lord thy God.’”[3]
[1] “Jew” in Polish.
[2] Khirbet Khiza is the title of a classic by Yizhar Smilanski, written around 1950. It describes and condemns the capture of a Palestinian village by the Israeli army, with some of the attendant atrocities.
[3] Deuteronomy 28, 62.
A hostile reaction to the comments of C was expressed by anti-Zionist commentator Boaz Evron in Davar on February 4, 1983. Excerpts from his article are reprinted below:
I owe the reader an apology for taking so long to respond to the views of the man identified as C in the interview he gave to Amos Oz in Davar on December 17, 1982. But such views must be countered. In that interview we were served with the ideological and “philosophical” framework shared by a large part of the Israeli society, including people who are placed in central operational positions. I do not think I will be mistaken in saying that this group includes people such as Sharon and General Eitan, and maybe several other officers and senior officials, who base their ideology on the teachings of Tehiya Party. Hence, this is the occasion to confront the ideology seemingly so well presented by C, and to demonstrate that its logic and understanding of reality and of the world are wrong; that it is based on unfounded… interpretations of history and of world policies, and that it shows a total misconception of the nature of the Jewish people all over the world and of the origins of Zionism.
Before countering C’s arguments, I would like to cite some examples of the totally misguided arguments which he employs. For example, he says that, had we established a very small Jewish state in the 1930’s, and had we developed a small atomic bomb with the aid of Jewish geniuses, then Hitler wouldn’t have dared to hurt one Jew, and we would now have a state with 20-25 million Jews controlling the whole of the Middle East.
Let us follow the argument. Would the leadership of such a very small state have been able to forecast the destruction of European Jewry? At that time people expected hardship, expulsions, some murders and pogroms, but no one envisaged such an extreme outcome. Except for Hitler himself, and maybe some of his closest advisors, even the Nazis did not then think in such terms. And such a small state would not even have thought that it could develop military tools to threaten a superpower like Nazi Germany, with which the whole world had to fight for six terrible years. If that small state had developed serious military forces, they would have been destined (like the Haganah) only for defense against the Arabs. That state would also have had to confront the problems of taking in all the European Jewish refugees, and would not have been able to allocate great sums for nuclear re- search, which in the 1930's was not yet known to be relevant to military aims.
C thinks that the persecution of Jews is the result of anti-Semitic feelings, and that if we could manage to cause anti-Semitism, and the fear of it, we should get many Jews to come to Israel. Thus he comes very close to many who are different from him in many other ways. I can still remember an article written by A. Meged last year which positively cites, as the hope of an optimist, the wish for there to be anti-Semitism, so that Jews will come to Israel. He cannot understand that there is no necessary connection between anti-Semitic feelings and the political expression of them. It is not enough for Israel to behave in a repulsive manner in order to evoke the political expression of those anti-Semitic feelings that are quite endemic to the Christian world. That would require two or three further elements.
The first requirement is that all Jews should be identified with Israel, and that is not at all obvious or necessarily so.…
Hostility against the Jews is not enough by itself to cause anti-Semitic movements. Such hostility must be organized within political bodies holding militant anti-Semitic platforms. It is hard to believe that such movements would be created only because faraway Israel is doing nasty things. They are created only when the social, economic and political conditions in a certain society ask for the creation of parties of a fascist and anti- Semitic character. And they can affect the decision of the Jews to stay or emigrate only if they control the government.…
C does not understand the ideological and social structure of anti-Semitic movements. They are always movements of the extreme Right—i.e., those parts of the population that will not be shocked by Israeli atrocities, or may even like them, just as C himself likes the Nazis, though they murdered millions of his own people. Those parts of the population that will be shocked by Israeli actions, and are shocked today, are the same that also oppose anti-Semitism: the Left, the liberals, the intellectuals.
Furthermore, the lesson that C learns from European and Jewish history in our decade is that it is good to be strong and bad to be weak, that the world is a jungle and that you must be one of the strong animals in it, and to hell with morality. This great discovery is known to every baby, and it is fine and well when you yourself are one of the large animals. But when you begin thinking two steps ahead, things begin to get more complicated. Isn't Israel one of the weaker animals? It is strong compared to the Palestinians (no great achievement), the Syrians and the Egyptians, all of them poor, weak, backward countries fighting to overcome the heritage of European and Ottoman colonialism. But Israel is small and weak compared to almost any European state.… Our power and our bread depend on the economic, political and military support of a superpower.… All the strength and the moral Zionist power of C grow out of the moral support and consideration he receives as a Holocaust victim. If he managed to get rid of this image and live solely on his sword, he might soon discover that he has no sword.…
I did not want to deal with the moral aspect of C’s monologue since C himself does not want to mention morality but speaks only in the name of “tough pragmatism.” When you try to analyze this pragmatism, as I did above, it turns out to be a primitive nightmare of an ignorant man waving pieces of selective information. His position turns out to be unbased even from the point of view of moral power principles. But I shall end with one final remark on this subject. The remark also has “realistic” implications. The state, or the nation, is not a supreme value as C imagines. The Jews, and not they alone, have proved that they can live according to their independent set of values without a political framework. If the political framework forces you to give up your basic values, those values should come first. Thomas Mann and Bertold Brecht preferred to leave Germany rather than to live under the kind of regime C seems to prefer to any other. A society that loses its human image has no right to exist, in the long run, as we have seen in the case of Nazi Germany, and it cannot continue. The same regime that C wants to establish here means the end of the State of Israel.
1 note · View note
munaeem · 11 months
Text
Neo-Nazis block the German-Czech border. Why did they stage the protest?
Neo-Nazis Stage Protest Blocking German-Czech Border In a disturbing turn of events, the German-Czech border became the scene of a recent protest organized by Neo-Nazis. This reprehensible action has garnered significant attention and raises questions about the intentions and motivations behind such an alarming display. While it is essential to approach this topic with caution, attempting to…
View On WordPress
0 notes
flesh-is-the-fever · 1 year
Text
okay, ready?
same guy:
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
karingottschalk · 2 years
Text
The Guardian: Labor to impose streaming content quotas and boost funding for writers and musicians – Commentary
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2022/dec/30/labor-to-impose-streaming-content-quotas-and-boost-funding-for-writers-and-musicians “Streaming services will get Australian content quotas, artists will receive more “fair remuneration” for their work and musicians and writers will have access to more public funding, the arts minister, Tony Burke, has announced. Burke revealed details of a new…
View On WordPress
0 notes
kultureklash · 2 years
Text
Death of An Idea: The Delusion of White Supremacy
Ideas die hard, if at all. That is because ideas are often fueled by beliefs for which the sole basis of belief is the belief itself. People often believe then go about constructing a rationale for such belief. As one scholar noted in defining theology as “faith seeking understanding.” The person of faith believes and the task of the theologian is to provide a justification for that belief or to…
View On WordPress
0 notes
stiridinromania · 2 years
Text
Romania a votat la ONU impotriva rezolutiei privind COMBATEREA NAZISMULUI
Tumblr media
Anul acesta, pe 4 noiembrie, Romania a votat la ONU impotriva rezolutiei privind "Combaterea glorificarii Nazismului, neo-Nazismului si a altor practici care contribuie la alimentarea formelor contemporare de rasism, discriminare rasiala, xenofobie si intoleranta asociata"
Tumblr media
Sursa foto: https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1667720971034020.jpg Pe fondul unei dezbateri aprinse, Comisia a aprobat proiectul de rezoluție prin vot: 105 pentru, 52 împotrivă, 15 abțineri. Prin intermediul proiectului de rezoluție, adunarea generala isi exprima profunda îngrijorare cu privire la glorificarea mișcării naziste, a neo-nazismului și a foștilor membri ai organizației Waffen SS, inclusiv prin ridicarea de monumente și organizarea de demonstrații publice în glorificarea trecutului nazist. (sursa: https://press.un.org/en/2022/gashc4365.doc.htm) Prezentând textul, delegatul Federației Ruse și-a exprimat îngrijorarea cu privire la creșterea retoricii rasiste și xenofobe, a apelurilor de deportare a migranților și a refugiaților, islamofobie, afrofobie și antisemitism. Cu toate ca proiectul de rezolutie se voteaza anual, delegatul Statelor Unite ale Americii a numit rezoluția „o încercare cinică” a Moscovei de a-și promova obiectivele geopolitice invocând Holocaustul și al Doilea Război Mondial. În aceeași ordine de idei, delegatul Australiei a numit inacceptabilă armonizarea Holocaustului și nazismului de către Moscova. Desi rezolutia in sine este una tematica, si nu face referire la anumite tari, reprezentantii Uniunii Europene in cadrul ONU au sustinut ca au votat impotriva, datorita actiunii Rusiei din Ucraina, in care se foloseste termenul "denazificare". "Astăzi, sub falsul pretext de a lupta împotriva nazismului, Rusia a adus înapoi în Europa ororile războiului (...) Condamnăm cu fermitate folosirea argumentului de lupta împotriva nazismului și respingem utilizarea inexactă și inadecvată a termenului „denazificare” de către Rusia pentru a-și justifica războiul inuman, crud și ilegal de agresiune împotriva Ucrainei, ale cărui impacturi continue sunt grave, nu numai pentru poporul Ucrainei, ci pentru oamenii din întreaga lume. O astfel de denaturare erodează înțelegerea noastră asupra Holocaustului, nerespectează moștenirea acestuia și subminează principiile democratice." (Sursa: eeas.europa.eu) Cele 52 de tari care au votat pro-nazism anul acesta, sunt: Ucraina, SUA, UK, Suedia, Spania, Slovenia, Slovacia, San Marino, Romania, Republica Moldova, Portugalia, Polonia, Papua Noua Guinee, Norvegia, Macedonia de Nord, Noua Zeelanda, Olanda, Muntenegru, Monaco, Micronesia, Insulele Marshall, Malta, Mali, Luxembourg, Lituania, Liechtenstein, Liberia, Letonia, Kiribati, Japonia, Italia, Irlanda, Islanda, Ungaria, Grecia, Germania, Georgia, Franta, Finlanda, Estonia, Danemarca, Cehia, Cipru, Croatia, Canada, Bulgaria, Bosnia-Hertegovina, Belgia, Austria, Australia, Andora si Albania. Read the full article
0 notes
thelastunison · 2 years
Text
Alright, so I’m watching Jessie Gender’s video on MW’s (shortening his name down to initials so it doesn’t show up in search results) transphobic “documentary” and have reached this part of the video,- The one where she shows an exempt from the book he released alongside his film:
Tumblr media
And just....I don’t even know what to say. The fact someone who spews such vicious rhetoric so openly has a large following,- implying there’s a lot of people that support and align themselves with his worldview-, is genuinely terrifying. Just look at those last two sentences by themselves; This guy’s a fascist through and through and it fucking shows.
1 note · View note
reportwire · 2 years
Text
Sweden: Right-wing party get 4 chairmanships in parliament
Sweden: Right-wing party get 4 chairmanships in parliament
STOCKHOLM — A right-wing populist party that received the second-most votes in Sweden’s general election last month landed the chairmanships of four parliamentary committees Saturday and with it, the ability to wield more influence in mainstream Swedish politics. The positions to be held by lawmakers from the Sweden Democrats include chairing the Riksdag’s justice, foreign affair, business…
View On WordPress
0 notes
elladastinkardiamou · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
This week's newsletter from AthensLive is out:    
*         Artists struggle continues 
*         Is the law banning a far-right party a bad omen for democracy?
*        Judicial ‘coup’ in favor of vulture funds - Check
- are the main headlines to be found inside this highly informative weekly must-read from and about Greece. The National Theatre Drama School teachers resigned en masse to protest the Presidential Decree undermining Drama School studies. Protests, theatre squats, and more resignations followed, yet the government remains intransigent. A new amendment was voted in, allegedly for blocking a far-right party led by the convicted ex-Golden Dawn member Kasidiaris, raising fears that due to the vagueness of its provisions can lead to the banning of any party not to the liking of a specific establishment. The overturning of landmark Top Court decision protecting debtors from vulture funds was overturned by a new Top Court ruling which provides that these funds can proceed with auctions of debtors' assets. This did not come as a shock as the government had directly intervened through the Bank of Greece to overturn this decision.
It cannot be recommended strongly enough to read and share this week's updates on the events and developments in Greece here:
https://steadyhq.com/en/athenslivegr/posts/d32b6c88-25f4-4000-b240-4360eaa48a42
For anyone with a wish or need to follow and to gain an insight into recent events in Greece and to read and support independent and investigative journalism in English, the weekly newsletter from AthensLive should be a core element in the reading flow.
If you want the best overview of the events and developments in Greece right now, this is the place to go. Not the mainstream Greek news, but independent journalism with sharp analysis and links to interesting and important topics from a variety of sources.
Become a member and get the newsletter in your inbox every week here:
http://bit.ly/2GkVuYt
3 notes · View notes