#Realistic AI Portrait Generator

[artifymaster]

Realistic AI Portrait Generator: Revolutionizing Digital Art with Hyper-Realistic Creations

In the digital age, artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping various creative fields, and the world of portraiture is no exception. The emergence of the Realistic AI Portrait Generator marks a pivotal moment in how we create and perceive digital art. This cutting-edge technology uses advanced machine learning models to generate hyper-realistic portraits that mimic the look and feel of human-drawn or photographic images.

What is a Realistic AI Portrait Generator?

A Realistic AI Portrait Generator is a specialized software tool that uses AI algorithms, typically based on deep learning and neural networks, to create lifelike images of human faces. These tools analyze large datasets of human portraits, learning the subtle details of facial structures, skin textures, lighting, and expressions to produce images that are often indistinguishable from real photographs.

By processing input data or references, these AI systems can generate unique and customizable portraits with remarkable accuracy. Users can control various attributes such as age, gender, ethnicity, hair color, and even specific facial expressions or emotions.

How Does it Work?

The foundation of these generators is typically a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). A GAN consists of two main components: a generator and a discriminator. The generator creates portraits, while the discriminator evaluates their authenticity. Over time, the generator improves by learning to trick the discriminator into believing the generated portraits are real.

This continuous feedback loop allows the AI to enhance its ability to create highly realistic images. In some advanced models, additional controls enable users to manipulate fine details like the lighting, background, and artistic style, further enhancing the creative possibilities.

Applications of Realistic AI Portrait Generators

Digital Art and Design: AI portrait generators offer new creative avenues for digital artists, allowing them to experiment with different styles and techniques without the constraints of manual illustration.

Gaming and Animation: In the gaming industry, AI-generated portraits provide developers with quick and customizable character designs. These characters can be used in both 2D and 3D game environments, adding realism to avatars and NPCs (non-playable characters).

Marketing and Advertising: Brands can use AI-generated portraits for personalized marketing campaigns, creating custom images that resonate with diverse audiences without the need for costly photoshoots.

Identity and Security: AI-generated portraits have potential uses in the security industry, where facial recognition technology is evolving. These generators can help improve biometric systems and assist in training facial recognition software by providing large sets of realistic facial data.

Social Media and Entertainment: Some tools let users create realistic versions of themselves or others, adding to the popularity of virtual influencers and avatars. This could redefine how people present themselves online or even create new forms of entertainment.

Ethical Considerations and Challenges

As powerful as AI portrait generators are, they raise important ethical concerns. The ability to generate highly realistic human faces opens the door to potential misuse, such as creating fake identities or deepfake images. It also raises questions about consent and intellectual property, as some systems may use real people's faces as part of their training data without explicit permission.

Additionally, while AI can replicate human artistry, it might also reduce demand for certain manual skills. This creates tension between technological advancement and the value of human craftsmanship.

The Future of AI Portrait Generators

As the technology evolves, we can expect Realistic AI Portrait Generators to become even more refined, accessible, and integrated into everyday life. The potential to create hyper-realistic visuals will continue to grow, pushing the boundaries of creativity and automation. This evolution will undoubtedly revolutionize industries ranging from art and design to security and entertainment, changing the way we interact with digital imagery.

In conclusion, AI-driven portrait generation represents an exciting fusion of technology and art, offering limitless possibilities for creators and consumers alike. While it presents certain challenges, its potential to innovate and enhance our digital lives is undeniable. Whether you are an artist looking for new inspiration or a business seeking personalized solutions, the Realistic AI Portrait Generator is set to become a powerful tool in the modern digital toolkit.

[lorenzodalessandro]

Made a starter pack as well!! \(◕ ◡ ◕\)

http://instagram.com/lorenzodalessandro

[xponentialdesign]

Beautiful women of Africa 1. Congo 2. Sudan 3. Nigeria

[hfj-art]

[thechekhov]

I'm gonna delete that reblog because I don't want to start any witch-hunt type activities, nor do I want to harass others online.

However, I'm not gonna lie - I am still of the belief that the artist in question is implementing AI images in their art, and IF they are, I think it would be better to be forthright about it.

I'd love to be wrong, but there are things that seem fishy to me.

To reply to realistic concerns from @crustaceousfaggot

I have also glanced through their blog and here is my takeaway:

I have no doubts that this individual DOES actually draw, but their style has evolved from mainly paintings of faces and portraits into machinery and landscapes in a very short amount of time.

I don't believe that this individual ONLY uses AI. It's possible they don't use text based AI software. My best guess is that they're popping an image into AI and asking it to complete/modify it.

There are images where it seems to me that the face or the hands of something has been painted over in a style that doesn't quite match the rest of the image.

Again - I don't personally care about how another artist gets their kicks but I want people to be honest about labeling it.

Even if it's augmented with actual art. People deserve to know, in general, if something is drawn or computer generated, just like they deserve to know if an image has been altered and photo-shopped!

And I'd love to be wrong, but there are way too many AI-tells in the art in general for me to not be suspicious.

[vivalgi]

Hi, I know you said you didn't people arguing with you, and that is not at all what I'm trying to do, but I do think this is important to point out. Feel free to ignore this ask. As an artist and someone who also hates AI and has had their own art detected as AI by AI art detectors, I do not believe that Bardric's current design was fully AI-generated (please do keep in mind that with AI nowadays it can be hard to tell for a fact unless confirmed by the artist or has the stereotypical AI art style). I know you make a lot of edits, but I'm not sure if you're an artist yourself. If you are, there is a chance you have more experience than me, in which case I would trust your word more (I've only been doing art for around 3 years). From what I can gather, most of the evidence you've pointed out are easy-to-make mistakes, with one not even being a mistake. Based on my understanding, this design is still technically concept art (I think they stated that in a story, correct me if I'm wrong) so mistakes are completely understandable. The lapel that looks like it's divided into three parts seems to be like a not-fully rendered part. If you were to use a smudge tool in that area, you would get something similar to the other lapel. Many digital artists try to not use a copy paste or symmetry tool in their art for one reason or another, to the point that if you look at other art with somewhat similar styles (like wlop's older art or Samdoesart's portraits with a lot of metal and jewelry) and you zoom in, you will see very similar things occuring. Personally, I've never seen AI generators do the "double vision effect" with such harsh edges, often being overly blended out. Based on the lighting (which seems to be coming from the upper-left) I'd assume it's a bounce light from the gold because if you look at the entire rim, you'll see it is meant to be above the lapel, not sewn onto it. Now, I will admit, I have 0 clue about what is going on with the pants. It both does and does not make sense (to me) and just gives me uncanny valley vibes. And I can make no comment on the belt as I have seen way too many kinds of belts out there in fantasy worlds (literally just google 'belt buckle fantasy' and you will see belts that make no sense, like, you can see the prong in some but not others and in so many of them it looks like the prong is melted into the buckle) when doing studies and getting some of my won so I have given up. Also, there are no egregious issues with the shadows. The light is coming from the front, not the back. Were it coming from the back, there would be rim lighting and the front of his face would not be shiny. If you find pictures with similar lighting, you will notice the collar makes a shadow on both the neck and the part beneath the collar (if it is on the side the light comes from). The lighting in this image makes total sense with any issues simply being minor mistakes even advanced artists do Once more, I am not expert, and I could totally be wrong. I am not a professional artist, especially not in the semi-realistic art style. However, I have notices a lot of artists who have been on the internet for ages and have proved many times that it is their own art are just now being called out for AI since their own art style is similar. Finally, keep in mind that a lot of artist follow the rule of "don't add too much detail if the image is understandable", again I point to wlop and samdoes art, but there's also rishidraws, Alberto Mieglo (make sure you're looking at his concept art, particularly spiderverse art, as some of his posts are fully finished products where he was required to add a lot of detail due to the size of the piece) and rossdraws. If you look at their art for long enough, you will notice a lot of similar artistic/stylistic decisions (aside from the part where the pants and shirt meet, again, I have no clue wtf is going on there) that you pointed out

Constructive conversation is always welcome. What happened on the other site was more like making fun and laughing off by crazed fangirls when I only dared to mention my suspicion and nothing more, so don't worry about annoying me with your post 😅

I can see why those artists you've mentioned could be accused of using AI due to their art style and it's a shame this is happening. I still trust myself more than any AI detector, even when all of them happen to agree with me. There's lots of things that could trigger those tools, even totally innocent ones, or just some barely noticeable filter.

I also wouldn't dare to say Bardick's art is fully AI, but I'm still pretty confident the process involved AI assistance. How exactly, I'm not completely sure. The evolution images are too low quality (and suspiciously late stage drawings as someone pointed out) to fully understand the process. I haven't really had a chance to try AI-assisted art creation myself (not sure my PC can handle it and the tools online have been pure scam and gambling so far), but it seems similar to what I've seen on videos: the artist starts with a sketch (or AI generated image), feeds it wholly to AI (again) or masks certain areas to regenerate, sketches over again, fixes some things, another round of AI, rinse and repeat, until finally adding finishing touches.

The right lapel's triangularly placed sticks certainly aren't just lazy brush strokes in a non-focus area. They're too detailed for that, having proper shading, highlights and maybe even shadows, yet don't make any sense compared to the other side.

That corner even seems to change slightly between the last two evolution images (although too low quality once again):

(the skin tight shirt is also something AI likes to do, although no abs sticking out this time 😛)

Maybe you're right and the double lines around the hem really are intended to be a reflection or something but even then it would be such an unnecessary detail to add.

I can see it could have been badly worded but I didn't claim that the light comes from the back, that's why I pointed out why the coat's collar leaving a shadow on the shirt was strange, as if the light was cast from behind, unlike the rest of the image. Before daring to write about the shadows, I must admit I even put on my white shirt and played around with phone's flashlight in front of the mirror 😅, so I'm pretty sure there's too much shadow on the shirt below the collar. Some shadow and shading due to light getting trapped under the collar would have been normal, like this quick 1-min smudging:

...but otherwise it's impossible to get two such clear and large shadows on both sides with a single light source.

Why I've been wary of Candlelight when it comes to the use of AI, is because Andrew was the creative force behind Storyloom (creative director according to Linkedin) and there was at least one book series made by PB - Season of Love - that heavily used AI generated assets (some Youtube playthroughs still exist). Like you, I also remember there being a comment or post from CL about the stage of Bardick's design but I'm already doubting myself if it was claimed to be final or not and I can't find the post anymore. I'd like to believe we've only seen the concept. From what I understood then the character arts are outsourced, so there's some chance they're not even aware about the use of AI.

Link to my post we're talking about

[daemonya]

Useful AI Websites

Remember when we thought robots would take over the world? Well, they kinda did, but instead of laser eyes and metal claws, they're armed with… tools? Yep, these days, AI is less "Terminator" and more "personal assistant on steroids" 🤖

Bot Making Assistant:

Ever wanted a personal minion but can't afford the banana budget?

Fantasy Name Generators

Rabid's Generators and RPG Resources

Random Original Character Generator

Perchance ― AI Character Description Generator

Perchance ― AI Chat & Roleplay and AI Chat w/image

Perchance ― AI Story Generator

Perchance ― AI Text Adventure and AI Adventure w/image

Perchance ― AI Hierarchical World Generator

AI Writing Assistant:

Don't blame me when your AI-assisted love letters start sounding suspiciously like robot poetry.

Cohesive

Dreamily

Fiction Fusion

Grammarly

Hemingway Editor

NovelAI

Perplexity

Phind

Quicktools

RambleFix: AI Note-taking & Writing Tool

RedQuill

TinyWow

ToolBaz

Tune Chat

WriterHand

You

AI Voice Generator:

Want to sound like Morgan Freeman without the years of smoking?

Murf AI

Dupdub AI

Vocal Removal

Adobe: Enhance Speech

Kits.AI (vocal removal, voice cloning)

AI Music Generator:

Who knows, you might accidentally create the next viral TikTok earworm and retire to a private island.

AI VOCALOID

Suno

Udio

AI Image Generator:

Whatever you need, these tools are your ticket to visual madness.

Bing Image Creator (SFW only) 👉🏻 how to prompt

Microsoft Designer (SFW only)

Maze Guru

Tensor.Art

CivitAI

PixAI

Runware

Text to Image

NeuralBlender

Leonardo.AI (and videos too)

Perchance AI Image Generator

Perchance AI Photo Generator (realistic)

AI Video Generator:

Video killed the radio star, and now AI is coming for Hollywood.

Hedra (make your characters sing)

VIGGLE (make your characters dance)

Dreamina (text/image to video)

Luma (text/image to video)

Vidu (text/image to video)

Genmo (text/image to video)

Haiper (text/image to video)

KLING (text/image to video)

Pika (text/image to video)

PixVerse (text/image to video)

invideo (text to video)

Fliki (text to video)

AKOOL (deepfake, face swap, talking photo)

D-ID (make live, speaking portraits)

Runway (prompt to video)

Creatify (create AI video ads)

Adobe: Animate from Audio

AI Image and Video Editor:

These magical tools are here to save your digital bacon!

123apps (edit, convert, create video, audio, PDF)

3D Book Cover Creator (book cover mockups)

Color Picker (from image)

Capcut AI Tools (upscale video)

Upscale.media (upscale image)

removal AI (image background remover)

Photopea (advanced image editor)

[ratrodstudios2]

Blue Suede Soul .................................

This AI-generated image is a hyper-realistic digital portrait inspired by the legendary Elvis Presley. It captures the iconic rock and roll figure in a brooding, contemplative pose with striking detail—sharp cheekbones, piercing blue eyes, and his signature hairstyle. The soft, painted texture and subtle background blend seamlessly to create a timeless, almost ethereal atmosphere, reminiscent of classic 1950s glamour photography. The image is artistically signed in the bottom right, adding a fine art touch.

[fantomaskw]

via Massimo @Rainmaker1973 - These hyper-realistic AI-generated human-animal hybrid portraits [🎞️ Phil Langer / hybridportraits]

[renardtrickster]

One addition to the ai discussion (Asking so we don’t go into extra long post time): a friend of mine compares ai art in its current state to early views on photography. Photography and illustrations eventually learned to commingle but initially there was outcry/push around the idea of cameras replacing landscape and portrait artists but photography is no replacement for traditional art and trying to make it such just doesn’t work. Currently we’re in the “this is going to replace all artists forever” phase with ai art. A sort of “how you use the tool matters more than the tool itself” situation.

I think I can agree with that. It's less the AI itself and more so the "Cult of AI". Putting aside the quality of image generation output, the real conversation tends to turn to "executives will use this as a replacement and enshittify their media and fire their creative team" or "I think you're depriving yourself of the personal development that forging an artistic skill brings".

But at the same time, the cult has a god, and I wonder if it's not too unreasonable to suggest that the cult didn't form for no reason. Photography is of practical benefit because we can now instantly capture a subject in an objective fashion, and it never overtook illustration because photos can only "automate" a particular style of animation, that being "ultra-realistic", and is not capable of doing abstract or stylized depictions. Photos can never be Beatrix Potter or Yoshitaka Amano. But all the same, AI has done Ghibli.

A very theme park version of Ghibli, lacking a lot of their finer touch, but a version of Ghibli nonetheless. And the Cult of AI tries to sell AI as a replacement for art, but is the AI not also doing that? What is the logical endpoint of refining your image generator to be less prone to error, to be more specific, to be capable of adopting specific styles, if not to surpass the need for alternatives?

Further, while the implementation is the harm, there's no way to limit the worst harm of that outside of gentleman's agreements. Please don't fire your creative staff and switch over to AI animation or I'll vote with my dollar, please turn your personal art blog into AI or I'll unfollow you, please don't try to blatantly bootleg this commercial artist or I'll be mad, please don't please don't please don't. Not helping matters that the only solutions are "stuff the cat back inside the bag", which is impossible, or "copyright cuck supreme Disney owns the concept of princesses now", which is. Not Great. Or the joke I've made that the only real solution is, frankly, unlivable amounts of harassment towards AI artists. Which is also Not Great. Probably.

I ended up spitballing and spiraling out a bit, but it is a tricky subject. Doubly so when the two predominant positions are "it's devil technology" and "I am glad that small artists are being rendered jobless because they're petite bourgeois/they're degenerate intellectual eaters and art should be beauty and nothing more".

[kukku2050]

✨ Mesmerizing beauty captured in digital art! ✨ This AI-generated ultra-realistic portrait features a stunning young woman with radiant green eyes, golden wavy hair, and flawless skin. The soft cinematic lighting and deep gaze create an enchanting mood, making this artwork perfect for lovers of digital portraiture. Whether you're into AI art, hyperrealistic portraits, or aesthetic photography, this masterpiece is a must-see! 🌿🎨 #DigitalArt #AIArtLover#AIArt #DigitalPortrait #Hyperrealism #AestheticBeauty #CinematicLighting #RealisticPortrait #FantasyArt #AIgenerated #ArtisticVibes #WomenOfArt #GlowUp #PinterestAesthetic #DreamyVibes #ModernMuse #ArtisticExpression #FeminineGrace #GoldenHourGlow #DigitalPainting #VirtualPhotography #AIInnovation

[wocwithmentalillness]

AI image Generator Craiyon prompt:

realistic blue monochromatic palette knife portrait painting of beautiful black woman

Results

[dakimomoe]

I'm sorry but wtf is that previous ask. I honestly hope that person was just being silly.. please say you were just joking?

because if they were serious that's the dumbest shit ever and making the author feel bad about that is kinda mean.

Just because you are an artist doesn't mean you need to use your own art for YOUR own project. Like 70% of IFs I've seen use AI art and it's OKAY!!! These are fictional characters. Come tf on.

Others I've seen make moodboards on pintrest with face claims and asthetic posts. Especially more modern IFs.

That's the latest thing. But most Ifs especially ones based with magic or fantasy I've seen uses the art you used in your post and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. I love the chatacters and I loved seeing them come to life that way so thank you!! You didn't even need to do that. ♥️

YOU HAVE NOTHING TO APOLOGIZE FOR. so please don't feel like you should be feeling bad about anything. You have your hands full writing and coding. That's amazing and taxing as hell. If fans want realistic or authentic art they can post fan art.. themselves! 😒🙄

I was feeling pretty terrible about it, but I understand how it can make others feel iffy. I only recently took interest in it when I saw WIPs use it for portraits. It’s interesting for personal use, but I will never claim the generated images as mine.

I don’t want any trouble, so I’m just going to take them down and focus on the WIP. I don’t want to get too discouraged before I even get to finish the full demo, there’s still so much I want to share.

Anyway, thank you elephantunknownphantom! I really appreciate this so much. I hope you have a wonderful day always!

[void-ink-studios]

Void Ink Studios Commissions - 2024

COMMISIONS ARE: OPEN!

COMMISSIONS IN THE QUEUE: 0

All prices are in USD

Please email me at voidinkstudiosbusiness@gmail.com for any and all commission orders! Also, please keep communication for any one commission limited to ONE email chain.

WILL DO:

Character/Creature Design Work

OCs

Anthro/Furry (And All Variations)

Any Fandom (Including Crossover art)

Shipping Art

Mild Gore (See my Apoctober series for reference)

Custom Work

WON'T DO:

Comics

NSFW pieces

Fetish Art in general (I don't kink shame, but don't involve me, please.  If your kink is something that might not automatically register as a kink, don't let me know, I'm begging you.  Rule of thumb: If you wouldn't show it to your parents, please reconsider.)

Excessive Gore

Realistic Human Portraits

Exact Style Copies

Meches/Machinery (Case by case basis)

Racist content/Content that could be interpreted as racist

Any otherwise Hateful material

NFTs/AI Art

If you're thinking about commissioning something that might not be on the list, please feel free to reach out to me via email or Tumblr, and I'll clarify!

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS BEFORE INITATING AN ORDER:

COMMISSION SHEET AND TOS

COMMISSION ORDER GUIDELINES

--------------------------------------------------

Commission Slots are open to the public for now. Please do not violate my trust in having them public. If I get scammed, I will move commission slots to available only to Ko-Fi members!!!!

Check out my Ko-Fi HERE!

Check out my Redbubble HERE!