#Restoration of monuments | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

stupendoustriumphdonut · 11 months

Text

آیا گچبری مدرن بر روی سطوح داخلی و خارجی قابل اعمال است؟

گچبری مدرن یکی از مواد ساختمانی پرکاربرد است که به تازگی توجه بسیاری از سازندگان و معماران را جلب کرده است. این مواد چند منظوره، مقاوم و زیبا باعث شده است که در پروژه‌های داخلی و خارجی بسیاری مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. در این مقاله، ما به بررسی این سوال مهم می‌پردازیم که آیا گچبری مدرن بر روی سطوح داخلی و خارجی قابل اعمال است یا خیر. با ما همراه باشید تا اطلاعات جامعی در این زمینه به دست آورید.

گچبری مدرن به عنوان یک ماده ساختمانی نوین و متعارف در صنعت ساختمان شناخته می‌شود. این ماده با ویژگی‌های منحصر به فردی که دارد، به سازندگان و طراحان امکان می‌دهد تا در پروژه‌های داخلی و خارجی خود از آن بهره‌برند. در ادامه به بررسی ویژگی‌ها، کاربردها، مزایا و معایب گچبری مدرن پرداخته و نحوه اجرای آن را توضیح می‌دهیم.

ویژگی‌های گچبری مدرن

گچبری مدرن با ویژگی‌های منحصر به فردی مانند مقاومت، زیبایی و چند منظورگی شناخته می‌شود. این ویژگی‌ها آن را به یک گزینه مطلوب برای سطوح داخلی و خارجی تبدیل کرده‌اند.

مقاومت :گچبری مدرن به عنوان یک ماده مقاوم شناخته می‌شود. این مقاومت باعث می‌شود تا سطوحی که با گچبری مدرن پوشانده می‌شوند، در برابر ضربه‌ها و فشارهای مختلف مقاومت کنند.

زیبایی :یکی از ویژگی‌های بارز گچبری مدرن، زیبایی ظاهری آن است. این ماده به سطوح یک پوشش نرم و شفاف می‌دهد که به نمای ساختمان جلب‌کننده‌تری می‌دهد.

چند منظورگی: گچبری مدرن برای مصارف متعددی قابل استفاده است. از دیوارها و سقف‌ها تا کف‌ها و میزها، می‌توان از آن در انواع مختلف پروژه‌ها استفاده کرد.

کاربردهای سطوح داخلی با گچبری مدرن

دیوارها: یکی از کاربردهای اصلی گچبری مدرن در داخل ساختمان، پوشش دیوارهاست. این ماده به دیوارها زیبایی می‌بخشد و می‌توان طراحی‌های خاصی روی آن اعمال کرد.

سقف: گچبری مدرن همچنین می‌تواند به عنوان یک پوشش سقف مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. این کاربرد به سقف‌ها زیبایی و شکوه می‌بخشد.

کف:در برخی پروژه‌ها، از گچبری مدرن برای پوشش کف‌ها استفاده می‌شود. این ماده می‌تواند کف‌ها را جذاب‌تر کند و آنها را محافظت کند.

دکوراسیون داخلی: علاوه بر کاربردهای اصلی، گچبری مدرن می‌تواند در دکوراسیون داخلی نیز مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. از آن برای ساخت میزها، قاب‌ها و زیرسازی‌های دکوراتیو استفاده می‌شود.

کاربردهای سطوح خارجی با گچبری مدرن

نمای ساختمان : یکی از کاربردهای جالب گچبری مدرن، پوشش نمای ساختمان است. این ماده به نمای ساختمان شکوهی و جلب‌کننده‌تری می‌دهد.

پیش‌سازی : قبل از پوشاندن سطوح خارجی با مصالح دیگر، می‌توان از گچبری مدرن برای پیش‌سازی سطوح استفاده کرد. این کار به ایجاد یک پایه مقاوم برای مصالح دیگر کمک می‌کند.

محوطه‌سازی : در مناطقی که نیاز به محوطه‌سازی دارند، گچبری مدرن نیز می‌تواند مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. این ماده به ایجاد مسیرها، محوطه‌های جلوی خانه و فضاهای باز کمک می‌کند.

مزایا و معایب گچبری مدرن

مزایا در گچبری مدرن: زیبایی و مقاومت: یکی از مزایای بزرگ گچبری مدرن، ترکیب زیبایی و مقاومت است. این ماده به ساختمان‌ها زیبایی می‌بخشد و در عین حال مقاومت در برابر ضربه‌ها و فشارها دارد.

معایب در گچبری مدرن: حساسیت به آب: یکی از معایب گچبری مدرن حساسیت به آب است. اگر این ماده با آب در تماس بیافتد، ممکن است آسیب ببیند و تغییر شکل دهد. بنابراین، در مناطق با باران فراوان، نیاز به توجه ویژه دارد.

مراحل اجرای گچبری مدرن

برای اعمال گچبری مدرن بر روی سطوح داخلی و خارجی، باید مراحل خاصی را دنبال کرد. این مراحل عبارتند از:

آماده‌سازی سطح: در ابتدا، سطحی که قرار است گچبری مدرن روی آن اعمال شود باید آماده شود. این شامل تمیزکردن و صیقل دادن سطح می‌شود.

اعمال گچبری: سپس، گچبری مدرن با استفاده از ابزارهای مناسب بر روی سطح اعمال می‌شود. این مرحله بسیار حساسی است و نیاز به دقت دارد.

تمامیت و پایان: بعد از اعمال گچبری، باید تمامیت سطح چک شود و هر گونه نقص یا عیبی تصحیح شود. سپس پایان‌دهی نهایی انجام می‌شود.

مقایسه با مواد ساختمانی دیگر

برای انتخاب مواد ساختمانی برای پروژه خود، مقایسه با مواد دیگر ضروری است. گچبری مدرن را می‌توان با موادی مانند سنگ، سرامیک و بتن مقایسه کرد.

- با سنگ: گچبری مدرن از لحاظ زیبایی با سنگ رقابت می‌کند و در برخی موارد از آن جلب‌کننده‌تر است.

- با سرامیک: در کاربردهای داخلی، گچبری مدرن به عنوان یک جایگزین مناسب برای سرامیک مطرح است.

- با بتن: برخلاف بتن، گچبری مدرن به ساختمان‌ها زیبایی می‌بخشد و در عین حال مقاومت مطلوبی دارد.

آیا گچبری مدرن بر روی سطوح خارجی مقاومت دارد؟

بله، گچبری مدرن می‌تواند بر روی سطوح خارجی نیز مقاومت داشته باشد. با توجه به پیشرفت‌های صنعت ساختمانی، گچبری مدرن عموماً شامل سیستم‌هایی است که به سطوح دیوارها و نمای خارجی ساختمان اعمال می‌شود و می‌تواند مقاومت مناسبی در برابر عوامل جوی مختلف نظیر بارش باران، تابش نور خورشید، و تغییرات دما داشته باشد.

معمولاً در گچبری مدرن بر روی سطوح خارجی، از مواد مقاوم و ماندگاری بالا استفاده می‌شود که تحمل خوبی در برابر رطوبت، حرارت، UV و سایر عوامل زیستی و محیطی دارند. همچنین، انتخاب رنگ ضد آب و مقاوم در برابر پوسیدگی نیز می‌تواند مانع از آسیب به سطح گچبری شود.

با این حال، برای اطمینان کامل و بررسی دقیق تر درباره مقاومت گچبری مدرن بر روی سطوح خارجی، بهتر است با متخصصان مجرب مطیفی فرد در حوزه ساختمانی و گچبری مشورت کنید. آنها می‌توانند به شما راهنمایی کنند و بهترین روش‌ها و مواد برای نصب گچبری مدرن را بر روی سطوح خارجی معرفی کنند.

چقدر زمان برای اجرای گچبری مدرن نیاز است؟

زمان لازم برای اجرای گچبری مدرن بستگی به عوامل متعددی دارد از جمله اندازه و پیچیدگی پروژه، تعداد سطوح و اتاق‌هایی که باید گچبری شوند، تجهیزات و تیم کاری موجود، و سرعت کار و تجربه اجراکنندگان.

برای یک پروژه معمولی، زمانی که برای گچبری مدرن در نظر گرفته می‌شود ممکن است تا چند روز یا هفته طول بکشد. این شامل زمان لازم برای آماده‌سازی سطح، نصب و روان‌کاری گچبری، و اعمال پوشش و تمامیت پروژه است.

همچنین، باید توجه داشته باشید که پروژه‌های بزرگتر و پیچیده‌تر ممکن است زمان بیشتری برای اجرا نیاز داشته باشند. همچنین، تأخیرهایی نظیر شرایط جوی نامساعد، مشکلات فنی، یا تغییرات در برنامه‌ریزی ممکن است تأثیری بر زمان اجرا داشته باشند.

بهتر است با پیمانکاران گچبری مدرن محلی یا متخصصان ساختمانی مشورت کنید تا زمان مورد نیاز برای پروژه خاص شما را تخمین بزنند و برنامه‌ریزی مناسبی را ارائه دهند.

نتیجه

در نهایت، گچبری مدرن یک ماده ساختمانی کارآمد و زیبا برای سطوح داخلی و خارجی است. با ویژگی‌های منحصر به فردی که دارد، می‌تواند به پروژه‌های ساختمانی زیبایی و مقاومت بیافزاید. با انتخاب درست و استفاده صحیح از آن، می‌توانید به نتایج مطلوبی دست یابید.

#Traditional plastering #Modern plastering #Plastering #Classic plaster #Restoration of monuments

0 notes

rethinkingthefuture1 · 2 years

Text

An overview of Restoration of Monuments in India

India is a country which is understood for its sturdy diversity, culture, history, and architecture The monuments unfold throughout the state and function

#Restoration of Monuments

0 notes

rawliverandgoronspice · 1 year

Note

Even 6 years after botw, and 3 months after totk's release, I have to admit: They're good games, though lacking in story, but they're honestly not good "Legend of Zelda games." Totk being less so than botw. It's not about the shrines, puzzles or temples, or lack of them; the games are just kinda missing that LoZ feeling. I think an anon had a good take: LoZ refers to Zelda's story from a historians perspective, but is actually the story of Link and his adventure for us players. Botw is missing that, and in totk that's completely gone, with everything focusing on Zelda.

Hey, thank you!

I think I try to stray away from what makes a good Zelda game (or a Zelda game altogether) because I think that there is nothing more Zelda-core than fighting about what makes the essence of Zelda, and everybody being convinced they're extremely right about it (not excluding myself AT ALL btw, it's just... for some reason it's impossible to talk about Zelda and what you care about in the series without taking it to weird absolutes and being semi-toxic about it, which ??? it's so strange that it's a nearly-universal thing, why is it such a thing) and it's ultimately very personal. Obviously they kind of lost me with TotK in terms of player values, but I completely relate to seeing this thing you love drifting away from you.

I think what I miss the most is the bittersweetness, this idea that for any act of bravery to become a legend, you have to part with something meaningful and let it rest behind. At the heart of every single one of your adventures, there is this sacrifice that you have to make: be it a relationship, a sense of innocence, a person, an entire world... I often hear that Zelda only cares for happy endings, and I don't think it's that true? Like of course things are good by the end, the baddie is dead or sealed away, you are triumphant, the world is no longer in disarray... But there's always a cost.

I think it's really the heart of why I failed to connect with TotK's themes at the end of the day, if I try to de-intellectualize and take it in a more emotional way (and then of course it resonates with all of the reasons why I'm bothered with depicting any kingdom as worth preserving as is, without questioning anything about it)

#asks #thoughts #totk #totk critical #tloz #when will my brain return from the imprisoning war...#thanks for the ask!!#yeah I can think of something we the player personally lose in any other game I've played #but totk it's... yeah...#I suppose the zonais count?#but even their civilization and monuments seem to be staying there when the game end? so it's not even a case of “the past fading away”#which would have been cool and also emotionally compelling #and thematically stronger #like “you have dealt with the past's weird hangups now go and make your own future”#but here it just... freezes everything in time #I suppose Rauru Sonia and Mineru count?? but like you have no relationship with them #it was zelda's loss not the player's #I guess you lose your arm?? but really you're just restoring what was before the game started #and it's portrayed as a good thing too not like parting with a strong newfound part of your identity you will learn to live without

27 notes · View notes

dougielombax · 10 months

Text

Just leaving this here.

Feel free to reblog.

It’s a month or two late but still.

8 notes · View notes

rabbitcruiser · 3 months

Text

Following the American Civil War, Florida’s congressional representation was restored on June 25, 1868.

2 notes · View notes

drownmeinbeauty · 5 months

Text

FAR, FAR AWAY

Years ago I met a man who told me he was from Côte d'Ivoire and those words, uttered on a frigid Sunday morning on a street corner in midtown, conjured up a fantasy of Africa, a romance of the continent, almost entirely uninformed, that remains with me.

The words Angkor Wat do the same.

I know little about the twelfth-century temple complex in Cambodia. I've seen grainy nineteenth-century photographs and talked with architects who've visited. I remember the gorgeous footage from In the Mood for Love, in which Hong Kong film start Tony Leung wanders the grounds alone, in silence, running his hands along the stone, summoning a long-ago heartbreak that will shadow his entire life. The place obliges. It's sensual and severe, ancient and embracing, with chambers and corners in which to hide.

A smart video from the Worlds Monuments Fund goes a way to dismiss the romanticism. Drone footage highlights the vastness of the site and its lush watery surrounds. The camera lingers over piles of giant stone blocks, which are being reset after structural reinforcing and waterproofing work is completed. There's a discussion of the enormous fig tree whose roots straddle the roof at Ta Prohm like tentacles, with the promise that both structure and tree will be preserved. There are interviews with engineers and artisans carrying out the restoration work, which seems terribly pragmatic.

Then there's a pan shot of Churning of the Ocean of Milk, the iconic bas relief depicting that episode in Hindu mythology, with phalanxes of demons and angels stirring up the elixir of everlasting life, amrita. Right then the dream of Angkor Wat re-emerges. We see these creatures carved, life-size (that is, at the size of human adults), compressed in dramatic repetition, rendered richly within an inch of the surface of stone, a work of delirious craft and precision. What men carved these stones, through how many years, and what thoughts, what songs, were with them as they worked?

Longing for a place requires knowing something about it while at the same time knowing nothing. Can one understand a place correctly and remain enchanted by it? I want to see Angkor Wat and also hold onto my fantasy of that place.

Photograph by Émile Gsell, 1866.

#ARCHITECTURE #HISTORY #COLONIALISM #ruinporn #RESTORATION #Cambodia #Angkor Wat #wmf #World Monuments Fund

3 notes · View notes

richwall101 · 2 years

Text

Stonehenge is a prehistoric monument on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, England, two miles (3 km) west of Amesbury. It consists of an outer ring of vertical sarsen standing stones, each around 13 feet (4.0 m) high, seven feet (2.1 m) wide, and weighing around 25 tons, topped by connecting horizontal lintel stones. Inside is a ring of smaller bluestones. Inside these are free-standing trilithons, two bulkier vertical sarsens joined by one lintel. The whole monument, now ruinous, is aligned towards the sunrise on the summer solstice. The stones are set within earthworks in the middle of the densest complex of Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments in England, including several hundred tumuli (burial mounds). Archaeologists believe that Stonehenge was constructed from 3000 BCE to 2000 BCE. The surrounding circular earth bank and ditch, which constitute the earliest phase of the monument, have been dated to about 3100 BCE. Radiocarbon dating suggests that the first bluestones were raised between 2400 and 2200 BCE, although they may have been at the site as early as 3000 BCE. The lower picture was taken in 1932 prior to the restoration of the stones. The restorations began in 1901 and continued through many phases until the final restoration was completed in 1963 (Top Photo).

#Stonehenge #Restoration #Wiltshire #Monument #UK

43 notes · View notes

wonder-worker · 9 months

Note

how do you think the Lancasters stood the best chance at winning the war?

Imo, if they'd won at Mortimer's Cross or Towton, the Yorkists would be finished.

A lot of the WotR depended on military victories, tbh. We tend to get distracted by fancy discussions like "Who had the best claim?"* or Propaganda Roulette 101, but the fact remains that it was ultimately military victories that sealed the deal and got rid of opposition**. Everything else was pretty wrapping on top of the already-won or to-be-won prize.

*The most useless debate of all **The exception was Richard III's usurpation but that was a fairly unconventional and entirely unexpected usurpation, and in any case it was a military defeat that ended his reign.

#ask #wars of the roses #Remember that the Yorkists were on the brink of total defeat by the end of 1460 #The Duke of York and his second son were killed; and his heir was only 18; the King would soon be reclaimed from their grasp #If they'd lost in 1461 their cause would most likely be over #A fairly analogous example would be the Battle of Bosworth - if Richard III had won Henry Tudor's cause would be finished #(and he'd probably be dead)#If the Lancastrians had seized London they'd have a huge advantage but might also encounter some difficulties #including a potential siege and hostility from the aldermen and public. But a military victory would seal the deal #Also I think I've mentioned in some tags before but imo it's clear that the Lancastrians stood a monumentally better chance at #consolidating their power/support/reputation if they won in 1461 rather than 1471 #A 1471 military victory would result in victory but would also bring with it a whole host of other problems in terms of consolidation #(Among others: the inevitable head-on national clash between Yorkist and Lancastrian lords in terms of forfeited and restored estates #which had been postponed by Warwick but would undoubtedly take center stage once the royal family was properly established #and would almost definitely result in the eruption of widespread rivalries and resentment from the affected parties;#foreign and domestic policy with regards to the promised war with Burgundy which was very unpopular with the English patriciate; etc)#(That's not even getting into whether Warwick would survive or not and the equally complicated possibilities in either scenario #or George of Clarence: whether their victory would be before or after he switched sides and what that would mean for him)#There's also the obvious fact that Henry VI would still ultimately be King - and that can take VERY different routes depending #on the wider situation #In a completely alternate scenario if they had established themselves when Edward IV was still in exile he would be out of reach #which would over-complicate matters even further #(I'd be personally curious to know if they took any action against royal claims through the female line considering this was a HUGE #aspect of their gendered propaganda in the 1460s to try and delegitimize the Yorkist claim...Henry IV gave them an obvious precedent)#a 1471 victor would also be devastating on a personal level for everyone involved considering Henry's imprisonment and #Margaret and Edward's almost decade-long exile before it #It would be significantly more devastating for Edward IV's widow and four frighteningly young children - especially considering #that unlike Margaret or Anne Neville they lacked the active/direct connection of powerful foreign or national relatives #All in all - It's difficult to say but it's clear that a path forward in 1471 would be tremendously hard #A victory in 1461 would not only forever end the Yorkist challenge but would also ensure a far smoother aftermath for the Lancasters

2 notes · View notes

boreal-sea · 3 months

Text

Look.

I have made you a chart. A very simple chart.

People say "You have to draw the line somewhere, and Biden has crossed it-" and my response is "Trump has crossed way more lines than Biden".

These categories are based off of actual policy enacted by both of these men while they were in office.

If the ONLY LINE YOU CARE ABOUT is line 12, you have an incredible amount of privilege, AND YOU DO NOT CARE ABOUT PALESTINIANS. You obviously have nothing to fear from a Trump presidency, and you do not give a fuck if a ceasefire actually occurs. You are obviously fine if your queer, disabled, and marginalized loved ones are hurt. You clearly don't care about the status of American democracy, which Trump has openly stated he plans to destroy on day 1 he is in office.

EDIT:

Ok fine, I spent 3 hours compiling sources for all of these, you can find that below the cut.

I'll give at least one link per subject area. There are of course many more sources to be read on these subject areas and no post could possibly give someone a full education on these subjects.

Biden and trans rights: https://www.hrc.org/resources/president-bidens-pro-lgbtq-timeline

Trump and trans rights: https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/trump-on-lgbtq-rights-rolling-back-protections-and-criminalizing-gender-nonconformity

The two sources above show how Biden has done a lot of work to promote trans rights, and how Trump did a lot of work to hurt trans rights.

Biden on abortion access: https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/08/politics/what-is-in-biden-abortion-executive-order/index.html

Trump on abortion access: https://apnews.com/article/abortion-trump-republican-presidential-election-2024-585faf025a1416d13d2fbc23da8d8637

Biden openly supports access to abortion and has taken steps to protect those rights at a federal level even after Roe v Wade was overturned. Trump, on the other hand, was the man who appointed the judges who helped overturn Roe v Wade and he openly brags about how proud he is of that decision. He also states that he believes individual states should have the final say in whether or not abortion is legal, and that he trusts them to "do the right thing", meaning he supports stronger abortion bans.

Biden on environmental reform: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/10/07/fact-sheet-president-biden-restores-protections-for-three-national-monuments-and-renews-american-leadership-to-steward-lands-waters-and-cultural-resources/

Trump on environmental reform: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/climate/trump-environment-rollbacks-list.html

Biden has made major steps forward for environmental reform. He has restored protections that Trump rolled back. He has enacted many executive orders and more to promote environmental protections, including rejoining the Paris Accords, which Trump withdrew the USA from. Trump is also well known for spreading conspiracy theories and lies about global climate change, calling it a "Chinese hoax".

Biden on healthcare and prescription reform: https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/06/09/biden-administration-announces-savings-43-prescription-drugs-part-cost-saving-measures-president-bidens-inflation-reduction-act.html

Trump on healthcare reform: https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/07/politics/obamacare-health-insurance-ending-trump/index.html

I'm rolling healthcare and prescriptions and vaccines and public health all into one category here since they are related. Biden has lowered drug costs, expanded access to medicaid, and ACA enrollment has risen during his presidency. He has also made it so medical debt no longer applies to a person's credit score. He signed many executive orders during his first few weeks in office in order to get a handle on Trump's grievous mishandling of the COVID pandemic. Trump also wants to end the ACA. Trump is well known for refusing to wear a mask during the pandemic, encouraging the use of hydroxylchloroquine to "treat" COVID, and being openly anti-vaxx.

Biden on student loan forgiveness: https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/biden-harris-administration-announces-additional-77-billion-approved-student-debt-relief-160000-borrowers

Trump on student loan forgiveness: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2024/06/20/trump-knocks-bidens-vile-student-loan-forgiveness-plans-suggests-reversal/

Trump wants to reverse the student loan forgiveness plans Biden has enacted. Biden has already forgiven billions of dollars in loans and continues to work towards forgiving more.

Infrastructure funding:

I'm putting these links next together because they are all about infrastructure.

In general, Trump's "achievements" for infrastructure were to destroy environmental protections to speed up projects. Many of his plans were ineffective due to the fact that he did not clearly outline where the money was going to come from, and he was unwilling to raise taxes to pay for the projects. He was unable (and unwilling) to pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill during his 4 years in office. He did sign a few disaster relief bills. He did not enthusiastically promote renewable energy infrastructure. He created "Infrastructure Weeks" that the federal government then failed to fund. Trump did not do nothing for infrastructure, but his no-tax stance and his dislike for renewable energy means the contributions he made to American infrastructure were not as much as he claimed they were, nor as much as they could have been. Basically, he made a lot of promises, and delivered on very few of them. He is not "against" infrastructure, but he's certainly against funding it.

Biden was able to pass that bipartisan bill after taking office. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Plan that Trump tried to prevent from passing during Biden's term contains concrete funding sources and step by step plans to rebuild America's infrastructure. If you want to read the plan, you can find it here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/build/guidebook/. Biden has done far more for American infrastructure than Trump did, most notably by actually getting the bipartisan bill through congress.

Biden on Racial Equity: https://www.npr.org/sections/president-biden-takes-office/2021/01/26/960725707/biden-aims-to-advance-racial-equity-with-executive-actions

Trump on Racial Equity: https://www.axios.com/2024/04/01/trump-reverse-racism-civil-rights https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-37230916

Trump's racist policies are loud and clear for everyone to hear. We all heard him call Mexicans "Drug dealers, criminals, rapists". We all watched as he enacted travel bans on people from majority-Muslim nations. Biden, on the other hand, has done quite a lot during his term to attempt to reconcile racism in this country, including reversing Trump's "Muslim ban" the first day he was in office.

Biden on DEI: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/06/25/executive-order-on-diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility-in-the-federal-workforce/

Trump on DEI: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-tried-to-crush-the-dei-revolution-heres-how-he-might-finish-the-job/ar-BB1jg3gz

Biden supports DEI and has signed executive orders and passed laws that support DEI on the federal level. Trump absolutely hates DEI and wants to eradicate it.

Biden on criminal justice reform: https://time.com/6155084/biden-criminal-justice-reform/

Trump on criminal justice reform: https://www.vox.com/2020-presidential-election/21418911/donald-trump-crime-criminal-justice-policy-record https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/05/trumps-extreme-plans-crime/678502/

From pardons for non-violent marijuana convictions to reducing the federal government's reliance on private prisons, Biden has done a lot in four years to reform our criminal justice system on the federal level. Meanwhile, Trump has described himself as "tough on crime". He advocates for more policing, including "stop and frisk" activities. Ironically it's actually quite difficult to find sources about what Trump thinks about crime, because almost all of the search results are about his own crimes.

Biden on military support for Israel: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/biden-obama-divide-closely-support-israel-rcna127107

Trump on military support for Israel: https://www.vox.com/politics/353037/trump-gaza-israel-protests-biden-election-2024

Biden supports Israel financially and militarily and promotes holding Israel close. So did Trump. Trump was also very pro-Israel during his time in office and even moved the embassy to Jerusalem and declared Jerusalem the capitol of Israel, a move that inflamed attitudes in the region.

Biden on a ceasefire: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2024/06/05/gaza-israel-hamas-cease-fire-plan-biden/73967659007/

Trump on a ceasefire: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-israel-gaza-finish-problem-rcna141905

Trump has tried to be quiet on the issue but recently said he wants Israel to "finish the problem". He of course claims he could have prevented the whole problem. Trump also openly stated after Oct 7th that he would bar immigrants who support Hamas from the country and send in officers to American protests to arrest anyone supporting Hamas.

Biden meanwhile has been quietly urging Netanyahu to accept a ceasefire deal for months, including the most recent announcement earlier in June, though it seems as though that deal has finally fallen through as well.

#i/p #biden #uspol #election 2024

103K notes · View notes

obscurecurse · 3 months

Text

Allegheny Cemetery, Pittsburgh, PA

Aug 2022

#that same monument in prev from a dif angle #it really is the star of the show #someone placed that flower in the handle of the door on that mausoleum #it restored my faith in humanity #allegheny cemetery

1 note · View note

nicolae · 4 months

Text

Tropaeum Augusti (France) and Tropaeum Traiani (Romania): A Comparative Study

View On WordPress

#construction #France #restoration #Roman triumphal monuments #România #Tropaeum Augusti #Tropaeum Traiani

0 notes

lordgodjehovahsway · 4 months

Text

2 Samuel 8: God Gives David Victories Over All His Enemies

1 In the course of time, David defeated the Philistines and subdued them, and he took Metheg Ammah from the control of the Philistines.

2 David also defeated the Moabites. He made them lie down on the ground and measured them off with a length of cord. Every two lengths of them were put to death, and the third length was allowed to live. So the Moabites became subject to David and brought him tribute.

3 Moreover, David defeated Hadadezer son of Rehob, king of Zobah, when he went to restore his monument at the Euphrates River.

4 David captured a thousand of his chariots, seven thousand charioteers and twenty thousand foot soldiers. He hamstrung all but a hundred of the chariot horses.

5 When the Arameans of Damascus came to help Hadadezer king of Zobah, David struck down twenty-two thousand of them.

6 He put garrisons in the Aramean kingdom of Damascus, and the Arameans became subject to him and brought tribute. The Lord gave David victory wherever he went.

7 David took the gold shields that belonged to the officers of Hadadezer and brought them to Jerusalem.

8 From Tebah and Berothai, towns that belonged to Hadadezer, King David took a great quantity of bronze.

9 When Tou king of Hamath heard that David had defeated the entire army of Hadadezer,

10 he sent his son Joram to King David to greet him and congratulate him on his victory in battle over Hadadezer, who had been at war with Tou. Joram brought with him articles of silver, of gold and of bronze.

11 King David dedicated these articles to the Lord, as he had done with the silver and gold from all the nations he had subdued:

12 Edom and Moab, the Ammonites and the Philistines, and Amalek. He also dedicated the plunder taken from Hadadezer son of Rehob, king of Zobah.

13 And David became famous after he returned from striking down eighteen thousand Edomites in the Valley of Salt.

14 He put garrisons throughout Edom, and all the Edomites became subject to David. The Lord gave David victory wherever he went.

David’s Officials

15 David reigned over all Israel, doing what was just and right for all his people.

16 Joab son of Zeruiah was over the army; Jehoshaphat son of Ahilud was recorder;

17 Zadok son of Ahitub and Ahimelek son of Abiathar were priests; Seraiah was secretary;

18 Benaiah son of Jehoiada was over the Kerethites and Pelethites; and David’s sons were priests.

0 notes