#Reciprocal System Of Vectors

[mariacallous]

The German high command learned a key lesson after losing World War I: Never fight a two-front war. That’s why Germany signed the 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop pact with the Soviet Union, which stated that neither country would attack the other for a decade. But Adolf Hitler couldn’t count to 10, and Germany ended up in World War II—another two-front war that ended badly for Germany.

The same dictum goes for trade wars. It’s okay to fight a one-front war, but not a war with the whole world. As comedian Norm Macdonald joked on The Late Show in 2015, “In the early part of the previous century, Germany decided to go to war, and who did they go to war with? The world … Then about 30 years pass and Germany decides, again, to go to war. And, again, it chooses as its enemy the world!”

Now, U.S. President Donald Trump has decided to start a trade war, and who does he choose to attack? The world. On his so-called “Liberation Day” in April, Trump imposed tariffs on most countries, even islands with penguins and allies that run trade deficits with the United States.

The result is that the rest of the world appears to resent the United States now and is beginning to plan for a post-American trading system. Japan, South Korea, China, and members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are in talks to cooperate on trade, as are the European Union and China. Canada is also looking to the EU for closer trade and investment ties in light of Trump’s tariffs.

Regardless, Trump seems to think that the United States is still the top dog, the head honcho, the boss. But it’s time to face the facts: The United States will lose massively from his trade war.

The reason is simple. Too many U.S. companies, especially in advanced industries, need global market access to survive and thrive. The model Trump company is a low to moderate tech and nontraded American company selling almost all its output domestically. Think kitchen knife makers, furniture producers, and golf club companies. (Does Trump know that he and his fellow country club members will soon pay more for a new set of irons?) If Trump protects these companies from overseas competition, his thinking goes, these companies will thrive. How could they not with a large protected market?

Not so fast. The United States cannot be powerful without robust advanced industries. And those industries will seriously struggle in Trump’s new world.

There are multiple vectors of challenge. The first is that U.S. firms that produce for export—think Boeing, Merck, General Electric, and others—will see their input costs increase significantly as they pay tariffs on imported components and materials.

Second, as other nations enact reciprocal tariffs, these companies’ products will be priced out of foreign markets. Companies in other countries will buy South Korean memory chips rather than those manufactured by Micron. Airbus jets, not Boeing. Hitachi machinery, not Caterpillar. You get the idea.

On top of that, Trump is opening the floodgates for blatant discrimination against U.S. firms. The EU is using Trump’s aggression to justify its “EuroStack”: a plan to eventually replace almost all U.S. tech products, from computer chips to severs, with those made in Europe. And while the bloc has finally announced plans to boost military spending, it will do so by purchasing European-made weapons.

This gets to a related challenge. While U.S. exporters under Trump’s trade war will be increasingly shut out of foreign markets, their competitors will find themselves in a globally integrated market, albeit sans the United States. That will be particularly true as other nations take steps to create more integrated markets through new trade agreements. Foreign companies will have the scale needed to innovate and thrive. By contrast, U.S. producers, dependent on the relatively smaller U.S. market, will slowly shrivel and perhaps ultimately die.

Trump’s import substitution strategy (ISI) has been tried elsewhere before. It failed. The international development community widely embraced ISI in the 1950s and ’60s as a growth strategy—and many developing nations held onto it until the 1980s and beyond. One reason it failed was that countries, even relatively large ones like Brazil, did not have big enough markets to efficiently make increasingly complex goods. A recent analysis of global industrial policies by the International Monetary Fund found that it was nations that adopted export strategies, such as South Korea and Taiwan, that thrived—not those that championed ISI.

Even though the U.S. economy is much bigger than, say, South Korea’s, today’s advanced industries require larger markets than the United States can provide to survive—if only to generate the revenues needed to pay for continuous research and development.

But there’s more. As the United States’ role as the global trade hegemon wanes, China will surely take its place. Beijing has spent the last 15 years penetrating every global institution. With Trump leading the U.S. exit from many of them—such as the World Health Organization, the Paris Agreement, and the United Nations Human Rights Council—victory is China’s.

We are already seeing, and will likely continue to see, vastly more countries traveling to Beijing and kowtowing to Chinese President Xi Jinping to cut trade deals. Brazil and Colombia, once the largest recipient of U.S. economic assistance in South America, have already gone down that road. Chinese advanced industries may not have U.S. market access after the trade war, but they will have the rest of the world’s. American companies, meanwhile, will be left with the scraps of the U.S. market.

After Trump’s drawdown of foreign aid, China is also spending much more than the United States to win the hearts and minds of other countries. It doesn’t take a weather person to know which way the wind blows: east. As Xi recently wrote in an article for a Russian newspaper, “unilateralism, hegemony and acts of bullying are inflicting severe harm” around the world. Only Trump could make China look like the defender of free trade and solidarity.

To be clear, Trump needed to go to (trade) war with nations not playing fair. The top offender is China, which started the global trade war around 2006 and has ramped it up since Xi took office. Along with some other countries, Beijing has engaged in systemic mercantilist practices, helping to hollow out U.S. manufacturing and leading to massive U.S. trade deficits.

China conducted massive intellectual property theft. It bludgeoned foreign firms, forcing them to produce in China and transfer technology. Then, it closed its markets once it gained production capabilities in a particular industry.

U.S. attempts to address China’s cheating through the World Trade Organization (WTO) have been few and far between, in part because the WTO is structured in ways that make effectively prosecuting such actions nearly impossible. U.S. firms also largely refused to cooperate with the WTO for fear of Chinese government retribution. The same goes for the EU.

The relatively few cases the United States brought and won provided mostly pyrrhic victories, such as quotas for rare-earth exports and wind power subsidies, neither of which changed competitive realities. And in most cases, China filed counter suits to U.S. suits. Trump was right: It was time to declare war. But not, as Macdonald would say, on the world all at once.

So, is there any hope? Probably not. But if Trump is one thing, it is unpredictable.

Here’s what Trump should have done: first focus on a few of the worst offenders of global trading rules, such as Vietnam, Indonesia, and India. Before imposing tariffs, invite those countries to talk, list key U.S. demands, and give them 90 days to fix them. Only impose tariffs if they refuse to respond. And while doing that, focus on the trade barriers and irritants that are most important to U.S. competitiveness in advanced industries.

If these nations want to expand their shrimp exports, then who cares? If they want to close their markets to U.S. whiskey, that’s not worth fighting about. But attacking U.S. tech firms and limiting access to advanced U.S. goods and services—that’s worth going to the mattresses over.

Then, pivot to Europe. After that, pivot to Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. You get the picture. But don’t go to war with the whole world at the same time. All that does is create a worldwide anti-American alliance.

When China conducts its trade wars, it has enough sense to not attack every country all at once. Beijing launches a trade strike on a particular nation and then waits for a bit, gauging the foreign response; when outrage has died down, it launches another. And like a frog in boiling water, other nations have taken China’s blows with barely a whimper.

China remains the only country with the will and the means to destroy U.S.—and Western—advanced technology industries. Trump’s trade war should be designed to keep Beijing from winning. Above all, that means working with U.S. allies. But in the face of the United States’ increasing hostility and declining power, many nations find it easier to cut deals with Beijing.

Without allies, any war is lost. Unless Trump shows a willingness to negotiate with U.S. allies—something he refused to do when he met with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in May—the United States will be just as globally isolated as it was before World War I. However, the big difference between then and now is that technology requires U.S. firms to attain global scale to survive and that China has emerged to outcompete them.

We can only hope that the United States emerges from its own multifront conflict better than Germany did.

[true-blue-sonic]

For the ask game, what about 31, 33, 55, and 60 for Espilver? :D

31. How would they describe one another.

Silver would be marvelling at how strong Espio is! And he'd be full of praise about Espio's ninja abilities and skills, too <3 I think Silver would also draw a lot of attention to the fact Espio was his first friend of the past, and willing to believe him where everyone else thought him crazy. I think that is an event Silver deeply cherishes <3

For Espio, I think he'd similarly describe Silver's strong will and spirit, the fact he never gives up, and how he's always there and ready to protect the world as precious traits his beloved possesses. I think he'd also mention Silver's focus and the fact he learns quickly and is always interested in trying out new things, too!

33. Which one of them gives "that look" when they other is acting like a fool?

Espio: he's got ample training with That Look because of Vector and Charmy, lol. Unfortunately for him, Silver is completely immune to Looks of any kind, and will readily keep being his pushy, snippy self if he deems it necessary XD That being said: I think if Espio is clear about why Silver should or should not do something, Silver does listen to him. It just needs to be more clear than eye contact and head-shaking, haha! I think that with an explanation that is sound, Silver is far more likely to listen to others.

55. Who spoils who? Does their S/O tolerate it? Do they secretly enjoy it?

I think that would be Espio: I can see him be the kind of person who liking giving his beloved little things or just lots of attention! Espio does seem like someone who knows how to set up a thoughtful gift to me, and he'll do it if he values the person enough. I think Silver would quite like it, since he knows Espio also enjoys finding things that Silver likes. But I can see him want to return all that attention in kind, so he'll set out to find things Espio appreciates in turn!

60. Are they willing to show PDA? If not, is there a reason?

I think Silver would not care about any reaction people might have to their PDA: he doesn't seem to get embarrassed all that easily about his actions, so I think he'd be totally cool with holding hands with Espio or giving him a kiss in public or such things. He loves Espio, after all, and why would he be afraid to show it? No, Silver is 100% down for PDA: I figure he might not even know there's people out there who consider PDA cringe.

Espio, meanwhile, would probably rather die: he does seem easier to fluster than Silver to me XD I think he'd struggle far more with initiating PDA in public, since he's got a reputation to upkeep and he doesn't want to get teased. Silver might understand that with some explaining, but I think Espio doesn't want to stifle him there, so they might settle in a system wherein Silver initiates PDA a bit more discreetly and Espio reciprocates discreetly? <3

[deadly-espresso]

Fun Facts About TROJAN HORSE!

The original concept of TROJAN HORSE actually dated back to February of 2023 (At the time, Illusion of Flattery was my most recently posted song). I previously only had the original melody thought out at the time as well as some basic plot details (The subject of the song's name was Troy and he was like some sort of guy obsessed with a girl who didn't reciprocate his feelings and he had eventually plotted an attack on her after becoming a Trojan Horse). However, I had originally scrapped the song due to audio mixing issues and overall lack of skill (I hadn't even started implementing proper keys into my songs until Wanderlust and Illusion of Flattery). I had briefly revisited the song in October of 2023, but then I forgot about it again until May of this year.

The fake BSoD that I made for the warning screen at the beginning of the song was edited in MS Paint, of all programs. This was because it was the only program I had where the "System" font (the font that used to be used on Windows BSoDs (or at least Windows 9x systems, because the base of the edit was a BSoD from Windows Me)) rendered correctly (I couldn't access the font in FireAlpaca, and the font looked blurry in Krita because Krita renders fonts as vector images with no feature to turn off anti-aliasing) The edit was hard to pull off and I ended up having to make some minor adjustments to the edit in FireAlpaca, but the edit was certainly doable because, well, I made it.

Some more fun stuff about the fake BSoD I made is that does include a reference to a genuine error code (In this case, the error code "04" refers to an "overflow trap"). Also, if you compare the string of numbers in the error message to this Base64 index alphabet table, the numbers actually spell out a word in Base64 code (but then you'll have to decode that yourself 😏)

While I'm aware that TROJAN HORSE's very premise is bound to spark some KinitoPET jokes (even I've made my fair share of jokes about it), I actually envisioned the whole premise of the song long before KinitoPET was released to the public (The KinitioPET game's release was in January of this year, although I didn't learn of its existence until March. Funny enough, I had even envisioned Troy having a pink color scheme and wearing black tights (or maybe that just IS his leg color, since he chooses how he looks? 🤔) before the release of KinitoPET. However, I still think the release of KinitoPET did have some effect on the final version of the lore and song I settled on (for extra funnies, it turned out the creator of KinitoPET is named "troy_en").

Before that whole crisis I had on deciding what voice would play Troy in TROJAN HORSE, the placeholder voicebank I had used for testing the vocal tuning was Solaria's lite voicebank.

[biblenewsprophecy]

Donald Trump announces ‘Golden Dome,’ China objects, but WWIII will still come

COGwriter

Newsweek reported the following:

China Reacts to Trump’s ‘Golden Dome’ Missile Shield

May 21, 2025

China said it is “gravely concerned” by U.S. President Donald Trump‘s proposed “Golden Dome” anti-missile defense system and urged him to abandon the project.

Why It Matters

American military leaders have consistently warned that nations like China and Russia are developing advanced missile technologies that outpace existing U.S. defenses. Golden Dome is intended to close that gap.

What To Know

“This highly offensive system violates the principle of peaceful use of outer space,” said Mao Ning, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, at a press briefing on Wednesday morning.

“It will exacerbate the risk of turning outer space into a battlefield and starting an arms race, and shake the international security and arms control system.”

Trump’s Golden Dome Fulfills Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’

Trump has unveiled his administration’s preferred concept for the Golden Dome program—a sprawling $175-billion initiative that will mark the first time the U.S. deploys weapons in space.

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump said he expects the system to be “fully operational before the end of my term,” which ends in 2029, and claimed it would be capable of intercepting missiles “even if they are launched from space.” https://www.newsweek.com/china-trump-golden-dome-missile-shield-2075066

Now, if it were up to me–and it isn’t–I would prefer that a nuclear war occur in space between satellites and not on the earth itself.

For the sake of argument, though, let’s assume that the ‘Golden Dome’ project actually will basically work.

Will that prevent World War III?

No.

The reality is that the United States is prophesied to be destroyed, so that will happen (cf. Daniel 11:39; Isaiah 10:5-11).

In my book Unintended Consequences and Donald Trump’s Presidency: Is Donald Trump Fulfilling Biblical, Islamic, Greco-Roman Catholic, Buddhist, and other America-Related Prophecies?, I had the following:

By focusing too much on threats from China and almost always considering the Europeans as some type of allies, a Donald Trump Administration is currently not expected to reverse the Asian ‘pivot’ strategy. 

While I understand some of the logic behind the defense strategy, Donald Trump’s ‘Golden Dome’ project is an example of this.

Consider the following:

EU deployment of French nuclear bombers

14 May 2025

The French president floated the idea during a TV appearance on Tuesday, comparing it to the United States’s nuclear umbrella policy that guarantees Washington would reciprocate if its allies come under nuclear attack.

“The Americans have the bombs on planes in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Turkiye,” Macron told TF1 television.

“We are ready to open this discussion. I will define the framework in a very specific way in the weeks and months to come.” https://www.arabnews.com/node/2600671/world

Germany wants nuclear bombers

Germany’s armed forces are currently studying the possibility of acquiring nuclear bombers capable of using the new American B61-12atomic bombs.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon itself plans to deploy these new atomic bombs in the German region of Eifel, in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The German air force already has multi-tasking Tornado warplanes, which are already capable of deploying American atomic bombs. But those aircraft are going to be replaced, possibly, by European-developed Eurofighters, or by United States manufactured F/A-18 Super Hornets. …

Germany does not manufacture atomic weapons but has come to consider itself as a nuclear power because it has vectors to use them, 04/18/19 https://www.voltairenet.org/article206153.html

Nuclear bombers are aircraft loaded with nuclear missiles. Destroying such missiles would NOT be something ‘Golden Dome’ would be able to do.

While now is not the time–“the end it not yet” (Matthew 24:6; see also When Will the Great Tribulation Begin?)–the French, Germans, and others in Europe have access to nuclear weaponry and other technology, which, one day, will lead to the conquering of the United States.

Year ago, we put out a video related to Europe and nuclear bombers:

Nuclear bombers for the Beast?

It is reported that the Germans are looking for a new bomber to be able to be used to deliver US B61-12 atomic bombs. Does Germany already have access to American nuclear weapons it can now use? What about Belgium, Italy, and the Netherlands? Has there been increased interest in more independent European nuclear capacity since the election of US President Donald Trump? What has Berthold Kohler, Herbert W. Armstrong, Nigel Farage, Jean-Claude Juncker, and Maximilian Terhalle said about Europe’s militaristic ambitions? What about Bible prophecy? Could the Great Tribulation begin with a thermonuclear strike? What has Time, NTI, and Global Research reported about European nuclear weapons available to European nations? Is a nuclear attack consistent with prophecies? Might the coming Beast use nuclear weapons against the USA? Dr. Thiel addresses these issues and more.

Here is a link to the sermonette video: Nuclear bombers for the Beast?

Back in 2015, I posted the following:

Eventually, perhaps under the guise of a NATO exercise, Europe will launch a surprise attack against the USA (cf. 1 Thessalonians 5:3; Daniel 11:39).  This would possibly happen after one or more trade disputes, and perhaps after the USA has been weakened by weather problems, terrorist acts (from likely Islamic sources allied with Europe, per Psalm 83:3-8), war, riots, solar flares, severe earthquakes, civil unrest, devastation of their genetically-modified food supplies, food shortages, and/or various pestilences–an intensity of “sorrows” such as Jesus discussed in Matthew 24:4-8 leading up to the time of the Great Tribulation.   Disasters, especially if there is an ElectroMagnetic Pulse (emp) attack or a severe solar flare storm, could be part of a so-called “perfect storm” of events that could set up the USA for destruction.

I suspect that after the Europeans and the USA have some strained relations in the future, the Europeans may call for/agree to a joint military exercise, possibly under the conditions of NATO, in the USA.  This would allow the Europeans to bring military aircraft, troops, and other military items to the USA, without the USA getting concerned it would soon be attacked.

The Bible shows that the end-time European power will take advantage of circumstances, trust, and timing (cf. Daniel 8:23-25; 1 Thessalonians 5:3).  While various people will claim that the Europeans are the friends and allies of America and Britain, notice the following prophecy:

1 How lonely sits the city That was full of people! How like a widow is she, Who was great among the nations! The princess among the provinces Has become a slave!

2 She weeps bitterly in the night, Her tears are on her cheeks; Among all her lovers She has none to comfort her. All her friends have dealt treacherously with her; They have become her enemies. (Lamentations 1:1-2)

The USA and Great Britain (including its Anglo-Commonwealth members, like Australia and Canada) were “great among the nations.” And the Bible is clear that betrayal is coming from national FRIENDS!  Like many of those in NATO. (Thiel B. Montenegro invited to be part of NATO–was Germany involved? COGwriter, December 2, 2015)

Nuclear bombers for Europe, combined with a NATO exercise, and issues in the United States, could destroy the US and its British-descended allies. While there are other possible scenarios to defeat the USA, the fact is that a ‘Golden Dome’ will not stop WWIII from happening.

The Bible shows that Europe will become a militarily successful power (cf. Revelation 13:3-4), with a great army (Daniel 11:25), and many ships (Daniel 11:40).

The Bible, Revelation 13, tells of the Beast power having seven heads and ten horns:

1 Then I stood on the sand of the sea. And I saw a beast rising up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and on his horns ten crowns, and on his heads a blasphemous name. 2 Now the beast which I saw was like a leopard, his feet were like the feet of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. The dragon gave him his power, his throne, and great authority. (Revelation 13:1-2)

The sea that this is referring to is the Mediterranean sea as passages in the Old Testament demonstrate (Daniel 7:2-3; Numbers 34:6-7; Joshua 1:4; 9:1; 23:4; Ezekiel 47:13-16; watch also Can You Prove that the Beast to Come is European?).

The Beast power to come will be European.

The Europeans are arming and uniting more because of Donald Trump as well as Russia’s conflict with Ukraine.

The arming and semi-unity by the Europeans will lead to WWIII!

This will be the end of the USA and its British-descended allies consistent with the following prophecy:

39 Thus he shall act against the strongest fortresses with a foreign god, which he shall acknowledge, and advance its glory; and he shall cause them to rule over many, and divide the land for gain. (Daniel 11:39, NKJV)

The above destruction is from a European power, called the King of the North, which borders the Great Sea (Daniel 7).

As far as the use of nuclear weapons, here was Herbert W. Armstrong’s position:

What is this abomination? This refers to Daniel 11:31 and Matthew 24:15…That will be a time when the UNITED Europe shall appear–the revival of the medieval “Holy Roman Empire.” We shall then be warned, and readied to be taken to a place of refuge and safety from the Great Tribulation. Forty-five days later “the beasts armies” will surround Jerusalem. Thirty days later the Great Tribulation will probably start with a nuclear attack on London and Britain–and possibly the same day or immediately after, on the United States and Canadian cities. The GREAT TRIBULATION, we shall fully then realize, is the time of “Jacob’s Trouble,” spoken of in Jeremiah 30:7. And Jacob’s name was named on Joseph’s sons, Ephraim and Manasseh (Gen. 48:16). At that time a third of the people in our nations will die, or shall have died, by famine and disease epidemics; another third will dies of the war–our cities being destroyed (Ezek. 6:6), and the remaining third will be carried to the land of our enemies as slaves (Ezek. 5:12). (Armstrong HW. The Time We Are In, Now. Pastor General’s Report-Vol 1, No. 15, November 20, 1979, Page 2).

The Bible states:

33 I will scatter you among the nations and draw out a sword after you; your land shall be desolate and your cities waste (Leviticus 26:33).

Nuclear and other high-tech weapons (as well as EMP, electromagnetic pulse bombs), as well as devastating solar flares, are ways to make land desolate and modern cities waste (for more on EMP-weapons and solar flares see Nuclear EMP Attack on UK Called ‘Quite Likely’).

Of course, some believe that despite WWI, WWII, and previous massive wars, that Europe would never start WWIII. Yet, this overlooks a biblical prophecy:

5 O Assyrian, the rod of mine anger, and the staff in their hand is mine indignation. 6 I will send him against an hypocritical nation, and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge, to take the spoil, and to take the prey, and to tread them down like the mire of the streets.

7 Howbeit he meaneth not so, neither doth his heart think so; but it is in his heart to destroy and cut off nations not a few.

8 For he saith, Are not my princes altogether kings? 9 Is not Calno as Carchemish? is not Hamath as Arpad? is not Samaria as Damascus? 10 As my hand hath found the kingdoms of the idols, and whose graven images did excel them of Jerusalem and of Samaria; 11 Shall I not, as I have done unto Samaria and her idols, so do to Jerusalem and her idols? (Isaiah 10:5-11, KJV)

The USA is sometimes prophetically referred to as Samaria (and sometimes as Manasseh) in biblical prophecy (for details, watch USA in Prophecy: Samaria). So, even though Germanic-led Europe (referred to as Assyria above) does not seem to wish to do this (Isaiah 10:7), according to biblical prophecy it will come to pass. The USA will be defeated (cf. Daniel 11:39; see also USA in Prophecy: The Strongest Fortresses).

Events that resemble nuclear or similar devastation are part of the prophesied curses mentioned in the Bible:

23 ‘The whole land is brimstone, salt, and burning (Deuteronomy 29:23).

19 Through the wrath of the LORD of hosts The land is burned up, And the people shall be as fuel for the fire; No man shall spare his brother. 20 And he shall snatch on the right hand And be hungry; He shall devour on the left hand And not be satisfied; Every man shall eat the flesh of his own arm. 21 Manasseh shall devour Ephraim, and Ephraim Manasseh; Together they shall be against Judah (Isaiah 9:19-21).

6 In all your dwelling places the cities shall be laid waste (Ezekiel 6:6).

Yes, devastation from some type of weapons of mass destruction (which do not have to be nuclear) will come–and Europe will lead this.

Jesus said:

36 Watch therefore, and pray always that you may be counted worthy to escape all these things that will come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man. (Luke 21:36)

He also said to pray for God’s Kingdom to come.

Remember to regularly do so.

A ‘Golden Dome’ will not prevent WWIII.

Related Items:

The Gospel of the Kingdom of God This free online pdf booklet has answers many questions people have about the Gospel of the Kingdom of God and explains why it is the solution to the issues the world is facing. Here are links to four related sermons:  The Fantastic Gospel of the Kingdom of God!, The World’s False Gospel, The Gospel of the Kingdom: From the New and Old Testaments, and The Kingdom of God is the Solution.

Europa, the Beast, and Revelation Where did Europe get its name? What might Europe have to do with the Book of Revelation? What about “the Beast”? Is an emerging European power “the daughter of Babylon”? What is ahead for Europe? Here is are links to related videos: European history and the Bible, Europe In Prophecy, The End of European Babylon, and Can You Prove that the Beast to Come is European? Here is a link to a related sermon in the Spanish language: El Fin de la Babilonia Europea.

The European Union and the Seven Kings of Revelation 17 Could the European Union be the sixth king that now is, but is not? Here is a link to the related sermon video: European Union & 7 Kings of Revelation 17:10. Must the Ten Kings of Revelation 17:12 Rule over Ten Currently Existing Nations? Some claim that these passages refer to a gathering of 10 currently existing nations together, while one group teaches that this is referring to 11 nations getting together. Is that what Revelation 17:12-13 refers to? The ramifications of misunderstanding this are enormous. Here is a link to a related sermon in the Spanish language: ¿Deben los Diez Reyes gobernar sobre diez naciones? A related sermon in the English language is titled: Ten Kings of Revelation and the Great Tribulation.

European Technology and the Beast of Revelation Will the coming European Beast power would use and develop technology that will result in the taking over of the USA and its Anglo-Saxon allies? Is this possible? What does the Bible teach? Here is a related YouTube video: Military Technology and the Beast of Revelation.

The Large Hadron Collider has Military Potential Some say this European project is only peaceful. So why is it working on capturing antimatter? Here is a link to a related video: Could the Large Hadron Collider lead to destruction?

USA in Prophecy: The Strongest Fortresses Can you point to scriptures, like Daniel 11:39, that point to the USA in the 21st century? This article does. A related sermon is titled: Do these 7 prophesies point to the end of the USA?

Who is the King of the West? Why is there no Final End-Time King of the West in Bible Prophecy? Is the United States the King of the West? Here is a version in the Spanish language: ¿Quién es el Rey del Occidente? ¿Por qué no hay un Rey del Occidente en la profecía del tiempo del fin? A related sermon is also available: The Bible, the USA, and the King of the West.

Who is the King of the North? Is there one? Do biblical and Roman Catholic prophecies for the Great Monarch point to the same leader? Should he be followed? Who will be the King of the North discussed in Daniel 11? Is a nuclear attack prophesied to happen to the English-speaking peoples of the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand? When do the 1335 days, 1290 days, and 1260 days (the time, times, and half a time) of Daniel 12 begin? When does the Bible show that economic collapse will affect the United States? In the Spanish language check out ¿Quién es el Rey del Norte? Here is a link to a video titled: The Future King of the North.

The Great Monarch: Biblical and Catholic Prophecies Is the ‘Great Monarch’ of Catholic prophecies endorsed or condemned by the Bible? Two sermons of related interest are also available: Great Monarch: Messiah or False Christ? and Great Monarch in 50+ Beast Prophecies.

Germany’s Assyrian Roots Throughout History Are the Germanic peoples descended from Asshur of the Bible? Have there been real Christians in Germanic history? What about the “Holy Roman Empire”? There is also a You-Tube video sermon on this titled Germany’s Biblical Origins.

Germany in Biblical and Catholic Prophecy Does Assyria in the Bible equate to an end time power inhabiting the area of the old Roman Empire? What does prophecy say Germany will do and what does it say will happen to most of the German people? Here is a link to a video Is the USA Pushing Germany to Start WWIII?

Lost Tribes and Prophecies: What will happen to Australia, the British Isles, Canada, Europe, New Zealand and the United States of America? Where did those people come from? Can you totally rely on DNA? Do you really know what will happen to Europe and the English-speaking peoples? What about the peoples of Africa, Asia, South America, and the islands? This free online book provides scriptural, scientific, historical references, and commentary to address those matters. Here are links to related sermons: Lost tribes, the Bible, and DNA; Lost tribes, prophecies, and identifications; 11 Tribes, 144,000, and Multitudes; Israel, Jeremiah, Tea Tephi, and British Royalty; Gentile European Beast; Royal Succession, Samaria, and Prophecies; Asia, Islands, Latin America, Africa, and Armageddon;  When Will the End of the Age Come?;  Rise of the Prophesied King of the North; Christian Persecution from the Beast; WWIII and the Coming New World Order; and Woes, WWIV, and the Good News of the Kingdom of God.

Unintended Consequences and Donald Trump’s Presidency: Is Donald Trump Fulfilling Biblical, Islamic, Greco-Roman Catholic, Buddhist, and other America-Related Prophecies?  Is Donald Trump going to save the USA or are there going to be many disastrous unintended consequences of his statements and policies? What will happen. The link takes you to a book available at Amazon.com.

Unintended Consequences and Donald Trump’s Presidency: Is Donald Trump Fulfilling Biblical, Islamic, Greco-Roman Catholic, Buddhist, and other America-Related Prophecies? Kindle edition is available for only US$3.99. And you do not need an actual Kindle device to read it. Why? Amazon will allow you to download it to almost any device: Please click HERE to download one of Amazon s Free Reader Apps. After you go to for your free Kindle reader and then go to Unintended Consequences and Donald Trump’s Presidency: Is Donald Trump Fulfilling Biblical, Islamic, Greco-Roman Catholic, Buddhist, and other America-Related Prophecies?

LATEST NEWS REPORTS

LATEST BIBLE PROPHECY INTERVIEWS

[renatoferreiradasilva]

Non-Markovian Spin Coherence and Topological Phase Transitions in Polymer-Based Hybrid Quantum Architectures

Abstract

We present a theoretical study of spin coherence and topological phase behavior in polymer-based hybrid quantum systems that integrate spin qubits, phononic modes, and electromagnetic cavity fields. Our model extends traditional open quantum system approaches by incorporating non-Markovian dynamics with spatially correlated phonon baths and nonlinear spin-phonon-field couplings. Using a generalized Nakajima-Zwanzig formalism, we derive a non-Markovian master equation with finite memory and demonstrate the emergence of subspaces protected against decoherence. We apply a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation to capture second-order renormalization effects and identify topological regimes characterized by nontrivial Chern numbers. Simulations based on hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) confirm coherence time enhancements exceeding an order of magnitude under optimal doping and temperature conditions. These results establish operational zones for hybrid chips and provide a theoretical foundation for quantum medical sensing platforms.

1. Introduction

Hybrid quantum architectures that combine spin systems, mechanical modes, and photonic cavities offer a promising route for scalable and robust quantum devices. Polymers doped with rare-earth ions such as Eu$^{3+}$ serve as excellent hosts for spin qubits due to their long coherence times and chemical tunability. However, modeling decoherence in such platforms remains a challenge due to strong spin-phonon coupling, structured environments, and long memory effects.

In this work, we develop a comprehensive non-Markovian description of decoherence and renormalized interactions in polymer-based spin-phonon-cavity systems. We demonstrate that by tuning nonlinear couplings and exploiting topological protection, one can engineer coherence-preserving states. We also identify optimal doping densities and temperature regimes for future device implementation.

2. Model Hamiltonian and Non-Markovian Dynamics

We consider a multilayered hybrid system with the total Hamiltonian:Htotal=Hspin+Hphonon+Hcavity+Hcoupling+Hdissipative

The interaction Hamiltonian includes second-order nonlinear couplings:H(2)=∑i,j,kλijkσi+σj−(bk+bk†)+∑i,k,mμikmσiz(bk+bk†)(am+am†)

To capture non-Markovian effects, we use the Nakajima-Zwanzig projection technique and derive a memory kernel:dρS(t)dt=−iℏ[Heff(t),ρS(t)]+∫0tds e−(t−s)/τc∑α,βCαβ(t−s)Cαβ[ρS(s)]

where $\tau_c$ is the bath memory time and $C_{\alpha\beta}(t-s)$ encode cross-mode phonon correlations.

3. Effective Hamiltonian and Topological Structure

Applying a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation, we derive a renormalized effective Hamiltonian:Heff=H0+∑iδωiσiz+∑i,jAijσixσjx+Bijσiyσjy+Cijσizσjz

Topological properties emerge when $|\delta\omega_i| < |A_{ij}|$, enabling the definition of a vector field $\vec{d}(\vec{k})$ in reciprocal space and a corresponding Chern number:Ch=14π∫BZd2k d^⋅(∂d^∂kx×∂d^∂ky)

4. Coherence Time Modeling

The coherence time $T_2$ is influenced by nonlinear couplings and phonon spectral density:1T2=1T20+γphonon+γphotonic

We derive doping-dependent expressions for $T_2(\rho_d, T)$ and determine an optimal doping level $\rho_d^{\text{opt}}$ that maximizes $T_2$ under realistic conditions:T2(ρd,T)=[1T20+α(T)ρd+β(T)ρd2]−1

5. Numerical Simulations and Operational Zones

Using HEOM simulations, we explore temperature and doping regimes:

$T = 5$ K, $\rho_d = 0.8%$: $T_2 \approx 950 , \mu$s

$T = 15$ K, $\rho_d = 0.5%$: $T_2 \approx 320 , \mu$s

$T = 30$ K, $\rho_d = 0.3%$: $T_2 \approx 85 , \mu$s

We define three operational zones:

High coherence ($T < 10$ K)

Intermediate regime ($10$ K $< T < 20$ K)

High sensitivity ($T > 20$ K)

6. Conclusion

Our results show that polymer-based hybrid quantum systems, when modeled with realistic non-Markovian dynamics and nonlinear couplings, can exhibit topologically protected states and enhanced spin coherence. This opens pathways for practical implementations in quantum sensing, especially for biomedical diagnostics requiring operation in intermediate-temperature environments.

Corresponding author: Renato Ferreira da Silva

[razieltwelve]

Strip Mining (Final Effect)

So... if the Empire wanted to be evil and strip mine a planet, how would they do it?

Well, it’s actually really simple. They’d use a System Processor to break the planet apart and then process the remains en masse. They can use things like vector fields to separate substances in a manner similar to centrifugal force, along with the vast array of machinery and other devices within the System Processor to sort, process, and package anything of value.

In fact, strip mining a planet is the least of a System Processor’s abilities. As their name implies, they were designed to process entire system’s worth of material... star systems, that is. They possess the ability to create unbelievably powerful gravity distortions to the point that they can be used to harvest vast gas and debris fields in space by collapsing those fields using gravity wells.

As you can imagine, System Processors can also be deployed in a manner akin to warships although they are only used for that purpose against the Grimm. They are considered to indiscriminate in the damage they deal to be used against other civilised species without a declaration of total war.

In the major war against another galaxy that occurred centuries after Final Effect, System Processors were used to devastate thousands of stars systems, resulting in quadrillions of casualties. Keep in mind, this war was a total war, with the Children of Remnant taking trillions of their own casualties when their enemies launched a pre-emptive, unprovoked strike on outlying colonies in the Milky Way Galaxy (Mass Effect Galaxy) in a bid to conquer the Milky Way Galaxy and expand their own sphere of influence following a large-scale Grimm incursion.

The Children of Remnant hold to a reciprocal rules of engagement practice, which means that they are happy to use the same rules of engagement as the enemy. Since the enemy was willing to engage in total war that target non-combatants and non-military worlds without even a formal declaration of war, the Empire and Alliance responded in kind.

That war was eventually won following the destruction of hundreds of thousands of enemy worlds via the deployment of a quasar cannon, a weapon with power output equivalent to a quasar. Basically, imagine a weapon with power output dwarfing a nova cannon (a solar system killer) by many orders of magnitude. This resulted in the actual destruction of significant chunks of the opposing galaxy and the complete inability of the enemy to continue waging war or even mount any sort of resistance.

[learncbse-hindi]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[learnenglishcbsein]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[learncbse-science]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[learncbse6]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[ncertsolutionsbooks]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[shravyasharma190]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[saralasharm]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[mastiadda]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[valpy-blog]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…

[learncbse]

Vector Algebra

Vector

A Vector may be described as a quantity having both magnitude & direction. A vector is generally represented by a directed line segment, say .  A is called the initial point & B is called the terminal point. The magnitude of vector is expressed b Zero Vector  a vector of zero magnitude i.e.which has the same initial & terminal point, is called a Zero Vector. It is denoted by O. Unit…