#NewTestament

[whencyclopedia]

According to Christian tradition, the Twelve Apostles (ΟΙΔΩΔΕΚΑΑΠΟΣΤΟΛΟΙ in Greek, meaning "messengers" or "ones who are sent") were the closest followers of Jesus Christ, chosen to spread his teachings and establish the early Christian Church. They 12 Apostles are traditionally named as: Peter Andrew James (the Greater) John Philip Bartholomew Matthew Thomas James (the Lesser...

[carmelitesaet]

Two of the disciples of Jesus were on their way to a village called Emmaus, seven miles from Jerusalem, and they were talking together about all that had happened. Now as they talked this over, Jesus himself came up and walked by their side; but something prevented them from recognising him. He said to them, ‘What matters are you discussing as you walk along?’ They stopped short, their faces downcast.

Then one of them, called Cleopas, answered him, ‘You must be the only person staying in Jerusalem who does not know the things that have been happening there these last few days.’ ‘What things?’ he asked. ‘All about Jesus of Nazareth’ they answered ‘who proved he was a great prophet by the things he said and did in the sight of God and of the whole people; and how our chief priests and our leaders handed him over to be sentenced to death, and had him crucified. Our own hope had been that he would be the one to set Israel free. And this is not all: two whole days have gone by since it all happened; and some women from our group have astounded us: they went to the tomb in the early morning, and when they did not find the body, they came back to tell us they had seen a vision of angels who declared he was alive. Some of our friends went to the tomb and found everything exactly as the women had reported, but of him they saw nothing.’

Then he said to them, ‘You foolish men! So slow to believe the full message of the prophets! Was it not ordained that the Christ should suffer and so enter into his glory?’ Then, starting with Moses and going through all the prophets, he explained to them the passages throughout the scriptures that were about himself.

When they drew near to the village to which they were going, he made as if to go on; but they pressed him to stay with them. ‘It is nearly evening’ they said ‘and the day is almost over.’ So he went in to stay with them. Now while he was with them at table, he took the bread and said the blessing; then he broke it and handed it to them. And their eyes were opened and they recognised him; but he had vanished from their sight. Then they said to each other, ‘Did not our hearts burn within us as he talked to us on the road and explained the scriptures to us?’

They set out that instant and returned to Jerusalem. There they found the Eleven assembled together with their companions, who said to them, ‘Yes, it is true. The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon.’ Then they told their story of what had happened on the road and how they had recognised him at the breaking of bread.

[Luke 24:13-35]

[theformulaforsuccess]

Why do the four Gospels tell the same story... differently? This Biblical truth will blow your mind. The Gospel writers—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—never edited each other. They didn’t “fix” the differences. And that’s exactly what makes their testimony more trustworthy, not less.

In this video, we dive into the overlooked beauty of the Gospel accounts: the differing details, unique perspectives, and why these variances are proof, not problems. This soul-stirring message will transform the way you read the Bible and deepen your faith like never before.

The differences in the Gospels aren’t contradictions—they are the fingerprints of truth. And once you see it, you’ll never unsee it.

🔥 Watch now and rediscover the power of honest testimony, spiritual harmony, and divine design.

🙏 Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more life-changing Biblical insight!!!

#GospelTruth #BibleStudy #FaithOverFear #Christianity #JesusChrist #Apologetics #BibleExplained #TruthOfTheBible #ChristianTikTok #GospelPerspective

[unfoldingmoments]

Covenants

In Christianity, the concept of covenants is central to understanding God’s relationship with humanity. A covenant is essentially a binding agreement or promise between God and His people, often with specific terms, blessings, and consequences. The number of covenants recognized can vary depending on theological perspectives, but most Christian traditions identify several key covenants, with the Old Covenant and New Covenant being the most prominent in terms of their relevance to today’s Christians. Below, I’ll outline the major covenants, differentiate the Old and New Covenants, and address their relevance. How Many Covenants in Christianity?

Christian theology typically identifies five to seven major covenants in the Bible, depending on how they’re categorized. These are drawn from both the Old Testament (Hebrew Scriptures) and the New Testament. Here’s a common list:

Noahic Covenant (Genesis 9)

Parties: God and Noah (representing all humanity and creation).

Promise: God promises never again to destroy the earth with a flood, symbolized by the rainbow.

Sign: The rainbow.

Nature: Universal, unconditional, and ongoing for all humanity.

Abrahamic Covenant (Genesis 12, 15, 17)

Parties: God and Abraham (and his descendants).

Promise: God will make Abraham a great nation, bless all nations through him, and give his descendants the land of Canaan.

Sign: Circumcision.

Nature: Unconditional in its ultimate fulfillment (God’s promise), though obedience is expected.

Mosaic Covenant (Exodus 19–24)

Parties: God and the nation of Israel through Moses.

Promise: God will make Israel His treasured possession if they obey His laws (the Ten Commandments and the Law).

Sign: The Sabbath.

Nature: Conditional—blessings for obedience, curses for disobedience.

Priestly Covenant (Numbers 25:10–13)

Parties: God and Phinehas (extended to Aaron’s priestly line).

Promise: An everlasting priesthood for Aaron’s descendants.

Sign: None explicitly stated, but tied to priestly service.

Nature: Specific to the Levitical priesthood (some see this as a subset of the Mosaic Covenant).

Davidic Covenant (2 Samuel 7)

Parties: God and David.

Promise: An everlasting kingdom through David’s line, fulfilled in the Messiah (Jesus).

Sign: None explicit, but the throne symbolizes it.

Nature: Unconditional—God ensures a king from David’s line forever.

New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31–34; fulfilled in Jesus, Luke 22:20, Hebrews 8–9)

Parties: God and all who believe in Jesus (extending beyond Israel to all nations).

Promise: Forgiveness of sins, a new heart with God’s law written on it, and direct relationship with God through Jesus’ sacrifice.

Sign: The Lord’s Supper (Communion).

Nature: Unconditional in its initiation (by God’s grace), with faith as the response.

Some theologians group minor covenants (like the Priestly) under larger ones, reducing the count to five or six. Dispensationalists might emphasize seven distinct covenants as part of their framework, aligning with their view of salvation history.

Old Covenant: Established at Mount Sinai, it’s often called the Law or the Mosaic Covenant. It was a system of rules and sacrifices meant to guide Israel and show humanity’s need for a savior, as no one could perfectly keep it (Galatians 3:24).

New Covenant: Prophesied in Jeremiah and inaugurated by Jesus at the Last Supper (“This cup is the new covenant in my blood” – Luke 22:20), it fulfills and surpasses the Old Covenant. Jesus’ death and resurrection provide forgiveness and a direct relationship with God, replacing the need for ongoing sacrifices (Hebrews 10:10).

Which is Relevant to Today’s Christians?

For today’s Christians, the New Covenant is the most relevant. Here’s why:

Fulfillment of the Old: Christians believe Jesus fulfilled the Old Covenant’s requirements (Matthew 5:17). The Law pointed to Him, and His sacrifice completed its purpose (Romans 10:4). The Old Covenant’s ceremonial and civil laws (e.g., animal sacrifices, dietary rules) are no longer binding, though its moral principles (e.g., Ten Commandments) remain instructive.

Universal Access: The New Covenant extends God’s promises beyond Israel to all nations (Galatians 3:28–29). It’s based on faith, not ethnicity or adherence to the Mosaic Law.

Practical Application: Christians live under the New Covenant through practices like Communion, prayer, and following Jesus’ teachings (John 13:34–35). The Holy Spirit, given under this covenant, empowers believers (Acts 2).

Theological Consensus: Most Christian denominations (Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox) affirm the New Covenant as the current framework. The Old Covenant is respected as foundational but seen as superseded (Hebrews 8:13: “By calling this covenant ‘new,’ he has made the first one obsolete”).

Exception: Some Messianic Jews or Hebrew Roots movements may still observe aspects of the Old Covenant (e.g., Sabbath, kosher laws) alongside the New, but this is a minority view and debated (Acts 15, Galatians 3).

Unexpected Detail

An intriguing point is that the New Covenant was foreshadowed in the Old Testament (Jeremiah 31:31–34), showing continuity rather than a complete break. The idea of God writing His law on hearts connects back to Deuteronomy 30:6, where God promises to circumcise hearts—suggesting the New Covenant fulfills rather than replaces the intent of the Old.

Conclusion

Christianity recognizes multiple covenants, but the Old (Mosaic) and New (Jesus) Covenants are the focal points. The Old Covenant set the stage, revealing God’s holiness and human sinfulness, while the New Covenant, established through Christ, is the one relevant to Christians today. It offers forgiveness, transformation, and a direct relationship with God, making it the cornerstone of modern Christian faith and practice.

[youthguysteve]

Reading the Bible in a year

Photo by John-Mark Smith on Pexels.com For those of you who might be interested in reading your Bible in a year. In 2024 I led a Bible Study group reading through the Bible in a year. I pray this will be a blessing to you as you try to read through the Bible. We followed the Historical Plan of reading through Bible in a year on the Bible App. You can find that on the YouVersion App. Power…

[cmexpertise]

Bible Book 6 Album - Digital Bible App - Bible Tablet

[dillons-tips]

The Vespasian Conspiracy: Unraveling the Narrative of Paul, Titus, and the New Testament

Introduction The New Testament is often viewed as a sacred text, inspired by divine revelation. However, an alternative perspective suggests a more politically motivated origin, positing that the Vespasian family, particularly Vespasian and his son Titus, played a crucial role in shaping its narrative. This theory posits that these Roman figures not only influenced the creation of biblical texts but also funded the key players within early Christianity to fulfill their prophecies and solidify their power. Central to this narrative are Paul the Apostle, who emerges as a prominent figure in the early church, and Titus, whose military conquests echo the themes of divine judgment and renewal present in the biblical texts. Additionally, the figure of Josephus, a well-educated Jewish historian who found himself in the employ of the Vespasian family, serves to highlight the intricate connections between power, faith, and historical narrative. The Vespasian Family and Roman Political Strategy Vespasian, who became Emperor in 69 AD, ascended to power during a tumultuous period known as the Year of the Four Emperors. He solidified his authority through military might and political cunning. His son, Titus, gained fame for his role in the Jewish War, particularly for his leadership during the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 AD. This catastrophic event led to the destruction of the Second Temple, a pivotal moment in Jewish history. The Vespasian family had vested interests in the outcome of the Jewish War. By influencing early Christianity, they could pacify Jewish dissent and promote a version of faith that aligned with Roman values. The idea that the Vespasian family wrote the Bible and manipulated key players serves as a compelling narrative that underscores the intertwining of religion and politics. Paul: The Apostle as a Roman Operative Paul the Apostle emerges as a critical figure in the New Testament, often referred to as the "Apostle to the Gentiles." His letters, which comprise a significant portion of the New Testament, emphasize grace, faith, and the inclusion of non-Jews into the faith. However, if we consider the theory that he was a pawn in a grander scheme orchestrated by the Vespasian family, his role becomes more complex. Paul was a Roman citizen with an elite education, allowing him to navigate both Jewish and Greco-Roman cultures effectively. His dual identity enabled him to promote a version of Christianity that was palatable to both Jewish and Roman audiences. The question arises: Was Paul genuinely a devoted servant of Christ, or was he an operative serving the interests of a powerful family seeking to control the burgeoning Christian movement? The Letters as Political Documents When examining Paul’s epistles, it is essential to consider their historical context. His letters often address issues faced by early Christian communities, emphasizing unity and inclusion. However, they also reflect a strategic approach to establishing authority and legitimacy. For instance, Paul’s declaration in Galatians 3:28—"There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus"—serves to unify diverse communities under the banner of Christianity. This rhetoric can be viewed as a means of mitigating tensions within a society grappling with ethnic and class divisions. Moreover, the theological concepts introduced by Paul, such as grace and redemption, could have been designed to distance the new faith from traditional Jewish beliefs, making it more acceptable to Gentiles. If we consider this in light of the Vespasian conspiracy, Paul’s role as a cultural interpreter takes on a new meaning—one where he acts as a facilitator of Roman authority rather than a mere servant of Christ. Titus: The Roman General and His Biblical Mention Titus, son of Vespasian, is a pivotal figure in both history and the biblical narrative. He played a key role in the Roman siege of Jerusalem, ultimately overseeing the destruction of the Second Temple. In the biblical narrative, he is mentioned as a significant leader who aids the early Christian church, yet his portrayal serves to reinforce the narrative that aligns with Roman interests. The mention of Titus in the New Testament, particularly in the Book of Titus, positions him as a legitimate figure within the early church. His character embodies the Roman ideals of strength and leadership while simultaneously providing a connection to the emerging Christian faith. This convenient mention suggests that the Vespasian family sought to legitimize their power by intertwining their lineage with the nascent Christian movement. The Context of Biblical Writings The timing of the writings in the New Testament is significant. The Gospels and Paul’s epistles were composed during a period when the Roman Empire was consolidating its power over the regions once held by the Jewish nation. By framing the narrative in a way that emphasizes grace, redemption, and the eventual triumph of Christianity, the Vespasian family could position themselves as benefactors of a faith that was beginning to spread throughout the empire. Furthermore, the destruction of the Second Temple and the subsequent loss of Jewish sovereignty created a vacuum that early Christianity sought to fill. In this context, the Vespasian family’s involvement in shaping the narrative becomes even more critical, as it aligns their interests with the emerging Christian faith. Josephus: The Scholar and Roman Collaborator Flavius Josephus, a Jewish historian, adds another layer to this intricate narrative. Initially a commander in the Jewish forces during the revolt against Rome, Josephus was cornered by Roman troops and found himself in a dire situation. In a moment of desperation, he surrendered to the Romans, ultimately becoming a collaborator with the Vespasian family. His transformation from a Jewish leader to a historian chronicling Roman victories is emblematic of the broader themes of power and subjugation present during this period. Josephus’ works, particularly "The Antiquities of the Jews" and "The Jewish War," offer invaluable insights into Jewish history and the context surrounding the emergence of Christianity. However, his role as a historian in service of the Roman Empire raises questions about the authenticity and reliability of his accounts. By writing from a Roman perspective, Josephus may have inadvertently shaped the narrative that contributed to the legitimization of Roman rule over the Jewish people. His writings provide a historical backdrop that complements the biblical texts, suggesting that the early Christian narrative may have been carefully crafted to align with the political interests of the Vespasian family. By presenting the destruction of the Second Temple as a form of divine judgment, both Josephus and the emerging Christian narrative could effectively justify the Roman conquest and the establishment of Christian authority. The Theological Implications: A New Order Paul’s writings often emphasize themes of submission and authority, with passages like Romans 13:1-2 urging believers to "be subject to the governing authorities." This directive raises questions about the intentions behind Paul’s teachings. If Paul was operating under the influence of the Vespasian family, his emphasis on submission to Roman authority could be seen as a strategic move to quell dissent and promote a harmonious relationship between Christians and the empire. Moreover, Paul’s portrayal of himself as a "fool for Christ" (1 Corinthians 4:10) suggests a paradoxical embrace of weakness in the face of power. This duality aligns with the Vespasian family’s need to present Christianity as a counter-cultural movement that ultimately serves the interests of the empire. By portraying himself as a humble servant, Paul could effectively appeal to the marginalized while simultaneously serving the interests of the powerful. Conclusion: The Interplay of Power and Faith The narrative that suggests the Vespasian family wrote the Bible and influenced key figures like Paul, Titus, and Josephus raises important questions about the intersection of faith and politics. While the New Testament is often viewed as a divinely inspired text, considering its potential political motivations reveals the complexities of early Christianity’s development. In this view, Paul emerges not merely as a servant of Christ but as a strategic player in a broader scheme orchestrated by the Vespasian family. His writings reflect the tension between faith and power, illustrating how early Christians navigated a world shaped by Roman authority. Similarly, Titus’ convenient mention in biblical texts serves to solidify the connection between the emerging Christian faith and the Roman Empire, while Josephus’ role as a historian reinforces this narrative. Ultimately, the story of Paul, Titus, Josephus, and the Vespasian family invites us to reflect on the ways in which power dynamics influence religious narratives, shaping the beliefs and practices of communities throughout history. By uncovering these connections, we gain a deeper understanding of the socio-political context that gave rise to the early Christian movement and the lasting impact of these figures on the course of history. Read the full article

[christian-perspectives]

Why The New Covenant Is Better

But this is the new covenant I will make with the people of Israel on that day, says the Lord: I will put my laws in their minds, and I will write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. Hebrews 8:10 The Beginning of the New Covenant When Jesus sat with His disciples at the Last Supper, He offered them bread, symbolizing His broken body. Later in the meal, Jesus continued by offering the cup. In the same way, he took the cup of wine after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant between God and his people—an agreement confirmed with my blood. Do this in remembrance of me as often as you drink it." 1 Corinthians 11:25 So, what makes the New Covenant better than the old one? Many might say, because the Bible says it's so, which we can all agree with. But let's dig a little deeper than that. I found what the writer of the Book of Hebrews said about the first covenant interesting. If the first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no need for a second covenant to replace it. Hebrews 8:7 Critics of God and His Word would immediately say, "Your God" made a mistake. But that assumption comes from those who don't know Him or the truth of His Word. Verse eight reveals to us where the fault laid when it came to the Old Covenant. It says, "But when God found fault with the people." The people couldn't come up to God's standards. The Old Covenant started with the commandments that God wrote on stone tablets. Because of man's sinful nature, humans couldn't completely obey these and God's other laws. Our sinful nature began when Adam and Eve ate from the tree of good and evil. Since then, the majority of people have followed their own set of rules rather than those of God.

Jeremiah Foretold of the New Covenant

The author of Hebrews quoted the prophet Jeremiah when he said the following. The day is coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and Judah. This covenant will not be like the one I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand and led them out of the land of Egypt. Hebrews 8:8-9 A New Covenant? The leadership among the Israelites had the people right where they wanted them. They enjoyed keeping their people at bay, obeying God's laws and theirs. The New Covenant differed from the old one because it dealt with a person's heart. The Old Covenant kept people in obedience by the external things they did. Look again at today's verse. But this is the new covenant I will make with the people of Israel on that day, says the Lord: I will put my laws in their minds, and I will write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. Hebrews 8:10 Jeremiah probably had no idea what the laws in their minds and God writing them on their hearts meant. Jesus, however, explained to us what it meant in two sentences. Jesus replied, You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. A second is equally important: Love your neighbor as yourself. Matthew 22:37-39 How do we know those two sentences cover all of the Old Testament law? Because Jesus completed His preceding thought in the following statement. The entire law and all the demands of the prophets are based on these two commandments. Matthew 22:40

The Bible Serves as Our Roadmap

The Bible guides us like a road map in helping us to fulfill those two commandments. It tells us how to live a life of love. 2 Timothy 3 gives us a detailed definition of the purpose of the Bible. All Scripture is inspired by God and is useful to. . . teach us what is true and  to make us realize what is wrong in our lives. It corrects us when we are wrong and  teaches us to do what is right. God uses it to prepare and equip his people to do every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 The Lord explained through Jeremiah why God replaced the Old Covenant with a new one. We can read about it in more of the quote written by the writer of Hebrews. This covenant will not be like the one I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand and led them out of the land of Egypt. They did not remain faithful to my covenant, so I turned my back on them, says the Lord. Hebrews 8:9 The Old Testament saints didn't have access to the scriptures. Thus, the priests taught them everything they needed to know to maintain a relationship with God. With the New Covenant, we don't need to learn how to have a relationship with Jesus. He comes into our hearts. God gave us the scriptures to guide us in maintaining that relationship with Him. And they will not need to teach their neighbors, nor will they need to teach their relatives, saying, 'You should know the Lord.' For everyone, from the least to the greatest, will know me already. Hebrews 8:11

Aren't You Happy About the New Covenant?

Aren't you glad we not only have a New Covenant but, it is written on our hearts? The writer of Hebrews made this final thought about the Old Covenant. When God speaks of a "new" covenant, it means he has made the first one obsolete. It is now out of date and will soon disappear. Hebrews 8:13 The word obsolete doesn't mean useless. I typed this article using an obsolete word processor on an old computer. Most computer people would have no use for my equipment. On the other hand, the Old Covenant is only obsolete until we decide to stray from the new one. God's grace will guide us back to walking on His narrow path.   Lord, thank you for writing your law in our minds and on our hearts. And thank you for the roadmap of the Bible that helps us stay on the right path. You may also want to read these posts as well, - The Old Testament Covenant Is Obsolete. - The Order Of Melchizedek Related posts on when we are cleansed by the blood of Jesus - If We Confess Our Sins - Jesus Is The Ultimate Sacrifice For All Eternity - Cleansed By The Blood Of Jesus Read the full article

[whencyclopedia]

Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles is the story of how the movement that became Christianity began in Jerusalem and spread throughout the Eastern Mediterranean cities of the Roman Empire. It was written by the same author as the third gospel, assigned to Luke, sometime between c. 95 and 120 CE. The combined work, known as Luke-Acts to scholars, is the longest text in the New Testament.

Purpose

The Jewish prophets had predicted that the God of Israel would intervene in human history one final time and institute his kingdom on earth. God would raise up a messiah figure to lead the people and restore the nation of Israel according to God's original plan in the Garden of Eden. The kingdom would include some Gentiles (the nations, pagans) who repented and worshipped God.

According to the gospels, Jesus Christ declared that the kingdom was imminent. But decades had passed, and there were no indications of the kingdom. The purpose of Acts was to demonstrate that everything the prophets had predicted was, in fact, being manifest in the contemporary actions of the first Christian missionaries, the disciples and Paul. As a sequel, the events in Acts also 'fulfilled' the predictions of Jesus in Luke's gospel.

The sources for Acts are the Jewish scriptures, the books of the prophets, and travelogues of the journeys of Paul the Apostle. Luke included specific details found in the letters of Paul the Apostle to the Gentiles, but there are also contradictions. When in doubt, we take Paul's letters as the more credible source. Paul's letters contain no internal dates. Scholars use Acts to establish a chronology of Paul's travels and letters.

Acts (praxeis apostolon in Greek) is characterized as ancient historiography, the method of writing a history of a people and events. Historiographers were expected to create speeches for famous characters that matched their known characteristics. Acts contains 24 major speeches, with the consensus that Luke was the author.

Continue reading...

[carmelitesaet]

Jesus showed himself again to the disciples. It was by the Sea of Tiberias, and it happened like this: Simon Peter, Thomas called the Twin, Nathanael from Cana in Galilee, the sons of Zebedee and two more of his disciples were together. Simon Peter said, ‘I’m going fishing.’ They replied, ‘We’ll come with you.’ They went out and got into the boat but caught nothing that night.

It was light by now and there stood Jesus on the shore, though the disciples did not realise that it was Jesus. Jesus called out, ‘Have you caught anything, friends?’ And when they answered, ‘No’, he said, ‘Throw the net out to starboard and you’ll find something.’ So they dropped the net, and there were so many fish that they could not haul it in. The disciple Jesus loved said to Peter, ‘It is the Lord.’ At these words ‘It is the Lord’, Simon Peter, who had practically nothing on, wrapped his cloak round him and jumped into the water. The other disciples came on in the boat, towing the net and the fish; they were only about a hundred yards from land.

As soon as they came ashore they saw that there was some bread there, and a charcoal fire with fish cooking on it. Jesus said, ‘Bring some of the fish you have just caught.’ Simon Peter went aboard and dragged the net to the shore, full of big fish, one hundred and fifty-three of them; and in spite of there being so many the net was not broken. Jesus said to them, ‘Come and have breakfast.’ None of the disciples was bold enough to ask, ‘Who are you?’; they knew quite well it was the Lord. Jesus then stepped forward, took the bread and gave it to them, and the same with the fish. This was the third time that Jesus showed himself to the disciples after rising from the dead.

[John 21:1-14]

[theformulaforsuccess]

Join Douglas Vandergraph as he delves into an insightful review of 1 Timothy Chapter 2 from the New Testament. In this comprehensive analysis, Douglas explores the chapter's key themes, including the role of men and women in the church, the significance of prayer, and the pursuit of godliness. Whether you're a seasoned Bible scholar or new to biblical studies, this discussion offers valuable perspectives to deepen your understanding of this pivotal scripture.

For more in-depth discussions, visit my YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@DouglasVandergraph and don’t forget to subscribe!

Support our ministry by buying Douglas a cup of coffee:

https://buymeacoffee.com/douglasvandergraph

#1Timothy2 #BibleStudy #NewTestament #DouglasVandergraph #ScriptureReview #ChristianTeachings #ChurchLeadership #BiblicalInterpretation #PrayerInTheBible #Godliness